PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Food Additives”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Monitoring adverse reactions to food additives in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Technological advances in food science have resulted in the development of numerous food additives, most of which require premarket approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Concomitant with the benefits of these additives, such as extending the shelf life of certain food commodities, is the potential for various risks. These potential risks include the possibility of the consumer experiencing an adverse reaction to the additive. In order to ascertain the character and the gravity of alleged adverse reactions to food products which it regulates, the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition has developed the Adverse Reaction Monitoring System (ARMS). This postmarketing surveillance system for food additives is designed to analyze consumer reports of adverse reactions in order to alert FDA officials about any potential public health hazard associated with an approved food additive, and to delineate specific syndromes which may lead to focused clinical investigations. To date, among the products routinely monitored in the ARMS, sulfiting agents and the artificial sweetener aspartame have generated the largest volume of consumer reports describing adverse reactions. An overview of the analyses of the sulfite and aspartame adverse reaction reports is presented, along with a description of the mechanics of the postmarketing surveillance system, and a detailed discussion of its limitations.

Aspartame↗

Toxicological evaluation of food additives. Toxicological evaluation over estimation of potential high intake to permitted levels of use of food additives and vice versa.

Permitted levels of use for food additives should agree with the acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) established by toxicologists. To ensure accordance, nutritional and physiological factors can be used to estimate high intakes of food and beverages. Appetite and thirst (energy and liquid requirements) are such quantitative factors. They are universal and, if placed on the same level as the ADI, i.e., expressed on a kilogram of body weight basis, can be used to estimate high intakes of an additive. This tool can be easily used to judge whether a suggested level of use may cause consumption of the additive to exceed the ADI. It also tells us to what level (ADI) toxicological clearance should be sought, when the technological need is known. The method is independent of food consumption surveys, but these may be carried out to confirm its forecasts. This paper uses caramel in soft drinks as an example. The approach, also called "the budget method," has been tried out in Denmark and Sweden. It is now being offered as a solution to the problem facing the European Communities: to establish before 1993 a common list of food additives containing quantitative limitations for use.

Appetite↗

Priority-based assessment of food additives database of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

The priority-based assessment of food additives (PAFA) is a database maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. PAFA contains extensive administrative, chemical, and toxicological information on 1685 regulated direct food additives. The database also has limited administrative and chemical information on an additional 1236 direct additives. The total 2921 substances represent everything added to food in the United States. PAFA contains up to 150 different kinds of information about each chemical. Administrative and chemical information includes Chemical Abstracts Service Registry numbers, Code of Federal Regulations citations, the annual usage and estimated daily U.S. human consumption, the Joint Committee on Food Additives Allowable Daily Intakes, the FDA Redbook structure categories of the chemicals, and their technical effects. Toxicology information shows the type of studies done for each chemical, the species of animals tested, the toxicological effects observed and the sites where they were seen, the lowest doses that cause a toxicological effect in each study, a source citation, and other types of related information.

Administration, Oral↗