[Experiences with the hypnotic and narcotic pro dorm in psychiatric hospitals and outpatient services].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
All incident cases of diabetes mellitus in the age group 15 to 34 years have been prospectively registered in Sweden since January 1983. To analyse the utilization of outpatient services 8 years after disease onset, we selected the cases registered in 1983 and two controls per case from the general population, matched by age, gender, and county of residence. In 1991, retrospective data about utilization patterns during a 3-month period were collected via a mailed questionnaire, returned by 317 (72%) patients with diabetes and 586 (68%) controls. Seventy-four percent of the cases and 19% of the controls reported at least one visit to a hospital outpatient clinic, including accident and emergency departments. The odds ratio for one visit was 14 (95% CI 9.6-20), for two visits 11 (95% CI 7.0-18), and for three or more visits 8.9 (95% CI 5.6-14). Even when specialized diabetes clinics were excluded from the analysis, the cases had higher odds for visits to internal medicine clinics, to ophthalmology clinics, and to gynaecology clinics, but not for visits to surgical clinics or to accident and emergency departments. Of non-hospital outpatient services, only visits to nurse practitioners were reported by a higher percentage of diabetic responders. Twenty-seven percent of patients with diabetes, as compared to 9% of the controls, had visited both hospital and non-hospital outpatient offices. Females were overrepresented among diabetic high-consumers. The results indicate that most young to middle-aged Swedish persons with diabetes are monitored at hospital outpatient offices, but considerable overlap exists between hospital and non-hospital outpatient services. Further research is needed into the determinants of utilization patterns in diabetes, such as gender.
The past 15-year period has seen an increase in use of psychiatric outpatient services. Hospital capacity has been reduced, concurrently. In this study, the number of admissions, and the use of hospital beds, are compared prior to and following the expansion of outpatient services for a particular catchment area in Southern Norway. No significant change was found in either number of admissions or length of hospital stay, despite a threefold increase in outpatient services. Possible explanations are discussed.
The outpatient pharmaceutical services provided by university or medical school-affiliated hospitals and those offered by community hospitals were compared. A questionnaire was sent to a sampling of hospitals that had full-time pharmaceutical services. The hospital pharmacists were asked how frequently they performed 13 patient-oriented services. Four hundred community hospitals from 13 western states and 95 university hospitals nationwide were surveyed. The four null hypotheses tested were: (I) There is no difference between university and community hospitals in mean frequency of patient-oriented pharmaceutical services; (II) the mean frequencies of patient-oriented services are independent of hospital bed capacity; (III) the mean frequencies of patient-oriented services are independent of whether or not clinic outpatients are served by the outpatient pharmacy; and (IV) the mean frequencies of patient-oriented services are independent of the number of full-time equivalent pharmacists employed by the pharmacy. Performance of the 13 patient-oriented services was almost parallel for both the university and community hospitals. The only service that demonstrated a significant difference (p less than 0.05) between the two groups was "prescribing and renewing medication at the request of the physician." The most frequently performed services were to give patients oral medication instructions and drug information for the medical staff. Null hypothesis I was not rejected. A four-way analysis of variance was performed on null hypotheses II, III, and IV; II and III were rejected (alpha less than or equal to 0.05). Nevertheless, a one-way analysis of variance, post-hoc test, and t test revealed that the performance of patient-oriented services was more frequent in hospitals with less than 100 beds and in hospitals that provided outpatient services to clinic patients. Null hypothesis IV was not rejected.
One of the first case management (CM) programs for limiting Medicaid enrollees' freedom of choice of provider was established by Utah. By assigning enrollees to specific providers responsible for arranging all nonemergency care, Utah intended both to improve access and to reduce program costs. State officials expected the program to increase recipients' use of primary-care providers, while reducing their use of specialists, prescription drugs, and hospital outpatient services. Savings from reductions in unnecessary use were expected to more than offset increases in outlays arising from access enhancements, resulting in lower program expenditures. This study investigated the extent to which the state Medicaid program achieved these goals. The analysis was based on a two-part multivariate model of usage, estimated from data created from claims-level information provided by Utah. The findings revealed that the use of primary-care physician services increased significantly. However, the program also raised the use of specialists' services and prescription drugs. In contrast, the use of hospital outpatient services was lowered. Overall, CM apparently achieved the objective of increased access, but failed to attain the cost-containment goal. The findings indicated that expected costs for ambulatory care rose by 25% in the early years as a result of case management.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system, and to implement certain related provisions of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 and the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005. In this final rule with comment period, we describe changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. These changes are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2007. In addition, this final rule with comment period implements future CY 2009 required reporting on quality measures for hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. This final rule with comment period revises the current list of procedures that are covered when furnished in a Medicare-approved ambulatory surgical center (ASC), which are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2007. This final rule with comment period revises the emergency medical screening requirements for critical access hospitals (CAHs). This final rule with comment period supports implementation of a restructuring of the contracting entities responsibilities and functions that support the adjudication of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims. This restructuring is directed by section 1874A of the Act, as added by section 911 of the MMA. The prior separate Medicare intermediary and Medicare carrier contracting authorities under Title XVIII of the Act have been replaced with the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) authority. This final rule continues to implement the requirements of the DRA that require that we expand the "starter set" of 10 quality measures that we used in FY 2005 and FY 2006 for the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) Reporting Hospital Quality Data for the Annual Payment Update (RHQDAPU) program. We began to adopt expanded measures effective for payments beginning in FY 2007. In this rule, we are finalizing additional quality measures for the expanded set of measures for FY 2008 payment purposes. These measures include the HCAHPS survey, as well as Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP, formerly Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP)), and Mortality quality measures.
This final rule sets forth the methodology that will be used to determine payments for hospital outpatient services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries in connection with ambulatory surgical procedures. This rule implements section 9343(a) of the Omnibus budget Reconciliation Act of 1986.
Visits to hospital outpatient clinics and emergency rooms by patients age 65 and over were studied. Differences were found in the use of mental health services between the oldest old and youngest old. A significant portion of psychiatric and substance abuse disorders was found among the youngest old, while the oldest old made a greater number of visits to emergency rooms.
OBJECTIVES: To examine overall and diagnosis-specific trends in the use of inpatient and outpatient medical services (1970-1988) among older members of a large HMO. DESIGN: Two cohorts of approximately 3000 persons aged 65 or older in 1971 and 1980 were compared for hospital and outpatient utilization during 9-year follow-up periods (1971-79 and 1980-88). All subjects were evaluated for vital status throughout the follow-up period as well. PARTICIPANTS: All 6057 subjects were members of the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in 1971 or 1980. The study sample was sex-age stratified (65-69,70-79,80+) at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Data on demographics, outpatient health services utilization, categories of outpatient utilization and disease diagnoses were obtained from membership lists or medical chart review; inpatient utilization, including admitting and discharge diagnosis, length of stay, and number of hospital days was assessed from computerized hospitalization records. RESULTS: Hospital discharge rates (sex-age adjusted) increased by 12% between cohorts, with the largest increases at the oldest ages. There was a 25% increase among women and a 9% increase among men. Length of stay decreased by 20%. Hospitalization for ischemic heart disease decreased by 17%. Congestive heart failure (CHF) discharge rates (sex-age adjusted) were 92% higher in the 1980-88 cohort. For diagnoses related to nursing home institutionalization and frailty, discharge rates were significantly higher in the 1980-88 cohort: pneumonia (+34%), urinary tract infections (+104%), dehydration (+110%), osteoarthritis (+64%), syncope (+246%), leg cellulitis (+70%). In-hospital survival improved, but overall percent of readmissions also increased by 4%; readmissions for CHF increased by 13% and those for conditions of frailty by 120%. Overall outpatient visits increased by 17%. Use of laboratory tests (+57%) and outpatient surgeries (+99%) increased for all age strata in 1980-88 compared with 1971-79. CONCLUSIONS: While overall outpatient and inpatient utilization has largely decreased over the past 30 years, as a result of economic factors and improved treatments for some major diseases, there has been an increase in utilization among older people. Hospitalization for diagnoses associated with end-stage cardiovascular disease (CHF), musculoskeletal disease, frailty and iatrogenic aspects of institutionalization are clearly increasing substantially. The largest impact of aging on health care may be the result of institutionalization and its sequelae. Improved treatment for cardiovascular disease may also be leading to increased utilization at later stages in the disease process.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined health care resource utilization and direct health care costs among patients diagnosed with bipolar I disorder in a privately insured population. METHODS: Health care claims data for 2883 patients with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder were compared over a 1-year period (1997) with claims data for 2883 randomly selected, age- and sex-matched, non-bipolar patients, all covered under the same large private insurer in USA. Resource use (i.e. original and refill pharmaceutical dispensing, medical and procedural services received, inpatient hospitalization, outpatient services, physician visits and emergency room treatment) and their costs are described overall, as well as by bipolar disorder diagnosis (based on ICD-9 codes) and type of care (i.e. mental health versus non-mental health). RESULTS: Bipolar patients utilized nearly three to four times the health care resources and incurred over four times greater costs per patient compared with the non-bipolar group during the 1-year period ($7663 versus $1962). Inpatient care (hospitalizations) accounted for the greatest disparity between groups, as it was the single-most costly resource in the bipolar group ($2779 versus $398). Patients with bipolar depression (among the single bipolar diagnostic categories of mixed, manic or depressed) incurred the highest health care costs. While mental health care cost was a significant component of total cost in the bipolar group, it accounted for only 22% of the total per-patient cost; in comparison, it accounted for only 6% of the total per-patient cost in the non-bipolar group. CONCLUSION: Treatment of bipolar disorder, particularly inpatient care, is costly to patients and health insurers. Further study is needed to find ways to reduce the overall cost of managing these patients without jeopardizing patient care.
Medicaid provides health care insurance for low-income children, some parents who meet income thresholds, pregnant women, the elderly and the disabled. In order to receive federal funds for Medicaid, each state must offer coverage for the following health care services: inpatient and outpatient hospital services; physician services; medical and surgical dental services; nursing facility services; home health care services; family planning services; rural health clinic services; laboratory and x-ray services; pediatric and family nurse practitioner services; federally qualified health center services; nurse-midwife services; and early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) services for individuals under age 21. States can also choose to cover certain additional services under their Medicaid plans, and these often include prescription drugs, dental services (nonmedical or surgical), clinic services, and vision and hearing services. It is up to each state to decide what optional services to include with the mandated services to create their Medicaid benefit package.
Medicaid provides health care insurance for low-income children, some parents who meet income thresholds, pregnant women, the elderly and the disabled. In order to receive federal funds for Medicaid, each state must offer coverage for the following health care services: inpatient and outpatient hospital services; physician services; medical and surgical dental services; nursing facility services; home health care services; family planning services; rural health clinic services; laboratory and x-ray services; pediatric and family nurse practitioner services; federally qualified health center services; nurse-midwife services; and early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) services for individuals under age 21. States can also choose to cover certain additional services under their Medicaid plans, and these often include prescription drugs, dental services (nonmedical or surgical), clinic services, and vision and hearing services. It is up to each state to decide what optional services to include with the mandated services to create their Medicaid benefit package.
Medicaid provides health care insurance for low-income children, some parents who meet income thresholds, pregnant women, the elderly and the disabled. In order to receive federal funds for Medicaid, each state must offer coverage for the following health care services: inpatient and outpatient hospital services; physician services; medical and surgical dental services; nursing facility services; home health care services; family planning services; rural health clinic services; laboratory and x-ray services; pediatric and family nurse practitioner services; federally qualified health center services; nurse-midwife services; and early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) services for individuals under age 21. States can also choose to cover certain additional services under their Medicaid plans, and these often include prescription drugs, dental services (nonmedical or surgical), clinic services, and vision and hearing services. It is up to each state to decide what optional services to include with the mandated services to create their Medicaid benefit package.
Medicaid provides health care insurance for low-income children, some parents who meet income thresholds, pregnant women, the elderly and the disabled. In order to receive federal funds for Medicaid, each state must offer coverage for the following health care services: inpatient and outpatient hospital services; physician services; medical and surgical dental services; nursing facility services; home health care services; family planning services; rural health clinic services; laboratory and x-ray services; pediatric and family nurse practitioner services; federally qualified health center services; nurse-midwife services; and early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) services for individuals under age 21. States can also choose to cover certain additional services under their Medicaid plans, and these often include prescription drugs, dental services (nonmedical or surgical), clinic services, and vision and hearing services. It is up to each state to decide what optional services to include with the mandated services to create their Medicaid benefit package.