SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a common disease in young women being evaluated for infertility. Although endometriosis may cause tubal abnormalities on hysterosalpingography, efficacy of radiographic evaluation in this disease is not clear. We reviewed the radiographic and laparoscopic examinations in 50 women being studied for infertility. Laparoscopy was normal in 15 women and showed endometriosis in 35 patients. Endometriosis was staged at laparoscopy using the classification of the American Fertility Society. Radiographic examinations were reviewed blindly and tubal status noted in each patient. Criteria for tubal abnormality included incomplete or absent filling and ampullary dilatation or convolution. Radiographic efficacy was determined by correlating the tubal appearance to the severity and location of endometriosis. A total of 98 tubes were correlated but only 10 (10%) were felt to be involved by endometriosis based on laparoscopic findings. Radiologic sensitivity was 40% (4 of 10) and specificity was 83% (73 of 88). Positive predictive value was 21% (4 of 19) due to 15 false-positive diagnoses in tubes uninvolved by endometriosis. In conclusion, endometriosis, regardless of its severity, rarely causes radiographic abnormalities on hysterosalpingography because of the location of disease in the pelvis.

Adult↗

PubMed1976

Radiation exposure of ovaries during hysterosalpingography.

Radiation exposure to an area approximating the location of the ovaries was measured in 29 patients undergoing hysterosalpingography. A thermoluminescent crystal technique was used for some patients; a pocket dosimeter placed into the upper vagina was used for additional patients. Radiation dosage varied from 75 to 550 millirads. The weight of the patient did not affect the amount of radiation delivered to the gonads. The duration of fluroscopic time was the major factor increasing dosage. A discussion of hysterodalpingographic technique and suggestions for decreasing gonadal irradiation during hysterosalpingography are included.

Body Weight↗

PubMed1989

Radionuclide hysterosalpingography for measurement of human oviductal function.

A clinical method is described and claimed to evaluate the active transportation capacity of the luminal epithelium lining the human uterus and fallopian tube. After intracervical application of technetium-labelled human albumin spheres at 1-2 days before ovulation this radioactivity could be followed by gamma-camera when moved in ad ovarian direction. This method is called radionuclide hysterosalpingography (RN-HSG). The results were compared to the findings at normal hysterosalpingography (HSG). By use of this method it was possible to verify active passage in cases of tubal spasm at HSG, lack of transport in cases of normal patent oviducts at HSG as well as presence or absence of active transport through sactosalpinges with or without fimbrial passages to the abdominal cavity as seen at normal HSG. Congruent findings between HSG and RN-HSG was observed in 49%. The studied oviducts were found to be patent with normal HSG but lacked transportation capacity when studied by RN-HSG in 41%. The clinical use of this method is discussed in view of the selection of patients for different forms of in vitro fertilization and egg transfer (IVF-ET).

Adult↗

PubMed1982

Incidence of pathological factors not revealed by hysterosalpingography but disclosed by laparoscopy in 500 infertile women.

Hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy were performed in 500 infertile women. Results obtained by both techniques were compared. Taking into consideration only the tubal patency, the present study shows an agreement in 90% of cases. In total of 980 fallopian tubes examined, fimbrial conglutination was suspected in 79 tubes (8%) and diagnosed by laparoscopy in 154 tubes (15.7%). Peritubal adhesions with tubal patency are a frequent pathology (23.8%) and hysterosalpingography alone permits the diagnosis in only 68.8% of the cases confirmed by laparoscopy. Other additional findings by laparoscopy are frequent: endometriosis was found in 124 women. Isolated periovarian adhesions were disclosed in 48 women. The high incidence of unsuspected pathology is an additional support in favor of laparoscopy in each case of infertility.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Mullerian duct anomalies are an uncommon but often a treatable cause of infertility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2002 until November 2003, a total of 705 hysterosalpingographies were realised of which 658 were analysed retrospectively in order to determine the importance of uterine malformations in infertile and sterile patients. In ten cases, the results of hysterosalpingography were compared with hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. RESULTS: The frequency of uterine malformations in infertile and sterile women was 10%. In this population, arcuate uterus (57.6%) was the most common malformation, followed by subseptate uterus (18.2%), uterus bicornis unicollis (10.6%), uterus bicornis bicollis (3.0%), septate uterus (6.1%), unicornuate uterus (3.0%) and unicornuate uterus with double vagina (1.5%). DISCUSSION: Our bibliographic research confirmed that arcuate uterus is the most frequent congenital malformation, but in gestations it does not show a significantly reduced live birth rate. Nevertheless, the septate uterus presents an important decrease of live birth rate that can be improved significantly by doing hysteroscopic metroplasty. As this is a completely different surgical intervention compared to bicornuate uterus, a correct diagnosis is very important. Differentiation of these two malformations is quite difficult by hysterosalpingographic exploration, wherefore an additional exploration by means of endovaginal or three-dimensional ultrasound is recommended.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Gadolinium radiologic contrast is a useful alternative for hysterosalpingography in patients with iodine allergy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the successful use of gadolinium radiologic contrast for hysterosalpingography. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Outpatient care in a private practice setting. PATIENT(S): One female patient entering and finishing study. INTERVENTION(S): Hysterosalpingogram. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Interpretability of radiological imaging. RESULT(S): Visualization of a normal uterine cavity and fallopian tubes with bilateral patency was confirmed during the procedure. Radiologic films were created that document the results. The best visualization of the internal pelvic anatomy was noted during the actual procedure. There was a lighter image noted on the films taken from the use of gadolinium rather than the traditional iodinated contrast. CONCLUSION(S): Gadolinium is a safe and useful alternative to iodinated contrast for hysterosalpingography in patients with iodine allergy.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

[Radiologically-guided hysterosalpingography and tubal catheterization].

Radiological exploration of hypofertility by means of hysterosalpingography is a method still valid but no longer sufficient. Tubal catheterization has thus become a necessary complementary exam in order to eliminate the pseudo-obturations of hysterosalpingography and, in case of proximal tubal obstructions, to obtain pregnancies. The conditions for the realization of hysteroalpingography and tubal catheterization are hereby described, with emphasis on the rigorous technique that is required together with careful listening to the patients.

Catheterization↗

PubMed2002

Transcervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether transcervical intrauterine topical instillation of a local anesthetic agent reduces pain at hysterosalpingography. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Department of reproductive medicine at a university teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): One hundred ten women undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG). INTERVENTION(S): Subjects were randomized to receive either 2 mL of 2% plain lignocaine or 2 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution (placebo) topically into the uterine cavity before the HSG was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The degree of lower abdominal pain experienced both during the injection of contrast media at HSG and 10 minutes after the procedure using a 20-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and a four-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS). RESULT(S): There was no difference in pain scores between lignocaine and placebo during the HSG. However, at 10 minutes after the HSG, subjects receiving lignocaine experienced more pain than those on placebo. CONCLUSION(S): Transcervical intrauterine topical instillation of 2 mL of 2% plain lignocaine does not reduce pain during HSG and may lead to increased pain immediately after the procedure.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed1975

Correlation between hysterosalpingography and pelvic endoscopy for the evaluation of tubal factor.

In this study of 132 infertile couples, findings with hysterosalpingography (HSG) were compared with those observed at subsequent culdoscopy or laparoscopy. Both procedures correctly revealed normal tubes in 29% of the subjects and identical abnormalities in 24%. A complete agreement between the two procedures was thus observed in 53% of women. Hysterosalpingography showed 5% false positive and 14% false negative findings. In the remaining cases the type of anomaly revealed by HSG was different from that found at laparoscopy. Peritubal adhesion was the pathologic process most commonly missed by HSG and diagnosed subsequently by endoscopy. Pelvic endoscopy also revealed endometriosis and other pelvic disease in a high proportion of women, whereas HSG exclusively detected all intrauterine lesions. Similar pregnancy rates resulted when HSG and endoscopy revealed normal organs. The significance of these findings is discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed1979

The value of hysterosalpingography prior to donor artificial insemination.

The value of hysterosalpingography as a tool in the pretreatment evaluation of candidates for donor artificial insemination has been retrospectively evaluated. In 89 consecutive artificial inseminations by donor candidates, hysterosalpingograms were evaluated for genital tract abnormalities. In only four of these studies was there a failure of dye to spill into the peritoneal cavity. The low incidence of significantly abnormal hysterosalpingographic studies, and the failure of these studies to correlate with pregnancy outcome, strongly argues against the use of hysterosalpingography in the preliminary evaluation of the patient considered for donor artificial insemination.

Adult↗

PubMed1980

Febrile morbidity following hysterosalpingography: identification of risk factors and recommendations for prophylaxis.

Although previous large series have reported that from 0.3% to 1.3% of patients undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) develop infectious morbidity, our impression was that the incidence was higher among our patients. Therefore the records of 448 consecutive healthy women who underwent HSG were examined. Within 24 hours after the HSG, 14 of these 448 patients (3.1%) developed fever and pelvic peritonitis requiring hospitalization and treatment with parenteral antibiotics, a significantly greater frequency than reported elsewhere (P less than 0.01). Traditional laboratory tests failed to predict patients at risk, and prophylactic antibiotics effective against aerobic organisms could not protect against this complication. However, it was possible to design a scoring system based on specific findings in the history and previous physical examinations that was capable of identifying patients who would subsequently become infected. The clinical sensitivity of this scoring technique is 57%, clinical specificity 99%, and test efficiency 97%. It is suggested that in view of the major risk of post-HSG infection in certain identifiable women and because of the impact of this complication on their future fertility, hysterosalpingography should not be performed in those patients determined to be at high risk. In women at lowest risk, the procedure is safe. Finally, in patients assigned an intermediate risk-score, the risk-benefit ratio must be carefully weighed and discussed with the patient, and prophylactic antibiotics with anaerobic coverage should be considered.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Standardization of hysterosalpingography and selective salpingography: a valuable adjunct to simple opacification studies.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between opacification and perfusion pressures during hysterosalpingography (HSG) and selective salpingography under the assumption that the latter may add to the diagnostic capabilities of the procedures. DESIGN: Perfusion pressures were uniformly evaluated by standardizing injection volume per time interval of contrast medium and the delivery system. Pressures were measured in a closed system through a digital manometer and recorded on tracing paper. SETTING: Fully ambulatory gynecoradiology suite at academically affiliated infertility center. PATIENTS: Thirty infertility patients. INTERVENTION: Hysterosalpingography and selective salpingography for diagnostic purposes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation between opacification patterns and perfusion pressures. RESULTS: The evaluation of perfusion pressures during HSG is unreliable because they may be affected by uterine factors and will only reflect the oviduct of least resistance. In contrast, perfusion pressures during selective salpingography are reflective of only the investigated tube. They appear to lie within a functionally normal range of up to 350 mm Hg. Tubes by opacification judged as normal exhibited a pressure range of 429 +/- 376 mm Hg, which was significantly lower than that of abnormally appearing oviducts (957 +/- 445 mm Hg; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The concomitant performance of perfusion pressure studies during selective salpingography further enhances the diagnostic capability of selective salpingography over HSG in the diagnostic evaluation of fallopian tubes.

Female↗

PubMed1994

A meta-analysis of the therapeutic role of oil soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography: a surprising result?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of oil-soluble contrast media compared with water-soluble contrast media after hysterosalpingography (HSG) in infertile couples. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and six nonrandomized controlled studies evaluating pregnancy rates after the use of oil- or water-soluble contrast media during HSG. SETTING: Institute of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Leeds, United Kingdom. PATIENTS: Four identified RCTs studied 800 patients and six nonrandomized studies comprised an additional 1,806 patients, all experiencing primary or secondary infertility. INTERVENTION: Hysterosalpingography as part of infertility investigation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pregnancy rates after HSG. RESULTS: Pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the oil-soluble contrast media group compared with the water-soluble contrast media group in the RCTs. Inclusion of the six nonrandomized studies did not alter this conclusion. This apparent benefit was greatest for patients with unexplained infertility. CONCLUSIONS: Oil-soluble contrast media have a therapeutic effect compared with water-soluble media and this effect is greatest for patients who have been diagnosed as having unexplained infertility. New techniques for the evaluation of tubal patency support the hypothesis that tubal "plugs" may be involved in proximal tubal blockage.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1995

The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in diagnosing tubal patency and peritubal adhesions using laparoscopy with chromopertubation as the gold standard. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of 20 studies comparing HSG and laparoscopy for tubal patency and peritubal adhesions. PATIENTS: Four thousand one hundred seventy-nine patients with infertility in 20 studies. INTERVENTION: Hysterosalpingography and diagnostic laparoscopy as part of infertility workup. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tubal patency and peritubal adhesions. RESULTS: For tubal patency the reported sensitivity and specificity differed between studies. In a subset of studies that evaluated HSG and laparoscopy independently, a point estimate of 0.65 for sensitivity and 0.83 for specificity was calculated. For peritubal adhesions a summary receiver operating characteristic curve could be estimated. CONCLUSIONS: Although HSG is of limited use for detecting tubal patency because of its low sensitivity, its high specificity makes it a useful test for ruling in tubal obstruction. For the evaluation of peritubal adhesions HSG is not reliable.

Fallopian Tube Diseases↗

PubMed1997

"Crushed glass" appearance of particles observed in roentgenograms after hysterosalpingography as an indicator of pelvic abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of the crushed glass appearance of particles observed on roentgenogram after hysterosalpingography in patients with pelvic abnormalities. DESIGN: Retrospective study of 32 patients whose roentgenogram had particles with a crushed glass appearance and 16 patients without crushed glass appearance, with laparoscopy conducted to determine the location and severity of the pelvic disease. SETTING: Fujita Health University Hospital, Aichi, Japan. PATIENT(S): A total of 240 patients underwent hysterosalpingography to determine the cause of infertility. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We compared the location of the pelvic endometriosis and/or inflammation that was observed on roentgenogram as the crushed glass appearance versus definitive findings at laparoscopy. RESULT(S): A total of 30 of the 32 cases (93.8%) with the crushed glass appearance were confirmed as having pelvic abnormalities, such as endometriosis (73.3%) and pelvic inflammation (26.7%). The rate of the concurrence of the location of the crushed glass appearance observed on the film and that of the lesions verified by laparoscopy was 66.7%. Histopathological examination showed that specimens taken from endometriosis or inflammatory lesions that comprised the crushed glass appearance were lacking in epithelium in proportion to the size of the particles. CONCLUSION(S): Identification of the crushed glass appearance of particles was a useful noninvasive method of detecting pelvic abnormalities, such as pelvic endometriosis and inflammation, in infertile women.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in predicting fertility outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic significance of hysterosalpingography (HSG) for fertility outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Infertility department of an academic hospital. PATIENT(S): Consecutive patients undergoing HSG for subfertility between May 1985 and November 1987. INTERVENTION(S): Hysterosalpingography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Follow-up ended when pregnancy or tubal surgery occurred or at the day of last contact. Kaplan-Meier curves for the occurrence of spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) were constructed for a normal HSG, a HSG with a one-sided abnormality, and a HSG with a two-sided abnormality. Fecundity rate ratios were calculated to express the association between HSG findings and the occurrence of spontaneous IUP. RESULT(S): Of 359 patients that were analyzed, 231 (64%) showed no tubal pathology on HSG, 67 (19%) had a one-sided tubal pathology, and 61 (17%) had a two-sided tubal pathology. The adjusted fecundity rate ratios were 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.4) for a one-sided pathology and 0.30 (95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.71) for a two-sided pathology. Correction for informative censoring and sensitivity analysis did not alter these results. CONCLUSION(S): One-sided tubal pathology detected on HSG has limited prognostic significance, whereas two-sided tubal pathology detected on HSG reduces fertility prospects considerably.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography (SHG) in uterine cavity diseases in infertile patients, comparing its results with those of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and transvaginal sonography (TVS). Hysteroscopy was the gold standard. DESIGN: Descriptive, prospective study. SETTING: A tertiary university referral center. PATIENT(S): Sixty-five infertile women 19 to 43 years of age. INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent SHG, conventional TVS, HSG, and hysteroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The results of each examination were compared with those obtained by the gold standard. The following diagnoses were considered separately: polypoid lesions, uterine malformations, intrauterine adhesions, and endometrial hyperplasia (EH). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULT(S): Sonohysterography had the same diagnostic accuracy as the gold standard for polypoid lesions and EH, with no equivocal diagnosis. Hysterosalpingography showed a sensitivity of 50% and a PPV of 28.6% for polypoid lesions and a sensitivity of 0% for EH. Transvaginal sonography had both sensitivity and PPV of 75% for polypoid lesions and EH. For uterine malformations, SHG had a sensitivity of 77.8%, whereas TVS and HSG both had a sensitivity of 44.4%. Sonohysterography and HSG had a sensitivity of 75% in the detection of intrauterine adhesions and respective PPVs of 42.9% and 50%. Transvaginal sonography showed sensitivity and PPV of 0% for this diagnosis. CONCLUSION(S): Sonohysterography was in general the most accurate test. Its diagnostic accuracy was markedly superior for polypoid lesions and EH, with total agreement with the gold standard. In diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions, SHG had limited accuracy, similar to that obtained by HSG, with a high false-positive diagnosis rate.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A prospective comparative study between hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the detection of intrauterine pathology in patients with infertility.

AIM: To investigate the accuracy of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in comparison to hysteroscopy in the detection of intrauterine pathology in patients with infertility, where hysteroscopy is the gold standard. METHODS: A prospective, comparative study included 336 patients undergoing both HSG and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy rate of HSG. RESULTS: Intrauterine abnormalities were shown on HSG in 286 patients and confirmed in 200 at hysteroscopy. Contrarily intrauterine lesions were detected by hysteroscopy in 4 out of 50 patients in whom HSG were normal. The most common intrauterine finding of 336 patients on hysteroscopy were intrauterine adhesions (IUA) (74), followed by endometrial polyps (56), and submucous myoma, 26 patients. Statistical analysis revealed that HSG in the detection of intrauterine pathology had a sensitivity of 98.0%, specificity of 34.9%, positive predictive value of 69.9%, negative predictive value of 92.0%, and accuracy rate of 73.2% with false-positive and false-negative rates of 30.1% and 8.0%, respectively. The common incorrect diagnoses of HSG were misdiagnosing a condition of cervical stenosis as severe IUA in 24 patients, endometrial polyps as submucous myoma in 22 out of 50 patients, and submucous myoma as endometrial polyps in 12 out of 72 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hysterosalpingography is still a useful screening test for the evaluation of the uterine cavity. If a hysterogram demonstrates intrauterine abnormalities, hysteroscopy should be considered to make a definite diagnosis and treatment. Both procedures should be complementary to each other.

Adolescent↗