[Health insurance and health affairs].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Catastrophic health insurance may be necessary to curb rising health care costs in the United States. A major factor in this rise has been the current structure of the nation's health insurance system, which inadequately protects individuals with expensive illnesses, but encourages over-insurance for less expensive illnesses. This Note examines the current health insurance system, and analyzes its impact on health care costs for individuals and society. It evaluates several proposals to modify the structure of the current health insurance system, and recommends the adoption of a catastrophic health insurance plan based on an economic definition of catastrophe. Such a plan would decrease shallow coverage, and would use coinsurance and deductible rates keyed to the individual's income as means of increasing consumer cost consciousness without making necessary care unreasonably expensive. This Note also recommends that a catastrophic plan only cover treatment that has been determined medically necessary by utilization review, and that this review encourage outpatient rather than costly inpatient treatment.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined trends in health insurance coverage for health care workers and their children between 1988 and 1998. METHODS: We analyzed data from the annual March supplements of the Current Population Survey (CPS), a Census Bureau survey that collects information about health insurance from a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized US residents. RESULTS: Of the health care personnel younger than 65 years, 1.36 million (90% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 million, 1.45 million) were uninsured in 1998, up 83.4% from 1988; the proportion uninsured rose from 8.4% (90% CI = 7.8%, 9.1%) to 12.2% (90% CI = 11.5%, 12.9%). Declining coverage rates in the growing private-sector health care workforce---and declining health employment in the public sector, which provided health insurance benefits to more of its workers---accounted for the increases. Households with a health care worker included 1.12 million (90% CI = 1.05 million, 1.20 million) uninsured children, accounting for 10.1% (90% CI = 9.5%, 10.8%) of all uninsured children in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Health care personnel are losing health insurance coverage more rapidly than are other workers. Increasingly, the health care sector is consigning its own workers and their children to the ranks of the uninsured.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Employers in the United States provide many welfare-type benefits, such as life insurance, disability insurance, health insurance, and pensions, to their employees. Employers can be viewed as performing an agency role in purchasing pension, health, and other welfare benefits for their employees. An exploration of their competence in this role as agents for their employees indicates that large employers are very helpful to their employees in this arena. They seem to contribute to individual employees' welfare by providing them with valued services in purchasing health insurance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To inform the debate about managed care by examining how different types of private insurance-indemnity insurance, PPOs, open model HMOs, and closed model HMOs-affect the use of health services and consumer assessments of care. DATA SOURCES/DATA COLLECTION: The 1996-1997 Community Tracking Study Household Survey, a nationally representative telephone survey of households, and the Community Tracking Study Insurance Followback Survey, a supplement to the Household Survey, which asks insurance organizations to match household respondents to specific insurance products. The analysis sample includes 27,257 nonelderly individuals covered by private insurance. STUDY DESIGN: Based on insurer reports, individuals are grouped into one of the four insurance product types. Measures of service use include ambulatory visits, preventive care use, hospital use, surgeries, specialist use, and whether there is a usual source of care. Consumer assessments of care include unmet or delayed care needs, satisfaction with health care, ratings of the last physician visit, and trust in physicians. Estimates are adjusted to control for differences in individual characteristics and location. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: As one moves from indemnity insurance to PPOs to open model HMOs to closed model HMOs, use of primary care increases modestly but use of specialists is reduced. Few differences are observed in other areas of service use, such as preventive care, hospital use, and surgeries. The likelihood of having unmet or delayed care does not vary by insurance type, but the reasons that underlie such access problems do vary: enrollees in more managed products are less likely to cite financial barriers to care but are more likely to perceive problems in provider access, convenience, and organizational factors. Consumer assessments of care-including satisfaction with care, ratings of the last physician visit, and trust in physicians-are generally lower under more managed products, particularly closed model HMOs. CONCLUSIONS: The type of insurance that people have-not just whether it is managed care but the type of managed care-affects their use of services and their assessments of the care they receive. Consumers and policymakers should be reminded that managed care encompasses a variety of types of insurance products that have different effects and may require different policy responses.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As a financing mechanism with the potential to raise additional funds for health services, whilst improving access to services amongst the poor, non-profit health insurance has become increasingly attractive to health policy-makers. Using data from a household survey in Vietnam, out of pocket health expenditure are compared between members and eligible non-members of the government-implemented voluntary health insurance scheme. Expenditures are analysed for individuals who sought care during their most recent illness. Using an endogenous dummy variable model to control for bias resulting from self-selection into the scheme, we find that health insurance reduces average out-of-pocket expenditures by approximately 200%. Whilst income inelastic, health expenditures are found to be significantly influenced by an individuals level of income, irrespective of insurance status. Despite this, insurance reduces expenditures significantly more for the poor than for the rich.
We examine the roles that insurance coverage, the delivery system, and external factors play in explaining persistent disparities in access among racial and ethnic groups of all ages. Using data from the 1996-1999 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys and regression-based decomposition methods, we find that our measures of health care system capacity explain little and that while insurance clearly matters, external factors are equally important. Employment, job characteristics, and marital status are key determinants of disparities in access to insurance but are difficult for health policy to affect directly. Much of existing disparities remains unexplained, presenting a challenge to developing policies to eliminate them.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the health insurance characteristics of a sample of persons with rheumatic diseases, to review their evaluations of health care, and to identify the health insurance characteristics associated with those evaluations. METHODS: Data were obtained from a mail survey of a random sample of persons (n = 2,484) on mailing lists of participating rheumatic disease organizations. The survey included specific aspects of health insurance coverage, demographic and health status information, and evaluations of health care. RESULTS: In California, managed care plans (MCPs) were providing health care to 59% of respondents under age 65. Among respondents under age 65, prescription drug coverage was almost universal, 60% had seen a plan rheumatologist, and 17% had been unable to obtain referrals to specialists (with significantly more respondents in MCPs reporting this problem). Among respondents age > or =65, 37% had seen a plan rheumatologist, and 11% reported being unable to obtain referrals to specialists. Overall, drug coverage was less common in this age group, although 90% of those in MCPs had drug coverage. Relatively few respondents in either age group knew about coverage for physical or occupational therapy or for assistive devices. Patient evaluations were more positive for non-MCPs. Limitation in access to physicians was the strongest predictor of poor evaluations of health plans and physician care. Having seen a plan rheumatologist was associated with more positive evaluations. CONCLUSION: Surveys of patient satisfaction or patient evaluations are required by many regulatory bodies. Managed care organizations should carefully evaluate whether limitations in access or services are worth the generalized negative perceptions that they may create among patients.
The relationship between physician and patient has become multi-dimensional due to the inclusion of state offices, health insurance companies and other insurance companies. Thus, the medical confidentiality has been compromised, inevitably information will be spread into a wider circle. Nevertheless, the principle of confidentiality should be upheld.
The goal of this research was to develop and evaluate a way to measure the value people place on various medical services in their decisions about what health insurance should cover. A vignette approach to measuring consumer values was developed. People were asked to assign priority and desire to have insurance cover 64 different services. A national probability sample of 206 adults was interviewed by telephone. Their ratings were compared with those of a sample of 47 corporate benefits officers of Fortune 500 companies. Priorities were not significantly associated with respondent characteristics. They were positively correlated with independent assessments of the seriousness of the patient's condition and the likely efficacy of the services. Priorities and desire to cover were virtually the same when respondents were asked about insurance for a low-income population as for a general population. Two-thirds of the ratings of the public were the same as those of benefit officers. The public gave higher ratings than benefits officers to long-term care and services to relieve worries, and the public gave lower ratings to the value of treatment of substance abuse and services when the patient could be viewed as at fault. This pilot test indicates this is an efficient, feasible, useful strategy for measuring the extent to which people value various medical services that could contribute to the process of making decisions about health insurance coverage.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Private health insurance can play a significant role in the financing and delivery of health services in relatively undeveloped health systems which suffer from limited public expenditures, resource shortages, and quality of care problems. Research results, however, indicate that private health insurance in Greece has not yet assumed that role. The rapid increase of private health insurance was the result of underfinancing by the public sector and restrictive policies for the private sector. The private sector, however, largely financed by private health insurance, found alternative investment and profit opportunities, which, unfortunately, did not improve health system microeconomic efficiency. In this paper we propose that a way of cooperation could exist between the public sector and private health insurance, which would improve public health services provision and the overall technical, allocative and dynamic efficiency of the health system.