PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Inguinal hernia”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Giant inguinal hernia.

Giant inguinal herniae present a major challenge in management. This case details clinical features of an enormous inguinoscrotal hernia associated with septic gangrene and elephantiasis of the scrotum. Two initial operations were required for control of sepsis, followed by a two-staged hernial repair, involving a total colectomy and a subsequent neoscrotal repair. The problems of loss of domain within the abdominal cavity and the special features presented by this case are discussed.

Colectomy↗

Inguinal hernia repair.

Inguinal hernia repair has been evolving for the past 130 years and the pace of evolution accelerated in the last decade with the introduction of the tension-free repair, the laparoscopic repair and the growth of the specialist hernia clinic. The evolution continues and this article sets out to describe the author's approach at the time of writing.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗

[Adequacy of hospital admissions and stays of patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernia].

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia uncomplicated in patients aged over 17 years, diagnosis-related group (DRG) 162, generates a substantial number of hospital stays due its high frequency in our country. These stays may not be necessary, and present an important temporal and geographical variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have analyzed a total of 612 days of stay belonging to the 124 admissions codified as DRG 162 during the first quarter of 1993 and 1994, using the "Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol". RESULTS: The overall mean stay of the DRG 162 was 5.0 days (2.3 days of inadequate stay and 2.7 days of clinically necessary stay). The mean stay in 1993, 5.6 days, was higher than the mean stay in 1994, 4.1 days (p = 0.006). The percentage of inappropriate admission was higher in 1993 than in 1994 (33.8% versus 18.9%; p = 0.06). Similarly, the percentage of inappropriate stay was higher in 1993 than in 1994 (46.9% versus 41.9%; p = 0.06). The more frequent reasons of inappropriate admission was premature admission (88.2%) and for the stay was delay in the discharge medical order (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The mean stay of DRG 162, as well as the percentage of inadequate stay and admission, has decreased from 1993 to 1994 in our hospital. According to the observed trend, the mean stay is approaching the adequate mean stay for this DRG.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗

[10 years' experience using a modified Shouldice surgical technic for inguinal hernia in adults. II. Which factors modify the recurrence of inguinal hernia?].

Many factors seem to influence the recurrence rate after adult inguinal hernia repair. A statistical analysis of data derived from 726 transversalis fascia repairs examined by the authors (with a follow-up rate of 82.5% and a mean follow-up time of 5.5 years) revealed a significantly higher recurrence rate in patients with chronic bronchitis (p less than 0.05) or with postoperative complications (p less than 0.001). Lower recurrence rates were found after resection of lipomas of the cord (p less than 0.01) or cremasteric muscle resection (p less than 0.05). No significant difference of recurrence rate could be established for following parameters: Sex, side, age distribution, profession, prostatism, obesity, type of hernia (direct, indirect, combined, sliding), suture material (silk, polyglycolic acid), surgeon, anesthesia (local, spinal, full), elective or emergency operation, and whether the repair was unilateral or simultaneously bilateral. Recurrent repairs showed no significantly higher recurrence rate than primary repairs.

Adult↗

Occurrence of contralateral inguinal hernia in children following unilateral inguinal herniotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the occurrence of contralateral inguinal hernia in infants and children who presented with unilateral inguinal hernia and underwent herniotomy in order to establish whether simultaneous contralateral exploration is a necessity in our environment. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Muhimbili National Hospital Paediatric surgical ward. SUBJECTS: Seven hundred and thirty two children. RESULTS: Twenty five infants and children developed an inguinal hernia on the contralateral side 2-76 months after herniotomy. Follow-up period was one to thirteen years. Six hundred and seventy one were boys and sixty one girls (M:F = 11:1). Right side presentation was seen in two-thirds of the children. Subsequent contralateral hernia occurrence was more common in girls (4.9%) and slightly higher in children above 12 months of age (3.5%) but these comparisons were not significant (p values were 0.45 and 0.89 and R.R. values were 0.97 and 0.67 respectively). Subsequent development of contra lateral hernia in children with left-sided hernia was high (6.7%) and this was statistically significant (p = 0.002, R.R. = 3.38). CONCLUSION: The risk of occurrence of contra-lateral inguinal hernia following unilateral inguinal herniotomy is not significantly excessive when compared by age or sex implying that routine exploration on the contralateral side in infants and children clinically presenting with unilateral inguinal hernia is not justified and we recommend herniotomy only when there is adequate clinical evidence of an inguinal hernia. Despite the significant risk of developing a contralateral hernia in children with left-sided hernia, the authors do not recommend routine right-sided exploration as the frequency is not high.

Child↗

CT-Derived pelvic morphometry for preoperative risk assessment of recurrent unilateral inguinal hernia.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent inguinal hernia remains a significant challenge in abdominal wall surgery despite advances in mesh-based repair techniques and minimally invasive approaches. Although pelvic skeletal morphology has been implicated in inguinal hernia development, its association with recurrent disease remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate computed tomography (CT)-derived pelvic morphometric parameters and investigate their potential value in preoperative recurrence risk assessment. METHODS: This retrospective study included 251 male patients with preoperative abdominal CT examinations and complete clinical records who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair at a tertiary referral center. After applying the predefined eligibility criteria, 188 patients with unilateral inguinal hernias constituted the primary study cohort, including 162 primary and 26 recurrent unilateral hernias. The Radoievitch angle and Ami's line were measured independently by two blinded radiology residents using a standardized CT-based pelvic morphometric measurement protocol, and the mean values were used for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the association between pelvic morphometric parameters and recurrent inguinal hernia. RESULTS: Patients with recurrent unilateral inguinal hernias demonstrated significantly greater affected-side Ami's line measurements (8.27 ± 0.63 vs. 7.90 ± 0.71 cm, p = 0.014) and larger Radoievitch angles (40.68 ± 4.02° vs. 38.80 ± 3.68°, p = 0.018) than patients with primary unilateral hernias. Both the Radoievitch angle (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.033) and Ami's line (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.14-4.49, p = 0.020) remained independently associated with recurrent inguinal hernia after adjustment for age and body mass index. ROC analysis demonstrated modest discriminatory performance (AUC 0.634 for the Radoievitch angle and 0.633 for Ami's line), while the multivariable model incorporating age, body mass index, and Ami's line showed slightly improved discrimination (AUC 0.655). CONCLUSION: CT-derived pelvic morphometric parameters were independently associated with recurrent unilateral inguinal hernia. Although their individual discriminatory performance was modest, standardized CT-based pelvimetry may serve as an objective adjunctive tool for individualized preoperative recurrence risk assessment in patients who already undergo CT imaging for unrelated clinical indications. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings and determine their clinical applicability.

Humans↗

The herniographic appearance of direct inguinal hernias in adults.

Inguinal hernias can be demonstrated by positive contrast herniography in children and adults. In this latter age-group direct inguinal hernias are frequent and can appear with different location and shape. In this series of 39 inguinal hernias in 25 adults five different types could be distinguished, according to location. Lateral direct inguinal hernias were found protruding in an anterior direction from the medial inguinal fossa. Inguinofemoral hernias protruded in a mainly inferior direction from the medial inguinal fossa. Medial direct inguinal hernias protruded from the lateral region of the supravesical fossa just medial to the medial inguinal fold. Diverticular direct inguinal hernias were located in the medial aspect of the supravesical fossa. Supravesical inguinal hernias were located in the mid-line. The distinction between these direct hernias and their relation to and distinction from other hernias in the inguinal region is discussed.

Adolescent↗

A survey of preferred approach to inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or inguinal incision?

The recent interest in laparoscopic surgery has raised some concerns that large numbers of surgeons were recommending this "minimally invasive" approach in procedures such as inguinal herniorrhaphy before the availability of adequate data regarding safety and benefits. To determine current experience and preference levels for laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy (LH), we conducted a mail survey of New Jersey surgeons. Of 531 respondents, 430 (81%) preferred a traditional inguinal incision approach over a laparoscopic approach (8%). Of 344 general surgeon respondents, 227 (66%) had experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but only 56 (16%) had experience with LH. This latter group had performed only an average of 9.2 laparoscopic herniorrhaphies, with a median of five cases. Most of these 56 surgeons with LH experience indicated a preference for inguinal incision herniorrhaphy although 19 surgeons who had performed 10 or more LH cases showed a slight preference for LH (11 to 8). The primary reasons for choosing LH included "less pain" and "quicker recovery." The primary reasons for choosing inguinal incision herniorrhaphy included having a "better known procedure" and avoiding general anesthesia. Our survey indicates that the laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair has currently accumulated few proponents in the surgical community since many surgeons are waiting for more data on the procedure.

Hernia, Inguinal↗

Inguinal hernia in patients with Ewing sarcoma: a clue to etiology.

BACKGROUND: Various congenital anomalies have been associated with childhood cancer, but as yet no anomaly has been consistently found with Ewing sarcoma (ES). Recently a large case-control study of ES patients reported a greater number of hernias in both cases and their sibling controls than in population controls. Most of these hernias were inguinal. Because these anomalies were also reported previously in two case series, we looked for inguinal hernias in a different population of ES patients. PROCEDURE: We abstracted medical records for 306 pathologically confirmed ES/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) patients seen at NIH between 1960 and 1992. Epidemiological data on demographics and medical conditions were analyzed. The frequency of anomalies was compared to expected rates to calculate relative risk and confidence intervals. RESULTS: Anomalies were present in 67 (22%) cases. A particular anomaly, inguinal hernia, was reported for 13 (5%) NIH cases. Compared to population estimates for white children, the relative risk of inguinal hernia among white NIH cases was 13.3 (95% CI 3.60-34.1) for females and 6.67 (95% CI 2.67-13.7) for males. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of inguinal hernias in some patients with ES suggest that a disruption in normal embryological development occurred. This may provide an important clue to the etiology of ES. We hypothesize that these hernias may relate to an in utero exposure or indicate an underlying genetic disorder. Future studies should carefully evaluate ES families for genetic disease and explore environmental factors. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 34:195-199, 2000. Published 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Adolescent↗

Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is the most frequently performed operation in general surgery. The standard method for inguinal hernia repair had changed little over a hundred years until the introduction of synthetic mesh. This mesh can be placed by either using an open approach or by using a minimal access laparoscopic technique. Although many studies have explored the relative merits and potential risks of laparoscopic surgery for the repair of inguinal hernia, most individual trials have been too small to show clear benefits of one type of surgical repair over another. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to compare minimal access laparoscopic mesh techniques with open techniques. Comparisons of open mesh techniques versus open non-mesh techniques have been considered in a separate Cochrane review. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Registry for relevant randomised controlled trials. The reference list of identified trials, journal supplements, relevant book chapters and conference proceedings were searched for further relevant trials. Through the EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (EUHTC) communication took place with authors of identified randomised controlled trials to ask for information on any other recent and ongoing trials known to them. Specialists involved in research on the repair of inguinal hernia were contacted to ask for information about any further completed and ongoing trials. The world wide web was also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic groin hernia repair with open groin hernia repair were eligible for inclusion. Trials were included irrespective of the language in which they were reported. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Individual patient data were obtained, where possible, from the responsible trialist for all eligible studies. All reanalyses were cross-checked by the reviewers and verified by the trialists before inclusion. Where IPD were unavailable additional aggregate data were sought from trialists and published aggregate data checked and verified by the trialists. IPD were available for 25 trials, additional aggregated data for seven and published data only for nine. Where possible, time to event analysis for hernia recurrence and return to usual activities were performed on an intention to treat principle. The main analyses were based on all trials. Sensitivity analyses based on the data source and trial quality were also performed. Pre-defined subgroup analyses based on recurrent hernias, bilateral hernias and femoral hernias were also carried out. MAIN RESULTS: 41 published reports of eligible trials were included involving 7161 participants. Sample sizes ranged from 38 to 994, with follow-up from 6 weeks to 36 months. Duration of operation was longer in the laparoscopic groups (WMD 14.81 minutes, 95% CI 13.98 to 15.64; p<0001). Operative complications were uncommon for both methods but more frequent in the laparoscopic group for visceral (Overall 8/2315 versus 1/2599) and vascular (Overall 7/2498 versus 5/2758) injuries. Length of hospital stay did not differ between groups (WMD -0.04 days, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.00; p=0.05, but return to usual activity was earlier for laparoscopic groups (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.51 to 0.61; p<0.0001 - equivalent to 7 days). The data available showed less persisting pain (Overall 290/2101 versus 459/2399; Peto OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.64; p<0.0001), and less persisting numbness (Overall 102/1419 versus 217/1624; Peto OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.4286 to 0.49; p<0.0001) in the laparoscopic groups. In total, 86 recurrences were reported amongst 3138 allocated laparoscopic repair and 109 amongst 3504 allocated to open repair (Peto OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.08; p = 0.16). The use of mesh during laparoscopic hernia repair is associated with a reduction in the risk of hernia recurrence, significantly so for the transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) versus open non-mesh repair (overall 26/1440 versus preperitoneal repair (TAPP) versus open non-mesh repair (overall 26/1440 versus 47/1119; Peto OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.72; p=0.0009). However, no difference was detected when comparing laparoscopic methods with open mesh methods of hernia repair. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of mesh during laparoscopic hernia repair is associated with a relative reduction in the risk of hernia recurrence of around 30-50%. However, there is no apparent difference in recurrence between laparoscopic and open mesh methods of hernia repair. The data suggests less persisting pain and numbness following laparoscopic repair. Return to usual activities is faster. However, operation times are longer and there appears to be a higher risk of serious complication rate in respect of visceral (especially bladder) and vascular injuries.

Hernia, Inguinal↗

Prospective study of open preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent inguinal hernia presents a significant clinical problem with high re-recurrence and complication rates, particularly when an anterior approach is used. This study evaluated the open preperitoneal approach for repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 101 consecutive patients with 114 recurrent inguinal hernias. All were operated on using an open preperitoneal technique and prosthetic mesh by the method of Stoppa or Wantz. Follow-up was at 2-6 weeks, 15 and between 42 and 54 months. RESULTS: There were no major complications. There was one infection and one case of retention of urine. There were no testicular complications. There were five recurrences, all within 6 months of operation, four of which were among the first 20 cases. Modifications to the original technique were made, and one recurrence occurred in the remaining 81 patients (1 per cent) or 106 hernias (1 per cent). CONCLUSION: Preperitoneal mesh repair gives results far superior to those of the commonly used anterior approach. It is safer and easier to learn than laparoscopic repair and is the procedure of choice for complex multirecurrent inguinal hernia.

Adult↗

Effect of subspecialty training and volume on outcome after pediatric inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common operation performed in children. The aim of this study was to determine if there are any differences in outcome when this procedure is performed by subspecialist pediatric surgeons when compared with general surgeons. METHODS: All pediatric inguinal hernias repaired in the province of Ontario between 1993 and 2000 were reviewed using a population-based database. Children with complex medical conditions or prematurity were excluded. Cases done by general surgeons were compared with those done by pediatric surgeons. The chi2 test was used for nominal data and the Student's t test was used for continuous variables. Probabilities were calculated based on a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 20,545 eligible hernia repairs, 50.3% were performed by pediatric surgeons and 49.7% were performed by general surgeons. Pediatric surgeons operated on 62.4% of children younger than 2 years, 51.8% of children aged 26 years, and 37% of children older than 7 years. Duration of operation, length of hospital stay, and incidence of early postoperative complications were similar among pediatric and general surgeons. The rate of recurrent inguinal hernia was higher in the general surgeon group compared with pediatric surgeons (1.10% vs 0.45%, P < .001). Among pediatric surgeons, the estimated risk of hernia recurrence was independent of surgical volume. There was a significant inverse correlation between surgeon volume and recurrence risk among general surgeons, with the highest volume general surgeons achieving recurrence rates similar to pediatric surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric surgeons have a lower rate of recurrence after inguinal hernia repair in children. General surgeons with high volumes have similar outcomes to pediatric surgeons.

Adolescent↗

[The Prolene Hernia System for inguinal hernia repair].

Prosthetic repair is now considered as a standard in hernia surgery. The authors describe herein the technique of placement of Prolene Hernia System (PHS) which has the feature of a "3 in 1 system" according to the principles of Rives and Stoppa on one hand and those of Lichtenstein on the other hand. The steps of surgical technique are described.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗

Cancer in inguinal hernias.

Cancer in inguinal hernias is rare. The author reports the first case of thymoma metastatic to an inguinal hernia sac (saccular) and the 13th case of colon cancer in an inguinal hernia (intrasaccular); both cases presented clinically as incarcerated hernias.

Adult↗

A study of metastatic cancer found during inguinal hernia repair.

Among 22,816 inguinal hernia repairs done between 1950 and 1988, 15 patients (0.07%) had metastatic tumors found within their hernias. Inguinal herniation was the initial sign of cancer in six patients. A palpable inguinal mass (53%) and abdominal or groin pain (67%) were the most common presenting sign and symptom, respectively. Primary tumor sites included the gastrointestinal tract (40%), ovary (20%), prostate (13%), mesothelium (13%), and unknown sites (13%). The median patient survival was 20 months and depended on the primary tumor site. Grossly apparent inguinal hernia sac abnormalities should be examined microscopically to avoid missing the diagnosis of metastatic cancer, but routine histologic examination of all hernia sacs is not warranted.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗