SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Low Back Pain”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

Low back pain.

Low back pain (LBP) affects a large proportion of the population and is an increasingly costly problem in the western world. This review highlights some of the recent theories relating to LBP and the conflicting evidence which has been brought to light. Theories relating to the causes of LBP have included single and multiple factors such as abnormal physical findings, mechanical, psychosocial and economic factors. The two lowest lumbar segments are most often afflicted in LBP sufferers, but the diagnosis of LBP is otherwise uncertain in most cases due to insufficient knowledge relating to the validity of clinical tests, inconsistent terminology and unclear symptomatic patterns. Despite a lack of understanding of the exact anatomical cause of LBP, an abundance of therapeutic models exist, most of which are purely empirical, and few methods have been shown to be clinically useful. Similarly, insufficient knowledge of the causes of LBP makes primary, secondary and tertiary prevention difficult.

Back Pain↗

PubMed1988

Acute low back pain: diagnosis and management of mechanical back pain.

Low back pain is the most common musculoskeletal complaint seen in an ambulatory care setting and affects 80 per cent of all persons at some time in their lives. It is the number one cause of activity restriction in people under 45. With the exception of progressive neuromotor compromise, the initial treatment of nearly all causes of LBP is conservative: the use of analgesics and/or anti-inflammatory agents, bed rest, and patient education.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Massage for low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is one of the most common and costly musculoskeletal problems in modern societies. Proponents of massage therapy claim it can minimize pain and disability, and speed return to normal function. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of massage therapy for non-specific low back pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Healthstar, CINAHL and Dissertation abstracts from 1966 to 1999 with no language restrictions. References in the included studies and in reviews of the literature were also screened. Contact with content experts and massage associations were also made. SELECTION CRITERIA: This review included randomized, quasi-randomized or controlled clinical trials that investigated the use of any type of massage (using the hands or a mechanical device) as a treatment for nonspecific low back pain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer applied the selection criteria and extracted the data. Two reviewers (one blinded to authors, institutions and journals) independently assessed the quality of each trial. A qualitative analysis (best-evidence synthesis) was performed due to clinical heterogeneity among the included trials and insufficient data reported. MAIN RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Two trials were of high and two of low methodological quality. None evaluated massage as the main intervention. Rather, it was the control intervention in studies evaluating manipulation, electrical stimulation, and a lumbar corset. There is limited evidence showing that massage is less effective than manipulation immediately after the first session and moderate evidence showing it is less effective than TENS during the course of sessions in relieving pain and improving activity. At the completion of treatment and at 3 weeks after discharge there is no difference among massage and manipulation, electrical stimulation or corsets, but this evidence is limited. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Based on the studies reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to recommend massage as a stand-alone treatment for non-specific low back pain. There is a need for high quality controlled trials to further evaluate the effects of massage for this condition.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

[Epidemiology and costs of chronic pain syndromes exemplified by specific and unspecific low back pain].

Low back pain is one of the most common factors leading to longtime disability. Unspecific low back pain is predominant, i. e. low back pain without an anatomic or neurophysiological correlate. The socioeconomic impact of back pain is huge. In Germany 4% of all work force is lost only due to low back pain. Psychosocial factors are essential for the chronification and must be take into account in therapy. Conventional therapy has shown low efficacy, especially once chronification has started.

Back Pain↗

PubMed1991

Predicting disability time using formal low back pain measurement: the Low Back Pain Simulation Scale.

Objective evaluation of simulation in low back pain is currently not possible. A new simulation scale based on subject response to 103 pain words has shown promise in discriminating patients with low back pain from those simulating low back pain. Administration of this scale to 1679 individuals who were injured at work produced a 10.4% sample with scores in the simulation range. This subsample projected more intense pain and were disabled longer. These findings were replicated in a second study in which treating physicians rated the degree of physical pathology and symptom exaggeration blind to patient classification by the Low Back Pain Simulation Scale. Medical assessment indicated less organic pathology and greater symptom exaggeration among patients classified as simulators providing a measure of support for the validity of the simulation scale.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Combination of low back pain and previous low back pain and shoulder stiffness in construction employees.

A postal questionnaire for the prevalence of low back pain was studied with relevance to stiffness of that shoulder and a history of low back disorders in construction employees. The percentage of clerical employees with low back pain was 31.3% and of field workers was 30.3%. Odds ratios representing a relative risk factor for low back pain relating to each age group showed 2.35 in the clerical and 2.10 in the field workers at the age of 30-34 years, and 3.34 and 2.58 at the age of 35-39 years, respectively. In the persons with positive previous low back pain, the prevalence rate of low back pain was 52.6% in the clerical, and 50.2% in the field workers. Odds ratios for low back pain relating to previous low back pain significantly exceeded unity for the clerical employees (OR = 9.53) and the field workers (OR = 10.28), compared to those without a history of previous low back pain. The incidence of stiffness of the shoulder was 48.2% in the clerical and 45.2% in the field workers, and the prevalence rate of low back pain among those with stiffness of the shoulder was 68.5% in the clerical and 65.8% in the field workers. Odds ratio were 3.03 in both groups. Among each age group, the prevalence rate of stiffness of the shoulder with low back pain increased gradually to a maximum in the 45-49 age group of 19%, and then dropped. In those with a history of low back pain and/or stiffness of the shoulder, the prevalence of low back pain showed significantly greater value than other risk factors.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Impaired trunk muscle function in sub-acute neck pain: etiologic in the subsequent development of low back pain?

Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain are associated with dysfunction of the trunk and neck muscles, respectively, and may involve common or similar mechanisms. In both cases, dysfunction may compromise spinal control. Anecdotally, neck pain patients commonly develop LBP. This study investigated the possibility that trunk muscle function is compromised in neck pain patients and that compromised trunk muscle function is associated with increased risk of LBP. Fifty-four neck pain patients and 52 controls were assessed on an abdominal drawing-in task (ADIT) and on self-report tests. Performance on the ADIT was able to detect neck pain patients with 85% sensitivity and 73% specificity. Catastrophizing and McGill pain questionnaire (affective) scores were higher in patients with an abnormal task response than in patients with an uncertain or normal response, although the self-report data did not predict task performance. Fifty subjects from each group were contactable by telephone at 2 years. They were asked whether they had experienced persistent or recurrent LBP since the assessment. Subjects (patients and controls) who obtained an abnormal response on the ADIT were 3 to 6 times more likely to develop persistent or recurrent LBP than those who obtained an uncertain or normal response. ADIT performance was the main predictor of development of LBP in patients. The results suggest that reduced voluntary trunk muscle control in neck pain patients is associated with an increased risk of developing LBP.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1994

Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain.

Low Back Pain Rating scale is an index scale which includes measurements of pain intensity, disability, and physical impairment. The scale was designed to monitor the outcome of clinical trials of low back pain treatment. It has been validated in 58 patients following first-time discectomy. The scale rating can be rapidly carried out and requires no special aids. With slight modification it can be used in office and telephone interviews, as well as postal questionnaires. These modifications only slightly reduce the quantity of information gathered. In the study, a high rater agreement (97.7%) was found without level difference between two observers using the scale. The validation process included: construct validity, criterion-related validity and item bias, relative to Global Assessments pronounced by the patient and an experienced clinician. Low Back Pain Rating scale hs been shown to be valid and reliable in the assessment of low back pain.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Relevant studies of low back pain (LBP) published between 1990 and 2002 were systematically retrieved via electronic databases and checking of reference lists. Forty papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 10 were of high quality. A wide variety of instruments had been used for collection of data on work related psychosocial factors, many of which had not undergone any form of validation. Moderate evidence was found for no association between LBP and perception of work, organisational aspects of work, and social support at work. There was insufficient evidence for a positive association between stress at work and LBP. No conclusions could be drawn regarding perception of work and consequences of LBP. There was strong evidence for no association between organisational aspects of work and moderate evidence for no association between social support at work and stress at work and consequences of LBP.

Cohort Studies↗

PubMed2006

Decreased limits of stability in response to postural perturbations in subjects with low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is associated with abnormal movement strategies due to changes in neuromuscular control. A plausible contributing factor to low back pain is poor control of trunk muscles, thus understanding motor control alterations in this population can guide rehabilitation. Quantification of postural responses following support surface translations is one way to examine motor control impairments in people with low back pain. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects [mean 33 (SD 11) years] who had no low back pain and 26 subjects [mean 39 (SD 13) years] with chronic, recurrent low back pain were instructed to stand with feet placed on separate force plates, which were mounted on a moveable platform. The platform was translated unexpectedly in one of 12 directions for a total of 72 trials. For both the sagittal and frontal planes, the net center of pressure displacement was derived and the total body center of mass was calculated by combining kinematic and anthropometric data. FINDINGS: For sagittal plane responses, subjects with low back pain had reduced and delayed sagittal plane center of pressure responses (P<0.01) compared to the subjects without low back pain. In contrast, the sagittal plane center of mass responses were larger in magnitude (P=0.03) yet similarly delayed in onset (P=0.04) for the low back pain group. Frontal plane responses did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Subjects with low back pain have altered automatic postural coordination, both in terms of magnitude and timing of responses, indicating alterations in neuromuscular control.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

The effectiveness of four interventions for the prevention of low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: Low back pain affects 60% to 80% of US adults at some time during their lives. This review evaluates the effectiveness of four strategies to prevent low back pain for asymptomatic individuals: back and aerobic exercises, education, mechanical supports (corsets), and risk factor modification. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE database was searched for all relevant articles published in English between 1966 and 1993. Bibliographies of identified articles were searched to ensure that all pertinent articles had been gathered and back pain specialists reviewed our final bibliography for completeness. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: A total of 190 articles were identified, and the 64 that contained original data about preventing low back pain were reviewed. Studies were graded according to strength of study design. DATA SYNTHESIS: There is limited evidence based on randomized trials and epidemiological studies that exercises to strengthen back or abdominal muscles and to improve overall fitness can decrease the incidence and duration of low back pain episodes. There is minimal evidence to support the use of educational strategies to prevent low back pain and insufficient evidence to recommend about the use of mechanical supports. Although there is no evidence supporting risk factor modification for preventing low back pain (smoking cessation and weight loss), there are other reasons to recommend the interventions. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence to recommend exercise to prevent low back pain in asymptomatic individuals, but there is insufficient evidence to recommend other prevention strategies. These conclusions should be viewed cautiously since they are primarily based on studies conducted in the workplace rather than in clinical settings.

Behavior Therapy↗

PubMed2005

Meta-analysis: acupuncture for low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain limits activity and is the second most frequent reason for physician visits. Previous research shows widespread use of acupuncture for low back pain. PURPOSE: To assess acupuncture's effectiveness for treating low back pain. DATA SOURCES: Randomized, controlled trials were identified through searches of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, CISCOM, and GERA databases through August 2004. Additional data sources included previous reviews and personal contacts with colleagues. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials comparing needle acupuncture with sham acupuncture, other sham treatments, no additional treatment, or another active treatment for patients with low back pain. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were dually extracted for the outcomes of pain, functional status, overall improvement, return to work, and analgesic consumption. In addition, study quality was assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 33 randomized, controlled trials that met inclusion criteria were subgrouped according to acute or chronic pain, style of acupuncture, and type of control group used. The principal [correction] measure of effect size was the standardized mean difference, since the trials assessed the same outcome but measured it in various ways. For the primary outcome of short-term relief of chronic pain, the meta-analyses showed that acupuncture is significantly more effective than sham treatment (standardized mean difference, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.73]; 7 trials) and no additional treatment (standardized mean difference, 0.69 [CI, 0.40 to 0.98]; 8 trials). For patients with acute low back pain, data are sparse and inconclusive. Data are also insufficient for drawing conclusions about acupuncture's short-term effectiveness compared with most other therapies. LIMITATIONS: The quantity and quality of the included trials varied. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture effectively relieves chronic low back pain. No evidence suggests that acupuncture is more effective than other active therapies.

Acupuncture Therapy↗

PubMed2003

Straightforward consultation or complicated condition? General practitioners' perceptions of low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a common condition in general practice and represents a significant part of a general practitioner's workload. However, despite guidelines, back pain still presents considerable challenges to clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions and declared behaviour of UK general practitioners in relation to patients with low back pain. METHOD: A qualitative design was used, involving semi-structured interviews with 17 GPs in the North of England. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged from the data relating to approaches to and perceptions of low back pain. A dichotomy emerged, where GPs describe their approach to what they know to be a straightforward consultation where most patients recover, and the frustration they experience when patients do not. Although GPs are using a simple bio-mechanistic approach to low back pain, they also operate a method of categorising patients, which involves identifying real and pseudo patients. When confronted with 'challenging' cases, that is those who do not recover, most GPs feel isolated and poorly prepared. CONCLUSION: GPs adopt a bio-mechanistic approach to LBP which appears to work well for the majority of patients, as the natural history of low back pain dictates that most patients will recover. However, this approach to low back pain fails at the margins and this is evident by the significant minority of persistent sufferers and the GP's reaction to them. Expanding patient-centredness to explore psychological and social dimensions in relation to low back pain presents an ongoing challenge in general practice.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Do minimally invasive procedures have a place in the treatment of chronic low back pain?

Chronic low back pain is the leading cause of disability in the industrialized world. Medical and surgical treatments remain costly despite limited efficacy. The field of 'interventional pain' has grown enormously and evidence-based practice guidelines are systematically developed. In this article, the vast, complex and contradictory literature regarding the treatment of chronic low back pain is reviewed. Interventional pain literature suggests that there is moderate evidence (small randomized, nonrandomized, single group or matched-case controlled studies) for medial branch neurotomy and limited evidence (nonexperimental one or more center studies) for intradiscal treatments in mechanical low back pain. There is moderate evidence for the use of transforaminal epidural steroid injections, lumbar percutaneous adhesiolysis and spinal endoscopy for painful lumbar radiculopathy, and spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal pumps mostly after spinal surgery. In reality, there is no gold standard for the treatment of chronic low back pain, but these results appear promising.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2005

Management of chronic low back pain.

Chronic low back pain is common. It presents a clinical challenge with widespread implications for resource utilization on a national scale. The causes of chronic low back pain may be mechanical or nonmechanical, nociceptive or neuropathic. Diagnosis is problematic because available tools lack both specificity and sensitivity. In rare instances, the cause of chronic low back pain can be attributed to an identified cause. Comprehensive pain management relies on the use of pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Recent studies have shown a benefit for traditional adjunctive therapies and interdisciplinary treatment. Antidepressants and opioids have been and remain key elements for medical management, and some recently developed therapies have shown promising results in clinical trials. The following article presents an overview of evidence-based management for chronic low back pain, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical therapies.

Catheter Ablation↗

PubMed1997

Primary care management of acute low back pain.

Acute low back pain will affect more than 80% of the population, with more than 28% of the industrial workforce suffering from lost work. Acute low back pain is recognized as the third most common illness presenting to private practice groups. The psychosocial overtones of depression and anxiety that often coexist or predate the episode of acute low back pain add to its complexity and cost. Diagnosis and treatment options are reviewed based on the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research recommendations of 1994. This article reviews details of the history and physical with emphasis on the importance of a thorough neurologic and psychologic evaluation. "Red flags" that should warn the clinician of the presence of a more acute illness are discussed with recommendations for referral. The treatment of acute low back pain now centers on increasing mobility and functional use of the spine as soon as possible. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents as well as aspirin and acetaminophen are recommended as first-line drug treatments; they have been found to be equally as effective as muscle relaxants and opioids for the control of pain without the burden of dependence and potential for abuse.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2006

Technology Insight: imaging of low back pain.

Chronic low back pain is a common condition that has significant economic consequences for affected patients and their communities. Despite the prevailing view that an anatomic diagnosis is often impossible, an origin for the pain can frequently be found if current diagnostic techniques are fully used. Such techniques include a mixture of noninvasive and invasive imaging. Prevalence data suggest that the intervertebral disc is one of the most common sources of back pain, accounting for around 40% of cases. The pathologic basis for discogenic low back pain might be full-thickness radial tears of the annulus fibrosus. Unfortunately, only MRI can image the internal morphology of the disc, and both CT and MRI lack the necessary specificity to validate this hypothesis. Many so-called radiographic abnormalities seen on CT and MRI are commonly encountered in asymptomatic individuals. Invasive techniques such as joint injections, nerve blocks and provocative discography can show the connection between an abnormal image and the source of low back pain, but do have notable related risks. The development of a noninvasive, low-risk technique that can show this connection is desirable.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

The role of bed rest in acute low back pain.

Acute low back pain is a common problem and clinicians from a number of different disciplines are involved in its management. Advice on daily activities constitutes an important part in the management of low back pain. In spite of evidence against its efficacy, bed rest continues to be a cornerstone of treatment. The purpose of this review is to present evidence from literature to determine the effectiveness of bed rest for patients with acute low back pain together with comparison of bed rest versus advice to stay active, bed rest versus other treatment modalities and shorter periods of bed rest (2 to 4 days) versus longer periods (more than 4 days) of bed rest. There is strong evidence to suggest that bed rest is not effective in the management of acute low back pain.

Acute Disease↗