PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Luciferases, Firefly”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Quenching of tryptophan fluorescence of firefly luciferase by substrates.

The interaction of firefly luciferase with substrates (luciferin and MgATP) by steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence is studied. The efficient quenching of tryptophan fluorescence of the active enzyme takes place upon its binding with substrates. In the presence of ATP the quenching is of dynamic type and is caused by structural changes in the protein molecule upon ATP binding. A model is proposed in which the complex has smaller fluorescence quantum yield than the free enzyme because of partial quenching of tryptophan fluorescence by the new microenvironment. Quenching of tryptophan fluorescence by luciferin due to the efficient energy transfer from tryptophan to luciferin is discussed. The calculated distance between Trp-419 and luciferin for the L. mingrelica luciferase in the enzyme-substrate complex is less than 12 A.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Identification of a firefly luciferase active site peptide using a benzophenone-based photooxidation reagent.

Firefly luciferase catalyzes the highly efficient emission of yellow-green light from substrate luciferin by a series of reactions that require MgATP and molecular oxygen. We prepared 2-(4-benzoylphenyl)thiazole-4-carboxylic acid (BPTC), a novel benzophenone-based substrate analog, intending to use it in photoaffinity labeling studies to probe the luciferase active site. Instead, we found that while BPTC was a potent photoinactivating reagent for firefly luciferase, it was not a photoaffinity labeling agent. Using proteolysis, reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography, tandem high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and Edman sequencing, we identified a single luciferase peptide, 244HHGF247, the degradation of which was directly correlated to luciferase photoinactivation. Results of enzyme kinetics and related studies were consistent with this peptide being at or near the luciferin binding site. Further, peptide model studies and additional investigations on the nature of the photoinactivation process strongly suggested that BPTC catalyzed the formation of singlet oxygen at the active site of the enzyme. We describe here an uncommon example of active site-directed photooxidation of an enzyme by singlet oxygen.

Affinity Labels↗

Does pressure antagonize anesthesia? Opposite effects on specific and nonspecific inhibitors of firefly luciferase.

Ueda and Suzuki (1998. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1380:313-319; 1998. Biophys. J. 75:1052-1057) reported that myristic acid inhibited firefly luciferase in microM range in competition with luciferin, whereas anesthetics inhibited it in millimeter ranges noncompetitively with luciferin. Myristate increased, whereas anesthetics decreased, the thermal denaturation temperature. The present study showed that high pressure increased the steady-state light intensity of the halothane-doped firefly luciferase but decreased that of the myristate-doped firefly luciferase. The steady-state light intensity showed a maximum at 19.1 degrees C. At 19.1 degrees C, high pressure did not affect the light intensity in the absence of the inhibitors. In the presence of 0.5 mM halothane, however, 25 MPa pressure (maximum effect) increased the light intensity to 106.0% of the control without the inhibitor. In the presence of 2.5 microM myristate, 40 MPa pressure decreased the light intensity to 90.9% of the control. When the temperature was 25 degrees C in the absence of inhibitors, 40 MPa pressure increased the light intensity 119.2% of the ambient value. At 0.5 mM halothane, 40 MPa pressure further increased the light intensity to 106.1% above the control 40 MPa value. At 2.5 microM myristate, 40 MPa pressure decreased the light intensity to 90.1% of the control 40 MPa value. From the pressure dependence of the light intensity, the volume change DeltaV of the enzyme was estimated at 25 degrees C: 0.5 mM halothane increased DeltaV = +3.93 cm3 mol-1, whereas 2.5 microM myristate decreased DeltaV = -7.66 cm3 mol-1. Present results show that there are distinct differences between the specific and nonspecific ligands in their response to high pressure. Myristate, which competes with luciferin, decreased the protein volume and stabilized the conformation against thermal perturbation. Halothane, which does not compete with the substrate, increased the protein volume and destabilized the conformation.

Anesthesia↗

High-throughput assay for the identification of Hsp90 inhibitors based on Hsp90-dependent refolding of firefly luciferase.

Previously, we have demonstrated that the renaturation of heat denatured firefly luciferase is dependent upon the activity of Hsp90 in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Here, we demonstrate that this assay may identify inhibitors that obstruct the chaperone activity of Hsp90 either by direct binding to its N-terminal or C-terminal nucleotide binding sites or by interference with the ability of the chaperone to switch conformations. The assay was adapted and optimized for high-throughput screening. Greater than 20,000 compounds were screened to demonstrate the feasibility of using this assay on a large scale. The assay was reproducible (av Z-factor=0.62) and identified 120 compounds that inhibited luciferase renaturation by greater than 70% at a concentration of 12.5 microg/mL. IC50 values for twenty compounds with varying structures were determined for inhibition of luciferase refolding and in cell-based assays for Hsp90 inhibition. Several compounds had IC50 values <10 microM and represent a number of new lead structures with the potential for further development and optimization as potent Hsp90 inhibitors.

Cell Division↗

The carboxyl-terminal tripeptide serine-lysine-leucine of firefly luciferase is necessary but not sufficient for peroxisomal import in yeast.

Firefly luciferase is imported into peroxisomes in insects, mammals, plants, and yeast, which implies that the mechanism of protein translocation into peroxisomes has been conserved during eukaryotic evolution. The carboxyl-terminal tripeptide serine-lysine-leucine in luciferase acts as a peroxisomal import signal in mammalian cells. We have investigated whether this tripeptide is also involved in translocation of firefly luciferase into peroxisomes in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We show by gene fusion experiments that the carboxyl-terminal 104 amino acids of luciferase can direct a heterologous protein to yeast peroxisomes. Luciferase mutant proteins were tested for their ability to be imported into yeast peroxisomes in vivo. We demonstrate that mutations in the carboxyl-terminal serine-lysine-leucine tripeptide abolish translocation of the protein into yeast peroxisomes. However, when a passenger protein was tagged at its carboxyl terminus with this tripeptide the fusion protein did not go to peroxisomes. These results indicate that, in yeast, the tripeptide is necessary but not sufficient for peroxisomal import.

Animals↗

Evaluation of firefly luciferase bioluminescence mediated photodynamic toxicity in cancer cells.

PURPOSE: This work investigated whether fLuc-catalyzed oxidation of D-luciferin generates sufficient light to induce photodynamic toxicity in cancer cells. PROCEDURES: Light emission was assessed via cooled CCD (charge-coupled device) camera. Parental and fLuc expressing cancer cells were exposed to subtoxic concentrations of photosensitizers (Rose Bengal or hypericin) and D-luciferin, sunlight, or lamplight. Toxicity was assessed by MTT assay. RESULTS: fLuc expressing cells emitted up to 500-fold higher levels of photons than parental cell lines. Although exposure to photosensitizer and sunlight reduced survival of various cell lines, survival of fLuc expressing cells incubated with photosensitizer and D-luciferin, or photosensitizer and lamplight, did not differ significantly from parental or untreated cells. CONCLUSIONS: Contesting recent reports, fLuc bioluminescence does not generate sufficient photons to induce Rose Bengal or hypericin photodynamic toxicity in a range of malignant and nonmalignant cell lines, and is not suitable as a generalizable approach to antineoplastic therapy.

Animals↗

Visualizing fungal infections in living mice using bioluminescent pathogenic Candida albicans strains transformed with the firefly luciferase gene.

Animal studies with Candida albicans have provided models for understanding fungal virulence and antifungal drug development. To non-invasively monitor long-term Candida murine infections, clinical isolates were stably transformed with a codon-optimized luciferase gene to constitutively express luciferase. Chronic systemic infections were established in mice with engineered strains, and bioluminescent signals were apparent from kidneys by non-invasive imaging using charged-coupled device cameras. These infections were established in immune-competent mice, and bioluminescence was detectable in animals that showed no physiological consequence of infection, as well as those visually succumbing to the disease. Similarly, bioluminescence was measured from the vaginal tissue of mice infected vaginally. Fungal loads determined by plating vaginal lavages showed a similar pattern to the bioluminescent signals measured, and fungal infection could be detected in animals for over 30 days post infection by both modalities. The effect of the antifungal drug miconazole was tested in this model, and clearance in animals was apparent by both direct imaging and fungal load determination. The use of bioluminescence to monitor these and other models of Candida infections will greatly speed up the analysis of drug development studies, both in ease of visualizing infections and decreasing numbers of animals required to run such studies.

Animals↗

Monoclonal antibodies assisting refolding of firefly luciferase.

The reactivation efficiency in the refolding of denatured luciferase in the presence and the absence of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has been studied. Luciferase could be partially reactivated when the protein was denatured in high concentrations of guanidium chloride (GdmCl; >4.5 M) and the refolding was carried out in very low protein concentrations. The refolding yield was, however, significantly lower when it was performed on luciferase that had been denatured with lower concentrations of GdmCl. The efficiency of refolding decreases when the formation of aggregates increases. Three of the five luciferase mAbs tested (4G3, N2E3, S2G10) dramatically increased the yield of reactivation and simultaneously eliminated the formation of aggregates. It is proposed that these mAbs assisted the refolding of luciferase by binding to the exposed hydrophobic surface of the refolding intermediate, thus preventing it from aggregating. The epitopes interacting with these refolding-assisting mAbs are all located in the A-subdomain of the N-terminal region of luciferase. These results have also shed light on the structural features of the intermediate and its interface involved in protein aggregate formation, contributing to the understanding of the protein folding mechanism.

Animals↗

Firefly luciferase exhibits bimodal action depending on the luciferin chirality.

Firefly luciferase is able to convert L-luciferin into luciferyl-CoA even under ordinary aerobic luciferin-luciferase reaction conditions. The luciferase is able to recognize strictly the chirality of the luciferin structure, serving as the acyl-CoA synthetase for L-luciferin, whereas d-luciferin is used for the bioluminescence reaction. D-Luciferin inhibits the luciferyl-CoA synthetase activity of L-luciferin, whereas L-luciferin retards the bioluminescence reaction of D-luciferin, meaning that both enzyme activities are prevented by the enantiomer of its own substrate.

Acyl Coenzyme A↗

Firefly luciferase is a bifunctional enzyme: ATP-dependent monooxygenase and a long chain fatty acyl-CoA synthetase.

Firefly luciferase can catalyze the formation of fatty acyl-CoA via fatty acyl-adenylate from fatty acid in the presence of ATP, Mg(2+) and coenzyme A (CoA). A long chain fatty acyl-CoA (C(16)-C(20)), produced by luciferase from a North American firefly (Photinus pyralis) and a Japanese firefly (Luciola cruciata), was isolated and identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. Of a number of substrates tested, linolenic acid (C(18:3)) and arachidonic acid (C(20:4)) appear to be suitable for acyl-CoA synthesis. This evidence suggests that firefly luciferase within peroxisomes of the cells in the photogenic organ may be a bifunctional enzyme, catalyzing not only the bioluminescence reaction but also the fatty acyl-CoA synthetic reaction.

Acyltransferases↗

Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA for firefly luciferase from Photuris pennsylvanica.

The first cDNA from the Photurinae subfamily of the Lampyridae encoding a firefly luciferase from lantern mRNA of Photuris pennsylvanica has been cloned, sequenced, the amino-acid sequence predicted and the sequence reported to GenBank. The cDNA was about 1.8 kb in length with the largest open reading frame coding for a 545-residue protein. The 5' noncoding region is 61 bp long and the 3' noncoding region is 135 bp in length. There is a 24-nucleotide poly(A) tail. When the amino-acid residues are aligned, P. pennsylvanica contains 154 (about 28% of the total residues) that are conserved in all 16 of the deduced luciferase sequences that are presently available. In this P. pennsylvanica luciferase, the amino acids at 276 of the positions are the same at corresponding positions of at least one of the other enzymes. There are two amino-acid differences between this luciferase and the unpublished sequence obtained by Dr. Keith Wood for a putative larval Photuris firefly luciferase cloned from a Maryland firefly. Signature amino-acid sequences and domains found in the deduced sequence are for adenylate kinase, the putative AMP-binding domain, luciferin 4-monooxygenase, 4-coumarate CoA ligase, long-chain fatty acid CoA ligase, 2-acylglycerophosphoethanolamine acyltransferase, the microbody-directing sequence, peptide-synthesizing complexes, and acyladenylate-synthesizing enzymes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The sulfhydryls of firefly luciferase are not essential for activity.

Firefly luciferase, containing an average of seven free sulfhydryls per two 50 000-dalton polypeptides, was modified by various sulfhydryl reagents. The differential reactivities of the sulfhydryls in luciferase protected by substrates allow one to define three categories of these groups: Class SH-III contains three sulfhydryls that are not involved in enzymatic activity. Class SH-II contains two sulfhydryls whose modification by different reagents causes varying effects on activity ranging from 0 to 60% inactivation. These sulfhydryls are not essential but may be important structurally or sterically. Class SH-I contains two sulfhydryls that are protected by substrates, either dehydroluciferyl adenylate or dehydroluciferin alone, and are located at or near the active site. The SH-I sulfhydryls are vicinal in the enzyme as demonstrated by their ability to form a disulfide bond. They have also been shown to exist on a single polypeptide chain. Modification of the SH-I groups by most reagents results in complete loss of enzymatic activity; reaction with methyl methanethiosulfonate produces an enzyme that emits only red light whereas native luciferase emits yellow-green light. Evidence is presented that the modified enzyme, while catalytically active, has a distorted active site. It is concluded that these two SH-I sulfhydryls are not essential for activity.

Coleoptera↗

Stability of firefly luciferase in tricine buffer and in a commercial enzyme stabilizer.

A solution of firefly luciferase in AuthentiZyme Enzyme Stabilizer retains full activity when stored in an ice bath (0.5 degrees C) during one day. These solutions have the advantage that no additional protein (other than the luciferase) is present, which is desirable for proteolytic digestion and protein derivatization experiments. For longer-term experiments, firefly luciferase solutions in 0.05 mol/l Tricine buffer at pH 7.8, 10 mmol/l MgSO4, 1 mmol/l EDTA, and 1 mmol/l DTT which contain 100 micrograms/ml of bovine serum albumin are stable for 6 weeks if frozen and thawed only once.

Animals↗

Enhancement of thermostability of firefly luciferase from Luciola lateralis by a single amino acid substitution.

We constructed firefly luciferase mutants from Luciola lateralis in which Ala at position 217 was replaced by each of three hydrophobic amino acid residues (Ile, Leu, and Val). These mutants were superior to the wild-type in thermostability. Especially, the purified Ala217Leu mutant still maintained over 70% of the initial activity after 60 min at 50 degrees C. This mutant is the most thermostable firefly luciferase obtained.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Effective cotranslational folding of firefly luciferase without chaperones of the Hsp70 family.

Molecular chaperones of the Hsp70 family (bacterial DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE) were shown to be strictly required for refolding of firefly luciferase from a denatured state and thus for effective restoration of its activity. At the same time the luciferase was found to be synthesized in an Escherichia coli cell-free translation system in a highly active state in the extract with no chaperone activity. The addition of the chaperones to the extract during translation did not raise the activity of the enzyme. The abrupt arrest of translation by the addition of a translational inhibitor led to immediate cessation of the enzyme activity accumulation, indicating the cotranslational character of luciferase folding. The results presented suggest that the chaperones of the Hsp70 family are not required for effective cotranslational folding of firefly luciferase.

Cell-Free System↗