PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MANDIBULOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Hereditary macrostomus in the rabbit: a model for Treacher Collins syndrome, one form of mandibulofacial dysostosis.

Macrostomus in the rabbit was diagnosed externally by the presence of papillae at the corners of the mouth. Internally the effect is on the zygomatic complex and is extremely variable. Inheritance appears to be due to a single autosomal recessive gene with incomplete penetrance. We propose the symbol mst for the gene responsible for this condition. Evidence is presented to suggest that this gene is very likely in linkage group IV. Macrostomus in the rabbit is a model for the Treacher Collins syndrome, one form of mandibulofacial dysostosis in humans.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Contrasting mandibular growth and facial development in long face syndrome, juvenile rheumatoid polyarthritis, and mandibulofacial dysostosis.

The complex rotation process of the mandible during growth is elucidated by longitudinal roentgencephalometric analyses, using metallic implants as fixed references. Contrasting development of face and mandibular shape is described in three subjects. In the so-called long face syndrome, development is characterized by increasing inclination of the mandible during growth with only moderate remodeling. In the subjects with juvenile rheumatoid polyarthritis and mandibulofacial dysostosis, the increase in mandibular inclination is moderate. However, the mandibular corpus rotates backward to an extreme extent within the more stable soft tissue matrix, giving rise to the characteristic development of angular notching with an extended angular process at the lower border.

Arthritis, Juvenile↗
PubMed1989

Dysmorphogenesis of the mandible, zygoma, and middle ear ossicles in hemifacial microsomia and mandibulofacial dysostosis.

A review of the anatomical changes in patients with various "first arch" syndromes shows that some anomalies (e.g., micrognathia, ear defects) generally appear together. This study tested the hypothesis that the mandible, zygomatic arch, and middle ear ossicles are a developmental field (i.e., when any of these structures is anomalous, the other two will be also). The hypothesis was tested using data from 25 patients with mandibulofacial dysostosis (MFD) and 40 patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM). Analysis of the pooled data showed that the hypothesis of character association was generally supported. However, the medians suggested that different factors probably played a role in determining how these three anatomical structures were associated in MFD and HFM. Errors in chondrogenesis may have been primarily responsible for the HFM phenotype. Alterations in Meckel and palatoquadrate cartilages would account for the size and shape changes observed in the ossicles and mandible, while changes in cranial base cartilages may explain the changes noted in the zygomatic arch. Since all three structures were equally affected in MFD, it is problematic to use an interference with chondrogenesis as an explanation for the phenotype. We conclude that although the mandible, zygomatic arch, and middle ear ossicles appear to form a "developmental field," the association between structures varies for HFM and MFD. The relatively lesser involvement of the zygomatic arch in HFM than in MFD suggests different pathogeneses for the two diagnostic groups and maybe a useful criterion for judging animal models of HFM.

Ear Ossicles↗