SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
It is proposed that motion perception is mediated within two parallel channels in the visual system. These channels are distinguished by the following properties: rate of recovery from adaptation; degree of fine tuning for contour orientation; inclusion of color sensitive units; and ocular dominance characteristics. Three experiments are reported which test the hypothesized systems.
During rapid eye movements, motion of the stationary world is generally not perceived despite displacement of the whole image on the retina. Here we report that during saccades, human observers sensed visual motion of patterns with low spatial frequency. The effect was greatest when the stimulus was spatiotemporally optimal for motion detection by the magnocellular pathway. Adaptation experiments demonstrated dependence of this intrasaccadic motion percept on activation of direction-selective mechanisms. Even two-dimensional complex motion percepts requiring spatial integration of early motion signals were observed during saccades. These results indicate that the magnocellular pathway functions during saccades, and that only spatiotemporal limitations of visual motion perception are important in suppressing awareness of intrasaccadic motion signals.
While activity of MT+/V5 neurons is believed to be necessary for the conscious perception of visual motion, whether neural activity in MT+/V5 is a sufficient condition for the conscious perception of motion in vision still remains unanswered. A high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was designed and performed to answer this specific question. Eleven healthy subjects viewed a checkerboard pattern stimulus reversed in contrast at 0.2, 12, 30, and 60 Hz while being probed for activation in MT+/V5. At 0.2 Hz, all viewers perceived pattern-reversal which was stationary in position. However, at 12, 30, and 60 Hz, many subjects perceived apparent motion (e.g., vertical and horizontal flows) in the square pattern. At 12 and 30 Hz reversals, MT+/V5 was activated in all subjects (11/11). Nevertheless, three out of eleven (3/11) subjects denied motion perception in these conditions. At 60 Hz reversal, as many as seven out of eleven (7/11) subjects failed to see motion but activation in MT+/V5 was found in the majority (5/7) of the subjects. The results demonstrated that significant MT+/V5 activation occurs without accompanying subjective awareness of seeing motion in an apparent-motion stimulus, indicating that neural activity in MT+/V5 does not represent a sufficient condition for conscious perception of motion in vision.
Circularvection (CV), the optokinetically induced perception of self-motion, is based neurophysiologically upon visual-vestibular convergence. It is yet not known which visual pathways--subcortical accessory optic tract and/or cortical striate projection--convey optokinetic information to the central vestibular system in order to make possible the convergence that has been found: the vestibular nuclei, the thalamus and the vestibular cortex. The functional significance of the visual cortex was demonstrated in 12 patients with homonymous hemianopia who neither perceived CV nor exhibited a postural destabilization when exposed to optokinetic pattern motion (yaw or roll) restricted to the scotoma. The functional significance of the vestibular cortex as well as ipsilateral visual-vestibular interaction was demonstrated in 4 (out of 20) patients with tumour lesions involving the vestibular cortex areas. They either failed to perceive CV or showed a significant increase of CV-latencies when monocular optokinetic stimulation was restricted to the ipsilateral visual cortex. Arguments for and against the following hypothesis are discussed: circularvection is induced by visual motion stimulation of the primary visual cortex which then activates vestibular nuclei neurons by descending pathways and which also informs the vestibular cortex that self-motion with a perceptual direction is involved. Determination of the velocity of CV is mediated by direct visual-vestibular cortex interaction, which most probably is also involved in the perceptual interpretation of motion perception: Self-motion versus object-motion.
In motion perception, luminance-defined stimuli (first-order motion) are distinguished from stimuli defined by more complex attributes (second-order motion), because they differ in their processing requirements. For instance, a two-layer model with the output of an array of elementary motion detectors (EMD's) feeding into a second array of EMD's has been proposed to account for seeing the movement of motion-defined objects. The question is raised whether this processing scheme is operating across the whole visual field or whether second-order motion perception is restricted to the fovea. The detection, orientation discrimination, and motion direction discrimination of oblique, vertically moving bars was tested at horizontal eccentricities between 0 degree and 16 degrees. Bars were defined on a dynamic noise background by an area of static dots (drift-balanced motion) or by coherent dot motion either in the direction of the bar motion (Fourier motion) or in the orthogonal direction (theta motion). Coherence thresholds for direction discrimination are severely impaired in the periphery for both types of second-order motion but not for Fourier motion, whereas orientation discrimination and detection marginally decline for all three bar types when the stimuli are presented further out in the periphery. In a control experiment it is shown that this result cannot be due entirely to the changes in spatial scale of the peripheral visual system. The facts that motion-defined objects can be detected in the periphery and that their orientation can be detected, but not their direction of motion, supports the view that the two-layer system suggested for the processing of theta motion is restricted to the central region of the visual field.
There have been numerous experimental studies on human perception and misperception of self-motion and orientation relative to the earth, each focusing on one or a few types of motion. We present a formal framework encompassing many types of motion and including all angular and linear components of velocity and acceleration. Using a mathematically rigorous presentation, the framework defines the space of all possible motions, the map from motion to sensor status, the space containing each possible status of the sensors, and the map from sensor status to perceived motion. The shape of the full perceptual map from actual motion to perceived motion is investigated with the framework, using formal theory and a number of published experimental results. Two principles of simple motion perception and four principles of complex motion perception are presented. The framework also distinguishes the roles of physics and the nervous system in the process of self-motion perception for both simple and complex motions. The present rigorous development of the self-motion perception framework allows the scientist to compare and contrast results from many studies with differing types of motion. The six principles formalized here comprise a foundation with which to explain and predict perceptual phenomena, both those observed in the past and those to be encountered in the future. The framework is especially aimed to expand our capacity to investigate complex motions such as those encountered in everyday life or in unusual motion environments.
We present an ambiguous motion paradigm that allows us to quantify the influence of aspects of form relevant to the perception of apparent motion. We report on the role of bar element orientation in motion paths. The effect of orientation differences between bar elements in a motion path is small with respect to the crucial role of the orientation of bar elements relative to motion direction. Motion perception between elements oriented along the motion direction dominates motion perception between elements oriented perpendicularly to motion direction. The perception of apparent motion is affected by bar length and width and is anisotropic.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the nature of motion perception deficits in primary open-angle glaucoma by measuring the sensitivity of simple (luminance-defined) and complex (texture-defined) motion, the latter requiring supplementary neural processing to be resolved. These findings will help address the possible extent of the cortical damage in glaucoma that has been recently demonstrated by anatomic and physiological studies. They also serve the purpose of establishing which motion paradigms would be most appropriate for assessing glaucoma-related functional loss. METHODS: Direction-identification thresholds for first-order and second-order motion were measured for 26 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (for both phakic and pseudophakic) and 18 nonglaucomatous observers. RESULTS: The glaucomatous observers showed significantly increased motion thresholds for both first- and second-order motion conditions when compared with nonglaucomatous observers. However, the relative increase in threshold for first-order motion did not differ significantly from that of second-order motion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings imply that there is no measurable higher-level cortical function damage caused by the glaucomatous process because no greater loss in second-order motion was observed. Based on the results, we suggest that motion paradigms used to assess functional loss in primary open-angle glaucoma should consist of simple, first-order type stimuli to minimize potential confounds such as those introduced by both the normal and pathologic aging process on complex motion processing (i.e., perimetry using complex motion stimuli).
Threshold perception of motion of the digits was obtained in 14 normal subjects. The metacarpophalangeal joint of the index and the fifth finger of each hand and the metatarsophalangeal joint of the hallux of each foot were passively moved up and down with respect to a horizontal plane defined by the palmar or plantar surface. The motion was sinusoidal at frequencies of 0.5 and 5.0 Hz. A mpdified von Békésy paradigm similar to that used in audiometry was utilized to yield threshold levels of motion sensation. There was little difference in the thresholds obtained for the different joints. The difference between high- and low-frequency stimulation, however, was significant (p less than 0.001): the 0.5 Hz threshold was found to range from 0.8 to 1.0 degree, whereas the 5.0 Hz threshold varied from 0.4 to 0.6 degree. It is thought that motion sense is largely dependent on joint receptor contributions, but muscle and cutaneous receptors may also contribute to this proprioceptive sensation.
Contrast modulation of a set of features in a Glass pattern invokes, under certain circumstances, the perception of motion in the absence of any physical displacements. The illusion is spatially limited to within about 10' and is governed by contrast relationships. We find that the detected motion in these situations is due to local computations the results of which can be integrated over retinal areas of more than 1 degree. The possible motion detection mechanisms are discussed within the framework of the Reichardt/Hassenstein and Marr/Ullman type of motion detectors.
To determine the effects of stimulus length and orientation on the perception of motion, 5 experienced subjects responded with a simple reaction to accelerating lines in peripheral vision while fixating on a reference cross at the center of a cathode-ray tube. Three experimental variables were involved: (a) line length, (b) direction of motion, and (c) orientation of the line with respect to the motion. Simple reaction time (RT) was significantly longer for vertical than for horizontal motion and for lines oriented in-line with the direction of motion than for lines oriented perpendicular to the direction of motion. A significant interaction was found between line length and orientation. The results show that the generalization that RT is shorter for small objects than for large objects must be modified in terms of the orientation of the object.
We compare two types of sampled motion stimuli: ordinary periodic displays with modulation amplitude m(o=e) that translate 90 degrees between successive frames and amplifier sandwich displays. In sandwich displays, even-numbered frames are of one type, odd-numbered frames are of the same or different type, and (1) both types have the same period, (2) translate in a consistent direction 90 degrees between frames, and (3) even frames have modulation amplitude m(e), odd frames have modulation amplitude m(o). In both first-order motion (van Santen, J.P.H. & Sperling, G. (1984). Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 451-73) and second-order motion (Werkhoven, P., Sperling, G., & Chubb, C. (1993). Motion perception between dissimilar gratings: a single channel theory. Vision Research, 33, 463-85) the motion strength of amplifier sandwich displays is proportional to the product m(o)m(e) for a wide range of m(e). By setting m(e) to a large value, an amplifier sandwich stimulus with a very small value of m(o) can still produce visible motion. The amplification factor is the ratio of two threshold modulation amplitudes: ordinary circumflexm(o=e) over amplified circumflexm(o), circumflexm(o=e)/circumflexm(o). We find amplification factors of up to about 8x. Light adaptation and contrast gain control in early visual processing distort the representations of visual stimuli so that inputs to subsequent perceptual processes contain undesired distortion products or 'impurities'. Motion amplification is used to measure and thence to reduce these unwanted components in a stimulus to a small fraction of their threshold. Such stimuli are certifiably pure in the sense that the residual impurity is less than a specified value. Six applications are considered: (1) removing (first-order) luminance contamination from moving (second-order) texture gratings; (2) removing luminance contamination from moving chromatic gratings to produce pure isoluminant gratings; (3) removing distortion products in luminance-modulated (first-order) gratings - by iterative application, all significant distortion products can be removed; (4) removing second-order texture contamination from third-order motion displays; (5) removing feature bias from third-order motion displays; (6) and the same general principles are applied to texture-slant discrimination in which x,y spatial coordinates replace the x,t motion coordinates. In all applicable domains, the amplification principle provides a powerful assay method for the precise measurement of very weak stimuli, and thereby a means of producing visual displays of certifiable purity.
Perceived motion may be a stimulus for anticipatory slow eye movements. To test this possibility, the production of anticipatory slow eye movements in humans was studied using apparent motion stimuli. Short range apparent motion was produced with random dot stimuli and the anticipatory slow eye movements were isolated from the smooth pursuit responses by occasionally including trials in which the random dot stimulus did not appear. Long range apparent motion was produced with subjective contour stimuli. Both short range and long range apparent motion were found to be effective stimuli for anticipatory slow eye movements. The prominence of perceived motion was altered by changing the spatiotemporal displacement intervals in the short range apparent motion stimuli. Changing the subjective contours also changed the motion percepts of the long range apparent motion stimuli. With both stimuli, the peak anticipatory slow eye velocities that were achieved decreased as the prominence of the motion percepts decreased, while the time-course of the anticipatory responses were similar under the different conditions. These findings indicate that the expectation of perceived motion is necessary for anticipatory slow eye movements.
We examined the role of feature matching in motion perception. The stimulus sequence was constructed from a vertical, 1 cycle deg-1 sinusoidal grating divided into horizontal strips of equal height, where alternate strips moved leftward and rightward. The initial relative phase of adjacent strips was either 0 degree (aligned) or 90 degrees (non-aligned) and the motion was sampled at 90 degrees phase steps. A blank interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0-117 ms was introduced between each 33 ms presentation of the stimulus frames. The observers had to identify the direction of motion of the central strip. Motion was perceived correctly at short ISIs, but at longer ISIs performance was much better for the non-aligned sequence than the aligned sequence. This difference in performance may reflect a role for feature correspondence and grouping of features in motion perception at longer ISIs. In the aligned sequence half the frames consisted of a single coherent vertical grating, while the interleaved frames contained short strips. We argue that to achieve feature matching over time, the long edge and bar features must be broken up perceptually (segmented) into shorter elements before these short segments can appear to move in opposite directions. This idea correctly predicted that overlaying narrow, stationary, black horizontal lines at the junctions of the grating strips would improve performance in the aligned condition. The results support the view that, in addition to motion energy, feature analysis and feature tracking play an important role in motion perception.
This study shows the temporal dynamics of neurophysiological activities in illusory motion perception. Event-related brain potentials were recorded from 12 healthy subjects while they performed a two-alternative (motion/no motion), forced-choice task using the line motion method. Amplitudes of a late positive component at Fz, Cz, Pz, O1 and O2 increased as cue lead time (CLT) increased. At a CLT of 50 ms, the amplitudes of the late positive component (the peak latency at O1, O2: 310 ms; Fz, Cz, Pz: 360-390 ms) observed during illusory motion perception was larger than that observed during no motion perception, even though the physical stimuli were the same. These results suggest that the perception of illusory motion correlates to a relatively late stage of visual information processing.
PURPOSE: To determine whether motion perception of short-wavelength sensitive(SWS) cones is capable of predicting primary open angle glaucoma(POAG) optic neuropathy. METHODS: Motion perceptions of SWS cones were isolated by Blue random dot stimulus displayed on the Yellow background, then the detecting displacement threshold of motion perception from SWS cone in POAG was measured, and compared with the age-matched normal group. RESULTS: The detecting displacement thresholds of motion perception from SWS cones in 8 sites of 15 degrees were all elevated in POAG compared with the normal group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that motion perception of SWS cones may reveal preclinical visual nerve damage in early POAG.
Most of the histopathological and psychophysical studies in glaucoma reveal a preferential damage to the magnocellular (M) pathway although a few of them support a damage to the parvocellular (P) pathway as well. In glaucoma, the visual fields are usually evaluated by conventional perimetry. However, it has been demonstrated that 20-40% of ganglion cells are lost before field defects are detected using conventional perimetry. Therefore, new psychophysical tests have recently been designed in order to specifically isolate and evaluate the visual mechanisms that are impaired at the early stages of glaucoma. In this context, several authors have addressed the issue of motion perception under the hypothesis of a predominant damage of the M pathway in glaucoma, and that motion perception is mediated mainly by M pathway. The results of these studies depict a large variation in the percentage of patients showing anomalous motion perception. Overall, motion thresholds are elevated in both glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients as compared to control subjects, irrespective of the stimulus size and eccentricity. The test which discriminates best between patients and normal subjects is motion perimetry. The visual field defects in glaucoma patients identified by conventional perimetry and motion perimetry are similar, but the sizes of the defects are usually larger with motion perimetry. However, motion tests in central vision have no correlation with visual field defect on conventional perimetry. In glaucoma, loss of performance on motion perception tests does not necessarily support the existence of a specific deficit in the M pathway, because some behavioral studies suggest that the P pathway can also mediate motion perception. It is also difficult to conclude that motion perception is specifically affected in glaucoma because most of these studies do not yield a comparison with other visual functions. Despite these difficulties, localized motion perception tests at eccentricities of more than 15 degrees can be considered as a promising diagnostic tool.
A neural model of motion perception simulates psychophysical data concerning first-order and second-order motion stimuli, including the reversal of perceived motion direction with distance from the stimulus (gamma display), and data about directional judgments as a function of relative spatial phase or spatial and temporal frequency. Many other second-order motion percepts that have ascribed to a second non-Fourier processing stream can also be explained in the model by interactions between ON and OFF cells within a single, neurobiologically interpreted magnocellular processing stream. Yet other percepts may be traced to interactions between form and motion processing streams, rather than to processing within multiple motion processing streams. The model hereby explains why monkeys with lesions of the parvocellular layers, but not of the magnocellular layers, of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are capable of detecting the correct direction of second-order motion, why most cells in area MT are sensitive to both first-order and second-order motion, and why after 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate injection selectively blocks retinal ON bipolar cells, cortical cells are sensitive only to the motion of a moving bright bar's trailing edge. Magnocellular LGN cells show relatively transient responses, whereas parvocellular LGN cells show relatively sustained responses. Correspondingly, the model bases its directional estimates on the outputs of model ON and OFF transient cells that are organized in opponent circuits wherein antagonistic rebounds occur in response to stimulus offset. Center-surround interactions convert these ON and OFF outputs into responses of lightening and darkening cells that are sensitive both to direct inputs and to rebound responses in their receptive field centers and surrounds. The total pattern of activity increments and decrements is used by subsequent processing stages (spatially short-range filters, competitive interactions, spatially long-range filters, and directional grouping cells) to determine the perceived direction of motion.