SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neck Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Neck dissections: radical to conservative.

BACKGROUND: Neck dissection is an important surgical procedure for the management of metastatic nodal disease in the neck. The gold standard of neck nodal management has been the radical neck dissection. Any modification in the neck dissection is always compared with this standard. Over the last few decades, in order to alleviate the morbidity of radical neck dissection, several modifications and conservative procedures have been advocated. These procedures retain certain lymphatic or non-lymphatic structures and have been shown not to compromise oncological safety. METHODS: A literature search of the Medline was carried out for all articles on neck dissections. The articles were systematically reviewed to analyze and trace the evolution of neck dissection. These were then categorized to address the nomenclature, management of node positive and node negative neck including those who had received chemoradiation. RESULTS: The present article discusses the neck nodal nomenclature, the radical neck dissection, its modifications and migration to more conservative procedures and possible advances in the near future. CONCLUSION: Radical neck dissection is now replaced with modified radical neck dissections in most situations. Attempts are being made to replace modified radical neck dissections with selective neck dissections for early node positivity. Sentinel node biopsy is being studied to address the issue of node negative neck. More conservative surgeries are likely to replace the 'radical' surgeries of bygone era. This process is facilitated by earlier detection of the disease and better understanding of cancer biology.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1999

Planned neck dissection as an adjunct to the management of patients with advanced neck disease treated with definitive radiotherapy: for some or for all?

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with head and neck carcinoma and advanced nodal disease is controversial. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of definitive radiotherapy followed by planned neck dissection in patients with bulky neck disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 52 patients who were treated between 1989 and 1995 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute with a planned neck dissection after radical radiotherapy were reviewed. All had advanced neck disease with one or more nodes >/=3 cm in maximum diameter, 94% being staged N2-3. The most common primary site was the oropharynx (56%). Sixty percent of patients had either T2 or T3 primaries and all were AJCC stage IV. Treatment consisted of high-dose radiotherapy to the primary and involved neck sites using various fractionation protocols followed by radical or modified radical neck dissection after confirmation of a complete response at the primary site. The median follow-up for living patients was 58 months (range 32-97). RESULTS: There were nine regional failures, of which three were outside the dissected neck, yielding a 5-year actuarial overall neck control rate of 83% and an in-field control rate of 88%. In-field control rates by neck stage were N1 3/3; N2 31/35; N3 11/13 and NX 1/1. There was only one in-field failure among 28 patients who had pathologically negative neck specimens compared with five in 24 patients with morphologic evidence of residual disease. Of the 24 patients with pathologically positive necks, 5 were long-term survivors and were probably cured by their surgery. Another 4 died of intercurrent disease without documented recurrence of their head and neck cancer. Ten patients recurred at their primary sites (5-year actuarial control 79%) and 8 developed distant metastases (5-year actuarial rate 20%). A total of 21 patients failed at one or more sites and none was salvaged. Five-year actuarial disease-free survival was 57% and overall survival 38%. Nine patients (17%) sustained significant complications following neck dissection. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced neck disease who are treated primarily with radical radiotherapy, planned neck dissection provides excellent regional control and appears to cure a subset of patients. However, routine neck dissection adds significant morbidity to treatment and should ideally be avoided in those patients in whom surgery is either unnecessary (no residual tumor) or futile (unsalvageable disease recurrence outside the dissected neck). Based on our analysis and other recently reported series, we now recommend observing patients who have a complete response to high-dose radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy). The ability of PET imaging to detect residual viable tumor in the head and neck or at distant sites is under investigation.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Selective neck dissection for node-positive necks in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a word of caution.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the regional recurrence (RR) rate in a consecutive series of patients with node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (N(+) HNSCC) who underwent selective neck dissection (SND) as part of their treatment in a single institution. DESIGN: Retrospective case series with 2 years of follow-up. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-one patients with N(+) HNSCC underwent 256 neck dissections (NDs) between 1999 and 2002. Of these, 17 had unilateral SNDs and 11 had bilateral NDs (6 patients, bilateral SND; 5 patients, radical ND and SND). There were 22 men and 6 women, ranging in age from 37 to 79 years (median age, 53 years), with 17 laryngeal, 5 hypopharyngeal, 4 oral cavity, 1 oropharyngeal, and 1 nasopharyngeal primary tumors, which were classified as follows: T1 (n=2 [7.1%]), T2 (n=2 [7.1%]), T3 (n=7 [25.0%]), and T4 (n=17 [60.8%]). The neck stages were N1 (n=8 [28.6%]), N2a (n=2 [7.1%]), N2b (n=7 [25.0%]), and N2c (n=11 [39.3%]). Most patients had tumors that were stage III (14.3%) or stage IV (85.7%) and had undergone postoperative radiotherapy. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years (median follow-up period, 36 months). Two patients (7.1%) died of postoperative complications, and 2 became unavailable for follow-up before 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The RR rate. RESULTS: There were 4 RRs (11.8%) among 34 patients who underwent SND, and 2 RRs (40%) among 5 patients who underwent radical ND. None of the patients with T1 or T2 tumors had recurrences; 1 (14.3%) of 7 patients with T3 tumors and 3 (17.6%) of 17 patients with T4 disease had RRs. One (12.5%) of 8 patients with N1 stage cancer, none of 2 patients with N2a stage cancer, 2 (28.6%) of 7 patients with N2b stage cancer, and 1 (9.1%) of 11 patients with N2c stage cancer had RRs. CONCLUSIONS: The RR rate was acceptable in patients with T1/T2 tumors and N1 nodal stage disease. However, it was higher in those with advanced T tumors and/or N2b stage cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Number to treat analysis for planned neck dissection after organ preservation therapy with advanced neck disease.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a number to treat analysis for planned neck dissection after organ preservation protocols (OPPs) in N2-3 neck disease for head and neck cancer. METHODS: We performed a literature review from 1993 to the present and collected aggregate data to produce the following four variables: (1) percentage of N2-3 necks still harbouring cancer after radiotherapy in OPPs (C); (2) percentage of regional recurrence after planned neck dissection (P); (3) unsuccessful salvage rate in patients in whom a watch and wait strategy for neck disease was employed (S); and (4) the mortality rate of planned neck dissection (M). The number to treat can be estimated as 1/((C x S + C x M) - (P + M)) RESULTS: The number to treat in this analysis was 4.4. SUMMARY: In organ preservation therapy with N2-3 disease, one needs to perform 4.4 neck dissections to prevent one fatal regional recurrence. Although this calculation does have some inherent biases and errors, it may form the basis for an informed discussion with patients faced with the option of planned neck dissection.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗

PubMed2006

Role of neck dissection following concurrent chemoradiation for advanced head and neck carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Our primary objective was to determine the role of neck dissection following concomitant chemoradiation (CRT) for advanced stage III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: One hundred eighty-four patients with HNSCC treated with CRT were included. One hundred twenty-three patients reached a regional complete response (CR) after CRT and no neck dissection was performed. Forty-five patients among the 58 who reached a regional partial response (PR) underwent a neck dissection. RESULTS: Overall, regional CR rate after CRT was 68%. Patients who reached a regional CR (no neck dissection) had an overall neck recurrence rate of 5%. Patients with regional PR who underwent a neck dissection had a 7% neck recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with regional CR not followed by a neck dissection have a low rate of neck recurrence. Systematic neck dissection is not mandatory for patients with nodes less than 6 cm reaching a regional CR. For patients with nodes larger than 6 cm, no firm recommendation can be given because of the small number of patients in this series. If the regional response is incomplete, cervical dissection is warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Rationale for elective neck dissection in 1990.

Elective neck dissection has long been a subject of debate among surgeons. The proponents of elective neck dissection base their rationale on studies that show a 30% incidence of occult disease in those situations for which elective neck dissection is recommended. One hundred eighty-two patients with advanced stages of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were studied. All patients had preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, and all patients had some form of radical neck dissection. The sensitivity of clinical exam was compared with the sensitivity of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in ability to detect nodal disease. The sensitivity of clinical exam alone was 71.7%, while the sensitivity of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was 91.1%. Based on physical exam alone, there would be a 39% rate of occult disease; if computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging data is combined with physical exam, the occult disease rate would drop to 12%. All centers performing elective neck dissection must reassess their rationale or restudy their occult disease rate with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed2006

Postradiotherapy neck dissection for lymph node-positive head and neck cancer: the use of computed tomography to manage the neck.

PURPOSE: To determine how to use node response on computed tomography (CT) to indicate the need for neck dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred fifty patients with lymph node-positive head and neck cancer were treated between 1990 and 2002 with radiotherapy (RT) at a median dose of 74.4 Gy; 24% of these patients (n = 133) were treated with chemotherapy. Three hundred forty-one patients (62%) underwent planned post-RT neck dissection. Physical examination and contrast-enhanced CT were performed 30 days after completion of RT. CT images were reviewed in 211 patients for lymph node size (largest axial dimension) and presence of a focal abnormality (lucency, enhancement, or calcification). By correlating post-RT CT to neck dissection pathology, criteria associated with a low likelihood of residual disease were identified. A subset of patients who fit these criteria of radiographic response who did not undergo post-RT neck dissection was observed for recurrence. RESULTS: Radiographic complete response (rCR) was defined as the absence of any large (> 1.5 cm) or focally abnormal lymph node. Correlation of response with neck dissection pathology indicated a negative predictive value of 77% for complete clinical response and 94% for rCR. In 32 patients (median follow-up time, 3.2 years) with rCR who did not undergo post-RT neck dissection, the 5-year ultimate neck control rate (100%) and cause-specific survival rate (72%) were not significantly different from the rates of patients with a negative post-RT neck dissection. CONCLUSION: Patients with rCR 4 weeks after RT can be spared from a post-RT neck dissection regardless of initial node stage.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Functional neck dissection for the clinically negative neck: effectiveness and controversies.

This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of functional neck dissection in controlling metastasis to the clinically negative (cN0) neck, focusing on recurrences in the pathologically negative (pN0) neck and the role of extracapsular spread in the cN0 neck. A series of 172 patients (253 dissected fields) treated for cN0 laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer with a 5-year minimum follow-up is presented. Occult metastasis was observed in 30% of the patients. Extracapsular spread was present in 39% of the positive nodes. The neck recurrence rate was 5.2%. Surgical specimens from cases of neck recurrence in pN0 necks were reevaluated for micrometastasis by immunostaining with antibody for cytokeratins. The immunohistochemical findings were positive in 1 of 4 cases. Functional neck dissection provides good neck control and survival rates for the cN0 neck. The accurate prognostic significance of extracapsular spread in cN0 necks is still unknown. Micrometastasis alone may be insufficient to explain recurrences in pN0 necks.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Internal jugular vein thrombosis following modified neck dissection: implications for head and neck flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of internal jugular vein thrombosis (IJVT) following a modified neck dissection remains uncertain. The effect of, or consequences following, IJVT upon pedicled and free flap head and neck reconstructions remains unexplored. METHODS: Twenty-nine preserved internal jugular veins in 24 patients undergoing modified neck dissection were available for prospective study. All patients required a pedicled or free flap reconstruction and received a modified, unilateral or bilateral cervical lymphadenectomy. The patency of all jugular veins was determined preoperatively and postoperatively using a combination of computed tomography (CT) scanning, high-resolution ultrasound, and color-flow Doppler (CFD). RESULTS: The IJVT rate was 14%. The presence of a pedicled myocutaneous flap and left-sided jugular dissections may represent risks to the postoperative patency of the internal jugular vein. Preoperative radiotherapy did not appear to impact negatively upon the thrombosis rate. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombosis of the internal jugular vein may result in significant morbidity for the postoperative oncologic patient. An internal jugular-dependent-free-tissue transfer may risk venous compromise of the flap, whereas the use of a pedicled flap may place the jugular at increased risk for thrombosis. Strategies for deep venous system microvascular recipient recruitment in the head and neck are discussed. Wherever possible, we employ two deep venous systems, the internal jugular, and subclavian (via the external jugular) for flap drainage.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Is selective neck dissection sufficient treatment for the N0/Np+ neck?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic role of selective neck dissection performed electively in the N0 patient. METHOD: Fifty-four patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx, without clinical evidence of lymph node metastases, underwent 72 selective neck dissections over a 6-year period. The preoperative tumour and patient data were recorded in all patients. Mean follow-up was 59 months. Outcome data pertaining to pathologic nodal status, tumour recurrence, and survival were recorded on all patients. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of patients were histologically and clinically node negative. Seven percent of N0/Np0 patients failed in the neck compared to 50% of patients with occult nodal metastases (N0/Np+). Salvage treatment following nodal recurrence was successful in only one patient. CONCLUSION: Selective neck dissection does not compromise survival and may minimize surgical morbidity in the N0/Np+ population.

Adult↗

PubMed1980

Bilateral radical neck dissections.

Of 697 patients undergoing radical neck dissection for head and neck cancer, 91 (13%) had bilateral radical neck dissection. No operative deaths occurred. The complication rate was least for staged second neck dissections (17 patients). While overall surgical and medical complication rates for simultaneous bilateral neck dissections (11 patients) were greater than those after staged and delayed (53 patients) neck dissections, surgical complication rates alone for these three groups were comparable. The combined group of patients treated aggressively by simultaneous or staged second neck dissection had no greater complication rate than patients (ten) treated by second neck dissection when metastasis became clinically evident later. These findings and evidence that 55% of these patients were alive after five years or died of unrelated causes encourage us to support more aggressive surgical therapy in patients with manifest or likely occult bilateral metastases from a head and neck primary carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Examining the need for neck dissection in the era of chemoradiation therapy for advanced head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) determine clinical factors that predict pathologic complete response (pCR) on neck dissection after sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for advanced head and neck cancer and (2) compare survival parameters between those who underwent neck dissection and those who did not among those patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) in the neck after SCRT, thus assessing the benefit of neck dissection in patients with a cCR in the neck. DESIGN: Retrospective review with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. SETTING: Regional cancer center. PATIENTS: The study population comprised 55 patients undergoing SCRT for advanced head and neck cancer with N2 or N3 neck disease. Three patients developed progressive disease and were excluded, and 28 patients underwent neck dissection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assessed by physical examination and radiographically after SCRT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical examination and radiographic assessments of residual neck disease were compared with pathologic findings in those patients who underwent neck dissection. Survival comparisons were made between patients with a cCR in the neck who underwent neck dissection and those who did not. RESULTS: Of 28 patients who underwent neck dissection, 8 had persistent pathologically positive nodal disease: 5 (45%) of 11 had N3 and 3 (18%) of 17 had N2 disease. Individual clinical neck assessments after SCRT were fairly predictive of a negative pathologic finding at neck dissection. The negative predictive values were physical examination (75%), computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (71%), and positron emission tomography (75%). However, when physical examination, imaging studies, and positron emission tomography all indicated a complete response, this accurately predicted a pCR on neck dissection. There appeared to be no improvement in survival parameters when a neck dissection was performed on patients with a cCR in the neck. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with N3 disease are at high risk for residual neck metastasis after SCRT. Patients with N2 disease can be assessed with physical examination, imaging studies, and positron emission tomography. If these all indicate a cCR, then neck dissection is likely not needed. Neck dissection did not appear to further improve survival parameters for patients with a cCR in the neck.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Accessory nerve damages and impaired shoulder movements after neck dissections.

PURPOSE: After neck dissection, where the accessory nerve is often excised patients usually complain of impaired shoulder movements. The accessory nerve forms a plexus with branches of the cervical nerves C2, C3, and C4. In the present study, the accessory nerve was examined during neck dissections to clarify the incidence of motor fibers in joining branches, and the function of the motor fibers was evaluated postoperatively in relation to shoulder movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Presence of cervical contributions to the accessory nerve were examined in 20 neck sides in 15 patients. Postoperative function of the shoulder movements was evaluated by manual muscle testing (MMT) and electromyography (EMG). RESULTS: Motor fibers in cervical contributions were noted on four sides (20%) by stimulation of joining branches. When the accessory nerve was excised, scapular elevation was rarely impaired even if there were no motor fibers in the cervical contributions. Excision of the accessory nerve caused poor scapular adduction and impaired scapular depression and adduction in most cases even if motor fibers in the cervical contributions existed. CONCLUSION: Postoperative impairment of scapular movements was not attributed to the presence or absence of motor fibers in joining branches. Results obtained with electromyography did not represent the practical function of the muscle.

Accessory Nerve↗

PubMed1999

Radiotherapy followed by neck dissection for small head and neck cancers with advanced cervical metastases.

Patients with small or occult primary carcinomas of the head and neck with advanced cervical metastases present a difficult problem for the otolaryngologist. A retrospective review was performed of patients who presented to UCLA Medical Center between January 1986 and June 1996 with small or occult primary tumors of the head and neck with advanced cervical metastases. The treatment algorithm consisted of initial radiotherapy to the primary site and the neck, followed in 6 to 8 weeks with endoscopy and biopsy of the primary tumor site. As long as the repeat biopsy of the primary tumor site was negative by frozen section, an immediate neck dissection was performed, even if no residual neck disease was present. Almost 40% of patients with no clinical evidence of neck disease following radiotherapy had evidence of metastatic cancer on histopathologic examination. While some would consider a watchful waiting policy when there is no clinically detectable neck disease following radiotherapy, we believe it is preferable to perform immediate surgery in such patients, in light of the high incidence of microscopic metastatic disease.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed2004

Soft tissue deposits in neck dissections of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: prospective analysis of prevalence, survival, and its implications.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue deposits of squamous cell carcinoma in the necks of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract may represent either total effacement of a lymph node by carcinoma or extralymphatic deposits of carcinoma. There are few reports of their clinical or prognostic significance. METHODS: Data from 215 neck dissections from 155 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract were studied prospectively to assess the prevalence of soft tissue deposits within the neck. The case notes of these patients were subsequently reviewed to analyze the effect on both the overall survival and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: The prevalence rate for soft tissue deposits occurring alone was 10.3%; the prevalence rate for soft tissue deposits occurring with extracapsular spread was 13.5%. The overall prevalence rate for soft tissue deposits was 23.9%. There was a statistically significant reduction in actuarial and recurrence-free survival in patients with soft tissue deposits compared with patients with pathologically node-negative necks (P=.001), and in patients with soft tissue deposits compared with those with pathologically node-positive necks without extracapsular spread (P=.001). No statistically significant differences were found between patients with soft tissue deposits and patients with pathologically node-positive necks with extracapsular spread, for actuarial survival or recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, soft tissue deposits were associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor survival. It is therefore important that histopathologists agree on a uniform terminology when reporting soft tissue deposits and actively look for their presence when examining neck dissection specimens.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗

PubMed1998

J incision in neck dissections.

Metastasis in the neck lymph system of primary tumours of the head and neck is frequently seen. In order to prevent this metastasis, neck dissection is carried out by various types of skin incisions. In this study, types of skin incision used in neck dissections were defined, and the advantages, disadvantages and results of J incisions, which have been performed on 320 radical neck dissection patients in our clinic between 1985-1996, were compared with those of other incision types.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Clinical course of thyroid carcinoma after neck dissection.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the rate and site of recurrences in patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma who underwent a central compartment dissection, a posterolateral neck dissection, or a combination of both procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: The charts of 522 consecutive patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma were reviewed, and 74 patients who had undergone a neck dissection were identified. The rates of recurrence in three sites were noted: the central compartment nodes (levels VI, superior mediastinum), posterolateral compartment neck nodes (levels II-V), and distant sites. These rates were compared in patients who underwent a central compartment dissection (level VI, superior mediastinum) and in patients who underwent a posterolateral neck dissection (levels II-V). RESULTS: Six patients underwent only a central compartment dissection, 47 patients had only a posterolateral neck dissection, and 21 patients had both a central compartment and a posterolateral neck dissection. In these three groups there were zero, two, and two central compartment node recurrences; two, nine, and seven posterolateral neck recurrences; and zero, two, and three distant recurrences, respectively. There were no significant differences in the rate of recurrence in any of the three sites examined between any of the three treatment groups (Fisher's Exact test, all P values >.20). CONCLUSION: In patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma, dissection of only the central or posterolateral compartments of the neck with clinical or radiographic evidence of disease is advocated.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Positron emission tomography scan to determine the need for neck dissection after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer: timing is everything.

UNLABELLED: We present a case of a negative positron emission tomography (PET) scan in a patient with pathologic viable cancer at neck dissection. STUDY DESIGN: Case Report. METHODS: A 69-year-old man presented with clinical stage T2N2c squamous cell cancer of the left tonsil and was treated with definitive chemoradiation. Left-sided adenopathy decreased but remained palpable after therapy. RESULTS: PET scan performed 23 days after completion of treatment showed no suspicious uptake in the left neck. Neck dissection performed at 2 months post-therapy revealed viable tumor in left cervical nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent adenopathy after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer remains a clinical dilemma. A negative PET scan is accurate but only if the scan is performed 3 to 4 months after therapy.

Aged↗