[Controversies in preventive health care. II. Preconceptional and prenatal care].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antibodies, Viral↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “PRENATAL CARE”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Controversies in preventive health care. II. Preconceptional and prenatal care].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Female↗
The status of prenatal care among Medicaid Managed Care patients in Connecticut.
Providing quality prenatal care to high-risk, pregnant adolescents represents an important challenge to health care providers and health plans. Using national prenatal care guidelines, this study sought to evaluate the quality of important processes and outcomes of prenatal care delivered to women age 21 years and younger enrolled in three health plans serving the Connecticut Medicaid population. Some important findings include 93% compliance with recommended processes of prenatal care, an 11% C-section rate, an average length of hospital stay of 4.0 days for women having a C-section, and a 10% premature delivery rate. Opportunities for improvement include 40% failing to begin prenatal care in the first trimester, 31% not receiving the recommended number of prenatal care visits, and 8% delivering a low-birth-weight infant. This study provides important descriptive information on processes and outcomes of care for pregnant adolescents within Medicaid Managed Care and also identifies opportunities for improvement.
Adolescent↗
Differentiating the barriers to adequate prenatal care in Missouri, 1987-88.
Inadequate prenatal care has previously been identified as a significant risk factor for women who have low birth weight infants and infants who die during the neonatal period. Postpartum interviews with 1,484 primarily low-income women were conducted during 1987-88 in three areas of Missouri with the highest rates of inadequate prenatal care. The purpose of the study was to identify barriers to prenatal care and to determine which barriers differentiated between women receiving adequate and those receiving inadequate prenatal care. Women who received inadequate prenatal care were more likely to be black, unmarried, higher parity, and have less education than those who received adequate care. These women were also more likely to be poor, Medicaid-eligible, to have had an unwanted pregnancy, more stress and problems during pregnancy, and less social support. In the multivariate analysis, race and marital status lost their importance. The strongest predictor of inadequate prenatal care was women not knowing that they were pregnant in the first 4 months of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio 9.28). To improve the rate of adequate prenatal care, society must address the issues of poverty and wantedness of pregnancy.
Black or African American↗
Prenatal care characteristics and African-American women's satisfaction with care in a managed care organization.
This study examined the characteristics of prenatal care affecting women's satisfaction for two groups of African-American women, those with Medicaid insurance and those with commercial insurance, who sought care through a large managed care organization in the Midwest. African-American pregnant managed care patients (n = 400), regardless of payer status, were more satisfied when their providers spent more time with them and when their providers engaged them by explaining procedures, asking them questions, and answering their questions. Satisfaction was also higher for both Medicaid (n = 125) and commercially insured women (n = 275) when the waiting room was clean and comfortable. The care characteristics most important to an African-American woman's satisfaction with prenatal care do not appear to be dependent on her payer status, nor do they seem to be particularly dependent on the financial arrangements of her care provider. While improvements in health care delivery tend to focus on increasing technical proficiency to improve pregnant women's satisfaction with care, prenatal care providers should focus on improvements in patient-provider communication, as well as features of the prenatal care setting (e.g., cleanliness, waiting times, availability of ancillary services).
Adult↗
The effects of insurance coverage on the quality of prenatal care.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of prenatal care provided to patients with traditional fee-for-service, health maintenance organization, and Medicaid insurance using an evidence-based, community-derived prenatal care guideline. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven private and hospital-based prenatal care sites in a suburban county in southeast Michigan. PATIENTS: A stratified random sample of 267 patients (93 with Medicaid, 92 with health maintenance organization, and 82 with fee-for-service insurance) receiving prenatal care from community physicians (obstetricians-gynecologists and family practitioners) between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence to explicit prenatal care criteria as measured by an evidence-based prenatal care guideline developed by a community panel. "Quality scores" were compared across groups in 4 areas: performance of prenatal screening procedures or tests, visit-based screening, substance use screening, and clinician management of abnormal clinical findings. RESULTS: Patients with Medicaid insurance presented for prenatal care significantly later in pregnancy (14.5 vs 10.5 weeks, P < .01). No significant differences were seen between groups in quality scores for screening tests, clinician management of abnormal clinical findings, visit-based screening, or substance use screening. The overall similarity in quality scores did obscure some significant differences in adherence to individual criteria, particularly in the area of screening tests. Significantly more patients with Medicaid were screened for genital infection (P < .001) and fewer for gestational diabetes (P < .001) or anemia (P < .001) than patients in the other 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with Medicaid presented for prenatal care later in pregnancy and received a different "package" of screening tests than the other 2 groups, there was no overall measurable difference in the quality of prenatal care provided to patients with Medicaid, health maintenance organization, and fee-for-service insurance. Clinicians may have altered screening protocols based on preexisting perceptions of patient risk. Although summary quality measures are a promising tool for comparative research, they provide an incomplete picture of the quality of the prenatal care process and must be interpreted with caution.
Fee-for-Service Plans↗
[State of the art prenatal care from the Swiss viewpoint].
Prenatal care has significantly reduced perinatal and maternal mortality. Screening for maternal disease allows us to reduce or to prevent an unfavourable fetal or obstetrical outcome. Prenatal care should start with a first preconceptional visit. Folic acid intake is recommended for all reproductive-age women who are capable of becoming pregnant. The fetal nuchal translucency measurement has revolutionized prenatal care as a non-invasive, effective screening for chromosomal abnormalities and other diseases of the fetus. Vertical transmission of infections has to be prevented if possible. As an example caesarean section in combination with antiretroviral therapy reduces the transmission of HIV significantly. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases (STD) remains important as at present the incidence of STD is increasing again. In this short review on prenatal care as it is done in Switzerland, we try to enlighten its most important aspects. For the patients and your own benefit as a physician it is important to follow guidelines, although of course each patient has to be treated individually.
Critical Pathways↗
Reduced low birth weight for teenagers receiving prenatal care at a school-based health center: effect of access and comprehensive care.
PURPOSE: To examine and compare access to care, comprehensiveness of care, and birth outcomes for teenagers receiving prenatal care in comprehensive adolescent pregnancy programs (CAPPS) in two different settings: school-based vs. hospital-based. METHODS: Retrospective sohort study using existing data sources: medical records and birth certificates. Using school rosters and hospital clinic databases, we identified pregnant adolescents < or =18 years old who delivered a baby between July 1, 1995 and August 30, 1997 and who received prenatal care in a school-based CAPP (SB-CAPP) or hospital-based CAPP (HB-CAPP). Process of care measures (prenatal care adequacy and comprehensive care) and outcomes (low birth weight) were examined by site of care. Logistic regression models were computed to predict the odds of low birth weight by site of prenatal care, adjusting for prenatal care adequacy, comprehensive care, and possible confounders including baseline maternal characteristics. RESULTS: Three-hundred-ninety eligible teens were identified. Mean age was 15.9 years, 93% were African-American, 84% in school, 13% had a prior birth, and 11% were cigarette smokers. Teens receiving care in the SB-CAPP were significantly younger and more likely to be in school than those in the HB-CAPP. Overall, the two groups had similar low rates of prenatal care adequacy, but compared with teens in the SB-CAPP, those in the HB-CAPP were 1.5 times less likely to receive comprehensive care. Logistic regression analyses adjusting for baseline maternal differences showed that HB-CAPP teens were more than three times as likely to deliver a low birth weight infant compared with SB-CAPP teens (AOR 3.75; 95% CI 1.05-13.36). The increased odds of low birth weight for HB-CAPP teens attenuated when prenatal care was adequate and comprehensive (AOR-HB-CAPP: 2.31, 95% CI 0.65-8.24). CONCLUSIONS: School-based prenatal care was associated with significantly lower odds of low birth weight compared with HB-CAPP care. Although selection bias may be a factor in this observational study, our findings suggest that these improved birth outcomes may be mediated through prenatal care adequacy and provision of comprehensive care.
Adolescent↗
University hospital based care decreases recurrent preterm deliveries and costs in comparison to no prenatal care(1).
Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes and total health care costs for patients with a previous history of preterm delivery cared for by an inner city university hospital house staff clinic versus patients who have not received any prenatal care.Study Design: We conducted a retrospective review of women with a history of preterm delivery between 1994 and 1996. The inclusion criteria was a history of at least one preterm delivery. Data were obtained on maternal demographics, complete past obstetrical history, and number of prenatal visits.Results: The study groups consisted of 96 house staff patients and 53 patients without prenatal care. The number of prior preterm births, incidence of recurrent preterm delivery, length of neonatal intensive care unit stay, and mother-infant costs were greater in the group without prenatal care. The mean gestational age at time of delivery, and mean birth weight were greater in the house staff group.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that university hospital-based prenatal care decreases recurrent preterm delivery rates and health care costs when compared to lack of prenatal care. Prenatal care provided at academic centers, with a coordinated multidisciplinary approach, appears to have a positive impact on the problem of preterm deliveries.
Journal Article↗
Prenatal care in Finland: from primary to tertiary health care?
Traditionally, the Finnish prenatal care system has been based on special maternity centers outside hospitals. In recent years, however, the use of hospital outpatient clinics has increased. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of the clinics and to see whether clinics serve as an addition or as an alternative to maternity centers. We used several different data sources (statistics, documents, interviews, questionnaires). The main source was data on visits for all women who gave birth in Helsinki in a five-week period in 1987. The content of care and means of care delivery differ between clinics and maternity centers. Clinics are technologically and provider-oriented without continuity of care. Clinics are not just referral centers for high-risk mothers; at least half of pregnant women visit them. Ultrasound screening is an important reason for use of the clinic. Background characteristics as well as the outcome of pregnancy were similar among women visiting a hospital clinic a maximum of one time (low users), two to three times, or four times or more (high users). Standardizing for the length of gestation, high users made fewer visits to maternity centers than did low users. Hospital clinic care now seems to replace care in maternity centers, and we found a weak trend toward a pluralistic prenatal care.
Adult↗
Satisfaction and use of prenatal care: their relationship among African-American women in a large managed care organization.
BACKGROUND: Although many more mothers of almost all ethnic groups began prenatal care in the first trimester during the last decade, a significant number of low-income and minority women still fail to obtain adequate care in the United States-a failure that may be related to their dissatisfaction with the prenatal care experience. This study sought to examine the relationship between satisfaction with care and subsequent prenatal care utilization among African-American women using prospective methods. METHODS: A sample of 125 Medicaid and 275 non-Medicaid African-American adult women seeking care through a large Midwest managed care organization were interviewed before or at 28 weeks' gestation at one of two prenatal care sites. Women were interviewed about personal characteristics, prenatal care experience, and ratings of care (satisfaction). Information about subsequent use of prenatal care was obtained through retrospective medical record review after delivery. Univariate and multivariable analyses examining the relationship between women's satisfaction and prenatal care use were conducted using a dichotomous measure of satisfaction and a continuous measure of utilization. RESULTS: Women were highly satisfied with prenatal care, with an overall mean satisfaction score of 80.3. Non-Medicaid women were significantly (p < 0.05) less satisfied with their prenatal care (mean score, 79.1) than Medicaid women (mean score, 82.8), and the latter had significantly fewer visits on average than the former subsequent to the interview. Analyses showed no significant difference in subsequent utilization according to whether a woman had a high versus low level of satisfaction at the prenatal care interview. CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges the assumption that improving a woman's satisfaction with care will lead to an increase in the adequacy of her prenatal care utilization. Since this study was limited to African-American women and is the first prospective study of women's satisfaction with care and prenatal care utilization, the negative findings do not yet settle this area of inquiry. Monitoring women's satisfaction with prenatal care in both managed care and fee-for-service settings and working to improve those aspects of care associated with decreased satisfaction is warranted.
Adolescent↗
[Controversies in preventive health care. II. Preconception and prenatal care].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
Prenatal care evaluation and cohort analyses.
The value of prenatal care has been obscured by multiple factors, including the limitations of birth certificate data, large socioeconomic disparities between women who seek prenatal care and those who do not, and the "preterm delivery bias", ie, the reduced pregnancy duration and opportunity for prenatal care among women who give birth prematurely. Perinatal mortality and morbidity (neonatal intensive care unit admission; ventilator therapy) were carefully assessed in an indigent population (28,838 deliveries at Parkland Memorial Hospital). To avoid the preterm delivery bias, a cohort of all women whose pregnancy reached a specific week of gestation was identified and their prenatal care status (zero vs one or more visits) by that week was related to pregnancy outcome. Separate cohorts were defined at 26, 30, 34, 38, and 42 weeks. Prenatal care was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in only the 34-, 38-, and 42-week cohorts (P less than .01). Findings suggest substantial benefit from prenatal care after 30 weeks' gestation but not from early prenatal care. Unfortunately, it may not be possible to assess prenatal care accurately in observational studies even if cohort analyses are used. Clinical trials are needed to assess the effects of strategies for increasing or improving prenatal care, especially in early pregnancy.
Adolescent↗
Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome.
This study proposes a redesigned measure of prenatal care utilization based on modifications made to a preexisting index of the adequacy of such care. Six prenatal care utilization groups were delineated: intensive, adequate, intermediate, inadequate, no-care, and missing/unknown. Using 430,349 cases from South Carolina and North Carolina vital records from 1978 to 1982 (live birth-infant death cohort files for white resident mothers), this proposed prenatal care utilization measure was examined by maternal sociomedical risk characteristics (age-parity, marital status, education, complications of pregnancy, and previous pregnancy terminations) and by pregnancy outcomes (birth weight, gestational age, and birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality). The intensive prenatal care group had relatively more pregnancy complications but also the most preferred pregnancy outcomes. Appreciable differences in birth weight and gestational age distributions were observed among the prenatal care categories within maternal risk status groups. Increased utilization of prenatal care was associated with higher mean birth weight and gestational age. However, after controlling for maternal risk status, an appreciable variation in birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality was not apparent across prenatal care groups.
Adolescent↗
An evaluation of prenatal care utilization in a military health care setting.
An assessment of prenatal care and birth outcomes was performed for a sample of 7,599 births at a military hospital between 1982 and 1985. Prenatal care patterns were similar to a civilian Health Maintenance Organization study's. Less adequate levels of prenatal care were significantly associated with higher risks of neonatal mortality and low birth weight. Five independent risk factors for receiving less adequate care were identified by multivariate analysis: 1) young maternal age (less than age 20), 2) black race, 3) residence off post, 4) high risk combinations of age and parity, and 5) residence in low-income census tracts.
Female↗
Postnatal care in low-income urban African American women: relationship to level of prenatal care sought.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between level of prenatal care utilization and postnatal patterns of health care behavior among high-risk minority women. The primary hypothesis was that prenatal care utilization predicts subsequent levels of both the maternal and child health services used in the postnatal period. METHODS: The study population consisted of 297 low-income African American women who were recruited at delivery at an urban tertiary medical center in the Mid-Atlantic region. They were followed monthly for 1 year using telephone interviews to determine their use of maternal and child health services. Four levels of prenatal care were identified retrospectively based on reviews of health records and screening interviews using the Kessner Index. Data regarding pregnancy outcomes, maternal postnatal visits, and well-child and acute care child visits were collected. RESULTS: Women who sought inadequate or no prenatal care had greater infant morbidity and mortality in the postnatal period and significantly lower levels of attendance at maternal postnatal visits, well-child visits, immunization completions, and acute care visits. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the level of prenatal care is indicative of the level of postnatal care women seek for themselves and their children in the first year after delivery.
Adolescent↗
Prenatal care services in the public and private arena.
PURPOSE: This exploratory study described the prenatal care experience in the public and private arena from the perceptions of childbearing women using interpretive interactionism. DATA SOURCES: A face-to-face interview comprised of eight open-ended questions was used to obtain pregnant women's perceptions of their prenatal care experience and prenatal care needs. The purposive sample consisted of six women who received private prenatal care and 14 women who received public prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: Five essential elements of the prenatal care experience were identified. Prenatal care was viewed as a cooperative effort between informal self-care and formal care by health professionals. Issues related to individuality and normality were important considerations in the delivery of prenatal care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Controversy exists over the effectiveness of prenatal care in preventing poor outcomes, as the definition of what constitutes adequate prenatal care remains unclear. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) continue to play a pivotal role in the provision of prenatal care services. The expanded knowledge and skills possessed by APNs place them in a pivotal position to develop and implement individualized, developmentally appropriate prenatal care that the women in this study so desperately wanted. In addition, they can assist women in continuing the health promoting behaviors initiated prenatally through out their lifespan.
Adult↗
[Prenatal care in Latin America].
Available data on the coverage of prenatal care in Latin America were reviewed. In recent years, only Bolivia had a coverage of prenatal care of less than 50 per cent. More than 90 per cent of pregnant women received prenatal care in Chile, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico. Prenatal care increased between the 1970 and 1980 in the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and Peru. The coverage of prenatal care decreased in Bolivia and Colombia. The mean number of visits increased in Cuba and Puerto Rico. The increase of prenatal care in Guatemala and Honduras is due to increased care by traditional birth attendants, compared to the role of health care institutions. We compared the more recent data on tetanus immunization of pregnant women to the more recent data on prenatal care. The rates of tetanus immunization are always lower than the rates of prenatal care attendance, except in Costa Rica. The rates of tetanus immunization was less than half as compared to the rates of prenatal care in Bolivia, Guatemala, and Peru. To improve the content of prenatal care should be an objective complementary to the increase of the number of attending women.
Female↗