PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prednisone”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1975

Azathioprine plus prednisone compared with prednisone alone in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Report of a prospective controlled trial in 24 patients.

A prospective, randomized drug trial compared prednisone (60 mg per day initially) to azathioprine (3 to 4 mg/kg of body weight - day initially) plus prednisone in 24 patients with life-threatening systemic lupus erythematosus. Each group contained patients matched for age, sex, disease duration, previous therapy, and clinical and laboratory features of lupus erythematosus. During a mean follow-up period of 18 to 24 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups in number of deaths, renal or extrarenal manifestations of disease, serum complement levels, DNA antibodies, antinuclear antibody titers, lupus erythematosus cells, or Coombs' antibodies. There was no convincing evidence of a steroid-sparing effect of azathioprine. Side effects attributable to steroids were equally common in both groups; infections were not increased in the combination therapy group. Azathioprine was hepatotoxic in doses of 200 mg daily or more. Azathioprine was not a useful adjunct to corticosterolds in short-term therapy of a small number of patients with severe systemic lupus.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[Evaluation of phagocytic activity of peripheral blood neutrophils in patients after kidney transplantation treated with cyclosporin and prednisone or with azathioprine with prednisone].

In 32 renal transplant patients neutrophil phagocytic activity was evaluated using living bacterial cells of Staphylococcus aureus Oxford 209 P strain. The total group of patients was divided into two subgroups according to the kind of the applied immunosuppressive treatment 1) cyclosporin--12 patients treated with cyclosporin A along with prednisone and 2) azathioprine--20 patients treated with azathioprine along with prednisone. The index of phagocytizing cells i.e. the percentage of neutrophils phagocytizing the bacterial cells was assessed in the investigation of phagocytosis. In the renal transplant patients as compared with the control group, statistically significant increase in the phagocytic of peripheral blood neutrophils in relation to the used bacterial cells of Staphylococcus aureus Oxford 209 P strain was found. Statistically significant differences in the investigated range were also present between the compared subgroups. In the cyclosporin subgroup statistically significant increase was revealed in the percentage of phagocytizing neutrophils.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

[Adrenal cortex function in patients after kidney transplantation treated with cyclosporin A with prednisone or Azathioprine with prednisone].

Cortisol and aldosterone secretion following an intravenous injection of 0.25 mg of Synacthen was investigated in 12 patients with renal transplants, treated with azathioprine and prednisone (the "azathioprine group") and in 16 kidney-transplanted patients treated with cyclosporin A and prednisone (the "cyclosporin group"), as well as in 12 healthy control subjects. Statistically significant low cortisol and aldosterone levels under basal conditions was found in both groups of patients with renal transplants as well as a significantly lower reactivity of cortisol secretion and a moderately lower reactivity of aldosterone secretion after Synacthen administration. The protocol of the immunosuppression employed had no effect on the severity of the hormonal abnormalities found.

Adrenal Cortex↗
PubMed1986

Effects of Mega-COMLA (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, vincristine, and methotrexate followed by leucovorin and prednisone) plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in the treatment of lymphoid neoplasms with very poor prognosis.

Treatment results remain very poor for some clinical and histopathologic subsets of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. We treated 21 such patients with a high-dose combination chemotherapy regimen [Mega-COMLA (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, vincristine, and methotrexate followed by leucovorin and prednisone) + CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)] in an attempt to improve disease-free survival. Neoplasms were classified using the Lukes-Collins system. Eight patients had T-cell lymphomas (convoluted lymphocytic lymphoma, four patients; T-cell lymphoma/leukemia, one; and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, three), eight had B-cell lymphomas (immunoblastic sarcoma, five patients; small noncleaved follicular center cell, one; and large noncleaved follicular center cell, two), and five had nontypable large noncleaved cell lymphomas. All patients were previously untreated; 18 of 21 patients had clinical stage III or IV disease. Following induction therapy (4-8 weeks' duration), 16 patients (76%) achieved complete remission, while three had partial remission. Two patients died of sepsis during induction therapy. Eleven of 16 complete responders (69%) remain in complete remission after a median follow-up of 35 months. The actuarial 3-year survival rate is 51% for the entire group. Myelosuppression with this regimen was severe and prolonged, with a median duration of neutropenia (less than 500 cells/microliter) of 14 days. Seven patients (33%) developed severe neuropathy following induction treatment. High-dose induction therapy with this regimen resulted in a high complete remission rate with manageable toxicity. Survival results are encouraging when compared retrospectively to our patients with similar poor-prognosis histologies treated with standard combination chemotherapy. However, the value of this intensive therapy, relative to newer ("third-generation") regimens, can only be established by prospective randomized studies.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1988

A randomized trial comparing chlorambucil plus prednisone vs cyclophosphamide, melphalan, and prednisone in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia stages B and C.

Ninety-six previously untreated patients (67 males/29 females; mean age: 63 years; range: 46-84) with CLL in stage B (62 cases) or C (34 cases) were randomized to be treated with either chlorambucil (0.4 mg/kg orally days 5 and 6) plus prednisone (60 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 4) (CL + PDN) every 2 weeks or cyclophosphamide (160 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 4), melphalan (6 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 4), and prednisone (60 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 4) (CMP) every 3 weeks for 10 months. Forty-eight patients were treated with CLR + PDN, and the remaining 48 with CMP. The following types of response were considered: complete response (CR): total disappearance of symptoms and signs related to the disease. Partial response (PR): shift of the disease to a less advanced stage. Stable disease (SD) no change in the stage after treatment. Progressive disease (PD): progression of the disease to a more advanced stage. Thirty-six (75%) responses (27% CR) with CLR + PDN and 26 (54.5%, 12.5% CR) with CMP were observed (p = 0.054). Although more responses were achieved in stage B (69%, 24% CR) than in stage C (54%, 12% CR) this difference did not achieve statistical significance. Survival was statistically not different for those patients treated with LCR + PDN as compared to those receiving CMP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1986

[New results concerning the effectiveness of therapy of chronic glomerulonephritis. Results of cytostatics-anticoagulants-aggregation inhibitors, cystostatics-anticoagulants-aggregation inhibitors-prednisone and cystostatics-prednisone therapy, derived from a retrospective study].

The indication and effectiveness of the immunosuppressive therapy of chronic glomerulonephritis is now as ever controversial. As a result of a retrospective therapy study in an at least one-year therapy with cytostatics, thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors and anticoagulants (CAA-therapy, n = 27), additional prednisone therapy (CAAP-therapy, n = 95) and cytostatic-prednisone therapy (CP-therapy, n = 33) we find favourable results for the CAA/CAAP-therapy in the nephrotic syndrome and glomerulonephritides with distinct clinical exacerbation also in sclerosations in histology. Clinically inactive nephritides with exclusive urinary findings and sclerosations cannot be influenced therapeutically.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1983

Randomized study for the treatment of adult advanced Hodgkin's disease: mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) versus lomustine, vinblastine, and prednisone.

Forty-seven patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease were entered in a prospective, randomized trial comparing MOPP (mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) with a regimen containing lomustine (CCNU), vinblastine, and prednisone (CCNU-VP). Both groups were comparable for the variables of age, stage, substage (symptoms), histology, prior radiation, and sites of involvement. Seventy-two percent of CCNU-VP-treated patients achieved a pathologically documented complete remission (CR) compared to 41% of the MOPP-treated group. Two additional patients treated with MOPP had remission documented only clinically but have been long-term, disease-free survivors. There was a greater frequency of CR in the patients who had received previous irradiation when compared to patients with no prior irradiation. After a median follow-up of greater than 89 months, there is no statistical difference between the two treatment groups in survival (45% for MOPP and 60% for CCNU-VP). Further, no statistical difference in survival for the two treatment groups was noted when compared by histology, stage, or symptoms. The CCNU-VP combination was better tolerated with significantly less nausea and emesis. The alternative drug regimen of CCNU-VP appears to be as effective as MOPP in producing CR and long-term survival in patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Phase III study of intermittent carmustine (BCNU), cyclophosphamide, and prednisone versus intermittent melphalan and prednisone in myeloma.

A prospective randomized trial in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma was performed comparing carmustine (BCNU), cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (BCP) to melphalan (Alkeran) and prednisone (AP). Induction response rates, remission duration, and survival were similar with both regimens. Hematologic toxicity was greater with AP. Crossover studies in patients who relapsed did not illustrate any significant activity with either drug treatment program. Therefore, BCP can be utilized as initial therapy in myeloma because of comparable remission rates and less hematologic toxicity.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of melphalan and prednisone with vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2479.

BACKGROUND: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performed a Phase III comparison of melphalan and prednisone (MP) with vincristine, carmustine (BCNU), melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP) in an attempt to determine which of these regimens should be the standard treatment for multiple myeloma. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-nine previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma from 23 ECOG institutions were enrolled. Treatment, assigned by randomization, consisted of either 4-week cycles of MP or 5-week cycles of VBCMP. After 1 year of induction therapy, patients received MP or VBMCP maintenance therapy at 6- and 8- week intervals, respectively, until relapse. Patients who experienced treatment failure with MP were eligible for crossover therapy with VBMCP. RESULTS: Objective responses were obtained for 51% of patients receiving MP, as compared with 72% of patients receiving VBMCP (P < 0.001). Response duration was also longer with VBMCP (median, 18 months with MP vs. 24 months with VBMCP; P = 0.007). Overall survival was not significantly different between MP and VBMCP (P = 0.30). The 5-year survival for VBMCP was 26%, as compared with 19% for MP. VBMCP was associated with more nausea, peripheral nerve toxicity, alopecia, and neutropenia, but the infection rate was equal to that observed with MP. Both regimens were generally well tolerated. The main exception was that elderly patients who were confined to bed had a higher risk of death with VBMCP. The two regimens produced a similar incidence of late secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute leukemia. Crossover VBMCP for patients failing with MP was only minimally effective, with an objective response rate of 20% and median survival of 11 months after crossover. CONCLUSIONS: VBMCP is more effective than MP in producing and sustaining remission of multiple myeloma. It is associated with a marginal survival advantage and an apparently greater chance of surviving 5 years for patients who can tolerate moderately intensive combination chemotherapy. Cancer 1997;79:1561-7. 1997 American Cancer Society.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Comparison of four-combination chemotherapy programs in metastatic breast cancer: comparison of multiple drug therapy with cytoxan, 5-FU and prednisone versus cytoxan and adriamycin, versus cytoxan, 5-FU and adriamycin, versus cytoxan, 5-FU and prednisone alternating with cytoxan and adriamycin.

In 126 postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, four chemotherapeutic combination programs were tested. Patients were stratified and randomized to one of the four programs: (1) fluorouracil, cytoxan and prednisone (CFP): (2) fluorouracil, cytoxan and Adriamycin (CAF); (3) cytoxan and Adriamycin (CA); or (4) alternating combinations of CFP-CA. Objective response rates were 17% for 18 patients on CFP, 25% for 40 patients on CAF, 42% for 41 patients on CA and 63% for 19 patients on CFP-CA. CFP-CA provided a significantly higher response rate than either CFP or CAF. The response rate of CA was intermediate. The duration of remission and survival were similar for all four groups. When progression or relapse following remission was demonstrated, patients were rerandomized to either adrenalectomy or tamoxifen. There were no responders either in the 15 patients undergoing adrenalectomy or the 11 patients receiving tamoxifen. In a crossover study, nine adrenalectomized patients received tamoxifen and four tamoxifen-treated patients underwent adrenalectomy. None responded. It appears that response rates to hormonal modalities are reduced in patients previously treated by combination chemotherapy.

Adrenalectomy↗
PubMed1986

Peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone versus melphalan and prednisone as induction therapy in multiple myeloma.

Seventy-five patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma were randomly treated with the association of Peptichemio, Vincristine and prednisone (PTC-VCR-P) or of melphalan and P (MPH-P) for first induction therapy. After induction, all responsive patients received MPH and P until relapse, while unresponsive patients received it until unequivocal evidence of disease progression was observed. A second induction therapy with PTC-VCR-P was then administered, except to patients resistant to this association at first induction (who received combination chemotherapy which included cyclophosphamide and adriamycin). The response rate was 58% in the PTC-VCR-P and 41% in the MPH-P group (P greater than 0.05). The PTC-VCR-P responsive patients experienced a median duration of response shorter than MPH-P responsive patients (20.3 vs 39.7, P = 0.041). Median survival from the start of treatment was 26.2 months in the PTC-VCR-P and 54.1 months in the MPH-P group of patients (P = 0.039). Stage I and II myelomas had the same response rate to PTC-VCR-P and to MPH-P, but their survival was shorter on PTC-VCR-P than on MPH-P (P = 0.014). Stage III myelomas responded more frequently to PTC-VCR-P than to MPH-P (P less than 0.02) and there was a trend to survive longer on PTC-VCR-P than on MPH-P (22.0 vs 12.5 months, P greater than 0.05).

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Some aspects of hemostasis in kidney transplant recipients maintained on cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone in comparison to patients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone.

Cyclosporine (CyA) has been implicated to increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation. Impairment of the fibrinolytic system is one factor involved in the development of thrombotic complications. The aim of this study was to compare hematological and hemostatic parameters among patients on CyA, azathioprine, and prednisone (n = 31) versus CyA and steroids (n = 14). Using commercially available kits we evaluated thrombin activity as thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), prothrombin fragments (1 + 2), thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor-(TAFI), TAFI activator, thrombomodulin (TM)-a marker for endothelial cell injury,-plasmin generation (plasmin-antiplasmin complex PAP), a glycoprotein linking coagulation and fibrinolysis. We observed that patients not treated with azathioprine displayed longer prothrombin times and activated partial thromboplastin times; higher fibrinogen, platelet counts and fibrinolytic activity index (FAI); shorter euglobulin clot lysis time; as well as lower thrombin generation markers namely, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 and thrombin-antithrombin complexes. Although patients in the non-AZA group tended to have been engrafted for a longer time (P =.086), the groups did not differ with regard to age, BMI, erythrocyte count, hematocrit, leukocyte count, creatinine clearance, alanine and asparagine aminotransferase activities mean arterial blood pressure, fibrinogen, TAFI, thrombomodulin, or plasmin-antiplasmin complexes. These findings suggest that kidney transplant recipients on triple therapy are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease than those without azathioprine treatment, despite the lower fibrinolytic activity.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Since 1960, oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) has been regarded as the standard of care in elderly multiple myeloma patients. This multicentre randomised trial compared oral MP plus thalidomide (MPT) with MP alone in patients aged 60-85 years. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomly assigned to receive oral MP for six 4-week cycles plus thalidomide (n=129; 100 mg per day continuously until any sign of relapse or progressive disease) or MP alone (n=126). Analysis was intention-to-treat. This study is registered at , number NCT00232934. RESULTS: Patients treated with thalidomide had higher response rates and longer event-free survival (primary endpoints) than patients who were not. Combined complete or partial response rates were 76.0% for MPT and 47.6% for MP alone (absolute difference 28.3%, 95% CI 16.5-39.1), and the near-complete or complete response rates were 27.9% and 7.2%, respectively. 2-year event-free survival rates were 54% for MPT and 27% for MP (hazard ratio [HR] for MPT 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75, p=0.0006). 3-year survival rates were 80% for MPT and 64% for MP (HR for MPT 0.68, 95% CI 0.38-1.22, p=0.19). Rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 48% in MPT patients and 25% in MP patients (p=0.0002). Introduction of enoxaparin prophylaxis reduced rate of thromboembolism from 20% to 3% (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Oral MPT is an effective first-line treatment for elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Anticoagulant prophylaxis reduces frequency of thrombosis. Longer follow-up is needed to assess effect on overall survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Cladribine with prednisone versus chlorambucil with prednisone as first-line therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: report of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

The efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-CdA) + prednisone (P) versus chlorambucil (Chl) + P were compared in previously untreated patients with progressive or symptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in a randomized, multicenter prospective trial. Eligible patients were assigned to either 2-CdA 0.12 mg/kg per day in 2-hour infusions and P 30 mg/m(2) per day for 5 consecutive days or Chl 12 mg/m(2) per day and P 30 mg/m(2) per day for 7 consecutive days. Three courses were administered at 28-day intervals or longer if myelosuppression developed. The therapy was finished if complete response (CR) was achieved. Of 229 available patients 126 received 2-CdA+P and 103 received Chl+P as a first-line treatment. CR and overall response rates were significantly higher in the patients treated with 2-CdA+P (47% and 87%, respectively) than in the patients treated with Chl+P (12% and 57%, respectively) (P = .001). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the 2-CdA-treated group (P = .01), but event-free survival was not statistically different. Thirteen percent of patients were refractory to 2-CdA+P and 43% to Chl+P (P = .001). Drug-induced neutropenia was more frequently observed during 2-CdA+P (23%) than Chl+P therapy (11%) (P = .02), but thrombocytopenia occurred with similar frequency in both groups (36% and 27%, respectively). Infections were seen more frequently in the 2-CdA+P-treated group (56%) than in the Chl+P-treated group (40%; P = .02). Death rates have so far been similar in patients treated with 2-CdA (20%) and with Chl (17%). The probability of overall survival calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves at 24 months was also similar for both groups (78% and 82%, respectively). (Blood. 2000;96:2723-2729)

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of cladribine plus prednisone with chlorambucil plus prednisone in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Final report of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG CLL1).

BACKGROUND: We previously published an early report of a randomized, multicenter trial on the efficacy and toxicity of cladribine (2-CdA) + prednisone (P) compared with chlorambucil (Chl) + P in previously untreated patients with progressive or symptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Here we present the final report of this study. MATERIAL/METHODS: Of 229 patients, 126 received 2-CdA+P and 103 Chl+P. Patients with no response or progression after three courses or who relapsed earlier than 12 months after completing one treatment were switched to the other. Patients who relapsed later were retreated with the same schedule as before. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were retreated with 2-CdA+P and 19 with Chl+P. Overall response (and complete response) rates were 35% (6%) and 47% (16%), respectively. In 50 patients initially treated with Chl+P and then with 2-CdA+P, complete response (CR) was achieved in 12 (24%) and overall response (OR) in 32 (64%). In 28 patients originally treated with 2-CdA+P and then with Chl+P, CR in 1 (3%, p=0.01) and OR in 6 (21%, p=0.003) were obtained. We found no statistically significant difference in overall survival time in patients treated initially with 2-CdA+P and Chl+P aged 60 years (4.63 and 5.27 years, respectively, p=0.45), 60-70 years (3.29 and 3.14 years, p=0.79), and >70 years (1.53 and 1.93 years, p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: 2-CdA+P is significantly more effective as a second-line treatment and re-treatment than Chl+P. However, we found a trend to longer survival in elderly patients treated with Chl+P.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Cytostatic treatment of glomerular diseases. V. Treatment of glomerulonephritis with cyclophosphamide plus prednisone, azathioprine plus prednisone and cyclophosphamide as monotherapy. A comparative study. A report from a Copenhagen Study Group of Renal Diseases.

Thirty-two patients suffering from biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis with proteinuria greater than or equal to 1.2 g/24 hours and/or creatinine clearance less than 50% of normal value were treated for 6 weeks with prednisone plus cyclophosphamide (C+P), azathioprine (A+P) or cyclophosphamide as a monotherapy (C). The effect of the treatment was evaluated after 6 and 16 weeks. The results were entered consecutively in a sequential analysis. The three treatment regimes were compared mutually as well as with the results of 16 weeks' treatment with C and placebo, published previously. Six weeks' treatment with C+P or A+P was superior to C and at least as efficient as 16 weeks' C treatment. C treatment for 6 weeks was less efficient than 16 weeks' C treatment. The side-effects of the 6 weeks' A+P or C+P treatment were fewer and less serious than those reported from the long-term C treatment.

Adult↗