SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “REINFORCEMENT”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1974

Effects of reinforcement rate and reinforcer magnitude on choice behavior of humans.

Two experiments with human subjects investigated the effects of rate of reinforcement and reinforcer magnitude upon choice. In Experiment 1, each of five subjects responded on four concurrent variable-interval schedules. In contrast to previous studies using non-human organisms, relative response rate did not closely match relative rate of reinforcement. Discrepancies ranged from 0.03 to 0.43 (mean equal to 0.19). Similar discrepancies were found between relative amount of time spent responding on each schedule and the corresponding relative rates of reinforcement. In Experiment 2, in which reinforcer magnitude was varied for each of five subjects, similar discrepancies ranging from 0.05 to 0.50 (mean equal to 0.21), were found between relative response rate and relative proportion of reinforcers received. In both experiments, changeover rates were lower on the long-interval concurrent schedules than on the short-interval ones. The results suggest that simple application of previous generalizations regarding the effects of reinforcement rate and reinforcer magnitude on choice for variable-interval schedules does not accurately describe human behavior in a simple laboratory situation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1976

Elicited responding to signals for reinforcement: the effects of overall versus local changes in reinforcement probability.

Pigeons were studied on a three-component multiple schedule where all reinforcement was independent of responding. Two components were cued by different keylights and were associated with different rates of reinforcement. The third was always a no-key period associated with extinction. After a few sessions, pecking was elicited by the keylights signalling the reinforcement and continued to be maintained indefinitely. The duration and sequence of the three components were varied to determine if the primary controlling variable was differences in the overall probability of reinforcement, or if it was the immediate change in reinforcement signalled by the onset and/or offset of the stimulus. Both variables were found to control behavior. When 30-sec components were used, the primary controlling variable was the overall probability of reinforcement, but when 3-min components were used, overall probability had little effect. Control by local changes in reinforcement also occurred, although the type of local control varied both across subjects and experimental conditions. Some behaviors were controlled more by the change in reinforcement signalled by the onset of the stimulus, while others were controlled more by the change signalled by the offset of the stimulus.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1992

Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: assessing task interspersal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children.

Task interspersal procedures have been quite effective in increasing autistic children's motivation to learn. These procedures have typically demonstrated that the inclusion of reinforced maintenance tasks (previously learned tasks) increases responding to new acquisition tasks because more reinforcers, in general, are available. However, studies have not specifically addressed the effects of various schedules of reinforcement, used in conjunction with task interspersal procedures, upon response acquisition. In the present study, a multiple baseline design across subjects was used to assess different reinforcement schedules. Five autistic children participated in learning sessions, during which trials of an acquisition task were interspersed with trials of three maintenance tasks. Correct responses to acquisition tasks were continuously reinforced throughout all conditions, while the reinforcement schedule for competent performance of maintenance tasks differed systematically. Results indicated that all children learned the new tasks when food reinforcers were presented only for acquisition tasks. Results are discussed in terms of behavioral contrast and improving the effectiveness of motivation-enhancing procedures for autistic children.

Attention↗

PubMed2003

Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement.

RATIONALE: Current conceptualizations of drug reinforcement assume that drug-taking behavior is a consequence of the contingent, temporal relationship between the behavior and drug reward. However, stimulant drugs also potentiate the rewarding effects of other reinforcers when administered noncontingently. OBJECTIVES: These studies were designed to determine whether noncontingent nicotine enhances the reinforcing properties of a nonpharmacological reinforcer and whether this direct effect facilitates operant behavior within the context of a nicotine self-administration procedure. METHODS: Rats self-administered nicotine or food, or received noncontingent nicotine, saline, or food either with or without a response-contingent, unconditioned reinforcing visual stimulus (VS). RESULTS: Noncontingent nicotine, whether delivered as discrete injections based on a pattern of self-administered nicotine or as a continuous infusion, increased response rates maintained by the VS. There were no significant differences in responding by animals that received contingent compared with noncontingent nicotine when a VS was available. This increase was not observed in the absence of the VS or as a consequence of noncontingent food delivery. Operant behavior was equally attenuated and reinstated by the removal and subsequent replacement of contingent and noncontingent nicotine. Nicotine supported self-administration in the absence of response-contingent, nicotine-paired stimuli; however, response rates were drastically reduced compared with nicotine self-administration with the VS. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine influences operant behavior in two ways: by acting as a primary reinforcer when it is contingent upon behavior, and by directly potentiating the reinforcing properties of other stimuli through a nonassociative mechanism. Nicotine self-administration and smoking may be largely dependent upon this later action.

Animals↗

PubMed1986

A partial reinforcement extinction effect in water-reinforced rats intermittently treated with haloperidol.

Thirsty rats were trained to traverse a straight runway for 30 sec access to water reinforcement. The experiment consisted of daily single trials during a 30-day reinforcement phase followed by 21 days of extinction. Animals that experienced no water reward on 33% of the reinforcement trials subsequently demonstrated an increased resistance to extinction of the runway response compared to continuously reinforced (CRF) animals. This "partial reinforcement extinction effect" (PREE) was also observed in CRF animals pretreated with the neuroleptic drug haloperidol (0.075 or 0.15 mg/kg) on 33% of the reinforcement trials. Thus, periodic dopamine receptor antagonism produced behavioral results comparable to those produced by periodic reward omission. These data cannot easily be accounted for by some form of general drug-induced performance deficit since the extinction trials were conducted in undrugged animals. It was concluded that dopaminergic substrates may play a role in mediating the behavioral effects of water reinforcement.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

The economic context of drug and non-drug reinforcers affects acquisition and maintenance of drug-reinforced behavior and withdrawal effects.

The focus of this review is to examine the effect of non-drug alternative reinforcers on drug-reinforced behavior. An increasing number of animal laboratory as well as human clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of non-drug reinforcers in reducing steady-state levels of drug self-administration. One goal of this review was to determine what behavioral economic conditions are optimal for reducing drug-reinforced behavior. Variables such as price of the drug and non-drug reinforcer have been manipulated by changing fixed-ratio (FR) value of these commodities. Income has been changed by limiting the amount of access to the commodities or by changing session length. Substitution was evaluated by determining whether decreased demand for a drug (due to increased price) was related to increased demand for a non-drug reinforcer. A second goal of this review was to investigate transition states in the drug addiction process with respect to the role of alternative non-drug reinforcers. Animal models of acquisition and withdrawal were examined to identify behavioral economic conditions under which acquisition may be prevented or withdrawal effects (and potential for relapse) may be alleviated.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

L-methamphetamine and selective MAO inhibitors decrease morphine-reinforced and non-reinforced behavior in rats; Insights towards selegiline's mechanism of action.

Selegiline is an inhibitor of type B monoamine oxidase (MAO) with psychostimulant effects that can decrease morphine-reinforced and non-reinforced responding. The present study was undertaken to compare the effects of MAO inhibition and treatment with L-methamphetamine, the major psychostimulant metabolite of selegiline, on these behaviors. After rats acquired a stable pattern of morphine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule, chronic treatment was initiated with vehicle, L-methamphetamine, clorgyline (a selective inhibitor of MAO-A), or rasagiline (a selective inhibitor of MAO-B); with both MAO inhibitors administered at a dose selective for one MAO isoform and a higher dose that inhibited both isoforms. Rats were evaluated for up to four cycles of opiate dependence maintained by morphine self-administration and withdrawal during which extinction responding was recorded. Most behavioral measures (92.4%) did not differ in animals evaluated during an initial and subsequent cycles of dependence and withdrawal. All active treatments attenuated non-reinforced responding during extinction. Morphine reinforcement was also decreased by each of the three active treatments, but greater and more prolonged effects were observed following inhibition of MAO-B with rasagiline. Responding during either cue- or morphine-induced reinstatement was attenuated by either clorgyline or rasagiline administered at nonselective doses, but not by either compound administered at selective dose levels. Treatment with L-methamphetamine did not produce significant effects on cue-induced reinstatement, but decreased non-reinforced responding during morphine-induced reinstatement. These findings indicate that morphine reinforcement and different non-reinforced behaviors differ greatly in their susceptibility to modification by psychostimulant treatment or MAO inhibition.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.

The results of functional analyses suggested that the destructive behavior of two individuals was sensitive to escape and attention as reinforcement. In an instructional context, we evaluated the effects of reinforcing compliance with functional reinforcers when destructive behavior produced a break. For one participant we also evaluated the effects of reinforcing compliance with functional reinforcers when destructive behavior produced no differential consequence (escape extinction). We hypothesized that destructive behavior failed to decrease in an instructional context when compliance resulted in a break because presentation of a break evoked attention-maintained destructive behavior. The results of a reinforcer assessment supported this hypothesis by demonstrating that demands functioned as positive reinforcement when no alternative activities were available. These results are discussed in terms of the importance of establishing operations in determining the appetitive or aversive properties of stimuli when destructive behavior is multiply controlled.

Aggression↗

PubMed2003

Development and validation of a self-rating scale for positive- and negative-reinforcement smoking: The Michigan Nicotine Reinforcement Questionnaire.

Positive- and negative-reinforcement consequences of smoking were assessed using a self-report inventory. Data from 429 current smokers (348 women, 81 men) were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis, with concurrent validation of resulting scales in 288 current smokers (235 women, 53 men), controlling for sex and age. The solution with three factors--positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, and smoking patterns--provided the clearest and most interpretable factor solution. The Michigan Nicotine Reinforcement Questionnaire (M-NRQ), which yields positive- and negative-reinforcement scales, was developed based on these results. Positive-reinforcement smoking was associated with higher scores on novelty seeking, reward dependence, alcohol dependence, and pleasurable sensations upon early smoking experimentation, and with lower scores on displeasurable sensations and nausea upon early smoking experimentation. Negative-reinforcement smoking was associated with higher scores for nicotine dependence, depression, anxiety, and harm avoidance. The M-NRQ has potential as a diagnostic tool for individualizing behavioral intervention and pharmacotherapy and also may be useful in identifying new phenotypes for genetic research on smoking.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior.

Research has shown that noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) can be an effective behavior-reduction procedure when based on a functional analysis. The effects of NCR may be a result of elimination of the contingency between aberrant behavior and reinforcing consequences (extinction) or frequent and free access to reinforcers that may reduce the participant's motivation to engage in aberrant behaviors or mands. If motivation is momentarily reduced, behavior such as mands may not be sensitive to positive reinforcement. In this study, for 3 children with aberrant behavior maintained by tangible positive reinforcement, differential-reinforcement-of-alternative-behavior schedules were superimposed on NCR schedules to determine if mands could be strengthened. Results for the participants indicated that NCR did not preclude reinforcement of mands.

Autistic Disorder↗

PubMed1976

From heroin to methadone--social role changes and reinforcement differentials in relation to outcome on methadone. Part I. The study of reinforcement differentials.

This study examines the relevance of reinforcements available to the addict in five critical stages of his career to his success on methadone maintenance. In-depth focused interviews were held with 30 addicts who had completed a program of methadone induction and who were characterized by social worker's evaluations as Successful, Marginally Adjusted, or Failures. The Successful group showed a higher initial negative reinforcement followed by higher positive reinforcement on methadone. The Moderately Successful group showed more negative reinforcement before treatment but continued to show negative reinforcements afterwards. The Failures were low on negative reinforcements earlier but negative reinforcements were high after treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

[Learning and resistance to extinction in external-self dual reinforcement as compared with those in external reinforcement].

Learning and resistance to extinction in external-self dual reinforcement (ESR) were compared with those in external reinforcement (ER). delta ESR (delta: extinction process) was also compared with the corresponding process of other two conditions; 1) discontinuation of self reinforcement after external-self dual reinforcement (delta SR), 2) discontinuation of external reinforcement following the dual reinforcement (delta ER). Undergraduates (n = 58 in Experiment I, n = 74 in Experiment II) were randomly assigned to one of the four conditions. Subjects were given association learning in Exp. I and memory task in Exp. II, respectively. Those who responded successfully were then shifted to extinction session for testing. Effects of ESR on learning were same as those of ER in the two experiments. Resistance to extinction in Exp. I was significantly higher for delta SR and delta ESR as compared with delta ER and *ER (extinction switched from external reinforcement). Resistance for delta SR in Exp. II was significantly higher than for the remaining conditions. Based on these findings, high level of the resistance for delta ESR was discussed by attributing it to the internalization of ESR.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Ethanol-reinforced behavior in P, NP, HAD and LAD rats: differential genetic regulation of reinforcement and motivation.

Genetic differences exist in whether animals find ethanol or other drugs positively reinforcing. Through the use of P, NP, HAD and LAD rats, animals selectively bred for high (P, HAD) or low (NP, LAD) ethanol consumption in a two-bottle choice procedure, the present results show that multiple factors determining ethanol consumption can be identified. Ethanol-preferring P rats consumed more ethanol across all conditions involving fixed ratio or progressive schedules than did non-preferring NP, preferring HAD or non-preferring LAD rats. In both non-preferring NP and preferring HAD rats, responding decreased similarly as fixed ratio size was increased. However, under a progressive ratio schedule, NP rats responded to higher break points than did HAD rats. In LAD rats, ethanol has not consistently been shown to be a reinforcer and these rats exhibited the lowest levels of responding for ethanol across all conditions. These findings extend the conditions under which P rats have been shown to consume substantial amounts of ethanol. In addition the results illustrate genetic differences with regard to the propensity of animals to maintain ethanol-reinforced behaviors under different schedules of intermittent reinforcement, and provide further evidence that ethanol drinking in a preference paradigm is not highly predictive of whether or to what extent ethanol may come to serve as a positive reinforcer. The results suggest that the phenomenon of ethanol drinking is a composite of at least three genetically independent factors governing different aspects of ethanol-seeking behavior: (1) a permissive factor allowing animals to readily overcome the aversive sensory effects of ethanol; (2) a reinforcement factor that determines whether a substance can come to serve as a positive reinforcer; and (3) a motivational factor related to the subjects' drive state with regard to drug seeking.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1995

The paradox of preference for unreliable reinforcement: The role of context and conditioned reinforcement.

We discuss Belke and Spetch's (1994) work on choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement. The studies by Belke and Spetch extend a line of basic research demonstrating that under certain experimental conditions in a concurrent chains procedure, pigeons prefer an alternative that produces unreliable reinforcement. The authors describe the variables that influence preference for unreliable reinforcement, including the signaling and the duration of the reinforcement schedules, the context in which the signaling stimuli occur, and the effects of conditioned reinforcement. Hypothetical applied examples that address these variables are provided, and their influence on preference for unreliable reinforcement in humans is discussed. We conclude by suggesting a line of applied research to examine the relationship between these variables and a preference for unreliable reinforcement.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1968

Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Reinforcements were arranged independently of the pigeon's behavior by concurrent variable-interval schedules. The reinforcements arranged by one of the schedules occurred when the chamber was illuminated with amber light, and the reinforcements arranged by the other schedule occurred when the chamber was illuminated with blue light. Both schedules functioned concurrently, but reinforcers were delivered by each only in the presence of the appropriate stimulus condition. A response on a white key, the only key in the chamber, alternated the stimulus condition and the effective schedule. The results of this procedure were similar to those obtained with concurrent response-dependent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. The proportion of the total session time spent in the presence of a schedule component approximated the proportion of the total number of reinforcements in the component. Changeover rate was a decreasing function of the changeover delay and of the difference between the relative rates of reinforcement for each pair of concurrent schedules.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1969

Effects of reinforcement magnitude on pigeons' preference for different fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

In concurrent, two-member chains, the completion of one or the other of two initial percentage fixed-interval 90-sec links produced a terminal link in which the completion of a fixed ratio produced food reinforcement. The fixed ratios and the duration of reinforcement in the terminal links were varied. Relative response rate in initial links was proportional to the relative reinforcement duration per ratio response (reinforcement duration divided by fixed ratio) in terminal links. The rate of responding in the terminal fixed-ratio links was insensitive to both ratio size and reinforcement duration and therefore did not vary sufficiently to distinguish between responses per reinforcement and immediacy of reinforcement as controlling variables in terminal links.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1970

Interresponse time duration in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: control by ordinal position and time since reinforcement.

The times between each of the first thirteen responses after reinforcement (the first twelve interresponse times) were determined for two pigeons whose pecking was reinforced on fixed-interval schedules of food reinforcement ranging from 0.5 min to 5 min. These interresponse times were classified with respect to their ordinal position in the sequence of responses and with respect to the time since the preceding reinforcement at which the initiating response occurred. The median interresponse time durations were essentially constant after the sixth response after reinforcement regardless of the time at which the interresponse time was initiated. The durations of the first few interresponse times after reinforcement decreased as the number of preceding responses increased and as the time since the preceding reinforcement increased.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1973

The effect upon simple animal behavior of different frequencies of reinforcement, Part II: separate control of the reinforcement of different IRTs.

Rats' responding was stabilized for over 35 days on 4-min variable-interval reinforcement. Reinforcements per hour for 4-sec wide classes of interresponse times were then separately controlled by adjusting those for each class to the variable-interval values that had just prevailed. This produced little or no change in interresponse times, indicating that the new procedure was substantially equivalent to a variable-interval schedule. The variable-interval schedule produced a high and stable conditional probability of interresponse times in the 0- to 4-sec class, associated with a peak in reinforcements per hour for this class. Reducing the reinforcements per hour for this class while raising that for another class (by 3.3 reinforcements per hour) significantly reduced the conditional probability of 0- to 4-sec interresponse times. Restoring the 3.3 reinforcements per hour to the 0- to 4-sec class significantly elevated the conditional probability of interresponse times in this class. Hence, it is concluded that the distribution of interresponse times produced by a subject during some variable-interval schedules is determined partly by the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times that the variable-interval schedule provided.Reprinted from Part II of the Final Report of Research under Contract DA-49-007-MD-408 with the Medical Research and Development Board, Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, 31 December 1954. Edwin B. Newman, Responsible Investigator; Douglas Anger, Research Assistant and author of report. Experimental work done in the Psychological Laboratories of Harvard University.

Journal Article↗