PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ROOT CANAL OBTURATION”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Root surface temperature rises in vitro during root canal obturation using hybrid and microseal techniques.

The aim of this in vitro study was to measure the temperature rise on the outer surface of roots during filling with hybrid technique and Microseal. Twenty extracted human maxillary and mandibular premolars with a single canal were randomly divided into two groups of 10 teeth each. In the first group, the teeth were filled with hybrid technique (thermomechanical compaction with Engine Plugger used following lateral condensation of the apical part of the canal), the second group was filled using Microseal. After root canal obturation the filling material was removed and the obturation procedure was repeated. A total of 20 obturations in each group were performed. Temperature changes were measured using a thermal imaging camera. The temperature of certain regions of the mesial surface was analyzed and the highest temperature values were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The mean increase of temperature during the hybrid technique with Engine Plugger was 23.8 degrees C, while during Microseal it was significantly lower (p = 0.000001) at 5.5 degrees C. The temperature rise generated by Microseal was below the critical level and should not damage supporting structures, however, the hybrid technique generated a relatively high temperature rise that may cause periodontal tissue damage.

Bicuspid↗
PubMed2000

Sealer distribution in root canals obturated by three techniques.

AIM: The aim of this study was to observe sealer distribution in root canals filled by different root filling techniques. METHODOLOGY: AH26 (0.05 mL) dyed with carbon black powder was placed into the prepared root canals of maxillary central incisors using a lentulo spiral. Thereafter the canals were obturated using three different gutta-percha root-filling techniques. Horizontal sections were cut in the apical and middle portions of the filled canals. Images of the cross sections were scanned and the percentage of sealer coated canal perimeter (PSCP) was measured using a computer digital imaging system. RESULTS: At 3 mm from the apex, the PSCP after lateral condensation was similar to that after vertical condensation (P > 0.05). At 6 mm from the apex, however, the PSCP was significantly higher after lateral condensation than after vertical condensation (P < 0.05). At both levels the PSCP was significantly higher after single cone (no condensation) than after the other two condensation techniques (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Sealer may be removed from the canal wall by the condensation procedures.

Bismuth↗
PubMed2005

[The influence of smear layer and different sealers on apical microleakage of root canals obturated with Ultrafil-3D system].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sealing properties of Ultrafil-3D system with three different root canal sealers in absence or presence of smear layer. METHODS: 64 straight single-root anterior teeth were selected and root canals were instrumented. 60 teeth were divided into two groups with or without smear layer. Each group was then divided into three subgroups, three different sealers (AH-plus, Roekoseal, CRCS) were applied in each subgroup when the root canals were obturated with Ultrafil-3D system (using Firm set gutta-percha). Other 4 teeth were used as control. After dyed in 2% methyl blue for 5 days, all teeth were longitudinally split from mesiodistal surface into two parts. The linear length of dye was measured for apical microleakage. SAS6.04 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: (1) The linear dye penetration was significantly higher in group A (CRCS) compared with that in group B (AH-plus) and in group C (Roekoseal) (P<0.05). (2) Whether the smear layer was absent or present, the apical microleakage had no significant difference when using gutta-percha of Ultrafil-3D system with the same sealer (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Root-canal obturation with Ultrafil-3D gutta-percha can obtain better sealing ability when AH-plus or Roekoseal is applied as sealer. Removing the smear layer can not significantly reduce the apical microleakage.

Dental Leakage↗
PubMed1989

Periodontal tissue reactions following root canal obturation with an injection-thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique.

The thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation technique is a relatively recent development in endodontics. In this study we evaluated the possible effects of heat transmitted to the periodontal tissues when the Obtura root canal filling device was used in dog teeth. Two 8-month-old beagle dogs were used; 56 root canals of 36 teeth (maxillary incisors and first, second and third premolars of both jaws) were divided into two groups. In Group A 26 root canals were obturated with the lateral condensation technique, while in Group B 30 root canals were obturated using the Obtura device, without sealer. Observation periods were 1, 3, 7, 28 and 56 days. After routine laboratory procedures, hematoxylin-eosin stained sections were examined under a light microscope. In this experimental model the thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation technique caused a periapical inflammatory reaction at all observation periods. Inflammatory reaction and destruction of collagen fibers were localized in the area around the apical delta, while the alveolar founding bone, the roots of the teeth and the periodontal ligament at the side of the root surfaces remained normal.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy of retreatment techniques for a resin-based root canal obturation material.

Resilon/Epiphany obturation system is emerging as an alternative to gutta-percha (GP). The efficacy of retreatment techniques for Resilon removal has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two commonly used retreatment techniques in the removal of Resilon. Sixty single-canal teeth were instrumented and obturated with either Resilon/Epiphany or GP/AH Plus. Each canal was randomly allocated to receive one of the two retreatment techniques-ProFile 0.06 rotary files combined with heat or chloroform. The time required to remove the obturation material was recorded and the cleanliness of canal walls was determined by stereomicroscope and electron microscopy. The results demonstrated that chloroform combined with rotary files was more efficient in material removal compared to heat (p < 0.05). Resilon was faster to remove than GP. Both techniques resulted in cleaner canal walls in the apical third of the teeth obturated with Resilon when compared to GP (p < 0.05).

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2002

In vivo performance of the new non-instrumentation technology (NIT) for root canal obturation.

AIM: The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the radiographic quality of root fillings performed by the NIT-obturation method versus conventional mechanical obturation. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-six patients needing root canal treatment participated in this study. The treatments were performed by three private practitioners. The root canals were instrumented with K-Flexofiles to a master apical file between sizes 25 and 60, followed by step-back flaring up to size 70. Copious irrigation was used throughout the instrumentation procedure with NaOCl (3%). The teeth were obturated either by lateral condensation, the McSpadden technique (control) or by the new non-instrumentation technology (NIT) with and without using gutta-percha points. In the NIT method, a low pressure was created within the tooth, and AH 26 sealer was sucked into the root canal system. Radiographs of the root-filled teeth were analysed and the length of the root filling, the presence of voids and the area of any other fillings determined. RESULTS: The root canal fillings of the control group (0.1 +/- 0.1 mm) and those of the NIT/gutta-percha group (0.3 +/- 0.1 mm) were both overextended when taking the apical constriction as a reference point. Root canal fillings of the NIT/gutta-percha group were statistically (P < 0.05) significantly longer than those of the NIT without gutta-percha group. The latter showed slightly underextended root canal fillings (-0.14 +/- 0.1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The present investigation demonstrated the performance of the NIT-obturation method in vivo. Root canals filled by the reduced-pressure-method using sealer combined with gutta-percha cones exhibited equivalent radiographic quality compared to conventionally filled canals.

Analysis of Variance↗