PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Signaling”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins indirectly regulate toll-like receptor signaling in innate immune cells.

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins constitute a class of negative regulators for Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathways. These intracellular proteins are induced by cytokine signaling, but they can also be induced by stimulation of Toll-like receptors (TLR). It has even been suggested that SOCS proteins are important negative regulators of TLR signaling. Here we have elucidated the nature of the regulatory role of SOCS in TLR signaling. Induction of SOCS-3 and cytokine-inducible Src homology 2-containing protein (CIS) by TLR stimulation was strictly dependent on MyD88 but showed differing needs in case of SOCS-1. However, induction of SOCS proteins by TLR ligands was independent of type I interferon. In macrophages overexpressing SOCS, we were not able to observe an inhibitory effect of SOCS-1, SOCS-2, SOCS-3, or CIS on prototypical TLR target genes such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha. However, we found that TLR-2, TLR-3, TLR-4, and TLR-9 stimulation induced interferon-beta (IFN-beta), which is able to exert auto- and paracrine signaling, leading to the activation of secondary genes like IP-10. SOCS-1 and, to a lesser extent, SOCS-3 and CIS were able to inhibit this indirect signaling pathway following TLR stimulation, whereas neither MAP kinase nor NF kappa B signaling were affected. However, STAT-1 tyrosine phosphorylation following TLR triggering was severely impaired by SOCS-1 overexpression. Thus, our data suggest that SOCS proteins induced by TLR stimulation limit the extent of TLR signaling by inhibiting type I IFN signaling but not the main NF kappa B pathway.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Factors influencing the formation of modified S2 EPR signal and the S3 EPR signal in Ca(2+)-depleted photosystem II.

NaCl/EGTA-washing of photosystem II (PS-II) results in the removal of Ca2+ and the inhibition of oxygen evolution. Two new EPR signals were observed in such samples: a stable and modified S2 multiline signal and an S3 signal [(1989) Biochemistry 28, 8984-8989]. Here, we report what factors are responsible for the modifications of the S2 signal and the observation of the S3 signal. The following results were obtained. (i) The stable, modified, S2 multiline signal can be induced by the addition of high concentrations of EGTA or citrate to PS-II membranes which are already inhibited by Ca(2+)-depletion. (ii) The carboxylic acids act in the S3-state, are much less effective in S2 and have no effect in the S1-state. (iii) The extrinsic polypeptides (17- and 23-kDa) are not required to observe either the modified S2 signal or the S3 signal. However, they do influence the splitting and the lifetime of the S3 signal, and they seem to have a slight influence on the hyperfine pattern of the S2 signal. (iv) The S3 signal can be observed in Ca(2+)-depleted PS-II which does not exhibit the modified multiline signal. Then, it is proposed that formation of histidine radical during the S2 to S3 transition in Ca(2+)-depleted PS-II [(1990) Nature 347, 303-306] also occurs in functional PS-II.

Calcium↗

A dual-channel signal averager for spontaneous signals.

This signal averager has been developed for spontaneous transients of tension and of aequorin bioluminescence in skinned cardiac cells. The signal with the largest signal-to-noise ratio (generally the tension transient) is entered in Channel 1 and triggers the system. Then the averager will unmask the signal entered in Channel 2 if it was buried in the noise during the direct recording. This signal averager uses an inexpensive microcomputer and a program written in Assembly Language. To facilitate its use, the averager is remotely controlled by a potentiometer for the adjustment of the threshold voltage above which the signal in Channel 1 will be collected and by three push buttons for starting the data collection, for averaging and displaying the results, and for resetting the system. The display is purely analog on the recorder, including averaged signals and interval for the signals in both channels together with a graphical representation of the standard deviations and of the number of observations. This signal averager could be used for any preparations developing spontaneous signals with variable intervals, provided that at least one of the synchronous signals has a large enough signal-to-noise ratio to trigger the system.

Action Potentials↗

IL-6 signal transduction and its physiological roles: the signal orchestration model.

Interleukin (IL)-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that not only affects the immune system, but also acts in other biological systems and many physiological events in various organs. In a target cell, IL-6 can simultaneously generate functionally distinct or sometimes contradictory signals through its receptor complex, IL-6Ralpha and gp130. One good illustration is derived from the in vitro observations that IL-6 promotes the growth arrest and differentiation of M1 cells through gp130-mediated STAT3 activation, whereas the Y759/SHP-2-mediated cascade by gp130 stimulation has growth-enhancing effects. The final physiological output can be thought of as a consequence of the orchestration of the diverse signaling pathways generated by a given ligand. This concept, the signal orchestration model, may explain how IL-6 can elicit proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects, depending on the in vivo environmental circumstances. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying this issue is a challenging subject for future research. Intriguingly, recent in vivo studies indicated that the SHP-2-binding site- and YXXQ-mediated pathways through gp130 are not mutually exclusive but affect each other: a mutation at the SHP-2-binding site prolongs STAT3 activation, and a loss of STAT activation by gp130 truncation leads to sustained SHP-2/ERK MAPK phosphorylation. Although IL-6/gp130 signaling is a promising target for drug discovery for many human diseases, the interdependence of each signaling pathway may be an obstacle to the development of a nonpeptide orally active small molecule to inhibit one of these IL-6 signaling cascades, because it would disturb the signal orchestration. In mice, a consequence of the imbalanced signals causes unexpected results such as gastrointestinal disorders, autoimmune diseases, and/or chronic inflammatory proliferative diseases. However, lessons learned from IL-6 KO mice indicate that IL-6 is not essential for vital biological processes, but a significant impact on disease progression in many experimental models for human disorders. Thus, IL-6/gp130 signaling will become a more attractive therapeutic target for human inflammatory diseases when a better understanding of IL-6 signaling, including the identification of the conductor for gp130 signal transduction, is achieved.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗

Parallel effects of signal peptide hydrophobic core modifications on co-translational translocation and post-translational cleavage by purified signal peptidase.

The length of the hydrophobic core of the bovine parathyroid hormone signal peptide was modified by in vitro mutagenesis. Extension of the hydrophobic core by three amino acids at the NH2-terminal end had little effect on the proteolytic processing of the signal peptide by microsomal membranes. Deletion of 6 of the 12 amino acids in the core eliminated translocation and processing of the modified protein. Deletion of pairs of amino acids across the core resulted in position-dependent inhibition of signal activity unrelated to hydrophobicity but inversely related to the hydrophobic moments of the modified cores. Deletions in the NH2-terminal region of the core were strongly inhibitory for proteolytic processing whereas deletions in the COOH-terminal region had no effect or increased processing when assessed either co-translationally with microsomal membranes or post-translationally with purified hen oviduct signal peptidase. Deletion of cysteine 18 and alanine 19 increased processing, but deletion of cysteine alone or substitution of leucine for cysteine did not increase processing more than deletion of both residues at 18 and 19. Translations of the translocation-defective mutants with pairs of amino acids deleted in a wheat germ system were inhibited by addition of exogenous signal recognition particle suggesting that interactions of the modified signal peptides with signal recognition particle were normal. The position-dependent effects of the hydrophobic core modifications indicate that structural properties of the core in addition to hydrophobicity are important for signal activity. The parallel effects of the modifications on co-translational translocation and post-translational processing by purified signal peptidase suggest that proteins in the signal peptidase complex might be part of, or intimately associated with, membrane proteins involved in the translocation. A model is proposed in which the NH2-terminal region of the hydrophobic core binds to one subunit of the signal peptidase while the other subunit catalyzes the cleavage.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Re-examination of the role of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) in the regulation of toll-like receptor signaling.

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) is an obligate negative regulator of cytokine signaling and most importantly in vivo, signaling via the interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) receptor. SOCS1, via its Src homology 2 domain, binds to phosphotyrosine residues in its targets, reducing the amplitude of signaling from cytokine receptors. SOCS1 is also implicated in blocking Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling in macrophages activated by TLR agonists such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), thus regulating multiple steps in the activation of innate immune responses. To rigorously test this, we isolated macrophages from Socs1-/- mice on multiple genetic backgrounds. We found no evidence that SOCS1 blocked TLR-activated pathways, endotoxin tolerance, or nitric oxide production. However, Socs1-/-;IFN-gamma-/- mice were extremely susceptible to LPS challenge, confirming previous findings. Because LPS induces IFN-beta production from macrophages, we tested whether SOCS1 regulates IFN-alpha/beta receptor signaling. We find that SOCS1 is required to inhibit IFN-alpha/beta receptor signaling in vitro. Furthermore, the absence of a single allele encoding TYK2, a JAK (Janus kinase) family member essential IFN-alpha/beta receptor signaling, rescued Socs1-/- mice from early lethality, even in the presence of IFN-gamma. We conclude that previous reports linking SOCS1 to TLR signaling are most likely due to effects on IFN-alpha/beta receptor signaling.

Animals↗

The comparative roles of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 and -3 in the inhibition and desensitization of cytokine signaling.

Negative feedback is a mechanism commonly employed in biological processes as a means of maintaining homeostasis. We have investigated the roles of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins in regulating the kinetics of negative feedback in response to cytokine signaling. In mouse livers and bone marrow-derived macrophages, both interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) rapidly induced the tyrosine phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1) and STAT3. STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation was bi-phasic in response to continuous IL-6 signaling. In macrophages lacking Socs3, however, continuous IL-6 signaling induced uniformly high levels of STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation, and early IL-6-inducible genes were inappropriately expressed at intermediate time points. SOCS3 therefore imposes bi-phasic kinetics upon IL-6 signaling. Compared with Socs3 mRNA, Socs1 mRNA was induced relatively slowly, and SOCS1 simply attenuated the duration of IFNgamma signaling. Surprisingly, heightened Socs1 mRNA expression but minimal STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation was observed after prolonged stimulation with IFNgamma, indicating that STAT1 may not play a large role in inducing Socs1 mRNA during steady-state IFNgamma signaling. We also demonstrate that both SOCS1 and SOCS3 can desensitize primary bone marrow-derived macrophages to IFNgamma and IL-6 signaling, respectively. Consistent with the kinetics with which Socs1 and Socs3 mRNAs were induced, SOCS3 desensitized cells to IL-6 rapidly, whereas SOCS1-mediated desensitization to IFNgamma occurred at later time points. The kinetics with which SOCS proteins are induced by cytokine may therefore be a parameter that is "hard-wired" into specific cytokine signaling pathways as a means of tailoring the kinetics with which cells become desensitized.

Animals↗

Biophysical studies of signal peptides: implications for signal sequence functions and the involvement of lipid in protein export.

This review discusses efforts to understand the mode of action of signal sequences by biophysical study of synthetic peptides corresponding to these protein localization signals. On the basis of reports from several laboratories, it is now clear that signal peptides may adopt a variety of conformations, depending on their local environment. In membrane-mimetic systems like detergent micelles or lipid vesicles, they have a high tendency to form alpha helices. Ability to take up a helical conformation appears to be required at some point in the function of a signal sequence, since some peptides corresponding to export-defective signal sequences display reduced helical potential. By contrast, functional signal sequences share a high capacity to adopt alpha helices. High affinity for organized lipid assemblies, like monolayers or vesicles, is also a property of functional signal sequences. This correlation suggests a role for direct interaction of signal sequences with the lipids of the cytoplasmic membrane in vivo. Supporting this role are studies of the influence of signal peptides on lipid structure, which reveal an ability of these peptides to perturb lipid packing and to alter the phase state of the lipids. Insertion of the signal sequence in vivo could substantially reduce the barrier for translocation of the mature chain. Lastly, synthetic signal peptides have been added to native membranes and found to inhibit translocation of precursor proteins. This approach bridges the biophysical and the biochemical aspects of protein export and promises to shed light on the functional correlates of the properties and interactions observed in model systems.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Signal peptidases and signal peptide hydrolases.

Signal peptidases, the endoproteases that remove the amino-terminal signal sequence from many secretory proteins, have been isolated from various sources. Seven signal peptidases have been purified, two from E. coli, two from mammalian sources, and three from mitochondrial matrix. The mitochondrial enzymes are soluble and function as a heterogeneous dimer. The mammalian enzymes are isolated as a complex and share a common glycosylated subunit. The bacterial enzymes are isolated as monomers and show no sequence homology with each other or the mammalian enzymes. The membrane-bound enzymes seem to require a substrate containing a consensus sequence following the -3, -1 rule of von Heijne at the cleavage site; however, processing of the substrate is strongly influenced by the hydrophobic region of the signal peptide. The enzymes appear to recognize an unknown three-dimensional motif rather than a specific amino acid sequence around the cleavage site. The matrix mitochondrial enzymes are metallo-endopeptidases; however, the other signal peptidases may belong to a unique class of proteases as they are resistant to chelators and most protease inhibitors. There are no data concerning the substrate binding site of these enzymes. In vivo, the signal peptide is rapidly degraded. Three different enzymes in Escherichia coli that can degrade a signal peptide in vitro have been identified. The intact signal peptide is not accumulated in mutants lacking these enzymes, which suggests that these peptidases individually are not responsible for the degradation of an intact signal peptide in vivo. It is speculated that signal peptidases and signal peptide hydrolases are integral components of the secretory pathway and that inhibition of the terminal steps can block translocation.

Animals↗

Human secretory signal peptide description by hidden Markov model and generation of a strong artificial signal peptide for secreted protein expression.

A hidden Markov model (HMM) has been used to describe, predict, identify, and generate secretory signal peptide sequences. The relative strengths of artificial secretory signals emitted from the human signal peptide HMM (SP-HMM) correlate with their HMM bit scores as determined by their effectiveness to direct alkaline phosphatase secretion. The nature of the signal strength is in effect the closeness to the consensus. The HMM bit score of 8 is experimentally determined to be the threshold for discriminating signal sequences from non-secretory ones. An artificial SP-HMM generated signal sequence of the maximum model bit score (HMM + 38) was selected as an ideal human signal sequence. This signal peptide (secrecon) directs strong protein secretion and expression. We further ranked the signal strengths of the signal peptides of the known human secretory proteins by SP-HMM bit scores. The applications of high-bit scoring HMM signals in recombinant protein production and protein engineering are discussed.

Cell Line↗

Signal-transducing protein phosphorylation cascades mediated by Ras/Rho proteins in the mammalian cell: the potential for multiplex signalling.

The features of three distinct protein phosphorylation cascades in mammalian cells are becoming clear. These signalling pathways link receptor-mediated events at the cell surface or intracellular perturbations such as DNA damage to changes in cytoskeletal structure, vesicle transport and altered transcription factor activity. The best known pathway, the Ras-->Raf-->MEK-->ERK cascade [where ERK is extracellular-signal-regulated kinase and MEK is mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/ERK kinase], is typically stimulated strongly by mitogens and growth factors. The other two pathways, stimulated primarily by assorted cytokines, hormones and various forms of stress, predominantly utilize p21 proteins of the Rho family (Rho, Rac and CDC42), although Ras can also participate. Diagnostic of each pathway is the MAP kinase component, which is phosphorylated by a unique dual-specificity kinase on both tyrosine and threonine in one of three motifs (Thr-Glu-Tyr, Thr-Phe-Tyr or Thr-Gly-Tyr), depending upon the pathway. In addition to activating one or more protein phosphorylation cascades, the initiating stimulus may also mobilize a variety of other signalling molecules (e.g. protein kinase C isoforms, phospholipid kinases, G-protein alpha and beta gamma subunits, phospholipases, intracellular Ca2+). These various signals impact to a greater or lesser extent on multiple downstream effectors. Important concepts are that signal transmission often entails the targeted relocation of specific proteins in the cell, and the reversible formation of protein complexes by means of regulated protein phosphorylation. The signalling circuits may be completed by the phosphorylation of upstream effectors by downstream kinases, resulting in a modulation of the signal. Signalling is terminated and the components returned to the ground state largely by dephosphorylation. There is an indeterminant amount of cross-talk among the pathways, and many of the proteins in the pathways belong to families of closely related proteins. The potential for more than one signal to be conveyed down a pathway simultaneously (multiplex signalling) is discussed. The net effect of a given stimulus on the cell is the result of a complex intracellular integration of the intensity and duration of activation of the individual pathways. The specific outcome depends on the particular signalling molecules expressed by the target cells and on the dynamic balance among the pathways.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Chemical signals in the marine environment: dispersal, detection, and temporal signal analysis.

Chemical signals connect most of life's processes, including interorganismal relationships. Detection of chemical signals involves not only recognition of a spectrum of unique compounds or mixtures of compounds but also their spatial and temporal distribution. Both spectral and temporal signal processing determine what is a signal and what is background noise. Each animal extracts its unique information from the chemical world and uniquely contributes to it. Lobsters have provided important information on temporal signal processing. Marine chemical signals can be measured with high spatio-temporal resolution giving us a novel view of the lobster's environment. Lobster chemoreceptor cells have flicker fusion frequencies of 4 Hz and can integrate stimuli over 200 ms, closely corresponding to odor sampling behavior with 4-Hz "sniffs." Using this information, spatial odor gradients can be determined from temporal analysis of odor patches typical of turbulent dispersal. Lobsters appear to use this information to locate odor sources. Lobster social behavior depends greatly on chemical signals. Urine carries important information for courtship, dominance, and individual recognition. A novel gland in the nephropore is strategically located to release its products into the urine. Urine, in turn, is injected into the gill current, which jets water 1-2 m ahead of the animal. Lobsters control three different currents that carry chemical signals to and from them. The study of odor dynamics has only just begun. It will be exciting to see how signal dispersal, receptor temporal tuning, neural processing, and animal behavior interact to enhance signals for communication and detection and to reduce signals for chemical camouflage.

Aggression↗

Residues flanking the COOH-terminal C-region of a model eukaryotic signal peptide influence the site of its cleavage by signal peptidase and the extent of coupling of its co-translational translocation and proteolytic processing in vitro.

The polar, COOH-terminal c-region of signal peptides has been considered to be most important for influencing the efficiency and fidelity of signal peptidase cleavage while the hydrophobic core or h-region appears indispensable for initiating translocation. To identify structural features of residues flanking the c-region that influence the fidelity and efficiency of signal peptidase cleavage as well as co-translational translocation, we introduced six amino acid substitutions into the COOH terminus of the hydrophobic core and seven substitutions at the NH2 terminus of the mature region (the +1 position) of a model eukaryotic preprotein-human pre(delta pro)apoA-II. This preprotein contains several potential sites for signal peptidase cleavage. The functional consequences of these mutations were assayed using an in vitro co-translational translocation/processing system and by post-translational cleavage with purified, detergent-solubilized, hen oviduct signal peptidase. The efficiency of translocation could be correlated with the hydrophobic character of the residue introduced at the COOH terminus of the h-region. Some h/c boundary mutants underwent co-translational translocation across the microsomal membrane with only minimal cleavage yet they were cleaved post-translationally by hen oviduct signal peptidase more efficiently than other mutants which exhibited a high degree of coupling of co-translational translocation and cleavage. These data suggest that features at the COOH terminus of the h-domain can influence "presentation" of the cleavage site to signal peptidase. The +1 residue substitutions had minor effects on the extent of co-translational translocation and processing. However, these +1, as well as h/c boundary mutations, had dramatic effects on the site of cleavage chosen by signal peptidase, indicating that residues flanking the c-region of this prototypic eukaryotic signal peptide can affect the fidelity of its proteolytic processing. The site(s) selected by canine microsomal and purified hen oviduct signal peptidase were very similar, suggesting that "intrinsic" structural features of this prepeptide can influence the selectivity of eukaryotic signal peptidase cleavage, independent of the microsomal membrane and associated translocation apparatus.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Wild type and mutant signal peptides of Escherichia coli outer membrane lipoprotein interact with equal efficiency with mammalian signal recognition particle.

The signal peptide of the outer membrane lipoprotein (OMLP) of Escherichia coli was shown to be capable of promoting protein translocation across mammalian microsomal membranes in vitro. We assayed translocation of a fusion protein containing the OMLP signal peptide and nine amino acids of OMLP fused in frame to beta-lactamase. The efficiency with which the mammalian translocation machinery recognizes and accepts the OMLP signal peptide as substrate is indistinguishable from that of mammalian secretory proteins. Upon translocation mammalian signal peptidase processes the pre-OMLP-beta-lactamase protein at different sites than are utilized in vivo by E. coli OMLP signal peptidase (signal peptidase II) but that can be predicted as mammalian signal peptidase cleavage sites. Mutants in the OMLP signal peptide were tested for their ability to promote translocation of the fusion protein in this assay system. It has been shown previously that mutants in the positively charged amino acids at the amino terminus of the signal peptide severely delay the translocation of OMLP in vivo in E. coli. However, these mutants had no detectable effect either on signal recognition by mammalian signal recognition particle or on the efficiency of translocation itself.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The role of the inhibitors of interleukin-6 signal transduction SHP2 and SOCS3 for desensitization of interleukin-6 signalling.

The immediate early response of cells treated with IL-6 (interleukin-6) is the activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3. The Src homology domain 2 (SH2)-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 and the feedback inhibitor SOCS3 (suppressor of cytokine signalling) are potent inhibitors of IL-6 signal transduction. Impaired function of SOCS3 or SHP2 leads to enhanced and prolonged IL-6 signalling. The inhibitory function of both proteins depends on their recruitment to the tyrosine motif 759 within glycoprotein gp130. In contrast to inactivation, desensitization of signal transduction is regarded as impaired responsiveness due to prestimulation. Usually, after activation the sensing receptor becomes inactivated by modifications such as phosphorylation, internalization or degradation. We designed an experimental approach which allows discrimination between desensitization and inactivation of IL-6 signal transduction. We observed that pre-stimulation with IL-6 renders cells less sensitive to further stimulation with IL-6. After several hours, the cells become sensitive again. We show that not only signal transduction through previously activated receptors is affected by desensitization but signalling through receptors which were not targeted by the first stimulation was also attenuated ( trans -desensitization). Interestingly, in contrast to inhibition, desensitization does not depend on the presence of functional SHP2. Furthermore, cells lacking SOCS3 show constitutive STAT3 activation which is not affected by pre-stimulation with IL-6. All these observations suggest that desensitization and inhibition of signalling are mechanistically distinct.

Animals↗

Molecular dissection of 2B4 signaling: implications for signal transduction by SLAM-related receptors.

2B4 is a SLAM-related receptor expressed on natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T cells. It can regulate killing and gamma interferon secretion by NK cells, as well as T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. There are conflicting data regarding the mechanism of action of 2B4. In these studies, we attempted to understand better the nature and basis of 2B4 signaling. Our studies showed that engagement of 2B4 on NK cells triggered a tyrosine phosphorylation signal implicating 2B4, Vav-1, and, to a lesser extent, SHIP-1 and c-Cbl. Structure-function analyses demonstrated that this response was defined by a series of tyrosine-based motifs in the cytoplasmic region of 2B4 and was not influenced by the extracellular or transmembrane segment of 2B4. In addition, the 2B4-induced signal was absolutely dependent on coexpression of SAP, a Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing adaptor associating with SLAM-related receptors and mutated in X-linked lymphoproliferative disease. It was also observed that 2B4 was detectably associated with the Src-related protein tyrosine kinase FynT in an immortalized NK cell line. Mutation of arginine 78 of SAP, a residue critical for binding of SAP to FynT, eliminated 2B4-mediated protein tyrosine phosphorylation, implying that SAP promotes 2B4 signaling most probably by recruiting FynT. Finally, despite the similarities in the signaling modalities of 2B4 and its relative SLAM, the natures of the tyrosine phosphorylation signals induced by these two receptors were found to be different. These differences were not caused by variations in the extent of binding to SAP but rather were dictated by the tyrosine-based sequences in the cytoplasmic domain of the receptors. Taken together, these data lead to a better understanding of 2B4 signaling. Furthermore, they provide firm evidence that the signals transduced by the various SLAM-related receptors are unique and that the specificity of these signals is defined by the distinctive arrays of intracytoplasmic tyrosines in the receptors.

Animals↗

The signaling helix: a common functional theme in diverse signaling proteins.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism by which the signals are transmitted between receptor and effector domains in multi-domain signaling proteins is poorly understood. RESULTS: Using sensitive sequence analysis methods we identify a conserved helical segment of around 40 residues in a wide range of signaling proteins, including numerous sensor histidine kinases such as Sln1p, and receptor guanylyl cyclases such as the atrial natriuretic peptide receptor and nitric oxide receptors. We term this helical segment the signaling (S)-helix and present evidence that it forms a novel parallel coiled-coil element, distinct from previously known helical segments in signaling proteins, such as the Dimerization-Histidine phosphotransfer module of histidine kinases, the intra-cellular domains of the chemotaxis receptors, inter-GAF domain helical linkers and the alpha-helical HAMP module. Analysis of domain architectures allowed us to reconstruct the domain-neighborhood graph for the S-helix, which showed that the S-helix almost always occurs between two signaling domains. Several striking patterns in the domain neighborhood of the S-helix also became evident from the graph. It most often separates diverse N-terminal sensory domains from various C-terminal catalytic signaling domains such as histidine kinases, cNMP cyclase, PP2C phosphatases, NtrC-like AAA+ ATPases and diguanylate cyclases. It might also occur between two sensory domains such as PAS domains and occasionally between a DNA-binding HTH domain and a sensory domain. The sequence conservation pattern of the S-helix revealed the presence of a unique constellation of polar residues in the dimer-interface positions within the central heptad of the coiled-coil formed by the S-helix. CONCLUSION: Combining these observations with previously reported mutagenesis studies on different S-helix-containing proteins we suggest that it functions as a switch that prevents constitutive activation of linked downstream signaling domains. However, upon occurrence of specific conformational changes due to binding of ligand or other sensory inputs in a linked upstream domain it transmits the signal to the downstream domain. Thus, the S-helix represents one of the most prevalent functional themes involved in the flow of signals between modules in diverse prokaryote-type multi-domain signaling proteins. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Frank Eisenhaber, Arcady Mushegian and Sandor Pongor.

Journal Article↗

Signal peptides bind and aggregate RNA. An alternative explanation for GTPase inhibition in the signal recognition particle.

N-terminal signal sequences can direct nascent protein chains to the inner membrane of prokaryotes and the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotes by interacting with the signal recognition particle. In this study, we show that isolated peptides corresponding to several bacterial signal sequences inhibit the GTPase activity of the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle, as previously reported (Miller, J. D., Bernstein, H. D., and Walter, P. (1994) Nature 367, 657-659), but not by the direct mechanism proposed. Instead, isolated signal peptides bind nonspecifically to the RNA component and aggregate the entire signal recognition particle, leading to a loss of its intrinsic GTPase activity. Surprisingly, only "functional" peptide sequences aggregate RNA; the peptides in general use as "nonfunctional" negative controls (e.g. those with deletions or charged substitutions within the hydrophobic core), are sufficiently different in physical character that they do not aggregate RNA and thus have no effect on the GTPase activity of the signal recognition particle. We propose that the reported effect of functional signal peptides on the GTPase activity of the signal recognition particle is an artifact of the high peptide concentrations and low salt conditions used in these in vitro studies and that signal sequences at the N terminus of nascent chains in vivo do not exhibit this activity.

GTP Phosphohydrolases↗