SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the patency of standard and modified Portex tracheostomy tubes inserted by the percutaneous dilatational technique. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Medical-surgical ICUs in a tertiary care community hospital. PATIENTS: Medical-surgical ICU patients requiring tracheostomy. INTERVENTIONS: Consecutive medical-surgical ICU patients requiring tracheostomy were eligible for the study. Percutaneous tracheostomy tubes were inserted using the percutaneous dilatational technique with bronchoscopic guidance. The study population consisted of the following two groups: group 1 (receiving the standard Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tube); and group 2 (receiving the modified Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tube). Patients underwent daily fiberoptic evaluation to assess tracheostomy tube patency following the first 72 h after the tracheostomy tube placement. Demographic data and clinical signs or symptoms of airway obstruction were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received the standard percutaneous tracheostomy tube (group 1), and 17 patients received the modified percutaneous tracheostomy tube (group 2). Partial tracheostomy tube occlusion (> 25%) was observed in 21 of 37 group 1 patients (57%) and in 1 of 17 group 2 patients (6%; p < 0.005). Fifteen of 37 group 1 patients (41%) and none of the group 2 patients sustained a > or = 40% occlusion of the distal tracheostomy tube opening (p < 0.005). One patient from group 1 had clinical manifestations of tracheostomy tube obstruction. None of the patients in group 2 experienced signs or symptoms of airway obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The standard Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tubes used in this study were associated with partial airway obstruction. Modifications of the standard Portex percutaneous tracheostomy tube markedly decreased the airway obstruction. Due to the findings in this study, the authors recommend abandoning the continued use of the Portex Per-fit percutaneous tracheostomy tube in its current configuration and replacing it with the modified tracheostomy tube described in this study.
OBJECTIVE: The role of tracheostomy in burn patients is controversial. Previous studies, primarily in adults, suggested that severely burned patients with tracheostomies have a higher incidence of tracheostomy site infections, mortality, and pneumonia. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of early tracheostomy in severely burned children. DESIGN: Case series study analyzing mechanical ventilation and sedation requirements before and 24 hrs after tracheostomy. SETTING: Regional pediatric burn center. PATIENTS: All children admitted to a regional pediatric burn center requiring tracheostomy from March 1, 1998, to October 1, 2001. METHODS: Data were recorded on patients' demographics, extent of burn, presence of inhalation injury, and mortality. Mechanical ventilation variables measured pretracheostomy (pre) and posttracheostomy (post) and included mode of ventilation, ventilator settings, peak inspiratory pressures, and arterial blood gases (Pao2, Paco2, pH, and oxygen saturation). Calculated variables included compliance, Pao2:Fio2 ratio, and minute ventilation. Tracheostomy-related variables recorded included the interval to tracheostomy insertion, the duration of tracheostomy, and tracheostomy complications. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (with a mean age of 4.7 +/- 0.6 yrs and a mean total body surface area involvement of 54% +/- 4%, 63% with inhalation injury) underwent tracheostomy a mean of 3.9 +/- 0.7 days after admission. Overall mortality was 21%. There were no tracheostomy site infections, tracheostomy-related deaths, or tracheal stenoses in survivors. Peak inspiratory pressures were lower after tracheostomy (30.4 +/- 1.4 [pre] vs. 27.6 +/- 1.5 cm H2O [post]; p <.05), ventilatory volumes were higher (190 +/- 22 mL [pre] vs. 225.5 +/- 25 [post]; p <.05), compliance improved (10.5 +/- 1.4 [pre] vs. 15.1 +/- 2.3 mL/cm H2O [post]; p <.05), and the Pao2:Fio2 ratio improved (300.6 +/- 20 [pre] vs. 348.6 +/- 16 [post]). There was no difference in oxygenation, ventilation, minute ventilation, or pH after tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Early tracheostomy in severely burned children is safe and effective. It provides a secure airway and may result in improvement in ventilator management for these children.
OBJECTIVE: Previous tracheostomy has been considered a relative contraindication for percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients with a history of previous tracheostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center case series of all consecutive patients requiring repeat tracheostomy for continued mechanical ventilatory support. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a tertiary-care referral center. SUBJECTS: Fourteen patients (eight female, six male) with a median age of 70 yrs (range, 33-94). All patients had previously undergone tracheostomy. INTERVENTION: Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjects' previous tracheostomies dated back between 10 days and 8 yrs. Present intubation time before percutaneous dilational tracheostomy varied between 4 and 30 days. Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy was performed successfully in all 14 patients by trained pulmonologists and surgeons. Eleven patients received an 8-mm and three received a 7-mm tracheostomy tube. There were no significant periprocedural complications, and no patient required surgical revision. The only postprocedural complication was accidental decannulation in one patient, which was managed with repeat percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Trained physicians can safely perform bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy after previous tracheostomy. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy offers an alternative to surgical tracheostomy in this particular patient population and should not be considered contraindicated.
OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical predictors for tracheostomy among patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and to describe the outcomes of patients receiving a tracheostomy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Intensive care units of Barnes-Jewish Hospital, an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 521 patients requiring mechanical ventilation in an ICU for >12 hours. INTERVENTIONS: Prospective patient surveillance and data collection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main variables studied were hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU and the hospital, and acquired organ-system derangements. Fifty-one (9.8%) patients received a tracheostomy. The hospital mortality of patients with a tracheostomy was statistically less than the hospital mortality of patients not receiving a tracheostomy (13.7% vs. 26.4%; p = .048), despite having a similar severity of illness at the time of admission to the ICU (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II scores, 19.2 +/- 6.1 vs. 17.8 +/- 7.2; p = .173). Patients receiving a tracheostomy had significantly longer durations of mechanical ventilation (19.5 +/- 15.7 days vs. 4.1 +/- 5.3 days; p < .001) and hospitalization (30.9 +/- 18.1 days vs. 12.8 +/- 10.1 days; p < .001) compared with patients not receiving a tracheostomy. Similarly, the average duration of intensive care was significantly longer among the hospital nonsurvivors receiving a tracheostomy (n = 7) compared with the hospital nonsurvivors without a tracheostomy (n = 124; 30.9 +/- 16.3 days vs. 7.9 +/- 7.3 days; p < .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the development of nosocomial pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.24-6.87; p < .001), the administration of aerosol treatments (AOR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.184.13; p < .001), having a witnessed aspiration event (AOR, 3.79; 95% CI, 2.30-6.24; p = .008), and requiring reintubation (AOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.54-3.18; p = .028) were variables independently associated with patients undergoing tracheostomy and receiving prolonged ventilatory support. Among the 44 survivors receiving a tracheostomy in the ICU, 38 (86.4%) were alive 30 days after hospital discharge and 31 (70.5%) were living at home. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having longer lengths of stay in the ICU and hospital, patients with respiratory failure who received a tracheostomy had favorable outcomes compared with patients who did not receive a tracheostomy. These data suggest that physicians are capable of selecting critically ill patients who most likely will benefit from placement of a tracheostomy. Additionally, specific clinical variables were identified as risk factors for prolonged ventilatory assistance and the need for tracheostomy.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT) is increasingly being used in the intensive care unit (ICU), and has probably increased the number of procedures performed. The primary aim of this study was to document the short- and long-term outcome of patients with a tracheostomy performed during an ICU stay. METHODS: Patients in our ICU who underwent an unplanned tracheostomy between 1997 and 2003 were included in this analysis. The type of tracheostomy (PDT or surgical tracheostomy) and time of the procedure were registered prospectively in our ICU database. Survival was followed using the People's Registry of Norway and morbidity data from the individual hospital record. These patients were also compared with a group of ICU patients ventilated for more than 24 h, but managed without a tracheostomy. We also compared patients who had early tracheostomy (less than median time to procedure) with those who had late tracheostomy. RESULTS: Of the 2844 admissions (2581 patients), unplanned tracheostomy was performed during 461 admissions (16.2%) on 454 patients (17.6%). The median time to tracheostomy was 6 days. The ICU, hospital and 1-year mortality rates were 10.8, 27.1 and 37.2%, respectively, significantly less than those of the group ventilated without tracheostomy. The median time to decannulation was 14 days. Patients who had early tracheostomy had a more favourable long-term survival than those who had late tracheostomy. No procedure-related mortality was registered. CONCLUSIONS: In our ICU, having a tracheostomy performed was associated with a favourable long-term outcome with regard to survival, and early tracheostomy improved survival in addition to consuming less ICU resources.
Percutaneous tracheostomy has been touted as the preferred route of tracheostomy. However, to date, no prospective randomized study comparing bedside percutaneous (BP) to bedside open (BO) tracheostomy has been performed. Surgical intensive care unit (sICU) patients were randomized to receive either a BP or a BO tracheostomy. Patients were monitored for complications. Procedure time was documented. A group of medical ICU patients had open tracheostomies in the operating room (OR) and served as contemporaneous controls. Over 11 months, there were 24 surgical ICU patients randomized to receive either BP tracheostomy or BO tracheostomy, 12 in each group. Forty-six medical ICU patients received standard open tracheostomy in the OR. The number of ventilator days before placing the tracheostomy was similar between the BP and BO groups, 9.8 and 12.4, respectively. The clinical indications for tracheostomy were similar between the two groups. The procedure time for the BP group was 14.5 minutes, whereas 25.2 minutes for the BO group. There were no postprocedure complications in the BP and BO groups. There was a trend toward more complications in the BP group, including the loss of the airway, leading to death. The procedure time and complications were similar between the BO and OR groups. These data do not support that BP tracheostomy is the preferred route of tracheostomy when compared with BO tracheostomy. These data support that experienced surgical intensivists can perform BO tracheostomies with lower risk and cost, when compared with BP tracheostomy.
The aim of the study was to compare conventional tracheostomy with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients with inhalation burn injury. A total of 37 patients with severe burn injuries and associated inhalation injury, underwent percutaneous tracheostomy in our burn unit and were retrospectively compared with 22 patients who underwent conventional surgical tracheostomy. In the first group, 25 of 37 patients and in the second group 17 of 22 patients presented with partial or full-thickness burn injuries (or both) in the neck region. The cost of the procedure, operating time, complications, and incidence of pulmonary infection were recorded. There were no significant perioperative complications in the percutaneous tracheostomy group, and no patient required surgical revision or conversion to surgical tracheostomy. In the conventional tracheostomy group, 2 patients developed tracheal stenosis, 1 had a tracheoesophageal fistula, and 10 had stomal infections. The average procedure time in the first group was 9 minutes, and in the second group it was 22 minutes. The cost of the bedside percutaneous tracheostomy was one-fifth the cost of a conventional tracheostomy. The incidence of pulmonary sepsis was 45% after percutaneous tracheostomy compared to 68% after conventional tracheostomy. With the percutaneous technique, spontaneous closure of the stoma occurred within 1 to 3 days after removal of the tracheostomy tube, whereas with the conventional technique it was within 5 to 7 days. Percutaneous tracheostomy is associated with a lower complication rate and can be safely performed at the bedside. Moreover, it is faster and can be done at a lower cost than conventional open tracheostomy.
BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical spine injury may require both anterior cervical spine fusion and tracheostomy, particularly in the setting of associated cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite the close proximity of the two surgical incisions, we postulated that tracheostomy could be safely performed after anterior spine fixation. In addition, we postulated that the severity of motor deficits in patients with cervical spine injury would correlate with the need for tracheostomy. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all adult trauma patients diagnosed with cervical spine fractures or cervical SCI admitted between June 1996 and June 2001 at our university Level I trauma center. Demographic data, severity of neurologic injury based on the classification of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), complications, and use and type of tracheostomy were collected. In the subgroup of patients with unstable cervical spine injury that underwent anterior stabilization and tracheostomy, data regarding timing and technique of these procedures and wound outcomes were also collected. Categorical data were analyzed using chi analysis using Yates correction when appropriate, with p <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: During this time period, 275 adult survivors were diagnosed with cervical spinal cord or bony injury. Forty-five percent of patients with SCI (27 of 60) and 14% of patients without SCI (30 of 215) underwent tracheostomy (p <0.001). Moreover, on the basis of the ASIA classification system, 76% of ASIA A and B patients, 38% of ASIA C patients, 23% of ASIA D patients, and 14% of ASIA E patients were treated with tracheostomy (p <0.001). In the subgroup that underwent both anterior spine fixation and tracheostomy (n=17), the median time interval from spine fixation to airway placement was 7 days (interquartile range, 6-10 days), with 71% of these tracheostomies performed percutaneously. No patient developed a wound infection or nonunion as a consequence of tracheostomy placement, and there were no deaths because of complications of either procedure. CONCLUSION: These data support the safety of tracheostomy insertion 6 to 10 days after anterior cervical spine fixation, particularly in the presence of cervical SCI. The presence of severe motor neurologic deficits was strongly associated with the use of tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine injury. Percutaneous tracheostomy, which is our technique of choice, may be advantageous in this setting by virtue of creating only a small wound. The optimal timing and use of tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine injury requires further study.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the integral role played by tracheostomy in the management of trauma patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), its timing remains subject to considerable practice variation. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of early tracheostomy on the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and outcomes in trauma ICU patients. METHODS: The following data were obtained from a prospective ICU database containing information on all trauma patients who received tracheostomy over a 5-year period: demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, type of injuries, ICU and hospital outcomes, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and the type of tracheostomy procedure (percutaneous versus surgical). Tracheostomy was considered early if it was performed by day 7 of mechanical ventilation. We compared the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and outcome between early and late tracheostomy patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of tracheostomy timing on ICU stay. RESULTS: Of 653 trauma ICU patients, 136 (21%) required tracheostomies, 29 of whom were early and 107 were late. Age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Injury Severity Score were not different between the two groups. Patients with early tracheostomy were more likely to have maxillofacial injuries and to have lower Glasgow Coma Scale score. Duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter with early tracheostomy (mean +/- standard error: 9.6 +/- 1.2 days versus 18.7 +/- 1.3 days; P < 0.0001). Similarly, ICU LOS was significantly shorter (10.9 +/- 1.2 days versus 21.0 +/- 1.3 days; P < 0.0001). Following tracheostomy, patients were discharged from the ICU after comparable periods in both groups (4.9 +/- 1.2 days versus 4.9 +/- 1.1 days; not significant). ICU and hospital mortality rates were similar. Using multivariate analysis, late tracheostomy was an independent predictor of prolonged ICU stay (>14 days). CONCLUSION: Early tracheostomy in trauma ICU patients is associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU LOS, without affecting ICU or hospital outcome. Adopting a standardized strategy of early tracheostomy in appropriately selected patients may help in reducing unnecessary resource utilization.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We have a conservative approach to tracheostomy in intensive care, in that every patient considered for tracheostomy in our unit is discussed at a clinical meeting to evaluate potential benefit and harm from the procedure. This study examined tracheostomy numbers, complications and outcome of patients who had tracheostomy in comparison to our general intensive care population and to Scottish national data. METHODS: We collected prospective data on all patients having a tracheostomy over a three year period. Data included included time to tracheostomy, type of procedure (open or percutaneous), ventilator settings immediately before tracheostomy, peri- and post-operative complications and mortality. RESULTS: The number of tracheostomies was low (27 of 692 patients, 4%) and time to tracheostomy high (mean, 18 days) in comparison to published data. Patients who had a tracheostomy had a hospital mortality that was greater than predicted by the APACHE II scoring system (55% actual mortality vs. 44% predicted). Standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.29 for tracheostomy patients and 0.89 for patients who did not have a tracheostomy. Length of stay and mortality were similar to national figures. One patient in the tracheostomy group developed tracheal stenosis that needed surgical intervention. There were no cases of symptomatic tracheal stenosis in the much larger group managed with orotracheal intubation alone. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a conservative approach to performing tracheostomy reduced the number of procedures performed without affecting overall unit outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical outcomes of early versus late tracheostomy in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A prospective observational study was done. The sample was a cohort of 90 patients who had tracheostomy in the medical intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. Primary outcome measures were duration of mechanical ventilation and total cost of hospitalization. Tracheostomy was defined as early if performed by day 10 of mechanical ventilation and late if performed thereafter. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had early tracheostomy (mean +/- SD = day 5.9 +/- 7.2 of ventilation), and 37 patients had late tracheostomy (mean +/- SD = day 16.7 +/- 2.9) (P < .001). The mean (+/- SD) duration of mechanical ventilation was 28.3 +/- 28.2 days in the early-tracheostomy group versus 34.4 +/- 17.8 days in the late-tracheostomy group (P = .005). Total cost of hospitalization was significantly lower in the early-tracheostomy group (mean +/- SD = $86,189 +/- $53,570) than in the late-tracheostomy group (mean +/- SD = $124,649 +/- $54,282) (P = .001). Male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 3.84; 95% CI = 2.32-6.34; P = .007) and higher ratios of PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (adjusted odds ratio = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00-1.01; P = .03) were associated with early tracheostomy. The timing of tracheostomy was not associated with hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Early tracheostomy is associated with shorter lengths of stay and lower hospital costs than is late tracheostomy among patients in the medical intensive care unit. Prospective clinical trials are necessary to determine the optimal timing of tracheostomy in that setting.
Tracheostomy tubes are used to administer positive-pressure ventilation, to provide a patent airway, to provide protection from aspiration, and to provide access to the lower respiratory tract for airway clearance. They are available in a variety of sizes and styles, from several manufacturers. The dimensions of tracheostomy tubes are given by their inner diameter, outer diameter, length, and curvature. Differences in length between tubes of the same inner diameter, but from different manufacturers, are not commonly appreciated but may have important clinical implications. Tracheostomy tubes can be angled or curved, a feature that can be used to improve the fit of the tube in the trachea. Extra proximal length tubes facilitate placement in patients with large necks, and extra distal length tubes facilitate placement in patients with tracheal anomalies. Several tube designs have a spiral wire reinforced flexible design and have an adjustable flange design to allow bedside adjustments to meet extra-length tracheostomy tube needs. Tracheostomy tubes can be cuffed or uncuffed. Cuffs on tracheostomy tubes include high-volume low-pressure cuffs, tight-to-shaft cuffs, and foam cuffs. The fenestrated tracheostomy tube has an opening in the posterior portion of the tube, above the cuff, which allows the patient to breathe through the upper airway when the inner cannula is removed. Tracheostomy tubes with an inner cannula are called dual-cannula tracheostomy tubes. Several tracheostomy tubes are designed specifically for use with the percutaneous tracheostomy procedure. Others are designed with a port above the cuff that allows for subglottic aspiration of secretions. The tracheostomy button is used for stoma maintenance. It is important for clinicians caring for patients with a tracheostomy tube to understand the nuances of various tracheostomy tube designs and to select a tube that appropriately fits the patient.
BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy after median sternotomy is associated with an increased risk of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI). However, associated comorbidities in these patients make the exact risk of tracheostomy difficult to discern. Therefore, we performed a retrospective review to determine the risk of DSWI in our cardiac surgery patients who underwent postoperative tracheostomy. METHODS: Our cardiac surgery database was queried from January 1996 to July 2003. Perioperative morbidities were identified for all patients who underwent tracheostomy after cardiac surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using chi2 analysis and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: During the study period, 16,277 cardiac procedures were performed through a median sternotomy. Tracheostomy was performed in 291 patients (1.8%). Deep sternal wound infections occurred in 0.8% of all patients and in 3.4% of patients (9 of 268) who underwent tracheostomy. Mean number of days to tracheostomy was 14.2 in the DSWI group and 15.8 in the non-DSWI group (p = 0.45). In patients with a tracheostomy, preoperative renal failure was the only perioperative comorbidity found to be significantly associated with DSWI (p = 0.03). Overall operative mortality was 3.6%. Mortality was 16.5% for patients with DSWI, 22.7% for patients requiring tracheostomy, and 55% for patients with DSWI and tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DSWI after tracheostomy, in our experience, is not as high as previously reported. Tracheostomy can be performed safely after median sternotomy with a low morbidity and mortality rate. However, if DSWI occurs after tracheostomy, mortality is significant.
The objective of this study was to demonstrate that bedside burn intensive care unit tracheostomy is a safe and cost-effective procedure and has advantages over operating room tracheostomy. The charts of all patients who underwent tracheostomies in the burn unit between January 1990 and September 1993 were reviewed retrospectively. All tracheostomies were performed by residents in their second to fourth postgraduate years. The identical operating room technique was used for all bedside procedures including complete instrument tray, electrocautery, and adequate lighting. Standard tracheostomies were routinely performed at the bedside instead of the operating room in an attempt to deal with an increasing number of critically ill patients with burns requiring operating room surgical procedures. No patient-specific criteria were used to determine whether bedside or operating room tracheostomy would be performed. Charges for bedside intensive care unit and operating room tracheostomy were compared. Group t test and chi-square analysis were used with significance set at p < 0.05. Forty-three tracheostomies were performed in the 45-month period reviewed. Twenty-five tracheostomies performed in the operating room were compared with the 18 tracheostomies performed at the bedside in the burn intensive care unit. No statistical difference existed in age, sex, mean total body surface area percent burned, mean inspired oxygen, mean positive end expiratory pressure, mean pretracheostomy intubated days, presence of inhalation injury, or complication rate between groups. The average combined cost for operating room and anesthesia was $1740 per tracheostomy performed in the operating room. No charge was given to the patient for a bedside tracheostomy apart from the surgeon's fee and tracheostomy tube.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) require mechanical ventilation during the course of treatment. For these patients, tracheostomy is necessary in cases of protracted weaning. As only limited data exist about predictors for a tracheostomy in patients with ICH, the aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of tracheostomy and clinical findings that increase the risk for a tracheostomy in patients with supratentorial hemorrhage. METHODS: A total of 392 patients with supratentorial ICH were analyzed. The parameters age, gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Glasgow Coma Scale on admission, ganglionic or non-ganglionic localization, presence of ventricular hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, hematoma volume, and hematoma evacuation were investigated. The effects on the end-point tracheostomy were analyzed using multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall need for tracheostomy was 9.9% (16.3% in patients with ganglionic hemorrhage versus 2.8% in patients with non-ganglionic hemorrhages). 31% of the ventilated patients required tracheostomy. The risk for tracheostomy was increased eightfold in patients who developed hydrocephalus. The presence of ventricular blood, in general, showed no significant impact on the need for tracheostomy, whereas hemorrhage extending into the third and fourth ventricles in conjunction with hydrocephalus increased the risk for tracheostomy. The hematoma volume correlated positively with the risk for tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that approximately 10% of patients with ICH require tracheostomy during the course of their disease. Presence of COPD, hematoma volume, ganglionic location of the hematoma, and the development of hydrocephalus are predisposing factors for tracheostomy.