PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Version, Fetal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Clinical and sonographic diagnosis of occiput posterior position: a prospective study of 350 deliveries].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical reliability compared to intrapartum ultrasound as a tool to diagnose occiput posterior position and to investigate the proportion of rotations occurring during labour. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 350 women in labor with a singleton fetus in a vertex position were prospectively studied using ultrasound and obstetrical examination. Outcome of labor was also monitored. RESULTS: Reliability of clinical examination is 85,7%, initial occiput posterior position represented 40,2% and most rotated in an anterior position (84, 8%) while only 0,6% of initial anterior positions delivered in occiput posterior position. Logistic regression did not allow to find significant predictor of occiput posterior position rotation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Clinical examination is relatively reliable for posterior position diagnosis and in most cases, initially occipitoposterior positions rotate anteriorly.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Acupuncture plus moxibustion to resolve breech presentation: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: In many Western countries breech presentation is an indication for elective Cesarean section. In order to correct fetal presentation, the stimulation of the acupoint BL67 by moxibustion, acupuncture or both has been proposed. Since no studies had previously been carried out on Western populations, pregnant Italian women at 33-35 weeks gestational age carrying a fetus in breech presentation were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial involving an active BL67 point stimulation and an observation group. METHODS: A total of 240 women at 33-35 weeks of gestation carrying a fetus in breech presentation were randomized to receive active treatment (acupuncture plus moxibustion) or to be assigned to the observation group. Bilateral acupuncture plus moxibustion was applied at the BL67 acupoint (Zhiyin). The primary outcome of the study was fetal presentation at delivery. RESULTS: Fourteen cases dropped out. The final analysis was thus made on 226 cases, 114 randomized to observation and 112 to acupuncture plus moxibustion. At delivery, the proportion of cephalic version was lower in the observation group (36.7%) than in the active-treatment group (53.6 %) (p = 0.01). Hence, the proportion of Cesarean sections indicated for breech presentation was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the observation group (52.3% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture plus moxibustion is more effective than observation in revolving fetuses in breech presentation. Such a method appears to be a valid option for women willing to experience a natural birth.

Acupuncture↗
PubMed2000

[Placental location and its influence on the position of the fetus in the uterus].

There are different opinions concerning the influence of the placental localization on the position of the fetus in the uterus. Two options are suggested in breech presentation--placenta praevia and cornual localization as possible causes for breech presentation. The aim of the present prospective study is to establish the influence of placental localization on the fetal position in the uterus. Two groups of pregnant women were examined--the first with cephalic resentation (n = 125) and the second with breech presentation (n = 124). All of the pregnant women examined were nulliparas, with term pregnancy (37-40 weeks). Uterine and fetal abnormalities were excluded. The localization of the placenta was determined by ultrasonography. The cornu-fundal localization of the placenta was found in 4.8% in the pregnant women with cephalic presentation and 62.6% in pregnant women with breach presentation. Placenta praevia or low insertion of the placenta was found in 3.2% of the cases with breech presentation and in none of the cases with cephalic presentation. The authors conclude on the basis of the data in the study that the localization of the placenta influences the fetal position in the uterus.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed1983

Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?

To assess the risks associated with the use of Kielland's forceps 2708 consecutive deliveries were studied prospectively and the neonatal outcome related to the mode of delivery. Of the 1191 primigravidas, 279 (23.4%) underwent instrumental delivery, of whom 65 (5.5%) were delivered with Kielland's forceps. There was no difference in early neonatal outcome (as judged by Apgar scores, intubations, and admission to the special care baby unit) between these babies and those delivered normally or by non-rotational forceps, but a higher proportion of the 127 (10.7%) delivered by emergency caesarean section were compromised. Of the 1517 multigravid patients, only 57 (3.8%) underwent instrumental delivery, 15 (1.0%) by Kielland's forceps. Among these babies, also, the outcome was no worse than for those delivered normally, but the babies delivered by caesarean section showed a greatly increased incidence of low Apgar scores, intubations, and admission to the special care baby unit. There were no stillbirths or neonatal deaths among babies delivered by Kielland's forceps, nor were there any cases of severe birth trauma or of obvious neonatal morbidity.

Apgar Score↗
PubMed1975

[The clininal management of breech presentation].

During the period 1969--1973, a total of 7933 deliveries was carried out at the First University Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Vienna. Of these, 328 deliveries were breech presentations and 260 were single-born. The frequency of Caesarean sections in the case of breech presentations was 16,6%, i.e. about four times higher than the average frequency of Caesarean sections in relation to the overall number of obstetric patients of our clinic. The high frequency of premature deliveries in breech presentation (18,46%) is reflected in the perinatal mortality rate; 5,67% of all children born in breech position died sub or post partum. The net perinatal mortality rate was 1,15%.

Apgar Score↗
PubMed2005

A randomised controlled trial of moxibustion for breech presentation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of moxibustion for the correction of fetal breech presentation in a non-Chinese population. DESIGN: Single-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Six obstetric departments in Italy. SAMPLE: Healthy non-Chinese nulliparous pregnant women at 32-33 weeks + 3 days of gestational age with the fetus in breech presentation. METHODS: Random assignment to treatment or observation. Treatment consisted of moxibustion (stimulation with heat from a stick of Artemisia vulgaris) at the BL 67 acupuncture point (Zhiyin) for one or two weeks. Two weeks after recruitment, each participant was subjected to an ultrasonic examination of the fetal presentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of participants with cephalic presentation in the 35th week. RESULTS: The study was interrupted when 123 participants had been recruited (46% of the planned sample). Intermediate data monitoring revealed a high number of treatment interruptions. At this point no difference was found in cephalic presentation in the 35th week (treatment group: 22/65, 34%; control group: 21/58, 36%; RR 0.95; 99% CI 0.59-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: The results underline the methodological problems evaluating of a traditional treatment transferred from a different cultural context. They do not support either the effectiveness or the ineffectiveness of moxibustion in correcting fetal breech presentation.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

[Placental implantation as the cause of breech presentation].

The ultrasonographic study of 5294 singleton pregnancies between the 16 and 41 gestational weeks and 47 breech presentations at term revealed the following: The placenta was found in the mid-anterior or mid-posterior region of the uterus in 60.9 to 74.0%. In 12.8 to 18.7% of cases, the placenta was implanted in the fundal region before gestational week 28, but thereafter it was found in the cornual region in 13.8 to 19.1%. Of 47 cases with breech presentation at term, the placenta was implanted in the cornual region in 28, in the fundus in 7, in the lateral in 6, and in the mid-anterior or mid-posterior in another 6. In gestational weeks from 16 to 19, the breech presentation was found in 38% when the placenta was implanted in the cornual region, in 50% when it was implanted in the lateral region, 52.8% in the fundus, and 47.2% in the middle, with no significant difference in the incidence of occurrence. However in gestational weeks from 36 to 41, the incidence was 20.2, 6.4, 9.0 and 1.1% respectively and the spontaneous version rate was significantly higher when the placenta was implanted in the middle region than in others (p less than 0.01). The author has concluded that the breech presentation in single pregnancy is caused by the placental position; when it markedly indents and changes the inverted pear shape of the amniotic cavity, the spontaneous fetal cephalic version is inhibited.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed1989

413 cases of abnormal fetal position corrected by auricular plaster therapy.

The authors corrected the abnormal fetal position in 413 cases of pregnant women by the auricular plaster therapy (APT) with a success rate of 83.3%--remarkably higher than treatment by knee-chest positioning. Further analysis showed that APT was also superior to the knee-chest positioning for primiparae, breech fetal position, and pregnancies over 33 weeks. The authors also noted the clinical signs of successful cases and failures.

Acupuncture Points↗
PubMed1997

Reducing perineal trauma: implications of flexion and extension of the fetal head during birth.

In this paper a critical analysis of two popular perineal management techniques used during birth, flexing the baby's head and the Ritgen manoeuvre, are presented. Each technique claims to reduce perineal trauma by reducing the presenting diameter of the fetal skull through the woman's vaginal opening. These two techniques are, however, contradictory and act against the normal mechanisms of labour. In normal labour, the smallest diameter of the fetal skull, the suboccipito-bregmatic, presents through the woman's vaginal opening. In order to negotiate the 90 degrees curve in the birth canal, the baby must change from an attitude of flexion to an attitude of extension during birth. The Ritgen manoeuvre encourages early extension of the fetal head which causes a larger fetal head diameter, the occipito-frontal diameter, to present. Flexing the fetal head cannot cause a smaller diameter to present, and the pressure the birth attendant applies to flex the head serves only to retard the emergence of the baby and unnaturally force the emerging fetal head down toward the stretched perineum. The discussion outlines the implications of this analysis for practice.

Female↗
PubMed2005

Review of singleton fetal and neonatal deaths associated with cranial trauma and cephalic delivery during a national intrapartum-related confidential enquiry.

OBJECTIVE: To review delivery details of intrapartum-related fetal and neonatal deaths with singleton cephalic presentation and birthweight of 2500 g or more in which traumatic cranial or cervical spine injury or substantial difficulty at delivery of the head was a dominant feature. DESIGN: Review of freestyle summary reports and standard questionnaire responses submitted to the national secretariat for the Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Death in Infancy (CESDI) during the 1994/1995 intrapartum-related mortality enquiry following regional multidisciplinary panel review. SETTING: United Kingdom. SAMPLE: Of the 873 cases of intrapartum-related deaths reported in the 1994-1995 national enquiry, 709 weighed more than 2499 g. REPORTS: from 181 (89 from 1994 and 92 from 1995) with a chance of meeting criteria for cranial or cervical trauma as significant contributors to death were examined in detail. Thirty-seven were judged to meet the criteria stated in the objectives (23 from 1994 and 14 from 1995) and form the basis for this review. METHODS: Electronic and hand search of CESDI records relating to intrapartum-related deaths. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intrapartum events and features of care. RESULTS: There was evidence of fetal compromise present before birth in 33 of the 37 (89%) study group cases reviewed. One delivery was performed vaginally without instrumentation, and in one there was no attempt at vaginal delivery before caesarean section (CS) in the second stage of labour. Twenty-four cases (65%) were delivered vaginally and 11 (30%) by CS after failure to deliver vaginally with instruments. A single instrument was used in six cases of vaginal delivery (four ventouse and two Kjelland's forceps). At least two separate attempts with different instruments were made in 24 cases. Overall, the ventouse was used in 27 cases and forceps in 29 cases. In six cases, three separate attempts were made with at least two different instruments, all of which included use of ventouse. The grade of operator was recorded in 27 cases. Of these, a consultant obstetrician was present at only one delivery and no consultant was recorded to have made the first attempt to deliver a baby. In six cases, shoulder dystocia was also reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a lower incidence of death from difficult cephalic delivery and cranial trauma than previously reported. The CESDI studies were believed to have achieved high levels of ascertainment for all intrapartum-related deaths from which the cases reported here were selected. Strictly applied entry criteria used in this study could have restricted the number of cases considered as could limited in vivo or postmortem investigations and lack of detailed autopsy. When cranial traumatic injury was observed, it was almost always associated with physical difficulty at delivery and the use of instruments. The use of ventouse as the primary or only instrument did not prevent this outcome. Some injuries occurred apparently without evidence of unreasonable force, but poorly judged persistence with attempts at vaginal delivery in the presence of failure to progress or signs of fetal compromise were the main contributory factor regardless of which instruments were used.

Apgar Score↗
PubMed1999

Rotational versus nonrotational forceps: maternal and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with rotations performed with Leff forceps in comparison with nonrotational forceps deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: A review of 267 rotational and nonrotational forceps deliveries from August 1996 through February 1998 was performed. Multiple maternal and neonatal outcome measures were compared and results were analyzed by chi(2) with the Fisher exact test and the Student t test. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three traditional low-forceps or outlet forceps deliveries were compared with 104 rotational forceps deliveries performed with Leff forceps. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in maternal age, gestational age, gravidity, parity, total labor duration, birth weight, and Apgar scores. There were significantly lower rates of episiotomy, third- and fourth-degree lacerations, and sulcus lacerations in the rotation group, and the second stage of labor was also shorter. The neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was higher in the rotation group; however, none of the admissions were directly related to the mode of delivery. CONCLUSION: Rotational deliveries performed with Leff forceps are associated with less maternal morbidity and shorter second stage of labor than are deliveries performed with traditional forceps. Leff forceps are a safe option for rotation of the persistent occipitoposterior fetal position.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

How competent are you (or your staff) with shoulder dystocia?

Shoulder dystocia-when the fetal head retracts or recoils against the maternal perineum ("turtle sign") and external rotation is not accomplished-occurs in approximately 1 of every 200 deliveries. It's often diagnosed after the emergence of the fetal head when delivery is prevented by impaction of the fetal shoulders within or above the maternal pelvis. When it occurs, shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1998

Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the fetal injury rate associated with shoulder dystocia and to determine whether there is a higher rate of brachial plexus injury or bone fracture when fetal manipulation techniques are required for delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 285 cases of shoulder dystocia that occurred between January 1991 and December 1995 was performed. The type, sequence, and combination of obstetric maneuvers used to relieve the shoulder dystocia were noted. These cases were divided into two groups, as follows: (1) those resolved with McRoberts' maneuver, suprapubic pressure, or proctoepisiotomy or a combination of these and (2) those that required the addition of direct fetal manipulative maneuvers (Woods, posterior arm, or Zavanelli). Fetal injury was defined as the occurrence of brachial plexus palsy, clavicular fracture, humeral fracture, or fetal death caused by asphyxial complications. RESULTS: The fetal injury rate was 24.9% (71/285), including 48 (16.8%) brachial plexus palsies, 27 (9.5%) clavicular fractures, and 12 (4.2%) humeral fractures. Sixteen infants had both nerve injury and bone fracture. Four (8.9%) brachial plexus palsies had documented persistence at 1 year of follow-up. One neonatal death occurred at age 3 months after an episode of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. The incidence of bone fracture was not higher when direct fetal manipulation was required: 21 of 127 (16.5%) versus 18 of 158 (11.4%), p = 0.21. The incidence of brachial plexus palsy was also similar in both groups (27/127 vs 21/158, p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Direct fetal manipulation techniques used to alleviate shoulder dystocia are not associated with an increased rate of bone fracture or brachial plexus injury.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Episiotomy versus fetal manipulation in managing severe shoulder dystocia: a comparison of outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: In severe shoulder dystocia, when initial maneuvers fail, either episiotomy or fetal manipulation (Rubin, Woods' screw, or posterior arm release) is recommended. We sought to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between severe shoulder dystocia deliveries managed with episiotomy versus fetal manipulation. STUDY DESIGN: We identified severe shoulder dystocia deliveries from three databases: all shoulder dystocia deliveries (1993-2003 and 1994-1997) from two teaching institutions and litigated cases of shoulder dystocia-associated permanent brachial plexus palsy from multiple U.S. institutions. Pair-wise comparisons were made among three groups of deliveries: those managed by fetal manipulation without episiotomy (fetal manipulation-only), those managed by episiotomy without fetal manipulation (episiotomy-only), and those managed with both (episiotomy + fetal manipulation). Rates of brachial plexus palsy, neonatal depression, and anal sphincter trauma were compared among groups using chi 2 , with significance at P < .05. RESULTS: Among episiotomy-only, 13 of 22 (59.1%) sustained brachial plexus palsy, compared with 20 of 57 (35.1%) among fetal manipulation-only (P = .05). Twenty-eight of 48 (58.3%) in episiotomy + fetal manipulation had brachial plexus palsy, which did not differ from episiotomy-only (P = .95) but was higher than fetal manipulation-only (P = .02), suggesting that the addition of episiotomy conferred no benefit in averting neonatal injury. Anal sphincter trauma was significantly more common among episiotomy-only and episiotomy + fetal manipulation, compared with fetal manipulation-only. CONCLUSION: In severe shoulder dystocia, if fetal manipulation can be performed without episiotomy, severe perineal trauma can be averted without incurring greater risk of brachial plexus palsy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Manual rotation of the fetal occiput: predictors of success and delivery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to define predictors of successful rotation and rate of cesarean delivery after manual rotation of the fetal occiput from occiput posterior or transverse position. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study comprised patients who underwent a trial of manual rotation of the fetal occiput from occiput posterior or occiput transverse position. Successful rotation was defined as delivery in the occiput anterior position. We examined maternal, fetal, and labor characteristics as predictors of both fetal position at delivery and cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Multiparity (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-3.8) and maternal age < 35 years (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4) were associated with successful manual rotation of the fetal occiput. After successful rotation, the cesarean delivery rate was 2%, compared with 34% if the rotation failed (P < .001). Asian ethnicity, nulliparity, age > 35 years, labor induction, and epidural usage were associated with higher rates of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: After successful manual rotation of the fetal occiput, women had lower cesarean delivery rates than women with unsuccessful rotations. Multiparity and maternal age of < 35 years were associated with more successful rotations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with two methods to extract the impacted fetal head during Cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed cases with difficult extraction of the impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between cases that were delivered by head extraction following pushing through the vagina ('push' method) and those that were delivered by the reverse breech technique ('pull' method). RESULTS: We reviewed 3105 Cesarean section reports. Difficult extraction necessitating the 'push' or 'pull' methods was noted in 48 (1.5%) instances. Women that were delivered by the 'pull' method had significantly lower rate of postpartum fever (5% versus 46%; odds ratios, 0.06; 95% confidence intervals, 0.007-0.51) and extensions of the uterine incision (15% versus 50%; odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.74) compared to those that were delivered by the 'push' method. Neonatal outcomes were good in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: In cases with difficult extraction of the impacted fetal head during Cesarean section, 'pull' method may result in lower maternal morbidity compared to the traditional 'push' method.

Adult↗