PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “benign prostatic hyperplasia”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Validity of the "bother score" in the evaluation and treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition that is common among older men. It causes a variety of clinically significant lower urinary tract signs and symptoms. BPH is rarely life-threatening; the decision to seek treatment is frequently based on the degree to which patients find the symptoms bothersome and disruptive of daily activities. Recently developed reliable and valid outcome measures to evaluate treatments for BPH are clinical tools that urologists can use to determine the extent of bother and make treatment decisions. A single question used to determine the "bother score" provides a widely used and statistically valid measure of the need for treatment of BPH. Validation data support the argument that the bother score is a statistically reliable measure of treatment outcome in patients with BPH who view their symptoms as bothersome.

Journal Article↗

Clinical evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common neoplastic condition afflicting men and constitutes a major factor impacting male health. Clinical evaluation to assess the presence and degree of voiding dysfunction and/or the role of BPH in its presence has an increasingly broad spectrum of treatment goals. The goals of the evaluation of such men are to identify the patient's voiding or, more appropriately, urinary tract problems, both symptomatic and physiologic; to establish the etiologic role of BPH in these problems; to evaluate the necessity for and probability of success and risks of various therapeutic approaches; and to present the results of these assessments to the patient so he can make an informed decision about management recommendations and available alternatives.

Journal Article↗

Clinical evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common neoplastic condition afflicting men and constitutes a major factor impacting male health. Clinical evaluation to assess the presence and degree of voiding dysfunction and/or the role of BPH in its presence has an increasingly broad spectrum of treatment goals. The goals of the evaluation of such men are to identify the patient's voiding or, more appropriately, urinary tract problems, both symptomatic and physiologic; to establish the etiologic role of BPH in these problems; to evaluate the necessity for and probability of success and risks of various therapeutic approaches; and to present the results of these assessments to the patient so he can make an informed decision about management recommendations and available alternatives.

Journal Article↗

Benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of bladder outlet obstruction and voiding symptoms in elderly men. The pathogenesis is not fully determined but a combination of androgens and age are needed for development of BPH. Symptoms of BPH are divided into obstructive and irritative symptoms but large interpersonal variability is found and no specific BPH symptom exists. Treatment modalities include surgery (TURP, TUIP, open prostatectomy, laser ablation, balloon dilatation, hyperthermia and thermotherapy, and urethral stents) and medical therapy. TURP is the gold standard treatment and TUIP is a safe and effective alternative to TURP in patients with smaller prostates. Laser ablation, hyperthermia and thermotherapy, and urethral stents are at the present time under investigation. Balloon dilatation is FDA-approved but not often used because of low efficacy and poor long-term results. Medical treatment includes alpha-blocker or finasteride treatment and is indicated in patients with moderate to severe symptoms of BPH without a strong indication for surgery.

Humans↗

Etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common neoplastic condition that afflicts men, and it constitutes a major factor impacting the health of the American male. This article reviews voiding dysfunction and the role of aging, the testis, and androgen in the development of BPH. Emphasis is placed on new concepts in the basic aspects of BPH etiology as a result of recent investigations.

Aging↗

Efficacy of doxazosin in normotensive and hypertensive patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and hypertension are both common conditions in older men. It is estimated that 20 to 41% of middle-aged to elderly men may have both. Alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists, such doxazosin, produce significant improvements in urine flow rate and symptoms in patients with BPH. The effect of doxazosin on urine flow rate and symptoms in hypertensive men with BPH is similar to that seen in normotensive men. By contrast, doxazosin produces a significant fall in blood pressure in hypertensive men, but has minimal effect in normotensives. Doxazosin is well tolerated, irrespective of blood pressure status. Thus, it can be concluded doxazosin is an effective and well tolerated treatment for BPH which appears to have additional benefits in the management of patients with concomitant hypertension.

Aged↗

Controversies about the clinical assessment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disorder which places a considerable burden on older men and health care expenses. With advances in medical technologies and the foreseeable demographic changes in the Western world, the financial and epidemiological impact of this chronic disease is expected to increase further. The management of BPH is controversial, and this article critically reviews the clinical applicability and validity of the various measures available for assessment. Few objective modalities are indicated in the routine evaluation of BPH. There is a poor correlation between objective and subjective indicators and both measures reveal a substantial variation over time. This fluctuation is mainly attributed to the natural history of the disease. The clinical value of combining objective and subjective parameters into an analytic process seems small. Disagreements about the clinical value of BPH assessment modalities have caused inconsistent practices and consequently provision of changeable health care quality. Patients seek urological counseling and relief because of burden of illness. Quality care is provided by clinicians being perceptive to patients' preferences. Provision of quality care does not inevitably generate increasing health service expenses.

Humans↗

[Evaluation of symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of voiding dysfunction in elderly men. With the age related demographic changes in the western world, the epidemiological and economical burden of BPH is anticipated to increase. BPH is clinically diagnosed on a variety of more or less well defined symptomatic, macroscopical, and physiological criteria, whereas the histological diagnosis is straightforward. Yet, no symptom is specific for BPH and numerous other diseases have to be considered when a patient presents with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction. A BPH questionnaire is useful when weighing the pros and cons for intervention. Furthermore, a symptom index represents a valuable indicator for the quality of care provided. Through the last decades a number of BPH questionnaires have been introduced. This article scrutinizes various BPH indices and provides an introduction to the prerequisites of clinical questionnaires.

Aged↗

[Pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is primarily a anatomical diagnosis. The prepubertal weight of the gland is about 1.6 g and at the end of the third decade around 20 g. With histological evidence for BPH there is an increase of weight and volume with aging. The human prostate is divided into zones which form, however, a fairly regular gland. The prostate is organized similar to a grape, these parts are surrounded with the epithelial cells which express different compounds and proteins and finally disappear by apoptosis. The stromal compartment is kind of a skeleton, both compartments (epithelial and stromal part) present manifold interactions based on androgens, androgen receptors and growth factors.

Adolescent↗

Benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common problem in men over 50, causing unpleasant symptoms. This Update examines the range of treatments now available, including traditional interventions and modern techniques.

Humans↗

Role of growth factors in benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition among older men. Although surgery is the most effective treatment for patients with severe symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction, many patients with less severe symptoms will benefit from pharmacological intervention. Traditional medical therapies have involved hormonal manipulation. However, evidence has now emerged that prostate growth is under the immediate control of specific growth factors and only indirectly modulated by steroids. In this review we present a hypothesis of the mechanism of action of these growth factors in the developmental of BPH. Many of the more bothersome symptoms of BPH are not directly caused by the outlet obstruction, but only the resulting bladder hypertrophy. The development of the rabbit model of partial bladder outlet obstruction has allowed investigation of the bladder changes likely to occur in BPH. These studies have revealed the important role of growth factors in the development of bladder hypertrophy. Therefore, targeting growth factors potentially represents a direct therapeutic approach to the regulation of abnormal enlargement of the prostate and the amelioration of other symptoms associated with BPH.

Animals↗

Association of vitamin D receptor and 17 hydroxylase gene polymorphisms with benign prostatic hyperplasia and benign prostatic enlargement.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether polymorphisms in 17 hydroxylase (CYP17) and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genes have an association to prostate volume/histology and endocrine patterns in elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS: Elderly men with LUTS underwent the following investigations: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assessment of prostate volume, and an endocrine study. Polymorphisms of CYP17 (T-->C substitution in the 5' promoter region) and VDR (T1055C) genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction-length polymorphism analysis, using DNA from peripheral white blood cells. Clinical and endocrine parameters and the prostate stroma/epithelial ratio were correlated to CYP17 and VDR genotypes. RESULTS: A total of 148 (mean +/- SD, 67.0 +/- 9.7 years) patients were analyzed. IPSS (17.8 +/- 7.0), prostate volume (41.9 +/- 17.9 cc), maximum flow rate (10.9 +/- 5.8 mL/s), and PSA (4.7 +/- 4.7 ng/mL) indicate a typical LUTS population. Mean endocrine levels were consistently within age-specific reference values. Neither CYP17 nor VDR gene polymorphisms revealed an association to prostate size, PSA, clinical parameters, and endocrine parameters. Men who had the A1/A1 CYP17 genotype had on average a greater stromal/epithelial ratio than men with the A1/A2 or A2/A2 genotypes, yet after adjusting for multiple testing, this significance disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: Gene polymorphisms of CYP17 and VDR have no association to prostate volume, clinical parameters, and endocrine parameters in elderly men. The association of CYP17 polymorphism and prostate histology warrants further studies. Assessment of gene polymorphisms might provide new insights into the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia and benign prostate enlargement and may hold promise as genetic biomarkers of this disease.

Aged↗

[Effectivity of phytotherapeutic agent prostavit for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia].

Benign prostate hyperplasion's treatment with phytotherapic agent Prostavit and its results are described. Twenty patients who took Prostavit for 8 weeks were managed and treated. No patients were treated with placebo. Subjective and objective improvement was noticed with Prostavit, starting 6th week. Worsening of symptoms or allergical reaction was not noticed in all patients during this period.

Adult↗

High rates of prostate-specific antigen testing in men with evidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is common among men who may be candidates for prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Patterns of PSA testing among men with evidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia have not been studied. METHODS: We examined the prevalence and correlates of a self-reported history of PSA testing. In 1994, 33,028 US health professionals without prostate cancer aged 47 to 85 years provided information on prior PSA testing, lower urinary tract symptoms characteristic of benign prostatic hyperplasia, history of prostatectomy, and prostate cancer risk factors. In 1995, a subset of 7,070 men provided additional information on diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. RESULTS: From 39% of men in their 50s to 53% of men in their 80s reported PSA testing in the prior year (P <0.0001 for trend with age). Men were more likely to report PSA testing if they had lower urinary tract symptoms characteristic of benign prostatic hyperplasia (age-adjusted odds ratio for severe symptoms 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 2.6), a prior history of prostatectomy (age-adjusted odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.2), or a physician diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.2; adjusted for age, signs or symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer risk factors). CONCLUSIONS: These US health professionals reported preferential use of PSA testing among men least likely to benefit from early cancer detection (older men) and among men most likely to have a false-positive PSA result (men with benign prostatic hyperplasia). Physician and patient education are needed to promote more rational and selective use of this screening test.

Aged↗

Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of Serenoa repens in the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were searched in computerized general and specialized databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Phytodok), by checking bibliographies, and by contacting manufacturers and researchers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were eligible if they (1) randomized men with BPH to receive preparations of Serenoa repens (alone or in combination) in comparison with placebo or other BPH medications, and (2) included clinical outcomes such as urologic symptom scales, symptoms, or urodynamic measurements. Eligibility was assessed by at least two independent observers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information on patients, interventions, and outcomes was extracted by at least two independent reviewers using a standard form. The main outcome measure for comparing the effectiveness of Serenoa repens with placebo or other BPH medications was the change in urologic symptom scale scores. Secondary outcomes included changes in nocturia and urodynamic measures. The main outcome measure for side effects was the number of men reporting side effects. MAIN RESULTS: 2939 men from18 randomized trials lasting 4 to 48 weeks were assessed. 16 trials were double-blinded and treatment allocation concealment was adequate in 9 studies. Compared with placebo, Serenoa repens improved urinary symptom scores, symptoms, and urinary flow measures. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for the urinary symptom score was -1.41 points (scale range 0-19), (95%CI = -2.52, -0.30, n = 1 study) and the risk ratio (RR) for self rated improvement was 1.75 (95%CI = 1.21, 2.54, n = 6 studies). The WMD for nocturia was -0.76 times per evening (95%CI = -1.22, -0.32; n = 10 studies). The WMD for peak urine flow was 1.93 ml/sec (95%CI = 0.72, 3.14, n = 8 studies). Compared with finasteride, Serenoa repens produced similar improvements in urinary symptom scores (WMD = 0.37 IPSS points (scale range 0-35), 95%CI = -0.45, 1.19, n = 2 studies) and peak urine flow (WMD = -0.74 ml/sec, 95%CI = -1.66, 0.18, n = 2 studies). Adverse effects due to Serenoa repens were mild and infrequent. Withdrawal rates in men assigned to placebo, Serenoa repens or finasteride were 7%, 9%, and 11%, respectively. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that Serenoa repens improves urologic symptoms and flow measures compared with placebo. Serenoa repens produced similar improvement in urinary symptoms and flow compared to finasteride and is associated with fewer adverse treatment events. The long term effectiveness, safety and ability to prevent BPH complications are not known.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Natural history of benign prostate hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Benign prostate hyperplasia is one of the most common diseases affecting the health of the aging males. Watchful waiting is an acceptable management strategy for benign prostate hyperplasia in which the patient is monitored by the physician but receives no active intervention. The epidemiological data on this are lacking in China. Our study was designed to evaluate the changes of signs and symptoms of patients with benign prostate hyperplasia during management by watchful waiting in China. METHODS: One hundred and forty-five patients with benign prostate hyperplasia aged > 50 years were enrolled in management by watchful waiting. All the patients were visited every 6 months and were given an International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life questionnaire to complete. They also had uroflowmetry and were assessed using ultrasonography to get the volume of prostate, transition zone and amount of residual urine. The Student's t test, the Chi-square test, and variance analysis were used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: All patients were visited after 6 months, the mean volume of transitional zone was found to have increased by 1.6 ml (P < 0.01), International Prostate Symptom Score was increased by 0.8 (P < 0.01) and Quality of Life was increased by 0.2 (P < 0.01), and there was no statistical change in other data. Among these patients, 17.9% (26/145) visited again after 12 months when the data failed to show a statistically significant difference among the three groups (0, 6, and 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: After one year's follow-up, the progression of benign prostate hyperplasia was slow and the clinical data did not undergo much change.

Aged↗

A preliminary study of JM-27: a serum marker that can specifically identify men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a common disease in men that until recently was considered a single disease with varying symptoms. Our recent analysis has revealed that a molecular marker, JM-27, is able to distinguish at the tissue level between highly symptomatic individuals and those with histological disease. The goal of these studies was to determine if a serum based assay to detect JM-27 could distinguish men with different forms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A serum based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was developed using a novel anti-JM-27 monoclonal antibody. The assay was sensitive, detecting JM-27 at the low ng/ml level within the serum. A quantitative measurement of serum JM-27 levels was performed in 68 patients. The patients consisted of 3 groups of 29 patients with asymptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (American Urological Association symptom score of 15 or less), 39 with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (American Urological Association symptom score 16 to 32) and 17 with confirmed prostate cancer. The assay cutoff was determined after a pilot run of samples and applied prospectively. RESULTS: Using the determined cutoff, serum levels of JM-27 can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic patient sets. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay are 90% and 77%, respectively. The presence of prostate cancer in these men does not appear to alter the marker levels. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is believed to represent the first characterization of a serum based marker for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗

Metabolic factors associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

CONTEXT: Benign prostatic hyperplasia poses a significant public health problem, but its etiology remains unclear. Obesity and associated abnormalities in glucose homeostasis may play a role in benign prostatic hyperplasia development by influencing prostate growth. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether obesity, fasting plasma glucose concentration, and diabetes are associated with radiologically determined prostate enlargement, an objective measure of benign prostatic hyperplasia. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional analysis with robust variance estimates to account for multiple measures over time in the same individuals. SETTING: This prospective cohort study was composed of community volunteers. PATIENTS: Patients studied were 422 adult men enrolled in The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Total prostate volume as determined by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was measured. RESULTS: Among 422 participants, 91 (21.6%) had prostate enlargement (defined as total prostate volume >/= 40 cc) at first visit. Compared with men of normal weight [body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m(2)], the age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for prostate enlargement for overweight men (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) was 1.41 (95% CI, 0.84-2.37), for obese men (BMI, 30-34 kg/m(2)) was 1.27 (95% CI, 0.68-2.39), and for severely obese men (BMI >/= 35 kg/m(2)) was 3.52 (95% CI, 1.45-8.56) (P = 0.01). Men with elevated fasting glucose (>110 mg/dl) were more likely to have an enlarged prostate than men with normal fasting glucose (</=110 mg/dl) (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.70-5.23), as were men with a diagnosis of diabetes (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.23-4.11). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, elevated fasting plasma glucose, and diabetes are risk factors for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Adult↗