PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “multidisciplinary team”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

The mother-baby relationship in the event of extreme prematurity: intervention possibilities within a multidisciplinary team.

The purpose of this study is to consider the intervention possibilities within a multidisciplinary medical team during the hospitalization of extremely preterm infants. In this work, the interventions were carried out with the objective of establishing communication among the various parties involved, mother, infant and multidisciplinary team, by approaching and trying to understand the mother in the diverse moments of hospitalization of preterm infants.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Multidisciplinary teams in health care: lessons from oncology and renal teams.

An indepth study conducted on units treating renal disease and cancer clinics determined that multidisciplinary teams are relatively commonplace in these areas. Developing four team organizational structures--sequential, primary, nucleus and dynamic--the authors hypothesize that each varies on a continuum in terms of how highly structured they are. The framework suggests that the ideology of equal participation on the team is the most difficult to sustain, and that difficulties typically arise as organization requirements become more complex. More research seems to be indicated to develop a comprehensive organizational framework, and the probable effect of organizational form on team performance. One of the key issues addressed is team leadership.

Canada↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical indicators of treatment futility and imminent terminal decline as discussed by multidisciplinary teams in long-term care.

Focus group methodology was used to describe how members of multidisciplinary teams in long-term care facilities recognize when residents are approaching end-stage disease, document evidence that associated treatment futility has occurred, and convey this information to the residents, each other, and family members. In addition to the typical clinical indicators of treatment futility found in the literature (e.g., recurrent infections, weight loss, falls, functional decline), team members described a set of physical and affective changes that were apparent to them as their residents approached trajectories of imminent terminal decline. While more difficult to quantify and measure, these other indicators have a significant impact on the ways that team members assess and interpret a person's survival potential. Using these indicators of both treatment failure and imminent decline requires knowledge of a resident's history, clinical condition, course of care, and individual idiosyncrasies. Together, the indicators offer important cues that are needed for the identification of persons who might benefit from earlier transitions to palliative care.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1998

The importance of the case management approach: perceptions of multidisciplinary team members.

This article attempts to determine the importance of the case management approach as perceived by health professionals working in multidisciplinary teams. The case management approach is reported to streamline care and contain cost. The literature calls for continuing education in a multidisciplinary forum for all health professions; however, data on perceived or actual educational needs is scant. One hundred forty-one health practitioners working in clinical teams rated four case management components on 100 mm scales: assessing patient needs; educating caregivers; community agency liaison; and, cost monitoring. Statistical significance of differences was determined by Mann Whitney U and Wilcoxon rank sum testing. All scores were high, and of all variables tested, varied only by profession (p < .01). Administrators and nurses had relatively higher scores than physicians and physiotherapists. Patient needs were valued above education, education above liaison, and liaison above cost monitoring (p < .01, < .01, < .01, respectively). Continuing education providers should note that health professionals value case management and may be receptive to education. Further study is required to design educational modules for multidisciplinary use, test impact on knowledge and skills, and determine if transdisciplinary case management education can improve quality of care while containing costs.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2005

The informational roles and psychological health of members of 10 oncology multidisciplinary teams in the UK.

We report here the different roles undertaken by the members of 10 multidisciplinary cancer teams in conveying information to patients during their care. Team members completed an Informational Roles Questionnaire measuring an individual's perception of their major role and that of their colleagues in giving information to patients. They also completed two standard psychological health measures, the General Health Questionnaire and Maslach Burnout Inventory. The information giving roles of the surgeon, oncologist, radiologist and clinical nurse specialist were well recognised by their colleagues; however, other team members' roles were more ambiguous and less well understood. The clinical nurse specialist provided the broadest information coverage for patients. Few professional groups regularly informed patients about clinical trials and family history and the clinical nurse specialist was often the only person to deal with patients' sexual well being, consequently these areas are likely to receive poor coverage. Probable psychiatric morbidity (GHQ> or =4) in teams ranged from 5 to 27%. High levels of emotional exhaustion were particularly apparent in team leaders and nurses and feelings of low levels of personal accomplishment were prevalent in the histopathologists and radiologists. Putative benefits to patients and healthcare professionals from multidisciplinary team working may not be realised without investment in team training.

Burnout, Professional↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Assessment of activity of care of a nutritional support multidisciplinary team in the follow-up of total parenteral nutrition].

INTRODUCTION: In total parenteral nutrition (TPN) nutritional support multidisciplinary teams (NSMT) must provide a high quality nutritional assistance based on evidence and daily follow-up of patients with TPN. OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree of adherence to quality standards of care provided to patients on TPN by the NSMT in two consecutive annual periods, according to structure, procedure, and outcomes indicators, previously defined in the team working protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study of all patients that received TPN at our Center (421-bed general teaching hospital) during the years 2002 and 2003, using the data introduced in NUTRIDATA by daily follow-up of clinical and analytical conditions, and nutritional and non-nutritional complications, comparing both periods and considering an statistical significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-three patients and 145 patients received TPN during 2002 and 2003(65.9% male), respectively, with similar parameters of gender, age, indications for TPN, baseline nutritional status, mean nutritional supply, and non-nutritional complications. As to the different quality indicators established in the comparative study, we found a significant improvement in 2003 vs. 2002 in relation to initial anthropometrical assessment (71.03% vs 51.53%; p < 0.001), initial biochemical assessment (97.93% vs. 92.63%; p < 0.04), performance of systematic monitoring analysis (84.83% vs. 71.78%; p < 0.01), hypernatremia incidence (8.27% vs. 15.34%; p = 0.05) and moderate hyperphosphatemia (26.89% vs. 40.49%; p < 0.02), TPN ending for clinical improve- ment (76.60% vs. 64.40%; p = 0.04), and reduction of days on TPN (15.74 +/- 20.43 vs. 11.88 +/- 8.34; p < 0.02), the impaired electrolyte levels significantly improving as a whole. We also observed a non-significant trend towards an improvement of adequacy of TPN indications, hyperphosphatemia, severe hypophosphatemia, total stay, and post-surgical stay, in 2003 vs. 2002. CONCLUSIONS: The NSMT experience shows that analysis of indicators based on quality standards, in two successive annual periods allows assessing the improvement of efficiency of nutritional intervention in hospital-admitted patients with TPN with regards to indication, assessment, follow-up, and course.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Improving patient and carer communication, multidisciplinary team working and goal-setting in stroke rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which three forms of multidisciplinary team (MDT) care in stroke rehabilitation meet the standards set by the United Kingdom National Service Framework (NSF). DESIGN: Consecutive assessment of the three forms of care was completed. SUBJECTS: The study included three groups of 25 stroke inpatients on the stroke rehabilitation ward. INTERVENTION: (1) A standard weekly MDT meeting using a standard form for documentation; (2) a standard MDT meeting using a newly devised form; and (3) a novel MDT ward round using the new form, and attended by doctors. RESULTS: MDT ward rounds result in significantly better consideration of patients' needs (median 7 per patient compared with 0 and 5 in phases one and two), enhanced SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time framed) goal-setting (median 3 per patient compared to 1 in phases one and two); greater patient involvement (12 patients compared to 0 and 4 in phases one and two); and improved team working (measured using the team climate inventory) than do MDT meetings. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, standard weekly MDT meetings did not meet the standards set for MDT care by the NSF. The use of a MDT ward round allows these standards to be achieved.

Aged↗
PubMed1979

Management of primary bladder cancer by a multidisciplinary team.

Results of management of a closed series of primary bladder carcinoma over a 20-year period by a multidisciplinary team are presented. Patients were classified by the TNM method before treatment. These experiences indicate that stage and grade are relevant to prognosis and treatment. The TNM classification can be precise and practical when used diligently by a treatment team. Although no new methods of treatment are offered, the treatment now available may be utilized to better effect if programmed to allow care of the patients by a team, especially if the team explores the limits of radiation and surgery in their hands.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Bariatric surgery: early results with a multidisciplinary team.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery depends on complete preoperative study of morbid obesity, in order to obtain the treatment of choice. A multidisciplinary group was founded in 1998 at the University of Siena. METHODS: During 1998, 16 patients, with median weight 121.8 +/- 31 kg and median body mass index (BMI) 43 +/- 6, underwent bariatric surgery. A multidisciplinary assessment was used in order to evaluate psychological status, food intake problems and patient compliance, and hemodynamic, respiratory, metabolic and arthritic functions. 13 patients were submitted to laparoscopic surgery: in 11 adjustable gastric banding was performed and 2 were submitted to a vertical gastroplasty plus adjustable gastric banding. Three patients were operated via traditional laparotomy, due to previous abdominal surgery in 2 cases (submitted to an adjustable gastric banding) and one woman was submitted to a bilio-intestinal bypass according to the Hallberg technique, for her psychiatric troubles and coexisting systolic hypertension and uncontrolled diabetes. Monthly follow-up for each patient continues after 6 months. RESULTS: No morbidity or mortality has occurred. The median weight loss at three months, was 19.5 kg. Two cases required injection of 1 ml more of fluid into the port, respectively at 4 and 9 months. Fifteen days after surgery, seven patients (46%) had vomiting episodes, due to rapid food intake. All patients have shown an improvement of their comorbidities after surgery. CONCLUSION: Early results via the multidisciplinary team and laparoscopic banding have been satisfactory thus far.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Multidisciplinary team dynamics in the production of problem-based-learning cases in issues related to older adults.

Two important goals in allied health education are to prepare future allied health professionals to function as members of interdisciplinary teams and to increase their awareness of issues related to the growing older adult population. The responsibility for achieving these goals rests on the faculty and administrators of allied health education programs, who may not themselves be proficient in either of these domains. A multidisciplinary team of health educators and administrators was brought together to produce six problem-based learning (PBL) cases related to older adults. Members of the team represented a variety of disciplines in health care, diverse philosophies of educational development, a variety of roles in allied health education, and differing levels of knowledge of issues related to older adults--parameters similar to those found in the members of an interdisciplinary healthcare team. The methods by which this multidisciplinary group functioned and the dynamics in attaining the goals of the project are presented.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Teaching the multidisciplinary team approach in a geriatrics miniresidency.

The miniresidency program in geriatrics begun in 1985 at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine acquaints practicing health professionals with a multidisciplinary team approach to the care of geriatric patients. The two-week program features participation in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic, home visits, social work and nutrition consultations, and conferences with patients and families. Miniresidency members also participate in neurologic and neuropsychological evaluations and attend day care for demented adults. The 71 health professionals who completed the program during its first 20 months showed significant improvement on their scores between the pre- and posttests: the mean of all scores in the pretest was 51 out of a possible 80 (SD 15); the mean of all scores in the posttest was 75 out of a possible 80 (SD 4); p less than .001. The 77% who returned post-program evaluation questionnaires found the program "useful" or "very useful."

Geriatrics↗
PubMed1995

A critical reappraisal of a social form in psychiatric care settings: the multidisciplinary team meeting as a paradigm case.

Critical analysis can be used to examine potential inequalities and interferences with freedom in psychiatric nursing contexts. Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) evoke a sense of egalitarian multiparty cooperation, when underlying philosophical, ideological assumptions and realities can operate to contradict consciously held beliefs. Traditional approaches toward structural aspects of organizations are built on several conventional and taken-for-granted assumptions. Deconstruction and critical analysis can create alternate ways of thinking about fixed aspects of practice. The MDTM can be analyzed through different images. Underlying realities about the disempowerment of nurses and patients in the team structure can be shown through such analysis.

Culture↗
PubMed2006

Multidisciplinary team working: collaboration and conflict.

The aim of this paper is to report on findings identifying some of the difficulties encountered by the multidisciplinary team in the development and implementation of a care pathway for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Policy direction has shifted towards greater team working and blurring of professional boundaries. Moreover, there is greater need to deliver care according to set standards and for patients to reach particular outcomes of care. Care pathways are relatively new for psychiatry and will potentially uncover tensions within the team. Data were collected by participant observation and semistructured interviews over a period of 12 months on an acute psychiatric unit. The care team developed the care pathway and the process of development and implementation was observed through action research. Cross-sectional indexing was used to analyse the data, and themes were developed using interview and observational data collection methods. Clinicians argued strongly for clear role boundaries but also defended their perceived control over health care from other professions. The findings indicate that designing a care pathway for people with schizophrenia may produce conflicting perceptions from the team. Conflict may arise through professions being unwilling to accept plurality over roles, which may hinder progress in meeting the needs of patients. The findings also counter the impression that care pathways can be implemented with little impact on the team.

Conflict, Psychological↗
PubMed1988

Multidisciplinary team evaluation of school dysfunction. An analysis of utilization.

Little is known of the characteristics of children experiencing school dysfunction who are evaluated by multidisciplinary teams. The records of 87 children seen during a calendar year were reviewed and information was gathered regarding their age, sex, and referral source. In addition, the chief concerns of the child's parents and educators, and the diagnostic outcome, were considered. Boys were more likely to have been referred for behavioral problems than for academic issues. Girls were seen at an earlier age. Younger children were more likely to have been referred by physicians. While there was a significant association between gender and reason for referral, we found no such relationship between gender and final diagnostic classification. Variables in the utilization of evaluation services are described. Cognizance of these issues should lead to improved provision of care to all children experiencing school dysfunction.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Behavior modification of chronic pain: a treatment program by a multidisciplinary team.

A treatment program for chronic pain is reported which focuses on modification of patient pain behavior. After an outpatient pain clinic screening by a multidisciplinary team, the patient with chronic pain (duration of 6 months or longer) is admitted for a 7--8 week inpatient program followed by a 4-week outpatient period. The first week of the inpatient program is used for evaluation of pain behaviors, recording use of pain medications, activity levels, and tolerance for special conditioning exercises. The program is aimed at extinguishing pain behaviors and use of pain medications, increasing activity level, reinforcing well behaviors, and returning patients to full active lives, normal for their sex and age. Of the 34 patients completing the program and returning to full active normal lives, 74% (25) have maintained this attained goal at the time of follow-up from 6 months to 7 years later.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The impact of structuring multidisciplinary team conferences mediated by ICT in the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases.

Communication processes are pervasive in the daily practice of health professionals. Reorganizing these daily practices by introducing ICT, inevitably effects one or more communication processes. Understanding exactly what these effects are, is a major problem in designing and implementing ICT-applications. In this paper we present an analysis of these effects, based on a theory of communication processes. The concept of 'decoupling' is pivotal in our analysis. Based on the identified effects, and some preconditions that have to be met in order for these effects to take place, we derive a number of guidelines for reorganizing communication processes by means of applying ICT. The application of these quidelines will be demonstrated and discussed in the context of the reorganization of a team conference at the Rehabilitation Clinic of the Rheumatology Department of the Leiden University Medical Center (RCRD/LUMC), a multidisciplinary team care setting.

Health Personnel↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Contribution of multidisciplinary team to pain management.

A fundamental part of satisfactory acute pain management is the regular and objective assessment of the patient's pain. The responsibility for this ongoing assessment is generally incorporated into the nursing role. Given the multidisciplinary nature of modern health care it is contended that this assessment is not the sole obligation of nursing or medical staff and that any healthcare professional who is offering treatment of therapy to patients should incorporate pain assessment into their treatment plan. This article outlines a small research study that assesses the contribution that the multidisciplinary team (MDT) makes towards pain management and pain assessment in particular. It highlights the importance of pain assessment and the fact that management is a multidisciplinary issue.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗