SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “randomized crossover trial”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Technology choice, glycemic control and patient-reported outcome measures in adults with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial comparing a smart insulin pen with an automated insulin delivery system (EBIACE-1).

AIMS: To compare glycemic outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between smart insulin pens (SIP) and an automated insulin delivery (AID) system in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D), and to identify individuals able to maintain near-optimal glycemic control using SIP. METHODS: EBIACE-1 was a randomized, open-label, crossover trial including 31 adults with T1D. Participants received SIP (InPen™) and AID (MiniMed™ 780G) for 6 months each. Co-primary outcomes were time in range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL) and HbA1c. Treatment effects were assessed using longitudinal models in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Predictors of near-optimal glycemic control with SIP were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: AID improved glycemic control versus SIP, with higher TIR (81 % vs 66 %; +15 %, 95 % CI 10-19; P < 0.001) and lower HbA1c (6.9 % [52 mmol/mol] vs 7.3 % [56 mmol/mol]; -0.4 %, 95 % CI - 0.6 to - 0.3; P < 0.001). Near-optimal glycemic control with SIP was achieved by 12 of 26 participants (46 %). In exploratory analyses, higher baseline diabetes-related life interference was associated with a lower probability of achieving this outcome. CONCLUSIONS: AID provides superior glycemic control, although nearly half of participants achieved near-optimal control with SIP, supporting a personalized approach to technology selection.

Adult↗

PubMed1983

Double-blind randomized crossover trial of verapamil and propranolol in chronic stable angina.

Propranolol (240 mg daily) and verapamil (360 mg daily) were objectively compared for their respective efficacy in the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris. Twenty-two patients were studied in a randomized placebo controlled, double-blind crossover trial with 4 weeks on each active drug treatment. Multistage treadmill exercise with computer-assisted ECG analysis was performed after 2 weeks on placebo and at the end of each 4-week active drug treatment. The mean exercise time to produce angina was 5.5 minutes (SEM +/- 0.4 minutes) on placebo and this increased to 7.8 (+/- 0.5) minutes on propranolol and 9.1 (+/- 0.5) minutes on verapamil. The improvement in exercise time of verapamil over propranolol was statistically significant (p less than 0.01). Ten patients became free of angina with verapamil and four with propranolol. Resting and maximal exercise heart rates were significantly reduced by propranolol; verapamil did not reduce the maximal heart rate but reduced the resting heart rate slightly. However, the heart rate increase per minute of exercise was significantly diminished (p less than 0.001). ST segment changes showed improvement with both drugs despite marked differences in heart rate profile. The overall efficacy of the slow calcium channel blocker, verapamil, compares favorably with that of a standard beta-adrenoreceptor blocking drug (propranolol), thus providing a new perspective in the management of angina pectoris. These two classes of drugs seem to act by different mechanisms and it is suggested that if patients are resistant or intolerant to one of these drugs, the other can be used to yield a beneficial response.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Physiologic pacing in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective, randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the impact of prevention of bradycardia with physiologic pacing on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. BACKGROUND: Apneic episodes during sleep are associated with slowing of the heart rate during apnea and tachycardia with subsequent arousal. Patients with permanent pacemakers may have reduced episodes of sleep apnea when their pacemaker rate is set faster than their spontaneous nocturnal heart rate. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind crossover trial of temporary atrial pacing in obstructive sleep apnea to reduce the apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Fifteen patients (age 60 +/- 13 years, 12 men) with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (AHI 34 +/- 14) underwent insertion of an externalized atrial permanent pacing system via the left subclavian vein. Patients underwent overnight respiratory sleep studies in hospital, during atrial pacing at 75 beats/min, and with pacing turned off. The order of pacing mode was randomized, with crossover the subsequent night to the other mode. Patients were blinded to pacing mode, and the analysis of sleep recordings was blind to pacing mode. RESULTS: Pacing was tolerated without complications in all patients. Overnight physiologic pacing did not affect the AHI (pacing 39 +/- 21/h vs. control 42 +/- 21/h, p = 0.23, 95% confidence interval -9.3 to 2.5 for difference), desaturation time (pacing 3.8 +/- 6.0% vs. control 3.5 +/- 4.3%, p = 0.70), or the minimum SaO(2) (pacing 75 +/- 10% vs. control 77 +/- 11%, p = 0.38). There was a borderline significant reduction in circulatory time with pacing (pacing 23.4 +/- 3.2 s vs. control 25.5 +/- 4.4 s, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary atrial pacing does not appear to improve respiratory manifestations of obstructive sleep apnea. Permanent atrial pacing in this patient population does not appear to be justified.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Cardiovascular effects of sildenafil during exercise in men with known or probable coronary artery disease: a randomized crossover trial.

CONTEXT: The relationship between sildenafil citrate use and reported adverse cardiovascular events in men with coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cardiovascular effects of sildenafil during exercise in men with CAD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial conducted March to October 2000 at a US ambulatory-care referral center among 105 men with a mean (SD) age of 66 (9) years who had erectile dysfunction and known or highly suspected CAD. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent 2 symptom-limited supine bicycle echocardiograms separated by an interval of 1 to 3 days after receiving a single dose of sildenafil (50 or 100 mg) or placebo 1 hour before each exercise test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hemodynamic effects of sildenafil during exercise (onset, extent, and severity of ischemia) assessed by exercise echocardiography. RESULTS: Mean (SD) resting ejection fraction was 56% (7%) (range, 39%-68%). After sildenafil use, resting systolic blood pressure was reduced from 135 (19) mm Hg to 128 (17) mm Hg, for a mean change of -7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -9 to -4 mm Hg; P<.001). After placebo use, the mean (SD) change was from 135 (20) mm Hg to 133 (19) mm Hg, a difference of -2 mm Hg (95% CI, -6 to 0.3 mm Hg; P =.08). The difference between mean change after sildenafil and placebo use was 4.3 (95% CI, 0.9-7.7; P =.01). Resting heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and wall motion score index (a measure of the extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities) did not change significantly in either group. Exercise capacity was similar with sildenafil use (mean [SD], 4.5 [1.0] metabolic equivalents) and placebo use (mean [SD], 4.6 [1.0] metabolic equivalents; mean difference, 0.07; 95% CI, -.06 to 0.19; P =.29). Exercise blood pressure and heart rate increments were similar. Dyspnea or angina developed in 69 patients who took sildenafil and 70 patients who took placebo (P =.89); exercise electrocardiography was positive in 12 patients (11%) who took sildenafil and 17 patients (16%) who took placebo (P =.09). Exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities developed in similar numbers of patients after sildenafil and placebo use (84 and 86 patients, respectively; P =.53). Wall motion score index at peak exercise was similar after sildenafil and placebo use (mean [SD], 1.4 [0.4] vs 1.4 [0.4]; mean difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03; P =.40). CONCLUSION: In men with stable CAD, sildenafil had no effect on symptoms, exercise duration, or presence or extent of exercise-induced ischemia, as assessed by exercise echocardiography.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Hemodynamic and renal excretory effects of human brain natriuretic peptide infusion in patients with congestive heart failure. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacological effects of infusion of human brain natriuretic peptide (hBNP) in patients with severe congestive heart failure have not been characterized previously. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with severe congestive heart failure were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to receive incremental 90-minute infusions of hBNP (0.003, 0.01, 0.03, and 0.1 microgram/kg per minute) or placebo on 2 consecutive days. At the highest completed dose of the hBNP, mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 38.3 +/- 1.6 to 25.9 +/- 1.7 mm Hg; mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased from 25.1 +/- 1.1 to 13.2 +/- 1.3 mm Hg; mean right atrial pressure decreased from 10.9 +/- 1 to 4.8 +/- 1.0 mm Hg; mean arterial pressure decreased from 85.2 +/- 2.0 to 74.9 +/- 1.7 mm Hg; and cardiac index increased from 2.0 +/- 0.1 to 2.5 +/- 0.1 L/min per square meter (all P < .01 versus placebo). Urine volume and urine sodium excretion increased significantly during hBNP infusion when compared with placebo infusion (90 +/- 38 versus 67 +/- 27 mL/h and 2.6 +/- 2.4 versus 1.4 +/- 1.2 mEq/h, respectively, both P < .05 versus placebo), whereas creatinine clearance and urinary potassium excretion did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of incremental doses of hBNP is associated with favorable hemodynamic and natriuretic effects in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed2002

Treatment of Tourette's syndrome with Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC): a randomized crossover trial.

Anecdotal reports in Tourette's syndrome (TS) have suggested that marijuana (cannabis sativa) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), the major psychoactive ingredient of marijuana, reduce tics and associated behavioral disorders. We performed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover single-dose trial of Delta(9)-THC (5.0, 7.5 or 10.0 mg) in 12 adult TS patients. Tic severity was assessed using a self-rating scale (Tourette's syndrome Symptom List, TSSL) and examiner ratings (Shapiro Tourette's syndrome Severity Scale, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, Tourette's syndrome Global Scale). Using the TSSL, patients also rated the severity of associated behavioral disorders. Clinical changes were correlated to maximum plasma levels of THC and its metabolites 11-hydroxy-Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-THC) and 11-nor-Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THC-COOH). Using the TSSL, there was a significant improvement of tics (p=0.015) and obsessive-compulsive behavior (OCB) (p = 0.041) after treatment with Delta(9)-THC compared to placebo. Examiner ratings demonstrated a significant difference for the subscore "complex motor tics" (p = 0.015) and a trend towards a significant improvement for the subscores "motor tics" (p = 0.065), "simple motor tics" (p = 0.093), and "vocal tics" (p = 0.093). No serious adverse reactions occurred. Five patients experienced mild, transient side effects. There was a significant correlation between tic improvement and maximum 11-OH-THC plasma concentration. Results obtained from this pilot study suggest that a single-dose treatment with Delta(9)-THC is effective and safe in treating tics and OCB in TS. It can be speculated that clinical effects may be caused by 11-OH-THC. A more long-term study is required to confirm these results.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2007

Intravesical atropine compared to oral oxybutynin for neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a double-blind, randomized crossover trial.

PURPOSE: We tested the efficacy and side effect profiles of intravesical atropine compared to oxybutynin immediate release when used by individuals with multiple sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a study to determine the most effective dose of atropine. Eight participants used increasing doses of intravesical atropine during a 12-day period. Bladder diary data showed that the instillation of 6 mg atropine 4 times daily was most effective for increasing bladder capacity (voided/catheter volumes). We then did a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. Participants received 14 days of treatment with oral oxybutynin or with intravesical atropine, followed by 14 days of alternative treatment. Participants recorded a bladder diary and rated side effects and quality of life. The primary outcome variable was bladder capacity. RESULTS: A total of 57 participants with multiple sclerosis completed the study. Average change in bladder capacity was higher in the atropine arm. The mean +/- SD oxybutynin change was 55.5 +/- 67.2 ml, the mean atropine change was 79.6 +/- 89.6 ml and the mean difference between arms was 24.1 ml (95% CI -0.4, 49.7; p = 0.053). Changes in incontinence events and voiding frequency were not statistically different between the arms. Changes in total side effect and dry mouth scores were significantly better in the atropine treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical atropine was as effective as oxybutynin immediate release for increasing bladder capacity and it was probably better with less antimuscarinic side effects. We recommend that intravesical atropine should be made available to patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and voiding problems requiring intermittent catheterization as an alternative to oral therapy, which often has troublesome side effects.

Administration, Intravesical↗

PubMed2002

A randomized crossover trial of combination pharmacologic therapy in children with familial hyperlipidemia.

We sought to determine whether a low-dose combination of a bile acid-binding resin (colestipol) with an hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor (pravastatin) would result in improved acceptability, compliance, and effectiveness in lipid-lowering compared with conventional therapy with a higher dose of a bile acid-binding resin only, with fewer side effects. We performed a randomized, crossover open-label clinical trial with two 18-wk medication regimens separated by an 8-wk washout period in 36 children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or familial combined hyperlipidemia. The regimens included colestipol 10 g/d (10 pills) versus a combination of colestipol 5 g/d with pravastatin 10 mg/d (six pills). All patients were maintained on a fat-reduced diet. Acceptability was better with the combination regimen. Mean compliance was similar and suboptimal (approximately 60%) with all medication components. Mean relative LDL cholesterol lowering was significantly better with the combination regimen (-17 +/- 16% versus -10 +/- 13%; p = 0.045), although insufficient to achieve recommended target values in the majority of patients on either regimen. Both regimens were equally free of adverse effects, with no important effect on chemistry or hematologic values. Patient-reported adverse effects were more common with the conventional-dose colestipol-only regimen. Compliance with medication regimens using the bile acid-binding resins is suboptimal, although combination with a low dose of a statin may result in better lipid lowering.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Enhanced antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients whose platelets are least inhibited by aspirin: a randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether adding clopidogrel to aspirin in patients at high risk of future cardiovascular events would suppress laboratory measures of the antiplatelet effects of aspirin; and have greater platelet inhibitory effects in patients with the least inhibition of platelets by aspirin. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, comparing clopidogrel 75 mg day(-1) versus placebo, in 36 aspirin-treated patients with symptomatic objectively confirmed peripheral arterial disease. RESULTS: The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin did not suppress platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid, urinary 11 dehydro thromboxane B2 concentrations, or soluble markers of platelet activation markers (P-selectin, CD40-ligand) and inflammation (high sensitivity serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-6). Clopidogrel significantly inhibited platelet aggregation induced by ADP (reduction 26.2%; 95% CI: 21.3-31.1%, P < 0.0001) and collagen (reduction 6.2%; 95% CI: 3.2-9.3%, P = 0.0003). The greatest inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation by clopidogrel was seen in patients with the least inhibition of arachidonic acid induced aggregation by aspirin [lower tertile of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation: 2.8% (95% CI: -0.8 to 6.3%) reduction in mean collagen-induced aggregation by clopidogrel; middle tertile: 4.0% (95% CI: 0.4-7.6%); upper tertile 12.6% (95% CI: 4.5-20.8%); P-value for interaction 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest platelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel occurs in patients with the least inhibition of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation by aspirin. This raises the possibility that the clinical benefits of adding clopidogrel to aspirin may be greatest in patients whose platelets are least inhibited by aspirin. Confirmation in clinical outcome studies may allow these patients to be targeted with antiplatelet drugs that inhibit the ADP receptor, thereby overcoming the problem of laboratory aspirin resistance.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗

PubMed2003

A double-blind randomized crossover trial of two loop diuretics in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Torsemide has predictable absorption compared to furosemide. Thereby, torsemide results in more constant exposure to active drug. Our hypothesis was that this pharmacokinetic difference between these commonly used loop diuretics may translate into disparate antihypertensive responses in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, two-period, crossover trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of torsemide and furosemide, in 14 subjects with stage 2 or 3 CKD. We first performed an inpatient study, where after the subjects were brought into sodium balance on a 200 mEq per day diet, a single bioequivalent dose of oral loop diuretic was administered with an intervening washout period. Measurements of urinary electrolytes were made. Subjects then participated in an outpatient study, wherein they received daily therapy for 3 weeks with the loop diuretics in random order. Twenty four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed before and after each drug to assess the antihypertensive response. RESULTS: In the inpatient phase, furosemide increased urinary sodium excretion from average (+/-SD) 199 +/- 49 mEq/day to 357 +/- 96 mEq/day and torsemide increased urinary sodium excretion from 213 +/- 79 mEq/day to 398 +/- 142 mEq/day. These differences between the diuretics were not significant, confirming bioequivalence. In the outpatient phase, furosemide reduced 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure from 147 +/- 17/78 +/- 11 mm Hg to 138 +/- 21/74 +/- 12 mm Hg (P = 0.021) and torsemide reduced it from 143 +/- 18/75 +/- 10 mm Hg to 133 +/- 19/71 +/- 10 mm Hg (P = 0.007). Although each diuretic was effective in reducing ambulatory blood pressure, the differences between diuretics were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Bioequivalent doses of torsemide and furosemide given in a randomized, double-blind design fail to demonstrate superiority of torsemide with respect to natriuresis or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure control in subjects with stages 2 and 3 CKD.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Efficacy of a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine versus sumatriptan in acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine suppositories with sumatriptan suppositories in the treatment of 2 consecutive migraine attacks of moderate or severe intensity in a multicenter, randomized, crossover study. BACKGROUND: A fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine is the most commonly used drug for the acute treatment of migraine in Italy. No studies have been published comparing the efficacy of this combination with sumatriptan, the most widely prescribed of the triptans. METHODS: One hundred twelve patients with migraine with or without aura according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society were randomized to treat 2 migraine attacks with a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine and 2 migraine attacks with sumatriptan. Both drugs were rectally administered in a single dose for each attack. Patients were asked to take study medication as soon as possible at the onset of a headache. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients, 88 were compliant to the protocol. More attacks became pain-free at 2 hours postdose (primary end point) on the combination than on sumatriptan (49% versus 34%; P<.01), while there was no difference in the relief of headache at 2 hours postdose (71% versus 65%). The combination was statistically superior to sumatriptan in the time to a pain-free response (a higher percentage of attacks became pain-free from 0.5 hours postdose to 5 hours postdose), in alleviation of nausea, and in a sustained pain-free response (pain-free at 2 hours postdose with no use of rescue medication or relapses within 48 hours). Moreover, a significant consistent response was achieved for the combination compared with sumatriptan across (higher percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours postdose in the first, second, third, and fourth treated attack) and within patients (pain-free in 2 of 2 treated attacks in 35% of patients taking the combination and 20% of patients on sumatriptan). Both drugs were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study, analyzed according to the more recent guidelines for controlled trials in migraine, showed that a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine is significantly more effective than sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. It is notable that the combination is less expensive than sumatriptan per unit dose.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1996

Evaluation of heliox in children hospitalized with acute severe asthma. A randomized crossover trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether breathing a blend of 70% helium:30% oxygen (heliox) would improve pulmonary function, decrease clinical score, and improve the sensation of dyspnea in children hospitalized with acute severe asthma. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. SETTING: The inpatient pediatric service of a military, tertiary care, teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Children 5 to 18 years who required hospital admission for treatment of acute asthma. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 5 mg of nebulized albuterol every 1 to 4 h, with a dose given within 30 min of the start of the study, and IV administered methylprednisolone. Patients breathed heliox and a 30% oxygen-enriched air mixture for 15 min each in random order. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Clinical score, dyspnea score, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate, followed by FVC, FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and, mean midexpiratory flow rate (FEF25-75) were obtained at study entry, 15 min after breathing the first gas mixture (heliox or air per randomization), 15 min after breathing the second mixture, and again 15 min after stopping the second gas mixture (study end values). Eleven children were enrolled, and all completed the study. There were no significant differences between study entry and study end spirometric values. Using the paired t test, we found no significant differences between mean values (SD) of FEV1 and FVC obtained while breathing heliox vs air; FEV1-heliox, 53% (18%) of the predicted value; FEV1-air, 52% (16%) of the predicted value (p = 0.36); FVC-heliox, 69% (22%) of the predicted value; and FVC-air, 70% (21%) of the predicted value (p = 0.50). The differences in values for PEFSR and FEF25-75 while breathing heliox vs air were small but did reach statistical significance in favor of heliox: PEFR-heliox, 56% (20%) of the predicted value; PEFR-air, 50% (16%) of the predicted value (p = 0.04); FEF25-75-heliox, 32% (13%) of the predicted value; and FEF25-75-heliox, 29% (11%) of the predicted value (p = 0.006). Heliox had no effect on either clinical or dyspnea scores. CONCLUSION: The short-term inhalation of heliox did not benefit this group of children hospitalized with acute, severe asthma.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2026

Orange juice and hesperidin increase flavanone exposure without detectable short-term vascular benefits: a randomized crossover trial.

Orange juice is a major dietary source of hesperidin, a citrus flavanone with vascular protective effects in experimental models. However, whether nutritionally realistic intake levels induce measurable benefits in humans remains unclear. We investigated the effects of orange juice and hesperidin supplementation, at realistic dietary doses, on vascular function, flavanone bioavailability, and molecular responses. Thirty-seven centrally overweight men completed a randomized, double-blind, controlled, three-period crossover trial with three 6-week interventions separated by washout periods. Participants consumed daily 330 mL of 100% orange juice (OJ), an isoenergetic control beverage (CON), or a hesperidin-enriched control beverage (HESP, 210 mg day-1). Fasting vascular, metabolic and anthropometric parameters were assessed before and after each intervention, with flow-mediated dilation (FMD) as the primary endpoint. Postprandial FMD, circulating flavanone metabolites and oxylipin profiles were evaluated following a standardized high-fat meal challenge, and flavanone bioavailability was assessed by 24 h urinary excretion. Whole-blood transcriptomics were performed in a subset (n = 9). Plasma exposure to phase II hesperetin metabolites (AUC0-6 h) and 24 h urinary excretion were comparable after OJ and HESP, indicating effective hesperidin delivery and limited matrix effects on bioavailability. Neither intervention significantly affected fasting or postprandial FMD, vascular, metabolic or anthropometric parameters, or oxylipin profiles versus CON. Marked interindividual variability was observed in vascular responses and flavanone bioavailability, although treatment effects were unrelated to baseline endothelial function or flavanone exposure. Exploratory transcriptomic analyses suggested modulation of pathways involved in vascular biology following OJ and HESP. Under nutritionally realistic conditions, orange juice and hesperidin induced measurable biological engagement without detectable short-term vascular benefits, highlighting the complexity of linking flavanone exposure to functional vascular outcomes in humans.

Humans↗

PubMed1998

Growth hormone replacement does not improve psychological well-being in adult hypopituitarism: a randomized crossover trial.

In order to examine the effect of growth hormone (GH) on psychological parameters in adult hypopituitarism, 20 adults were studied, mean age 47 years (range 20-69) with hypopituitarism and confirmed GH deficiency (GH < 3 micrograms/l following clonidine 0.15 mg/m2). Subjects were randomly allocated to either GH-up to 0.25 U/kg per week in daily doses) or placebo for 3 months before crossover to the opposite treatment arm. Psychological parameters were assessed by self-reported questionnaires (Disease Specific Questionnaire (DSQ), the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), and the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS)) at baseline and monthly intervals to the end of the trial. Both SAS and SCL-90 total scores showed a significant decline with respect to time (p = .03 and .013 respectively), although this was not a function of active treatment. DSQ showed a trend to decline (p = .06), but no effect of active treatment. None of the subscale components of the SCL-90 showed any significant change on active treatment. Improvement in psychological parameters occurs as a function of enrolment to a clinical trial, rather than active GH replacement in adult hypopituitarism.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

A randomized crossover trial of Quick Medical Reference (QMR) as a teaching tool for medical interns.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of Quick Medical Reference (QMR) to usual educational tools improves an intern's performance in managing clinical cases that test diagnostic and investigative skills. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blinded crossover study. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Comprehensive medical interns who are proficient in the use of QMR. INTERVENTION: A total of 16 interns trained in the use of QMR were randomized to work up a total of six diagnostically challenging cases, three using medical textbooks plus access to QMR and three using textbooks and no access to QMR. MEASUREMENTS: The interns provided their solutions to the cases, which consisted of the differential diagnosis and investigations. They were scored by comparing their answers with the consensus answers provided by subspecialty consultants. For each intern, the difference in mean total scores with and without QMR was calculated. RESULTS: The mean difference in total scores was 7.2% benefit (p < 0.05, 95% CI = 0.05 to 14.4) using QMR. The beneficial difference was driven mainly by improvement in diagnostic scores, with the mean difference being 11.6% (p = 0.01, 95% CI = 2.4 to 20.8). Regression analysis showed that the more difficult the case, the greater the benefit of QMR. CONCLUSIONS: Quick Medical Reference may be a useful adjunct to interns in formulating diagnostic strategies for difficult clinical cases. However, since optimal conditions were chosen for QMR benefit in this study design, the small benefit in test scores must be weighed against the time required to teach QMR to interns.

Adult↗

PubMed1982

Comparison of oral propranolol and verapamil for combined systemic hypertension and angina pectoris. A placebo-controlled double-blind randomized crossover trial.

The relative efficacies of oral verapamil, a calcium-entry blocking drug, and propranolol, a beta-adrenergic blocking drug, were compared in 12 patients who had both stable angina pectoris and mild to moderate systemic hypertension, using a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover protocol. Compared with placebo, both propranolol and verapamil decreased the frequency of anginal attacks and the number of nitroglycerin tablets consumed, and increased exercise duration and total work; there were no significant differences in the antianginal effect of the two drugs. Both verapamil and propranolol reduced the supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured at rest; compared with propranolol, however, verapamil had greater effects on standing diastolic blood pressure (p less than 0.002). Resting heart rate was reduced from placebo baseline with large doses of both drugs; compared with verapamil, however, propranolol exerted greater effects on resting heart rate and rate-pressure product. Plasma renin activity was increased from placebo baseline with verapamil (p less than 0.05), but was reduced with propranolol (p less than 0.05); no significant change in plasma aldosterone was seen with either drug. Verapamil appears to be a safe and effective treatment alternative to propranolol for relieving anginal symptoms, improving exercise tolerance, and reducing elevated systemic blood pressure in patients with both angina pectoris and mild to moderate systemic hypertension.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1998

Effect of visual cues, vital signs, and protocols on triage: a prospective randomized crossover trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare triage designations derived from in-person and telephone interviews and systematically examine the effect of visual cues, vital signs, and complaint-based protocols on the triage process. METHODS: We conducted a 2-phase, prospective, observational study employing a randomized, crossover design in a university teaching hospital emergency department. In both phases, every eligible patient underwent sequential in-person and telephone triage interviews conducted by certified ED triage nurses. After taking a history, each nurse chose 1 of 5 hypothetical triage designations and, after being told the patient's vital signs, again selected a designation. Phase 1 designations were based solely on nurses' clinical expertise. In phase 2, both nurses used complaint-based protocols. RESULTS: Agreement between telephone and in-person designations was poor (percent agreement, 43.1% to 48.8%; kappa,.19 to.26; taub,.34 to.45 for the 4 primary comparisons). Knowledge of vital signs and use of protocols did not improve agreement or increase identification of patients requiring admission to hospital. CONCLUSION: These data establish that telephone and in-person triage are not equivalent and suggest that visual cues may play an important role in the triage process. It is unclear whether telephone triage is an adequate method of assigning patients to an appropriate level of care.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Food does not affect the pharmacokinetics of solifenacin, a new muscarinic receptor antagonist: results of a randomized crossover trial.

AIM: To determine the effect of food ingestion on the pharmacokinetic profile of solifenacin succinate (YM905; Vesicare, a new bladder selective muscarinic receptor antagonist for the treatment of overactive bladder, a chronic disease usually caused by involuntary detrusor muscle contractions during bladder filling. METHODS: A randomized, two-period, crossover study in two groups of 12 healthy men (aged 18-45 years, body weight 60-100 kg, body mass index < or =30). A single 10-mg dose of solifenacin was administered to the first group in the fasting state during period 1 and in the fed state during period 2, and to the second group in the fed state during period 1 and in the fasting state during period 2 (10 mg is two times the suggested starting dose). There was a 14-day washout between treatment periods. Parameters obtained included C(max), AUC(last), and AUC(0-inf), as well as t(1/2), t(max), and t(lag). RESULTS: One subject withdrew during the first period for personal reasons. No statistically or clinically significant pharmacokinetic differences occurred between subjects in the fed and fasting states. All geometric mean ratios were close to 1 (C(max), 1.033; AUC(last), 1.068; AUC(0-inf), 1.040). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fell in the predefined no-food-effect boundaries of 0.8-1.25 (C(max), 0.953-1.120; AUC(last), 0.990-1.153; AUC(0-inf), 0.976-1.109). The mean difference in t(1/2) was -3.8 h (90% CI 7.6-0.0). There were no significant differences between the fed and fasting states with regard to t(max) and t(lag) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of oral solifenacin was not affected by food ingestion, suggesting that this drug may be administered with or without food. The results observed in this investigation are consistent with those of previous studies of solifenacin.

Adolescent↗