SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “throwing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Gender Differences in Intercepting a Moving Target by Using a Throw or Button Press.

Humans are a throwing species just as much as a talking species (Calvin, 1982), but preadaptations for throwing remain largely unexplored. The ability of undergraduate students (N = 165) to intercept a stimulus with a thrown object was determined for 10 stimulus speeds, ranging from 2 to 5 m/s. The inclusion of a condition in which the moving stimulus was intercepted via button press allowed the role of the perceptual aspect of velocity estimation to be evaluated separately from the act of throwing. Gender differences were observed in both the button and the throwing intercept tasks: The men had smaller timing errors and higher accuracy than the women. Contrary to expectations, the male and female patterns of intercept errors as a function of stimulus speed were more similar in the throwing task than in the button intercept task.

gender differences↗

PubMed2001

The biomechanics of an overarm throwing task: a simulation model examination of optimal timing of muscle activations.

A series of overarm throws, constrained to the parasagittal plane, were simulated using a muscle model actuated two-segment model representing the forearm and hand plus projectile. The parameters defining the modeled muscles and the anthropometry of the two-segment models were specific to the two young male subjects. All simulations commenced from a position of full elbow flexion and full wrist extension. The study was designed to elucidate the optimal inter-muscular coordination strategies for throwing projectiles to achieve maximum range, as well as maximum projectile kinetic energy for a variety of projectile masses. A proximal to distal (PD) sequence of muscle activations was seen in many of the simulated throws but not all. Under certain conditions moment reversal produced a longer throw and greater projectile energy, and deactivation of the muscles resulted in increased projectile energy. Therefore, simple timing of muscle activation does not fully describe the patterns of muscle recruitment which can produce optimal throws. The models of the two subjects required different timings of muscle activations, and for some of the tasks used different coordination patterns. Optimal strategies were found to vary with the mass of the projectile, the anthropometry and the muscle characteristics of the subjects modeled. The tasks examined were relatively simple, but basic rules for coordinating these tasks were not evident.

Anthropometry↗

PubMed2005

Learning a throwing task is associated with differential changes in the use of motor abundance.

This study sought to characterize changes in the synergy of joint motions related to learning a Frisbee throwing task and, in particular, how the use of abundant solutions to joint coordination changed during the course of learning for successful performance. The latter information was helpful in determining the relative importance of different performance-related variables (PVs) to performance improvement. Following a pre-test, the main experiment consisted of six subjects practicing a Frisbee throw to a laterally-placed target for five days, 150 throws per day, followed by a post-test. A subgroup of three subjects continued to practice for an extended period of extensive practice amounting to 1800-2700 additional throws each, followed by a second post-test. Motor abundance was addressed through the uncontrolled manifold approach (UCM), which was used to partition the variance of joint configurations into two components with respect to relevant PVs, one component leading to a consistent value of the PV across repetitions, and a reflection of motor abundance, and a second component resulting in unstable values of the relevant PV. The method was used to test hypotheses about the relative importance of controlling the PVs that have an impact on successful task performance: movement extent, movement direction, hand path velocity, and the hand's orientation to the target. In addition, the amount of self-motion, or apparently extraneous joint motion having no effect on the hand's motion, compared to joint motion that does affect the hand's motion, was determined. After a week of practice, all subjects showed improvement in terms of targeting accuracy. Hand movement variability also decreased with practice and this was associated with a decrease in overall joint configuration variance. This trend continued to a greater extent in the three subjects who participated in extended practice. Although the component of joint configuration variance that was consistent with a stable value of all PVs was typically substantially higher than variance leading to unstable values of those PVs, both components decreased with practice. However, the decrease in joint configuration variance reflecting motor abundance was less than the other variance component only in relation to control of movement direction and the hand's orientation to the target. These results indicate that improvement of throwing performance in this experiment was more related to improved stabilization of movement direction and to the hand's orientation to the target than to movement extent and hand velocity. Nonetheless, the relative values of the two joint variance components were such that the instantaneous value of both hand path velocity and movement extent were stabilized throughout the experiment and showed a consistent compensatory relationship at the time of Frisbee release, despite not changing with practice. Finally, the amount of self-motion increased significantly with practice, possibly reflecting better compensation for perturbations due to the limb's dynamics. The results are consistent with other studies, suggesting the need to reevaluate Bernstein's hypothesis of freeing and freezing DOFs with learning.

Arm↗

PubMed2005

Learning to throw on a rotating carousel: recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics.

Skilled actions exhibit adjustment in calibration to bring about their goals. The sought-after calibrations change as a function of the environmental situation that stages the actions. In these experiments participants sat on one side of a rotating carousel and threw beanbags underhanded at a target fixed on the opposite side. Logically, aimed throwing in this situation involves adjustment to fit changes in limb dynamics (originating from Coriolis forces) and changes in perceived projectile kinematics (originating from the tangential velocity of thrower and target). We studied whether such adjustment involved one or multiple components of recalibration. An initial experiment showed that exposure to rotation while throwing beanbags produced a robust recalibration in the direction of underhanded throws as manifest in throwing at stationary targets from a stationary position. Following some initial decay this recalibration persisted and approached an asymptote. Subsequent experiments suggested two independent components of recalibration. One is based on limb dynamics and accounts for the initial decay. The other is based on the perceived projectile kinematics and accounts for the stable change in throwing direction. These results raised the question of how multiple components of recalibration of an action are related. We propose that movement components are independent and calibrated separately at different levels in the organization of an action.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Causes of left-right ball inaccuracy in overarm throws made by cerebellar patients.

Cerebellar patients throw inaccurately in the left-right direction but the cause of this multijoint ataxia is unclear. We tested whether it was due, as originally proposed, to variable left-right directions of the hand path, or, alternatively, to variable timing of ball release occurring on a right to left curved hand path. We also examined the cause of the variability in hand path direction per se. Six right-handed cerebellar patients and six control subjects were instructed to throw tennis balls at a slow, medium and fast speed from a seated position while angular positions in 3D of five arm segments were recorded at 1000 Hz with the search-coil technique. Compared to controls, cerebellar patients threw slower and less accurately, had more variable timing of ball release occurring on a right to left curved hand path and had more variable left-right directions of hand paths at a fixed point in front of the sternum. In all cerebellar patients, ball left-right inaccuracy was related both to timing of ball release and to hand path direction at the fixed point. The cause of the increased variability in hand path direction varied between patients and could not be explained by disorder in a single joint rotation. No evidence was found that it resulted from variable stabilization at the shoulder during elbow extension. Instead, the more variable left-right direction of the hand path was related to the initial pattern of joint rotations occurring early in the throw before the onset of elbow extension, and to the amplitudes of radioulnar pronation and wrist abduction occurring late in the throw. The results emphasize that in the presence of a cerebellar lesion, ball left-right inaccuracy in overarm throws cannot be explained by a single disorder. Rather ball inaccuracy was likely due to disorders in central commands to proximal joint rotations that produced the hand path and in central commands to distal joints that controlled the timing of finger opening.

Arm↗

PubMed2003

Effect of body size and gender in overarm throwing performance.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between maximum isometric strength, anthropometry and maximum velocity in overarm throwing for male and female experienced handball players. Twenty male and 20 female handball players were tested. The mean ball velocity was 23.2 m s(-1) and 19.1 m s(-1) for male and female handball players, respectively. For males and females, similar correlations were found between maximal isometric strength and throwing velocity (men, r=0.43, P=0.056; women, r=0.49, P=0.027). Univariate analysis of variance between isometric strength and throwing velocity for men and women showed no significant effect of gender (F(2,36)=0.116, P=0.89). Body size had a strong positive effect on the throwing performance and isometric strength. Throwing velocity appeared to be affected by gender when size was expressed by mass or height (P<0.001). However, this dependence was completely explained by size differences when expressed as fat-free body mass (FFM). For strength, no gender effect was found at all, i.e. all gender differences were explained by size differences, irrespective on how this was expressed. The finding that strength and velocity show a gender independent relationship strengthens the notion that gender difference is based on difference in muscle bulk. We conclude that FFM, as an approximation for skeletal muscle mass, is the best measure to express body size when related to physical performance.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Rapid and accurate estimation of release conditions in the javelin throw.

We have developed a system to measure initial conditions in the javelin throw rapidly enough to be used by the thrower for feedback in performance improvement. The system consists of three subsystems whose main tasks are: (A) acquisition of automatically digitized high speed (200 Hz) video x, y position data for the first 0.1-0.2 s of the javelin flight after release (B) estimation of five javelin release conditions from the x, y position data and (C) graphical presentation to the thrower of these release conditions and a simulation of the subsequent flight together with optimal conditions and flight for the sam release velocity. The estimation scheme relies on a simulation model and is at least an order of magnitude more accurate than previously reported measurements of javelin release conditions. The system provides, for the first time ever in any throwing event, the ability to critique nearly instantly in a precise, quantitative manner the crucial factors in the throw which determine the range. This should be expected to much greater control and consistency of throwing variables by athletes who use system and could even lead to an evolution of new throwing techniques.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Scaphoid and lunate motion during a wrist dart throw motion.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to measure the in vitro scaphoid and lunate motion during 9 different variations of a wrist dart throw motion. Another goal was to determine the specific dart throw motion that minimized scaphoid and lunate motion. METHODS: Scaphoid and lunate motion were recorded in 7 cadaver forearms during various combinations of wrist dart throw motions caused by a wrist joint motion simulator. RESULTS: During wrist flexion and extension the scaphoid and lunate motions follow the wrist motion. During wrist radial and ulnar deviation the scaphoid and lunate correspondingly flex and extend. During intermediate motions the scaphoid and lunate move as little as 26% of the total third metacarpal motion and do not necessarily follow a planar motion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that there may be a dart throw motion during which there may be minimal scaphoid and lunate motion. If a subject's wrist motion could be clinically restricted to this dart throw motion, early hand mobility might be possible after surgery on the scaphoid and lunate.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Visual perception of action categories and the "bowl-throw" decision in cricket.

Cricket umpires, cricket bowlers, and physical education students (who were knowledgeable about the rules of cricket), were shown 72 videotaped point-light displays of cricket deliveries with varying extents of elbow flexion such that they ranged from highly "bowl-like" to highly "throw-like". The observers made a bowl-throw decision about each display, and the umpires and bowlers reported their confidence on a 5-point scale. The percentage of displays reported as a "bowl" was 59, 40, and 44 for the umpires, bowlers, and students respectively. Umpires made significantly more bowl decisions than both the bowlers and students, but there was no difference between the latter groups. Umpires were significantly more confident than the bowlers in both their bowl and throw decisions. Thus, in an experimental setting, with no apparent costs or benefits associated with their decision-making, umpires "called" a bowler significantly less frequently for throwing than other knowledgeable observers. The procedures devised for this experiment demonstrate that psychophysical methods can be applied to the problem of discrete action-category nominations in sport (e.g., bowl or throw, walk or run).

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2005

Differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity among elite and amateur male handball players.

This study compared physical characteristics (body height, body mass [BM], body fat [BF], and free fatty mass [FFM]), one repetition maximum bench-press (1RM (BP)), jumping explosive strength (VJ), handball throwing velocity, power-load relationship of the leg and arm extensor muscles, 5- and 15-m sprint running time, and running endurance in two handball male teams: elite team, one of the world's leading teams (EM, n = 15) and amateur team, playing in the Spanish National Second Division (AM, n = 15). EM had similar values in body height, BF, VJ, 5- and 15-m sprint running time and running endurance than AM. However, the EM group gave higher values in BM (95.2 +/- 13 kg vs. 82.4 +/- 10 kg, p < 0.05), FFM (81.7 +/- 9 kg vs. 72.4 +/- 7 kg, p < 0.05), 1RM (BP) (107 +/- 12 kg vs. 83 +/- 10 kg, p < 0.001), muscle power during bench-press (18 - 21 %, p < 0.05) and half squat (13 - 17 %), and throwing velocities at standing (23.8 +/- 1.9 m . s (-1) vs. 21.8 +/- 1.6 m . s (-1), p < 0.05) and 3-step running (25.3 +/- 2.2 m . s (-1) vs. 22.9 +/- 1.4 m . s (-1), p < 0.05) actions than the AM group. Significant correlations (r = 0.67 - 0.71, p < 0.05 - 0.01) were observed in EM and AM between individual values of velocity at 30 % of 1RM (BP) and individual values of ball velocity during a standing throw. Significant correlations were observed in EM, but not in AM, between the individual values of velocity during 3-step running throw and the individual values of velocity at 30 % of 1RM (BP) (r = 0.72, p < 0.05), as well as the individual values of power at 100 % of body mass during half-squat actions (r = 0.62, p < 0.05). The present results suggest that more muscular and powerful players are at an advantage in handball. The differences observed in free fatty mass could partly explain the differences observed between groups in absolute maximal strength and muscle power. In EM, higher efficiency in handball throwing velocity may be associated with both upper and lower extremity power output capabilities, whereas in AM this relationship may be different. Endurance capacity does not seem to represent a limitation for elite performance in handball.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Prediction of distance in hammer throwing.

The aim of this study was to determine how much the predicted distance of a hammer throw is affected by (1) ignoring air resistance and (2) assuming that the centre of mass of the hammer coincides with the centre of the ball. Three-dimensional data from actual throws (men: 72.82 +/- 7.43 m; women: 67.78 +/- 4.02 m) were used to calculate the kinematic conditions of the hammer at release. A mathematical model of the hammer was then used to simulate the three-dimensional airborne motion of the hammer and to predict the distance of the throw. The distance predicted for vacuum conditions and using the ball centre to represent the hammer centre of mass was 4.30 +/- 2.64 m longer than the official distance of the throw for the men and 8.82 +/- 3.20 m longer for the women. Predictions using the true centre of mass of the hammer reduced the discrepancy to 2.39 +/- 2.58 m for the men and 5.28 +/- 2.88 m for the women. Predictions using air resistance and the true centre of mass of the hammer further reduced the discrepancy to -0.46 +/- 2.63 m for the men and 1.16 +/- 2.31 m for the women. Approximately half the loss of distance produced by air resistance was due to forces made on the ball and the remainder to forces made on the cable and handle. Equations were derived for calculation of the effects of air resistance and of the assumption that the centre of mass of the hammer coincides with the centre of the ball, on the distance of the throw.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1996

The task difficulty of free throw shooting for males and females.

The study demonstrated how the binomial trials model could be used to enhance performance evaluation of a psychomotor task. The study was designed to accomplish three purposes: (a) calibrate the task difficulty of shooting free throws; (b) determine if free-throw shooting is a more difficult task for females than males; and (c) demonstrate how grading scales could be developed when a difference in task difficulty exists. Adults (202 males and 196 females) ranging in age from 18 to 55 years shot 17 consecutive free throws. The performance scores were analyzed using the binomial trials model. The model fit the data for the total group and the females. Because no males scored 0 or more than 13, the model did not fit the data at the extremes of the score continuum. The task difficulty for females was 0.793 (SE = 0.084) and 0.068 (SE = 0.081) for males, which indicated differential item functioning, Chi 1(2) = 38.73, p < .0001. Shooting free throws with a men's regulation basketball was a more difficult task for females than males, which indicates the task does not measure the same latent trait ability for both groups. On average the males' probability of making a free throw was .146 units higher than for the females. Ability estimates were mapped to observed scores for males and females separately and used to illustrate how fair grading scales could be developed.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Relative contributions to the net joint moment for a planar multijoint throwing skill: early and late in practice.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine, for a planar, multijoint throwing skill, if the relative contributions of the components of the net joint moment (NJM) at the elbow and shoulder change after practice. Each participant (N = 7) performed 200 throwing trials equally distributed across 5 consecutive days. Each participant threw a 0.15-kg ball as far as possible using the nondominant arm while the motion of the throwing arm was restrained to a horizontal plans. From video data and body segment inertial estimations, NJMs and NJM components (i.e., generalized muscle moments and motion-dependent moments) were calculated for selected early and late practice trials. Performance (throwing distance) showed an expected improvement from early to late practice. The dynamics analysis indicated that participants increased average NJMs and NJM components at both joints. However, the relative contribution of NJM components, expressed as ratios of those components to the NJM at each joint, did not change after extended practice. Restraining the throwing arm to a horizontal plane may partly explain why no changes were found in the relative contributions of NJM components. The lack of change in moment ratios support a motor strategy of scaling joint moments for faster movements.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Shoulder and elbow kinematics in throwing of young baseball players.

In this study we compared the kinematic features of the throwing motion between young baseball players of different age groups. Forty-four Japanese baseball players aged 6.1 to 12.3 years who regularly played baseball, including pitchers and position players, had their throwing actions analyzed three-dimensionally using high speed videography. Of this sample, 26 players aged above 9 years of age were categorized as the senior group, while the remaining 18 were categorized as the junior group. Senior group throwers had greater height and body mass, and produced a greater ball speed than junior group throwers. The throwing arm movement of senior group throwers was similar to that of adult skilled players. However, in the junior group throwers, the shoulder horizontal adduction angle was larger during the arm acceleration phase, and the maximum angular velocities of elbow extension and shoulder internal rotation occurred later than in senior group throwers. These results indicate that players aged above 9 years can acquire a mature throwing arm movement, while players younger than that will use an immature motion. A possible reason why these differences were shown is that the official baseball is relatively heavy for junior group throwers; they would be better advised to use a lighter ball in throwing practice.

Baseball↗

PubMed2006

Old habits tie hard: an in vitro comparison of first-throw tension holding in Polyglycolic acid (Dexon S) and Polyglactin 910 (Coated Vicryl).

PURPOSE: To compare the first-throw tension holding property of two braided absorbable sutures commonly used in oculoplastic surgery. METHODS: The study was an in vitro experimental model. 6/0 Polyglycolic acid (Dexon S) and 6/0 Polyglactin 910 (Coated Vicryl) were compared using an experimental model to determine first-throw knot security. A polypropylene suture (Surgipro 2) was included as a benchmark to judge the apparatus by, ensuring that our experiment could be designed independently of the test suture materials. Increasing metric loads were applied to the first double throw of a surgical knot. Each suture was tested to the point of knot slipping and the critical tension recorded. All the sutures were kept wet during use. Three variations of the experiment were undertaken: experiment 1 -- two metal loops brought together by the test suture; experiment 2 -- two strips of tissue brought together by the test suture; and experiment 3 -- a knot tied over a metal bar coated in tissue. The tissue used was processed cross-linked porcine dermal collagen (Permacol). Each experiment was repeated three times for each suture type and the mean value taken. RESULTS: Experiment 1: Dexon S 12.2 g (11, 12, 13.5), Coated Vicryl 2.5 g (2.5, 2.5, 2.5) and Surgipro 2 2.3 g (2, 2, 3); experiment 2: Dexon S 33.33 g (30, 35, 35), Coated Vicryl 25 g (25, 25, 25) and Surgipro 2 5 g (5, 5, 5); experiment 3: Dexon S 100 g (100, 100, 100), Coated Vicryl 56.667 g (60, 55, 55) and Surgipro 2 5 g (5, 5, 5). CONCLUSIONS: Dexon S-braided absorbable suture has significantly better first-throw knot security when compared with Coated Vicryl. This is an important property when suturing tissues under tension as it minimizes slippage before the locking throw is tied.

Coated Materials, Biocompatible↗

PubMed2003

Counteractive relationship between the interaction torque and muscle torque at the wrist is predestined in ball-throwing.

Many investigators have demonstrated that in swing motions such as ball-throwing, the motion of the proximal joint (shoulder) produced assistive interaction torque for the distal joint (elbow). In line with these studies, the shoulder and elbow motions would be expected to produce the assistive interaction torque for the wrist joint as well. However, we recently showed that the interaction torque at the wrist was always counteractive to the wrist muscle torque during ball-throwing. The purpose of this study is to clarify, by means of computer simulation, whether the counteractive relationship at the wrist during ball-throwing is caused by the neural contribution or the musculoskeletal mechanical properties of the human arm. First, we simulated the throwing motions of the normal forearm-hand model by systematically changing the proximal-to-distal delay of muscle activities and could line up two candidates for the determinant of the counteractive relationship: the rest angle (neutral angle) of the wrist and the length and mass of the hand. Second, we simulated the throwing motions of the virtual forearm-hand models, showing that only nonrealistic elongation of these two parameters produced the assistive relationship between the interaction torque and muscle torque. These results suggested that the mechanical properties of the human wrist are the main determinant of the counteractive relationship, which is advantageous for keeping the state of the wrist joint stable in multi-joint upper-limb movements and would lead to avoidance of excessive wrist extension or flexion and simplification of extrinsic finger control.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Utilization and compensation of interaction torques during ball-throwing movements.

The manner in which the CNS deals with interaction torques at each joint in ball throwing was investigated by instructing subjects to throw a ball at three different speeds, using two (elbow and wrist) or three joints (shoulder, elbow, and wrist). The results indicated that the role of the muscle torque at the most proximal joint was to accelerate the most proximal joint and to produce the effect of interjoint interaction on the distal joints. In the three-joint throwing, shoulder muscle torque produced the assistive interaction torque for the elbow, which was effectively utilized to generate large elbow angular velocity when throwing fast. However, at the wrist, the muscle torque always counteracted the interaction torque. By this kinetic mechanism, the wrist angular velocity at the ball-release time was kept relatively constant irrespective of ball speed, which would lead to an accurate ball release. Thus it was concluded that humans can adjust the speed and accuracy of ball-throwing by utilizing interaction torque or compensating for it.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the overhead throwing athlete.

The overhead throwing motion is an extremely skillful and intricate movement that is very stressful on the shoulder joint complex. The overhead throwing athlete places extraordinary demands on this complex. Excessively high stresses are applied to the shoulder joint because of the tremendous forces generated by the thrower. The thrower's shoulder must be lax enough to allow excessive external rotation, but stable enough to prevent symptomatic humeral head subluxations, thus requiring a delicate balance between mobility and functional stability. We refer to this as the "thrower's paradox." This balance is frequently compromised, which leads to injury. Numerous types of injuries may occur to the surrounding tissues during overhead throwing. Frequently, injuries can be successfully treated with a well-structured and carefully implemented nonoperative rehabilitation program. The key to successful nonoperative treatment is a thorough clinical examination and accurate diagnosis. Athletes often exhibit numerous adaptive changes that develop from the repetitive microtraumatic stresses observed during overhead throwing. Treatment should focus on the restoration of these adaptations during the rehabilitation program. In this article, the typical musculoskeletal profile of the overhead thrower and various rehabilitation programs for specific injuries are discussed. Rehabilitation follows a structured, multiphase approach with emphasis on controlling inflammation, restoring muscle balance, improving soft tissue flexibility, enhancing proprioception and neuromuscular control, and efficiently returning the athlete to competitive throwing.

Athletic Injuries↗