[Review of 10-year therapy and its results in perforated gastric and duodenal ulcer in the Serajevo surgical clinic].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Both the incidence of and mortality from bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers are growing. We assessed the association between smoking, ingestion of alcohol (including the type of alcoholic beverage), and risk of a complicated peptic ulcer in a population-based study of 26,518 Danish subjects followed up for an average of 13.4 years. There were 214 cases of incident bleeding and 107 cases with perforated ulcers. We estimated the relative risks (RRs) of incident bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers with the Poisson regression analysis. Smoking more than 15 cigarettes a day compared with never smoking increased the risk of a perforated ulcer more than threefold (RR = 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-7.1). Ingestion of more than 42 drinks a week increased the risk of a bleeding ulcer fourfold (RR = 4.4; 95% CI = 2.3-8.3) compared with ingestion of less than one drink a week. Comparison of the same group, showed that subjects who ingested more than 21 drinks a week, but no wine, were at a higher risk of a bleeding ulcer (RR = 8.8; 95% CI = 2.2-35) than drinkers of the same amount of alcohol, but with more than 25% of their intake as wine (RR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.0-6.0).
BACKGROUND: For treatment of giant perforated peptic ulcers, we hypothesized that partitioning of the gastric body instead of the antrum would prevent hypergastrinemia and minimize ulcerogenic risk. By maintaining part of the acid-secreting gastric body in continuity with the excluded distal stomach, gastrin-secreting cells in the antrum would still be inhibited by gastric acid secretion from the gastric body. METHODS: We studied (1) gastric body partition with gastrojejunostomy in 8 critically ill patients with giant perforated peptic ulcers and (2) the influence of gastric partition on serum gastrin in 18 dogs with gastric antral partition + gastrojejunostomy, or gastric body partition + gastrojejunostomy, or gastrotomy. RESULTS: No patient developed major postoperative complications. Serum gastrin levels were normal in 6 patients but showed an abnormal increase in 2 patients 1 month after gastric body partition. Serum gastrin levels had returned to the normal range at postoperative follow-up after 2 years. In the animal study, serum gastrin levels and the number of G-cells in the excluded antrum and acid-secreting parietal cells in the gastric body were increased when evaluated on day 60 postoperatively or after antral partition, compared with preoperative data in the same group. These changes did not occur in the group undergoing partition of the gastric body and the group undergoing gastrostomy. Postoperative serum gastrin levels, and the number of G-cells and parietal cells also was significantly greater in the antral partition group than in the other 2 groups. No ulcer was found in any dog in the gastric body partition and gastrostomy groups, but ulcers occurred in 4 dogs in the antral partition group, all of whom died of ulcer perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric body partition + gastrojejunostomy is a simple, dependable procedure for patients with perforated giant peptic ulcers. This procedure does not require extreme expertise and can be performed in a very short time, even by a trainee general surgeon in emergency.
A cohort pattern has been demonstrated for ulcer mortality and perforation, pointing to a role of early life factors, while only a period-related decrease has been observed in elective ulcer surgery, which reflects uncomplicated ulcer. The aim of this article was to study whether the susceptibility to peptic ulcer disease is determined early in life, as reflected in a cohort pattern consistent for all ulcer manifestations. The subjects were all patients treated surgically for peptic ulcer (perforations 1962-1990; bleedings 1971-1990; elective surgery 1971-1990) and all deaths from peptic ulcer (perforations and other ulcer deaths 1951-1989) in Iceland. Age-specific incidence and mortality were analyzed graphically by year of birth (cohort) and by year of event (period). The effects of cohort and period on incidence and mortality were analyzed by Poisson regression. Ulcer perforation and bleeding, operative incidence, and mortality, showed a rise and subsequent fall in successive generations, with the highest risks observed in the subjects born after the turn of the 20(th) century. This was confirmed by statistical analyses showing highly significant cohort effects (P <.001) and no period effects. A cohort pattern was similarly found for elective ulcer surgery (P <.001), as well as a period-related decrease across age groups (P <.001). Ulcer complications, ulcer deaths, and uncomplicated ulcer were particularly common in specific generations carrying a high risk of peptic ulcer throughout their lives. These were the generations with the highest prevalence of H. pylori antibodies, the subjects born after the turn of the century at a time of maximum crowding and poor hygiene in Iceland due to the industrial revolution.
BACKGROUND: Our understanding of the cause and treatment of peptic ulcer disease has changed dramatically over the last couple of decades. It was quite common some years ago to treat chronic ulcers surgically. These days, the operative treatment is restricted to the small proportion of ulcer patients who have complications such as perforation. The author reports seven cases of perforated duodenal ulcers seen in a surgical clinic between 1995 and 2001. Recommendations on the criteria for selecting the appropriate surgical intervention for patients with perforated duodenal ulcer are given. OBJECTIVE: To decide on the appropriate surgical interventions for patients with perforated duodenal ulcer. DESIGN: These are case series of 7 patients who presented with perforated duodenal ulcers without a history of peptic ulcer disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients presented with perforated duodenal ulcer 72 hours after perforation in a specialist surgical clinic in Kampala were analyzed. Appropriate management based on these patients is suggested. RESULTS: These patients were initially treated in upcountry clinics for acute gastritis from either alcohol consumption or suspected food poisoning. There was no duodenal ulcer history. As a result, they came to specialist surgical clinic more than 72 hours after perforation. Diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer was made and they were operated using the appropriate surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of hangovers and acute gastritis from alcoholic consumption or suspected food poisoning should be treated with suspicion because the symptoms and signs may mimic perforated peptic ulcer in "silent" chronic ulcers. The final decision on the appropriate surgical intervention for patients with perforated duodenal ulcer stratifies them into two groups: The previously fit patients who have relatively mild physiological compromise imposed on previously healthy organ system by the perforation can withstand the operative stress of definitive procedure. The Second category includes patients who are critically ill, who poorly tolerate any operation and hence poor surgical risks. These require urgent, adequate resuscitation and simple suture with omental patch.
STUDY AIM: The aim of this retrospective survey was to evaluate the results of laparoscopic treatment in perforated peptic ulcer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 1998, 84 patients were operated on for perforated ulcer. Sixty nine patients, operated on with videolaparoscopy, were included in this study: 53 men and 12 women with a mean age of 45 +/- 16 years (19-85). Nine had a history of peptic ulcer disease and 12 received anti-inflammatory drugs. Perforation occurred in the duodenum (60 patients) and in the stomach (five patients). Laparoscopic treatment included peritoneal lavage and either a simple duodenal closure (51 patients), a closure with a highly selective vagotomy (one patient), an epiplooplasty (eight patients), or an excision-closure for the gastric ulcers (five patients). Drainage was associated in 38 patients (58%). RESULTS: A conversion into laparotomy was necessary in six patients. Among the 59 patients treated with laparoscopy, 56 were only managed laparoscopically, three had exploration and peritoneal lavage through laparoscopy, and underwent suture of the perforation through minilaparotomy. Mean operative time was 105 +/- 40 minutes (30-240). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.2 +/- 4 days. Reoperation was performed in three patients for leakage (n = 2) and gall bladder perforation (n = 1). Complications were medically treated in three patients. There was no in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic management in perforated peptic ulcer is successful in 90% of the patients. Results are good. There was no postoperative death in this series.
BACKGROUND: A series of 100 consecutive patients with perforated peptic ulcer were prospectively evaluated in a multicenter study. The feasibility of the laparoscopic repair was evaluated. METHODS: All patients had peritonitis, 20% were in septic shock, and 57% had delayed perforation. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in eight patients. The morbidity rate was 9% and mortality rate 5%. RESULTS: The mean delay of postoperative gastric aspiration (mean 3.4 days) and resumed food intake (mean 4.4 days) as well as the mean postoperative hospital stay (mean 9.3 days) were comparable to conventional surgery, but postoperative comfort was subjectively increased by laparoscopy and noticed by all laparoscopic surgeons participating in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer proves to be technically feasable and carries an acceptable morbidity and mortality rate, compared with conventional surgery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Massive accumulation of intraperitoneal air may result in an entity known as tension pneumoperitoneum. The patient usually complains only of abdominal fullness, and the abdomen becomes ballooned, barrel-shaped, and tympanic in all quadrants. Upward displacement of the diaphragm may cause respiratory embarrassment. There may also be diminished venous return due to compression of the inferior vena cava. Abdominal paracentesis may be necessary to improve respiratory exchange before laparotomy. In one patient with a perforated peptic ulcer and tension pneumoperitoneum, an enormous increase in intra-abdominal pressure apparently led to acute aortic occlusion. This particular complication of tension pneumoperitoneum has not previously been reported, to our knowledge. The clinical findings of aortic occlusion were reproduced in a canine model by insufflation of air into the abdomen. An intra-abdominal pressure of 100 mm Hg resulted in loss of the femoral pulse wave measured by an indwelling arterial catheter.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Despite being controversial in the past, many reports on the safe use of laparoscopic surgery in emergency settings have been published. The aim of this study was to investigate the diffusion of laparoscopic surgery in three common surgical emergency operations, namely, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and simple repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), in a stable population. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the central database of the Hospital Authority (HA) in Hong Kong. Data for patients managed in 14 HA hospitals from 1998 to 2002 were studied. The operation record and discharge record of each patient were also investigated to verify the data. RESULTS: A total of 12,708 patients underwent appendectomy, 2631 patients underwent cholecystectomy, and 2260 patients had simple repair of PPU performed. During the study period, 37.2% of appendectomies, 46.5% of cholecystectomies, and 23.1% of simple repairs of PPU were performed laparoscopically. More than a two-fold increase in the proportion of laparoscopic surgery was observed in each of these three operations. By the end of 2002, the percentage of laparoscopic surgery had increased to 53.5% for appendectomies, 61.3% for cholecystectomies, and 32.9% for simple repairs of PPU. Significantly lower hospital mortality rates and shorter postoperative hospital stay were consistenty observed in patients with laparoscopic surgery of the three emergencies. A wide variation in the use of laparoscopic surgery, ranging from 3.7% to 73.1%, was observed among the 14 HA hospitals. However, there was no correlation in the use of laparoscopic surgery with the volume of operation performed in each hospital (p = 0.933). CONCLUSION: A high diffusion rate on the use of laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergency was observed in Hong Kong. However, there was also a wide variation in the diffusion rate among the 14 HA hospitals. Efforts to reduce hospital variation for the better dissemination of safe laparoscopic technique may be warranted.
A case of Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome masquerading as a perforated peptic ulcer is presented. The pathophysiology, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, and management of this syndrome are discussed.
The improvement in surgical decision-making for patients with abdominal pain but an uncertain diagnosis using DL has now been shown to decrease both negative and nontherapeutic laparotomy rates. Once the diagnosis is established, DL can be taken a step further in many cases, as therapeutic intervention via laparoscopy is possible for a number of these conditions without resorting to a laparotomy. Conditions amenable to therapeutic laparoscopy include appendicitis, perforated peptic ulcer, diverticulitis, small bowel obstruction, acute cholecystitis, diaphragmatic rupture, and splenic or hepatic injuries, to name but a few. However, a number of unanswered questions remain such as: Who should perform emergency laparoscopic procedures? What should the selection criteria be? What are the cost implications? and Is patient outcome actually better with laparoscopy? Only randomized controlled trials can answer these questions. Until such data are available, it is important that common sense prevail. Laparoscopy should be incorporated into the general surgeon's armamentarium for the management of patients with abdominal pain as just another tool to be used selectively when indicated. It is also important that new technologies be carefully evaluated in an unbiased manner under strict protocol so that objective data can be obtained which can be used to devise guidelines for safe and effective use of new devices.
The case history is described of an infant, with a thoracic foregut duplication cyst containing a perforated peptic ulcer, who presented with haemoptysis and respiratory distress. This presentation is discussed within the context of thoracic foregut duplications.
PURPOSE: The infrequency of right-sided colonic diverticulitis prompted this presentation of our experiences, with emphasis on the diagnostic aspects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Charts and documentation regarding 20 patients who underwent surgery for diverticulitis of the caecum and/or ascending colon over 22 years were reviewed. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent pre-operative instrumental examinations: right-sided diverticulitis was recognized in five patients (two by barium enema, two by both ultrasonography and computerized tomography, one by all three examinations) and was suspected in another four. All diagnoses on merely clinical grounds--acute appendicitis in 10 patients and perforated peptic ulcer in one--were erroneous. Surgery consisted of 13 right standard or limited hemicolectomies, six conservative procedures and one Mickulicz' operation and subsequent right hemicolectomy. No operative deaths or long-term failures were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of clinical features atypical of acute appendicitis, right-sided colonic diverticulitis should be taken into account; pre-operative instrumental examinations might increase diagnostic accuracy, thereby leading to a more correct therapeutic approach.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.