SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Guidelines”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Heart failure clinical guideline. South African Medical Association Heart Failure Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: This Guideline targets chronic heart failure (CHF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The approach to both diagnosis and management of the CHF syndrome is included in this document. Although the aetiology of the heart failure may differ among the different racial groups (hypertension, end-stage rheumatic heart disease and idiopathic cardiomyopathy in black patients, and ischaemic heart disease in white, coloured and Indian patients), the end result is a dysfunctional left ventricle. The therapy applied is therefore applicable to a wide spectrum of CHF patients. This allows for the compilation of a CHF Guideline that is relevant to a large group of patients. All health care workers are targeted in this Guideline, although the general practitioner and specialist physician would probably gain the most from it. The clinical recognition of heart failure as well as its management is a difficult clinical problem and a primary care guideline will have to be a separate document, although the summary of this Guideline can be appreciated at a primary level of care. The motivation for the development of this guideline includes: Congestive heart failure is probably the most important cardiovascular condition that is still increasing in incidence and prevalence. A major problem is the clinical recognition of the heart failure syndrome, and this Guideline concentrates on outlining a practical approach to obtaining a history and doing a relevant examination. Unless the condition is correctly diagnosed, any recommendations on therapy lose their relevance. Numerous large, randomised, international, double-blind randomised trials are a feature of this condition and a Guideline giving clear recommendations for therapy based on these trials is crucial. The ordinary busy practitioner cannot be expected to read all these published studies and assimilate them into a coherent protocol of management. South Africa has not published a guideline on CHF that sets the standard of care that is considered acceptable. With the emergence of essential drug lists, managed health care groups and a more litigious society in South Africa, this Guideline will serve as the standard for the optimal management of CHF. OUTCOMES: Improvement in the quality of life, reduced CHF hospitalisations and mortality were the major considerations in the development of this Guideline. No economic analysis was made to assess cost-effective therapy, as this was not the brief of this document. The Directorate Medical Schemes, Supplies and Pharmaceutical Services (EDL) was a member of the working group. EVIDENCE: All the data were gathered from the published literature. Preference was given to the evidence provided by the numerous, large randomised CHF trials, the respective heart failure guidelines published by the European Society of Cardiology and the ACC/AHA Task Force and the clinical practice guidelines published by the US Department of Health and Human Services. An expert panel was then assembled and changes were made to the draft guideline both at a convened meeting and later on the basis of written comments following the distribution of a second draft. Where the evidence available was inconclusive or non-existent, a consensus of expert opinion was obtained. The most recent publications considered were published in 1997, but the literature was scanned on an ongoing basis for new data that may have changed the recommendations. METHODOLOGY/SPONSORSHIP: See Annexure B, p. 1155. RECOMMENDATIONS: A clear history should be obtained identifying the symptoms of the heart failure syndrome together with an attempt at identifying an aetiology and precipitating factor(s) underlying the syndrome. Clinical examination is emphasised, including identifying the three tenets of the clinical diagnosis of CHF (syndrome, aetiology, precipitating factor(s)). The CXR, ECG (resting, effort), selected blood tests are recommended as a routine in the diagnosis of CHF. Echocardiograph

Algorithms↗

PubMed1994

National standards and guidelines for pesticides in water, sediment, and aquatic organisms: application to water-quality assessments.

National standards and guidelines for pesticides can be useful tools in water-quality assessment for evaluating potential human health or ecological effects of measured pesticide residues in water, bed sediment, or aquatic organisms. However, valid use of a given standard or guideline requires an understanding of its technical basis and underlying assumptions. Each type of standard or guideline is specific for one sampling medium (water, bed sediment, and fish and shellfish tissue) and is aimed at protection of one or more beneficial uses of the hydrologic system (drinking water, fish and shellfish consumption, aquatic organisms, and wildlife). These characteristics can be used to identify which standards and guidelines are appropriate for comparison with measured pesticide concentrations in environmental samples from a given hydrologic system. A review of standards and guidelines can be restricted to the applicable sampling medium. Then, the beneficial uses of the hydrologic system need to be identified and the measured pesticide concentrations compared with standards and guidelines for all beneficial uses that apply to that system. Several key factors that must be considered when applying this general process to water-quality assessment are summarized below. Two precautions need to be considered regarding sampling media: 1. Standards and guidelines for water distinguish between finished drinking water (potable water, often treated) and ambient surface water. If standards and guidelines for drinking water (EPA primary drinking-water regulations and drinking-water health advisories) are applied to measured pesticide concentrations in ambient water samples, the effects of water treatment (such as filtration) need to be considered. 2. Standards and guidelines for fish and shellfish tissue distinguish between edible fish and shellfish tissue and whole fish tissue. Comparison of pesticide concentrations in whole fish tissue with standards or guidelines for edible fish and shellfish tissue is appropriate only as a screening procedure to determine whether additional sampling and analysis for contaminants in edible fish fillets are warranted. For some sampling media (water, fish and shellfish tissues), both standards and guidelines may exist for a given pesticide. Standards and guidelines may differ in their technical bases and in the implications or consequences of finding measured concentrations in exceedance of the standard or guideline value. Therefore, comparison of measured pesticide concentrations with both standards and guidelines is useful because each provides different information about the hydrologic system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Availability, content and quality of local guidelines for the assessment of suicide attempters in university and general hospitals in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate the availability, content and quality of local guidelines for the assessment of suicide attempters in the Netherlands. METHOD: All university and general hospitals in the Netherlands were asked to provide their local guidelines. Published national guidelines and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Education (AGREE) instrument were used to evaluate the content and quality of the local guidelines. RESULTS: Eighty-eight hospitals (90.7%) responded; 34 (38.6%) reported that they used local guidelines. Twenty-seven guidelines were submitted for evaluation. Most of the guidelines were more than 5 years old and had not been updated recently. The contents of the guidelines differed. Criteria addressing patient safety, staff attitude toward patients, reassessment of nonalert patients, relevant stressors, involvement of significant others and aftercare were found in less than 50% of the guidelines. Although psychiatric consultation was incorporated in almost 80%, the psychiatrist's tasks were specified infrequently. The guidelines seldom required monitoring of staff compliance. Only in the AGREE domain "clarity and presentation" was the mean score above 60% of the maximum. According to the instructions for the AGREE instrument, 10 (37.0%) of the 27 guidelines were recommended (with provisos or alterations) and 1 was strongly recommended for use in practice. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, a minority of hospitals reported use of local guidelines for the assessment of suicide attempters. When available, the guidelines were mostly not based on international standards, their contents varied greatly and their quality was unsatisfactory.

Attitude↗

PubMed1999

A strategy for developing practice guidelines for the ICU using automated knowledge acquisition techniques.

OBJECTIVES: To implement practice guideline entry tools in a reminder system in order to provide decision support to health care workers in clinical care and emergency care environments. To design a knowledge acquisition environment that enables physicians to formulate, update, and verify guidelines without the assistance of a knowledge engineer. METHODS: We developed a knowledge acquisition environment for the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) consisting of 1) a graphical knowledge acquisition tool, 2) tools that perform logical and semantic tests on proposed guidelines, 3) a Patient Data Management System (PDMS) containing clinical patient data, and 4) an expert system that reminds ICU health care workers of inconsistencies between a treatment plan and implemented guidelines. Physicians enter the guidelines using the knowledge acquisition tool, after which consistency and correctness tests are performed on the guidelines. The guidelines are then transferred to the knowledge base of the reminder system and validated by applying the new guidelines to a large stored data set of previous patients. If the new guidelines are approved, they are exported to the reminder system that is used in daily practice. RESULTS: ICU physicians used the knowledge acquisition tool to enter 58 guidelines into the reminder system's knowledge base. These guidelines were tested on a data set consisting of 803 previously admitted patients. As a result, 27 guidelines fired at least once, generating 406 reminders in total. Of the 406 generated reminders, 356 (88%) were issued correctly and 50 (12%) were false alarms. The reminders that were issued correctly involved 3 situations: 1) the database contained inconsistent or incomplete information, 2) the actions or decisions of the health care workers were not the most appropriate ones, and 3) there was a potential risk involved. All false alarms were caused by the fact that the corresponding guidelines were not specific enough to handle certain exceptions. As a result of this analysis, the guidelines could be improved in such a way as to eliminate all false alarms. CONCLUSIONS: These first results demonstrate that this bottom-up knowledge acquisition strategy, implemented by the automated knowledge acquisition tools, enables medical specialists to improve the quality of computer support in an ICU without assistance of a knowledge engineer.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2001

Publishing web-based guidelines using interactive decision models.

Commonly used methods for guideline development and dissemination do not enable developers to tailor guidelines systematically to specific patient populations and update guidelines easily. We developed a web-based system, ALCHEMIST, that uses decision models and automatically creates evidence-based guidelines that can be disseminated, tailored and updated over the web. Our objective was to demonstrate the use of this system with clinical scenarios that provide challenges for guideline development. We used the ALCHEMIST system to develop guidelines for three clinical scenarios: (1) Chlamydia screening for adolescent women, (2) antiarrhythmic therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death; and (3) genetic testing for the BRCA breast-cancer mutation. ALCHEMIST uses information extracted directly from the decision model, combined with the additional information from the author of the decision model, to generate global guidelines. ALCHEMIST generated electronic web-based guidelines for each of the three scenarios. Using ALCHEMIST, we demonstrate that tailoring a guideline for a population at high-risk for Chlamydia changes the recommended policy for control of Chlamydia from contact tracing of reported cases to a population-based screening programme. We used ALCHEMIST to incorporate new evidence about the effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and demonstrate that the cost-effectiveness of use of ICDs improves from $74 400 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained to $34 500 per QALY gained. Finally, we demonstrate how a clinician could use ALCHEMIST to incorporate a woman's utilities for relevant health states and thereby develop patient-specific recommendations for BRCA testing; the patient-specific recommendation improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by 37 days. The ALCHEMIST system enables guideline developers to publish both a guideline and an interactive decision model on the web. This web-based tool enables guideline developers to tailor guidelines systematically, to update guidelines easily, and to make the underlying evidence and analysis transparent for users.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Because there is increasing concern that economic data are not used in the clinical guideline development process, our objective was to evaluate the extent to which economic analyses are incorporated in guideline development. METHODS: We searched medline and HealthSTAR databases to identify English-language clinical practice guidelines (1996-1999) and economic analyses (1990-1998). Additional guidelines were obtained from The National Guidelines Clearinghouse Internet site available at http://www.guideline.gov. Eligible guidelines met the Institute of Medicine definition and addressed a topic included in an economic analysis. Eligible economic analyses assessed interventions addressed in a guideline and predated the guideline by 1 or more years. Economic analyses were defined as incorporated in guideline development if 1) the economic analysis or the results were mentioned in the text or 2) listed as a reference. The quality of economic analyses was assessed using a structured scoring system. RESULTS: Using guidelines as the unit of analysis, 9 of 35 (26%) incorporated at least 1 economic analysis of above-average quality in the text and 11 of 35 (31%) incorporated at least 1 in the references. Using economic analyses as the unit of analysis, 63 economic analyses of above-average quality had opportunities for incorporation in 198 instances across the 35 guidelines. Economic analyses were incorporated in the text in 13 of 198 instances (7%) and in the references in 18 of 198 instances (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous economic analyses may be infrequently incorporated in the development of clinical practice guidelines. A systematic approach to guideline development should be used to ensure the consideration of economic analyses so that recommendations from guidelines may impact both the quality of care and the efficient allocation of resources.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2002

Who writes guidelines, and who should?

AIM: To confirm or refute the impression that diagnostic radiology was often not represented on guideline writing committees, despite the fact that guidelines often made statements with implications for radiological practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We took two approaches. Firstly we examined all published Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines and extracted the disease topic, the number of authors and peer reviewers, the number that were radiologists, and independently decided whether, given the content, radiologist input at the writing or review stage was necessary. We also searched for all guidelines on management of stroke worldwide (a single disease topic with major radiological implications) and extracted the proportion of authors that were radiologists. RESULTS: Of 47 SIGN guidelines on different diseases, 11 (23%) had a radiologist in the authorship (13/594, 2.2% total authors), and 5/47 (11%) had a radiologist specialist reviewer (10/529, 1.8% total reviewers). Independent review of the guidelines' content suggested that 76% of guidelines should have had a radiologist author and 91% a radiologist reviewer (discrepancy 53% and 80% respectively). Amongst 22 guidelines on acute stroke management in the world literature with 202 authors (where stated), there were only two radiologists (1%), both on one guideline which was specifically to do with imaging of stroke (5% of all stroke guidelines identified). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic radiology is poorly represented on guideline writing committees, although frequently guidelines have implications for radiological practice. Radiologists should try to be more involved in guideline production.

Authorship↗

PubMed2003

[The significance of clinical guidelines for rehabilitation].

Clinical practice guidelines are relevant to all parties involved in the health system. For rehabilitation under the German pension insurance scheme, there are two main aspects: the integration of rehabilitation into the curative guidelines in terms of "local tailoring" on the one hand and the development of guidelines for rehabilitative processes, demand-oriented control of rehabilitation access, and rehabilitative aftercare on the other hand. The elaboration of effective standards is aimed at avoiding over-provision, under-provision or misdirected provision of care and, simultaneously, at ensuring that quality assured treatment is offered to the rehabilitees. Also, it is intended to increasingly implement evidence-based medicine in a sector of the health system in which research has so far been underrepresented. Implementation of guidelines in the rehabilitative sector will allow to disseminate existing knowledge in targeted manner, to systematically fill the gaps and to broaden the knowledge base as a whole. Furthermore, guidelines can facilitate integration of the different sectors in health care provision by operationalising the interfaces both with curative medicine and primary prevention. Throughout the process of guideline development for rehabilitation the specific characteristics of this sector must be kept in mind. Since therapeutic interventions are multidisciplinary and multimodal in nature guidelines have to be comprehensible and applicable for all members of the multiprofessional team. Corresponding to the relative paucity in rehabilitation research there is no sufficient evidence base for numerous therapeutic interventions. Accordingly, guidelines in rehabilitation will--initially--consist of a mixture of evidence- and consensus-based recommendations. Also, the specific goal of rehabilitation under the German pension insurance scheme, namely maintenance or recovery of the capacity at work, has to be borne in mind. There are many initiatives by the providers of rehabilitation as well as the scientific medical societies to develop and implement rehabilitative clinical practice guidelines, e. g. the guidelines programme of the BfA (Federal Insurance Institute for Salaried Employees), which is aimed at developing rehabilitation process guidelines for selected indications, the guidelines activities of the VDR (Federation of German Pension Insurance Institutes), and the input of the "Guidelines" commission of the DGRW (German Society of Rehabilitation Science). It is hoped that in the years to come the parties involved in German health care provision will be open to the advantages of clinical practice guidelines. Rehabilitation under the German pension insurance scheme, with respect to its experience with quality assurance, its responsibilities for structure and concept and a growing acceptance on the part of care providers, already holds a well-founded starting position.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

PubMed2003

Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.

BACKGROUND: International interest in clinical practice guidelines has never been greater but many published guidelines do not meet the basic quality requirements. There have been renewed calls for validated criteria to assess the quality of guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an international instrument for assessing the quality of the process and reporting of clinical practice guideline development. METHODS: The instrument was developed through a multi-staged process of item generation, selection and scaling, field testing, and refinement procedures. 100 guidelines selected from 11 participating countries were evaluated independently by 194 appraisers with the instrument. Following refinement the instrument was further field tested on three guidelines per country by a new set of 70 appraisers. RESULTS: The final version of the instrument contained 23 items grouped into six quality domains with a 4 point Likert scale to score each item (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, editorial independence). 95% of appraisers found the instrument useful for assessing guidelines. Reliability was acceptable for most domains (Cronbach's alpha 0.64-0.88). Guidelines produced as part of an established guideline programme had significantly higher scores on editorial independence and, after the publication of a national policy, had significantly higher quality scores on rigour of development (p<0.005). Guidelines with technical documentation had higher scores on that domain (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time an appraisal instrument for clinical practice guidelines has been developed and tested internationally. The instrument is sensitive to differences in important aspects of guidelines and can be used consistently and easily by a wide range of professionals from different backgrounds. The adoption of common standards should improve the consistency and quality of the reporting of guideline development worldwide and provide a framework to encourage international comparison of clinical practice guidelines.

Europe↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A normative analytic framework for development of practice guidelines for specific clinical populations.

BACKGROUND: A central problem in practice guideline development is how to develop guidelines that appropriately account for variations in clinical populations and practice settings. Despite recognition of this problem, there is no formal mechanism for assessing what the need is for flexibility in guidelines, or for deciding how to incorporate such flexibility into recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This research sought to provide a formal basis to determine when clinical circumstances vary sufficiently that guideline recommendations should differ, how recommendations should be tailored for a specific clinical setting, and whether the benefit associated with such site-specific guidelines justifies the expense of their development. RESULTS: The authors describe an approach for estimating the maximum health benefit that developers can obtain by eliminating uncertainty about differences in the patient populations and practice settings in which a guideline will be used. This estimate, the expected value of customization, provides a mechanism to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the development of site-specific guidelines that account explicitly for variation in clinical circumstances. Application of this method to the development of screening guidelines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection indicates that the development of site-specific guidelines potentially is cost-effective. Site-specific guidelines either improve, or leave unchanged, the efficiency of HIV screening; whether they increase or decrease total expenditures and health benefits depends on the choice of a cost-effectiveness threshold, and the clinical problem. CONCLUSIONS: Development of guideline recommendations based on decision models provides a normative approach for evaluating the need for and the cost-effectiveness of site-specific guidelines that have been tailored to specific practice settings. Such site-specific guidelines can improve substantially the expected health benefit and the economic efficiency of practice guidelines.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2006

Breaking new ground: challenging existing asthma guidelines.

BACKGROUND: While we have international guidelines and various national guidelines for asthma diagnosis and management, asthma remains poorly controlled in many children and adults. In this paper we review the limitations of current asthma guidelines and describe important issues and remaining questions regarding asthma guidelines for use, particularly in primary care. DISCUSSION: Clinical practice guidelines based on evidence from randomized controlled trials are considered the most rigorous and accurate. Current evidence-based guidelines are written predominantly from the perspective of the patient with a clear-cut asthma diagnosis, however, and tend not to consider the heterogeneity of asthma or to accommodate individual patient variations in response to treatment or their needs, differences in practice settings, or local differences in availability and cost of therapies. The results of randomized controlled trials, which are designed to establish efficacy of treatment under ideal conditions, may not apply to 'real-world' clinical practice, where patients are unselected, monitoring is less frequent, and effectiveness--the benefit of treatment in routine clinical practice--is the most relevant outcome. Moreover, most guidelines see asthma in isolation rather than considering other factors that may impact on asthma and response to asthma therapy, particularly age, allergic rhinitis, cigarette smoking, adherence, and genetic factors. When these links are recognized, guidelines rarely provide practical recommendations for treatment in these scenarios. Finally, there is some evidence that general practitioners are not convinced of the applicability of asthma guidelines to their practice settings, especially when those writing the guidelines principally work in specialist practice. CONCLUSION: Developing country-specific guidelines or, ideally, local guidelines could provide more practical solutions for asthma care and could account for regional factors that influence patient choice and adherence to therapy. Pragmatic clinical trials and well-designed observational trials are needed in addition to randomized controlled trials to assess real-world effectiveness of therapies, and such evidence needs also to be considered by guideline writers. Finally, practical tools to facilitate the diagnosis and assessment of asthma and factors responsible for poor control, such as associated allergic rhinitis, limited adherence, and smoking behavior, are needed to supplement treatment information provided in clinical practice guidelines for asthma.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Pediatricians' attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding clinical practice guidelines: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are increasingly being used for a wide variety of medical conditions, but not enough is known about physicians' attitudes and beliefs about guidelines, how often and under what circumstances they are used, and factors associated with their acceptance. OBJECTIVE: To determine practice guideline attitudes, beliefs, practices, and factors associated with use among a representative national sample of general pediatricians. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional mail survey. SUBJECTS: Random sample of general pediatrician members of the American Academy of Pediatrics residing in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. SURVEY INSTRUMENT: Twenty-four multiple-choice, Likert scale, yes-no, and open-ended questions about pediatric clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: From 1088 respondents, 461 specialists were excluded; the remaining 627 general pediatricians were mostly male (61%), white (81%), and in group practice (62%) in a suburban location (48%). Practice guidelines are used by 35% of pediatricians, in part by 44%, and not at all by 21%. Over 100 different practice guidelines are used, most commonly for asthma (77%), hyperbilirubinemia (27%), and otitis media (19%). Common reasons for use of practice guidelines include standardization of care (17%) and helpfulness (10%). Commonly cited problems with practice guidelines include failure to allow for clinical judgment (54%), use in litigation (16%), and limitation of autonomy (5%). In multivariate analysis, the odds of practice guideline use were greater among pediatricians in health maintenance organization practices (odds ratio [OR]: 9.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-68.0) and those who were nonwhite (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.8), but lower in those with more weekly patient visits (OR:.7; 95% CI:.5-.9). Features most likely to lead to practice guideline use include simplicity (16%), feasibility (12%), and evidence of improved outcomes (10%). Most pediatricians agree that practice guidelines improve outcomes (89%), are motivated by a desire to improve quality (94%), and should not be used in litigation (82%) or disciplinary actions (77%), nor be motivated by a desire to reduce costs (73%). CONCLUSIONS: Most general pediatricians use practice guidelines, but no specific guidelines, except those for asthma, are used by >27% of pediatricians. The results of this study suggest that practice guidelines are most likely to be followed if they are simple, flexible, rigorously tested, not used punitively, and are motivated by desires to improve quality, not reduce costs.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1997

Clinical practice guidelines in pediatric and newborn medicine: implications for their use in practice.

Clinical practice guidelines are becoming pervasive in pediatrics and newborn medicine. They have spanned a wide range of primary care practice parameters from treating otitis media with effusion, to performing complex surgery for congenital heart disease, and management of respiratory distress syndrome and coordinating discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. Administrators believe that using clinical practice parameters reduces health care costs, improves quality of care, and limits malpractice liability. Practice parameters and guidelines have grown in use because powerful interests-third-party payers, insurers, and health maintenance organizations, as well as hospital administrators bent on reducing variable costs of care and contracting for capitated care-champion their development, implementation, and monitoring. Economic credentialing of physicians with excessive variances without risk-adjusting for other than average patients is problematic and remains unchecked partly because of the fundamental characteristics of the evolving health care industry in which costs are more easily measured than quality. For highly autonomus physicians this standardization of medical decision making may represent a difficult transition into corporate practice by realigning traditional values of the doctor-patient relationship. However, because guidelines are almost certainly here to stay, pediatricians and neonatologists need to think critically about how their content and method of implementation, monitoring, and modification may influence medical teaching and decision making in the future. If guidelines are introduced primarily as a cost savings or containment tool that ignores the impact on the quality of care and restricts necessary care for infants and children, especially those with chronic illness or who are developmentally at risk, then neonatologists and pediatricians must be quick and determined to challenge the potentially damaging use of practice parameters or guidelines. Furthermore, there are many medicolegal implications of guideline implementation that may not favor physicians and leave to hospitals, insurers, and ultimately the courts decisions regarding evidence-based practice. In this review article, we pay special attention to the guidelines developed in newborn medicine. We discuss why and how guidelines are developed and critically evaluate the available evidence describing potential benefits and drawbacks of guidelines in general. There are legal implications to the implementation of guidelines, and guidelines may increase provider susceptibility to malpractice allegations. Neonatologists and pediatricians should critically analyze the following questions when guidelines are being developed: Are clinical practice parameters the most effective means to reduce the costs of health care, or improve the quality of health care services while reducing the need for and protecting physicians from malpractice suits? Or do clinical practice guidelines more closely resemble an audit system developed by health care organizations, insurers, and others including government-sponsored health care to appease powerful interests-with limited evidence for promise and perhaps potential negative cost, quality, and malpractice liability implications? In pediatric and newborn medicine there is limited evidence that guidelines have achieved the desired goals and further analysis of their process of care and the costs of implementation is warranted.

Health Services↗

PubMed1997

Attitudes about clinical practice guidelines in a mixed model HMO: the influence of physician and organizational characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses physician attitudes toward clinical practice guidelines, in an organization where guidelines have long been incorporated into the clinical practice. Attitudes toward institutional guidelines and guidelines in general are explored, and are compared to a published study describing attitudes among a sample of American College of Physician (ACP) members. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: A large, mixed model HMO. SAMPLE: Two hundred and three internists and family practice physicians. MEASURES: Attitudes toward perceived compliance with clinical practice guidelines were assessed. Summary measures of attitudes and anticipated impact of guidelines were created. RESULTS: Overall, attitudes toward practice guidelines among HMO physicians were very positive. Differences were observed by gender, practice model, years in practice and residency training. HMO physicians on average held more favorable attitudes toward guidelines compared with published results of an ACP survey. While HMO physicians in independent group practices viewed the concept of guidelines less favorably than staff model physicians, they were more likely to view the impact of guidelines positively than were the ACP physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to practice guidelines in the context of clinical practice can lead to positive attitudes about those guidelines. While resentment toward a system which relies on practice supports such as guidelines may remain among some physicians, this need not be inconsistent with an appreciation of the potential value of guidelines for improving clinical quality.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2000

[Conception and testing of a regional practice guideline using bronchial asthma as an example].

Frequently, there is a gap between publication and implementation of guidelines into clinical practice. To improve adherence with guidelines, experts recommend among other things local adaptation of guidelines. The goal of the present study was to conceptualize and test such an adaptation in the region of Neckar-Alb in Germany by using asthma guidelines as an example. We conceptualized a three-step approach for regional guideline adaptation: 1) Compilation of existing national and international asthma guidelines by regional experts to develop a draft for regional asthma guideline; 2) regional consensus conference to discuss the draft with local physicians; 3) modified Delphi procedure using regional physicians as "experts" to get consent for the regional asthma guideline. We defined consensus as reaching at least a 2/3 consent for each of the statements. As starting point for the process of guideline adaptation, the regional experts developed a first draft of the regional asthma guideline including 132 recommendations. 60 out of 500 regional general practitioners (GP), internists and asthma specialists participated in the consensus process. After the preparations of the regional experts and the regional consensus conference, only four recommendations had to be changed considerably during the Delphi procedure to reach the consensus criterion. If the recommendations remained unchanged, the whole guideline might be disapproved because they were considered to affect the role of GPs by shifting responsibilities from GPs to asthma specialists. As the result of the adaptation, the first regionally adapted asthma guideline for the Neckar-Alb region fosters the principal responsibility of regional GPs in asthma care, thereby surmounting resistance for implementation that former specialist-centered guidelines provoked. Hence, the new guideline meets the requirements for successfully implementing the recommendations into clinical practice.

Asthma↗

PubMed2000

A survey of guidelines in 27 EANM associated societies by the EANM Task Group on Quality Assurance and Standardisation. European Association of Nuclear Medicine.

The main aim of the EANM Task Group on Quality Assurance and Standardisation is to develop harmonised clinical procedures that are accepted within Europe. In order to achieve an evidence-based analysis of guidelines in the 27 EANM member societies, a survey was conducted. A questionnaire in mid 1999 investigated three major questions: (1) current status of national guidelines in EANM member societies, (2) specification of the cover and level of these national guidelines, and (3) future desires for national, EANM and SNM guidelines. The complete response rate was 96% (26/27). Guidelines are required by 19 of 27 member societies and have been initiated by 16 member societies. Guidelines are provided by 13 member societies, generally in the national language. In ten societies, specialists other than nuclear medicine physicians, mostly physicists and radiopharmacists, take the lead on some guidelines. Moreover, in some national societies there is active collaboration with other medical societies when writing guidelines, particularly cardiology societies. Currently, only 18% of the necessary procedure guidelines are covered. Compared with a survey conducted in 1993 by the EANM Committee on Quality Assurance and Standardisation, slow progress has been made in this regard, but compared with a survey conducted by the same committee in 1996 in 23 EANM member societies, the number of member societies providing guidelines has approximately doubled. Moreover, 26 of 27 member societies share a commitment for future development of guidelines and 21 of 27 prefer EANM guidelines to national guidelines. The results of this questionnaire justify the need for close co-operation between EANM, EANM member societies, the EANM Task Group on "Quality Assurance and Standardisation" and the Guideline Committee of the SNM. The clinical priorities are considered to be cardiac, renal and brain procedures.

Data Collection↗

PubMed2004

[Evaluation of hospital admissions: admission guidelines implementation in a pediatric emergency department].

OBJECTIVES: To develop and implement locally tailored pediatric admission guidelines for use in a pediatric emergency department and evaluate the appropriateness of admissions based on these guidelines. METHODOLOGY: Our Study was based on the development of admission guidelines by senior physicians, using the Delphi Consensus Process, for use in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) at Soroka University Medical Center (Soroka). We evaluated the appropriateness of admissions to the pediatric departments of Soroka on 33 randomly selected days in 1999 and 2000 prior to guideline implementation and 30 randomly selected days in 2001, after guideline implementation. A total of 1037 files were evaluated. FINDINGS: A rate of 12.4% inappropriate admissions to the pediatric departments was found based on locally tailored admission guidelines. There was no change in the rate of inappropriate admissions after implementation of admission guidelines in PED. Inappropriate admissions were associated with age above 3 years, hospital stay of two days or less and the season. The main reasons for evaluating an admission as inappropriate were that the admission did not comply with the guidelines and that the case could be managed in an ambulatory setting. There were distinctive differences in the characteristics of the Bedouin and Jewish populations admitted to the pediatric departments, although no difference was found in the rate of inappropriate admissions between these populations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient management in Soroka PED is tailored to the conditions of this medical center and to the characteristics of the population it serves. The admission guidelines developed reflect these special conditions. Lack of change in the rate of inappropriate admissions following implementation of the guidelines indicates that the guidelines reflect the physicians' approach to patient management that existed in Soroka PED prior to guideline implementation. Hospital admission guidelines have a role in the health management system; however, these guidelines must be tailored to reflect local characteristics and needs.

Arabs↗

PubMed2004

Transforming written guidelines into electronic formats--international perspectives.

The Guidelines International Network (G-1-N www.g-i-n.net) is a major new international initiative involving guideline-developing organisations from around the world. G-I-N seeks to improve the quality of health care by promoting systematic development of clinical practice guidelines and their application into practice. The Network now has over 45 international members, most of whom prepare evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, or actively promote the use of evidence in practice. One of the priorities of the organisation is to share evidence tables and adapt guidelines for local circumstances based on international evidence. In the longer term, guideline developers are planning to create 'living guidelines' that can be continuously updated and used by a number of different countries. A major consideration for guideline developers is how to communicate and work with information technology scientists to develop standards and protocols for the translation of these trans-national guidelines into electronic formats. To be effective, there must be formal internationally agreed standards that allow electronic guidelines to be shared and automatically updated. The Guidelines International Network will be taking a leading international role in working with designers and vendors of electronic decision support systems and tools to guarantee the integrity of guidelines when translated into electronic formats. This presentation by Catherine Marshall, Kitty Rosenbrand and Guenter Ollenschlaeger will: --explore current experiences from New Zealand, Germany and the Netherlands --identify issues from the perspective of guideline developers --make recommendations for establishing opportunities for software designers, vendors and informatics experts to collaborate with guideline developers to ensure that up to date evidence can be easily implemented and shared throughout the world.

Decision Support Techniques↗