PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cancer screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 757 records · Page 42Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Strategies for reducing breast cancer mortality in western countries have focused on screening, at least for women aged 50 to 69 years. One of the requirements of any community screening program is to achieve a high participation rate, which is related to methods of invitation. Therefore, it was decided to systematically review the scientific evidence on the different strategies aimed at improving women's participation in breast cancer screening programs and activities. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of different strategies for increasing the participation rate of women invited to community (population-based) breast cancer screening activities or mammography programs. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (1966-2000), CENTRAL (2000), and EMBASE (1998-1999) searches for 1966 to 1999 were supplemented by reports and letters to the European Screening Breast Cancer Programs (Euref Network). SELECTION CRITERIA: Both published and unpublished trials were eligible for inclusion, provided the women had been invited to a community breast screening activity or program and had been randomised to an intervention group or a control group with no active intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified 151 articles, which were reviewed independently by two people. The discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer in order to reach consensus. Thirty-four studies were excluded because they lacked a control group; 58 of the other 117 articles were considered as opportunistic and not community-based; 59 articles, which reported 70 community-based randomised controlled trials or clinical controlled trials, were accepted. In 24 of these, the control group had not been exposed to any active intervention, but 8 of the 24 had to be excluded because the denominator for estimating attendance was unknown. At the end, 16 studies constituted the material for this review, although two studies were further excluded because their groups were not comparable at baseline. Data from all but one study were based on or converted to an intention-to-treat analysis. Attendance in response to the mammogram invitation was the main outcome measure. MAIN RESULTS: The evidence favoured five active strategies for inviting women into community breast cancer screening services: letter of invitation (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.92), mailed educational material (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.96 to 4.02), letter of invitation plus phone call (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.02 to 3.18), phone call (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.23), and training activities plus direct reminders for the women (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.50). Home visits did not prove to be effective (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.80 to 1.40) and letters of invitation to multiple examinations plus educational material favoured the control group (OR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.32 to 1.20). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Most active recruitment strategies for breast cancer screening programs examined in this review were more effective than no intervention. Combinations of effective interventions can have an important effect. Some costly strategies, as a home visit and a letter of invitation to multiple screening examinations plus educational material, were not effective. Further reviews comparing the effective interventions and studies that include cost-effectiveness, women's satisfaction and equity issues are needed.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

An assessment of rural women's knowledge, constraints and perceptions on cervical cancer screening: the case of two districts in Zimbabwe.

This paper gives a sociological and anthropological insight into the rural women's perceptions and understanding of cervical symptomatology, screening and cancer. Qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with women and health personnel. Quantitative data was obtained through questionnaires administered to 356 women from Mutoko and Shurugwi districts. The study revealed that cervical cancer is a disease that is of concern among health practitioners and women. 95.78% of the interviewed women had never gone for screening and had little knowledge about the various aspects of the disease in terms of causes, prevention and treatment. The study made four recommendations: the need for national screening policy and programme to be put in place, health education to women about cervical cancer, use of VIA in low resource settings and sensitisation of women about the availability of screening facilities in the districts where programmes are in place.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Hormone replacement therapy and the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening: a review.

BACKGROUND: The use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is prevalent in the age group invited to routine breast cancer screening in many countries. Previous publications have reported reduced sensitivity and specificity of mammographic breast cancer screening associated with current use of HRT. OBJECTIVES: To review the epidemiological evidence for the relation between use of HRT and the risk of having breast cancer diagnosed between screens (interval breast cancer--sensitivity) and being recalled for assessment after initial mammography with no diagnosis of breast cancer at that screen (false positive recall--specificity). METHODS: Overview of published literature. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, providing a total of 367 interval cancers and 8878 cases of false positive recall, in women of 50 and over. Overall, the studies showed an increased risk of interval cancer and false positive recall in current users of HRT compared with non-users. Only one study accounted for the essential confounding factors of age and menopause. Furthermore, information on duration and recency of HRT use was not available for most studies. CONCLUSIONS: Studies to date indicate that women using HRT are more likely to experience reduced sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening, compared with women not using HRT. However, because results have not been adjusted for crucial confounding factors, the magnitude of these effects is uncertain.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Breast cancer screening programmes--results of studies in foreign countries--situation in Belgium.

Results of randomized trials and case-control studies on breast cancer screening are reviewed. A combined analysis of data from the randomized studies indicates that a mortality reduction (29%) can be achieved by mammographic screening in women. Regular breast cancer screening by mammography for women aged 50-69 years reduces breast cancer mortality by 40% (confidence interval [CI] 95% about 27-55) in women who are screened at least once. In younger women, the results are inconclusive. The programme Europe against Cancer has recommended the setting-up of a network of pilot studies on breast cancer screening by mammography in the European Community in order to obtain the necessary experience, with a view to implementation of a national screening programme before the year 2000. In the Brussels project, the main objective is to develop a programme of quality assurance. In Belgium, there are other projects with different designs, for which the results are not yet available.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Black participation in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

The primary goal of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial is to learn whether widespread use of screening tests to detect these cancers will reduce associated mortality. Blacks have the highest age-adjusted cancer incidence and mortality rates of any population group in the United States, but several barriers to their participation in clinical research such as the PLCO trial exist. These barriers involve sociocultural, economic, and individual factors, as well as factors inherent in trial designs. Population diversity in the PLCO trial is necessary to preserve scientific validity and generalizability of trial results. Therefore, the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are collaborating to ensure adequate representation of blacks in the PLCO trial. For example, the agencies have funded several new activities designed to better understand and overcome barriers to participation in the trial. These activities include the African American Men Project, a randomized trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of three increasingly intensive recruitment interventions in recruiting black men; the establishment of a minority-focused PLCO trial screening center, a study to identify factors that influenced the decisions of black women recruited to participate in the PLCO trial; and a study to examine the psychosocial factors that influence blacks' decision making to engage in cancer screening and participation in research similar to the PLCO trial. The results of these activities will allow for a more thorough examination of cancer-related issues of importance to blacks and will help shed light on factors that influence their decisions to participate in cancer screening and prevention clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Breast cancer: screening and early detection.

A comprehensive program for breast cancer screening and early detection has a number of components. First, an understanding of the magnitude of the breast cancer problem and the natural history of breast cancer is essential. Appropriate screening guidelines must be identified and adopted into practice. Screening recommendations must be promoted actively. While breast cancer screening guidelines can be applied broadly to the general population, patients who are at increased risk must be identified through formal risk assessment. For those at increased risk, earlier screening and prevention strategies can be recommended. Physicians must be prepared to manage the abnormalities identified in screening and make appropriate referrals for treatment. Finally, patients identified with cancer must be staged accurately, as this staging will determine the prognosis.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future research.

In this paper we review the published literature with respect to cervical cancer screening intervention research. Mass media campaigns appear to work best in promoting cervical cancer screening when multiple media are used, when they promote specific screening programs that eliminate or reduce access barriers, or when they are used in combination with other strategies. Many positive examples of using outreach staff to promote cervical cancer screening, as well as using mobile examination rooms in the community, were found. Substantial evidence that letters mailed to patient populations are efficacious was found, especially in promoting interval screening; however, bulk mailings to nonpatient populations have generally not been successful. Both physician and patient prompts have shown promise as well as opportunistic screenings in both the outpatient and the inpatient settings. In addition, several strategies for reducing loss to follow-up among women with abnormal test results were identified, including telephone follow-up, educational mailouts, audiovisual programs, clinic-based educational presentations and workshops, transportation incentives, and economic vouchers. Of special note is the success of other countries in establishing centralized recall systems to promote interval screening for cervical cancer. Ultimately, such systems could replace the need for opportunistic screening in underserved populations and perhaps many community outreach efforts. It is argued that health departments represent a logical starting point for developing a network of recall systems in the United States for underserved women.

Female↗
PubMed2000

Prostate cancer screening trends of New York State men at least 50 years of age, 1994 to 1997.

BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of consensus on prostate cancer screening recommendations, men are being screened at high rates in some states. Our objective was to examine the trends in prostate cancer screening awareness and practices from 1994 through 1997 and the relationship among screening practices and demographic characteristics, perceived risk, and family history of prostate cancer. METHODS: Data from the New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys and questionnaire modules on prostate cancer screening were used for this study, which excluded men younger than 50 years of age and men with a history of prostate cancer. The questionnaires were administered by random-digit-dialed monthly telephone surveys of the civilian, noninstitutionalized adult population in New York State. RESULTS: A total of 295, 336, 273, and 448 men, the vast majority of whom were white, met the study criteria for 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively. Each year the percentage of men who reported having heard of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test increased (test for trend, P < 0.001). Among those who had heard of the PSA test, the percentage who reported having had a PSA test increased steadily from 1994 to 1997. About 30% of the men in each year's study did not have an impression of their risk of getting prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Given the increasing rate at which men are reporting being screened for prostate cancer and given their reported perceived risk levels, perhaps more needs to be done to educate men about screening implications and personal risk for prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

[Lung cancer screening -- state of the art].

Besides smoking as the main risk factor for lung cancer several occupational risk factors like exposure to asbestos, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, uranium and dust containing nickel or silica have to be considered. Due to lack of effort in smoking prevention and cessation, lung cancer screening is an important issue. A number of pitfalls has to be considered when evaluating the efficacy of screening procedures. In this paper, we summarize the results of the major studies including chest X-ray, sputum cytology and low dose computed tomography. Randomized controlled studies involving low dose CT in about 100 000 subjects are on the way. Around the year 2010 we will be able to define whether or not lung cancer screening including new techniques and standardized algorithms yields a decrease in mortality. If diagnostic algorithms are used which have been applied in published feasibility studies, the mean percentage of invasive diagnostic measures revealing benign lesions is about 34 % and thus below those obtained in, e. g., breast cancer screening trials.

Germany↗
PubMed2005

Cancer screening among Native Americans in eastern North Carolina.

The purpose of the study is to explore cancer screening predictors and practices among Lumbee Indians in eastern North Carolina. Interviewers from the community conducted phone interviews with 333 men and 456 women aged 40 and older randomly selected from the Lumbee Tribal roll as part of the Lumbee Diabetes and Health Survey. The survey has sections on demographic information and health conditions, family history of chronic conditions, and health behaviors. This paper reports on cancer screening behaviors. Rates of ever being screened for breast, cervical, prostate and colon cancer were relatively high compared with overall national rates. Predictors included younger age, better health, more education, and lifestyle factors such as engaging in regular physical activity and not smoking. Future research should focus on developing culturally appropriate campaigns to increase the frequency of cancer screening to conform to guidelines, and educational programs and interventions to reach Lumbee Indians most at risk for not being screened.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Colorectal cancer screening in North Carolina: associations with diabetes mellitus and demographic and health characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) may increase the risk of colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer death in the United States. This report examines factors associated with colorectal cancer screening, including DM status. METHODS: Data from the 1993/1995/1997 North Carolina (NC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were analyzed to assess self-reported screening rates within guidelines for sigmoidoscopy/proctoscopy (sig/proct) and fecal occult blood test (FOBT). RESULTS: Overall, 28.6, 27.2, and 19.7% received a sig/proct, FOBT, or either test within guidelines, respectively. Screening rates varied according to some demographic variables, but not by DM status. However, DM status changed some relationships between screening and some demographic/health characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening in NC is similar to national rates, but certain subgroups are less likely to get screened. Persons with DM are as likely to get colorectal cancer screening, but some groups with DM (ethnic minorities, persons of low socioeconomic status) may be at high risk for not getting screened. Educational efforts to increase screening should target these groups.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed1991

Oral cancer screening in the elderly.

Oral cancers represent approximately 3% of all cancers diagnosed in the United States. Oral cancer is one-fifth as common as cancer of the breast, colon, and lung but more than twice as common as cervical cancer. Incidence rates for oral cancer are highest among older men. Epidemiologic data identify alcohol and tobacco as major risk factors associated with the disease. Screening for oral cancer is a simple, non-invasive procedure which can be easily incorporated into the comprehensive assessment of older patients. Oral cancer screening can detect early, localized lesions which are associated with an improved prognosis. Five-year survival rates are more than four times greater in individuals with localized lesions than those with distant metastases. Since older Americans visit their physician more often than their dentist, the physician's medical examination provides an excellent opportunity to screen for oral cancers.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Bowel cancer screening in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Modern screening tools have the potential to decrease mortality and morbidity from bowel cancer, the second commonest cause of cancer death. The evaluation of the recent National Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot Program (NBCSPP) in Australia has prompted the commonwealth government to fund the first phase of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in May 2006. OBJECTIVE: This article discusses the evidence for bowel cancer screening and the outcomes of the NBCSPP. DISCUSSION: Inexpensive tests are available to detect bleeding from the large bowel, a stronger indicator of early bowel cancer than symptoms, and pilot projects confirm their feasibility and acceptability in Australia. A doctor's recommendation strongly influences individual participation in screening. The medical profession are more likely to support an organised screening program if they are informed on the evidence on which the screening program is based.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Early gastric cancer and early colon cancer detected simultaneously by PET cancer screening incidentally.

We report a case of early gastric cancer and early colon cancer detected by positron emission tomography (PET) cancer screening. A 64-year-old male patient with an unremarkable past history except for hypertension and cerebrovascular disease underwent 18F-FDG PET for cancer screening. Images revealed increased uptake in the gastric antrum and sigmoid colon. Both areas appeared suspicious for neoplasm on subsequent fluoroscopy and endoscopy, and biopsies were positive for neoplasia at both sites. The gastric lesion was treated by distal gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy and the colon cancer by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Both surgical specimens were positive for cancer.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

Canadian physicians' choices for their own colon cancer screening.

INTRODUCTION: Compliance with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Canada is low. The aim of the present survey was to determine whether Canadian physicians older than 50 years were pursuing colon cancer screening. Specifically, physicians were asked to identify their modality of choice and identify their barriers to screening. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to members, older than 50 years, of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine, the Canadian Psychiatric Association and the Canadian Association of Radiologists. RESULTS: Of 2,807 surveys, 46% were returned. Screening for CRC was reported by 53% of respondents. The Canadian Association of Radiologists members (61%) and the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology members (61%) were more likely to be screened than other specialties (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively). Members of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (44%) were least likely to be screened (P<0.001). Men (P<0.001) and Ontario physicians (P<0.01) were more likely to be screened than women and Canadian physicians from other provinces, respectively. Colonoscopy (56%) was the most common screening modality used, followed by fecal occult blood testing (27%). Respondents who had not been screened cited a lack of personal time (47%) and insufficient data to warrant screening (14%). DISCUSSION: More than one-half of all respondents were screened for CRC. Colonoscopy is the most common screening modality used. Lack of time is the most common reason cited for not participating in CRC screening.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

The objectives of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial are to determine in screenees ages 55-74 at entry whether screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy (60-cm sigmoidoscope) can reduce mortality from colorectal cancer, whether screening with chest X-ray can reduce mortality from lung cancer, whether screening men with digital rectal examination (DRE) plus serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can reduce mortality from prostate cancer, and whether screening women with CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) can reduce mortality from ovarian cancer. Secondary objectives are to assess screening variables other than mortality for each of the interventions including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value; to assess incidence, stage, and survival of cancer cases; and to investigate biologic and/or prognostic characterizations of tumor tissue and biochemical products as intermediate endpoints. The design is a multicenter, two-armed, randomized trial with 37,000 females and 37,000 males in each of the two arms. In the intervention arm, the PSA and CA125 tests are performed at entry, then annually for 5 years. The DRE, TVU, and chest X-ray exams are performed at entry and then annually for 3 years. Sigmoidoscopy is performed at entry and then at the 5-year point. Participants in the control arm follow their usual medical care practices. Participants will be followed for at least 13 years from randomization to ascertain all cancers of the prostate, lung, colorectum, and ovary, as well as deaths from all causes. A pilot phase was undertaken to assess the randomization, screening, and data collection procedures of the trial and to estimate design parameters such as compliance and contamination levels. This paper describes eligibility, consent, and other design features of the trial, randomization and screening procedures, and an outline of the follow-up procedures. Sample-size calculations are reported, and a data analysis plan is presented.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and physician preferences in regard to 5 colorectal cancer screening alternatives endorsed by a 1997 expert panel, determine the impact of patient and physician values regarding certain test features on screening preference, and assess physicians' perceptions of patients' values. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A general internal medicine practice at an academic medical center in 1998. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=217; 76% response rate) and physicians (N=39; 87% response rate) at the study setting. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients preferred fecal occult blood testing (43%) or colonoscopy (40%). In patients for whom accuracy was the most important test feature, colonoscopy (62%) was the preferred screening method. Patients for whom invasive test features were more important preferred fecal occult blood testing (76%; P <.001). Patients and physicians were similar in their values regarding the various test features. However, there was a significant difference between physicians' perceptions of which test features were important to patients compared with the patients' actual responses (P <.001). The largest discrepancy was for accuracy (patient actual 54% vs physician opinion 15%) and discomfort (patient actual 15% vs physician opinion 64%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients have distinct preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests that are associated with the importance placed on certain test features. Physicians incorrectly perceive those factors that are important to patients. Physicians should incorporate patient values in regard to certain test features when discussing colorectal cancer screening with their patients and when eliciting their screening preferences.

Adult↗