PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prostate Cancer”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 757 records · Page 42Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Prostasome-derived proteins capable of eliciting an immune response in prostate cancer patients.

Prostate cancer consistently remains a difficult clinical enigma. Therefore, the development of novel strategies for diagnosis and treatment (e.g. immunotherapy) of prostate cancer is essential. We tried to identify the prostasome-derived proteins that were immunogenic in prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer patients' sera (n = 44) with high enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) titers against prostasomes were selected for immunoblotting against purified seminal prostasomes. The SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting experiments were performed with Bio-Rad systems. Twenty-five of the recognized proteins were isolated and analyzed by means of mass spectrometry. Out of 44 patients' sera, 31 (70%) demonstrated in immunoblotting experiments reactivity against several prostasomal protein bands in the molecular weight range of 10-200 kDa. Some of the bands (55, 70 and 170 kDa) were more frequently recognized by the patients' sera. Concomitantly run control sera generated only very weak or no bands at all. The most frequently occurring prostasomal proteins were identified as heat shock proteins (HSP 70, 71) and clusterin. This study identified the most important molecular targets of autoantibodies against prostasomes generated in connection with the development of prostate cancer in man. These immunogenic prostasomal proteins could be appropriate target molecules for specific immunotherapy of prostate cancer patients.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2003

Voltage-gated Na+ channels confer invasive properties on human prostate cancer cells.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in American males, resulting in an estimated 37,000 deaths annually, typically the result of metastatic disease. A consequence of the unsuccessful androgen ablation therapy used initially to treat metastatic disease is the emergence of androgen-insensitive prostate cancer, for which there is currently no prescribed therapy. Here, three related human prostate cancer cell lines that serve as a model for this dominant form of prostate cancer metastasis were studied to determine the correlation between voltage-gated sodium channel expression/function and prostate cancer metastatic (invasive) potential: the non-metastatic, androgen-dependent LNCaP LC cell line and two increasingly tumorogenic, androgen-independent daughter cell lines, C4 and C4-2. Fluorometric in vitro invasion assays indicated that C4 and C4-2 cells are more invasive than LC cells. Immunoblot analysis showed that voltage-gated sodium channel expression increases with the invasive potential of the cell line, and this increased invasive potential can be blocked by treatment with the specific voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitor, tetrodotoxin (TTX). These data indicate that increased voltage-gated sodium channel expression and function are necessary for the increased invasive potential of these human prostate cancer cells. When the human adult skeletal muscle sodium channel Na(v1.4) was expressed transiently in each cell line, there was a highly significant increase in the numbers of invading LC, C4, and C4-2 cells. This increased invasive potential was reduced to control levels by treatment with TTX. These data are the first to indicate that the expression of voltage-gated sodium channels alone is sufficient to increase the invasive potential of non-metastatic (LC cells) as well as more aggressive cells (i.e., C4 and C4-2 cells). Together, the data suggest that increased voltage-gated sodium channel expression alone is necessary and sufficient to increase the invasive potential of a set of human prostate cancer cell lines that serve as a model for prostate cancer metastasis.

Cell Line, Tumor↗
PubMed2006

Prostate cancer epidemiology.

Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer among men in most western populations, and it is the second leading cause of cancer death among U.S. men. Despite its high morbidity, the etiology of prostate cancer remains largely unknown. Advancing age, race, and a family history of prostate cancer are the only established risk factors. Many putative risk factors, including androgens, diet, physical activity, sexual factors, inflammation, and obesity, have been implicated, but their roles in prostate cancer etiology remain unclear. It is estimated that as much as 42% of the risk of prostate cancer may be accounted for by genetic influences, including individual and combined effects of rare, highly penetrant genes, more common weakly penetrant genes, and genes acting in concert with each other. Numerous genetic variants in the androgen biosynthesis/metabolism, carcinogen metabolism, DNA repair, and chronic inflammation pathways, have been explored, but the results are largely inconclusive. The pathogenesis of prostate cancer likely involves interplay between environmental and genetic factors. To unravel these complex relationships, large well-designed interdisciplinary epidemiologic studies are needed. With newly available molecular tools, a new generation of large-scale multidisciplinary population-based studies is beginning to investigate gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Results of these studies may lead to better detection, treatment, and, ultimately, prevention of prostate cancer.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2003

REPS2/POB1 is downregulated during human prostate cancer progression and inhibits growth factor signalling in prostate cancer cells.

During progression of prostate cancer, cellular changes occur, leading to a transition from androgen-dependent to androgen-independent growth. One aspect of this transition is a switch from androgens to growth factors, like epidermal growth factor (EGF), as primary regulators of proliferation. We examined the involvement of REPS2/POB1 in this process. REPS2/POB1 is an EH domain-containing protein, reported to be involved in signalling via RalBP1 and to play a role in endocytosis of EGF receptors. Furthermore, the protein is relatively highly expressed in androgen-dependent as compared to androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts. Next to the known REPS2/POB1 protein, an open reading frame encoding REPS2/POB1, with 139 additional amino-acid residues at the NH(2)-terminus, was cloned and found to be expressed in prostate cancer cells. Overexpression, by transient transfection, of both forms of REPS2/POB1 in prostate cancer cell lines, induced apoptosis within 48 h. At shorter time intervals after transfection, signalling towards a TPA response element luciferase reporter was found to be inhibited. From these experiments, it is concluded that REPS2/POB1, through its influence on the Ral signalling pathway, is involved in growth factor signalling. Decreased expression of REPS2/POB1 during progression of prostate cancer may therefore result in loss of control of growth factor signalling and consequently in loss of control of cell proliferation.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed1992

Treatment of advanced localised prostatic cancer by orchiectomy, radiotherapy, or combined treatment. A Medical Research Council Study. Urological Cancer Working Party--Subgroup on Prostatic Cancer.

A total of 277 patients with apparently localised prostatic cancer (T2-T4 NXMO) were allocated at random to receive radiotherapy alone (88), orchiectomy alone (90) and combined therapy (99) between 1980 and 1985. The main outcome measures were survival, time to appearance of metastases and treatment of local disease progression by further transurethral resection. Orchiectomy, whether alone or with radiotherapy, produced a significant delay in detection of metastases when compared with radiotherapy alone. There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 treatment groups in local disease control or in overall survival.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed2006

Current and future status of prostate cancer chemoprevention.

Prostate cancer remains one of the most common malignancies in Western countries and is also increasing in Asian countries. The high incidence, influence of environmental factors, such as androgen, and extended natural history of prostate cancer provide multiple opportunities for prevention; therefore prostate cancer is an ideal candidate for chemoprevention. The development of chemoprevention strategies against prostate cancer would have a huge impact, both medically and economically. Large-scale clinical trials suggest that some agents can prevent the development of prostate cancer. Active research into chemoprevention is ongoing and gathered evidence will provide effective and safe strategies to prevent prostate cancer. This review will highlight the present status of prostate cancer chemoprevention and other mechanisms of prevention, as well as discussing the issues to be addressed.

Antioxidants↗
PubMed2026

Ubiquitination-Androgen Receptor Coupling in Prostate Cancer Therapeutics.

Prostate cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in men and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The androgen receptor (AR) remains the principal driver of prostate cancer progression and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), with its stability, localization, and transcriptional activity being tightly regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). E3 ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases (DUBs) critically govern AR turnover and signalling output, thereby influencing tumour growth, therapeutic resistance, and disease progression. Emerging evidence further highlights a complex interplay between ubiquitination, DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, and ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) signalling, collectively shaping genomic stability and treatment responsiveness in prostate cancer. This review is organized into four major themes: (i) ubiquitin-mediated regulation of AR signalling, (ii) ubiquitination and DNA damage response in AR-driven prostate cancer, (iii) crosstalk between ubiquitination, ADPr, and AR-associated signalling pathways, and (iv) therapeutic strategies targeting the UPS and AR axis. This study also discusses recent advances in targeted protein degradation, modulation of E3 ligases, inhibition of deubiquitinases, and PARP-based therapeutic approaches. These emerging insights into the interconnected regulation of ubiquitination, AR signalling, DDR pathways, and ADP-ribosylation may facilitate the development of next-generation therapeutic approaches for advanced prostate cancer.

ADP-ribosylation (ADPr)↗
PubMed2003

Molecular pathways to prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer continues to be a prevalent disease in the United States and western countries. Advances in the fields of molecular biology and genetics coupled with new developments in biotechnology have increased our understanding of events associated with the initiation and progression of prostate cancer. We reviewed recent scientific discoveries relating to genetic predisposition, somatic alterations and epigenetic phenomena involved in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports published in the scientific literature with relevance to the molecular biology, genetics and epigenetics of prostate cancer were identified using the MEDLINE data base. Particular emphasis was placed on articles that investigated the contribution of somatic alterations to prostate cancer. RESULTS: A multitude of genes have recently been identified that are believed to be relevant to prostate carcinogenesis. A contemporary model for prostate cancer progression should include the potential contribution of inflammation to the development of preneoplastic or neoplastic lesions. Abnormal methylation of important growth regulatory or caretaker genes represents an alternative pathway to cancer in addition to aneuploidy, loss of heterozygosity and gene mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of molecular markers specific to early and late events in prostate cancer progression is critical for the development of improved detection and prognostication strategies. While there is evidence to support the association between inflammation and prostate cancer, the exact mechanisms by which these processes occur are not well defined. The significant contribution of somatic and epigenetic defects to prostate carcinogenesis underscores the need to develop therapeutic approaches that specifically target these molecular alterations.

DNA Methylation↗
PubMed2005

Prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

After skin cancer, prostate cancer (CaP) is the most common cancer diagnosed in men. As a result of screening with prostate-specific antigen, CaP is being caught earlier than it was in the past. This has led to an increase in cure rates across all treatment modalities. There are no firm, reproducible data that demonstrate the superiority of one modality over another. The expectations for cure should be approximately 90% for low-risk patients and approximately 80% for intermediate-risk patients, regardless of treatment modality. The toxicity of available treatment modalities discriminates among them. All modalities have acute toxicity of similar severity; however, prostate brachytherapy (PI) has the least amount of long-term toxicity when compared with external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. Therefore, a patient who is confronted with the diagnosis of CaP is counseled to choose among the modalities based on the toxicity rather than the efficacy of the treatment options available. Adopting this evidence-based algorithm has led to the increased application of PI.

Antineoplastic Protocols↗
PubMed1995

Risk of cancer in relatives of prostate cancer probands.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that there will be more than 244,000 new prostate cancer cases diagnosed and that more than 40,000 men will die of this disease during 1995. Evidence exists for a hereditary predisposition to prostate cancer, but the proportion of cases attributable to the inheritance of a specific gene or genes is not large. Some hereditary cancer syndromes involve more than one tumor site, and some studies have reported a familial association between prostate cancer and other cancers. The presence of other cancers in prostate cancer families may indicate a specific type of hereditary predisposition. PURPOSE: We studied families that were selected because of the presence of prostate cancer to determine whether hereditary prostate cancer is associated with cancers at other sites and possibly with other heritable cancer syndromes. METHODS: Data from two distinct study populations were studied retrospectively. The first population consisted of 690 case patients undergoing radical prostatectomy who were not selected for family history of prostate cancer and 640 control subjects who were the spouses or female companions of the case patients. The second population consisted of 75 multiplex families (i.e., families with multiple cases of prostate cancer) referred because they fulfilled the criteria for hereditary prostate cancer. A comparison between case and control populations for the occurrence of 14 aggregated groups of cancer was performed. Data were analyzed using Poisson regression, and relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Brothers and fathers of prostate cancer probands have a statistically significant higher risk of prostate cancer than the male first-degree relatives of control subjects (RR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.28-2.43). Therefore, the risk for prostate cancer is 76% higher among first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients compared with first-degree relatives of control subjects. This higher risk was not modified by an occurrence of breast cancer in the pedigree. Also, a statistically significant higher risk was found for tumors of the central nervous system in hereditary families (RR = 3.02; 95% CI = 1.08-8.41). Statistically significant higher risks of cancer at other major sites, such as breast, ovary, or endometrium were not observed in these families. CONCLUSIONS: Even among families that were specifically selected because of the presence of prostate cancer, risks for cancer at other sites appeared not to be increased. Therefore, hereditary prostate cancer appears to be a relatively site-specific disease, and it does not seem to be a part of other hereditary cancer syndromes.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Elevated 12-lipoxygenase mRNA expression correlates with advanced stage and poor differentiation of human prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in males in the United States. The mortality is due mainly to distant metastasis. Therefore, predicting the prognosis of prostate cancer patients is an important clinical problem. Previously, we demonstrated that a 12-lipoxygenase (12-LOX) metabolite of arachidonic acid, 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, enhances the invasiveness of prostate cancer cells and that a 12-LOX-selective inhibitor [N-benzyl-N-hydroxy-5-phenylpentanamide] reduces experimental metastasis in animal model systems. In this study, we investigated the potential of 12-LOX as a predictor for the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. METHODS: The mRNA expression level of 12-LOX in 122 matching prostate normal and cancerous tissues were measured by quantitative reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction. Possible association between 12-LOX expression and histologic grade, pathologic and clinical stage, margin positivity, age, and race was analyzed. RESULTS: 12-LOX mRNA levels were elevated in cancer cells and the expression associated with poor differentiation and invasiveness of prostate cancer. Overall, 46 (38%) of 122 evaluable patients showed elevated levels of 12-LOX mRNA in prostate cancer tissues compared with the matching normal tissues. A statistically significantly greater number of cases were found to have an elevated level of 12-LOX among T3, high grade, and surgical margin-positive than T2, intermediate, and low grade, and surgical margin-negative prostatic adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that elevation of 12-LOX mRNA expression occurs more frequently in advanced stage, high-grade prostate cancer and that 12-LOX may serve as an indicator for progression and prognosis of prostate cancer. This enzyme also may be a novel target for the development of anti-invasive and antimetastatic agents.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Expression of prostate-specific antigen is transcriptionally regulated by genistein in prostate cancer cells.

Prostate cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the United States. Unfortunately, there is no effective therapy when prostate cancer becomes metastatic and refractory to conventional treatments. For this reason, the identification and exploration of new agents that reduce prostate cancer cell growth are of paramount importance. High consumption of plant-derived phytoestrogens is inversely associated with the incidence and mortality rate of prostate cancer. Previous studies, including our own, have shown that the phytoestrogen genistein inhibits prostate cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo and decreases secreted and intracellular levels of the androgen-regulated protein prostate-specific antigen (PSA), but the role of genistein as an agonist/antagonist for hormone receptors remains unclear. To elucidate the mechanism by which genistein modulates PSA protein expression in prostate cancer cells, we investigated the effects of genistein on androgen-mediated and estrogen-mediated transcriptional regulation of PSA, androgen receptor (AR) mRNA and protein expression, and the ability of nuclear proteins to bind to androgen-response elements (AREs) in LNCaP cells. We showed that genistein decreased the transcriptional activation of PSA by both androgen-dependent and androgen-independent methods in LNCaP cells. The reduction of androgen-mediated transcriptional activation of PSA was correlated with decreased AR protein and mRNA levels and decreased binding to AREs. In contrast, genistein had differential effects on 17beta-estradiol-mediated PSA expressions. Low concentrations of genistein enhanced 17beta-estradiol-mediated PSA expressions, whereas high concentrations of genistein inhibited estrogen-mediated PSA expression in LNCaP cells. Genistein did not inhibit AR protein expression in the presence of 17beta-estradiol. These results suggest that ligand-dependent differences in the ability to activate PSA expression may contribute to the agonistic/antagonistic responses observed with genistein in prostate cancer cells.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2005

[Markers for diagnosis, prediction and prognosis of prostate cancer].

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most frequent new cancer diagnosis in the western world today. There is an urgent need to obtain validated molecular markers that can identify clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The article represents our view of the current status of molecular markers in diagnosis of prostate cancer based on literature searches (PubMed). RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a sensitive serum marker for pathology in the prostate (cancer, infection, benign hyperplasia). The level of PSA, however, is poorly correlated with grade and stage of prostate cancer. Genomic and proteomic methodology has recently been used to discover more then 200 putative new markers for prostate cancer like alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (AMACR), hepsin, glutathione S-transferase pi, EZH2 and DD3(PCA3). To date, none of these markers have been adequately validated for clinical use. Knowledge about the role of these candidates in prostate cancer biology and evaluation of their correlation to clinical parameters will be of importance in the validation process.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed1995

Failure of focal prostate cancer on biopsy to predict focal prostate cancer: the importance of prevalence.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether the reported correlation between focal prostate cancer on biopsy and the presence of clinically insignificant cancer applies to men with an elevated serum prostate specific antigen level or a positive biopsy from an area of palpable abnormality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 33 men with these findings and focal cancer on biopsy underwent radical perineal prostatectomy, with step-section pathological analysis of all specimens and volume determination of all stage pT2a tumors. RESULTS: Pathological examination revealed that 17 tumors (52%) were stage T3, 10 (30%) stage T2b to c and 6 (18%) stage T2a, with 4 (12%) significant (volumes 0.8 to 1.2 ml.) and 2 (6%) insignificant (volumes 0.1 and 0.3 ml.) neoplasms. Thus, focal prostate cancer on biopsy correlated with significant cancer in 94% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with another variable controlling for a high prevalence of significant prostate cancer, the focal nature of a positive biopsy probably reflects only sampling limitations and should not influence treatment. To restrict prostate biopsy to men with a high prevalence of significant cancer, targeted area biopsy alone must replace sextant biopsy in men with a palpable prostatic abnormality but a normal prostate specific antigen level.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Sexual function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: multivariate quality-of-life analysis from CaPSURE. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the effect of treatment choice (pelvic irradiation [XRT] versus radical prostatectomy [RP] with or without nerve sparing) on sexual function and sexual bother during the first 2 years after treatment. METHODS: We studied sexual function and sexual bother in 438 men recently diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer and treated with XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing. Outcomes were assessed with the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, a validated health-related quality-of-life instrument that includes these two domains. To minimize the influence of other factors, we adjusted for age, comorbidity, general health, and previous treatment for erectile dysfunction. All subjects were drawn from CaPSURE, a national, longitudinal data base. RESULTS: Sexual function improved over time during the first year in all treatment groups; however, during the second year, sexual function began to decline in the XRT group. Older patients who received XRT showed substantial declines in sexual function throughout the 2 years, and older patients who underwent RP experienced a return of very low baseline sexual function. Sexual function was improved by the use of nerve-sparing procedures or erectile aids. Alterations in sexual bother were ameliorated by many factors, including age, general health perceptions, and sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing all showed comparable rates of improvement in sexual function during the first year after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. However, in the second year after treatment, patients treated with XRT began to show declining sexual function; patients treated with RP did not.

Aged↗