SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Translating”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 757 records · Page 42Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

The 5'-untranslated region of GLUT1 glucose transporter mRNA causes differential regulation of the translational rate in plant and animal systems.

The blood-brain barrier GLUT1 glucose transporter is under post-transcriptional regulation, and the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of the GLUT1 mRNA increases its translational rate in mammalian cells. To obtain more insight into the mechanism of translational control of GLUT1, the present investigation studied the translational efficiency of capped full-length synthetic human (h) and rabbit (rab) GLUT1 mRNA and both 5'- and 3'-UTR deleted hGLUT1 mRNAs in both mammalian and plant cell free translation systems. Translation efficiency of both h- and rabGLUT1 mRNA was increased 3- to 6-fold in rabbit retyculocyte lysate (RRL) compared with wheat germ extract (WGE). Confirming previous observations, deletion of 5'- and 5'/-3'-UTR markedly reduced the translation efficiency of the h-GLUT1 transcript in RRL. On the contrary, these deletions markedly increased the translation of GLUT1 in WGE. The present data provide additional evidence suggesting that the 5'-UTR of the GLUT1 mRNA contains cis-acting elements involved in the translational activation of the GLUT1 gene in mammalian cells and that factors involved in this cis/trans-acting interaction are either absent or down-regulated in plant systems.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

The translational research chain: is it delivering the goods?

PURPOSE: To address whether the translational research chain has influenced clinical practice in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Merits and limitations of the various steps of the translational chain, i.e., in vitro studies, animal experiments, biomathematical modeling, Phase I and II trials, and randomized Phase III trials are briefly reviewed. The process and value of translational research in radiation oncology are addressed using dose fractionation and the time factor in tumors as examples. RESULTS: The examples show that translational research may indeed change clinical practice in radiation oncology. However, it takes several decades and considerable efforts to define and test new strategies. The "translational process" is by no means unidirectional but a continuing multiway dialog among basic scientists, applied scientists, clinical scientists, and clinical oncologists. CONCLUSION: Translational research works in radiation oncology, and it is difficult to conceive a better alternative for future improvement of therapy. The slow speed of the translational process indicates that there is a need for improving the various steps of the translational network and the interaction as a whole. Massive investments in one part of the network are likely to be at least partly wasted unless the other links are strengthened as well.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Translational control of growth factor and proto-oncogene expression.

Control of translation is now understood to be one of the major regulatory events in eukaryotic gene expression. Moreover there is evidence which suggests that aberrant expression of growth-related genes by translational mechanisms makes a significant contribution to cell transformation. However, the mechanisms which regulate translation of specific growth-related mRNAs have yet to be fully elucidated. The majority of these mRNAs have long 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) and three features which are important in translational control have been identified, namely (i) structured regions which inhibit the scanning mechanisms of translation, (ii) regulatory upstream open reading frames and (iii) internal ribosome entry segments which are capable of initiating cap-independent translation. In this review the translational regulation of specific mRNAs encoding growth factors and proto-oncogenes by these three mechanisms will be discussed, together with examples of altered translational regulation in neoplasia.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

PubMed1999

Translational regulation of ornithine decarboxylase and other enzymes of the polyamine pathway.

It has long been known that polyamines play an essential role in the proliferation of mammalian cells, and the polyamine biosynthetic pathway may provide an important target for the development of agents that inhibit carcinogenesis and tumor growth. The rate-limiting enzymes of the polyamine pathway, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC), are highly regulated in the cell, and much of this regulation occurs at the level of translation. Although the 5' leader sequences of ODC and AdoMetDC are both highly structured and contain small internal open reading frames (ORFs), the regulation of their translation appears to be quite different. The translational regulation of ODC is more dependent on secondary structure, and therefore responds to the intracellular availability of active eIF-4E, the cap-binding subunit of the eIF-4F complex, which mediates translation initiations. Cell-specific translation of AdoMetDC appears to be regulated exclusively through the internal ORF, which causes ribosome stalling that is independent of eIF-4E levels and decreases the efficiency with which the downstream ORF encoding AdoMetDC protein is translated. The translation of both ODC and AdoMetDC is negatively regulated by intracellular changes in the polyamines spermidine and spermine. Thus, when polyamine levels are low, the synthesis of both ODC and AdoMetDC is increased, and an increase in polyamine content causes a corresponding decrease in protein synthesis. However, an increase in active eIF-4E may allow for the synthesis of ODC even in the presence of polyamine levels that repress ODC translation in cells with lower levels of the initiation factor. In contrast, the amino acid sequence that is encoded by the upstream ORF is critical for polyamine regulation of AdoMetDC synthesis and polyamines may affect synthesis by interaction with the putative peptide, MAGDIS.

Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase↗

PubMed2000

Ribosomal RNA supplementation highly reinforced cell-free translation activity of wheat germ.

We have constructed an inexpensive, highly efficient eukaryotic cell-free translation system. Wheat germ rRNA (WG rRNA) was prepared by phenol/chloroform (P/C) extraction, a simple and quick method, from wheat germ, an inexpensive and commercially available by-product of flour production. Addition of a small amount of WG rRNA into a wheat germ cell-free translation system increased the protein productivity of the system 6- to 8-fold. Isolated 18S or 28S rRNA alone enhanced the protein production only 2-fold or 3.9-fold, respectively, at maximum. On the other hand, their equimolar mixture enhanced the production as much as the whole WG rRNA, indicating 18S and 28S rRNA synergistically functioned to enhance protein synthesis. Addition of WG rRNA slightly improved the stability of mRNA in the cell-free translation system, which explained only partly the enhancement of protein production. Addition of WGE or ribosome containing approximately the same amount of rRNA in the form of protein-rRNA complex as WG rRNA added to the system did not increase the protein production in the translation system. When ribosome in the cell-free translation system was replaced with WG rRNA, the system did not exhibit any detectable translation activity, indicating that the translation activity of WG rRNA is negligible in comparison with that of ribosome. These results indicated that WG rRNA affected some mechanisms regulating the translation rate in wheat germ cell-free system, resulting in increased protein production.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Measurements of lumbopelvic lordosis using the pelvic radius technique as it correlates with sagittal spinal balance and sacral translation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Maintenance of normal lumbar lordosis is important in the treatment of spinal disorders. Many attempts have been made to quantify normal sagittal spinal alignment and lordosis using a C7 plumb line and segmental angulations of the spinal vertebrae. Little attention has been given to pelvic compensation as it correlates to lumbar lordosis and overall sagittal spinal alignment. Better methods of measuring lordosis, which correlate with sagittal spinal balance and pelvic compensation, are needed in treating patients with spinal disorders. PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between lumbopelvic lordosis, pelvic rotation and sagittal spinal balance and standardize a method for measuring lumbopelvic lordosis, sacral translation, and sagittal spinal alignment. STUDY DESIGN: Sagittal alignments using the C7 plumb line, Cobb angles, sacral plumb line and the pelvic radius (PR) technique were used to measure standing 36-inch lateral radiographs of patients with various spinal disorders. PATIENT SAMPLE: A review of the records identified 62 patients with various spinal pathologies presenting to the (RGW) spine clinic that had standing lateral spine radiographs. Only radiographs that allowed positive identification of the C7 vertebral body, the entire thoracolumbar spine, the sacrum and both femoral heads were studied. These criteria allowed inclusion of 28 subjects in this study. The final population had 12 women and 16 men with an average age of 52 years (SD, 16.6 years; range, 20 to 84 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: No outcomes measures were used in this study. METHODS: Measurements for sagittal spinal balance and lumbopelvic lordosis were made on 36-inch standing lateral radiographs of adult patients. Measurements included the C7 plumb line, segmental angulations of spinal vertebrae (Cobb angles), sacral translation and the PR technique for lumbopelvic lordosis. Data were analyzed for significant correlation between lumbopelvic lordosis, sagittal spinal balance, sacral translation and total segmental lumbar lordosis using the Cobb method. RESULTS: Our population averaged 50 degrees of total segmental lumbar lordosis from L1 to S1 (SD, 14.3; maximum, 89.5; minimum, 17.9). Nearly 75% of total segmental lumbar lordosis measured from L1 to S1 can be accounted for through the L4 to S1 superior end plates and 47% through L5 to S1 superior end plates in our population. Total segmental lumbar lordosis correlated with total thoracic kyphosis (r=0.45, p=.008). Total segmental lumbar lordosis measured by the Cobb method significantly correlated with sagittal spinal balance (r=-0.35, p=.022) and sacral translation (r=0.41, p=.016). Measurements for lumbopelvic lordosis significantly correlated with sagittal spinal balance (r=-0.33, p=.042), sacral translation (r=-0.70, p=.00002) and total segmental lumbar lordosis (r=0.82, p<.000001). Measurements for sacral translation and sagittal spinal balance also correlated significantly (r=0.35, p=.034). CONCLUSIONS: Sacral translation, the C7 plumb line and lumbopelvic lordosis are useful measures for sagittal spinal balance. Lumbopelvic lordosis and sacral translation can be correlated to the sagittal spinal balance. Understanding these measurements and the range of lumbopelvic compensation can be extremely helpful in treating patients with spinal pathology and in avoidance of flatback deformity. Application of these measures would be especially helpful in the treatment of patients with spinal fusion, degenerative spondylosis, disc disease, fractures, and in the prevention of sagittal malalignment.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Translation: in retrospect and prospect.

This review is occasioned by the fact that the problem of translation, which has simmered on the biological sidelines for the last 40 years, is about to erupt center stage--thanks to the recent spectacular advances in ribosome structure. This most complex, beautiful, and fascinating of cellular mechanisms, the translation apparatus, is also the most important. Translation not only defines gene expression, but it is the sine qua non without which modern (protein-based) cells would not have come into existence. Yet from the start, the problem of translation has been misunderstood--a reflection of the molecular perspective that dominated Biology of the last century. In that the our conception of translation will play a significant role in creating the structure that is 21st century Biology, it is critical that our current (and fundamentally flawed) view of translation be understood for what it is and be reformulated to become an all-embracing perspective about which 21st century Biology can develop. Therefore, the present review is both a retrospective and a plea to biologists to establish a new evolutionary, RNA-World-centered concept of translation. What is needed is an evolutionarily oriented perspective that, first and foremost, focuses on the nature (and origin) of a primitive translation apparatus, the apparatus that transformed an ancient evolutionary era of nucleic acid life, the RNA World, into the world of modern cells.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Purification of two picornaviral 2A proteinases: interaction with eIF-4 gamma and influence on in vitro translation.

A mammalian cell infected with a human rhinovirus or enterovirus has a much reduced capability to translate capped mRNAs (the host cell shutoff), while still allowing translation of uncapped viral RNA. Biochemical and genetic evidence suggests that the viral proteinase 2A induces cleavage of the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4 gamma (also known as p220) component of eIF-4 (formerly called eIF-4F). However, neither the mechanism underlying the specific proteolysis of eIF-4 gamma nor the influence of this cleavage on the translation of capped mRNAs has been clarified. Such studies have been hampered by a lack of large quantities of a purified 2A proteinase. Therefore, the mature proteinases 2A of human rhinovirus 2 and coxsackievirus B4 were expressed in soluble form in Escherichia coli. A four-step purification protocol was developed; 1 mg of highly purified 2A proteinase per gram wet weight of E. coli was obtained. Both enzymes cleaved directly eIF-4 gamma as part of the purified eIF-4 complex. Addition of HRV2 2A proteinase to HeLa cell cytoplasmic translation extracts resulted in eIF-4 gamma cleavage and drastically reduced the translation of capped mRNA; addition of purified eIF-4 restored translation to the initial level. However, translation of a reporter gene driven by the 5'-untranslated region of human rhinovirus 2 was translated 2-3-fold more efficiently in the presence of HRV2 2A proteinase.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1990

Evidence for allosteric coupling between the ribosome and repressor binding sites of a translationally regulated mRNA.

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4 is a translational repressor regulating the expression of four ribosomal genes in the alpha operon. In vitro studies have shown that the protein specifically recognizes an unusual mRNA pseudoknot secondary structure which links sequences upstream and downstream of the ribosome binding site for rpsM (S13) [Tang, C. K., & Draper, D. E. (1989) Cell 57, 531]. We have prepared fusions of the rpsM translational initiation site and lacZ that allows us to detect repression in cells in which overproduction of S4 repressor can be induced. Twenty-five mRNA sequence variants have been introduced into the S13-lacZ fusions and the levels of translational repression measured. Sets of compensating base changes confirm the importance of the pseudoknot secondary structure for translational repression. An A residue in a looped, single-stranded sequence is also required for S4 recognition and may contact S4 directly. Comparison of translational repression levels and S4 binding constants for the set of mRNA mutations show that nine mutants are repressed much more weakly than predicted from their affinity for S4; in extreme cases no repression can be detected for variants with unchanged S4 binding. We suggest that the mRNA contains functionally distinct ribosome and repressor binding sites that are allosterically coupled. Mutations can relieve translational repression by disrupting the linkage between the two sites without altering S4 binding. This proposal assigns to the mRNA a more active role in mediating translational repression than found in other translational repression systems.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2004

Translational control of apolipoprotein B mRNA: regulation via cis elements in the 5' and 3' untranslated regions.

Translational control of apolipoprotein B (apoB) mRNA has been previously documented; however, the molecular mechanisms that govern translation of apoB mRNA are unknown. We investigated the role of the untranslated regions (UTR) in the regulation of apoB mRNA translation first by analyzing apoB UTR sequences using M-fold, a program used to predict RNA secondary structure. M-fold analysis revealed hairpin-like elements within the 5'UTR and 3'UTR of apoB mRNA with potential to form stable secondary structure. Luciferase (LUC) reporter assays were conducted to assess the biological activity of the putative RNA motifs within the UTR sequences by transiently transfecting HepG2 cells with chimeric mRNAs containing the 5' and/or 3' apoB UTRs linked to a LUC reporter gene. We observed statistically significant increases in LUC activity for the 5'UTRpGL3 and 5'/3'UTRpGL3 constructs. LUC mRNA levels remained constant for all constructs, suggesting that increased LUC activity was likely posttranscriptional in nature. When RNA isolated from transfected cells was translated in vitro, parallel increases in translatable LUC activity were observed. We also examined the role of UTR sequences within the context of the apoB coding sequence, using constructs containing the N-terminal 15% of apoB (apoB15). We observed a 40% and 25% increase in total protein mass with the 5'UTR-apoB15 construct and the 5'UTR-apoB15-3'UTR, respectively, over the control construct with no apoB UTR, with only a slight stimulation observed for apoB15 3'UTR. Radiolabeling analysis of apoB15 synthetic rate showed a more striking 4.5-fold stimulation of protein synthesis by 5'UTR while addition of both UTRs caused a 3.1-fold stimulation over the control construct. Deletion mutant analysis revealed that the stimulatory effect of the 5'UTR on apoB mRNA translation may be dependent on specific hairpin elements formed within the 5'UTR secondary structure. Overall, our data suggest that putative 5'UTR motifs are important for optimal translation of the apoB message whereas the presence of the 3'UTR appears to attenuate wild-type expression. Potential cis-trans interactions of these motifs with putative RNA binding proteins/translational factors are likely to govern apoB mRNA translation and protein synthesis and may play an important role in dysregulation of atherogenic lipoprotein production in dyslipidemic states.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

PubMed1996

A single amino acid change in protein synthesis initiation factor 4G renders cap-dependent translation resistant to picornaviral 2A proteases.

Infection of cells with picornaviruses of the rhino-, aphtho-, and enterovirus groups causes a shut-off in cap-dependent translation of cellular mRNAs but permits cap-independent viral RNA translation to proceed. This shut-off is thought to be mediated in part by the proteolytic cleavage of eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), although there is evidence to the contrary. Cleavage of eIF4G results in the separation of the eIF4E-binding domain from the ribosome- and helicase-binding domains of the factor, thereby limiting the ability of eIF4G to function in cap-dependent recruitment of mRNAs. Previously we determined the cleavage site within eIF4G targeted by the 2A proteases from human coxsackievirus serotype B4 and human rhinovirus serotype 2 using highly purified eIF4F and recombinant proteases. To examine further the role proteolysis of eIF4G plays in shut-off of translation, we altered the 2A cleavage site in human eIF4G by site-directed mutagenesis. Strikingly, the replacement of one amino acid at the 2A cleavage site resulted in a protein that is approximately 100-fold resistant to cleavage by coxsackievirus 2A protease and 10-50-fold for rhinovirus 2A. Alteration of the cleavage site had no effect on factor activity since the variant was just as active as wild-type eIF4G in restoring cap-dependent translation to an in vitro translation system depleted of endogenous eIF4G. Furthermore, the presence of the variant form of eIF4G rendered in vitro translation reactions resistant to the 2A protease-mediated inhibition of cap-dependent translation initiation. These results support the model that 2A proteases inhibit cap-dependent translation through direct proteolysis of eIF4G.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Cleavage of p220 by purified poliovirus 2A(pro) in cell-free systems: effects on translation of capped and uncapped mRNAs.

Poliovirus protease 2A(pro) has been obtained in soluble form as a fusion protein with maltose binding protein (MBP). Addition of MBP-2A(pro) to rabbit reticulocyte cell-free systems gives rise to efficient cleavage of the initiation factor of translation p220 (eIF-4G). Translation of capped mRNA encoding the influenza virus NP protein is severely impaired in lysates in which p220 has been proteolytically cleaved. This inhibition is dependent on the concentration of mRNA added to the lysate. Thus, increasing the concentrations of mRNA substantially overcomes the blockade of NP synthesis after p220 cleavage. Notably, translation of uncapped NP mRNA is also compromised in p220-deficient rabbit reticulocyte lysates, suggesting that p220 participates in the translation of both capped and uncapped NP mRNAs. The effects of p220 proteolysis by poliovirus 2A(pro) have also been assayed on luciferase mRNA translation. Three types of mRNAs encoding for luciferase have been examined: capped, uncapped, and mRNA bearing the poliovirus 5' leader region (leader luc mRNA). Synthesis of luciferase directed by any of these mRNAs was inhibited after cleavage of p220 in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Interestingly, supplementation of the lysate with HeLa cell extracts stimulates leader luc mRNA translation by poliovirus 2A(pro). These results indicate that activation of translation of mRNAs bearing the poliovirus leader region promoted by this poliovirus protease requires a factor present in HeLa cell extracts. These findings agree well with recent experiments implicating p220 not only in protein synthesis directed by capped mRNAs but also in the translation of naturally uncapped mRNAs.

Carrier Proteins↗

PubMed2003

RNA-binding protein-mediated translational repression of transgene expression in plants.

We have demonstrated that RNA-binding proteins from coliphages and yeast can function as translational repressors in plants. RNA sequences called translational operators were inserted at a cap-proximal position in the 5'-UTR of mRNAs of two reporter genes, gus or aroA:CP4. Translation of the reporter mRNAs was efficiently repressed when the RNA binding protein that specifically binds to its cognate operator was co-expressed. The efficiency of translational repression by RNA-binding protein positively correlated with the amount of binding protein in transformed plant cells. Detailed studies on coliphage MS2 coat protein-mediated translational repression also suggested that the efficiency of translational repression was position-dependent. A translational operator situated at the cap-proximal position was more efficient in conferring repression than one that was placed cap-distal. Translational repression can be an efficient means for regulation of transgene expression, thereby broadening current approaches for transgene regulation in plants.

3-Phosphoshikimate 1-Carboxyvinyltransferase↗

PubMed2004

Degradation of poly(A)-binding protein in apoptotic cells and linkage to translation regulation.

We have recently shown that poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) is cleaved during poliovirus and Coxsackievirus infection by viral 3Cprotease and that 3Cprotease modification of a subset of PABP can result in significant translation inhibition. During apoptosis, translation undergoes significant down-regulation that correlates with caspase-3 mediated cleavage of several translation factors, including eIF4G, 4EBP1 and eIF2alpha. The fate of PABP in apoptotic cells has not yet been examined. Here we show that PABP levels decline significantly via proteolytic degradation in apoptotic HeLa, Jurkat and MCF7 cells. The degradation of PABP correlated with translation inhibition but lagged behind cleavage of eIF4GI. In apoptotic MCF7 cells translation inhibition occurred without modification of most translation factors and correlated with PABP degradation. PABP was not cleaved during incubation with several caspases, yet caspase 3 induced weak PABP degradative activity in cells lysates. Both the caspase inhibitor zVAD and calpain inhibitors blocked PABP cleavage in vivo, while the proteosome inhibitor MG132 induced PABP degradation. Protease(s) activated during apoptosis preferentially degraded PABP associated with ribosomes and translation factors, but not PABP in other cellular compartments. The data suggest that targeted degradation of PABP contributes to translation inhibition in apoptotic cells.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2004

A co-translational model to explain the in vivo import of proteins into HeLa cell mitochondria.

The dual signal approach, i.e. a mitochondrial signal at the N-terminus and an ER (endoplasmic reticulum) or a peroxisomal signal at the C-terminus of EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein), was employed in transfected HeLa cells to test for a co-translational import model. The signal peptide from OTC (ornithine transcarbamylase) or arginase II was fused to the N-terminus of EGFP, and an ER or peroxisomal signal was fused to its C-terminus. The rationale was that if the free preprotein remained in the cytosol, it could be distributed between the two organelles by using a post-translational pathway. The resulting fusion proteins were imported exclusively into mitochondria, suggesting that co-translational import occurred. Native preALDH (precursor of rat liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase), preOTC and rhodanese, each with the addition of a C-terminal ER or peroxisomal signal, were also translocated only to the mitochondria, again showing that a co-translational import pathway exists for these native proteins. Import of preALDH(sp)-DHFR, a fusion protein consisting of the leader sequence (signal peptide) of preALDH fused to DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase), was studied in the presence of methotrexate, a substrate analogue for DHFR. It was found that 70% of the preALDH(sp)-DHFR was imported into mitochondria in the presence of methotrexate, implying that 70% of the protein utilized the co-translational import pathway and 30% used the post-translational import pathway. Thus it appears that co-translational import is a major pathway for mitochondrial protein import. A model is proposed to explain how competition between binding factors could influence whether or not a cytosolic carrier protein, such as DHFR, uses the co- or post-translational import pathway.

Aldehyde Dehydrogenase↗

PubMed2005

Binding and repression of translation of the cognate mRNA by Trichinella spiralis thymidylate synthase differ from the corresponding interactions of the human enzyme.

Thymidylate synthase (TS) of Trichinella spiralis, a parasitic nematode causing trichinellosis, was found to bind its own mRNA and repress translation of the latter, similar to its human counter-part [Chu, Koeller, Casey, Drake, Chabner, Elwood, Zinn and Allegra (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 8977-8981]. However, in striking contrast with human TS, the parasite enzyme's interaction with mRNA was not affected by any of the substrate (deoxyuridylate or N(5,10)-methylenetetrahydrofolate) nor by the inhibitor (fluorodeoxyuridylate; used alone or in the presence of N(5,10)-methylenetetrahydrofolate) similar to that shown for the bifunctional enzyme from Plasmodium falciparum [Zhang and Rathod (2002) Science 296, 545-547]. Moreover, repression of the translation of the parasite enzyme was enhanced by the same ligands that were shown by others (Chu et al., 1991) to prevent human TS from impairing its translation. On comparing the capacity of TS to bind to its cognate mRNA, relative to its ability to inhibit its translation, the same enzyme preparation was active as translational repressor at a considerably lower protein/mRNA ratio, suggesting the two phenomena to be disconnected. Of interest is the fact that the presence of the enzyme protein N-terminal methionine proved to be critical for binding, but not for repression of its translation, indicating that mRNA binding requires a methionine or an adduct (i.e. methionine-histidine) at the N-terminus of TS, but that the translational repression effect does not. Notably, chicken liver dihydrofolate reductase, which is incapable of binding to T. spiralis TS mRNA, repressed the translation of TS.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Co-operation of the 5' and 3' untranslated regions of ornithine decarboxylase mRNA and inhibitory role of its 3' untranslated region in regulating the translational efficiency of hybrid RNA species via cellular factor.

The 5' untranslated region (UTR) has an inhibitory role in the translatability of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) mRNA and of hybrid mRNA species, whereas the ODC 3' UTR causes a partial release of this inhibition. We designed experiments to explore whether the co-operation between ODC 5' UTR and 3' UTR in the translational regulation is due to a direct interaction of those sequences or whether it is mediated by their interaction with cellular factor(s). We stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells and transiently transfected COS-1 cells with expression vectors carrying different chimaeric DNAs having the luciferase (LUC) coding sequence as reporter gene, the ODC 5' UTR or the ODC 3' UTR, or both, in the appropriate positions. We compared the results obtained by assaying the LUC activities of both transfected cell lines with each chimaeric DNA with those observed by translating the hybrid RNAs in a translation system in vitro. When the ODC 3' UTR was present, we observed a partial release of the translation inhibition owing to the ODC 5' UTR only in vivo. The releasing effect was restored in vitro by the addition of cytoplasmic extracts from wild-type CHO-K1 or COS-1 cells, prepared 2 and 8 h after their release from serum starvation. We also observed a partial inhibition of the translatability of the hybrid RNA owing to the presence of the ODC 3' UTR itself; the translational efficiency could be rescued by cell extract from 8 h serum-stimulated cells. The co-operation between the ODC-UTRs might be mediated by factors expressed by cells during particular phases of the cell cycle. Excess copies of the ODC-UTRs, expressed in trans, could compete in binding limited amounts of such regulatory factors and remove them from interaction with the endogenous ODC mRNA. This phenomenon should be reflected by modifications of the kinetics of ODC and/or LUC activities during serum stimulation. The overexpression of the ODC 3' UTR determined an increase in both endogenous ODC activity and LUC activity. Moreover, in the transfectants expressing the hybrid RNA species bearing the ODC 3' UTR the basal ODC activity is higher than that observed in control cells. We suggest that excess copies of the ODC 3' UTR mis-regulate the endogenous ODC translatability, probably by tying up regulatory molecules expressed by cells in limited amounts and sequestering them from the ODC mRNA species they should interact with.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Regulation of mRNA translation.

The control of mRNA translation plays an important role in regulating gene expression in diverse situations. Nutrients, especially amino acids, regulate translation to control the expression of specific proteins including transcriptional activators and ribosomal proteins. Sequence elements in the 5'- or 3'-untranslated regions of mRNAs can control their translation. Hormones such as insulin activate protein synthesis by switching on translation factors required for overall mRNA translation. Viruses employ a range of stratagems to ensure efficient translation of their mRNAs and in some cases to inhibit host cell translation. During development, control of mRNA translation regulates gene expression both spatially and temporally.

Animals↗