Vasoconstrictors in spinal anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A 37-year-old primipara was scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in the 38th gestational week because of cephalo-pelvic disproportion. She had suffered from chronic renal failure since 27 years of age, and had been undergoing hemodialysis three times per week. The frequency of hemodialysis was increased to 4-6 times per week during pregnancy to maintain blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine concentration below 60 mg.dl-1 and 6.0 mg.dl-1, respectively. Since she had no bleeding tendency, spinal anesthesia with 8 mg of tetracaine was successfully performed after hemodialysis eliminating only solute but not water in the morning of surgery and after infusion of 500 ml of acetated Ringer solution. Blood pressure and heart rate were stable during surgery. Monitoring of central venous pressure was useful for fluid management. A baby weighing 2,575 g with an Apgar Score of 8 at one minute and 9 at five minutes was delivered five minutes after the beginning the surgery. The mother recovered uneventfully and returned to regular hemodialysis on the first postoperative day. These findings suggest that with careful fluid management, spinal anesthesia can be safely performed for cesarean section, for patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Wide variability exists in the number of anesthetic procedures to which anesthesia residents are exposed during their training. The number of attempts at various procedures before a trainee becomes proficient at performing each anesthetic procedure is not known. To determine the learning process of 150 attempts of spinal anesthesia and 100 attempts of orotracheal intubation, the two most frequent anesthetic procedures, we evaluated 9 first-year anesthesia residents according to their rate of success or failure. The learning curves of both procedures revealed an initial rapid improvement of success during the first 20 attempts. Spinal anesthesia was more difficult to learn (p=0.0002) but the learning curves of spinal anesthesia and orotracheal intubation reached a nondifferent high success rate of 82 per cent and 88.9 per cent respectively (p=0.13). According to this study the institutional recommended number of cases for spinal anesthesia and orotracheal intubation were 112 and 27 cases respectively.
UNLABELLED: In this clinical trial we evaluated the clinical effects of levobupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in children. An open, noncomparative study was performed on 40 children, aged 1-14 yr, undergoing elective lower abdominal or lower limb surgery. A plain solution of S(-)-bupivacaine 5 mg/mL at a mean dose of 0.3 mg/kg body weight (range, 0.2-0.5 mg/kg body weight) was administered via the L3-4 or L4-5 interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. After injection, the patients were placed supine. The spread and duration of sensory analgesia and the degree of motor block were recorded. Satisfactory surgical anesthesia was achieved in 39 of the 40 children. One child received supplemental anesthesia. The mean highest level of sensory block was T4 (range, T2 to L1), and the mean time to the regression of sensory block to T10 was 90 min (range, 43-185 min). A complete motor block was achieved in 36 children. These results are similar to those obtained with racemic bupivacaine in subarachnoid anesthesia in children. IMPLICATIONS: This noncomparative, descriptive study showed that levobupivacaine, the S(-)-enantiomer of bupivacaine, has equivalent clinical efficacy in spinal anesthesia in children to that of racemic bupivacaine.
In order to investigate the function of the auditory pathway from the cochlea to the brain stem under total spinal anesthesia, the auditory brain stem response (ABR), compound action potential of the cochlear nerve (CAP), and cochlear microphonics (CM) were simultaneously recorded in rats. Total spinal anesthesia was induced by infusion of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride at a constant rate of 0.10 mL/min into the cerebrospinal fluid through the rats' skulls. The ABR completely disappeared within 1.5 to 4 minutes. After cessation of the injection, the ABR reappeared, starting from wave I and progressing through waves II and III to wave IV. The latency change of the CAP throughout the recording period was quite similar to that of wave I of the ABR. A reduction in amplitude of the CM was observed, but the CM did not disappear during the recording period. Disappearance of the ABR was due, not to loss of cochlear function, but to anesthetic effects on the acoustic nerve and the brain stem. Monitoring of the ABR provided information on the level of neural activity in the brain stem under total spinal anesthesia.
BACKGROUND: Intracranial subdural hematoma is an exceptionally rare complication of spinal anesthesia. We report a case of this infrequent event and consider the influence of cerebral atrophy as a predisposing factor. METHODS AND RESULTS: This 18-year-old woman with severe headaches was admitted to the hospital 42 days after delivery. She had a history of normal pregnancy and uneventful labor and delivery. The epidural anesthesia was satisfactory. Computed tomography showed bilateral chronic subdural hematomas that were surgically removed. An early follow-up scan showed marked resolution of the hematomas and a small sized brain with large subarachnoid space. A late follow-up scan confirmed the diagnosis of brain atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Persistence of headache and gradual progression despite treatment must be regarded as a sign of intracranial complication following spinal anesthesia. In this case, cerebral atrophy is considered to be a contributory factor for the development of subdural hematoma following dural puncture.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of an intravenous (IV) ephedrine bolus given simultaneously with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: 40 ASA physical status I and II nonlaboring women undergoing elective cesarean delivery of term, uncomplicated, singleton pregnancies. INTERVENTIONS: After a 10 mL/kg IV lactated Ringers bolus given over 15 minutes, patients simultaneously received an IV dose of 2 mL (10 mg) ephedrine or 2 mL saline, and an intrathecal dose of 12 mg (1.6 mL 0.75%) bupivacaine with 10 microg of fentanyl. Hypotension, defined as a 20% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP), was treated with 10-mg IV doses of ephedrine. MEASUREMENTS: Hemodynamic (heart rate and MAP) and non-invasive thoracic impedance (cardiac index, stroke index, and systemic vascular resistance index) measurements at baseline and at 1-minute intervals until the time of delivery. Total fluid, supplemental ephedrine, and Apgar scores were recorded. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA), ANOVA for repeated measures, and Mann-Whitney U-tests where appropriate, with p < 0.05 considered significant. MAIN RESULTS: Significant changes from baseline in MAP, systemic vascular resistance index, heart rate, and cardiac index were observed in both groups after spinal anesthesia. However, there were no differences between the ephedrine and saline groups in the incidence and severity of change from the baseline. The overall incidence of hypotension was 70% in both groups. No difference in total fluid or supplemental ephedrine use was observed. CONCLUSIONS: 10 mg of IV ephedrine given at the time of spinal anesthesia, and after a 10 mL/kg lactated Ringers fluid bolus, does not diminish the incidence or severity of hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.
Hypotension is a common side effect associated with spinal anesthesia. However, there is no previous report comparing the incidence of hypotension between two commonly used local anesthetic agents, bupivacaine and lidocaine. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of spinal hypotension induced by bupivacaine and lidocaine in parturients undergoing cesarean section. A double blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 142 parturients scheduled for cesarean section. The patients were randomized into two groups, 71 each. After receiving 10 ml/kg of normal saline intravenously, patients in the first group were given 2.2 ml of 0.5 per cent hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.2 mg of morphine as a spinal anesthetic agent while in the other group, 1.2 ml of 5 per cent hyperbaric lidocaine plus 0.1 mg of epinephrine and 0.2 mg of morphine were administered. Hypotension, defined as 30 per cent less systolic blood pressure than baseline value, was recorded and the patients were treated with 6 mg of ephedrine every 2 minutes until normotension was achieved. There was no statistically significant difference of incidence, onset, duration, and severity of hypotension between the two groups (p > 0.05). The amount of ephedrine used in both groups was also not significantly different. Late onset hypotension occurred after delivery (20-22 minutes after spinal anesthesia was performed) in 17 patients (12%). As such, the rate of hypotension in lidocaine group was comparable to bupivacaine group. Delayed onset hypotension occurring after delivery was noted and these events have never been described. However, the mechanism of late onset hypotension remains unidentified. Thus, bupivacaine and lidocaine can be used interchangeably for spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section without significant difference in the incidence of hypotension.
PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of ephedrine compared with control when given prophylactically to prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. SOURCE: Randomized, controlled trials obtained through MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, contact with leading experts, and a reference list of published articles were analyzed. The following keywords were utilized: spinal anesthesia, hypotension, Cesarean section, pregnancy complications, pregnancy outcome, fetal outcome, neonatal outcome, umbilical blood cord gases, vasopressor and ephedrine. Clinical trials were considered if they compared prophylactic ephedrine, given by any dose or route, vs control. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The 14 clinical trials identified included data from a total of 641 patients. Ephedrine was more effective than control for preventing hypotension (relative risk [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.86). Most importantly, there was no difference in the risk of fetal acidosis, defined as umbilical arterial pH < 7.2 (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.55 to 3.35) or the incidence of low Apgar scores (< 7 or < 8) at one minute (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.29 to 2.06) and five minutes (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.24 to 2.19). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic ephedrine is more effective than control for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery but a clinically relevant positive effect on neonatal outcome was not observed. Therefore, the routine use of prophylactic ephedrine to prevent any adverse effects of maternal hypotension following spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery is not supported by the current systematic review.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if spinal anesthesia is more difficult to perform in the elderly. METHODS: All spinal anesthetics administered over 18 months by 18 anesthesiologists were eligible. We excluded anesthetics for hip fractures and cesarean deliveries. We recorded time to completion, number of spinal needles used, and number of approaches. The patients were prospectively divided into three age categories: patients <50 years of age (group 1); 50-70 years of age (group 2); and >70 years of age (group 3). Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were performed. RESULTS: Nine hundred and ninety-nine anesthetics were analyzed. There were 368, 336, and 295 entries in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Although the mean +/- SD (in min) times to accomplish the spinal technique were not significantly different (4.3 +/- 4.1, 4.4 +/- 3.2, and 4.6 +/- 3.4 for groups 1, 2, and 3), there was a statistically greater frequency of more than one spinal needle used and more than one approach needed in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patient age is a minor independent predictor of increased technical difficulty with spinal anesthesia.
A 32-year-old woman with spina bifida occulta was scheduled for hemorroidectomy under spinal anesthesia. Preoperatively, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. The MRI demonstrated the conus medul laris reaching the L 3 level and a lipoma connected with conus medullaris intrathecally. Spinal anesthesia was done successfully at the L 3-4 interspace using 0.3% dibucaine 1.2 ml with 5% glucose 0.8 ml. Postoperatively she showed no neurologic complications. With exact anatomical findings of MRI, spinal anesthesia can be safely performed for patients with spina bifida occulta.
Twenty patients were prospectively and randomly studied to investigate effects of infusion methods of propofol on quality of sedation and ease of sedation control during gynecological laparotomy under spinal anesthesia. After establishment of spinal anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to one of the following two groups, i.e. conventional continuous infusion group (Cont group) and target-controlled infusion group (TCI group). In the Cont group, propofol was started at a rate of 6 mg.kg-1.hr-1 until response to command disappeared. In the TCI group, the initial target concentration of propofol was set at 1.2 micrograms.ml-1 until response to command disappeared. Thereafter infusion rate or target concentration was adjusted to maintain Mackenzie's score at 3 or 4. Predicted concentration of propofol was 1.2 +/- 0.01 micrograms.ml-1 at induction of sedation and 1.2 +/- 0.11 micrograms.ml-1 during stable sedation in the TCI group. Satisfaction VAS, anxiety VAS, discomfort VAS, sedation score and times of changing infusion condition were similar in both groups. Total dose of propofol was significantly less in the TCI group. In conclusion, quality of sedation and ease of control of sedation were comparable in both groups and continuous infusion method is simple.
Ninety patients who were Jehovah's Witnesses underwent 107 total hip replacements without transfusion; all procedures were performed under spinal anesthesia. Of these 90, 87 had not previously undergone hip replacement surgery. They sustained an average intraoperative blood loss of 300 mL, which was a significant reduction compared with that in controlled groups of patients reported by other authors. Factors other than spinal anesthesia that aided in reducing blood loss were posterior surgical exposure of the hip without capsulectomy or removal of the greater trochanter, hemostasis without electrocauterization, and rapidly performed surgery. There were three operative complications and one death, none of which were related to spinal anesthesia.
We assessed the risks and benefits of the administration of fentanyl during spinal anesthesia in the elderly. Forty patients (70-83 yr) undergoing knee or hip replacement were studied. Preoperatively, cognitive function (minimental state examination [MMSE]), associated pathology, medications, and treatment were evaluated. Patients had spinal anesthesia with 12.5 mg bupivacaine plus saline (SS; n = 21) or 25 micrograms fentanyl (FN; n = 19). The number of ailments and drugs per patient were 2.5 and 2.3, respectively; 35%-44% of disorders were untreated, 16%-26% were symptomatic, and 33% were adequately treated. Groups were comparable regarding demographic data and characteristics of the spinal block. Group FN had more pruritus (P < 0.02) and lower SaO2 (P < 0.007), but prevalence of side effects was similar. Pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS], facial expression test [FET] at the time of analgesia request (TAR) was lower in Group FN (P < 0.01). A poor correlation between VAS and FET (range 0.42-0.58) was obtained. MMSE at hospital discharge was no different from preoperative values. Our results show that 25 micrograms of spinal fentanyl do not modify spinal anesthesia in the elderly, but induces pruritus and O2 desaturation. The decrease in postoperative pain intensity and the preservation of cognitive function would justify the use of spinal fentanyl in the elderly.