British guidelines set out standards for genetic tests.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Limited information is available on the frequency of the many CYP2D6 alleles found in African-Americans. DNA was isolated and genetic testing was performed on samples from 222 African-Americans, healthy controls (n=131), and psychiatric patients (n=91). Each DNA was tested for CYP2D6 alleles *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, *9, *10, *11, *14, *15, *17, *18, *19, *20, *25, *26, *29, *30, *31, *35, *36, *37, *40, *41 and *43 and 8 multiple copy alleles (*1xn, *2xn, *4xn, *41xn, *2Lxn, *17xn, *35xn and *10xn) using the AmpliChip CYP450 prototype microarray assay, along with allele-specific-PCR and PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism methods. No significant difference was noted between controls and psychiatric patients in any CYP2D6 allele frequencies. Three subjects were genotyped as poor metabolizers (1.4%; 0.0-2.9%, 95% confidence intervals (CI)), and 10 were classified as ultrarapid metabolizers (4.5%; 1.8-7.2%, 95% CI). A new CYP2D6 allele (*58) and two new duplicated CYP2D6 alleles (*17xn and *2Lxn) not previously reported were also identified. The frequency of the CYP2D6 overexpression in African-Americans may represent a greater therapeutic challenge than its deficiency based on these results. The most common alleles found in African-Americans including CYP2D6*1, *17 and *41 need to be investigated more closely for race-specific allelic variations and the mechanism responsible for differences in allele function more closely examined. The diversity of CYP2D6 alleles suggests that nucleotide arrays or similar methods are needed to efficiently test for the most prominent/relevant CYP2D6 alleles in humans.
In this pilot study, the acceptability of approaching 111 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients with the offer of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) was assessed. A total of 78% of participants found it highly acceptable to have the information about HNPCC brought to their attention at that time.
This study examined the relationship between diagnosis, experience with insurance underwriting, and perceptions of difficulties with insurance in genetically tested families. Discrimination was strictly defined as the misuse of genetic information in underwriting. Forty-eight families received a survey and thirty-nine (81%) responded. No insurance cancellations were reported although many families believed that it happened often. The fear evidenced by the respondents was out of proportion to the experiences and 66% of the families reported moderate to moderate to extreme worry over losing health insurance. Genetic counselors and others involved in caretaking of diagnosed families must expand their roles to assist in providing access to local resources and information concerning insurance issues and other social issues. Addressing medical issues alone will not provide the assistance these families require.
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is widely considered to be a syndrome of defective mismatch repair (MMR). A major concern with genetic diagnosis of HNPCC is the variable, often low, percentage of pathogenic germline mutations that can be detected in MMR genes using common screening methods. The variable percentage of mutation detected is in part related to the sensitivity of conventional screening methods and may also depend on the heterogeneous genetics of HNPCC. Thus, identification of phenotypic criteria predictive of germline mutations in MMR genes may be helpful in efficient HNPCC genetic testing. Clinical diagnostic criteria, initially developed for HNPCC (e.g., Amsterdam I and II, or Bethesda criteria), can be used to clinically select patient candidates that carry germline mutations in MMR genes. More useful criteria were previously developed by analyzing families with germline MMR mutations. Using a complementary approach based on tumor microsatellite instability analysis, we confirm that the Amsterdam criteria are significantly better than the Bethesda criteria in predicting families with MSI-H tumors (P = 0.0227). Our results also suggest that a cutoff at < 50 years' mean age at diagnosis of HNPCC-related cancers (especially colorectal and endometrial cancer) may be an additional tool for the identification of families with defective MMR. Recent advances in MMR mutation screening are expected to improve detection of pathogenic MMR mutations in these families. Conversely, the high proportion of MSS tumors observed in our series of families with advanced age at cancer diagnosis is consistent with the low percentage of MMR mutations detected by previous studies in families with this phenotype. These families probably carry mutations in other genes that may or may not be related to MMR. Additional studies are necessary to clarify the molecular basis for HNPCC in families with MSS tumors.
Nursing has been challenged to lead in all areas of knowledge development in genetics. In addition to participation in genetic counseling and research, the profession must be an advocate for the proper use of new clinical practices in genetic care. One of these areas is the largely unregulated practice of genetic testing of minor children. Psychological and bioethical concerns have been raised about testing children at parental request when no immediate benefit will result. Several professional bodies have urged the adoption of guidelines that would limit parental choice in the testing process. This article argues that little data exists to support the creation of strict regulations, and also notes that analysis of this issue through the use of alternative ethical theory can yield useful directions for nurses attempting to navigate this controversial topic.
The incidence of cutaneous melanoma (CM) has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure, in the form of intermittent heavy exposure and severe sunburns in childhood, is believed to be the most important environmental contribution to CM risk. Genetic determinants also modulate CM risk, probably to a greater extent than environmental exposure. Certain heritable traits such as prominent numbers of common and atypical melanocytic nevi, skin type, dense UVR-induced freckling, and hair color are all known to be associated with increased CM risk. Very rarely, a heritable mutation in a high-risk gene renders the susceptible individual at extreme risk for CM. Families may carry one or more of the other high-risk phenotypic traits leading to uncertainty about how to quantify CM risk and provide management recommendations. Commercial genetic testing for the known high-risk inherited genetic mutations is available but is only relevant for those rare families likely to be carrying identifiable mutations. CM screening and risk intervention programs are being established internationally for families at markedly increased risk. Algorithms based on the level of risk are proposed.
PURPOSE: Physicians are ordering an increasing number of genetic tests. Results and additional information provided in the test result report are vital to the physician in making appropriate patient management decisions. Because variability in test result reports can impact patient care, we sought to determine whether variations exist in test reports for cystic fibrosis (CF) and factor V Leiden (fVL) with specific comparison to professional guidelines and recommendations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design analyzing for the presence of 16 critical elements in CF reports and 12 critical elements in fVL reports solicited from United States and Canadian laboratories. RESULTS: Of 44 laboratories performing CF testing and 72 laboratories performing fVL testing, 64% responded. For CF reports, 21% included ethnicity, 64% described methodology, and 61% discussed genetic counseling. For fVL reports, 80% described methodology and 52% discussed the need for genetic counseling in mutation-positive reports. CONCLUSIONS: Variability exists in report content among North American laboratories performing CF and fVL testing. Many reports lack information deemed critical by professional guidelines and recommendations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for tumors and germline genetic testing (GGT) inform precision therapy and clinical management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), and evidence is growing in support of universal paired CGP-GGT patient testing. However, the utility of combining CGP and GGT for early-stage CRC (ESC) and early-onset CRC (EOC) is unclear. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multisite study featuring GGT using an 80+ gene next-generation sequencing platform and exome-based CGP among CRC patients (unselected for age, stage, family history) receiving care at Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 150 CRC patients had GGT and exome-based CGP performed. ESC patients had an enrichment of high microsatellite instability and high tumor mutation burden. High microsatellite instability was also enriched in those with smoking history, and in tumors with mutated BRAF, homologous recombination deficiency, or at least 1 variant in the rat sarcoma virus pathway. Moreover, patients with smoking history were enriched in BRAF and other Tier 1 or 2 variants overall. Sixteen percent of patients harbored a pathogenic germline variant, most frequent being in Lynch syndrome genes. Paired GGT and CGP testing had high rates of clinically significant findings (≈70%) with the most frequent being high tumor mutation burden status. Pathway and mutational signature analysis revealed frequent CGP mutations in DNA repair and cell cycle pathways. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that universal, combined GGT-CGP increases clinical utility for EOC and ESC patients. This is key for EOC patients who tend to experience poorer outcomes. CGP-GGT expedites germline resolution for tumor mutations in hereditary cancer genes, reducing delays and facilitating identification of relevant therapies, clinical trials, and management recommendations.
The issues that arise in the development of genetic tests for prediction and diagnosis are described in the context of the authors' experience as laboratory directors in the USA. The goal is to identify gaps and weaknesses in the test validation process and to define the pivotal issues. Variables that influence a laboratory director's decision to develop a particular molecular genetic assay, including motivation, economics, intellectual property and the regulatory environment, are described. Issues of clinical and analytic validation are discussed, providing examples of tests with both good (cystic fibrosis carrier screening) and poor (apolipoprotein E genotyping for Alzheimer's disease) clinical utility. The decision-making process that occurs during the considered transition of a research-based molecular genetic assay into routine use in the clinical laboratory is summarized. Different factors will be weighted differently depending on the nature of the disease being tested, the complexity of its gene and mutations, the available technical platforms, potential regulatory and intellectual property restrictions, and whether the proposed test is to be offered by an academic or a commercial laboratory.
Wilson disease is an autosomal recessive inherited disorder of copper metabolism. The Wilson disease gene codes for a copper transporting P-type ATPase (ATP7B). Molecular genetic analysis reveals at least 300 distinct mutations. While most reported mutations occur in single families, a few are more common. The most common mutation in patients from Central, Eastern, and Northern Europe is the point mutation H1069Q (exon 14). About 50-80% of Wilson disease (WD) patients from these countries carry at least one allele with this mutation with an allele frequency ranging between 30 and 70%. Other common mutations in Central and Eastern Europe are located on exon 8 (2299insC, G710S), exon 15 (3400delC) and exon 13 (R969Q). The allele frequency of these mutations is lower than 10%. In Mediterranean countries there is a wide range of mutations, the frequency of each of them varies considerably from country to country. In Sardinia, a unique deletion in the 5' UTR (-441/-427 del) is very frequent. In mainland Spain the missense mutation M645R in exon 6 is particularly common. Data from non-European countries are scarce. Most data from Asia are from Far Eastern areas (China, South Korea and Japan) where the R778L missense mutation in exon 8 is found with an allele frequency of 14-49%. In summary, given the constant improvement of analytic tools genetic testing will become an integral part for the diagnosis of WD. Knowledge of the differences in the worldwide distribution of particular mutations will help to design shortcuts for genetic diagnosis of WD.
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that is currently not preventable or curable. Early-onset AD can be due to mutations in several autosomal dominant genes. Clinical testing is available for presenilin 1 (PS1), which is the most common of these genes. However, many practical and ethical issues must be considered before ordering this test for patients with early-onset AD. In this paper, we present a case that demonstrates the complexities of genetic testing for early-onset AD.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: We describe the insurance behaviour of subjects (n=271) who had previously taken a predictive genetic test for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC); 31% of them were mutation positive, indicating a high risk of cancer. One year after testing, subjects were sent a questionnaire including questions about their present life and health insurance before participation in the study, and their actual and planned purchase of the insurance policies during the testing programme which compromised a pre-test counseling session, a period for reflection, the testing, and a test disclosure session. RESULTS: Thirty percent reported that they already had a life insurance and 14% a health insurance before participating in the study. The mutation-positive subjects possessed a health insurance significantly more often than the mutation-negative individuals (21 vs. 11%, p=0.02) and similar trend was observed for life insurance (36 vs. 28%, p=0.12). Life and health insurance policies purchased just before testing was reported by 3 and 2% of the subjects, respectively. Life and health insurance policies purchased after testing were reported by 3 and <1% respectively, and planned purchase by 3 and 2%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups defined by mutation status in reports of life or health insurance behaviour during or after the programme. CONCLUSION: According to self-reported data, the mutation-positive subjects did not differ from the others in the purchase of life or health insurance policies. However, the mutation-positive individuals reported that they possessed health insurance policies before entering the study more often than their counterparts.
The purpose of this article is to provide a brief overview of the policy considerations underlying the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) workshop, "Genetic Testing: Policy Issues for the New Millennium," which was organised and hosted by the governments of the United Kingdom (UK) and Austria in Vienna, 23-25 February 2000, with the support of the European Commission (EC). It reviews the various topics presented at the meeting and offers a brief summary of its main conclusions.
Approximately 94% of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients lack both copies of SMN1 exon 7. We report our SMA genetic testing experience (total 1281 cases), using SMA linkage analysis (32 families), SMA diagnostic testing by PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) to detect the homozygous absence of SMN1 exon 7 (and exon 8) (533 cases), and an assay to determine copy number of SMN1 exon 7 (SMN1 gene dosage analysis) (716 cases). SMN1 gene dosage analysis is used for SMA carrier testing as well as for the confirmation of a heterozygous SMN1 deletion in symptomatic individuals who do not lack both copies of SMN1. We conclude that comprehensive SMA testing, including SMN1 deletion analysis, SMN1 gene dosage analysis, and linkage analysis, offers the most complete evaluation of SMA patients and their families.