Commentary--Looking at the effects of consumer-centric health plans on expenditures and utilization.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The authors compared the use of outpatient mental health services in a health maintenance organization (HMO) and fee-for-service plans over a 5-year period, using data from a randomized controlled trial. In any given year, enrollees in the HMO and a fee-for-service plan with identical benefits were equally likely to visit a mental health specialist. Over several years, the HMO enrollees were about 50% more likely ever to visit a mental health specialist; fee-for-service enrollees were more likely to receive mental health care in more than 1 study year.
BACKGROUND: Health plans are using 3-tier copayment designs and other methods to control utilization that shifts drug costs to plan members. There is a need to determine the effects of increased member cost sharing on drug utilization and drug costs. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a 10 US dollars increase in prescription copayment in a public employer health plan for 2 classes of drugs used for allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Changes in the number of prescriptions dispensed for 2 therapeutic classes.low-sedating antihistamines (LSAs) and nasal steroids (NSs).were examined 1 year prior to and 1 year after copayment increase. Relative price effects were measured as arc price elasticity, the ratio of the percent change in prescription utilization over the percent change in price, an indicator of how responsive patients are to the copayment increase. RESULTS: Of 8,643 continuously enrolled health plan beneficiaries, 2,150 patients (24.8%) received at least 1 NS or LSA during the 2-year period of the study, from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 1999. An average 10 US dollars increase in copayment per prescription was associated with no statistically significant change in utilization of combined LSA and NS prescriptions, 2.89 per patient in 1998 and 2.94 in 1999 (P = 0.597). Health plan costs for study drugs, unadjusted for inflation, decreased by 16.3% from 86.86 US dollars per patient in 1998 to 72.68 US dollars in 1999 (P = 0.004). Health plan costs per patient per month (PPPM) for all drugs for the 2,150 allergic rhinitis patients decreased by 13% from 41.33 US dollars PPPM in 1998 to 35.93 US dollars in 1999 (P<0.001), and health plan drug costs for all 8,643 members decreased by 13% from 14.93 US dollars per member per month (PMPM) in 1998 to 12.99 US dollars in 1999 (P<0.001). The actual average copayment increase was 7.23 US dollars (a 41% increase) for LSAs, which was associated with a 14.8% increase in utilization of LSAs and an 11.8% increase in the number of patients using LSAs; the number of LSA prescriptions per patient per year was unchanged at 2.68 in 1999 versus 2.61 in 1998 (P = 0.429). The actual average copayment increase was 10.98 US dollars (71%) for NSs, which was associated with an 11.3% decrease in utilization of NSs and a 10.2% decrease in the number of users of nasals steroids in 1999; the number of nasal steroid prescriptions per patient per year was unchanged at 2.05 in 1999 versus 2.07 in 1998 (P =.842). The combined utilization of LSA and NS prescriptions increased by 8.9% following the increase in copayments for these 2 therapeutically interchangeable drugs for allergic rhinitis. LSA prescriptions were less elastic, with an unadjusted arc elasticity of 0.39, while nasal steroid prescriptions were more responsive to the copayment change, with an unadjusted arc elasticity of.0.22. CONCLUSIONS: An average 10 US dollars increase in patient cost sharing per prescription (46.9% copayment increase) was associated with an increase in combined utilization of 2 drug classes used for allergic rhinitis (LSAs and NSs) but no change in the number of prescriptions per patient. Health plan costs decreased significantly for allergic rhinitis drugs, all drugs used by allergic rhinitis patients, and all drugs used by continuously enrolled health plan members. NSs exhibited a greater arc price elasticity compared with low-sedating oral antihistamines.
BACKGROUND: Mental health benefits have traditionally been much less generous than benefits for physical health care, with separate deductibles, higher copayments or coinsurance, and lower limits on covered services, a trend that continues despite a recent wave of 'parity' legislation. In spite of the current policy debates on mental health insurance reforms, little is known about the burden of mental health out-of-pocket expenditures. AIMS OF THE STUDY: This study examines differences in out-of-pocket expenditures and their burden across different populations, stratified by insurance status, age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic groups. METHODS: This study uses the 1998 HealthCare for Communities household survey, the latest national survey data that are currently available, to measure the burden of out-of-pocket mental health expenditures. We use several measures of burden such as total out-of-pocket expenditures, their share of total treatment costs, and their share of family income. To address the methodological issues that arise in the calculation of the relative measures of burden (e.g. outliers, measurement error, systematic underreporting) we consider three different approaches that have been suggested in the literature and discuss their relative advantages given the type of data typically available. RESULTS: Although there is a common perception that out-of-pocket expenditures for mental health services represent a significant burden for service users, the estimates suggest that this is not the case. In fact, across the three measures of out-of-pocket expenditures as a share of income the estimates are under 10 percent for most groups. However, there is some variation in burden across groups with people who are older, uninsured, or minority spending a larger share of their income out-of-pocket. Since many insurance plans have limits on the number of visits covered and on the total amount that the insurer will pay for mental health services, the share of total mental health expenditures that are paid by individuals is another important measure of the burden faced by people with mental health service needs. We estimate that the mean out-of-pocket share of total expenditures for the group as a whole is 25 percent. In addition, we find that the burden varies across groups with older, more educated, or privately insured individuals paying a larger share of expenditures out-of-pocket. DISCUSSION: Although the overall picture regarding the burden of out-of-pocket costs relative to income is encouraging, it is also important to keep in mind that individuals make treatment decisions based on their available income. The fact that the burden of actual out-of-pocket payments is relatively low may also reflect decisions to forego potentially valuable care. Nevertheless, the results for mental health do not suggest that out-of-pocket costs are currently a major burden for most users. This situation may reflect a major change from the past given the recent shifts towards managed care, however there are no comparable data available to test this hypothesis empirically. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY FORMULATION AND FURTHER RESEARCH: It may be tempting to attribute the low estimates of out-of-pocket expenditures as a share of income in this paper to recent parity legislation. However, recent research shows that parity legislation has not led to significant changes in benefit design. In fact the high ratio of out-of-pocket payments relative to total mental health care expenditures presented in this paper are consistent with a limited role of parity legislation. Another possible explanation for the observed results is the growth of managed care and the shift in treatment style towards greater use of medications, which are comprehensively covered in most private insurance plans, has reduced total treatment costs and consequently the size of out-of-pocket payments.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Using data from a randomized trial in health insurance, this paper examines the effect of cost sharing on use of dental services. The data come from a sample of the nonaged, noninstitutionalized civilian population of six urban and rural sites. We find that: reducing the level of cost sharing increases demand for dental services; and dental expenses rise 46% when the coinsurance rate falls from 95% to 0%, subject to a catastrophic limit on out-of-pocket expenses. Of this increase, two-thirds is attributable to an increase in the likelihood of visiting a dentist during the year. Moreover, there is a substantial surge in demand during the first year of more generous coverage. The first-year response to cost sharing is nearly twice the second-year response.
BACKGROUND: Health services researchers have increasingly used hazard functions to examine illness or treatment episode lengths and related treatment utilization and treatment costs. There has been little systematic hazard analysis, however, of mental health/substance abuse (MH/SA) treatment episodes. AIMS OF THE STUDY: This article uses proportional hazard functions to characterize multiple treatment episodes for a sample of insured clients with at least one alcohol or drug treatment diagnosis over a three-year period. It addresses the lengths and timing of treatment episodes, and the relationships of episode lengths to the types and locations of earlier episodes. It also identifies a problem that occurs when a portion of the sample observations is ǣpossibly censored. Failure to account for sample censoring will generate biased hazard function estimates, but treating all potentially censored observations as censored will overcompensate for the censoring bias. METHODS: Using insurance claims data, the analysis defines health care treatment episodes as all events that follow the initial event irrespective of diagnosis, so long as the events are not separated by more than 30 days. The distribution of observations ranges from 1 day to 3 years, and individuals have up to 10 episodes. Due to the data collection process, observations may be right censored if the episode is either ongoing at the time that data collection starts, or when the data collection effort ends. The Andersen-Gill (AG) and Wei-Lin-Weissfeld (WLW) estimation methods are used to address relationships among individuals multiple episodes. These methods are then augmented by a probit censoring model that estimates censoring probability and adjusts estimated behavioral coefficients and related treatment utilization and treatment costs. There has been little systematic hazard analysis, however, of mental health/substance abuse (MH/SA) treatment episodes. RESULTS: Five sets of variables explain episode duration: (i) individual; (ii) insurance; (iii) employer; (iv) binary, indicating episode diagnosis, location, and sequence; and (v) linkage, relating current diagnoses to previous diagnoses in a sequence. Sociodemographic variables such as age or gender have impacts at both the individual and at the firm level. Coinsurance rates and deductibles also have impacts at the individual and the firm levels. Binary variables indicate that surgical/outpatient episodes were the shortest, and psychiatric/outpatient episodes were the longest. Linkage variables reveal significant impacts of prior alcoholism, drug, and psychiatric episodes on the lengths of subsequent episodes. DISCUSSION: Health care treatment episodes are linked to each other both by diagnosis and by treatment location. Both the AG and the WLW models have merit for treating multiple episodes. The AG model permits more flexibility in estimating hazards, and allows researchers to model impacts of prior diagnoses on future episodes. The WLW model provides a convenient way to examine impacts of sociodemographic variables across episodes. It also provides efficient pooled estimates of coefficients and their standard errors. LIMITATIONS: The insurance claims data set covers 1989 through 1991, predating current managed care plans. It cannot identify untreated substance abusers, nor can it identify those with out-of-plan use. It provides treatment information only if services are covered by the insurance plan and are defined with a substance abuse diagnosis code. Like medical records, insurance claims will not specify substance abuse treatment received within the context of other health care (and thus identified by a non-substance abuse diagnosis code) or community services. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND RESEARCH: This article characterizes multiple health treatment episodes for a sample of insured clients with at least one alcohol or drug treatment diagnosis within a three-year period. We identify both individual and employer effects on episode length. We find that episode lengths vary by the diagnosis type, and that the lengths (and by inference cost and utilization) may depend on the treatments that occurred in previous episodes. We also recognize that health care or illness episodes may be ongoing at times of health care events prior to the ends of data collection periods, leading to uncertain episode lengths. Corresponding estimates of costs or utilization are also uncertain. We provide a method that adjusts the episode lengths according to the probability of censoring.
More than 200,000 dogs insured for veterinary care by one Swedish company at the beginning of 1996 were included in a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data from receipts for visits to veterinarians that were part of reimbursed veterinary care events, whose cost exceeded the deductible cost, were used to calculate the risk of cause-specific morbidity, both in total and stratified by gender, age and breed. Diagnoses were described by organic system, for example, cardiovascular, and by disease process, for example, neoplastic The most commonly affected system was the integument followed by the gastrointestinal and genital systems. The genital system was the most commonly affected system in females, within which 50 per cent of the affected bitches had pyometra. Inflammatory processes were most common, followed by symptomatic conditions, traumatic injuries and neoplastic conditions.
In the early years of the Medicare program, proportionally more whites than non-whites among the aged used Medicare services. This article examines the use and reimbursement of Medicare services by the aged between 1967 and 1976 to determine if racial differences still exist. To do so, three measures are studied. The first, the number of persons reimbursed for Medicare service per 1,000 enrollees, measures access to Medicare's reimbursement system. The second, reimbursement per person using reimbursed services, measures the amount of reimbursement received after persons exceed Medicare deductibles. The third, reimbursement per enrollee, indicates the combined effect of access and reimbursement and represents a measure of equity for the population at risk. Analysis of the three measures by type of Medicare service found that the disparities in use and reimbursement of services by race decreased considerably between 1967 and 1976. This trend was found both at the national and at the regional level. Overall, the decreases in the disparity measured are note-worthy. By type of service, proportionally more whites than non-whites still receive reimbursement. However, once non-whites exceed deductibles, the reimbursements per person using reimbursed services are generally comparable or higher than reimbursement to whites.
The aim of this study was to explore the impact of out-of-pocket costs on Dutch general practitioners' prescribing. A qualitative study using focus groups was conducted. An open-ended topic guide was used to elucidate the influence of out-of-pocket costs on decision making for the treatment of dyspepsia, hay fever, hormone replacement therapy, and hypertension. A total of 21 Dutch GPs from University Departments of General Practice participated in four separate focus groups. These discussions were held between November 1998 and March 1999. Each discussion was tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. From this transcription, key factors and issues were identified. GPs reported that they do not generally take out-of-pocket costs into account. Fully reimbursed drugs were usually prescribed and GPs felt that most patients were highly motivated and thus willing to pay for their medication. The patient charges were seen to be low and not likely to affect patients' willingness to pay. GPs felt that patients need not have to pay for their medication. They adjusted their drug choice in order to avoid co-payment and were willing to agree to a patient's demand for a reimbursed prescription. GPs describe their prescribing as not influenced by out-of-pocket costs. GPs seem inclined to avoid co-payment for patients when patients have financial difficulties and the disease is perceived as severe. They chose fully reimbursed drugs.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been defined largely in relation to conventional biomedicine. CAM therapies that are used instead of conventional medicine are termed "alternative." CAM therapies used alongside conventional medicine are said to be "complementary." "Integrative medicine" results from the thoughtful incorporation of concepts, values, and practices from alternative, complementary, and conventional medicines. The evolving process of integration between CAM and conventional medicine evokes new conceptual frameworks, as well as new terminology. Interview-based qualitative research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison seeks to probe and develop this theoretical structure. Interviews with users and practitioners of CAM therapies have revealed four primary themes: holism, empowerment, access, and legitimacy (HEAL). These themes characterize CAM and contrast it with conventional medicine. CAM is said to be more holistic and empowering yet less legitimate than conventional medicine. CAM is more intuitive; conventional is more deductive. While CAM is perhaps more psychologically accessible to many patients in that it better reflects commonly held values, it is often less financially and institutionally accessible, at least for those with conventional health insurance and limited income. Substantive barriers--including economic, organizational and scientific differences, as well as an apparent widespread lack of understanding--continue to thwart attempts at integration. More and better evidence is needed if CAM therapies are to be accepted by mainstream medicine. State-of-the-art research methods developed by conventional science will be needed to test CAM therapies. Conventional medicine, however, has much to learn from CAM. By incorporating a more holistic, empowering and accessible therapeutic approach, conventional medicine could build on its present legitimacy, and thereby enhance its power to "HEAL."
OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the impact of increasing cost sharing on use of outpatient mental health services. METHOD: A quasi-experimental design was used to study outpatient utilization by members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) who were subject to increasing copayments for mental health visits (state government employees and dependents). Their outpatient mental health utilization was compared with that of similar HMO members who were not subject to cost sharing (federal government employees and dependents). Analyses compared both likelihood of any service use and number of visits per year among service users. RESULTS: Institution of $20/visit copayments was associated with a 16% decrease in likelihood of service use but no change in visit rate among service users. A subsequent copayment increase to $30/visit resulted in no significant change in likelihood of use but was associated with a 9% decrease in visits per year among those using services. The impact of the first copayment change on likelihood of using services did not vary according to level of clinical need (as measured by prior service use and psychotropic drug use). CONCLUSIONS: In this staff-model HMO, modest visit copayments significantly reduced initial access to mental health treatment and had a smaller effect on treatment intensity. Copayments restricted access regardless of clinical need. Designers of mental health benefits must consider the impact of copayments on those with the greatest need for treatment.
Based on a survey of 2,122 randomly selected public and private employers, this paper reports on the state of employer-sponsored health insurance in spring 2006, including recent changes. Premiums increased 7.7 percent from spring 2005 to spring 2006 and have risen 68 percent since 2001. About 4 percent of workers are enrolled in high-deductible health plans with savings options. The percentage of workers covered by their own employer did not statistically change from 2005 to 2006.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine who chooses a Consumer-Driven Health Plan (CDHP) in a multiplan, multiproduct setting, and, specifically, whether the CDHP attracts the sicker employees in a company's risk pool. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated a health plan choice equation for employees of the University of Minnesota, who had a choice in 2002 of a CDHP and three other health plans--a traditional health maintenance organization (HMO), a preferred provider organization (PPO), and a tiered network product based on care systems. Data from an employee survey were matched to information from the university's payroll system. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Chronic illness of the employee or family members had no effect on choice of the CDHP, but such employees tended to choose the PPO. The employee's age was not related to CDHP choice. Higher-income employees chose the CDHP, as well as those who preferred health plans with a national provider panel that includes their physician in the panel. Employees tended to choose plans with lower out-of-pocket premiums, and surprisingly, employees with a chronic health condition themselves or in their family were more price-sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence on who chooses a CDHP in a multiplan, multiproduct setting. The CDHP was not chosen disproportionately by the young and healthy, but it did attract the wealthy and those who found the availability of providers more appealing. Low out-of-pocket premiums are important features of health plans and in this setting, low premiums appeal to those who are less healthy.
The present study analyzes demographic data on 920 physicians who lost their coverage and applied to a "surplus-lines" company that insures essentially all applicants. Our analysis reveals that (1) some specialties are heavily overrepresented in the surplus-lines pool, (2) physicians aged 45 to 54 years are also overrepresented, (3) board certification is seen as frequently in the surplus-lines group as in the US physician population, and (4) the percentage of foreign medical graduates in the surplus-lines pool is virtually the same as that in the US physician population. A model of the actuarial process by which claims data can lead to termination of standard coverage suggests that disproportionate representation of high-risk specialties is not simply a function of a high average claims rate. We also show that, in contrast to joint underwriting associations, surplus-lines companies impose high premiums, large deductibles, and restrictions on practice, all of which are likely to reduce the frequency of negligent behavior.