PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Vacuum-assisted delivery.

Unsuccessful vacuum extraction, cup detachment and failed anterior rotation in occipitoposterior positions are commonly associated with obstetric factors that are avoidable or correctable. These factors include the preferential use of soft vacuum cups, incorrect cup applications and attempts to deliver with the vacuum extractor before the cervix is completely dilated. Evidence from randomized trials demonstrates that soft cups cause fewer cosmetic effects and scalp lacerations than rigid cups. Soft cups do not reduce the incidence of cephalhaematomas nor have they been shown to provide any advantage over rigid cups for the prevention of subgaleal haemorrhage. Clinically significant subgaleal haemorrhage and intracranial injury are almost always preceded by difficult vacuum extraction. Although the vacuum extractor is less likely than forceps to injure the mother's genital tract and anal sphincters at delivery, no significant differences have been demonstrated between the instruments in terms of subsequent urinary or bowel disturbances.

Birth Injuries↗
PubMed1975

[About the choice of extraction instrument for vaginal operative termination in vertex presentation (author's transl)].

The common separation of indications at the First University Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology in Vienna concerning the choice of extraction instrument in cases of operative termination of vaginal delivery out of vertex position is being demonstrated. When there is only a slight increase of resistance in the delivery mechanism, when the child is mature, when there is no attitude of deflexion, and where there is no real reason for a speedy termination of delivery, the vacuum extractor comes into use. In cases of child emergency, of considerable increase of delivery mechanism resistance, of immaturity and attitude of deflexion, an extraction by means of obstetrical forceps is performed. Out of 547 deliveries terminated by means of extraction the sub- and postpartal mortality amounted to 2,19%. The number of prematures (7,5%) in this material did not differ from the total delivery material of the clinic. After forceps extraction 5 out of 419 children (2,8%) died. After vacuum extraction one child out of 105 (0,95%) died. In 23 cases where obstetrical forceps had to be used after vacuum extraction 2 children died (8,7%). The morbidity of the children was measured by means of the Apgar Score and of the injury frequency. Here the two extraction methods showed no significant differencies. The combined application of both extraction instruments however, showed an increase of morbidity. Injuries of the mother were almost exclusively found after forceps extraction.

Apgar Score↗
PubMed2000

Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.

BACKGROUND: Proponents of vacuum delivery argue that it should be chosen first for assisted vaginal delivery, because it is less likely to injure the mother. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of vacuum extraction compared to forceps, on failure to achieve delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. Date of last search: February 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Acceptably controlled comparisons of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials were included. The trials were of reasonable quality. Use of the vacuum extractor for assisted vaginal delivery when compared to forceps delivery was associated with significantly less maternal trauma (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.50) and with less general and regional anaesthesia. There were more deliveries with vacuum extraction (odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.19). Fewer caesarean sections were carried out in the vacuum extractor group. However the vacuum extractor was associated with an increase in neonatal cephalhaematomata and retinal haemorrhages. Serious neonatal injury was uncommon with either instrument. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Use of the vacuum extractor rather than forceps for assisted delivery appears to reduce maternal morbidity. The reduction in cephalhaematoma and retinal haemorrhages seen with forceps may be a compensatory benefit.

Extraction, Obstetrical↗
PubMed1987

Birth progression and traction forces developed under vacuum extraction after slow or rapid application of suction.

A vacuum extraction recorder was used to provide an objective measure of the traction forces developed on the fetal head during 120 vacuum extractions. In half of the deliveries the vacuum was gradually and stepwise increased to -0.8 kg/cm2 before traction. In the others, a rapid application of vacuum to the same level was chosen. No significant difference could be recorded in the traction forces developed by the different methods. In fact, once an adequate level of vacuum had been achieved, high degrees of traction could be applied to the suction cup, regardless of the rate at which the vacuum was developed. Furthermore, the number and nature of neonatal complications were not influenced by the method chosen.

Birth Injuries↗
PubMed1976

The importance of flexion in vacuum extractor delivery.

Two modifications of Malmstrom's cup were used in a study of the position of the cup in 500 vacuum extractor deliveries. The incidence of completely flexing applications varied from 0 to 92 per cent according to the level of the head and the position of the occiput when the cup was applied and, in occipito-posterior positions, the type of cup that was used. With mid-cavity occipito-posterior positions it was 30 per cent with one modification (suction tube attached eccentrically to the dome of the cup--the "modified" cup) and 92 per cent with the other (tube attached to the lateral wall of the cup--the "occipito-posterior cup" or "OP cup"). The high incidence of face-to-pubis or occipitio-lateral delivery when cups with a dome-attached suction tube were used in mid-cavity occipito-posterior positions was found to be largely the result of deflexing applications. It was concluded that cups of this type are unsuitable for use in these cases. A study of two large series of vacuum extractor operations suggested that failed vacuum extractor rates can be reduced by using cups that are manoeuvreable and which accept stronger oblique traction than Malmstrom's cup.

Extraction, Obstetrical↗
PubMed1989

Cervagem/Dilapan for preoperative cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration for termination of first trimester pregnancy. A prospective randomized study.

The present study included 40 healthy nulliparous women admitted to the hospital for termination of first trimester pregnancy. The patients were randomly allocated to two study groups. One group was treated for 4 hours with one 1 mg Cervagem vaginal suppository prior to vacuum aspiration, the other was treated 4 hours with a Dilapan osmotic dilator intracervically. The patients were continuously supervised during treatment and after operation. Side effects and analgesic consumption were recorded. At operation the degree of cervical dilatation, blood loss and operative complications was registered. Dilapan was more effective and more uniform in dilating the cervix (p less than 0.05) and eventual further dilatation was easier (p less than 0.05). The blood loss was higher in the Dilapan-treated group (p less than 0.05). Side effects of postoperative pain and use of analgesic injections were higher in the Cervagem group (p less than 0.05). It is concluded that both methods are effective in dilating the cervix prior to vacuum aspiration, with Dilapan being the more effective dilator with the lower frequency of side effects.

Abortion, Induced↗