SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrectomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

[Retrospective comparative study of extended nephrectomies by surgery and by retroperitoneal laparoscopy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of radical retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in terms of tolerance, morbidity and oncologic control. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 22 radical nephrectomies have been carried out by retroperitoneal laparoscopy. One surgical conversion has been necessary. This series has been retrospectively compared to 16 radical nephrectomies by open surgery. RESULTS: Both series were comparable. Operative time was not significantly different in the two groups. Blood loss was less with laparoscopic surgery (p < 10-3). We did not see any difference in antalgic consumption during the first post-operative day and in intensive care and hospital stay. Post-operative complications were less in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.04). We observed no death or reccurrence with a mean follow-up of 8.7 months for the laparoscopy group vs 32.2 for the open group. CONCLUSIONS: Radical retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is a recent surgical technique which has the same oncologic standards as open surgery. Blood loss and post-operative complications are significantly reduced. Survival needs to be evaluated on long term follow-up.

Female↗

PubMed1975

Nephrectomy in selected patients with severe refractory hypertension receiving dialysis.

The effect of bilateral nephrectomy was examined in ten patients with severe hypertension in whom dialysis and multiple drug therapy had not resulted in blood pressure control and was compared with that in 15 patients undergoing nephrectomy solely in preparation for transplantation. A highly significant, P less than 0.0005, and clinically impressive reduction in mean blood pressure occurred in the first group of patients, permitting discontinuation of all drugs. Although impossible to quantitate, these patients also demonstrated a reversal of a failure-to-thrive syndrome which had seriously compromides prenephrectomy management. Nephrectomy resulted in a reduction in mean hematocrit values of greater than 20 per cent and less than or equal to 20 percent showed a significant fall in the former but not in the latter. No increase in transfusion requirements developed in these patients. Until more potent and reliable medical therapy becomes generally availabe, nephrectomy will remain an important treatment modality in those patients requiring dialysis and having severe unremitting hypertension.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed2001

Renal outcome 25 years after donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: The extended outcome after kidney donation has been a particular concern ever since the recognition of hyperfiltration injury. Few published reports have examined donor renal outcome after 20 years or greater. Kidney transplantation has been performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation since 1963, at which there is extensive experience with live donor transplantation. We assess the impact of donor nephrectomy on renal function, urinary protein excretion and development of hypertension postoperatively to examine whether renal deterioration occurs with followup after 20 years or greater. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1963 to 1975, 180 live donor nephrectomies were performed at the Cleveland Clinic. We attempted to contact all patients to request participation in our study. Those 70 patients who agreed to participate in the study were mailed a package containing a 24-hour urine container (for assessment of creatinine, and total protein and albumin), a vial for blood collection (for assessment of serum creatinine) and a medical questionnaire. All specimens were returned to and processed by the Cleveland Clinic medical laboratories. Blood pressure was taken and recorded by a local physician. A 24-hour creatinine clearance and the Cockcroft-Gault formula were used to estimate renal function, and values were compared with an age adjusted glomerular filtration rate for a solitary kidney. RESULTS: Mean patient followup was 25 years. The 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance decreased to 72% of the value before donation. For the entire study cohort serum creatinine and systolic blood pressure after donation were significantly increased compared with values before, although still in the normal range. The overall incidence of hypertension was comparable to that expected in the age matched general population. There was no gender or age difference (younger or older than 50 years) for 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance, or change in serum creatinine before or after donation. Urinary protein and albumin excretion after donation was significantly higher in males compared with females. There were 13 (19%) subjects who had a 24-hour urinary protein excretion that was greater than 0.15 gm./24 hours, 5 (7%) of whom had greater than 0.8. No gender difference was noted in blood pressure, and there were no significant changes in diastolic pressure based on gender or age. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, renal function is well preserved with a mean followup of 25 years after donor nephrectomy. Males had significantly higher protein and albumin excretion than females but no other clinically significant differences in renal function, blood pressure or proteinuria were noted between them or at age of donation. Proteinuria increases with marginal significance but appears to be of no clinical consequence in most patients. Patients with mild or borderline proteinuria before donation may represent a subgroup at particular risk for the development of significant proteinuria 20 years or greater after donation. The overall incidence of proteinuria in our study is in the range of previously reported values after donor nephrectomy.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal conditions.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory and infectious renal conditions may result in severe perirenal fibrosis, making the laparoscopic approach challenging. The theoretical advantages of laparoscopy for managing inflammatory and infectious renal conditions have been questioned. We identified whether laparoscopy for inflammatory renal conditions is associated with higher morbidity than for other benign renal conditions. Furthermore, several technical modifications are discussed that may help to improve the outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory and infectious renal conditions between 1998 and 2000. The transperitoneal approach was used and specimens were removed after morcellation. Operative data were compared with those from a similar group of patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy for other benign conditions. RESULTS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy done for inflammatory or infectious conditions in 12 cases and for other benign conditions in 9 matched cases was completed successfully in 10 (83%) and 9 (100%), respectively. In the inflammatory and benign groups mean blood loss plus or minus standard deviation was 155 +/- 163 and 59 +/- 23 ml. (p = 0.099), mean operative time was 284 +/- 126 and 226 +/- 62 minutes (p = 0.225), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.1 +/- 2 and 3 +/- 1 days (p = 0.157), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy can be performed safely in most cases of inflammatory renal conditions. Although they were not statistically significant, a higher conversion rate and longer operative time should be expected. Early conversion may be required due to failure to progress. Similar advantages were observed in patients with inflammatory and other benign renal conditions via the laparoscopic approach.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter?

PURPOSE: Although many groups recommend a surgical margin of 1 to 2 cm., to our knowledge the amount of normal renal parenchyma that must be excised during partial nephrectomy for stages T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma to ensure a safe margin has never been critically evaluated. We investigated whether the size of the surgical margin has any effect on recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All partial nephrectomies performed for localized renal cell carcinoma at our institution from 1988 to 1999 were retrospectively analyzed via a review of hospital records, pathology reports and histological slides. Parenchymal margin status was assessed and quantified by microscopy. Followup data were obtained via patient chart review and telephone interview. Average negative margin size and postoperative followup were determined, and renal cell carcinoma recurrence was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 44 partial nephrectomies were performed with a mean followup of 49 months (range 8 to 153). Mean tumor size was 3.22 cm. (range 1.3 to 10). Surgical margins were negative for malignancy in 41 cases and positive in 3. All patients with negative margins were without local recurrence at followup except 1 with a recurrent mass adjacent to the kidney at a site distant from the original lesion. Mean and median size of the negative margins was 0.25 and 0.2 cm., respectively (range 0.05 to 0.7). In the 3 cases with positive margins there was no evidence of disease at 39 and 62 months of followup in 2, while multiple local and metastatic recurrences developed in 1. CONCLUSIONS: No patient with negative parenchymal margins after nephron sparing surgery for stages T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma had local recurrence at the resection site at a mean followup of 49 months. Margin size was irrelevant. Only a minimal margin of normal renal parenchyma of less than 5 mm. must be removed during partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We report the detailed technique and results of transvaginal extraction of the intact laparoscopic radical nephrectomy specimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since June 2000, 10 select female patients with a median age of 67 years underwent transvaginal extraction of the intact specimen after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. In 5 patients open surgery had previously been performed on the uterus, including transabdominal hysterectomy in 2 and cesarean section in 3. Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in 5 cases each. After completion of the primary laparoscopic procedure a sponge stick was externally inserted into the sterile prepared vagina and tautly positioned in the posterior fornix. Laparoscopically a transverse posterior colpotomy was created at the apex of the tented up posterior fornix and the drawstring of the entrapped specimen was delivered into the vagina. After laparoscopic exit was completed the patient was placed in the supine lithotomy position. The specimen was extracted intact via the vagina and the posterior colpotomy incision was repaired transvaginally. Patients were mailed a linear scale analog questionnaire to assess various aspects of recovery with responses graded from 0--no pain and/or change to 10--severe pain and/or change. RESULTS: Vaginal extraction was successful in all 10 patients. Median operative time for the vaginal extraction procedure was 35 minutes. Blood loss was minimal. Median tumor size was 3.6 cm. (range 2.4 to 7.4) and median specimen weight was 327 gm. (range 152 to 484). No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperatively blood spotting via the vagina in 1 patient resolved spontaneously. Postoperative questionnaires revealed excellent patient satisfaction and convalescence. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal extraction is an efficacious and minimally morbid technique for removing the intact entrapped specimen after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. It has now become our preferred technique of intact specimen extraction in appropriate female patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

[Esthetic and functional results of the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach in nephrectomy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the aesthetic and functional sequelae of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomies were performed between 1996 and 1999. Four trocars were used in 9 patients and 3 trocars were used in 12 patients. In all patients of the series, nephrectomy was performed without manual assistance and the kidney was extracted from the iliac fossa after enlarging a trocar orifice. A questionnaire evaluating the aesthetic sequelae of the operation, resumption of everyday activities and the patient's general satisfaction was sent to each patient by mail. RESULTS: 17 patients completed the questionnaire after a mean follow-up of 12.2 months (range: 2 to 33 months). Scars were cosmetically satisfactory in 100% of cases, painless in 100% of cases and were considered to be invisible in 58.8% of cases. All patients were satisfied with the operation, but only 70.6% would have recommended this procedure to a friend or relative. 57.1% of the patients hospitalised for less than 5 days considered the hospital stay to be too brief and 42.9% considered it to be barely sufficient. Time to resumption of everyday activity varied considerably (7 to 70 days) with a mean of 32 days and was not correlated with operative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy achieves good aesthetic and functional results, but patients are not satisfied with the short hospital stay. Resumption of everyday activity does not appear to depend on the postoperative course.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Subjective and objective comparison of critical care pathways for open donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: In the era of minimally invasive techniques and cost containment, care pathways after donor nephrectomy are important. While open donor nephrectomy remains the established procedure, questions regarding the surgical approach, postoperative care and patient morbidity/dissatisfaction have surfaced. We compared results of standard and fast-track care pathways after donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and August 1999, 60 patients underwent open donor nephrectomy. By surgeon preference, patients received either ketorolac only (31), ketorolac plus morphine spinal (17) or patient controlled anesthesia (12). Data related to surgery, hospital course and cost were reviewed. Patients were surveyed regarding return to daily activities and groups were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The mean dose per patient was 183 (ketorolac only), 180 (ketorolac plus morphine spinal) and 69 (patient controlled analgesia) mg. Median hospital stay was 2 days for the fast-track pathways (ketorolac only, ketorolac plus morphine spinal) compared to 3 days for the patient controlled analgesia group (p <0.001). Delayed oral intake was seen in 6% of patients on ketorolac only and 3% for those on ketorolac plus morphine spinal compared to 83% of the patient controlled analgesia group (p <0.001). Return to exercise (median weeks, p <0.79) was 2 for the ketorolac only group, 3.5 for ketorolac plus morphine spinal and 3.5 for patient controlled analgesia. Mean global cost was $9,394 for the ketorolac only group, $9,238 for ketorolac plus morphine spinal and $11,601 for patient controlled analgesia (p <0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Fast-track pathways significantly shortened hospital stay and quickened oral intake. Cost was significantly contained using new pathways. Resumption of daily activities was comparable among the groups. Comparisons of critical care pathways are required to optimize patient care after kidney donation. Prospective trials are needed to verify our results.

Analgesia, Epidural↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: why not?

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has undergone explosive worldwide growth as the method of choice for removal of living donor kidneys. However, the method does have some distinct disadvantages as well. The objective is to define real and potential difficulties with the generalized uncritical acceptance of this surgical technique. METHODS: The literature and personal experience at the largest laparoscopic donor program were reviewed and consolidated. Critical areas of technique and management were analyzed. RESULTS: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has increased the pool of willing potential renal donors. In experienced has the recipient renal function results are equivalent to open nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There are risks in performing the operation to the donor and to the allograft. These risks are potentially catastrophic and mitigate against any casual attitudes about embarking on a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2002

[What is the impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma?].

The impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is discussed herein with consideration of prolonged survival and quality of life. A nephrectomy can be indicated in a patient with good performance status and pulmonary metastases when adjuvant immunotherapy is an option. In contrast, in a patient with poor performance status and/or metastases including multiple organs, a nephrectomy is not indicated. To relieve symptoms, options other than nephrectomy should be considered.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

PubMed2003

Effect of unilateral nephrectomy on the pharmacokinetics of atenolol in humans.

Unilateral nephrectomy is a common surgical procedure and involves functional adaptation of the remaining kidney. There is a paucity of data addressing whether drugs eliminated predominantly through the urinary tract, such as atenolol, can be effectively handled by unilaterally nephrectomized patients. This study was carried out in 28 subjects 1 month (10 subjects) and 1 year (10 subjects) after unilateral nephrectomy, as well as in 8 healthy volunteers who were administered atenolol as a single oral dose of 100 mg. Pharmacokinetic parameters of atenolol were calculated using a one-compartment open model. It was revealed that atenolol blood serum concentrations were significantly elevated in nephrectomized patients as compared with the control subjects, especially 1 month after the surgery. Patients nephrectomized 1 month prior to the study were characterized by an increase in AUC by 43% (p < 0.05), reduction of lambda z by 36% (p < 0.001) and CLT by 27% (p < 0.001), and prolongation of t1/2 by 60% (p < 0.001) in comparison with healthy volunteers. The values of atenolol pharmacokinetic parameters in patients 1 year after unilateral nephrectomy did not differ significantly as compared to the controls. However, a trend indicating an impaired elimination was noted. A decrease in lambda z by 16%, prolongation of t1/2 by 32%, and reduction of CLT by 32% were observed. The results suggest that unilateral nephrectomy impairs elimination of atenolol and possibly other drugs predominantly eliminated via the kidney.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2003

[Manually-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in a living donor].

Manually assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy from a live donor combines the advantage of a mini-invasive approach with the advantage of the assisting hand in the abdominal cavity to which the surgeon is used from classical operations. The authors performed the first nephrectomy from a live donor by this method on May 13, 2002. Our initial experience with five nephrectomies by this method indicate that every subsequent operation was shorter and the period of warm ischemia was also shorter. There was no postoperative complication. In the second operation suppuration of the minilaparotomy occurred which protracted hospitalization and the convalescent period. The prerequisite of these operations is a certain amount of experience with laparoscopic operations. This type of nephrectomy has the general advantages of a miniinvasive approach, i.e. greater postoperative comfort and a shorter convalescence as compared with an open operation. The period of warm ischaemia does not differ markedly from nephrectmies by the classical procedure.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

[Microalbuminuria after unilateral nephrectomy in humans: study of effects of dietary protein].

Microalbuminuria may be due to increased glomerular capillary pressure. In turn, this increased pressure may be associated to augmented protein intake or reduction of renal mass. 85 normal subjects who had a unilateral nephrectomy were studied. Creatinine clearance, microalbuminuria and blood pressure were measured. Hyperfiltration was evaluated by comparison of creatinine clearance before and after nephrectomy. Protein intake was evaluated by a nutritional questionnaire. Hyperfiltration was estimated as 38% and microalbuminuria was not different in patients submitted to nephrectomy (9.8 micrograms/min) compared to controls (9.7). Microalbuminuria post nephrectomy was not correlated to level of hyperfiltration, protein intake, age, blood pressure or time after surgery. These results suggest that the remaining kidney is able to double the excretion of albumin with a likely increase in glomerular filtration and intracapillary pressure.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Technique of laparoscopic nephrectomy in a patient with previous urinary diversion.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy is quickly becoming accepted as the standard treatment for small renal neoplasms and benign renal disease. The presence of an ileal conduit has been termed a relative contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. A 58-year old female presented with recurrent pyelonephritis and hydronephrosis of her left kidney. Surgical removal was necessary and we considered a transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for her. The patient had an ileal conduit and it was because of this reason that only after careful consideration was it decided to attempt the surgery using the laparoscopic approach. We present our technique of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in this patient with an ileal conduit and include technical suggestions that will help predict a successful outcome. The success of this case demonstrates that in certain circumstances, patients with urinary diversions can be offered laparoscopic nephrectomy and its benefits.

Female↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of ultrasonic tissue dissector and tissue glue for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a porcine model.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term tissue effects of ultrasonic dissector and cyanoacrylate glue during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a porcine model. Nine domestic pigs underwent laparoscopic left lower pole partial nephrectomy without vascular control. An ultrasonic tissue dissector was used to assist in the parenchymal incision, and the raw surfaces of the kidneys, including the exposed urinary system, were sealed with cyanoacrylate glue. No internal stents or additional sutures were placed. Intraoperative hemorrhages and urinary extravasation were recorded. The animals were humanely killed 28 days after undergoing the operations. The long-term effects of ultrasonic dissector and cyanoacrylate glue on the healing process of urothelium and renal parenchyma were determined histologically. All pigs survived the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and the blood loss ranged from 0 to 120 ml (mean, 60 ml). The average operative time was 89 +/- 10 min. The severity of the bleeding was minimal in six animals and moderate in three animals. No urinary extravasation was found using intravenous urography at the 28th postoperative day. No urinary fistula or renal abscess formation was found histologically. Cyanoacrylate glue infiltrated into the tissue defects and did not dissolve. The glue was encased by fibrotic tissue with minimal foreign body inflammatory reaction. Ultrasonic dissector was effective in achieving hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without the need of vascular control in pigs. Cyanoacrylate glue achieved good long-term adhesive power. The sealing effects provided by cyanoacrylate glue were adequate to prevent urinary extravasation from urothelial defects at least for 1 month.

Animals↗

PubMed1977

Blood pressure and water and electrolyte intake and excretion in rats (Brattleboro strain) after unilateral nephrectomy.

Using Brattleboro rats with and without hereditary diabetes insipidus (DI, non-DI), blood pressure, water intake and the excretion of water, sodium, potassium and osmotically active substances were measured in intact individuals and in animals subjected to unilateral nephrectomy at the age of 23 or 80 days. The development of blood pressure (BP) changes, determined in unilaterally nephrectomized animals at the age of 4--6 months, depended on the age at which the kidney was removed. After nephrectomy at the age of 25 days, hypertension developed only in DI females given 0.6% NaCl solution to drink. The BP of those which drank water was unaffected. Unilateral nephrectomy at the age of 80 days produced a slight BP increase in females irrespective of whether they drank water or 0.6% NaCl, but in males only if they drank 0.6% NaCl solution. No hypertension was observed in intact animals. No relationship was found between water intake and the blood pressure level. The BP increase in water-drinking females uninephrectomized at 80 days was accompanied by a raised urine flow and raised excretion of osmotically active substances. Sodium losses in DI animals were greater than in non-DI animals and the urinary sodium concentration, in maximum dehydration, attained minimum values in DI and maximum values in non-DI animals. Unilateral nephrectomy at 25 days increased sodium losses in all the animals except non-DI females, but when performed at 80 days, only in DI males. No relationship between these results and BP changes was found. The possible relationship of the extrarenal consequences of absence of vasopressin to the development of experimental hypertension are discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

[Pneumothorax during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: a case report].

A 54-year-old female patient was scheduled for retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with nitrous oxide/sevoflurane and epidural anesthesia. One hour after the start of the surgery, arterial oxygen saturation suddenly decreased from 99% to 94%. Because her oxygenation gradually improved and hemodynamics was stable, the operation was continued. After the end of the surgery, left pneumothorax was found on a chest X ray. The patient was extubated following thoracocentesis that had improved her pneumothorax and oxygenation. There is no report of pneumothorax in retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, as far as we know, although several cases have been reported in laparoscopic nephrectomy. We must be careful of pneumothorax in both laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic nephrectomy: an early experience at Queen Mary Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To report our early experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy. DESIGN: Prospective data collection. SETTING: Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed on 40 patients between July 1997 and December 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and perioperative data including operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain score, analgesic requirement, complications, time to resume oral intake, ambulatory state, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed for 21 solid renal masses, five transitional cell carcinomas, and 14 non-functioning kidneys. Seven (17.5%) patients had previous abdominal surgery. The mean body mass index of the patients was 23.9 kg/m(2) and the mean operating time was 229 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 370 mL, and two patients required conversion to open surgery because of intra-operative bleeding. Other complications include diaphragmatic injury, port-site bleeding, chyle leakage, bleeding peptic ulcer, and myocardial ischaemia. The postoperative mean analgesic requirement was 26 mg of morphine sulphate equivalent. The mean time for patients to resume oral diet and full ambulation was 1.3 and 2.8 days, respectively, and the mean length of hospital stay was 6.7 days. The mean diameter of the solid renal tumour was 4.1 cm and the surgical margins of all resected specimen for malignant tumours were negative. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a safe and efficacious approach for resection of benign non-functioning kidneys and malignant renal tumours.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗