SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Transfusion”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Allogenic blood transfusion in the first 24 hours after trauma is associated with increased systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and death.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented that blood transfusion incites a substantial inflammatory response with the systemic release of cytokines. Furthermore, blood transfusion is a significant independent predictor of multiple organ failure in trauma. The objective of this study was to assess the risk of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay (LOS), and mortality in trauma patients who require blood transfusion. METHODS: Prospective data were collected on 9,539 trauma patients admitted to the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center over a 30-month period from January, 1997 to July, 1999. Complete SIRS data were available on 7,602 patients. Patients were stratified by age, gender, race, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and injury severity score (ISS). A systemic inflammatory response to a wide variety of severe clinical insults (SIRS) was defined as a SIRS score of > or =2, as calculated on admission. Blood transfusion was assessed as an independent predictor of SIRS, ICU admission and length of stay, and mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 37 +/- 17 years; the mean ISS was 9 +/- 9 points. Seventy-one percent of the patients were male, and 85% sustained blunt trauma. Blood transfusion within the first 24 h was administered to 954 patients, comprising 10% of the study cohort. Transfused patients were significantly older (43 +/- 20 vs. 36 +/- 16 years, p < 0.00001), had higher ISS (22 +/- 12 vs. 8 +/- 7 points, p < 0.00001), and lower GCS (12 +/- 4 vs. 14 +/- 2 points, p < 0.00001) than non-transfused patients. Blood transfusion and increased total volume of blood transfusion was associated with SIRS. Blood transfusion was also a significant independent predictor of SIRS, ICU admission, and mortality in trauma patients by multinomial logistic regression analysis. Trauma patients who received blood transfusion had a two- to nearly sixfold increase in SIRS (p < 0.0001) and more than a fourfold increase in ICU admission (OR 4.62, 95% CI 3.84-5.55, p < 0.0001) and mortality (OR 4.23, 95% CI 3.07-5.84, p < 0.0001) compared to those that were not transfused. Linear regression analysis revealed that transfusion was an independent predictor of ICU LOS (Coef. 5.20, SE 0.43, p < 0.0001). Transfused patients had significantly longer ICU LOS (16.8 +/- 14.9 vs. 9.9 +/- 10.6 days, p < 0.00001) and hospital LOS (14.5 +/- 15.5 vs. 2.5 +/- 5.3 days, p < 0.00001) compared to non-transfused patients. CONCLUSIONS: Blood transfusion within the first 24 h was an independent predictor of mortality, SIRS, ICU admission, and ICU LOS in trauma patients. The use of blood substitutes and alternative agents to increase serum hemoglobin concentration in the post-injury period warrants further investigation.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Prognostic significance of perioperative blood transfusions in resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The perioperative blood transfusions have been associated with tumor recurrence and decreased survival in various types of alimentary tract cancer. There exist, however, contradictory studies showing no relationship between blood transfusions and survival. For patients with esophageal cancer, only one report suggested that blood transfusions did not by itself decrease the chance of cure after esophagectomy. METHODS: Among 235 patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus between December 1979 and March 1998, 143 patients (60.9%) underwent esophagectomy with curative intent (RO). To exclude the effects of surgery-related postoperative complications, 14 patients who died within 90 days during the hospital stay were excluded. Thus, clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors were retrospectively investigated between patients with no or few transfusions (< or = 2 units) (n = 58), and much transfused patients (> or = 3 units) (n = 71). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients are alive and free of cancer, and 66 patients are dead. A total of 98 patients (76%) received blood transfusions, whereas 31 patients (24%) had no transfusion. The amount of blood transfused was 1 or 2 units in 27 patients (27.6%), 3 or 4 units in 33 (33.7%), 5 or 6 units in 20 (20.4%), and > or = 7 units in 18 (18.4%). The 5-yr survival rate for patients with no or few transfusions was 69%, whereas that for much transfused patients was 31.7% (p < 0.0001). The much transfused patients had more prominent ulcerative tumor, longer time of operation, more estimated blood loss, and more marked blood vessel invasion than the group with no or few transfusions. The factors influencing survival rate were tumor location, Borrmann classification, size of tumor, depth of invasion, number of lymph node metastases, time of operation, amount of blood transfusions, lymph vessel invasion, and blood vessel invasion. Among those nine significant variables verified by univariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for survival determined by multivariate analysis were number of lymph node metastasis (0 or 1 vs > or = 2, p < 0.0001), amount of blood transfusions (< or = 2 units vs > or = 3 units, p < 0.0001), and blood vessel invasion (marked vs non-marked, p = 0.0207). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between high amount of blood transfusions and decreased survival for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. To improve the prognosis, surgeons must be careful to reduce blood loss during esophagectomy with extensive lymph node dissection and subsequently must minimize blood transfusions.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Are we overusing blood transfusing after elective joint replacement?--a simple method to reduce the use of a scarce resource.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patients who received a blood transfusion after joint replacement, and to devise a simple method to ensure patients were transfused based on strict clinical and haematological need. DESIGN: Prospective audit over 2 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group was 151 patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasty in a typical district general hospital (Kettering) over a 2-year period. They were divided into three consecutive groups. Current practice was audited (producing the first group of 62 patients) and transfusion rates were compared to regional figures. Local guidelines were drawn up. A form was introduced on which the indications for any transfusion had to be documented prior to transfusion of the blood. This was designed to encourage transfusion only on strong clinical grounds or an haemoglobin (Hb) level < 8 g/dl. Transfusion practice was then re-audited (producing the second group of 44 patients) to assess whether practice had improved. A year later, all relevant staff were reminded by letter of the guidelines. The process was then re-audited (producing the third group of 45 patients) again to determine whether practice remained improved or not. RESULTS: In the first audit (current practice) of 62 patients, the overall transfusion rate was 71%, with a higher rate in the hip replacement group (84%) ordered mainly by anaesthetic staff. Ward staff were reluctant not to transfuse patients whose Hb level fell below 10 g/dl. In the second audit, the transfusion rate fell by nearly 50% to 37%, with almost identical figures for knee and hip replacement. In the third audit of 45 patients, a year later, the transfusion rate was 40% overall. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were being transfused routinely, generally without good clinical evidence of benefit to the patient. The audit process was successful in instituting change for the better in blood transfusion practice for elective joint replacement. The improved practice can be largely maintained provided staff are regularly reminded of appropriate guidelines and encouraged to transfuse for clinical need only. For absolute adherence to guidelines, we would recommend a compulsory form system be introduced for transfusion in the per-operative period, to ensure blood transfusion is only given when absolutely necessary.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

PubMed1992

[Prognostic incidence of blood transfusion in 753 patients operated for colorectal adenocarcinoma].

Do transfusions have a deleterious effect on the survival after surgery for colorectal carcinoma (CRC)? Among 1,221 patients operated on for a CRC between 1969 and 1988, 753 patients having undergone a curative surgical procedure with a follow-up of at least six months were evaluated retrospectively. 134 patients (17.2%) did not receive any transfusion; the others 619 (82.80%) received transfusions including 150 with packed red blood cells only. Transfused and non transfused patients were compared. Among the classical indicators for disease free survival, the only valuable parameter was the pathological classification, but it was not discriminant between transfused and non transfused patients. Prognostic value of transfusions were evaluated with regard of the components and the quantity of transfused items, the time of transfusions (either per- or perioperative), the surgical procedures and the tumor location on colon and rectum. The 5 years survival of transfused patients was less than for non transfused patients (56.3% versus 61.7%, p > 0.05 NS), but only the transfusions of more than 5 packed red blood cells worsened significantly the prognostic. (5 years chi 2 = 5.7; p < 0.02). Adjustments with pathologic analysis and time evolutive indications for transfusions did not alter those results. These results point the fact that transfusions could influence survival after surgery for CRC and stress us to limit reasonably transfusions.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1987

The transfusion effect.

1. Pretransplant blood transfusions improved the survival of first cadaver donor renal allografts by 10% at one year in CsA-treated recipients. 2. Pretransplant transfusions improved the survival of living-related donor transplants as well. HLA-identical sibling grafts had a 5% higher graft survival rate in transfused than nontransfused patients. Living-related donor transplants in one haplotype-mismatched combinations had a 10% higher one-year graft survival rate in transfused recipients. One-year graft survival in nontransfused recipients of one haplotype-mismatched sibling transplants was 75%, a result slightly lower than that for CsA-treated first cadaver donor recipients. 3. Transfusions given prior to retransplantation did not improve survival of the second graft. As patients who have previously rejected a transplant are at high risk of sensitization, blood transfusions should be avoided if possible. 4. For black recipients, transfusions improved one-year cadaver graft outcome by 17%. The effect was smaller in white recipients (8%), but significant nevertheless. One-year graft survival was 55% in nontransfused blacks and 68% in nontransfused whites. The impact of recipient race on the transfusion effect may explain some of the discrepancies between the UCLA and European registries on the magnitude of the transfusion effect. 5. Even centers with high overall success rates with cadaver donor transplants had poor graft survival in nontransfused recipients. The transfusion effect cannot be explained simply as a reflection of center performance. 6. The number of transfusions required to see an improvement in graft survival was small. Even a single transfusion significantly improved graft outcome in male and nulliparous female recipients. Since the risk of sensitization increased with multiple transfusions, large numbers of unnecessary transfusions should be avoided. 7. There may be alternatives to transfusion for those patients unwilling or unable to accept blood products and for patients at high risk of sensitization (parous females) as a result of transfusion. HLA matching resulted in high survival rates among nontransfused recipients.

Blood Transfusion↗

PubMed1988

The transfusion effect.

1. There was a "transfusion effect" for cadaver kidney transplant recipients and the improvement of 1-year graft survival with transfusions was 7.1% (p0.0002) in 1987. 2. Two or 3 pretransplant transfusions are sufficient to obtain the maximum transfusion effect. 3. In 1988, about a quarter of the patients received first cadaver kidney transplants without any pretransplant transfusions, whereas only 10% were nontransfused during the period between 1981 and 1984. 4. The transfusion effect diminished as patients aged. The increase in 1-year graft survival with transfusions was 17% in patients aged 16-25, 4% in patients aged 46-55, and 1% in patients over 55. 5. Both transfused and nontransfused patients had as high as 83% 1-year graft survival rates when they received 0 A, B, DR-mismatched kidneys. Transfusions improved graft survival by as much as 8% for recipients with mismatched grafts. 6. There was no transfusion effect in recipients of 0 DR-mismatched kidney transplants. Transfusions improved the 1-year graft survival rate by 8-10% for transplant recipients with 1 or 2 DR-mismatched kidneys. 7. The transfusion effect was greater in black (8%) than white (4%) recipients; however, the 77% 1-year graft survival rate for transfused black recipients of 0 DR-mismatched kidneys did not differ from that of transfused whites. 8. Considering the transfusion effect on graft failure rather than graft survival, the failure rate in nontransfused patients could have been reduced by 30% in transplants performed between 1976 and 1979, 17% in transplants from 1980 through 1983, and 21% in transplants since 1984 with blood transfusions.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

[Transfusion strategy in programmed hemorrhagic orthopedic surgery].

OBJECTIVES: Prospectively assess autologous blood transfusion for programmed orthopedic procedures. METHODS: From January 1 to December 31 1993, 307 patients underwent programmed orthopedic procedures: total hip replacement (n = 191), total knee replacement (n = 83) and osteotomy (n = 33). General (94%) or spinal anesthesia (6%) was used. The anesthesist explained transfusion techniques and patients gave informed consent for inclusion in an autologous transfusion protocol including differed autologous transfusion, intentional normovolemic hemodilution and intraoperative transfusion of shed blood. RESULTS: A total of 269 autologous transfusion were performed among the 307 patients (87.6%). This was sufficient in 242 cases (78.8%) and in 65 (21.2%) homologous transfusion was required. Among the 269 patients given autologous transfusion, differed transfusion was used in 145 (53.9%), intentional normovolemic hemodilution in 124 (46%) and intraoperative transfusion of shed blood in 222 (82.5%). Among the patients given a differed autologous transfusion, 9 (6.2%) required a homologous transfusion and among the 40 patients in which all 3 techniques were used, only 2 (5%) received homologous blood, both due to secondary complications. CONCLUSION: These findings show that when differed autologous transfusion is included in the transfusion strategy, less than 10% of the patients require homologous blood. In addition, when the 3 autologous transfusion techniques are used, the rate of homologous blood transfusion approaches zero.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Transfusion predictors in liver transplant.

UNLABELLED: In this study we sought to determine the factors influencing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and to study the transfusion practice of anesthesiologists during liver transplants. A retrospective study of 206 successive liver transplants was undertaken during a period of 52 mo. Transfused blood products were identified. Twenty variables were analyzed in a univariate fashion. For the multivariate analysis, the cases were divided in 2 subgroups: more than 4 RBC units transfused and 4 or less RBC units transfused. The average number of RBC units transfused during a liver transplant was 2.8 (+/- 3.5) per patient, 32.0% did not receive any RBC, and 19.4% did not receive any blood products during the transplant. Three variables were related to the number of RBC units transfused: the starting International Normalized Ratio value, the starting platelet count, and the duration of surgery. We found that there was a wide difference in the transfusion practice of the anesthesiologists involved in this series of liver transplants. It was difficult to identify predictive factors for RBC transfusions when the transfusion rate was small and because of the variability in human factors. Plasma transfusion did not decrease the rate of RBC transfusions; sometimes it was the contrary. IMPLICATIONS: This is a retrospective study of 206 liver transplants over 52 mo to identify the predictive factors of red blood cell transfusions and the anesthesiologists' transfusion strategies. We conclude that there is a wide difference in transfusion practices among anesthesiologists.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Blood transfusions for severe malaria-related anemia in Africa: a decision analysis.

Severe childhood malarial anemia is commonly treated using blood transfusion. Although transfusion may decrease short-term mortality, the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is considerable in Africa. We constructed a decision tree to weigh the short-term mortality benefit of transfusion against HIV infection risk. Probability estimates were derived from published studies. The base-case was a two-year-old child with a 13.5% mortality risk to be transfused with screened or unscreened blood (1% or 13% HIV contamination risk, respectively), with reduction of mortality to 5.5% by transfusion (odds ratio=2.7), and a 2.4% risk of fatal transfusion complications. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the influence of variation in these estimates. If a child developed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, survival was weighed as one-tenth of normal survival. For the base-case, we found that transfusion with screened blood provided a survival benefit of 5%. In contrast, transfusion with unscreened blood decreased survival by 2%. Patients with a mortality risk < 5% derived no benefit from a transfusion with screened blood. Other important factors for the benefit of transfusion were the effectiveness of transfusion in reducing mortality and the risk of blood contamination. A blood transfusion was clearly beneficial if the mortality risk was high and the risk of contamination was low. Our findings can be used as a basis for a clinical transfusion policy that limits transfusions to situations in which they are likely to be beneficial. This will in turn optimize child survival and prevent unnecessary exposure of low risk children to the transfusion risks.

Africa↗

PubMed2003

[Reports of transfusion incidents: experiences from the first year of hemovigilance in the region of the former ZWN (South West Netherlands) blood bank in Rotterdam].

OBJECTIVE: Itemize blood transfusion incidents in the South-West Netherlands region (about 3.5 million inhabitants), where a regional reporting system for transfusion incidents was introduced in January 2001. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive. METHOD: In the period 1 January 2001-31 December 2001, 22 hospitals voluntarily reported transfusion incidents in patients to the blood bank. All incidents were anonymously recorded in a standardised report and registered in 14 categories. RESULTS: A total of 119 transfusion incidents were reported and categorised as: incorrect blood component transfused (n = 8), mild fever 1-2 degrees C (n = 14), non-haemolytic fever > 2 degrees C (n = 36), acute haemolytic transfusion reactions (n = 3). delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions (n = 18), allergic reactions (n = 11), bacterial contamination (n = 3), transfusion-related acute lung injury (n = 1), near accidents (n = 6) and product recalls (n = 19). There were no reports in the categories anaphylactic shock, post-transfusion purpura, transfusion-acquired viral infection, and transfusion-related graft versus host disease. In the same year of haemovigilance, the blood bank issued a total of 158,000 blood products. A complication rate of 1:700 blood products was calculated. It is estimated that 53% of all incidents were reported. CONCLUSION: Despite all of the safety measures taken, severe adverse events still occurred. A well-run system for haemovigilance can contribute to the knowledge of transfusion incidents. The safety and quality of blood transfusions can be improved if this knowledge is incorporated into ongoing education about blood transfusions and in the prevention and treatment of transfusion reactions.

Blood Banks↗

PubMed2006

[Blood transfusion and consultation].

Many hospital staff, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, etc., are engaged in blood transfusion practice, and various inquiries are referred to the blood transfusion services. In order to provide a prompt and proper reply, transfusionists must have a wealth of knowledge and experience concerning blood transfusion medicine. Q & A relating to blood transfusion can be found on the home page of the Japanese Society of Blood Transfusion, and these are useful staff resources to obtain simple information. However, we sometimes encounter difficult problems in the management of a patient's treatment. Three representative transfusion-related issues are described in this article: (1) blood transfusion to patients with a positive DAT; (2) emergency transfusion, especially in cases where unexpected antibodies are encountered; (3) management of platelet transfusion refractoriness. Minimum standards for the investigation of transfusion-related adverse reactions developed by SHOT (Serious Hazards of Transfusion) are also introduced in this article, and these have a highly practical value. Finally, the importance of education in transfusion medicine is described. The number of doctors in Japan who are engaged exclusively in transfusion medicine is small, but blood transfusions are performed in every hospital, regardless of whether such a specialist is present. We have recently had to deal with a wide range of transplantation-related issues. Therefore, there is a great need for special education in transfusion medicine for doctors in the transplantation and cell therapy age.

Blood Transfusion↗

PubMed1989

The transfusion effect.

1. Many transplant centers have apparently abandoned their deliberate transfusion protocols believing that the beneficial effect of transfusions no longer outweighs the risks. 2. Pretransplant blood transfusions have consistently improved graft survival among recipients of first cadaver donor transplants. One-year graft survival rates were 5-8% higher for transfused patients transplanted each year between 1982 and 1987. Transplants performed in 1988 and 1989 showed a 3% improvement with transfusions. 3. Whereas large numbers of transfusions resulted in higher 1-year graft survival rates in the precyclosporine era, 2 or 3 transfusions provided the maximum effect in more recent transplants. 4. A disturbing decrease in the long-term survival of transplants to nontransfused patients and patients given 1-4 transfusions has been noted. Nontransfused recipients transplanted since 1985 had a higher loss rate after the first year than those transplanted prior to 1982. If this trend can be verified as more follow-up becomes available, it suggests that the transfusion effect has become a factor in long-term survival rather than one that affects only the immediate posttransplant period. 5. Transfusions decreased the risk and apparent severity of early rejection episodes. Twenty-six percent of transfused patients had early rejection and 1-year graft survival was 67%. Among nontransfused patients, rejections occurred in 42% and survival was 56%. Patients with no early graft dysfunction had 89% 1-year graft survival when transfused and 83% when not transfused. 6. Transfusions improved 1-year graft survival by 7% for Asian recipients, 6% for Blacks, and 4% for Whites. The improvement within each racial group was significant. 7. Kidneys that were mismatched for HLA-DR antigens and kidneys from donors younger than age 16 had significantly poorer survival when transplanted to nontransfused patients. Transfusions mitigated the effects of mismatching and donor age on 1-year graft survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Introduction of a donor exposure reduction programme for multiple-transfused very-low-birth-weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an audit of the frequency of red cell concentrate transfusions (RCCTs) in infants of different weight categories, the donor exposure rate (DER), in these transfused infants and the volume of blood wasted during each transfusion, and to identify from this baseline information specific categories of infants who would benefit from the introduction of a limited donor exposure programme (LDEP). STUDY SETTING: Neonatal wards and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Tygerberg Hospital, Western Cape. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective descriptive study and comparison with a historic control group. SUBJECTS: Information on the birth weight, age at the time of each RCCT and number of blood donors to whom an infant was exposed were collected post factum for all infants admitted to the neonatal wards and NICU between May 1993 and May 1994. During this time, the red blood cell concentrate was supplied as single paediatric bags (180 ml) transfused within 14 days of donation. An LDEP was introduced in February 1995. With this system, red blood cells were supplied as triple packs: a main unit of 250 ml with three empty satellite packs allowing up to three separate transfusions. These were assigned to a specific infant and were to be transfused within 21 days of donation. A second system where one adult blood bag was divided into two 180 ml bags and assigned to one infant to be transfused within 35 days of donation was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 7854 infants admitted during the first 12-month audit period, 387 (4.9%) received 977 RCCTs. Of these, 183 (47.3%) received one transfusion, 72 (18.6%) two transfusions, 51 (13.2%) three transfusions, 27 (7.0%) four transfusions and 54 (13.9%) five or more transfusions. Infants (N = 188) with a birth weight below 1500 g admitted to the NICU were identified as the group with the highest prevalence of RCCTs (68.6%), and it was therefore decided that in the prospective study such infants would qualify for the LDEP. A total of 81 infants was transfused with either the double (N = 47) or the triple bags (N = 34) over a 5-month period. The decrease in the mean DER (+/-SD) was clinically significant when the triple (1.9 +/- 0.8) (P = 0.0001) and the double bags (1.6 +/- 0.8) (P = 0.0001) were compared with the previous single-bag system (4.4 +/- 3.5). Of concern was the large mean volume of concentrated red cells (118.5 +/- 12.5 ml) wasted per transfusion with the single-bag system. CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirmed a high RCCT rate as well as a very high DER in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants treated at a tertiary centre. By assigning a triple or double bag of red cells from one blood donor and extending the storage of blood for small-volume RCCTs in infants from 14 days to 35 days, donor exposure was reduced significantly. We urge the introduction of the multibag blood transfusion system and extended storage period of blood for small-volume RCCT for VLBW infants in South Africa.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

[Adequacy of blood component transfusion according to previously established criteria].

PURPOSE: Transfusion is not devoid of adverse effects; therefore every transfusional procedure must be indicated correctly. With this in mind in 1991 transfusion guidelines were published by our Hospital Transfusion Committee. Four years later, a retrospective audit was performed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have evaluated all blood component orders (order is a transfusion request) during one month, classifying them as appropriate or inappropriate according to the transfusion guidelines. The evaluation was performed 24 hours after transfusion. The results obtained were compared with the ones obtained before the published transfusion guidelines. RESULTS: 481 transfusion orders were studied. 87 percent (420/481) were considered appropriate according to the transfusion guidelines. These 481 orders referred to the transfusion of 1178 units to 293 patients. 12 percent of the transfused units was considered as inappropriate. 16 percent of the patients (48/239) had at least on inappropriate transfusion procedure. The comparison with the data obtained in 1991 showed a significant increase of the appropriate transfusion orders (74 versus 87 percent). The use of fresh frozen plasma showed the greatest incidence in inappropriate use, mainly in haemorrhagic disorders without factor deficit. The patients with haemoglobin levels between 70 and 100 g/L without signs of hypoxia were the most important cause of inappropriate use of red cell concentrates. And the patients with platelet levels > 20 x 10(9)/L were the major cause of inappropriate use of platelet concentrates. CONCLUSION: Transfusion guidelines knowledge improves the use of blood components.

Anemia↗

PubMed2004

Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

CONTEXT: It is unclear if blood transfusion in anemic patients with acute coronary syndromes is associated with improved survival. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between blood transfusion and mortality among patients with acute coronary syndromes who develop bleeding, anemia, or both during their hospital course. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We analyzed 24,112 enrollees in 3 large international trials of patients with acute coronary syndromes (the GUSTO IIb, PURSUIT, and PARAGON B trials). Patients were grouped according to whether they received a blood transfusion during the hospitalization. The association between transfusion and outcome was assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling that incorporated transfusion as a time-dependent covariate and the propensity to receive blood, and a landmark analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thirty-day mortality. RESULTS: Of the patients included, 2401 (10.0%) underwent at least 1 blood transfusion during their hospitalization. Patients who underwent transfusion were older and had more comorbid illness at presentation and also had a significantly higher unadjusted rate of 30-day death (8.00% vs 3.08%; P<.001), myocardial infarction (MI) (25.16% vs 8.16%; P<.001), and death/MI (29.24% vs 10.02%; P<.001) compared with patients who did not undergo transfusion. Using Cox proportional hazards modeling that incorporated transfusion as a time-dependent covariate, transfusion was associated with an increased hazard for 30-day death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.26-4.75) and 30-day death/MI (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.55-3.35). In the landmark analysis that included procedures and bleeding events, transfusion was associated with a trend toward increased mortality. The predicted probability of 30-day death was higher with transfusion at nadir hematocrit values above 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Blood transfusion in the setting of acute coronary syndromes is associated with higher mortality, and this relationship persists after adjustment for other predictive factors and timing of events. Given the limitations of post hoc analysis of clinical trials data, a randomized trial of transfusion strategies is warranted to resolve the disparity in results between our study and other observational studies. We suggest caution regarding the routine use of blood transfusion to maintain arbitrary hematocrit levels in stable patients with ischemic heart disease.

Aged↗

PubMed1987

Blood transfusion and recurrence of cancer of the colon and rectum.

Clinical and experimental studies indicate that transfusion of allogeneic blood has immunomodulating properties, and that the behaviour of some tumours may be influenced by the immune system of the host. Eighty-seven patients who had undergone 'curative' resection of cancer of the colon or rectum were studied retrospectively to determine whether blood transfusion adversely affected the rate of cancer recurrence. Fifty-three patients (61 per cent) were transfused and 34 were not. The transfused and non-transfused groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, duration of follow-up, mode of presentation, stage of disease and haemoglobin level at discharge from hospital, and differed in admission haemoglobin and distribution of tumour locations (right- or left-sided colonic or rectal tumours). Recurrent malignancy was detected in 36 per cent of transfused patients and 26 per cent of non-transfused patients (P greater than 0.1). There was no association between the number of transfusions and recurrence for any tumour site or stage. The incidence of recurrence was significantly higher in those patients who received transfusions during surgery than in those who received transfusion either before or after surgery (chi 2 = 7.01, d.f. = 1, P less than 0.01) or no transfusions (chi 2 = 4.23, d.f. = 1, P less than 0.05). The study indicates that factors influencing the need for blood transfusion during operation had a greater bearing on prognosis than receipt of a blood transfusion per se and that future prospective studies investigating the association between transfusion and cancer recurrence need to determine accurately the indications for transfusion.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Do cardiac output and serum lactate levels indicate blood transfusion requirements in anemia of prematurity?

BACKGROUND: Whether and when to transfuse in anemia of prematurity is highly controversial. Some authors suggest transfusions simply if the hemoglobin (Hb) level is below a defined normal range. Others propose the use of clinical or laboratory parameters in anemic patients to decide whether to transfuse or not. HYPOTHESIS: A decreasing amount of circulating Hb should cause a compensatory increase in cardiac output (CO) and an increase in arterial serum lactate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 56 anemic preterm infants (not in respiratory or hemodynamic failure) we analyzed CO after the first week of life using a Doppler sonographic method. At the same time serum lactate levels, Hb levels and oxygen saturation were registered. Nineteen of these patients were given transfusion when they demonstrated clinical signs of anemia by tachycardia > 180/min, tachypnea, retractions, apneas and centralization (group 2). The remaining 37 patients were not transfused (group 1). Serum lactate, CO, heart rate (HR), oxygen delivery, respiratory rate, capillary refill and Hb were analyzed in both groups and in group 2 before and 12-24 h after transfusion. Data between groups 1 and 2 and in group 2 before and after transfusion were compared. RESULTS: In the 56 patients studied no linear correlation between Hb and CO or between Hb and serum lactate was found. Nor could any correlation be demonstrated between the other variables studied. Examining the subgroups separately, a negative linear correlation was demonstrated between serum lactate and oxygen delivery in group 2. No other significant correlations were detected. However, when the pre- and post-transfusion data were compared in group 2 (increase of Hb from 9.45 (SD 3.44) to 12.5 (SD 3.8) g/100 ml), the CO decreased from 281.3 (SD 162.6) to 224 (SD 95.7) ml/kg per min (p < 0.01) and serum lactate decreased significantly from 3.23 mmol/l (SD 2.07) before to 1.71 (SD 0.83) after transfusion. Oxygen delivery was 35.8 (+/- 0.19) ml/kg per min group 1, 27.8 (+/- 0.05) pre- and 43.4 (+/- 0.07) post-transfusion in group 2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CO measurements and serum lactate levels add little information to the decision-making process for blood transfusions, as neither CO nor serum lactate levels correlate with HB levels in an otherwise asymptomatic population of preterm infants. In infants where the indication for blood transfusion is made based on traditionally accepted clinical criteria, serum lactate is an additional laboratory indicator of impaired oxygenation, as it correlates significantly with oxygen delivery. A significant lower oxygen delivery in patients in whom blood transfusion is indicated and an increase in oxygen induced by transfusion demonstrate the value of these criteria in identifying preterm infants who benefit from transfusion.

Anemia, Neonatal↗

PubMed2005

The implications of blood transfusions for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: In a large contemporary population of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS), we sought to describe blood transfusion rates (overall and in patients who did not undergo coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]), patient characteristics and practices associated with transfusion, variation among hospitals, and in-hospital outcomes in patients receiving transfusions. BACKGROUND: The use of antithrombotic agents and invasive procedures reduces ischemic complications but increases risks for bleeding and need for blood transfusion in patients with NSTE ACS. METHODS: We evaluated patient characteristics and transfusion rates in the overall population (n = 85,111) and determined outcomes and factors associated with need for transfusion in a subpopulation of patients who did not undergo CABG (n = 74,271) from 478 U.S. hospitals between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2004. RESULTS: A total of 14.9% of the overall and 10.3% of the non-CABG population underwent transfusion during their hospitalization. Renal insufficiency and advanced age were strongly associated with the likelihood of transfusion. Interhospital transfusion rates varied significantly. Non-CABG patients who received transfusions had a greater risk of death (11.5% vs. 3.8%) and death or reinfarction (13.4% vs. 5.8%) than patients who did not undergo transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion is common in the setting of NSTE ACS, and patients who undergo transfusion are sicker at baseline and experience a higher risk of adverse outcomes than their nontransfused counterparts. Given the wide variation in transfusion practice, further efforts to understand patient and process factors that result in bleeding and need for transfusion in NSTE ACS are needed.

Acute Disease↗