SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “construct validity”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients.

OBJECTIVE: To modify an existing outcome measure (Bournemouth Questionnaire [BQ]) for use in patients with nonspecific neck pain and test its psychometric properties. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study in which the questionnaire was administered on 3 occasions (pretreatment, retest, and posttreatment). SETTING: Anglo-European College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic and 8 field chiropractic practices. METHOD: Seven core items relating to the biopsychosocial model of pain were included in the original questionnaire (back BQ). The wording of one of these items (disability in activities of daily living) was modified to include activities likely to be affected by neck pain. Testing of the neck BQ was carried out in 102 patients with nonspecific neck pain. RESULTS: The instrument demonstrated high internal consistency on 3 administrations (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87, 0.91, 0.92). All 7 items were retained on the basis that they each significantly contributed to the total score (item-corrected total score correlations >0.43) and to the instrument's responsiveness to clinical change (item change-corrected total change score correlations >0.42). The instrument was reliable in test-retest administrations in stable subjects (ICC = 0.65). The instrument demonstrated acceptable construct validity and longitudinal construct validity with established external measures. The treatment effect size of the instrument was found to be high (1.67). CONCLUSION: The neck BQ covers the salient dimensions of the biopsychosocial model of pain, is quick and easy to complete, and has been shown to be reliable, valid, and responsive to clinically significant change in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Its use as an outcome measure in clinical trials and outcomes research is recommended.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2003

Development and testing of the Role-related Meaning Scale for Staff in Pediatric Oncology.

The purpose of this study was to develop and test the Role-Related Meaning Scale for Staff in Pediatric Oncology (RRMS) to determine the internal consistency and the content and construct validity of this two-phase instrument. During phase 1 (item generation, content validation, and initial field testing), 23 nurses from two cancer centers participated, and during phase 2 (instrument testing), 89 nurses from one pediatric research center participated. The nurses completed either the RRMS only (phase 1) or six instruments including the RRMS (phase 2) to assess the following research variables: role-related meaning, group cohesion, organizational commitment, work satisfaction, and intent to leave. The RRMS was revised after phase 1 because the results yielded a ceiling effect and three overlapping items. The Cronbach alpha for the phase 2 total RRMS was.83, and four of the five hypothesized relations were confirmed (P =.04). Therefore, the RRMS was concluded to be an internally consistent instrument that has content validity and beginning construct validity. Future studies will examine whether the RRMS adequately measures the change in meaning brought about by interventions designed to increase role-related meaning among nurses.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2005

Validation of a new lower-extremity motor coordination test.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a new lower-extremity motor coordination test, the Lower Extremity MOtor COordination Test (LEMOCOT). DESIGN: To test reliability, subjects with impairments in at least 1 lower extremity were evaluated twice by the same evaluator. To test construct validity, the LEMOCOT scores obtained from subjects who had had a stroke were correlated with physical, functional, cognitive, and perceptual tests. SETTING: Geriatric day hospital and functional intensive rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: In the reliability test, 29 people (mean age, 69.6y; range, 28-87y); in the construct validity, 144 people who recently had had a stroke. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In addition to the LEMOCOT, the following measures were used for construct validity: the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (motor function), Berg Balance Scale, 5-m walking test, 2-minute walking test, Functional Autonomy Measurement System, Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, and Motor-Free Visual Perceptual Test. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated that test-retest reliability is good (right-side ICC=.88; left-side ICC=.83). The construct validity of the LEMOCOT was demonstrated by obtaining high correlations with physical and functional tests ( r range, .62-.79; P <.001) and no correlations with cognitive ( r =.11, P =.20) or visual perceptual tests ( r =.15, P =.08) and by discriminating between subjects discharged to long-term care versus other living environments ( P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The LEMOCOT is a simple lower-extremity motor coordination test that showed good test-retest reliability and construct validity. It can be used in clinical and research settings, specifically with people who have had a stroke. Other studies should be carried out to confirm its psychometric properties.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Predicting mortality in adult burned patients: methodological aspects of the construction and validation of a composite ratio scale.

This article describes the methodology of construction and validation of a composite measurement scale (CMS) to predict the risk of death for burned patients, with severity of burn considered as a continuous phenomenon. Three large data sets of burned patients hospitalized in France were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to construct a prognostic model, based on age and initial evaluation of total body surface area burned. The resulting model appears to be a valid clinical tool for predicting the risk of death. In addition, the devised CMS has satisfactory content and construct validity and reliability, and provides a high measurement level (logistic ratio level). Moreover, its simplicity of use (the score is integer based) is appropriate for the daily activities of burn unit physicians, emergency medical technicians, and public health professionals.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Validation criteria for animal models of human mental disorders: learned helplessness as a paradigm case.

Three sets of criteria are proposed for assessing animal models of human mental disorders: predictive validity (performance in the test predicts performance in the condition being modelled), face validity (phenomenological similarity) and construct validity (theoretical rationale). The problems inherent in each of these validation procedures are discussed, and their application to the learned helplessness model of depression is examined. It is concluded that whilst the model has good predictive validity, important questions about face validity remain unanswered, and construct validity has not yet been established. The distinctions between animal models and some related experimental procedures are also discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

A self-efficacy scale for children and adolescents with asthma: construction and validation.

A self-efficacy scale for children and adolescents with asthma between 10 and 18 years of age is described. A scale of 38 items was constructed and administered to 60 children and adolescents. A factor analysis of the results yielded a scale consisting of 22 items which can be divided into three subscales: factor one (24.8% of variance) measured efficacy expectations concerning medical treatment, factor two (10.3% of variance) measured efficacy expectations concerning the environment, and factor three (6.7% of variance) measured efficacy concerning problem-solving skills. Confirmation of several predicted conceptual relationships between the self-efficacy measures and other measures (Personality Questionnaire, Coping, Anxiety, Knowledge, Optimism, and Shame) provided preliminary evidence of construct validity. Further research and clinical applications are discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2000

A goniometric glove for clinical hand assessment. Construction, calibration and validation.

The construction of a goniometric glove is described. Each of the sensors in the glove was calibrated over a custom built metal hand using blocks of known angles as angular references. The digital data output from each sensor of the glove were converted into angular displacements at each joint. The glove was validated for consistency of measurement and accuracy over a custom built metal jig and in the human hand. The accuracy of the glove was found to be within the limits of traditional goniometry. It is proposed that goniometric gloves could be useful in the assessment of hand function.

Calibration↗

PubMed1996

Quantified pain drawing in subacute low back pain. Validation in a nonselected outpatient industrial sample.

STUDY DESIGN: The criterion and construct validities of pain drawing, quantified by a simple total body area score of pain extent (area raw extent assessment score), were analyzed prospectively on consecutive patients (n = 103), drawn from a predefined blue collar worker population, all sick listed for 6 weeks as a result of low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of pain drawing as a screening tool in the secondary prevention of subacute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pain drawings have been used clinically for more than 40 years as a complement to a patient's verbal pain descriptions. The main objectives have been to differentiate functional pain from organic pain and to identify meaningful features in spatial-anatomic pain distribution. The ability of the pain drawing to delineate concurrent psychopathology correctly has been questioned. There is no consensus on which scoring method should be used. METHODS: The area raw extent assessment score was analyzed concurrently against the penalty point system and predictively against return to work and absenteeism over a period of 2 years. Content and construct validity assessed the relative influence of medical, psychologic, and subjective disability as well as psychosocial factors. RESULTS: Criterion validation of the area raw extent assessment score showed significant correlations, both concurrently against the penalty point score (r = 0.86, P < 0.001, with explained variance R2 = 0.75, P < 0.001) and predictively against occupational handicap (r = 0.48, P < 0.001). In construct validation, the highest explained variance was shown for medical (R2 = 0.46, P < 0.001) and psychologic factors (R2 = 0.46, P < 0.001) and psychologic factors (R2 = 0.34, P < 0.001) and for subjective disability (R2 = 0.32, P < 0.001). Variance in the area raw extent assessment score also was explained by psychosocial factors (R2 = 0.19, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pain drawing quantification of the extent of pain shows high criterion and construct validity for the area raw extent assessment score. Content validity could be shown for significant clinical aspects of the disability experience--assets preferred for a screening tool in secondary prevention.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Translation and validation of the danish version of the Bournemouth questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Danish version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ). METHODS: Translation/retranslation of the English version of the BQ was done blindly and independently by 4 different individuals and adapted by an expert team. The Danish version of the BQ was tested for face validity in a sample of low-back pain (LBP) patients attending 2 chiropractic clinics. Reproducibility was tested using 28 stable LBP patients attending a hospital outpatient back-pain clinic. Finally, the Danish version of the BQ was tested for external construct validity, external longitudinal construct validity, internal consistency, and sensitivity to change against the Danish versions of the SF-36 and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) using 118 first-time LBP patients reporting to 1 of 7 chiropractic clinics. RESULTS: Minor changes were made after the face-validity test. Intraclass correlation coefficient of the total score for the BQ based on the 2 administrations was 0.96. Satisfactory values for the external construct validity and the external longitudinal construct validity were found using both Pearson r and Bland-Altman plots. Cronbach alpha's were .89 and .88 for the pretreatment and posttreatment scores, respectively. The Danish version of the BQ showed greater responsiveness than the SF-36 and similar responsiveness when compared with the RMDQ. CONCLUSIONS: The BQ was successfully translated and culturally adapted into Danish. The BQ was successfully tested for validity, consistency, and responsiveness against the Danish version of the SF-36 and RMDQ.

Denmark↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Which are the best instruments for measuring disabilities in gait and gait-related activities in patients with rheumatic disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Our first objective was to make an inventory of available instruments for the assessment of disabilities in gait and related activities in patients with rheumatic disorders. Our second aim was to investigate which of these instruments have acceptable methodological quality with regard to reliability and validity. Our third aim was to investigate the assumption that the evaluation of convergent construct validity results in stronger correlations when validated against a more similar construct. MATERIALS: A computer-aided literature search (1982-2001) of several databases was performed to identify studies focusing on the clinimetric properties of instruments to assess impairments in function in patients with rheumatic disorders. Data on intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability and convergent construct validity were extracted in a standardized manner and compared to a priori defined criteria. RESULTS: In total 78 instruments were eligible. Intra-observer reliability was investigated for 28 instruments and only 7 demonstrated good reliability as well as good validity. Surprisingly, the convergent construct validation against a similar construct resulted often in lower correlations than validation against a less similar construct. CONCLUSION: Based on the available information, the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Scale and the Health Assessment Questionnaire seem to be the best instruments for assessing disabilities in gait and related activities in patients with rheumatic disorders.

Databases, Factual↗

PubMed2001

Cross-cultural validity and reliability testing of a standard psychiatric assessment instrument without a gold standard.

The objective of this study was to assess the cross-culture validity and reliability of a standard psychiatric assessment instrument without the usual "gold standards." Normally criterion validity testing requires comparison with such a standard--usually another instrument or a professional diagnosis. Instead local informants identified persons with and without "agahinda gakabije" (a locally described grief syndrome) who were then asked if they thought they had this syndrome and also interviewed using the depression section of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (DHSCL). To assess criterion validity, interviews where respondent and informant agreed on the presence or absence of agahinda gakabije were compared with depression diagnosis using the DHSCL. We also assessed construct validity (using factor analysis), internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha), and test-retest reliability using results from a subsequent community-based survey employing the DHSCL. We found a similar relationship between depression and agahinda gakabije as between depression and grief in western countries, which supports criterion validity. Construct validity and internal reliability were good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). Test-retest reliability of a DHSCL-based scale was less adequate (0.67). Although not replacing the usual gold standards for testing criterion validity, this approach may prove useful where these standards are unavailable. As this includes much of the developing world, this could result in more accurate mental health assessments among populations for whom this has hitherto not been possible.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The measure of Adolescent Heterosocial Competence: development and initial validation.

We developed and began construct validation of the Measure of Adolescent Heterosocial Competence (MAHC), a self-report instrument assessing the ability to negotiate effectively a range of challenging other-sex social interactions. Development followed the Goldfried and D'Zurilla (1969) behavioral-analytic model for assessing competence. Approximately 700 adolescents participated in 5 systematic studies. Studies 1 through 4 generated the MAHC item and response content, as well as the basis for response scoring. In the first 3 studies, extensive data were collected from the target population regarding problematic heterosocial situations and potential responses to those situations. In Study 4, expert jdudges rated the relative effectiveness of the adolescent-identified behavioral responses. In the final study, scale reliability and construct validity of the resulting 40-item multiple-choice self-report instrument were examined. Factor analysis yielded no interpretable factors, and the internal consistency of the total scale was acceptable (alpha =.73). Investigation of convergent and discriminant validity revealed that the MAHC was significantly related to measures of general social competence and anxiety in heterosexual situations and was not associated with a measure of socioeconomic status. Contrary to expectations, the MAHC was not correlated with peer ratings of social acceptance.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Assessment of the validity and reliability of the University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital Pain scale for Preverbal and Nonverbal Children.

PURPOSE: This study tested the reliability and validity of a pain scale that was developed at University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital for the preverbal child (less than 3 years old) and the nonverbal child (children who cognitively were not able to communicate a pain rating on traditional pain scales). METHOD: Content validity was established by expert review. Construct validity was demonstrated by having the nurse rate the child's pain before and after analgesic and during a procedure. Inter-rater reliability was achieved by two nurses simultaneously and independently rating the child's pain. Criterion validity was determined by comparing ratings with those obtained on the Wong-Baker Faces scale. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. FINDINGS: Seventy-four patients provided data for 124 observation times. At 58 of the observation times, two nurses independently used the newly developed University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital (UWCH) scale, resulting in 182 pain ratings. Internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.93. Mean pain scores were significantly higher prior to pain medication administration and during procedures than following analgesic administration. Inter-rater reliability was 0.92. Correlation of the new scale with the Wong-Baker Faces Scale was r = .62. CONCLUSIONS: Initial testing of the construct validity, internal reliability, and internal consistency of the UWCH Pain Scale for Preverbal and Nonverbal Children were acceptable. Parents provided ratings for most of the faces scale, which could account for the low correlation in the construct validity testing.

Child Behavior↗

PubMed2003

Development and initial validation of a measure of coordination of health care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and initial validation of the self-administered Client Perceptions of Coordination Questionnaire. DESIGN: The instrument was developed between 1996 and 1997 through iterative item generation; within a framework of six domains of coordination, addressed across four sectors of health care provision. SETTING: 1193 individuals with complex and chronic health care needs as judged by their general practitioners (GPs), who were participants in a 2-year randomized controlled trial of a coordinated care intervention in Australia. Other samples were collected in one general practice (98) and from attendees of a chronic pain management course (29). MAIN MEASURES: Face and content validity, completion rates, transferability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the 32-item instrument. RESULTS: Most items achieved excellent completion and comprehension rates. The instrument was transferable to another chronically unwell population. Cronbach's alpha of the entire instrument was 0.92, and for six individual scales scores ranged from 0.31 to 0.86. The six scales based on principal components analysis were acceptability, received care, GP, nominated provider, client comprehension, and client capacity. The first four scales were satisfactory, but the client scales were inadequate with poor internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity. People with chronic pain syndromes had significantly worse experiences for almost all items, supporting construct validity. CONCLUSION: This instrument is one of the first to attempt to measure coordination of health care. Its strengths include ease of completion, transferability, and promising psychometric properties and construct validity. Problems capturing data about the patient's contribution to coordination highlight a lack of theoretical development in this area. A valid measure of coordination should be useful in needs assessment, program evaluation, and individual provider/practice audit, and would contribute to research into the experience and measurement of patient-focused care.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Interexaminer reliability and clinical validity of the temporomandibular index: a new outcome measure for temporomandibular disorders.

AIMS: The operational definitions for the Craniomandibular Index (CMI) were redesigned to conform precisely to those of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), resulting in a single examination protocol, the Temporomandibular Index (TMI). The objectives were to evaluate interexaminer reliability of the TMI as well as its criteria and construct validity for measurement of TMD severity. METHODS: Interexaminer reliability of the TMI was assessed on 12 subjects. Criterion validity of the TMI was evaluated relative to the CMI, the latter having established validity. Construct validity of the TMI was evaluated for its capacity to differentiate TMD patients (n = 79) from normal subjects (n = 20) and to detect changes in severity over time. RESULTS: The examiner's average TMI scores were 0.27 +/- 0.19 (SD) and 0.26 +/- 0.20. Agreement was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.93. The scores for the TMI and the CMI correlated highly, with an ICC of 0.97. Statistical contrasts between the symptomatic groups and the normal subjects were highly significant (P < .001). In 20 TMD patients who underwent treatment for their disorder, their mean change of 0.12 from their pretreatment TMI scores was highly significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study has provided statistical evidence for the clinical reliability and validity of the TMI, which indicates that the RDC examination protocol is appropriate for determining TMD severity by the TMI algorithm, and diagnosis of TMD subtypes by the RDC algorithm.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Studies on a German (Münster) version of the temperament auto-questionnaire TEMPS-A: construction and validation of the briefTEMPS-M.

BACKGROUND: Based on classic German concepts of a continuum between depressive, hyperthymic, cyclothymic, and irritable temperaments and affective disorder (and adding an anxious type to the four), Akiskal and co-workers developed the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego both in interview (TEMPS-I) and auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A) versions. It is the aim of the present analyses to validate a brief German version of TEMPS-A. METHODS: A total of 1056 students of the Westfalische-Wilhelms-Universitat in Munster, Germany, filled out the long 110-item version of the TEMPS-A (Munster translation by Erfurth: TEMPS-M) modified into a five gradation Likert format and with the items randomized. Based on this data we constructed a brief version of the TEMPS-M. In a second study, a sample of 151 students were recruited who filled out the briefTEMPS-M twice, approximately 1 month apart. RESULTS: Our psychometric procedures resulted in the retention of 35 items from the original 110. The proposed five-factor structure of the original TEMPS-A was upheld, with relatively few item reclassification (mainly due to some overlap between depressive and anxious traits). Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha values ranging from 0.69 to 0.84) and test-retest reliability were shown. Most importantly, all temperaments in the briefTEMPS-M correlated quite well (Pearson r values ranging from 0.49 to 0.72) with their respective original versions in the longer TEMPS-M. As for construct validity, significant correlation was shown with the Beck Depression Inventory for all but the hyperthymic temperament; the hyperthymic, cyclothymic and irritable correlated highest with the self-report Manic Inventory. LIMITATIONS: The study sample of university students was selective. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to construct a brief German version of the TEMPS-A auto-questionnaire. We submit this shorter version will be suitable for both clinical (psychiatric and general medical) and neurobiological research, as well as in studies on temperament features in selected populations, e.g., allowing comparisons between regions or different (German-speaking) countries.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Validation of the Tunisian version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire.

Our aim was to validate a culturally adapted, Tunisian-language version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), which is a reliable evaluation instrument for low-back-pain disability. A total of 62 patients with low back pain were assessed by the questionnaire. Reliability for the 1-week test/re-test was assessed by a construction of a Bland Altman plot. Internal construct validity was assessed by Cronbach's alphatest. External construct validity was assessed by association with pain, the Schober test and the General Function Score. Sensitivity to change was determined using a t-test for paired data to compare RMDQ scores at inclusion and at completion of the therapeutic sequence of local corticosteroid injections. We also compared the questionnaire score with the General Function Score, both taken after completion of the therapeutic sequence. The constructed Bland Altman plot showed good reliability. Internal consistency of the RMDQ was found to be very good and the Cronbach's alpha test was 0.94, indicating a good internal construct validity. The questionnaire is correlated with the pain visual analogue scale (r=33; p=0.0001), with the Schober test (r=0.27; p=0.0001) and the General Function Score (r=56; p=0.0001) indicating an adequate external construct validity. The RMDQ administered after the therapeutic sequence is sensitive to change (r=0.83; p=0.000). Comparison of the questionnaire score to the General Function Score, after completion of the therapeutic sequence, was satisfactory (r=0.75; p=0.000). We conclude that the Tunisian version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire has good reliability and internal consistency. Furthermore, it has a good internal- and external construct validity and high sensitivity to change. It is an adequate and useful tool for assessing low-back-pain disability.

Disability Evaluation↗

PubMed1996

Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ).

Quality of life may be considerably reduced in patients who are suffering from chronic lower limb venous insufficiency, although existing generic quality of life instruments (NHP, SF-36 or SIP) cannot completely identify their specific complaints. The Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ) has been developed by iterative process. First, a pilot group of 20 patients was used to identify a number of important features of quality of life affected by venous insufficiency, other than physical symptoms of discomfort. A second study involving 2,001 subjects was used to reduce the number of items. Subjects were asked to score both the severity of their problems and the importance they attributed to each problem on a 5-point Likert scale. The importance items found in patients with venous insufficiency were subjected to factorial analyses (PCA, PAF). The final version is a 20-item self-administered questionnaire which explores four dimensions: psychological, physical and social functioning and pain. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was validated for each dimension (Cronbach's alpha > 0.820 for three out of four factors). Reproducibility was confirmed in a 60 patient test-retest study. Pearson's correlation coefficients for both the four dimension subscales and for the global score at 2-week intervals were greater than 0.940. Finally, the questionnaire was tested in a randomized clinical trial of 934 patients in order to assess responsiveness and the convergent validity of the instrument, together with the patient's own quality of life. This study demonstrated that convergence was valid: Pearson's correlation coefficients between clinical score differences and quality of life score differences were small (from 0.199-0.564) but were statistically different from 0 (p < 0.001). Standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES) were calculated to assess sensitivity to change. SRM and ES both demonstrated considerable responsiveness to change (> 0.80). Reliability, face, content, construct validity and responsiveness were also determined for this specific quality of life questionnaire relating to venous insufficiency. Results suggest that this questionnaire may be used with confidence to assess quality of life in clinical trials on chronic venous insufficiency.

Factor Analysis, Statistical↗