PubMed2026
BACKGROUND: Detecting signals of polygenic adaptation remains a significant challenge in population genomics, as traditional methods often struggle to identify the associated subtle, multi-locus allele-frequency shifts. Here, we introduced and tested several novel approaches combining machine learning techniques with traditional statistical tests to detect polygenic adaptation patterns in time-series of allele frequency changes from whole genome data. We implemented a Naive Bayesian Classifier (NBC) and One-Class Support Vector Machines (OCSVM), and compared their performance against the classical Fisher's Exact Test (FET). Furthermore, we combined machine learning and statistical models (OCSVM-FET and NBC-FET), resulting in 5 competing approaches. The framework is mainly designed and validated for evolve-and-resequence (EaR) experimental designs, where defined selection pressures and temporal sampling are feasible, but might be applicable for certain natural experiments as well. RESULTS: Using a simulated dataset based on empirical C. riparius Pool-Seq data, we evaluated methods across evolutionary scenarios varying in generation, selection strength, and number of loci under selection. Our results demonstrate that the combined OCSVM-FET approach consistently outperformed competing methods, achieving the lowest false positive rate, highest area under the curve, and high accuracy. The performance peak aligned with what we term the 'late dynamic phase' of adaptation - the period after initial selection has occurred but before fixation - highlighting the method's sensitivity to ongoing selective processes. CONCLUSIONS: Furthermore, we emphasize the critical role of parameter tuning, balancing biological assumptions with methodological rigor. While broader applicability remains an important direction for future work, the present benchmarking is intentionally scoped to EaR experimental contexts.