PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 811 records · Page 45Linked to original sources

[Guidelines for drug therapy of postmenopausal osteoporosis].

Osteoporosis is known as a condition characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue leading to bone fragility and a consequent susceptibility to fracture. Osteoporosis has its highest rate of occurrence in postmenopausal women, and in Western countries it has been estimated that for white women aged fifty, the life-time risk of developing an osteoporotic fracture is nearly 40%. Given the consequences of osteoporosis, the most important goal of therapy is to prevent fractures. In Austria, several pharmacologic options for treatment of osteoporosis are available, including bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate), selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene), calcitonins (salm-calcitonin, elcatonin), fluorides (sodium-fluoride, monofluorophosphate), anabolic steroids (nandrolone-decanoate), steroid derivates (tibolone), estrogen and hormone replacement therapy. An evidence-based evaluation of these treatment options clearly indicates that alendronate, risedronate and raloxifene sufficiently reduce the risk of vertebral fractures. There is less evidence for reduction of vertebral fracture risk for etidronate, calcitonin, estrogen replacement therapy or hormone replacement therapy. Only alendronate and risedronate have been shown to reduce the risk of hip fractures. Calcium and vitamin D are useful adjuncts to any specific treatment for osteoporosis, particularly when Calcium and vitamin D deficiencies have been diagnosed. Also, there is good evidence that in women with Calcium and vitamin D deficiency, a combination of Calcium and vitamin D may reduce the risk of non-vertebral fractures. There is no evidence so far that a combination therapy of antiresorptive drugs would result in reduced fracture risk.

Adult↗

Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: Part 1. Detecting the most frequently occurring complications.

Inserting, maintaining, and monitoring vascular access are integral components of neonatal care. Advances in vascular access technology have led to the insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) to provide stable venous access for early and aggressive parenteral nutrition. Medications that are irritating or damaging, or those with a high osmolality or a nonphysiologic pH, can also be safely administered into the central venous system. The need for repeated peripheral intravenous attempts, as well as the associated pain and physiologic instability, are virtually eliminated once a PICC line is placed. Complications related to PICCs may occur at any phase of therapy: during insertion, while indwelling, or after discontinuing the line. The risk factors associated with PICCs are distinctly different from peripheral intravenous lines because of their long dwell time, central placement, and potential to migrate. Part 1 of Focus on the Physical offers a review of the relevant anatomy of the vascular system and a discussion of the appropriate sites for catheter tip placement. Guidelines for a systematic physical assessment, along with recommendations for standardized PICC documentation, are provided. A review of the signs and symptoms of more frequently occurring complications, such as catheter occlusion and bloodstream infections, is presented to enhance awareness of PICC-specific complications in the neonate and to expedite early detection and treatment. Part 2 of this series will focus on systematic assessment for less common complications such as catheter migration, dislodgement, breakage, and thrombosis, as well as the life-threatening complications of pleural and pericardial effusion.

Bacteremia↗

Hemodialysis timing, survival, and cardiovascular outcomes in the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study.

BACKGROUND: The timing of medical therapies has been shown to influence the outcomes and side effects of treatments for disease. This report examines the extent to which hemodialysis treatment time of day was associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and all-cause mortality in a secondary analysis of the Hemodialysis Study. METHODS: Dialysis start time defined dialysis shift: morning beginning between 0400 and 0930 hours (n = 822); midday, between 0930 and 1530 hours (n = 851); and evening, between 1530 and 2200 hours (n = 172). Outcome measures included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, composite end point of all-cause mortality or first cardiac hospitalization, and composite end point of first cardiac hospitalization or cardiac death. RESULTS: Morning hemodialysis was associated with a lower likelihood of cardiovascular events compared with the evening shift in all-cause mortality or first cardiac hospitalization (evening versus morning, relative risk [RR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.65; P = 0.043), as well as first cardiac hospitalization or cardiac death (evening versus morning, RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.89; P = 0.007). No differences were noted in the other 2 outcomes, and there was no statistically significant difference between the morning and midday shifts. Although crude mortality rates were greater in the midday compared with morning (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.39; P = 0.008), this association was attenuated after adjustment (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.22; P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Making extensive adjustment for patient characteristics, this report does not support the association of lower all-cause mortality with morning hemodialysis or a particular benefit for older patients.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

More food please.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Deglutition↗

Repetitive self-injurious behavior: a neuropsychiatric perspective and review of pharmacologic treatments.

The phenomenology, pathophysiology, and psychopharmacology of repetitive self-injurious behavior (rSIB) are reviewed. Although numerous neurotransmitter systems are thought to be involved in the initiation and maintenance of rSIB, the majority of clinical studies attend to the role of serotonin or endogenous opioids. This focus has emerged from a conceptualization of rSIB as a problem of impulse control (primarily mediated by serotonin) and/or as a maladaptive pain-related behavior (ultimately mediated by opioids). A developmental perspective of rSIB is emphasized, highlighting the biased prevalence of rSIB among patients with mental retardation and severe personality disorders and the significance of critical developmental events leading to pathology in "pedagogical" neural circuits. A novel typology is offered in an effort to better match interventions with rSIB subtypes. Achievement of this ultimate goal however, must await further research.

Adult↗

[Antiviral prophylaxis].

Antiviral prophylaxis in pediatric oncology and pediatric bone marrow transplantation (BMT)/stem cell transplantation (SCT) focuses herpes viruses: herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella zoster virus (VZV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) since these viruses cause significant morbidity and mortality due to primary infection or to reactivation in long term latency. The majority of studies on antiviral prophylaxis, especially those on CMV-prophylaxis, have been conducted in adult patients. Recommendations for antiviral prophylaxis have been published recently by the German "Deutsche Gesellschaft für pädiatrische Infektiologie" and by the following American institutions and societies "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", "Infectious Diseases Society of America", "American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation" who published the "Guidelines for Preventing Opportunistic Infections Among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients". Concerning HSV- and VZV-prophylaxis there are almost no differences between recommendations of the german society and the american institutions, however recommendations for preventing CMV-disease and CMV-recurrence do differ considerably. Controversial aspects of antiviral prophylaxis, e.g. VZV vaccination or CMV prevention, should be studied in oncology and infectious diseases working groups to define consensus in the near future.

Acyclovir↗