SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Decision Making”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Facilitating end-of-life decision-making: strategies for communicating and assessing.

End-of-life decision-making is often a difficult process and one that many elderly patients and their families will undergo. The grounded theory study of nurses, physicians, and family members (n = 20) reported in this article examined provider behaviors that facilitated the process of decision-making near the end of patients' lives. According to participants, providers who are experienced and comfortable are more likely to engage in communication and assessment strategies that facilitate end-of-life decision-making. Communication strategies included: being clear, avoiding euphemisms, spelling out the goals and expectations of treatment, using words such as "death" and "dying," and being specific when using such words as "hope" and "better." Assessment strategies included: assessing patients' physical conditions and end-of-life wishes, patients' and family members' understandings of the disease and prognosis, and their expectations and goals. An important first step for improved care is making explicit the provider's communicating and assessing strategies that facilitate end-of-life decision-making.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Medical decision-making: an argument for narrative and metaphor.

This study examines the processes of decision-making used by intensive care (critical care) specialists. Ninety-nine specialists completed a questionnaire involving three clinical cases, using a novel methodology investigating the role of uncertainty and temporal-related factors, and exploring a range of ethical issues. Validation and triangulation of the results was done via a comparison study with a medically lay, but highly informed group of 37 law students. For both study groups, constructing reasons for a decision was largely an interpretative and imaginative exercise that went beyond the data (as presented), commonly resulting in different reasons supporting the same conclusions and similar reasons supporting opposite conclusions. The skills of ethical imagination and interpretation were related to an individual's prior lived experience, construed in the broadest sense. Application of these skills of ethical imagination and interpretation always occurred, to some degree, in a state of uncertainty and almost always involved temporal relationships. Using these results, a theory of ethical decision-making is proffered. Three levels or types of reasoning processes may be present. Type I decision-making involves the application of rules, usually in a deductive fashion. Type II decision-making is characterised by a process where a plurality of reasons are balanced, weighed and sifted with each other. Type III decision-making is intimately linked with respondents lived experiences and 'crafts' the content of type I and II reasoning processes, via the application of ethical imagination and interpretation. Relationships between these three types of reasoning processes, and with narrative ethics, are also discussed.

Anecdotes as Topic↗

PubMed1993

The role of the nurse in ethical decision-making in intensive care units.

This paper focuses on the nurses' role in ethical decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) of hospitals in the UK. There is a paucity of research on the topic, studies published are generally North American or Canadian in origin. The available literature suggests that although nurses are constantly at the intensive care patient's bedside, often making complex decisions about treatment and care, their involvement in ethical decision-making is limited. This paper provides a review of the literature on how ethical decisions are made and the influences on nurses' participation in this process.

Decision Making, Organizational↗

PubMed2004

Spiking Phineas Gage: a neurocomputational theory of cognitive-affective integration in decision making.

The authors present a neurological theory of how cognitive information and emotional information are integrated in the nucleus accumbens during effective decision making. They describe how the nucleus accumbens acts as a gateway to integrate cognitive information from the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus with emotional information from the amygdala. The authors have modeled this integration by a network of spiking artificial neurons organized into separate areas and used this computational model to simulate 2 kinds of cognitive-affective integration. The model simulates successful performance by people with normal cognitive-affective integration. The model also simulates the historical case of Phineas Gage as well as subsequent patients whose ability to make decisions became impeded by damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Affect↗

PubMed2004

[Markov model of decision making for basic therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: oder of monotherapy and expenses for drug therapy].

AIM: To design Markov's model of decision making to study the role of order in the use of most usable basic antirheumatic drugs (methotrexate-MT, parenteral gold--PG and sulfasalasine--SS) in terms of the course duration and cost. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The model was based on metaanalysis made in 2000. The program TreeAge 3.0 was used. The prices for the drugs were taken as mean about Moscow for 2002 and prices presented by ACR for 2002. RESULTS: The sequence MT-PG-SS had the advantage over the other sequences in that less number of patients stopped treatment after 5 and 10 years of therapy. Mean cost of the drugs per patient is the lowest (for five years) if MT is prescribed first. In longer treatment SS-MT-PG is more cost-effective. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to design Markov's models for making decision on optimal therapy of rheumatoid arthritis both in terms of cost and clinical response.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

PubMed1980

Nominal group technique. A method of decision-making by committee.

Committee-work which involves decision-making from a range of alternatives is frequently time-consuming, inefficient, and frustrating. Nominal Group Technique is a structured method of group decision-making which allows a rich generation of original ideas, balanced participation of all members of the group, and a rank-ordered set of decisions based on a mathematical voting method. A brief description of a Nominal Group Technique session is given and its application to decision-making by committees of anaesthetists is illustrated by an example.

Anesthesiology↗

PubMedDate not supplied

An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making: implications for systems design and process measures.

Clinical decision making is driven by information in the form of patient data and clinical knowledge. Currently prevalent systems used to store and retrieve this information have high failure rates, which can be traced to well-established system constraints. The authors use an industrial process model of clinical decision making to expose the role of these constraints in increasing variability in the delivery of relevant clinical knowledge and patient data to decision-making clinicians. When combined with nonmodifiable human cognitive and memory constraints, this variability in information delivery is largely responsible for the high variability of decision outcomes. The model also highlights the supply characteristics of information, a view that supports the application of industrial inventory management concepts to clinical decision support. Finally, the clinical decision support literature is examined from a process-improvement perspective with a focus on decision process components related to information retrieval. Considerable knowledge gaps exist related to clinical decision support process measurement and improvement.

Cognition↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Women's use of resources in decision-making for early-stage breast cancer: results of a community-based survey.

BACKGROUND: The majority of women with stage I/II breast cancer may choose between mastectomy and breast-conserving therapy (BCT). A survey was designed to examine the resources women used in making this decision. METHODS: From 1990 to 1994, 261 patients were diagnosed with or treated for stage I/II breast cancer at Washington Hospital (Fremont, CA). One-hundred seventy-six surviving patients received a questionnaire asking them to anonymously rank various medical and nonmedical persons, audio and visual materials, and decision criteria on a 5-point scale with regard to their influence on that individual's choice to undergo BCT or mastectomy. The BCT and mastectomy groups were similar demographically; approximately 50% were college-educated. Statistical significance of the difference in means between groups was assessed with the t test. The response rate to the survey was 65%. RESULTS: The average survey ranking was > 1.0 for the following: surgeon (4.5), primary care physician (2.8), spouse (2.4), radiation oncologist (1.7), medical oncologist (1.5), American Cancer Society brochure (1.4), and children (1.2). The ranking of children (p = 0.08), friends (p = 0.08), parents (p = 0.09), and spouse (p = 0.13) was higher in the mastectomy group; the ranking of the radiation oncologist (p = 0.001) and ACS brochure (p = 0.03) was higher in the BCT group. The majority of patients consulted only with the surgeon (96%), primary care physician (64%), and spouse (55% overall, 75% among married patients) before making a treatment choice. Decision criteria were ranked as follows: chance for cure (4.5), physician recommendation (3.7), potential side effects (1.7), cosmetic appearance (1.3), sexual attractiveness (1.1), treatment convenience (1.0), and desire to avoid mastectomy (1.5). Desire to avoid mastectomy was higher in the BCT group (p < 0.0001); ranking of chance for cure was higher in the mastectomy group (p = 0.12). Overall satisfaction was higher in the BCT group; 87% of these patients were "very satisfied" with their decision versus 68% for the mastectomy group (p = 0.005). Review of the admitting records for 125 patients treated with mastectomy indicated that 46% had clear medical or personal contra-indications to BCT, but that the remainder might have benefitted from specialty consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon's recommendation and the patient's perception of chance for cure were the most influential factors affecting treatment decision. There was a limited use of specialty consultation or written and audiovisual materials in this educated patient population. The survey results suggest potential areas of intervention to improve rates of BCT, namely use of up-front multidisciplinary evaluation, further education of primary care physicians, and greater attention to concerns of family members.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Association of a traditional vs shared meal decision-making and preparation style with eating behavior of Hispanic women in San Diego County.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of meal decision-making and preparation on Hispanic women's dietary practices. DESIGN: One-on-one structured interviews were conducted, assessing meal decision-making and preparation practices, barriers, and behavioral strategies to eating low-fat and high-fiber diets, fat and fiber intake, demographic, and other psychosocial factors. SUBJECTS/SETTING: The study population included 357 Hispanic women living in the southern or central regions of San Diego County. Participants were recruited via random-digit dialing to a tailored nutrition communication intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Household decision-making style (alone vs with family) by household activity (decides meals, prepares meals, and decides snacks). STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Multiple logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between the predictors and dependent variable. All models included adjustments for potential confounders, such as marital status, education, employment, age, and acculturation. RESULTS: A positive statistical association between Hispanic women's acculturation level and shared decision-making style was found. Also, Hispanic women in shared decision-making households faced greater psychosocial barriers to healthful eating and reported less healthful eating compared with Hispanic women in traditional households. Women in shared decision-making households were more likely to eat at fast-food restaurants, less likely to engage in behavioral strategies promoting fiber consumption, eat more saturated fat, and encounter more barriers to reduce dietary fat as compared with Hispanic women in traditional households. Acculturation did not attenuate differences in psychosocial and dietary practices between shared decision-making and traditional households. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest intervention efforts should focus on different aspects of healthful eating among Hispanic women in shared-decision, compared with traditional, households.

Acculturation↗

PubMed1996

What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

BACKGROUND: Although current ideology suggests patients should be active participants in decision making about their care, the literature suggests that patients wish to be informed but not involved. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that most patients want their physicians to take the responsibility for problem solving (PS, identifying the one right answer), but that many want to be involved in decision-making (DM, selecting the most desired bundle of outcomes) tasks. METHODS: Survey responses from 300 patients undergoing angiogram at a Toronto, Ontario, hospital were analyzed (response rate, 72%). Survey items included scales to measure desire for information and participation, including Autonomy Preference Index, the Krantz Health Opinion Survey, and the Deber-Kraetschmer Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale measured on a scale from, 1 (doctor only) to 5 (patient only). RESULTS: Patients had a relatively high desire for information. On the Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale, they overwhelmingly wished the PS tasks to be performed by or shared with the physician (98.4% of the 12 PS scores are between 1 and 3), but wanted to be involved in DM (78% of the 6 DM scores are between 3 and 5). Preference for handing over control to the physician was significantly greater for the vignette involving potential mortality (chest pain) than for the vignettes involving mainly morbidity (urinary problems) or quality of life (fertility). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients do not wish to be involved in PS tasks, few wish to hand over DM control to their physician. These findings suggest 2 major roles for clinicians--assisting patients in PS to structure choices and supporting them in making often difficult decisions.

Attitude to Health↗

PubMed1996

Nature of decision-making in the terminally ill patient.

The increasing emphasis on the consumer's choice in health care treatment has contributed to the growing trend for decision-making to be shared between the patient and the health care team. If responsibility is to be shared, then it is important that health professionals identify the degree to which patients wish to participate in the decision-making process, in order that they can assist patients to achieve this goal. The seven patient case studies in this pilot study explored terminally ill patients' perceptions of their own participation in the decision-making process. A simple strategy, through the use of picture cards, established patients' actual and preferred forms of decision-making. These cards were presented to the patients at various stages of their illnesses, which permitted a longitudinal analysis of the decision-making process. Patients initially stated that they did not want much input into the decision-making process. In this study, however, as patients became more knowledgeable about their conditions, they desired greater input into the decision-making process. These findings also revealed that, although there was consistency between patients' preferred and actual forms of decision-making when they were initially admitted to hospital, discrepancies became apparent during the later phases of their illness. This emphasises the need for communication between all parties involved in health care decisions.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Health preferences and decision-making needs of disadvantaged women.

AIM: This paper reports the results of a survey of disadvantaged women in La Pintana, a municipality of Santiago, Chile, to determine their health decision-making needs. BACKGROUND: Research is needed as there is no published community-based study focusing specifically on health decision-making needs of disadvantaged women. METHODS: From April to November 1999, we conducted a cross-sectional interview survey of women registered at primary healthcare centres in La Pintana, an impoverished municipality of Santiago, Chile. RESULTS: The survey participants were 554 adult women over 15 years of age. Seventy-five percent reported making current health-related decisions. Types of decisions were primarily about navigation: where, when and from whom to seek care. The most common role in decision-making was sharing the decision with others, specifically husbands and other family members. Fifty-four percent experienced decisional conflict or uncertainty about options. Those reporting more manifestations of decisional conflict were more likely to lack information on available options, pros and cons of the options, and chances of benefits and harms associated with the options; they were also more likely to be unclear about what was important to them, to feel pressure from others, lack skill or ability in decision-making and be older. The most common strategies used when making all types of decisions were obtaining information on options and recommendations, and getting support from others. Participants preferred to receive information about options through counselling from their physicians, rather than nurses, from printed materials and from discussion groups of people facing the same decision. CONCLUSION: The majority of disadvantaged women were actively involved in decision-making and needed decision support to navigate the healthcare system. Nurses should play a more pivotal role in providing health decision support. This study needs to be replicated in other countries and cultural contexts.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Patient participation in decision making about care.

The purpose of this study was to find out how cancer patients perceive patient participation in decision-making and to see which factors in their view facilitate and restrict participation. Data were collected in focus group interviews with 25 patients, most of whom had breast cancer. Data interpretation was based on the method of qualitative content analysis. The results showed that patients, nurses and physicians all play a part in terms of how patients participate in decision-making. Patients defined participation in decision-making in terms of asking questions, obtaining/providing information and choosing from/presenting different alternatives. Among the factors that were thought to promote participation in decision-making were the patient's activity, the presence of a primary nurse/physician, the encouragement of nurses and physicians to participate, the treatment of patients as equals, and nurses and physicians having enough time for patients. As for factors hindering participation in decision-making, reference was made to patient ignorance, physical and mental imbalance and shyness on the part of the patient. Obstacles to participating in decision-making that originated in the nurses and physicians were the tendency for them to treat patients as objects, to fall in a routine, problems with information dissemination and lack of time.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Patient preferences for control in medical decision making: a scenario-based approach.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated patient preferences about involvement in medical decision making and factors that might influence these preferences. METHODS: A questionnaire was used that had one general question and 10 different clinical scenarios, followed by a list of seven options that described varying degrees of patient participation in the clinical decision-making process. The participants were patients presenting to a family practice residency clinic. RESULTS: Using paired t tests, patient responses to seven of 10 clinical scenarios (70%) were statistically significantly different from their responses as predicted by the general question. Six responses showed a positive relationship, ie, patients wanted to give the physician more control than they indicated by their response to the general question. Paired t tests then compared responses to each scenario with responses to every other scenario; 26 of 45 (58%) were significantly different. A factor analysis suggested groupings of scenarios. Significant differences for decision-making preferences were found among age groups and among educational levels. Cronbach's alpha, a measure of internal consistency, was calculated at .81. CONCLUSIONS: Although preference for level of control in medical decision making varied by scenario, our patients most often preferred physicians to play the primary role in decision making. Patient preferences for general decision making correlated poorly with preferences in specific scenarios.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Critical care outreach: the need for effective decision-making in clinical practice (part 2).

As the extension of nursing into roles previously within the domain of medicine and the demand for evidence based practice continue to increase, the quality of decision making becomes imperative. Making accurate decisions is essential, both for the practitioner and for the patient, especially in the provision of critical care outreach (CCOR), to improve outcomes of care. With changes in health care delivery and increased accountability for practitioners' decisions, it is important to understand more about how clinical decisions are made and what factors influence them in order to inform practice. The previous paper outlined the theoretical background of clinical decision making and the knowledge that underpins practice in CCOR. In this paper, the authors, a Nurse Consultant in CCOR and a research fellow, examine the process of a practitioner's decision making in the practice of CCOR, through a collaborative reflective account of a case study. From this, recommendations are made about the future development of CCOR practitioners and services.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Informed consent and decision making by cataract patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate decision making by patients on the day before cataract surgery and to evaluate to what extent the informed consent process influences the patients' decision regarding consent. METHODS: On the day before surgery, 70 patients (mean +/- SD age, 70.3 +/- 10.3 years) underwent a standardized informed consent procedure. They were also invited to answer 15 questions established in interdisciplinary cooperation among clinical psychologists, lawyers, and ophthalmologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed presurgical information and personal estimation of risks in cataract surgery; the patient-physician relationship regarding surgery-related decisions; and evaluations of the informed consent procedure and the patients' decision. RESULTS: Questionnaire answers indicated that 28 (40%) of the 70 participating patients arrived for surgery without any information; 16 (23%) believed that there were surgical procedures without risks; and 53 (76%) estimated that there were no risks for their cataract surgery. A physician-dominated decision for surgery was preferred by 31 patients (44%); 16 (26%) wanted to decide together with their ophthalmologist. Possible risks of a sight-threatening complication did not influence 54 patients' (77%) decisions, and 55 patients (78%) said the informed consent process did not influence their decision. The remaining 15 (22%) stated that the informed consent process positively confirmed their decision. CONCLUSIONS: Informed consent 1 day preoperatively does not seem to influence the decision for cataract surgery. Cognitive dissonance as part of a decision-making process makes changes in an already chosen option unlikely. The resulting limited decisive potential is very important for credibility in a trial and has to be considered in ophthalmologic surgery.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Building bridges between neural models and complex decision making behaviour.

Diffusion processes, and their discrete time counterparts, random walk models, have demonstrated an ability to account for a wide range of findings from behavioural decision making for which the purely algebraic and deterministic models often used in economics and psychology cannot account. Recent studies that record neural activations in non-human primates during perceptual decision making tasks have revealed that neural firing rates closely mimic the accumulation of preference theorized by behaviourally-derived diffusion models of decision making. This article bridges the expanse between the neurophysiological and behavioural decision making literatures specifically, decision field theory [Busemeyer, J. R. & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459], a dynamic and stochastic random walk theory of decision making, is presented as a model positioned between lower-level neural activation patterns and more complex notions of decision making found in psychology and economics. Potential neural correlates of this model are proposed, and relevant competing models are also addressed.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2006

Influences that drive clinical decision-making among rheumatology nurses. Part 1: literature review.

Decisions nurses make while providing patient care to their client group will impact on the patient's immediate and long-term outcomes and will also impact on service provision. Although many studies have focused on the clinical decision-making process itself within general nursing areas, little has been published as to what factors influence decisions in rheumatology nursing at the clinical level. Initial review of the literature suggested the following themes could influence decision-making: clinical decision-making, intuition, evidence-based practice, experiential learning, knowing the patient, skilled knowledge and rheumatology nursing. This article examines the literature surrounding clinical decision-making which may influence decision-making within rheumatology nursing practice.

Decision Making↗