PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Desensitization, Immunologic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources

Treatment update: allergic rhinitis.

In addition to the introduction of several new pharmacologic agents, two of the most significant recent developments in the management of allergic rhinitis have been the renewed emphasis on preventive measures, such as allergen avoidance and immunotherapy, and the importance of performing an accurate differential diagnosis of the disease. Recently, these evolving management trends were delineated in an algorithm proposed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters in Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, which suggests that an initial evaluation be performed by a primary care physician. Based on findings at the initial evaluation, the patient should be treated either empirically in the primary care setting or referred to an allergist-immunologist for consultation. The allergist uses an evidence-based therapeutic approach based on a differential diagnosis of the type of rhinitis, which uses information derived from a detailed medical history, physical examination of the airway, and ancillary tests, particularly skin tests. Rhinitis management by an allergist emphasizes a three-pronged approach that incorporates avoidance, immunotherapy, and pharmacologic therapy. However, because both avoidance and immunotherapy have their limitations, pharmacologic therapy remains the mainstay of rhinitis management, and allergists usually recommend that optimal first-line therapy be broad based and capable of safely alleviating the symptoms of both allergic and nonallergic disease. First generation oral antihistamines, topical corticosteroids and the topical antihistamine azelastine are the most broad-based treatments available. Second-generation oral antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists also are useful in treating allergic rhinitis.

Anti-Allergic Agents↗

Canadian trial of sublingual swallow immunotherapy for ragweed rhinoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual swallow immunotherapy has been increasingly recognized as a safe and efficacious alternative to parenteral specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of sublingual swallow immunotherapy ragweed allergen extract for rhinoconjunctivitis treatment starting just before and continuing through the ragweed pollen season. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in children and adults with a documented history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis during ragweed season at 9 Canadian allergy centers. Active treatment was standardized extract of ragweed allergen administered as sublingual swallow drops at increasing doses starting shortly before the pollen season and maintenance doses continued daily during the season. Primary efficacy variables were symptom and medication scores, and secondary variables included global evaluation of efficacy and immunologic measurements. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included in the safety analysis; 76 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Nine placebo recipients and 1 treatment recipient withdrew for lack of efficacy (P = .004). Nine patients in the treatment group withdrew because of adverse events, none serious (P = .003). Investigator evaluation of efficacy showed that significantly more patients improved and fewer deteriorated in the treatment group vs the placebo group (P = .047). Ragweed IgE and IgG4 levels increased significantly in treatment recipients vs placebo users (P < .001). Sneezing and nasal pruritus approached significant improvement in the treatment group vs the placebo group (P = .09 and .06, respectively). Quebec City experienced low pollen counts. Excluding Quebec City, significant improvement was seen for these 2 symptoms (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Sublingual swallow immunotherapy seems to be safe and efficacious for ragweed rhinoconjunctivitis even when started immediately before the ragweed pollen season.

Administration, Sublingual↗

Allergen-specific immunotherapy induces Th1 shift in dogs with atopic dermatitis.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy has been applied to canine atopic dermatitis. Despite the accumulated clinical evidence of its effect for atopic dogs, the basic immunologic mechanisms were not fully understood. In this study, the cytokine profile ex vivo in canine atopic dermatitis before and after allergen-specific immunotherapy was characterized using competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Blood samples were collected from 10 dogs with atopic dermatitis and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with house dust mite antigen. The levels of IFN-gamma and IL-4 mRNA were lower in atopic dogs compared with non-atopic controls. The ratio of IFN-gamma/IL-4 was low in atopic dogs indicating a cytokine profile polarized to Th2. The level of IFN-gamma after immunotherapy was significantly higher than that before (P < 0.05) whereas that of IL-4 mRNA was not changed. Consequently, the ratio of IFN-gamma/IL-4 after immunotherapy was significantly higher than that before immunotherapy (P < 0.05). These results indicate a Th2 cytokine bias is the dominant state in atopic dogs and allergen-specific immunotherapy causes a shift to wards a Th1 bias by enhancing IFN-gamma expression.

Animals↗

Hyposensitization attenuates airway inflammation and antigen-induced proliferative response by lymphocytes in a rat model of bronchial asthma.

The mechanism of hyposensitization in bronchial asthma has not been fully elucidated. We established a hyposensitization model of bronchial asthma in rats and examined airway responses and immunological parameters. Brown Norway rats were sensitized by a subcutaneous injection of ovalbumin (OA) at day 1 and by the inhalation of 2% OA aerosol at day 15. Animals were hyposensitized by intraperitoneal injections of OA from day 17 to day 22. They were challenged with OA or acethylcholine (Ach) aerosol at day 23 and changes in intratracheal pressure were recorded. Lungs were lavaged and OA-induced proliferative responses by blood lymphocytes were examined for animals without aerosol challenge at day 23. OA-specific serum IgE levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Hyposensitization significantly reduced the OA-induced immediate airway response, accumulation of CD4+ lymphocytes and eosinophils recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage, and the OA-induced proliferative response by blood lymphocytes. The airway responses to Ach and serum OA-specific IgE levels in hyposensitized group were not significantly different from those in the sensitized group. These results indicate that amelioration of airway inflammation and hyporesponsiveness of lymphocytes against OA are involved in the attenuated immediate antigen-induced airway response following hyposensitization.

Acetylcholine↗

Immunotherapy safety: a prospective multi-centric monitoring study of biologically standardized therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases.

BACKGROUND: The fear of side-effects has led to strict regulations preventing a more widespread use of specific immunotherapy (SIT) in some countries, in spite of the low risk of systemic reactions (SRs) reported in well-controlled studies. The goal of the study was to carry out a prospective and multi-centric trial to evaluate the safety, risk factors and compliance degree of commercially available SIT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out in 14 allergy departments from Spain. Four-hundred and eighty-eight patients with rhinitis and/or asthma were submitted to treatment with biologically standardized allergen extracts commercially available. They were administered following the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-three patients (86.7%) completed the treatment and remained under control at the end of the trial. Out of 17,526 administered doses, 17,368 doses (99.1%) were not associated with a reaction. Eighteen patients (3.7%) experienced 53 (0.3% of the doses) SRs. All immediate SRs were mild or moderate and responded well to ordinary treatment measures. There were no fatal reactions, anaphylactic shock or life-threatening reactions. A higher ratio of SRs was found among asthmatic and dust mite allergic patients, although multi-variable logistic analysis did not demonstrate any risk factor associated with SRs. There was also a subgroup of patients at risk for recurrent reactions, and therefore 40% of SRs had been avoided if the maximal number of SRs had been previously limited to only three SRs. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-centric study showed that SIT was a safe treatment with a very good compliance. Future guidelines of SIT should limit the maximal number of SRs.

Adolescent↗

[A modified therapy of hayfever with a depot-preparation (author's transl)].

70 patients with clinically and immunologically verified grass pollen allergy received immunotherapy for the first time in 1977 and 1978. The 70 patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 received 18 injections of a 7 grass pollen extract (semi-depot, Allpyral). Group 2 was treated with 3 injections of a tyrosine adsorbed grass pollen vaccine (Pollagen) immediately preseasonal and Group 3 received 5 injections of the same. Therapy was from September 1977 to May 1978. All patients completed dairy cards on a daily basis for the 1978 season including data on additional medication and areas visited. The air pollen concentration was monitored at various sites in Vienna and surrounding area. Reviewing the symptoms of the 3 patients we noted stronger symptoms reported in Group 2 than in Group 1. There was no significant difference in severity of symptoms in Group 1 and Group 3. The data indicate that a treatment with a course of 5 injections of a tyrosine adsorbed grass pollen vaccine is better than a course of 3 injections of the same product, and equivalent to a standard course of therapy with a semi-depot product.

Delayed-Action Preparations↗

Rush Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: a safe and practical protocol for high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy in allergic patients is a well-established treatment modality for the prevention of systemic anaphylactic reactions caused by insect stings. A variety of therapy regimens exists, from conventional to rush and ultrarush modalities that operate on continuous or intermittent schedules. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the 8-year experience with our rush venom immunotherapy regimen in predominantly high-risk patients and to compare data on safety and convenience with the results of 26 studies published from 1978 to 2001. METHODS: One hundred one patients allergic to bee, yellow jacket, or hornet venom were treated with rush Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy. Diagnosis and selection of patients for venom immunotherapy were carried out according to the recommendations of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. We used a 4-day regimen, and the incidence and nature of systemic reactions (SRs) were documented. Fifty-two patients were treated with honeybee venom, and 49 were treated with yellow jacket venom. RESULTS: One hundred (99%) patients reached the maintenance dose. We observed 8 injection-related SRs (0.47% of all injections given) in 7 (6.9%) patients. The number of SRs was higher in patients treated with bee venom extract (12%) compared with in patients receiving yellow jacket venom extract (2%). There was no significant difference in the risk of SRs between female and male patients. The incidence of SRs was considerably lower than the average of 17.8% reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: With a rush immunotherapy regimen over a time period of 8 years in predominantly high-risk patients, the incidence of SRs was low, despite the high number of patients with bee venom allergy, who are more likely to have side effects. Epinephrine as rescue medication was never necessary, and the regimen proved to be safe and convenient for both the patients and the medical staff.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of conventional and rush immunotherapy with der PI in childhood respiratory allergy.

BACKGROUND: Rush immunotherapy results obtained in Der PI-sensitive children with asthma and the changes in clinical and immunological parameters were investigated. METHODS: We studied 18 patients with Der PI sensitivity. Two groups were randomized: nine patients received RIT and nine patients received conventional immunotherapy (CIT) for three years. The RIT group reached the optimal maintenance dose at the end of one week. The CIT group reached the optimal maintenance dose in approximately three months. Symptom medication scores, lung function, side effects scores, skin-prick test, diluted skin-prick test with Der PI, bronchial provocation tests with Der PI, and Der PI-specific IgE and IgG4 were investigated in baseline conditions, at six months and at the end of the third year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, and duration of illness. Treatment was tolerated very well. However, mean side-effect scores were higher in the RIT group than in the CIT group (p < 0.005). There were no significant differences between groups in the other parameters. CONCLUSION: CIT is more advantageous than RIT in Der PI-sensitive children, although the maintenance dose was achieved more rapidly with RIT.

Allergens↗

Hypoallergenic variants of the Parietaria judaica major allergen Par j 1: a member of the non-specific lipid transfer protein plant family.

BACKGROUND: Par j 1 represents a major allergenic component of Parietaria judaica (Pj) pollen, since it is able to induce an immunoglobulin E (IgE) response in 95% of Pj-allergic patients. It belongs to the non-specific lipid transfer protein family, sharing with them a common three-dimensional structure. METHODS: Disulphide bond variants of the recombinant Par j 1 (rPar j 1) allergen were generated by site-directed mutagenesis, and the immunological activity of rPar j 1 and its conformational mutants was compared with the use of the skin prick test (SPT). The ability to bind IgE antibodies was evaluated by Western blot, ELISA and ELISA inhibition. T cell reactivity was measured by peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation assay. RESULTS: The disruption of Cys14-Cys29 and Cys30-Cys75 bridging (PjA mutant) caused the loss of the majority of specific IgE-binding activity. Additional disruption of the Cys4-Cys52 bridge (PjC mutant) and the latter Cys50-Cys91 bridge (PjD mutant) led to the abolition of IgE-binding activity. On the SPT, PjB (lacking the Cys4-Cys52 and Cys50-Cys91 bridges) was still capable of triggering a type I hypersensitive reaction in 9 out of 10 patients, and PjA in 3 out of 10 patients, while PjC and PjD did not show any SPT reactivity. All the mutants preserved their T cell reactivity. CONCLUSION: Recombinant hypoallergenic variants of the rPar j 1 allergen described herein may represent a useful tool for improved immunotherapy.

Allergens↗

Immunological parameters in the sera of patients with atopic dermatitis and airborne allergy treated with allergy vaccines.

Patients with atopic disorders present an increased production of IgE, which is usually limited to specific antibodies against various environmental allergens. It has also been suggested that the production of these antibodies may be influenced by effective specific immunotherapy (SIT). Of course, a decline of serum antigen specific IgE in the course of such a treatment cannot explain the clinical efficacy of SIT and is probably not a key mechanism. However, SIT may at least participate in the final clinical result. In this study, 37 patients with atopic dermatitis were treated with allergy vaccines (Novo-Helisen Depot) for a time period of 48 months. The control group consisted of 29 patients with atopic dermatitis who were treated with classical methods. The clinical score (W-AZS), total IgE and antigen specific IgE (asIgE) in the sera of patients were assessed before treatment and after 24 and 48 months of therapy (FEIA CAP System, Pharmacia). There was a significant difference between the two investigated groups from both the clinical and immunological standpoints after 2 and 4 years of observation. There was a significant decrease of serum total IgE and asIgE (directed against airborne allergens) in the course of specific immunotherapy. In the control group, the total IgE level tended to increase, and this tendency was also recorded in case of asIgE measurements. We also evaluated the influence of specific immunotherapy on the serum level of IFN-G, sIL-2R, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 before treatment and after 4 years of therapy with the quantitative 2-step colorimetric sandwich ELISA method (R and D Systems). In the group of patients treated with allergy vaccines, a significant decrease of the serum sIL-2R level was observed after 48 months of therapy (p<0.01). In the control group, a significant increase of serum IL-4 (p<0.01) as well as IL-5 (p<0.05) was registered at the end of the observation period. There was no significant correlation between the clinical score and serum level of any of the investigated cytokines in either group of patients before the treatment or after 48 months of therapy.

Adolescent↗

Management of inflammation in allergic asthma (IRINE symposium). Immunology Research Institute of New England.

Allergic inflammation as a cause of asthma is now well recognized. New methods of identification of allergen-specific IgE including improved in vitro technologies will require optimization of the lowest threshold for the detection of allergen-specific IgE in order to maximize sensitivity without loss of specificity, thus allowing for significant enhancement in a clinical setting for determination of allergen-specific IgE levels. New concepts of allergic inflammation include the recognition that significant histologic changes may occur even in the mildest allergic patients. Thus, early intervention with antiinflammatory therapies including corticosteroids or inhaled nedrocromil sodium appears clearly warranted based on these early pathological changes occurring in asthmatic individuals. Inhaled corticosteroids have been demonstrated to prevent pathological changes that otherwise occur in asthmatic patients whose sole therapy is use of inhaled B2 agonist. Corticosteroids have also been noted to be successful in the prevention of progression of pathological changes including the development of bronchiectasis in asthmatic patients with allergic bronchopulmonary fungoses. Allergen-specific immunotherapy may be successfully used in selective asthmatic patients allergic to pollen, dust mite, or certain mold allergens including Alternaria. Immunotherapy appears to be most useful in those patients who are allergic to one rather than many allergens and whose asthma is not associated with other significant precipitating factors such as chronic rhinosinusitis or aspirin sensitivity. The risk of systemic reactions to allergen immunotherapy in the asthmatic patient is significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Allergens↗

Changes of serum cytokines after the long term immunotherapy with Japanese hop pollen extracts.

Japanese hop (Hop J) pollen has been considered as one of the major causative pollen allergens in the autumn season. We developed a new Hop J immunotherapy extract in collaboration with Allergopharma (Reinbeck, Germany) and investigated immunologic mechanisms during 3 yr immunotherapy. Twenty patients (13 asthma with rhinitis and 7 hay fever) were enrolled from Ajou University Hospital. Sera were collected before, 1 yr, and 3 yr after the immunotherapy. Changes of serum specific IgE, IgG1, and IgG4 levels to Hop J pollen extracts and serum IL-10, IL-12, TGF-beta1 and soluble CD23 levels were monitored by ELISA. Skin reactivity and airway hyper-responsiveness to methacholine were improved during the study period. Specific IgG1 increased at 1 yr then decreased again at 3 yr, and specific IgG4 levels increased progressively (p<0.05, respectively), whereas total and specific IgE levels showed variable responses with no statistical significance. IL-10, TGF-beta1 and soluble CD23 level began to decrease during first year and then further decreased during next two years with statistical significances. (p<0.05, respectively). In conclusion, these findings suggested the favorable effect of long term immunotherapy with Hop J pollen extracts can be explained by lowered IgE affinity and generation of specific IgG4, which may be mediated by IL-10 and TGF-beta1.

Bronchial Hyperreactivity↗

Avoidance of bee and wasp stings: an entomological perspective.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Clinicians and researchers in allergy and immunology are often unaware of aspects of stinging insect biology that would be of practical interest to their patients. This review discusses entomological literature pertaining to avoidance of bee and wasp stings, with emphasis on risk factors associated with provoking individual foragers versus disturbing colonies and preventive measures for both circumstances. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent work pertaining to sting avoidance has mostly been concerned with the development and testing of attractants, insecticides and delivery systems for toxic baiting programs to control vespine wasps. SUMMARY: Sting risks and avoidance measures associated with bee and wasp foragers are different from those posed by disturbing colonies. Despite widespread advice to the contrary, no evidence currently exists that wearing perfume or bright, floral-colored clothing elevates sting risk. Foragers usually have to be firmly touched before they will sting; therefore, personal protection largely involves guarding against accidental direct contact. Although still under development, the most effective means for reducing local populations of foraging vespine wasps are toxic baiting programs. Preventing stings from colonies is more problematic and depends mostly on personal awareness when disturbing vegetation. The most effective measure in mitigating the severity of a mass attack is probably the wearing of white or light-colored clothing.

Animals↗

Immunological changes after hyposensitization in house-dust-sensitive asthmatic children: a review.

Patients with allergic diseases are characterized by the presence of elevated total serum IgE and specific IgE antibodies against a variety of environmental allergens. To explore the causes for augmented IgE antibody production and the working mechanisms of hyposensitization (HS), a series of studies has been conducted on house-dust-sensitive, newly diagnosed, and hyposensitized asthmatic children and normals. The specific IgE and IgG antibodies were measured by radioallergosorbent test; the lymphoproliferative capability was measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation; the allergen-specific suppressor activity was determined by the extent of house-dust-activated, interleukin-2 (IL-2)-expanded lymphocytes to suppress the allergen-induced proliferation of autologous mononuclear cells (MNC); and IL-2 was produced by stimulating MNC with allergen or phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and quantitated by its capability to support the proliferation of mouse IL-2-dependent cytotoxic T-cell line. The results showed: 1) HS was effective in 90% of patients in terms of decreased attacks and medication taken; 2) the patients were defective in suppressor T-cell function for IgE production; 3) HS was able to restore the regulatory T-cell function and increase the production of IgG-blocking antibody; and 4) IL-2 production may be used as an indicator for initiation and discontinuation of HS. Therefore, hyposensitization is an effective and specific treatment for allergic bronchial asthma and can partially correct an immunoregulatory aberration in atopic individuals.

Asthma↗

Prophylaxis and therapy of allergy by mucosal tolerance induction with recombinant allergens or allergen constructs.

The mucosal immune system, present along the respiratory, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract, has to discriminate between harmful pathogens and innocuous antigens, such as food, airborne antigens or the commensal bacterial flora. Therefore the mucosal immune system has acquired two opposing immunological functions, i.e. the induction of immunity and defence of mucosal pathogens, and the induction and maintenance of tolerance to environmental antigens and bacterial flora. As described for autoimmunity a breakdown or failure of tolerance induction is believed to lead also to allergies and food enteropathies. Based on the physiological role to prevent hypersensitivity reactions, tolerance induction via the mucosa has been proposed as a treatment strategy against inflammatory diseases, such as allergies. The aim of our research is to develop mucosal allergy vaccines based on the induction of mucosal tolerance and/or the induction of counter-regulatory immune responses with or without the use of certain mucosal antigen delivery systems, such as lactic acid bacteria. The use of recombinant allergens instead of allergen extracts with varying allergen content and composition may be essential for improvement of the treatment efficacy. In the present review we give examples of different animal models of type I allergy/asthma. Using these models we demonstrate that recombinant allergens or hypoallergenic variants thereof can be successfully used to induce mucosal tolerance in a prophylactic as well as a therapeutic treatment regime. That the concept of mucosal tolerance induction/mucosal vaccine delivery may in principal also function in humans is supported by recent clinical trials with locally (sublingual) applied immunotherapy.

Animals↗

Prospective study on immunologic changes induced by two different Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extracts prepared from whole mite culture and mite bodies.

Twenty-four children with bronchial asthma and hypersensitivity to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus by skin titration, specific serum IgE, leukocyte histamine release, and bronchial challenge test were selected for immunotherapy with two partially purified mite extracts. On the basis of age and allergen-specific IgE responses, patients were randomly divided for treatment with either an extract prepared from whole mite culture (WMC) or from purified mite bodies (MB). The content of major allergens was quantified for both extracts. The allergen dose administered during immunotherapy was increased up to the highest tolerated dose. The mean cumulative dose of Der p I was 98.9 micrograms for the WMC-treatment group and 76.7 micrograms for the MB-treatment group. Small, but statistically significant, decreases in RAST and crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis responses to major allergens were recorded after 2 years of treatment. A small increase in specific IgG1 and a large persistent increase in specific IgG4 was recorded in both groups. There was a significant decrease in allergen-specific bronchial sensitivity, skin reactivity, and leukocyte sensitivity in both treatment groups. Between both groups, changes in the different parameters were not significantly different. Our data indicate that immunotherapy with both partially purified house dust mite extracts, WMC, and MB leads to a decrease in allergen-specific IgE responses and induce a response in specific IgG4. Both extracts are comparable in modulating leukocyte and skin sensitivity, as well as bronchial reactivity to mite allergens.

Allergens↗

[Sublingual immunotherapy in children. Immunotherapy Committee of the Spanish Society for Clinical Immunology and Pediatric Allergology].

Sublingual immunotherapy is currently attracting growing interest because of its ease of administration and, according to previous studies, its infrequent and mild adverse effects. However, at least in children, the efficacy of this therapy has not been completely demonstrated. In addition, the mechanisms of action remain to be elucidated since few studies have been published and the results have been contradictory and sometimes inconclusive. For this reason, we performed a literature review through the MEDLINE database, selecting double-blind studies carried out in children. Only 10 studies meeting these requirements were retrieved. All the studies were performed by European researchers and nine were published in European journals. Efficacy was evaluated by clinical parameters and by reduction in medication use. The results on efficacy are not homogeneous, although most support the utility of this route of administration. Moreover, reports of allergens other than those used in these studies dust mites and grass pollens are lacking. In conclusion, further studies evaluating the efficacy of this therapy in children are required. Among the general population, if the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of sensitization to hymenoptera venoms were demonstrated, as has been the case with subcutaneous immunotherapy, the utility of this route of administration would be definitively confirmed. Finally, sublingual immunotherapy could be used in children who have shown systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy or who refuse to undergo injections.

Administration, Sublingual↗

Mite antigens enhance ICAM-1 and induce VCAM-1 expression on human umbilical vein endothelium.

Although sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy has been proved to be effective in the treatment of allergic diseases, controversy surrounds the means by which such a local therapy can induce systemic immunological changes. Adhesion molecules are critical in the regulation of leukocyte traffic. It has been hypothesized that allergenic extract, administered locally, may induce an up-regulation of the mucosal vessel vascular adhesion molecules (CAMs) resulting in local recruitment of circulating inflammatory cells. In the present study we investigated whether the mite antigens, Der p1 and Der p2, can modulate CAM expression of human endothelial cells (HEC). To do this, slices of whole human umbilical cord vein underwent short-term (8 hours) cultures in the presence or absence of mite antigen (baseline, unstimulated controls). Cryostatic sections of the specimens were then evaluated immunohistochemically for expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) molecules. The results revealed that while Der p1 is capable of significantly up-regulating ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on HEC, Der p2 antigen moderately up-regulates ICAM-1 expression but is ineffective in modulating VCAM-1. Although preliminary, these results clearly support the hypothesis that at least some of the effects of sublingual immunotherapy may derive from inflammatory cell recruitment at the site of allergen release.

Administration, Sublingual↗