SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neoadjuvant Therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of various Ukrain doses in the combined treatment of breast cancer. Report 1. Clinical aspects of Ukrain application.

This study was carried out in 75 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer. Patients were divided into three groups of 25. The control group received symptomatic corrective therapy prior to mastectomy. The two other groups were given neoadjuvant therapy with Ukrain injections. The first group received a total course dose of 50 mg Ukrain at single doses of 5 mg injected every second day (a total of 10 injections) and the second group received a total Ukrain dose of 100 mg but with single doses of 10 mg. Five to seven days after the last injection patients from all groups were subjected to mastectomy according to Halsted, Patey or Madden. No allergic reactions or adverse effects were observed after the first course of injections or the whole course of Ukrain therapy, regardless of the dose. After five to six injections some patients noticed slight burning sensations and insignificant morbidity in the tumor area, which, according to a number of authors, testifies to the therapeutic activity of the preparation. Practically all patients who were administered Ukrain noticed remarkable positive changes in the second half of treatment: improvement in appetite, normalization of sleep, disappearance of general weakness and the appearance of confidence in recovery. After the course of treatment with Ukrain, the contours of the tumorous node became more clearly defined, which facilitated mastectomy. Changes in the tumor tissue were one-sided in their qualitative differences in comparison to the control group and were not dose-dependent. Qualitative and quantitative reactions to Ukrain by both intact lymphatic nodes and those affected by the metastatic process contribute to more quantitative and radical performance of the most important stage of mastectomy--removal of the regional cellulose together with the lymphatic nodes. The results of this study showed the efficiency of both doses (50 and 100 mg) of Ukrain with neither performing significantly better than the other.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Surgical therapy for carcinoma of the lung.

Surgical excision of lung cancer remains the treatment of choice for those patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who are determined to have stage I or stage II disease and who have the physiologic capacity to tolerate the planned resection. With proper selection, a number of patients with stage IIIa disease, including a small percentage of those with N2 disease, and a very small highly selected group of patients with stage IIIb (tracheal or carinal involvement) or even stage IV disease (solitary brain metastasis), may be surgical candidates. The resection must be complete to be successful, but also should be as conservative of normal lung tissue as is consonant with this goal. Immediate postsurgical mortality should be no greater than 3% to 6% for the majority of procedures except those associated with some extended resections. Five-year survival rates of 35% to 40% in all resected patients to as high as 80% for those patients with very limited (T1, N0, M0) disease can be anticipated. The use of adjuvant therapy has been disappointing for any significant prolongation of survival. Neoadjuvant therapy has yet to be appropriately evaluated. Surgical resection in the multimodality approach to the treatment of small-cell lung cancer continues under investigation but appears to play a minimal role except in those patients with very early limited disease (stage I and an occasional patient with limited T3, N0 disease). Lymph node involvement appears to preclude beneficial resection except under special circumstances. Currently all resected small-cell lung cancer patients are believed to be most appropriately managed with the addition of standard chemotherapy. The role of irradiation, either local or cranial, in the resected small-cell lung cancer patient is unsettled.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

PubMed1997

Androgen deprivation and radiation therapy: sequencing studies using the Shionogi in vivo tumor system.

PURPOSE: To test the relative effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation on the radiation response of an androgen dependent tumor. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The transplantable, androgen dependent, Shionogi adenocarcinoma was grown as allografts in the hind limbs of NCr/Sed (nu/nu) athymic nude mice. Bilateral orchiectomy was the chosen form of androgen deprivation. Groups of tumors were irradiated to graded tumor doses and then studied for durable tumor control. The radiation response was expressed as the radiation dose required to control 50% of the tumors (TCD50). The sequence of radiation and orchiectomy was studied. RESULTS: When radiation was combined with orchiectomy the Shionogi tumor was significantly more likely to be controlled than when radiation was used alone. Orchiectomy 12 days prior to radiation (neoadjuvant therapy) produced a significantly greater decline in the TCD50 than when orchiectomy was used 1 day or 12 days after radiation (adjuvant therapy). If, before radiation, tumors were allowed to regrow after orchiectomy to their original size in an androgen independent fashion then the advantage was largely lost. Those tumors responding well to neoadjuvant orchiectomy (>50% volume decrease) were significantly more likely to be eradicated by radiation than those with a lesser response. CONCLUSION: When using combinations of androgen deprivation and radiation in the treatment of the Shionogi tumor, sequence and timing of the therapies are crucial to maximize the effect.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1990

Combination regional therapy for extremity sarcoma. A tricenter study.

Patients with extremity sarcomas were treated with a neoadjuvant therapy protocol that had originated within the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. Major objectives were to determine tolerance of therapy and its effects on tumor control and survival. After undergoing biopsy, patients received intra-arterial infusion with doxorubicin hydrochloride (Adriamycin) (30 mg every 24 hours) for 3 days and were allocated by institution to receive irradiation of 30 or 35 Gy in 10 fractions or 46 Gy in 23 to 25 fractions. Surgery was done within 7 to 10 days or 30 days pending irradiation dose. Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 31 patients. There were 60 patients, 29 women and 31 men with a median age of 48 years, with 53 soft-tissue tumors and 7 malignant bone tumors. Stages (American Joint Committee on Cancer) included stage IB, 2 patients; stages IIA and IIB, 9 patients; stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC, 39 patients; and stages IVA or IVB, 10 patients. Limb salvage surgery was done in 57 patients, including radical resection in 23 with large extensive tumors, wide local excision in 30, excision with narrow margins in 7, primary amputation in 3, and delayed amputation in 2 because of wound complications. There was one local recurrence in the 57 patients who had limb salvage surgery. Disease-free and overall survival at 48 months were 47% and 56%, respectively. We conclude that combined therapy for extremity sarcomas in a multicenter setting resulted in excellent local control, good function, and reasonable long-term survival in patients having limb salvage surgery.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Surgical resection of limited disease small cell lung cancer in the new era of platinum chemotherapy: Its time has come.

OBJECTIVE: Although resection is not the standard of care in treating small cell lung cancer, new platinum drugs and modern staging have allowed the role of surgery to be reevaluated. METHODS: We reviewed our institutional experience of 1415 patients with small cell lung cancer from 1976 to 2002 among whom 82 (6%) underwent surgery with curative intent. RESULTS: Median age at surgery was 62 years, and small cell lung cancer of mixed morphology represented 14 of 82 (17%). Treatment consisted of surgery alone in 11% of cases (9/82), surgery with neoadjuvant therapy in 22% (18/82), and surgery with adjuvant therapy in 55% (45/82). Prophylactic cranial irradiation was given to 23% (19/82). The 5-year survival of the entire cohort was 42%. The 5-year survival of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 41) was significantly different according to whether patients had received platinum or nonplatinum regimens (68% vs 32.2%, P = .04). Among patients with stage I disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24), the 5-year survivals for patients receiving platinum and nonplatinum chemotherapy were 86% and 42%, respectively ( P < .02). If patients who received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy (n = 56) were considered, the 5-year survival was significantly better for platinum than for nonplatinum chemotherapy (62% vs 36%, P = .05). The 5-year survival was also better for those undergoing lobectomies (n = 52) than for those with limited resections (n = 15, 50% vs 20%, P = .03). Survival outcomes also differed by gender, with female patients having a 5-year survival advantage over male patients (60% vs 28%, P = .004). CONCLUSION: These results support a reevaluation of the role of surgery in the multimodality therapy for small cell lung cancer, which currently includes only radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma may not increase survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Osteosarcoma is a primary malignancy of bone. Current therapy includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and postoperative (adjuvant) chemotherapy. Prolonged treatment with chemotherapeutic agents may place patients at increased risk for complications including secondary malignancy. The authors have had promising results with neoadjuvant therapy and surgery alone in the treatment of osteosarcoma. This study retrospectively examines neoadjuvant therapy and surgery alone for the treatment of primary osteosarcoma of bone with no evidence of distant metastases. METHODS: Fifty-four patients, with localized osteosarcoma of bone received neoadjuvant therapy followed by definitive surgical resection. Thirty-five patients received chemotherapy after surgery (adjuvant group) and nineteen patients were followed without postoperative chemotherapy (no adjuvant group). RESULTS: Tumor necrosis was predictive of survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the use of postoperative chemotherapy was not a predictor of improved outcome. Four patients in the adjuvant therapy group died of secondary malignancy compared with none of the no adjuvant therapy group. Patient age, sex, race, and tumor location were not predictive of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of localized osteosarcoma of bone did not increase survival after neoadjuvant therapy and definitive surgical therapy. Instead, there was an increased incidence of secondary malignancy after its use.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

[Efficacy of current adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapeutic concepts in gastric cancer?].

The incidence of gastric cancer in Europe is declining but the prognosis after curatively intended surgery remains dismal. In recent years several studies and meta-analysis concerning the impact of adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiation as well as preoperative chemotherapy were published. This review aims to interpret results and to support decision making in individual patients. Results of trials on adjuvant chemotherapy were inconsistent and the studies were underpowered to detect meaningful but modest advantages. Meta-analyses including more than 3 000 patients revealed a significant survival benefit but no specific chemotherapy protocol can be regarded an optimal regimen. Postoperative adjuvant schedules including cisplatin led to high drop out rates due to toxicity. Applying cisplatin and infusional fluorouracil initially after diagnosis as a so called neoadjuvant therapy is better tolerated. Two trials testing this approach showed a significant survival benefit with preoperative cisplatin and infusional fluorouracil as compared to surgery alone. Postoperative chemoradiation was shown to be effective concerning local regional relapses and survival benefit in a large trial in the US but the majority of patients were treated with less radical lymph node dissection than it is routine in Germany. Enrollment of patients in prospective trials evaluating the impact of adjuvant and neoadjuvant strategies is warranted.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2001

[Response evaluation--pathway for accurate indications development].

Only patients, which respond to neoadjuvant therapy and in which a subsequent complete resection (R0) is possible, demonstrate a significant survival advantage compared to non-responders. Therefore, a sensitive response evaluation is of high clinical interest. Response evaluation by endoscopy, biopsy, endoluminal ultrasound or by CT scan showed unfavourable and overall nor reliable results. In recent studies, a accurate response prediction employing 18FDG-PET seems to be possible. Following neoadjuvant chemoradiation of esophageal cancer, a sensitive differentiation between responders and non-responders was possible in a retrospective study. In the beginning are investigations, to differentiate already after two weeks of therapy between both groups of patients.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

PubMed2001

The use of trimodality therapy for the treatment of operable esophageal carcinoma in the veteran population: patient survival and outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve the cure rates associated with surgical therapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is being used with increasing frequency before resection (trimodality therapy). A variety of clinical trials have reviewed this approach, but only one study to the authors' knowledge has shown a survival benefit for trimodality therapy. The extent to which trimodality therapy has gained acceptance in general practice is not clear. The objective of the current study was to determine the extent to which both surgery and trimodality therapy are used for the management of esophageal carcinoma within a large, national health care system and to determine the outcome of patients treated with these treatment approaches. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective cohort study. The study population was comprised of all veterans who underwent either surgery alone or trimodality therapy for operable esophageal carcinoma between the fiscal years of 1993 and 1997. Data were obtained from the Veterans Administration Patient Treatment File, Outpatient Clinic File, and the Beneficiary Identification Record Locator System. The main outcome measures were perioperative mortality and patient survival. RESULTS: During the study period, 695 patients underwent either surgery alone or trimodality therapy for esophageal carcinoma. Five hundred thirty-four (77%) patients were treated with surgery only. One hundred sixty-one (23%) patients underwent surgery after induction chemoradiotherapy (trimodality therapy). Patients selected for trimodality therapy were younger (mean age, 60.8 years vs. 65.6 years), had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to have a midesophageal tumor. The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. The type of treatment had no apparent effect on survival. Favorable prognostic factors included younger age, a distal esophageal tumor, and the absence of metastases. The overall perioperative mortality was 13.7 %. The use of trimodality therapy did not increase perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality therapy is commonly used within the VA system. The nonrandomized nature of this study does not allow comparison of trimodality therapy to surgery alone, but the overall survival was limited for all patients. The predictors of survival are related to the biology of the disease, and they include patient age, tumor location, and stage at diagnosis.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Controversies in the treatment of prostate cancer with maximal androgen deprivation.

The concept of maximal androgen deprivation (MAD) has become the accepted therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. MAD is also under investigation as neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Innovative new approaches, such as intermittent androgen deprivation and new combination therapies, will emerge over the next decade.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2005

Epidermoid anal cancer: a review of a population-based series of 308 consecutive patients treated according to prospective protocols.

PURPOSE: The primary therapy in epidermoid anal cancer is radiotherapy, generally with chemotherapy. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been infrequently reported in the literature. This study presents results from a large population-based series and provides comparisons between different treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1985 and 2000, 308 patients with invasive epidermoid anal cancer were diagnosed in the Stockholm Health Care Region. Treatment was given according to defined protocols. External beam radiotherapy alone or with concomitant bleomycin and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy alone were the primary treatments. Radical surgery was reserved for poor responders or recurrences. Data were reviewed with regard to treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among the 276 patients (90%) treated with curative intent, 264 (96%) received treatment in accordance with the protocols. The overall 5-year survival rate was 68%. Among the 142 patients with locally advanced tumors (T > or =4 cm or N+), patients treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 91) had significantly better complete response rates compared with patients treated with radiotherapy with or without bleomycin (n = 51) (92% vs. 76%, p < 0.01). A significantly increased overall 5-year survival rate was also found among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (63% vs. 44%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Structured treatment protocols result in favorable outcome on a population level. The results further suggest a significant therapeutic gain from including neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

[Locoregional treatment of breast cancer: surgery and radiotherapy].

Locoregional control of breast cancer can be achieved with surgery and radiotherapy. Surgery and irradiation is advocated for in situ carcinoma and invasive breast cancer. For T4 lesions, breast cancer locoregional treatment must be performed after neoadjuvant therapy. Locoregional recurrences without distant metastasis need radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Locoregional control of breast cancer is a part of the multidisciplinary approach of this disease.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2006

Novel mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy: genomic and nongenomic considerations.

Selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators have been the most commonly used neoadjuvant therapy for hormone-dependent breast cancer. However, resistance to endocrine therapy, either inherent or acquired during treatment, presents a major challenge in disease management. The causes of resistance to hormone therapy are not well understood and are the subject of active investigation. It is increasingly clear that decreasing sensitivity of ER-positive breast cancer cells to antiestrogens is caused by several factors. Cross talk between ER and growth factor signaling has emerged as a critical factor in endocrine resistance. Here, we present evidence that receptor tyrosine kinase signaling also plays a role in resistance by controlling the subcellular localization of ER signaling components. Localization of ER in either the nuclear or cytoplasmic compartments has functional implications. Recent work suggests that dynein light chain 1, a recently identified substrate of p21-activated kinase 1, modulates ER transactivation functions through a novel ER coactivator function. Likewise, receptor tyrosine kinase signaling can also alter the expression of ER coregulators such as metastasis-associated antigen 1, leading to hormonal independence. Furthermore, proline-, glutamic acid-, leucine-rich protein 1, an ER coactivator involved in both genomic and nongenomic signaling pathways, is activated by epidermal growth factor receptor and plays a prominent role in resistance to tamoxifen. These recent advances suggest new targeted therapeutic approaches that may lead to either reversion or prevention of endocrine resistance in breast tumors.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation concurrent with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients staged as IB2-IIIB were treated with three 21-day courses of carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve 6 mg.min/ml) and paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) by 3-h infusion both on day 1 followed by radical type III hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation concurrent with 6-weekly doses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2). Response rate, resectability, toxicity and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: From December 2000 to June 2001, 43 patients were recruited. All were evaluated for response and toxicity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 129 courses were administered. Clinical responses were seen in 41 patients (95%) [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.2% to 100%] with four (9%) complete and 37 (86%) partial. Forty-one patients underwent surgery (resectability 95%); pathologically complete or near-complete responses were seen in seven (17%) and eight (20%), respectively, positive surgical margins in five (12%), and positive pelvic lymph nodes in eight (20%). Twenty-six patients were scheduled for adjuvant chemoradiation. External radiation was delivered for 42.8 days (range 33-61), with a mean dose of 49.3 Gy (range 46-56), and a median of five cisplatin courses (two to six). The mean dose of brachytherapy was 32 Gy (range 25.5-35.6). Neoadjuvant therapy was well-tolerated with neutropenia grade 3 and 4 in 12% and 3% of the courses, respectively. Toxicity to adjuvant chemoradiation was mainly hematological and gastrointestinal, mostly grades 1/2. A total of 39 patients completed all scheduled treatment. At a median follow-up of 21 months (range 3-26), the projected overall survival in the intention-to-treat analysis was 79% (95% CI 62% to 88%). CONCLUSIONS: The triple modality of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation concurrent with cisplatin is a highly active treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma with acceptable toxicity.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Trends in the utilization of androgen-deprivation therapy for patients with prostate carcinoma suggest an effect on mortality.

BACKGROUND: After a surge in the incidence of prostate carcinoma in the early 1990s, diminishing rates of mortality became apparent in 1993. This decrease in mortality is unlikely to be explained entirely by treatment with curative intent alone following screen-detected cases, because the time frame between detection and mortality remains relatively brief. METHODS: This study used incidence and initial treatment data from the Detroit area SEER registry between 1973 and 1998 in addition to mortality data covering the Metropolitan Detroit area obtained from the Michigan Department of Community Health. Data for Caucasian and African-American men were analyzed. The use of androgen-deprivation therapy, which evolved during the study period, was evaluated in conjunction with mortality and incidence trend data for consideration of etiologic contributions. RESULTS: The incidence of prostate carcinoma, as noted previously in national data, increased sharply in 1988, peaking in 1992 in Southeast Michigan, whereas mortality rates began to decrease in approximately 1993, with a sustained decrease to the latest recorded data in 1998. These trends were identical in Caucasians and African Americans. A sharp increase in the use of androgen-deprivation therapy began in 1990. This use of androgen-deprivation therapy is high and sustained for patients with early-stage disease, increases for several years, and then diminishes for patients with regional disease. The use also diminished through the 1990s for patients with late-stage disease, paralleling the decrease in the incidence rate for late-stage disease. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of androgen-deprivation therapy usage was consistent with that for hormonal monotherapy and adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. These findings suggest that androgen-deprivation therapy may contribute, along with advances in diagnostic techniques and curative therapy with radiation or surgery, toward decreasing prostate carcinoma mortality rates in Southeast Michigan.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

The future in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: positron emission tomography.

Since its introduction in 1974, positron emission tomography (PET) has gained widespread use, especially in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. In this respect, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is by far the most used PET tracer exploiting the increased glucose uptake and metabolism in malignant cells. A large number of studies have suggested that addition of FDG-PET to conventional workup can improve diagnosis and staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In meta-analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of PET in diagnosing single pulmonary nodules and masses is found to be 96 and 78%, respectively. In mediastinal staging, the sensitivity and specificity of PET is estimated to be 83 and 92%. In order to achieve high diagnostic values from PET, it is necessary to pay attention to a number of pitfalls, e.g., the uptake of FDG by inflammatory cells causing false-positive results, as well as size and histology of the tumour in order to avoid false-negative results. In 2001, the first integrated PET/computed tomography (CT) was installed, and since then, the use of this modality has expanded steadily, thereby decreasing examination time and overcoming the lack of anatomical details on PET. Recently, PET and PET/CT have become increasingly integrated in therapy planning and evaluation: response evaluation during and after chemotherapy, restaging after neoadjuvant therapy, planning of radiotherapy and detection of recurrent disease are all examples of emerging indications for PET and PET/CT in managing patients with lung cancer.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

PubMed2006

Aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer therapy: a variety of treatment strategies.

Until recently, standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in the preoperative neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant settings was the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen. An alternate therapeutic approach is to suppress total-body estrogen synthesis using an aromatase inhibitor. The highly potent and specific third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole) have consistently demonstrated improved efficacy over tamoxifen in large randomised neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials. As neoadjuvant therapy, compared with tamoxifen, all three aromatase inhibitors significantly improved breast-conserving surgery rates, but only letrozole achieved a significantly higher overall response rate. These agents have also been evaluated in three adjuvant strategies: instead of tamoxifen for 5 years, sequenced after 2-3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended adjuvant therapy following a full 5-year course of tamoxifen. In all cases, the aromatase inhibitor was significantly more effective in reducing the risk of recurrence, compared with tamoxifen in the first two approaches and with placebo or no treatment as extended therapy. Long-term aromatase inhibitor treatment is associated with less endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events and strokes than tamoxifen, but more musculoskeletal disorders and bone loss. Further investigation is focusing on identification of the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from each of these adjuvant therapy options.

Aromatase Inhibitors↗

PubMed2003

P7 antigen expression in human breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Evaluate p7 expression in human breast cancer and determine whether chemotherapy and radiation therapy effect a change in p7 expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using a p7-specific monoclonal antibody with immunohistochemistry and Western immunoblot analyses to assess p7 expression in archival, frozen breast cancer specimens both before and after therapy. RESULTS: A novel 7 kDa protein (p7), originally identified in multidrug-resistant ovarian and breast cancer cell lines, was found to be expressed in 21 of 64 (32%) primary, unselected human breast cancer specimens by immunohistochemistry with the use of a p7-specific monoclonal antibody, 1D7. P7 was observed in malignant cells but not in other types of cells in the breast tissue. Western blot analysis confirmed the 7 kDa polypeptide in p7-positive breast carcinomas identified by immunohistochemistry. P7 expression was significantly associated with breast cancers having distant metastasis and/or local recurrence (P = 0.027, Fisher's exact test). In addition, p7 expression was significantly increased in post-treatment breast cancer biopsy specimens compared with pretreatment breast cancer biopsy specimens in patients with locally advanced breast cancer after 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and radiation therapy [2 of 15 (13%) pretreatment breast cancers compared with 8 of 15 (53%) post-treatment breast cancers; P = 0.016, McNemar's test]. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that expression of p7 is associated with malignant tumor cells in primary breast cancers, especially those showing recurrent or metastatic disease. Its specific association with the malignant phenotype suggests it may have potential for novel target-based therapies. The markedly increased expression in patients with locally advanced disease after neoadjuvant therapy suggests a role for p7 in treatment outcome.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗