[Selective intestinal decontamination in intensive care. Reduction inpatient mortality without an increase in resistant pathogens].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anesthesia, Inhalation↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Anesthesia, Inhalation”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[TIVA with propofol-remifentanil or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-fentanyl in laparoscopic operations. Hemodynamics, awakening and adverse effects].
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the differences between TIVA with propofol/remifentanil (P/R) and balanced anaesthesia with sevoflurane/fentanyl (S/F) in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Emphasis was put on haemodynamic reaction, recovery profile, postoperative side effects and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to receive either total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol/remifentanil or anaesthesia with sevoflurane/fentanyl. After premedication (midazolam) and induction of anesthesia (propofol, atracurium) in both groups, either 1 microgram/kg fentanyl (S/F) or 1 microgram/kg remifentanil (P/R) was injected. Anaesthesia was maintained with 0.5 microgram/kg/min remifentanil (reduced to 50% after 5 min) and 0.06 microgram/kg/min propofol (P/R) or 1.7 vol % sevoflurane (S/F). Both groups were mechanically ventilated with 30% oxygen in air. The administration of sevoflurane and the infusion of the anaesthetics were adjusted to maintain a surgical depth of anaesthesia. For postoperative analgesia 1 g paracetamol was administered rectally prior to surgery. After recovery 20 mg/kg metamizol was given intravenously. At the end of surgery the anaesthetics were discontinued and haemodynamics, early emergence from anaesthesia, pain level, frequency of analgesic demand, incidence of PONV, shivering and patient satisfaction were assessed. Parameters were recorded for 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Recovery time after propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia was significantly shorter than after administration of sevoflurane and fentanyl (spontaneous ventilation 4.1 vs. 6.3 min, extubation 4.3 vs. 9.3 min, eye opening 4.4 vs 8.2 min, stating name 5.3 vs. 13.2 min, stating date of birth 5.4 vs. 13.3 min). There were no significant differences between the groups in shivering, pain score, analgesic demand and PONV. The S/F group responded to tracheal intubation with significantly higher blood pressure than the P/R group. During maintenance of anaesthesia heart rate in patients with S/F was significantly higher (P/R:HR max +16/-10; S/F:HR max +24/-0.). Measured on a scale (S/F 62%). CONCLUSION: Compared with patients given balanced anaesthesia with sevoflurane and fentanyl, TIVA with propofol and remifentanil proved to be particularly suited for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Its major advantages are haemodynamic stability, significantly shorter times of emergence, and the exceptional acceptance by the patients.
Adult↗
[Epileptoform EEG activity: occurrence under sevoflurane and not during propofol application].
In a 62-year-old female patient without a history of epileptic seizures EEG monitoring (EEG monitor: Narcotrend) was routinely performed during propofol/remifentanil and during sevoflurane/remifentanil/nitrous oxide anaesthesia. In the first course of anaesthesia after a bolus of propofol 1% a continuous EEG slowing was followed by a burst suppression pattern without occurrence of epileptiform activity throughout this sequence. During the second course of anaesthesia the sevoflurane concentration was increased from 2 to 8 % by volume. After 5 min epileptiform activity appeared in the EEG at an endtidal concentration of 5.9% by volume.
Anesthesia, Inhalation↗
[Propofol-remifentanil versus sevoflurane-remifentanil for anesthesia for pediatric procedures in infants, children and adolescents].
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using propofol and remifentanil (P/R-group) and balanced anaesthesia (BA) using sevoflurane and remifentanil (S/R-group) for paediatric surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients aged 6 months to 16 years scheduled for elective minor lower abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (5-10 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.125-1.0 microgram/kg/min) or sevoflurane (1.0-1.5 MAC) and remifentanil (0.125-1.0 microgram/kg/min). Perioperative haemodynamics as well as recovery and discharge times, PONV and side-effects were studied. The patients vigilance, comfort and pain intensity were assessed postoperatively using the objective pain discomfort scale, the Steward post-anaesthetic recovery score and a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Postoperative recovery (9.0 vs 11.6 min) and extubation times (11.8 vs. 15.0 min) as well as the time taken until a Steward post-anaesthetic recovery score > 3/4 (15.2 vs. 21.4 min) was reached were significantly shorter in the P/R-group. However, the length of time until discharge to the ward, postoperative comfort, pain intensity and analgesic requirements as well as PONV were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With regards to the investigated parameters, TIVA with propofol and remifentanil is equally effective as BA with sevoflurane and remifentanil in paediatric patients. However, considering the selected dosing regimen, recovery times were significantly shorter for children after TIVA.
Abdomen↗
Nocturnal episodic hypoxemia after ambulatory breast cancer surgery: comparison of sevoflurane and propofol-fentanyl anesthesia.
PURPOSE: To study the incidence and severity of nocturnal episodic hypoxemia after ambulatory breast cancer surgery and its differences with sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty-one adult female patients (ASA PS I-II; age, 32-77 years) without an apparent history of sleep apnea and respiratory disease undergoing major breast cancer surgery on an outpatient basis and with planned overnight admission were randomized to one of two anesthesia maintenance groups: sevoflurane anesthesia (SEV, n = 31) or intravenous propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium anesthesia (TIVA, n = 30). All patients were administered propofol 2 mg x kg(-1) intravenously for anesthesia induction, had a laryngeal mask airway placed, and received rectal diclofenac and local infiltration anesthesia for pain relief. No opioid analgesic or oxygen was administered after discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Oxygen saturation (Sp(O) (2)) was recorded continuously during the first postoperative night. Sp(O) (2) <90% that lasted >10 s was regarded as hypoxemia, and the percentage of effective recording time with Sp(O) (2) <90% (%time with Sp(O) (2) <90) was evaluated. RESULTS: Six patients (SEV3/TIVA3) had >1% of %time with Sp(O) (2) <90 (S-hypoxemia group), 17 (SEV7/TIVA10) had >0% and <or=1% (M-Hypoxemia group), and 38 (SEV21/TIVA17) had 0% (no-hypoxemia group). There were no statistical differences in age, ASA PS, anesthesia technique, and duration of anesthesia among groups. The S-hypoxemia group had higher body mass index (BMI) and incidence of oxygen supplementation in the PACU than the no-hypoxemia group. No patient had major complications. CONCLUSION: Nocturnal episodic hypoxemia occurs frequently after ambulatory breast cancer surgery. The incidence was not different between SEV and TIVA. Hypoxic patients had a higher BMI and needed oxygen therapy in PACU more frequently.
Adult↗
Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in children undergoing outpatient ear, nose, and throat surgery.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients undergoing adenoidectomy with or without myringotomies (BMTs). To compare the hemodynamic effects of the two drugs. DESIGN: Open, randomized study. SETTING: University-affiliated pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: 39 ASA physical status I children aged 12 months to 12 years undergoing adenoidectomies with or without BMTs. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive sevoflurane or halothane in 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. All patients received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg orally as premedication, as well as fentanyl 1 mcg/kg intravenously (i.v.) immediately following induction. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg i.v. Anesthesia was maintained with an end-tidal concentration corresponding to 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of each drug until the end of surgery, at which time all anesthetic gases were discontinued simultaneously. Emergence (extubation), recovery (Steward score = 6), and discharge times were compared among patients in both groups. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure were compared at predetermined intervals. Additional fentanyl was administered after full recovery was documented for an objective pain score of at least 6. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Emergence from anesthesia was significantly faster (7.11 +/- 3.05 minutes vs. 9.58 +/- 5.12 minutes) and recovery (19.89 +/- 10.07 minutes vs. 31.08 +/- 9.81 minutes) more rapid in the sevoflurane group. However, there was no difference in the time to meet home discharge criteria (184 +/- 49 minutes vs. 189 +/- 48 minutes). HR was consistently maintained at or above baseline in the sevoflurane group. Blood pressure was significantly more depressed after fentanyl administration in the halothane group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative vomiting between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane provides a faster anesthetic emergence and recovery than halothane in premedicated patients but it does not expedite meeting current home discharge criteria.
Adenoidectomy↗
[Maternal and foetal anaesthesia for ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure].
The ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure is a surgical procedure maintaining utero-placental circulation during caesarean section. Anaesthetic implications are described: foetal transplacental anaesthesia to avoid first breathing and to permit surgical procedure on obstructed foetal airway, deep maternal haemodynamically stable anaesthesia to relax uterine smooth muscle during a long caesarean procedure but avoiding post-partum haemorrhage. Volatile anaesthesia with sevoflurane seems to be adequate for these aims. Two cases are described.
Adult↗
[Is entropy a monitor for the guidance of intraoperative analgesia?].
OBJECTIVE: Comparison between BIS (Bispectral Index) and state (SE) and response (RE) entropy during laparotomy for inflammatory bowel disease patients (IBD) and evaluation of the variations of RE and SE during nociceptive stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen IBD's patients undergoing laparotomy were included. Anaesthesia aimed to maintain BIS between 40 and 60 by isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Analgesia was performed by sufentanil bolus administrated according to an increase of 20% of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate compared with the baseline values. BIS, RE and SE were measured at each nociceptive stimulation. A variance analysis (Anova) was used to assess BIS, RE and SE variations throughout surgery (p<0.05 as significant). Relationship between BIS, RE and SE was assessed by Pearson correlation (p<0.01 as significant). The ability for SE and RE to predict depth of anaesthesia and intraoperative analgesia was performed by calculating area under the receiver operated curves (AUC). RESULTS: BIS and entropy parameters had strictly the same evolution during anaesthesia. SBP increased significantly during nociceptive stimulation while no variation of RE was observed. A significant correlation was shown between BIS, RE and SE. The evaluation of anaesthesia depth was good for RE (AUC: 0.932+/-0.26) and SE (AUC: 0.926+/-0.27). There was however no difference between RE and SE to predict analgesic requirement. CONCLUSION: Because RE includes muscular frequency analysis, it does not allow analgesic requirement evaluation in paralyzed patients.
Adult↗
Four cases of the ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure: anesthetic implications.
The ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure is a method of maintaining utero-placental circulation during cesarean section to gain time to secure a potentially obstructed fetal airway. Four cases of the EXIT procedure are described with special reference to the maternal anesthetic technique. Deep volatile anesthesia (approximately 2 MAC) with isoflurane or sevoflurane for a prolonged period of time, in three cases in combination with an intravenous nitroglycerin infusion, was used to ensure a fully relaxed uterus during the procedure. All mothers were maintained hemodynamically stable with preserved utero-placentary perfusion. It was possible to intubate the tracheas of two fetuses, whereas in the other two tracheostomies had to be performed. Fetal gas exchange was not negatively affected during the EXIT procedure as evidenced by normal blood gas values in the umbilical artery at the time of delivery. After reducing the concentration of volatile anesthetic, delivery of the neonate and administration of oxytocin, uterine contractility was promptly re-established and there were no signs of uterine atony in the postoperative period. All four neonates survived the procedure without complications.
Adult↗
Routine immediate extubation after cardiac operation: a review of our first 100 patients.
BACKGROUND: Early extubation after cardiac operation is an important aspect of fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Immediate extubation is an extension of this concept. We describe a technique that allows immediate extubation in the majority of patients. METHODS: To allow rapid emergence, anesthesia was modified from a high-dose opioid technique to intravenous propofol anesthesia supplemented with sevoflurane. Normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass was used with routine intermittent antegrade and retrograde tepid blood cardioplegia. High thoracic epidural analgesia was used to facilitate immediate extubation in the majority of patients. Contraindications to immediate extubation were prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (>2.5 hours), hemodynamic instability, uncontrolled bleeding, morbid obesity, severe pulmonary hypertension, congestive cardiac failure, or if the operation was emergent. RESULTS: Of 109 consecutive patients, 100 were immediately extubated (92%). No patient required reintubation within the first 24 hours after operation. One patient required reintubation 3 days after operation for sputum retention, and 2 patients required reoperation. There was no mortality and the incidence of perioperative morbidity was low. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate extubation after cardiac operation can be safely achieved and is possible in a majority of patients.
Aged↗
Anesthesia for laser transmyocardial revascularization.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aluminum Silicates↗
Supraspinal pupillary effects of intravenous and epidural fentanyl during isoflurane anesthesia.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural fentanyl has been shown to gain rapid access to the circulation resulting in supraspinal effects. We compared the supraspinal effects of fentanyl via epidural versus intravenous (IV) routes, during isoflurane anesthesia. Supraspinal fentanyl effect was evaluated as a reduction of pupillary reflex dilation (PRD) measured with infrared pupillometry. METHODS: Eighteen patients undergoing abdominal procedures were studied during combined epidural and general anesthesia. General anesthesia was provided by 0.55 to 0.70% end-tidal isofurane in air:oxygen (50:50). Sensory block of the surgical field was established with bupivacaine 0.375% and confirmed by absence of PRD to cutaneous stimulation. A high cervical dermatome was then stimulated (60 to 70 mA) at 5-minute intervals via cutaneous needle electrodes, and PRD was measured with each stimulation, using infrared pupillometry. Baseline PRD was determined and then a randomized injection of cpidueral saline (n = 6), epidural fentanyl 3 microg/kg (n = 6), or IV fentanyl 3 microg/kg (n = 6) was given. Subsequently, PRD was measured at 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 80 minutes. Maximum change in PRD and time to maximum change were calculated for each group. RESULTS: Following epidural injection, suppression of PRD was highly variable among subjects. The maximum suppression was 70+/-15% at 23.3+/-10.3 minutes for the epidural group and 96+/-3% at 10.8+/-7.4 min for the IV group (P<.0001). Epidural saline produced no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Supraspinal effects of epidural fentanyl can be assessed during general anesthesia using infrared pupillometry. Epidural fentanyl 3 microg/kg produces significant but variable supraspinal effects during 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane anesthesia.
Adult↗
Rocuronium duration of action under sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol anaesthesia.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate whether the duration of action of a single bolus dose of rocuronium is influenced by maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol infusion. METHODS: Fifty-seven ASA I-II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were enrolled in this study. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5 mg kg(-1) or propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) and fentanyl 5 microg kg(-1) and tracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium 0.9 mg kg(-1). Thereafter patients were randomly allocated to three different groups to receive sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery of neuromuscular function was monitored by single twitch stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the adductor pollicis response using accelerometry. Intergroup recovery times to 5% of control value of single twitch were analysed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval) recovery time to 5% of control value of single twitch during desflurane anaesthesia was 90.18 (86.11-94.25) min. Significantly shorter recovery times were observed during sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia, 58.86 (54.73-62.99) min and 51.11 (45.47-56.74) min, respectively (P < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the recovery time between groups receiving desflurane vs. sevoflurane (P < 0.001) and desflurane vs. propofol (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane anaesthesia significantly prolongs the duration of action of rocuronium at 0.9 mg kg(-1) single bolus dose, compared to sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia maintenance regimens.
Abdomen↗
Time course and train-of-four fade of mivacurium block during sevoflurane and intravenous anaesthesia.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Volatile anaesthetics inhibit nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at clinically relevant concentrations with higher affinity for the neuronal nicotinic receptor. The inhibitory effects of propofol on nicotinic receptors have only been documented at supraclinical concentrations. The aim of this study was to determine recovery properties and train-of-four (TOF) fade of mivacurium during sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia, in order to examine any differences both in the enhancement of the neuromuscular block (postjunctional effects) and in TOF fade (prejunctional effects). METHODS: Twenty ASA I-II adult patients were randomly allocated to maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 2%) or propofol. Neuromuscular block was assessed by acceleromyography and a single dose of mivacurium (0.15 mg kg(-1)) was administered (in the sevoflurane group after 30 min of exposure to sevoflurane). We measured time for recovery of the first twitch of the TOF (T1) from 25-75%, time from 25% recovery of T1 to achieving a TOF ratio (TOFR) of 0.8, TOFR at 50%, 75% and 90% recovery of T1, and height of T1 at TOFR of 0.7 and 0.9. Data were tested using t-test for independent samples. RESULTS: Recovery times (mean (95% confidence interval, CI)) of mivacurium in the sevoflurane group (T1 25-75%, 11.3 (8.1-14.5) min; T1 25%-TOFR0.8, 19.1 (15.7-22.5) min) were significantly longer (P < 0.05) than in the propofol group (T1 25-75%, 6.5 (5.2-7.7) min; T1 25%-TOFR0.8, 11.3 (7.8-10.3) min). No differences were found in the relations between TOFR and T1 or vice versa, between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery times after a single dose of mivacurium were prolonged by sevoflurane compared with propofol but no differences in TOF fade were observed between the two anaesthetics.
Adult↗
A review of recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia: comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than isoflurane and thus should be associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia. METHODS: A review and meta-analysis were employed to examine the recovery profiles of adult patients following anaesthesia, comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane and sevoflurane to propofol. RESULTS: There were significant differences in times to several recovery events that favoured sevoflurane to isoflurane anaesthesia, including time to emergence, response to commands, extubation, and orientation. Likewise, there were significant differences in times to the same recovery events following anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus propofol. There were no differences in time to recovery room discharge when comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane or propofol. CONCLUSION: The observed differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia support the postulate that the use of sevoflurane is associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia than either isoflurane or propofol.
Adult↗
Microvascular changes during anesthesia: sevoflurane compared with propofol.
BACKGROUND: We have developed a non-invasive computer-assisted venous congestion plethysmograph to measure the microvascular parameters in the lower limbs. This enables the assessment of microvascular changes following the induction of standardized anesthesia with either sevoflurane or propofol. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial we measured the capillary filtration coefficient (CFC), isovolumetric venous pressure (Pvi), an index of the balance of Starling forces, and limb blood flow 24 h preoperatively, immediately after induction of anesthesia and on the 1st and 2nd postoperative day. Anesthesia was maintained with either 1.0% sevoflurane and 5 microg/kg/h remifentanil or propofol (3 mg/kg/h), and 5 microg/kg/h remifentanil in 20 female patients undergoing breast surgery. RESULTS: Preoperatively we found no significant differences between the mean CFC values of the sevoflurane group (3.7+/-0.3 ml/min 100 ml tissue/mmHg x 10-3=CFCU) and the propofol group (3.5+/-0.3 CFCU). In the sevoflurane group CFC decreased significantly to 2.9+/-0.2 CFCU, whereas it was unchanged in the propofol group. Both groups revealed a significant reduction in Pvi during steady-state anesthesia. Limb blood flow remained unchanged. There was an overall significant positive correlation between the perioperative fluid substitution and the difference between the preoperative and intraoperative CFC values (r = 0.64, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The decreased CFC in response to sevoflurane may result in less extravasation of fluids into the interstitial space, thereby reducing intraoperative fluid requirements. These data suggest that sevoflurane may be the preferred anesthetic agent in subjects susceptible to large intraoperative fluid shifts.
Adult↗
The use of nitrous oxide in anaesthetic practice: a questionnaire survey.
Where practicable, exposure to a hazardous substance should be eliminated or adequately controlled. A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 10% of consultants from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, to identify the level of use of nitrous oxide in current anaesthetic practice and identify any change of practice over the last 5 years. Details of anaesthetic practice were requested in three areas: nitrous oxide usage, availability of medical air on anaesthetic machines and the use of total intravenous anaesthesia. Replies were received from 320 consultants (75%). Of these, 49% felt that, over the last 5 years, their use of nitrous oxide had decreased. Twenty per cent of anaesthetists felt that there should be some restriction in availability of nitrous oxide. Where medical air was available, 32% felt that they would use it frequently. A total of 263 (83%) stated that they use total intravenous anaesthesia to some extent. The results showed that, although 49% of consultant anaesthetists had reduced their use of nitrous oxide, this was due to medical considerations rather than concerns over health and pollution issues arising from the use of nitrous oxide.
Air Pollutants, Occupational↗
Seizures on emergence from sevoflurane anaesthesia for Caesarean section in a healthy parturient.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗