PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Optics and Refraction”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 847 records · Page 47Linked to original sources

Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.

BACKGROUND: Although peripheral resolution acuity is relatively unaffected by uncorrected refractive error, recent investigations of peripheral vision indicate that contrast detection is optically limited. It should be possible, therefore, to perform a subjective refraction in the peripheral visual field using a contrast detection task. METHODS: For a range of trial lenses, contrast detection acuities for vertical and horizontal gratings were measured with a two-interval forced-choice paradigm. Lens powers that maximized detection acuity were taken as the subjective refraction estimates. These powers were compared with objective refractions determined with retinoscopy and autorefractometry. RESULTS: Contrast detection acuity varied significantly with lens power at all retinal locations tested. Defocusing by one diopter from the optimum lens power reduced detection acuity by about a factor of two at 20 degrees eccentricity, and slightly less in the far periphery. Objective retinoscopy and autorefractometry agreed with subjective measurements for most conditions tested. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast detection acuity in the peripheral visual field varies with refractive blur, demonstrating the feasibility of performing subjective refraction in the periphery for a contrast detection task. Results suggest that visual fields measured with standard perimetry, which is based on contrast detection, may be affected by uncorrected peripheral refractive errors.

Adult↗

Image evaluation of ophthalmic devices.

Methods used in the ophthalmic industry to evaluate the optical image quality of correcting lenses have remained the same over many years. This is especially true for single-vision ophthalmic lenses. With the development of new optical designs and materials for correcting refractive errors and presbyopia, new procedures for evaluating lens performance are being explored. One such method is the measurement of the modulation transfer function. Over the last 2 years, we have been measuring modulation transfer functions on a variety of single-vision and bifocal contact lenses, progressive addition spectacle lenses, holographic-diffractive lenses, and intraocular lenses. In this article, the modulation transfer function procedure and its application and results from one study on safety goggles will be presented and discussed.

Eye Protective Devices↗

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with high axial myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with high axial myopia. SETTINGS: Department of Ophthalmology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 125 Chinese patients with high myopia and axial lengths (ALs) longer than 25.0 mm who had cataract surgery during the year 2000. Eyes with pathology or operative complications affecting the refractive status and those with missing data were excluded. In each case, the power of the implanted IOL was used to calculate the predicted postoperative refractive error by 4 IOL power calculation formulas: SRK II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, and Hoffer Q. The predictive accuracy of the formulas was analyzed by comparing the difference between the "actual" and "predicted" postoperative refractive errors. The Student t test was used for statistical analysis. The performance of the formulas in subcategories of long AL was also tested. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five eyes (110 patients) were studied. Thirty-seven eyes (29.6%) were excluded. The Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas showed a slight tendency toward resultant hyperopia, with a mean of +0.36 diopters (D), +0.53 D, and +0.74 D, respectively. The SRK II caused the largest hyperopic error, with a mean of +1.47 D. All 4 formulas caused a refractive error shift toward myopia in the subcategories of AL >28.0 mm, minus-power IOL, and extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). CONCLUSIONS: In Chinese eyes with high axial myopia with an AL longer than 25.0 mm, the 4 formulas caused a slight postoperative hyperopic refractive error that was less in eyes with a minus-power IOL or an AL longer than 28.0 mm and in those that had ECCE. The Hoffer Q formula provided the best predictive result, and Holladay 1 and SRK/T were comparable in IOL power calculation. The SRK II was the least accurate in all subgroups.

Adult↗

Generic method for aero-optic evaluations.

The effect of aerodynamic flow on the performance of an airborne optical system is becoming a critical issue in the development of electro-optic systems. A novel technique for aero-optic calculations that is based on commercially available software is presented. The optically relevant data from the computational fluid dynamics results are transformed into an index-of-refraction field and introduced as an input to the optical code. The data do not necessarily have to be presented in analytical form; instead it is introduced in a most general form as a discrete set of values located at a nonuniform grid of points. The modified quadratic Shepard method has been adopted for data interpolation, enabling a simple interface with virtually any software output. Several numerical simulations that demonstrate the technique are presented.

Journal Article↗

The extent to which compensation for the prismatic effects of spectacle lenses is maintained.

PURPOSE: The ability of subjects to compensate for the visual displacement caused by the prismatic effects of spectacle lenses was studied over 4 days. METHODS: Subjects were made myopic using contact lenses and then corrected with spectacles. Pointing behavior was used to assess directional localization. Compensation for the refractive lenses was induced by showing subjects their pointing errors. RESULTS: Compensation was maintained for 4 days in 3 of 4 subjects despite 24 h of normal viewing between testing sessions. One subject demonstrated a negative directional aftereffect which has not been previously reported in studies of spectacle lens adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: Compensation for the prismatic effects of spectacle lenses can be maintained for several days in some subjects. This compensation may be functionally useful for some patients who switch between spectacles and contact lenses.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Regression curves for the optical parameters of the eye.

Based on the data collected by Stenstrom (1948), the regression curves involving refractive error and axial length are examined. The regression of refractive error on axial length is shown to be nonlinear; it curves upward at low axial lengths and downward at high axial lengths. It is shown that this curve can be partially accounted for by the lack of compensating corneal changes for extreme values of the axial length. On the other hand, the regression of axial length on refractive error, is shown to be approximately linear. The slope of this regression is related to a formula derived from geometrical optics.

Cornea↗

[Calculation for emmetropic intraocular lenses in hypermetropia].

Authors evaluated postoperative refractive errors after implantation of intraocular lens at the set of 429 eyes. There predominated eyes with short axial length (AL) at this set: 304 eyes had AL < 22 mm, average AL was 21.54 mm. The basic point was to correct the linearity of SRK formula by different way from SRK II formula, while keeping the new formula simple to use. Authors reached following modification of A-constant in SRK formula: new A-constant = original A-constant + C, where C = 0,146*AL2 - 7,702*AL + 100,130.

Humans↗

[Multifocal intraocular lenses as an alternative in cataract surgery].

The development and introduction of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL) should provide the patient with a pseudoaccomodation for distance and near acuity without spectacle corrections. For this study two different types of multifocal lenses have been investigated concerning their visual properties. For diffractive MIOL (3M, type 815LE) an uncorrected distance visual acuity of Snellen 0.59 +/- 0.17 was found. The near visual acuity was J 2.4 +/- 0.94 and Snellen Acuity of 0.5 was achieved in a range of defocus of -1.25 D to +4.0 D. For refractive MIOL (Allergan, type Array SSM 26NB) an uncorrected distance visual acuity of Snellen 0.79 +/- 0.17 was found. The near visual acuity was J 2.75 +/- 1.35 and Snellen Acuity of 0.5 was achieved in a range of defocus of -1.0 D to +3.5 D. With this multifocal lenses the patients reached functional results for distance vision as well as with monofocals. Because of the existing pseudo-accommodation the results for near vision lay over of those of monofocals and the need spectacle correction decrease.

Aged↗

Theoretical versus SRK I and SRK II calculation of intraocular lens power.

The predictability of a theoretical, computerized (PC-assisted) intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation method and of the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff [SRK] I and II methods was evaluated from preoperative and postoperative biometry in 202 cataractous patients who had extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). The theoretical method resulted in the lowest range and standard deviation of the error, and the highest correlation coefficient between the observed and the predicted refraction (P less than .05). The superiority of the theoretical approach was most clearly demonstrated when the postoperative measurements were used in the predictions (P less than .001). This demonstrated the potential accuracy of the formula used and the importance of incorporating methods to predict the IOL position after surgery. If the prediction of the IOL chamber depth was properly corrected for the axial length dependence, a high prediction accuracy could be obtained in short as well as in long eyes.

Adult↗

Residual astigmatism and visual acuity with hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study.

Residual astigmatism, visual acuity, and transferred corneal toricity were measured in a double masked fashion on 24 randomly selected patients fitted with Buasch and Lomb Soflens contact lenses, the Hydrocurve II contact lenses, and the AOSoftTM hydrophillic contact lenses. None of the subjects had any contraindications to hydrogel lens wear. All three lens types produced a small but similar reduction in refractive astigmatism. However, because of residual astigmatism, fewer eyes achieved 20/20 or better visual acuity with each of the hydrogel lens types than with the best spectacle correction. Corneal toricity was found to be transferred to the front surface of all three lens types. Our findings indicate that generally these three types of hydrogel lenses result in similar residual astigmatism, visual acuity and transferred corneal toricity. However, individual differences may occur. Therefore, the choice of lens type should be based on the individual patient's response to various lens types.

Adult↗

Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye.

We have developed a lightweight plastic goggle with rigid contact lens inserts that can be applied to the eyes of newly hatched chicks to explore the range and accuracy of the developmental mechanism that responds to retinal defocus. Convex and concave lenses of 5, 10, 15, 20 and +30 D were applied to one eye on the day of hatching. The chick eye responds accurately to defocus between -10 and +15 D, although hyperopia develops more rapidly than myopia. Beyond this range there is first a levelling off of the response and then a decrease. The resulting refractive errors are caused mainly by increases and decreases in axial length, although high levels of hyperopia are associated with corneal flattening. If +/- 10 D defocusing lenses are applied nine days after hatching the resulting myopia and hyperopia are equal to about 80% of the inducing power. After one week of inducing myopia and hyperopia with +/- 10 D lenses, the inducing lenses were reversed. In this case, the refractive error did not reach the power of the second lens after another week of wear. Instead, astigmatism in varying amounts (0-12 D) was produced, being greater when reversal was from plus to minus. Finally, astigmatism can also be produced by applying 9 D toric inducing lenses on the day of hatching. The astigmatism produced varies from 2 to 6 D, and the most myopic meridian coincides with the power meridian of the inducing lens. This astigmatism appears to be primarily due to corneal toricity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Risk of glaucoma in ocular hypertension with and without pseudoexfoliation.

PURPOSE: To compare glaucoma conversion rates in patients with ocular hypertension (OH) with and without pseudoexfoliation. DESIGN: Cohort study, based on 32,918 screening participants. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Ninety-eight patients with OH and pseudoexfoliation and 98 matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perimetric glaucoma conversion. METHODS: A population-based glaucoma screening of elderly citizens of Malmö, Sweden, was conducted between 1992 and 1997 to recruit participants for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Screening participants with intraocular pressure (IOP) between 24 and 32 mmHg and pseudoexfoliation were compared to controls among other screening participants without pseudoexfoliation but matched for baseline IOP, age, and gender, and the 2 groups were invited to a reexamination. Computerized visual field tests were performed to identify persons with manifest glaucoma. Visual acuity, refraction, IOP, and central corneal thickness were also measured. RESULTS: After a mean of 8.7 years (range: 6.3-11.4), 54 of 98 patients (55.1%) with pseudoexfoliation at the baseline examination and 27 of 98 patients (27.6%) without pseudoexfoliation had developed glaucoma. The risk ratio was 2.0 (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The glaucoma conversion rate was twice as high in patients with OH and pseudoexfoliation as in control patients matched for IOP, age, and gender. Thus, pseudoexfoliation was a strong independent risk factor for glaucoma in patients with OH.

Aged↗

[Refractive phakic IOLs: three different models and contact with the crystalline lens. An AC-OCT study].

Three patients received three different models of phakic implants. With the usual slit-lamp examination method, we were not able to establish whether there was contact between the implants and the natural crystalline lens. Using the anterior chamber optical coherence tomography scanner (AC-OCT), we were able to demonstrate that there was direct contact between the natural crystalline lens and the three different phakic implants. A dynamic study of these contacts was carried out during accommodation. These observations show that examination of the anterior segment with the optical coherence tomography scanner is essential in refractive surgery.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Correction of subtle refractive error in aviators.

Optimal visual acuity is a requirement for piloting aircraft in military and civilian settings. While acuity can be corrected with glasses, spectacle wear can limit or even prohibit use of certain devices such as night vision goggles, helmet mounted displays, and/or chemical protective masks. Although current Army policy is directed toward selection of pilots who do not require spectacle correction for acceptable vision, refractive error can become manifest over time, making optical correction necessary. In such cases, contact lenses have been used quite successfully. Another approach is to neglect small amounts of refractive error, provided that vision is at least 20/20 without correction. This report describes visual findings in an aviator who was fitted with a contact lens to correct moderate astigmatism in one eye, while the other eye, with lesser refractive error, was left uncorrected. Advanced methods of testing visual resolution, including high and low contrast visual acuity and small letter contrast sensitivity, were used to compare vision achieved with full spectacle correction to that attained with the habitual, contact lens correction. Although the patient was pleased with his habitual correction, vision was significantly better with full spectacle correction, particularly on the small letter contrast test. Implications of these findings are considered.

Adult↗

Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pseudophakic accommodation effect in dual and mono optic translation accommodative intraocular lenses (AIOL) using linear matrix methods in the paraxial space. METHODS: Dual (anterior optic of power +32 D linked to a compensatory posterior optic of negative power) and mono lens power was determined in the non-accommodated state using linear geometric optics based on the Gullstrand model eye. The position of the AIOL was calculated from a regression formula. Pseudophakic accommodation was assessed with three systems: (1) forward shift of the mono optic lens, (2) anterior translation of the anterior optic in the dual optic lens system with an unchanged position of the posterior minus lens and (3) symmetrical anterior and posterior translation of the anterior and posterior lens. The Gullstrand model eye was modified by changing the axial length (and proportionally changing the phakic anterior chamber depth) to investigate the accommodative effect in myopic and hyperopic eyes. RESULTS: The dual optic lens system (2) yields a nearly constant accommodation amplitude of 2.4-2.5 D mm(-1) movement over the total range of axial lengths. The mono optic lens (1) provides a higher accommodative effect only in extremely short eyes (high refractive power of the lens), whereas for normal eyes (1.4-1.5 D mm(-1) movement) and for long (myopic) eyes the accommodative effect is much less than the dual optic lens. The dual optic lens system under condition (3) yields less accommodation amplitude compared with the dual optic system under condition (2) over the total range of axial length but provides higher accommodation amplitude compared with the mono optic lens system (1) with axial lengths greater than 22.3 mm (lens power 25.5 D). In the accommodated state, with lens translation of 1 mm, the absolute value of the lateral magnification increases with the refractive power of the mono optic lens (1) and decreases in both dual optic lens systems (under conditions 2 and 3). CONCLUSIONS: A mathematical strategy is presented for calculation of the accommodative effect of mono-optic and dual optic AIOL. The dual optic lens yielded a nearly constant accommodation amplitude of about 2.4-2.5 D mm(-1) translation, whereas the mono optic lens yielded an accommodative response of <2 D mm(-1) translation in long myopic or normal eyes. Only in extremely short eyes is the accommodative amplitude of the mono-optic lens higher than the dual optic lens.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

The effect of UV irradiation on uracil thin layer measured by optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy.

The polycrystalline uracil thin-layer dosimeter is a well-established method to monitor the biological effects of the environmental ultraviolet (UV) radiation. It is based on the optical density (OD) decrease of the uracil layer in the UV absorption band due to photodimerization of the crystal caused by UV irradiation. In the present study, we report measurements made with optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy (OWLS) to characterize the changes in the optogeometrical parameters of the uracil layer caused by an artificial UV source. It is shown that UV irradiation causes a decrease in the refractive index and an increase of the optical anisotropy. The determined kinetic parameters of the UV dose-sensor response curves correlate well with results of OD measurements, but the sensitivity of OWLS is about ten times higher. The results show that OWLS is capable of analyzing the UV response of the uracil layer and opens the way for dosimetrical applications.

Biosensing Techniques↗

An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction.

Although available empirically derived and theoretical formulas perform adequately for eyes of average axial length, both have been shown to be deficient for eyes that have unusually short and long axial lengths. I developed a formula based on a theoretical model eye in which anterior chamber depth is related to axial length and keratometry. A relationship between the A-constant and a "lens factor" is also used to determine anterior chamber depth. The location of the intraocular lens' principle planes of refraction is retained as a relevant variable in the formula, and the user need not know the material and construction of the lens and or its constant. I compared the new formula with the SRK II, Holladay, and SRK/T formulas in a group of 100 unselected patients and in selected subgroups of patients with average, short, and long axial lengths. The new formula was significantly more accurate than the other third-generation formulas and maintained its accuracy in the subgroups. The formula can be described as universal because it can be used for different lens styles and for eyes with short, medium, and long axial lengths.

Anterior Chamber↗

Biometric aspects of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

A retrospective biometric study was done on 132 patients with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. The two principal focal points induced by the intraocular lens were refracted for distance in each patient. The difference in diopters between the refractions was obtained, and the A constant (SRK formula series) and anterior chamber depth (ACD, Binkhorst formula) were calculated. Our results showed the A constant was 116.46. This value was consistent and not affected by the axial length of the eye in the 22mm to 24.5mm range. In patients who had emmetropia with the intraocular lens power implanted alone, the constant was equal to 116.3. The ACD was 3.94mm. This value was lower in shorter eyes and higher than 3.94mm in longer eyes. On the basis of the data obtained, when the SRK-II formula is used, an A constant of 116.4 should be used in preoperative biometric calculations.

Anthropometry↗