PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, Inhalation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Nitrous oxide reduces the cost of intravenous anaesthesia.

One hundred and one women (ASA grades I and II) were anaesthetized for routine gynaecological surgery using an intravenous (i.v.) anaesthetic technique combining propofol and alfentanil. The patients were allocated randomly into groups. Group one received 33% oxygen in nitrous oxide and group two received 33% oxygen in air (total i.v. anaesthesia). The group receiving nitrous oxide required significantly less (P < 0.05) of the propofol and alfentanil mixture to maintain anaesthesia and this was found to reduce the mean cost of anaesthesia by 1.70 pounds, (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. We suggest that nitrous oxide may be used to reduce the cost of total i.v. anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil without causing any increase in post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing routine gynaecological surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

General versus regional anaesthesia for cataract surgery: effects on neutrophil apoptosis and the postoperative pro-inflammatory state.

At clinically relevant concentrations, volatile anaesthetic agents influence neutrophil function. Our hypothesis was that sevoflurane would inhibit neutrophil apoptosis and consequently influence the postoperative pro-inflammatory state. In order to identify selectively the effect of the anaesthetic agent sevoflurane, we studied patients undergoing minimally stimulating (cataract) surgery randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane (n = 11) or local anaesthesia (n = 12). Venous blood samples were taken immediately prior to anaesthesia and at 1, 8 and 24 h thereafter. The rate of neutrophil apoptosis, plasma concentration of cytokines and differential white cell count were measured. The rates of neutrophil apoptosis and plasma concentrations of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha and IL-8 at each time point were similar in the two groups. IL-6 concentrations increased significantly and to a similar extent compared to preanaesthetic levels at 8 and 24 h. This study demonstrates that sevoflurane does not influence the rate of neutrophil apoptosis, cytokine concentrations and neutrophil count following cataract surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Propofol as a sole agent for paediatric day care diagnostic ophthalmic procedures: comparison with halothane anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the feasibility of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in spontaneously breathing children undergoing ophthalmic procedures. METHODS: Fifty-five children (aged 6 months to 5 years) were randomly allocated to receive either propofol bolus (until loss of eyelash reflex) followed by infusion [group P (n=29)] or halothane 3-4% for induction, followed by 1-2% in 70% nitrous oxide and oxygen via face mask [group H (n=28)]. Dose for induction and maintenance, intraoperative adverse events, time to recovery (on an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, 5 at each level) and duration of procedure were recorded. All children in both groups, were anaesthetized successfully. RESULTS: 4.0 +/- 0.7 mg x kg(-1) and 5.1 +/- 1.0 mg x kg(-1) of propofol were required for loss of eyelash reflex and tolerance of the ophthalmic speculum, respectively. An infusion rate of 8.3 +/- 1.7 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) was needed for maintenance of anaesthesia; 3.4 +/- 0.5%, 3.6 +/- 0.4% and 1.4 +/- 0.4% halothane was needed for induction, tolerance of the eye speculum and maintenance of anaesthesia, respectively. Induction and recovery were significantly faster with halothane compared with propofol [induction - 38.3 +/- 6.6 s (group H)/60.9 +/- 15.2 s (group P) (P < 0.001); recovery 12.8 +/- 4.6 min (group H)/27.0 +/- 23.3 min (group P) (P < 0.001)]. Apnoea, coughing and breath-holding were seen only in group H. Group P had significantly higher incidence of involuntary movements (minor degree) (n=6) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is a feasible option for paediatric diagnostic ophthalmic procedures with the advantage over halothane of providing complete access to the eye.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2006

Myocardial damage prevented by volatile anesthetics: a multicenter randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of volatile anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia on cardiac troponin release in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). DESIGN: The authors performed a multicenter randomized controlled study to compare cardiac troponin release in patients receiving either volatile anesthetics or total intravenous anesthesia for cardiac surgery on the beating heart, which is an excellent model of human myocardial ischemia. SETTING: Three university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: The authors randomly assigned 57 patients to desflurane (volatile anesthetic) and 55 patients to propofol (intravenous anesthetic) in addition to an opiate-based anesthesia for OPCAB. INTERVENTIONS: The 2 groups of patients received either desflurane (volatile anesthetic) or propofol in addition to an opiate-based anesthesia for OPCAB. Peak postoperative troponin I release was measured as a marker of myocardial necrosis. Prolonged hospitalization was considered as a secondary outcome. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient mean age was 69 years, and 82% were men. There was a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in postoperative median (25th-75th percentiles) peak of troponin I in patients receiving volatile anesthetics, 1.2 (0.9-1.9) ng/dL, compared with patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia, 2.7 (2.1-4.0) ng/dL. This myocardial protection resulted in a reduced (p = 0.04) number (percentage) of patients requiring postoperative inotropes, 20 (35%) versus 31 (56%), and a reduced number (percentage) of patients submitted to prolonged hospitalization (> or =7 days), 7 (12%) versus 20 (36%) in the 2 groups (p = 0.005). One patient receiving total intravenous anesthesia died within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial damage measured by cardiac troponin release could be reduced by volatile anesthetics during OPCAB. Because patients underwent cardiac surgery on the beating heart, these results could have implications for cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

A multicentre comparison of the costs of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol.

Day-case anaesthesia requires rapidly eliminated anaesthetics which are relatively expensive. This multinational, multicentre European study assessed the relative costs of propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia in 211 patients. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol in group 1, with propofol and sevoflurane in group 2, and with sevoflurane in group 3. Drug and delivery costs were calculated in US$. Induction of anaesthesia was fastest in groups 1 and 2, although spontaneous ventilation resumed earliest in group 3. Emergence times and times at which patients were fit for discharge were similar in all groups. Group 2 had the lowest costs based on actual drug use (mean $14.2 (SEM 0.8) vs $18.7 (0.8) and $17.3 (0.8) in groups 1 and 3, respectively). Anaesthetic drug wastage and disposable costs were highest in group 1 and lowest in group 3. Consequently, total costs were highest in group 1 ($31.9 (0.9)) compared with groups 2 ($19.7 (0.9)) and 3 ($18.8 (0.9)). Although we observed increased nausea and vomiting in groups 2 and 3 and reduced patient satisfaction in group 3, these differences should be balanced against the greater cost of propofol anaesthesia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Changes in anesthetic sensitivity and glutamate receptors in the aging canine brain.

This study investigated whether the aging process in dogs is associated with an increased sensitivity to inhalation anesthesia and whether age-related changes in glutamate receptors are related to the increased sensitivity. The mean minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane was 1.82 +/- .08% for 2-3 year olds and 1.45 +/- .06% for 11 years olds, indicating that there was an increased potency of isoflurane in the older dogs as compared to the young. These older animals also showed a significant decrease in binding of [3H]glutamate and [3H]dizocilpine ([3H]MK801) to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in multiple cortical and hippocampal regions. The density of binding to NMDA receptors in the cortex, using a single concentration of ligand, correlated significantly with individual MAC values. These results demonstrate that dogs experience an increase in anesthetic potency with increased age, similar to humans, and that age-related changes in the NMDA receptor may represent one mechanism underlying this increased sensitivity to anesthesia.

Aging↗
PubMed1995

Use of sevoflurane during elective cesarean birth: a comparison with isoflurane and spinal anesthesia.

This randomized study compared sevoflurane 1% and isoflurane 0.5% in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes. In addition, neonatal outcome in both groups was compared with a cohort of patients delivered by cesarean birth using spinal anesthesia. Fifty-five patients presenting for elective cesarean birth under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either sevoflurane 1% or isoflurane 0.5% in a 50% nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture for maintenance. Twenty patients requesting regional anesthesia received a subarachnoid block using 1.5 mL bupivacaine 0.75% in 8.25% dextrose with fentanyl 10 micrograms. Intraoperative hemodynamic variables and perioperative adverse events were recorded. Neonatal data included Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, umbilical artery gas analysis, neurologic adaptive capacity scores (NACS) at 2 and 24 h, and a modified neonatal behavioral assessment scale (NBAS) at 24 h. Sevoflurane and isoflurane at equianesthetic concentrations (0.46 MAC-h [minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration hours]) were associated with similar blood pressure and heart rate changes during the operation. Blood loss, uterine tone, and perioperative complications were not problematic and were similar with the two drugs. No differences were seen in emergence times or in the time to being judged fit for discharge from the recovery room. Similarly, the level of postoperative comfort was the same in both groups. Comparing the general and the spinal anesthetic groups, no differences could be detected in neonatal outcome. Fluoride concentrations were modestly increased above preoperative levels in maternal and umbilical blood samples after sevoflurane administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients.

A randomized, prospective study was performed at four institutions to compare anesthetic induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics between sevoflurane- and propofol-based anesthesia in 186 ASA physical status I and 11 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures of 1-3 h. Group 1 (n = 93) patients received sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia while Group 2 (n = 93) received propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation times were significantly shorter with propofol (2.21 +/- 0.2 min, 5.11 +/- 0.3 min, respectively) than with sevoflurane (3.11 +/- 0.2 min, 7.21 +/- 0.3 min, respectively). Emergence times after sevoflurane (8.81 +/- 1.2 min) were significantly shorter than with propofol (13.21 +/- 1.2 min). Overall frequency of complication-free induction, maintenance, and emergence did not differ between the two anesthetic groups. However, side effects involving airway excitement were more prevalent during mask induction with sevoflurane as compared to propofol. Patients in the sevoflurane group were oriented and required postoperative analgesia much earlier than those who received propofol. Both groups were hemodynamically stable throughout the study period. The incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain-discomfort scores were similar between the two groups. Urinary specific gravity decreased in the sevoflurane-treated group while serum creatinine and urinary pH were unchanged from preoperative values in both groups. Sevoflurane compared favorably with propofol when used for anesthesia for elective procedures of 1-3 h duration.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Lidocaine plasma concentrations in pediatric patients after providing airway topical anesthesia from a calibrated device.

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate plasma lidocaine concentrations in infants and children after laryngeal spray using a calibrated device. Twenty-one patients aged 3 to 24 mo requiring laryngoscopy or bronchoscopy were included in the study. Anesthesia was induced via a mask with halothane up to 2% in 100% O2. Lidocaine was administered using a 5% lidocaine spray. For patients weighing less than 10 kg, one spray (8 mg of lidocaine) was administered. For those weighing from 10 to 20 kg, two sprays (16 mg) were given. The dose of lidocaine administered ranged between 0.9 and 2.6 mg/kg. Maximum plasma lidocaine concentration (Cmax) was 1.05 +/- 0.55 micrograms/mL (mean +/- SD; range 0.24-2.29 micrograms/mL). With this procedure, we demonstrated the safety of administering lidocaine to children by laryngeal spraying using a 5% sprayer.

Aerosols↗
PubMed1996

Awakening, clinical recovery, and psychomotor effects after desflurane and propofol anesthesia.

We compared postanesthetic and residual recovery of desflurane versus propofol anesthesia. Twenty volunteers were anesthetized for 1 h at 1-wk intervals with either propofol (induction) plus desflurane (1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration) in O2 (PD), propofol plus desflurane in N2O-O2 (PDN), propofol plus propofol infusion with N2O-O2 (PPN), or desflurane (induction) plus desflurane in O2 (DD). Awakening and clinical recovery were measured. Psychomotor skills (attention, coordination, reactive skills, and memory) were tested before and 1,3,5, and 7 h after anesthesia. Awakening was fastest in Group PDN. At 1 h after anesthesia, the subjects given desflurane for maintenance (PD, PDN, and DD) performed significantly (P < 0.05-0.01) better in several psychomotor tests compared with those whose anesthesia was maintained with propofol (PPN). However, subjects met criteria for home readiness as fast after PPN as after PDN anesthesia (mean times +/- SE until fitness for discharge were 126 +/- 20, 81 +/- 14, 70 +/- 7, and 106 +/- 14 min after PD, PDN, PPN, and DD, respectively). Awakening and early psychomotor recovery for as long as 1 h after anesthesia is faster after desflurane than after propofol, but there was no difference in time to home readiness or in residual effects thereafter between propofol and desflurane with N2O in O2.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Midazolam premedication increases sedation but does not prolong discharge times after brief outpatient general anesthesia for laparoscopic tubal sterilization.

Preoperatively administered midazolam may contribute to postoperative sedation and delayed recovery from brief outpatient general anesthesia, particularly in patients who receive significant postoperative opioid analgesics. We evaluated the effects of midazolam premedication (0.04 mg/kg) on postoperative sedation and recovery times after laparoscopic tubal sterilization (Falope rings) in 30 healthy women in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients received midazolam or saline-placebo intravenously 10 min before anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol, and mivacurium and was maintained with N2O and isoflurane. Sedation was quantified before and after premedication and 15, 30, and 60 min after emergence from anesthesia, using the digit-symbol substitution (DSST) and Trieger dot (TDT) tests. Management of postoperative pain and nausea and discharge criteria were standardized. Groups were similar with respect to age, weight, and duration of surgery and anesthesia. Midazolam was associated with impairment of performance on the TDT and DSST after premedication administration and 15 (TDT and DSST) and 30 (DSST) min after postanesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival. There were no differences in PACU time and time to discharge-readiness. In conclusion, midazolam premedication augments postoperative sedation in this population but does not prolong recovery times.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

The effects of epidural fentanyl on hemodynamic responses during emergence from isoflurane anesthesia and tracheal extubation: a comparison with intravenous fentanyl.

To investigate the effects of epidural fentanyl infusion on hemodynamic responses to recovery of consciousness and tracheal extubation, we studied 50 unpremedicated patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy. All patients underwent epidural catheterization and blind infusion of placebo and study drug. Patients were assigned randomly to three groups: Group I received epidural and intravenous (i.v.) bolus injections and infusion of saline at the rate of 0.2 mL x kg(-1) x h(-1); Group II received an i.v. injection of fentanyl 2 microg/kg for 30 s followed by 25 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1), and Group III received epidural injection and infusion using the same administration regimen as Group II. Anesthesia was induced with and maintained by isoflurane alone in an air-oxygen mixture. The study drug was administered at the start of retroperitoneal suturing. Hemodynamic variables, including systolic and diastolic arterial pressures (SAP and DAP, respectively) and heart rate (HR), were recorded every minute between the start of administration of the study and 5 min after tracheal extubation. During emergence from anesthesia and tracheal extubation, the increases in SAP, DAP, and HR in Groups II and III were significantly diminished (P < 0.05) compared with those in Group I. Arterial pressures, but not HR, were attenuated more significantly in Group III than in Group II during and after tracheal extubation, although the plasma fentanyl concentration was significantly lower (P < 0.01) in Group III (0.64 +/- 0.03 ng/ mL, [mean +/- SD]) than in Group II (1.15 +/- 0.09 ng/mL). The incidence of coughing during and after extubation was also lower with Group III. Suppression of respiratory rate prior to tracheal extubation was similar in the two groups receiving fentanyl. These findings suggest that the significant reduction in arterial pressures responses to tracheal extubation due to epidural fentanyl infusion may arise from more suppression of cough reflex than i.v. fentanyl infusion, which could be provided by the spinal action of epidural fentanyl as well as the supraspinal action.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2000

The effects of plasma fentanyl concentrations on propofol requirement, emergence from anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia in propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: To determine the effects of plasma fentanyl concentrations on intraoperative propofol requirements, emergence from anesthesia, and relief of postoperative pain, we studied 60 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing spine fusion. The patients were randomly assigned to four study groups according to the expected intraoperative plasma fentanyl concentrations. Group I received an infusion of saline, and Groups II, III, and IV received fentanyl infusions to maintain the blood levels at 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 ng/mL, respectively. An infusion rate of propofol was adjusted to keep the mean arterial pressure within 15% of the control value. Inspired nitrous oxide concentrations were maintained at 67%. The following were investigated in each group: 1) an average propofol infusion rate, 2) time to spontaneous eye opening and recovery of orientation (name, date, and place), and 3) total dose of fentanyl used for 24 h after admission to the postanesthetic care unit. Average propofol infusion rates were 10.1 +/- 2.5 (mean +/- SD), 7.5 +/- 1.2, 5.7 +/- 1.1, and 4.9 +/- 1.2 mg. kg(-1). h(-1), in Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Groups receiving fentanyl infusion had significantly smaller infusion rates of propofol (P < 0.01) than the group receiving saline. Among the three fentanyl infusion groups, Group II (P < 0.01) had more than Groups III and IV. The time to spontaneous eye opening and the recovery of orientation were directly related to plasma fentanyl concentrations. The plasma fentanyl levels between Groups III and IV were the same. The total amount of IV patient-controlled analgesia fentanyl during postoperative 24 h increased significantly when the order of plasma fentanyl concentrations was reversed, 913.1 +/- 58.4, 553.4 +/- 129, 222.7 +/- 73.4, and 135.1 +/- 69.5 microg in Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. These results suggest that the addition of fentanyl infusions had ceiling effects that reduce the intraoperative propofol requirements according to the plasma fentanyl concentrations. The ceiling effect was demonstrated in the recovery of consciousness but not in the fentanyl requirements for postoperative analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: The addition of fentanyl, a potent opioid, reduced the intraoperative requirement of propofol, an IV anesthetic, in the order of the plasma fentanyl concentrations. The ceiling effects of fentanyl were demonstrated in the reduction of propofol requirements and recovery of consciousness but not in the fentanyl requirements for postoperative analgesia.

Adult↗