PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Developability”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48Linked to original sources

Early development of the facial nerve in the chick embryo with special reference to the development of the chorda tympani.

The development of the facial nerve from Hamburger and Hamilton stage 17 to stage 28 is described in chick embryos by means of a new immunochemical nerve staining method that uses an antineurofilament protein (NFP) antibody. A postspiracular branch and an unknown transient posterior branch beneath the ostocyst were observed at stage 17. At stage 19, the primordia of the r. palatinus were observed. A prespiracular branch appeared at stage 21, and with the postspiracular nerve, it made a loop encircling the spiracle (spiracular loop). The first primordium of the ramus (r) hyoideus and transient rami (rr) dorsales appeared around stage 23. At stage 25, the chorda tympani was first observed to arise from the ventral end of the spiracular loop. At stage 26, a communicating branch, connexus cum nervo glossopharyngeo, was found along with the vena (v) capitis lateralis. The rr. dorsales seemed to represent the r. supratemporalis in lower animals. The communicating branches around the v. capitis lateralis seemed to correspond to the cutaneous nerve communications between the branchial nerves frequently encountered in Amphibia. It was found that the chorda tympani becomes a prespiracular nerve for the most part in the chick by the reduction of the postspiracular component of the spiracular loop. Thus, the nerve differs markedly from that in other animals, which is postspiracular. This difference explains the different passage of this nerve in the chick as compared with other amniotes.

Animals↗

Effects of prenatal exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields on development in mice: II. Postnatal development and behavior.

To investigate the potential of magnetic fields to act as a behavioral teratogen, pregnant CD1 mice were exposed or sham-exposed for all of gestation to a 50 Hz/20 mT magnetic field. Maturation of offspring was assessed using a range of standard developmental indices (eye opening, pinna detachment, hair coat, tooth eruption, sexual maturity, and weight) and simple reflexive behaviors (air righting, surface righting, forepaw grasp, cliff avoidance, and negative geotaxis). Activity and coordination levels were explored in juvenile and adult mice using an open field arena, a head-dip board, an accelerating Rotarod, and a residential activity wheel. All assessments were carried out without knowledge of exposure condition. Results from 168 sham-exposed mice from 21 litters and from 184 exposed mice from 23 litters were compared using survival analysis techniques and multivariate regression methods. Three possible field-dependent effects were found: Exposed animals performed the air righting reflex earlier (P < 0.01); exposed males (but not females) were significantly lighter in weight (P = 0.008) at 30 days of age; and exposed animals remained on a Rota-rod for less time as juveniles (P = 0.03). Some of these results have not been reported in other studies and may reflect spurious statistical significance, although some effect of magnetic field exposure cannot be ruled out. Overall, these results suggest that prenatal exposure to a 50 Hz magnetic field does not engender any gross impairments in the postnatal development or behavior of mice. This does not preclude such exposure affecting more subtle aspects of behavior.

Animals↗

All animals develop from a blastula: consequences of an undervalued definition for thinking on development.

An early embryo becomes a blastula at the moment that its constituent cells become organised into a simple epithelium. Epithelial folding and compartmentation are essential elements of animal development. All the different cell types--epithelial and other ones--of which a differentiated organism consists differ in their plasmamembrane-cytoskeletal complex but they are assumed to have an identical genome. The hypothesis is put forward that, perhaps, the basic mechanism underlying differentiation can be defined as the generation of cells which have an identical genome but which differ in their plasmamembrane-cytoskeletal complex and which, because of these differences, can engage in differential protein synthesis-physiology.

Animal Population Groups↗