SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “construct validity”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

[An animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder in rats using a shuttle box].

We administered inescapable footshocks (IS) to male Wistar rats in a shuttle box, and after 2 weeks, an avoidance/escape task was performed in the same box. The rats exposed to IS 2 weeks beforehand exhibited PTSD-like bi-directional changes similar to symptoms of "avoidance/ numbing" and "hyperarousal". That is, in the relatively calm period just before the avoidance/escape task, spontaneous locomotor activities decreased. On the other hand, in the stressful situation after starting the task, not only responses to external stimuli but also locomotor activities increased. Thus, the paradigm we have used until now could serve as a useful PTSD model because of its "face validity". To demonstrate the greater validity, we administered paroxetine (PRX), which is effective for PTSD, to rats to examine its chronic effect on our model. We also substituted F344 rats, which are vulnerable to various stressors, for the Wistar rats to investigate the difference between the strains. Two weeks of PRX treatment significantly reduced hyperarousal-like behavior, and its ameliorating effect on avoidance/numbing-like behavior was also significant. F344 showed more significant 'bi-directional changes' than Wistar rats. These findings demonstrate that our paradigm is sufficiently valid for an animal model of PTSD, especially in "predictive validity" and "construct validity."

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Use of goal attainment scaling in brain injury in a rehabilitation hospital.

We report a study of the measurement properties of goal attainment (GA) scaling when used in the rehabilitation of brain injury patients. GA scaling is an individualized measurement technique with mathematical properties allowing for calculation of summary scores with a normal distribution. The present study examined 16 inpatients, 13 of whom had suffered a traumatic brain injury. In addition to GA scaling, standardized measures were employed to address issues such as content validity and construct validity. GA scaling change scores correlated highly (r = 0.81) with clinical judgment of efficacy and modestly with standard performance measures. A high level of inter-rater reliability was found between admission (r = 0.92) and discharge (r = 0.94) scores. GA scaling seems to be a feasible method of evaluating rehabilitation in brain injury patients, with promising measurement properties. The goals set are extremely meaningful to the patient and rehabilitation team, providing valuable feedback throughout the rehabilitation course.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1996

Assessing functional disability and health status of women with fibromyalgia: validation of a Hebrew version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a translated version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) to be used by Hebrew speaking populations. METHODS: We administered the FIQ to 100 women with fibromyalgia (FM). The FIQ measures physical functioning, work status, depression, anxiety, sleep, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well being. All patients were asked about the presence and severity (assessed by visual analog scale) of relevant FM symptoms (pain, fatigue, anxiety, etc.); a count of 18 tender points was conducted by thumb palpation, and tenderness thresholds were assessed by dolorimetry. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Spearman correlations. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of reliability. To assess content validity a cutoff criterion of > or = 25% impairment responses was set to indicate a valid item. Construct validity of the FIQ was evaluated by correlating the physical functioning score as well as the separate items with measures of symptom severity, count of tender points, and tenderness thresholds. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was r = 0.96 for physical functioning, and 0.80-0.96 for other items of FIQ. Internal consistency was alpha = 0.93 at Time 1 and 0.86 at Time 2. Seventeen of 19 items of the FIQ met the > or = 25% criterion. Significant moderate to high correlations were obtained between the FIQ items and severity symptoms, point count, and tenderness threshold. CONCLUSION: The FIQ is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring functional disability and health status in Israeli women with FM.

Disability Evaluation↗

PubMed1996

A functional index in myositis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interrater reliability and the construct validity of a specially constructed functional index and to assess functional status in 23 patients with myositis; and to describe the occurrence, intensity, and distribution of pain in these patients. METHODS: The functional test scored muscle endurance in extremities, neck, and trunk, grip strength, peak expiratory flow, turning in bed, and transferring from lying in bed to sitting. The scores of the different functions were added to create a functional index. The patients' subjective gradings of disability and pain intensity were indicated on a category scale. Blood samples for analyses of muscle enzyme levels were obtained in connection with the functional tests. RESULTS: The interrater reliability of the functional index was high. Grip strength and muscle endurance in shoulder abduction and flexion, hip flexion, and a step test and heel and toe lifting were significantly reduced compared to controls. Peak expiratory flow was lowered in 4 patients. The functional index did not correlate significantly with the laboratory tests, but there was significant correlation between the weakness of the lower extremities and the subjective grading of disability. All patients but one had experienced severe pain during the course of the disease. CONCLUSION: The described functional index has high interrater reliability, but its construct validity and sensitivity as a monitor of response to medication and training need further confirmation.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a semistructured interview for hemiparetic stroke patients to assess the use of their paretic arm and hand (amount of use [AOU]) and quality of movement [QOM]) during activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 5. The following clinimetric properties of the MAL were quantified: internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), test-retest agreement (Bland and Altman method), cross-sectional construct validity (correlation between AOU and QOM and with the Action Research Arm [ARA] test), longitudinal construct validity (correlation of change on the MAL during the intervention with a global change rating [GCR] and with change on the ARA), and responsiveness (effect size). METHODS: Two baseline measurements 2 weeks apart and 1 follow-up measurement immediately after 2 weeks of intensive exercise therapy either with or without immobilization of the unimpaired arm (forced use) were performed in 56 chronic stroke patients. RESULTS: Internal consistency was high (AOU: alpha=0.88; QOM: alpha=0.91). The limits of agreement were -0.70 to 0.85 and -0.61 to 0.71 for AOU and QOM, respectively. The correlation with the ARA score (Spearman rho) was 0.63 (AOU and QOM). However, the improvement on the MAL during the intervention was only weakly related to the GCR and to the improvement on the ARA, Spearman rho was between 0.16 and 0.22. The responsiveness ratio was 1.9 (AOU) and 2.0 (QOM). CONCLUSIONS: The MAL is internally consistent and relatively stable in chronic stroke patients not undergoing an intervention. The cross-sectional construct validity of the MAL is reasonable, but the results raise doubt about its longitudinal construct validity.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2006

The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.

BACKGROUND CONTENT: There are currently a number of generic and disease-specific instruments for assessing complaints of low back pain (LBP). None provide the comprehensive coverage of the wide range of factors that are considered essential in evaluating treatment outcomes. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a comprehensive, disease-specific questionnaire for characterizing complaints of LBP and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints. STUDY DESIGN: A clinical-cohort study of a large, convenience sample of LBP patients. METHODS: We have developed a comprehensive, disease-specific questionnaire for characterizing complaints of LBP and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints. A large group of patients who sought treatment for LBP (n=2539) completed the Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire (LSOQ) before treatment, and at 12 and 24 months after treatment. For each subject and for each evaluation period, scores on six composite measures were derived from the subjects' responses to the questionnaire: a LBP severity score, a leg pain severity score, a functional disability score, a psychological distress score, a physical symptoms score, and a health-care utilization score. These scores were used to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the LSOQ was evaluated by correlating the subject's 12-month scores on each composite measure with the corresponding 24-month scores. Intraclass coefficients of correlation were used. The obtained coefficients of correlation [(a) LBP severity, 0.87; (b) leg pain severity, 0.85; (c) functional disability, 0.87; (d) psychological distress, 0.88; (e) physical symptoms other than pain, 0.82; and (f) health-care utilization, 0.76] indicate good test-retest reliability for the LSOQ. Construct validity was evaluated by correlating scores on the composite measures derived from the LSOQ with scores on measures of the same constructs derived from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey. The coefficients of correlation were relatively high (mostly between .7 and .9), indicating good construct validity. Construct validity was also evaluated by comparing the scores of groups of subjects who were known to differ or not to differ on the composite measures, using multivariate analyses of variance. Significant multivariate and univariate differences were obtained between groups who were expected to differ (ie, surgically and nonsurgically treated patients). No significant differences were found for groups who were not expected to differ (ie, patients with similar diagnosis, but different surgical treatments). Responsiveness was assessed by evaluating differences in the 24-month change scores between improved and unimproved subjects. Large and significant differences were obtained between improved and unimproved subjects for all composite measures derived from the LSOQ. The observed effect sizes ranged from .68 to 1.17 indicating that the LSOQ is highly responsive. CONCLUSION: The LSOQ appears to be acceptable to patients, easy to administer, highly reliable, valid, and responsive. It provides information on demographics, pain severity, functional disability, psychological distress, physical symptoms, health-care utilization, and satisfaction. It should be considered for use in both clinical and research applications as well as regulatory review involving patients with LBP complaints.

Cohort Studies↗

PubMed2000

Assessment of anxiety and depression in young children: support for two separate constructs.

Validated the interrelatedness of depression and anxiety in young children by testing four latent factor models: dual construct, unrelated; dual construct, correlated; single construct; and second-order or higher order analysis to test that depression and anxiety are primary constructs under the higher order factor of general affective distress. Children (N = 86) were ages 6 to 11, with mothers who were HIV-symptomatic or diagnosed with AIDS. Depression and anxiety measures included the Children's Depression Inventory (Kovacs, 1992), selected items from the Dominic-R (Valla, Bergeron, Berube, Gaudet, & St-Georges, 1994), and the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (Reynolds & Richmond, 1985). Structural equation modeling was used to test the models. Model 2 (dual construct, correlated) fit the data better than did Models 1 and 3; results for the higher order model were identical to Model 2, suggesting the higher order model is equivalent to the dual-construct model.

Anxiety Disorders↗

PubMed2004

Assessing pain in patients with severe cerebral palsy: development, reliability, and validity of a pain assessment instrument for cerebral palsy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop the Pain Assessment Instrument for Cerebral Palsy (PAICP) and to study its test-retest reproducibility and construct validity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. SETTING: Homes for severely handicapped. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 164 adults with severe cerebral palsy (CP), caregivers, and physiotherapists, and 9 healthy children. INTERVENTIONS: The PAICP contains drawings of situations, some situations of which usually produce pain. Patients rate the pain associated with each activity using a Faces Pain Scale. Reproducibility and construct validity was assessed in a pilot study with CP patients and healthy children. Construct validity and agreement between the pain scores of the patients and proxies was assessed in 160 patients with severe CP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pain score on the PAICP. RESULTS: The measure showed adequate test-retest reproducibility. A significant difference was found between the mean scores for "painful" and "not painful" situations. We also found moderate agreement between the scores of the patients and proxies for daily activities but only for those activities in which the proxies were personally involved. CONCLUSIONS: The PAICP has adequate test-retest reproducibility and construct validity. It provides an indication of the pain experienced by patients in situations in which proxies are not personally involved and may also be more valid than proxy measures for other situations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Validity of the SF-36 five-item Mental Health Index for major depression in functionally impaired, community-dwelling elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: To examine criterion and construct validity of the five-item Mental Health Index (MHI-5) of the 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) in relation to the presence of major depression in functionally impaired, community-dwelling elderly patients and of eight subsamples defined by cognitive functioning, levels of functional impairment, and proxy report versus self-report. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational. SETTING: Nineteen counties in western New York, West Virginia, and Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand four hundred forty-four functionally impaired, community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who participated in the Medicare Primary and Consumer-Directed Care Demonstration. MEASUREMENTS: MHI-5, Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Major Depressive Episode (MINI-MDE) module. RESULTS: The MHI-5 demonstrated sufficient criterion validity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.837; sensitivity=78.7% and specificity=72.1% using a cutpoint of 59/60) with respect to the presence of depression for the entire sample. A significant correlation between MHI-5 scores and presence of major depression as identified using the MINI-MDE (Spearman correlation=-0.426, P<.001), a strong correlation between the MHI-5 and the SF-36 role emotional scale (Spearman correlation=0.522) and a weak correlation with the SF-36 physical functioning scale (Spearman correlation=0.133) provided evidence for construct validity. Additional evidence is provided by decline in mean MHI-5 score as level of formal education and number of close friends and relatives decreased. All eight subsamples demonstrated similar criterion and construct validity. A Cronbach alpha of 0.794 demonstrated internal consistency reliability. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for adequate criterion and construct validity of the MHI-5 in relation to the presence of major depression among functionally impaired, community-dwelling elderly Medicare patients.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1997

Construction and validation of an anorexia nervosa scale on the MMPI.

The article describes the construction and validation of an anorexia nervosa subscale (ANOR) on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). The female subjects included 42 anorexic patients, 56 normal controls and 56 patient controls. Using an empirical discrimination procedure, 60 items contribute to the total homogeneity of the scale and the Chronbach's alpha is 0.86. The five items common with the Hysteria scale represent the highest number of common items with the main MMPI clinical scales. Crossvalidation findings support the results. Content analyses indicate that the ANOR covers important features of anorexia nervosa like a fear of sexual matters, disturbed social relations, rigidity, a depressed mood, low self esteem and a dissatisfaction with appearance.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1989

Developing and testing the beliefs about caregiving scale.

Four studies were conducted to refine and test a newly developed instrument designed to identify caregivers who are at high risk for providing poor-quality care to a dependent elder in the home: the Beliefs About Caregiving Scale (BACS). The BACS was tested for internal consistency, stability, and construct validity. Results suggest strong evidence for internal consistency and for construct validity using the multitrait method as well as moderate evidence for construct validity using predictive modeling. Although further refinements are required, initial tests suggest that the BACS is potentially useful for both research and clinical applications.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish content, face, concurrent, and the first step of construct validity of a new simulator, the SIMENDO, in order to determine its usefulness for training basic endoscopic skills. METHODS: The validation started with an explanation of the goals, content, and features of the simulator (content validity). Then, participants from eight different medical centers consisting of experts (> or =100 laparoscopic procedures performed) and surgical trainees (<100) were informed of the goals and received a "hands-on tour" of the virtual reality (VR) trainer. Subsequently, they were asked to answer 28 structured questions about the simulator (face validity). Ratings were scored on a scale from 1 (very bad/useless) to 5 (excellent/very useful). Additional comments could be given as well. Furthermore, two experiments were conducted. In experiment 1, aimed at establishing concurrent validity, the training effect of a single-handed hand-eye coordination task in the simulator was compared with a similar task in a conventional box trainer and with the performance of a control group that received no training. In experiment 2 (first step of construct validity), the total score of task time, collisions, and path length of three consecutive runs in the simulator was compared between experts (>100 endoscopic procedures) and novices (no experience). RESULTS: A total of 75 participants (36 expert surgeons and 39 surgical trainees) filled out the questionnaire. Usefulness of tasks, features, and movement realism were scored between a mean value of 3.3 for depth perception and 4.3 for appreciation of training with the instrument. There were no significant differences between the mean values of the scores given by the experts and surgical trainees. In response to statements, 81% considered this VR trainer generally useful for training endoscopic techniques to residents, and 83% agreed that the simulator was useful to train hand-eye coordination. In experiment 1, the training effect for the single-handed task showed no significant difference between the conventional trainer and the VR simulator (concurrent validity). In experiment 2, experts scored significantly better than novices on all parameters used (construct validity). CONCLUSION: Content, face, and concurrent validity of the SIMENDO is established. The simulator is considered useful for training eye-hand coordination for endoscopic surgery. The evaluated task could discriminate between the skills of experienced surgeons and novices, giving the first indication of construct validity.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A reliability and validity study of a previously translated version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). OBJECTIVES: To validate the Turkish version of the RMDQ for use in low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical and epidemiologic research related to low back pain in the Turkish population would be facilitated by the availability of well-established outcome measures. METHODS: A total of 81 outpatients with low back pain, 64 of whom were followed up on a second occasion, were assessed by the RMDQ. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Internal construct validity was assessed by Rasch analysis; external construct validity was assessed by association with pain and spinal movement. Responsiveness was tested by both the nonparametric and parametric effect sizes. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the RMDQ is found to be adequate (>0.85) at both times, with high intraclass correlation coefficient also at both time points. Internal construct validity of the scale is good, indicating a single underlying construct. Expected associations with pain confirm external construct validity. There is little evidence of differential item functioning. The scale is at the ordinal level. Responsiveness of the RMDQ is good and greater than observed change in spinal movement. CONCLUSIONS: The RMDQ is a robust unidimensional ordinal measure, largely free of differential item functioning, which works well in the Turkish population. Nonparametric effect sizes of ordinal scales are found to overestimate or underestimate the true effect size depending on the nature of the scale and the distribution of patients at baseline.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Development of a physical performance and mobility examination.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Physical Performance and Mobility Examination (PPME), an observer-administered, performance-based instrument assessing 6 domains of physical functioning and mobility for hospitalized elderly. DESIGN: Development of a pass-fail and 3-level scoring system and training manuals for the PPME instrument for use in both clinical and research settings. Two patient samples were used to assess construct validity and interrater reliability of the PPME. A third sample was selected to assess the test-retest reliability of the instrument. SETTING/PATIENTS: (1) 146 subjects > or = 65 years of age with impaired mobility admitted to Medical Units of Stanford University Hospital. (2) 352 subjects > or = 65 admitted to acute Medical and Surgical Services of the Palo Alto VA Medical Center. Patient samples were obtained during hospitalization and followed until 3 months post-discharge. To study test-retest reliability, 50 additional patients, whose clinical condition was stable, were selected from both settings. METHODS: An expert panel selected 6 mobility tasks integral to daily life: bed mobility, transfer skills, multiple stands from chair, standing balance, step-up, and ambulation. Tasks were piloted with frail hospitalized subjects for appropriateness and safety. Test-retest and interrater reliability and construct validity were evaluated. Construct validity was tested using the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Geriatric Depression Scale, and modified Medical Outcomes Study Measure of Physical Functioning (MOS-PFR). Two scoring schema were developed for each task: (1) dichotomous pass-fail and (2) 3-level high pass, low pass, and fail. A summary scale was developed for each method of scoring. MAIN RESULTS: High interrater reliability and intrarater reliability were demonstrated for individual tasks. The mean percent agreement (interrater) for each pass/fail task ranged from 96 to 100% and from 90 to 100% for the 3 pairs of raters for each task using the 3-level scoring. Kappas for individual pairs of raters ranged from .80 to 1.0 for pass-fail scoring and from .75 to 1.0 for 3-level scoring (all P < 0.01). Intraclass correlation coefficients for 3-level scoring by pairs of raters ranged from .66 to 1.0. For summary scales, the mean intraclass correlation was .99 for both scoring schema. Test-retest reliability for summary scales using kappa coefficients was .99 for both pass-fail and 3-level scoring, and .99 and .98, respectively, using Pearson Product Moment Correlation. Correlations of PPME with other instruments (construct validity) suggest that the PPME adds a unique dimension of mobility beyond that measured by self-reported ADLS and physical functioning, and it is not greatly influenced by mood or mental status (r = 0.70 (ADL), r = 0.43 (IADL), r = 0.36 (MMSE), r = 0.71 (MOS-PFR), r = 0.23 (GDS)). The 3-level summary scale was sensitive to the variability in the patient population and exhibited neither ceiling nor floor effects. CONCLUSIONS: The PPME is a reliable and valid performance-based instrument measuring physical functioning and mobility in hospitalized and frail elderly.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2004

Standardized finger-nose test validity for coordination assessment in an ataxic disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of coordination with the Finger-Nose Test is an essential part of the neurological examination. This study explored the convergent and discriminant construct validity of the Standardized Finger-Nose Test (SFNT) in a neuromuscular disorder with ataxic features. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was carried out with 24 participants with recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay. Convergent construct validity was tested by correlating the SFNT with other upper extremity function tests, a functional independence measure and social participation. Upper extremity function tests included gross and fine dexterity (Box and Block Test and Purdue Pegboard), upper extremity strength (dynamometry) and global upper extremity performance (TEMPA). The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Assessment of Life Habits scale (LIFE-H) measured functional independence and social participation respectively. Discriminant construct validity was explored by comparing performance on the SFNT between two age groups (< 40 years and > or = 40 years). RESULTS: Convergent validity of the SFNT was demonstrated by moderate to strong correlations with gross and fine finger dexterity (r = 0.82-0.84), global upper extremity performance (0.74-0.79), functional independence (r = 0.74) and social participation (r = 0.78). Upper extremity coordination of the older group was significantly lower than in the younger group, suggesting the ability of the SFNT to discriminate between different levels of function. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the convergent and discriminant construct validity of the SFNT in a neuromuscular disorder with ataxic features.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2004

Validation of the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score.

AIMS: To describe the validation and reliability of a new pain tool (the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score, AHTPS) for children at triage in the accident and emergency (A&E) setting. METHODS: A new behavioural observational pain tool was developed because of dissatisfaction with available tools and a lack of confidence in self-assessment scores at triage. The study was conducted in a large paediatric A&E department; 575 children (aged 0-16 years) were included. Inter-rater reliability and various aspects of validity were assessed. In addition this tool was compared to the Wong-Baker self-assessment tool. The children were concurrently scored by a research nurse and triage nurses to assess inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's triage score with the research nurse reassessment score after intervention and/or analgesia. Known group construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's score at triage with the level of pain of the condition as judged by the discharge diagnosis. Predictive validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's AHTPS with the level of analgesia needed by each patient. The AHTPS was also compared to a self-assessment score. RESULTS: A high level of inter-rater reliability, kappa statistic 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.88), was shown. Construct validity was well demonstrated; known group construct validity and predictive validity were also demonstrated to a varying degree. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the use of this observational pain scoring tool in the triage of children in A&E.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Validation of a new method for patient classification, the Oulu Patient Classification.

At Vasa Central Hospital in Western Finland a further development of the Oulu Patient Classification (OPC) has been made by the development of weight coefficients and by estimating the nursing care intensity per nurse. The daily level of nursing care intensity of a ward is expressed by the number of nursing care intensity points per nurse. This article presents results from a validity test of the OPC at Vasa Central Hospital. The test was carried out by comparing the daily patient classifications by means of the OPC against measurements made by means of a new measuring instrument, the 'Professional Assessment of Optimal Nursing Care Intensity Level' (PAONCIL) developed at the Vasa Central Hospital. The study was implemented in eight wards during a period of 3 months. The data material consisted of two parts, the daily patient classifications based on the OPC (n = 19 324) and the measurements by means of the PAONCIL forms (n = 8458). Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were used as statistical methods in quantifying the linear relationship between the two interval-scaled variables. In the test of concurrent validity the coefficient of determination was 0.366, i.e. the association between these two indicators is fairly strong (36.6%). The testing of construct validity showed that the construct validity of the indicator hardly deteriorates as a result of the patients being placed in separate nursing care intensity categories. There was a clear correlation between the scores allotted by the indicator to the six different sub-areas of nursing care. When examining the construct validity of the OPC, no factors with independent explanatory power in predicting PAONCIL values were discovered other than those of the OPC. The OPC proved on the basis of this research material and these statistical methods to possess fairly adequate validity, and thus there is a good basis for further research and a development of nursing care.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2001

The validity of different definitions of radiographic worsening for longitudinal studies of knee osteoarthritis.

Several definitions have been used to characterize radiographic worsening of knee osteoarthritis in longitudinal studies, yet a valid definition with maximal power to detect differences between groups is not known. We used serial radiographs from the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study to compare five dichotomous definitions according to construct validity (strength of association) and discriminant power (power to reject null hypotheses of no difference) for 1) known risk factors for knee osteoarthritis, and 2) development of new knee pain. For risk factors: definitions that included scores for osteophytes (bone spurs) showed good construct validity and discriminant power; a definition using the Kellgren and Lawrence grade of overall knee osteoarthritis was conservative with good construct validity but low discriminant power; a definition based solely on ordinal assessment of joint space narrowing had weak construct validity and low discriminant power. All definitions had comparably strong associations with the development of new knee pain. Similar associations with new knee pain were found when the analysis was confined to either knees with no osteoarthritis at baseline or knees with prevalent osteoarthritis, with increased standard errors for prevalent osteoarthritis. Use of any of these definitions, other than joint space narrowing alone, would permit detection of associations with most known risk factors. Definitions incorporating both osteophytes and joint space narrowing offer the most precise estimation of the association of risk factors with disease worsening.

Aged↗