SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ADAR”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Specific cleavage of hyper-edited dsRNAs.

Extended double-stranded DNA (dsRNA) duplexes can be hyper-edited by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs). Long uninterrupted dsRNA is relatively uncommon in cells, and is frequently associated with infection by DNA or RNA viruses. Moreover, extensive adenosine to inosine editing has been reported for various viruses. A number of cellular antiviral defence strategies are stimulated by dsRNA. An additional mechanism to remove dsRNA from cells may involve hyper-editing of dsRNA by ADARs, followed by targeted cleavage. We describe here a cytoplasmic endonuclease activity that specifically cleaves hyper-edited dsRNA. Cleavage occurs at specific sites consisting of alternating IU and UI base pairs. In contrast, unmodified dsRNA and even deaminated dsRNAs that contain four consecutive IU base pairs are not cleaved. Moreover, dsRNAs in which alternating IU and UI base pairs are replaced by isomorphic GU and UG base pairs are not cleaved. Thus, the cleavage of deaminated dsRNA appears to require an RNA structure that is unique to hyper-edited RNA, providing a molecular target for the disposal of hyper-edited viral RNA.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2003

ADAR2 A-->I editing: site selectivity and editing efficiency are separate events.

ADAR enzymes, adenosine deaminases that act on RNA, form a family of RNA editing enzymes that convert adenosine to inosine within RNA that is completely or largely double-stranded. Site-selective A-->I editing has been detected at specific sites within a few structured pre-mRNAs of metazoans. We have analyzed the editing selectivity of ADAR enzymes and have chosen to study the naturally edited R/G site in the pre-mRNA of the glutamate receptor subunit B (GluR-B). A comparison of editing by ADAR1 and ADAR2 revealed differences in the specificity of editing. Our results show that ADAR2 selectively edits the R/G site, while ADAR1 edits more promiscuously at several other adenosines in the double-stranded stem. To further understand the mechanism of selective ADAR2 editing we have investigated the importance of internal loops in the RNA substrate. We have found that the immediate structure surrounding the editing site is important. A purine opposite to the editing site has a negative effect on both selectivity and efficiency of editing. More distant internal loops in the substrate were found to have minor effects on site selectivity, while efficiency of editing was found to be influenced. Finally, changes in the RNA structure that affected editing did not alter the binding abilities of ADAR2. Overall these findings suggest that binding and catalysis are independent events.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2002

A model for the generation of multiple A to G transitions in the human respiratory syncytial virus genome: predicted RNA secondary structures as substrates for adenosine deaminases that act on RNA.

Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) escape mutants selected with antibodies specific for the attachment (G) protein contain diverse genetic alterations, including point mutations, premature stop codons, frame shift changes and A to G hypermutations. The latter changes have only been found in mutants selected with antibodies directed against the conserved central region of the G protein. This gene segment fulfils substrate requirements for adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs): i.e. it is an A+U rich region of 137 residues, and 98 or 106 of them--for A/Mon/3/88 or Long HRSV strains, respectively--are predicted to form intramolecular base pairs leading to a stable RNA secondary structure. In addition, when sequences of the G gene from natural isolates are compared in terms of pairwise substitutions, A to G+G to A changes are preferentially observed in regions where stable intramolecular dsRNA secondary structures are predicted to occur. In this study, a model is proposed in which, in addition to nucleotide misincorporations, reiterative A to G changes in HRSV are generated by ADAR activity operating in short segments (100-200 ribonucleotide residues) of the HRSV genome with high tendency for intramolecular base pairing.

Adenine↗

PubMed2002

Identification of genes associated with dedifferentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma with expression profiling analysis.

To identify the genes associated with dedifferentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gene expression profiles of HCCs of well-and moderately differentiated grades were compared by means of oligonucleotide arrays. One tumor showed a nodule-in-nodule appearance (NIN), which is occasionally observed in the course of progression of HCC from well to less differentiated grade, when an inner, moderately differentiated tumor (MD) develops sequentially from the outer, well-differentiated tumor (WD). Seventy-six genes were identified to be up-regulated more than 3-fold and 33 genes were down-regulated in the inner nodule in NIN. By statistical analysis of the profiles from 10 individual additional liver tumors, 5 WDs and 5 MDs, we were able to identify 12 genes, LAMA3, PPIB, ADAR, PSMD4, NDUFS8, D9SVA, CCT3, GBAP, ARD1, RDBP, CSRP2, and TLE1, with significantly elevated expression, and 4 genes, CP, IL7R, CD48, and PLGL, with decreased expression in MD. These selected genes were further validated using another 12 tumors, 5 WDs and 7 MDs, with semi-quantitative RT-PCR. We also applied neighborhood analysis to list the genes with high predictability values as most closely correlated with WD-MD distinction. Seven genes, ADAR, PSMD4, D9SVA, CCT3, GBAP, RDBP, and CSRP2, whose expression was elevated and one gene, IL7R, whose expression was decreased, were included among the top 50 predictor genes. These genes are likely to be associated with dedifferentiation of HCC and their identification may help to elucidate the mechanism of liver cancer progression.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

PubMed2003

Nervous system targets of RNA editing identified by comparative genomics.

An unknown number of precursor messenger RNAs undergo genetic recoding by modification of adenosine to inosine, a reaction catalyzed by the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs). Discovery of these edited transcripts has always been serendipitous. Using comparative genomics, we identified a phylogenetic signature of RNA editing. We report the identification and experimental verification of 16 previously unknown ADAR target genes in the fruit fly Drosophila and one in humans-more than the sum total previously reported. All of these genes are involved in rapid electrical and chemical neurotransmission, and many of the edited sites recode conserved and functionally important amino acids. These results point to a pivotal role for RNA editing in nervous system function.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2001

Hepatitis delta virus minimal substrates competent for editing by ADAR1 and ADAR2.

A host-mediated RNA-editing event allows hepatitis delta virus (HDV) to express two essential proteins, the small delta antigen (HDAg-S) and the large delta antigen (HDAg-L), from a single open reading frame. One or several members of the ADAR (adenosine deaminases that act on RNA) family are thought to convert the adenosine to an inosine (I) within the HDAg-S amber codon in antigenomic RNA. As a consequence of replication, the UIG codon is converted to a UGG (tryptophan [W]) codon in the resulting HDAg-L message. Here, we used a novel reporter system to monitor the editing of the HDV amber/W site in the absence of replication. In cultured cells, we observed that both human ADAR1 (hADAR1) and hADAR2 were capable of editing the amber/W site with comparable efficiencies. We also defined the minimal HDV substrate required for hADAR1- and hADAR2-mediated editing. Only 24 nucleotides from the amber/W site were sufficient to enable efficient editing by hADAR1. Hence, the HDV amber/W site represents the smallest ADAR substrate yet identified. In contrast, the minimal substrate competent for hADAR2-mediated editing contained 66 nucleotides.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2004

Identification of new targets of Drosophila pre-mRNA adenosine deaminase.

Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) in Drosophila and mammals has recently become the target of numerous investigations. It is now clear that this protein has a number of functions in the nervous system. Indeed, the mutation of ADAR in Drosophila (dADAR) results in many pathological and physiological changes, such as sensitivity to hypoxia and neuronal degeneration. To understand the full scope of dADAR function, it is crucial to identify new dADAR targets. A polyclonal antibody against inosine was developed and used to enrich inosine-containing mRNAs. The efficiency of immunoaffinity purification was confirmed for the Q/R editing site of GluR-B pre-mRNA that has been edited by ADAR2 to generate inosines at the editing site. This approach was applied to enrich inosine-containing mRNAs from total mRNAs of wild-type and dADAR mutant flies, respectively. The enriched mRNA portion was then amplified and hybridized with Drosophila cDNA arrays. With this method, over 500 mRNAs were identified as potential dADAR targets by showing a higher amount in the enriched mRNA portion from wild-type flies than from dADAR mutant flies. The occurrence of A-to-G conversion in these mRNAs was further analyzed by comparing over 7,000 Drosophila cDNAs sequences with their genomic sequences. A final list of 62 candidates was generated from the overlap of the two approaches. Twelve genes from the final list were further examined by sequencing the RT-PCR products of these genes from wild-type and dADAR mutant flies. Seven of the 12 genes were proven to have A-to-G changes in the wild-type but not in mutant flies. We conclude that the combination of immunoaffinity enrichment of inosine-containing mRNA, DNA microarrays, and sequence comparison could facilitate the discovery of new dADAR substrates, which in turn allows us to better understand the targets of dADAR and the biological function of A-to-I RNA editing in flies.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2006

Dimerization of ADAR2 is mediated by the double-stranded RNA binding domain.

Members of the family of adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) can catalyze the hydrolytic deamination of adenosine to inosine and thereby change the sequence of specific mRNAs with highly double-stranded structures. The ADARs all contain one or more repeats of the double-stranded RNA binding motif (DRBM). By both in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that the DRBMs of rat ADAR2 are necessary and sufficient for dimerization of the enzyme. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) demonstrates that ADAR2 also exists as dimers in living mammalian cells and that mutation of DRBM1 lowers the dimerization affinity while mutation of DRBM2 does not. Nonetheless, the editing efficiency of the GluR2 Q/R site depends on a functional DRBM2. The ADAR2 DRBMs thus serve differential roles in RNA dimerization and GluR2 Q/R editing, and we propose a model for RNA editing that incorporates the new findings.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2005

Molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations of base flipping in dsRNA.

The family of adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) targets adenosines in RNA that is mainly double stranded. Some substrates are promiscuously deaminated whereas others, such as the mammalian glutamate receptor B (gluR-B) pre-mRNA, are more selectively deaminated. Many DNA/RNA-base modification enzymes use a base flipping mechanism to be able to reach their target base and it is believed that ADARs function in a similar way. In this study we used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to describe two sites on the gluR-B pre-mRNA, the selectively targeted R/G site and the nontargeted 46 site, in an attempt to explain the substrate specificity. We used regular MD and also a forced base flipping method with umbrella sampling to calculate the free energy of base opening. Spontaneous opening of the mismatched adenosine was observed for the R/G site but not for the 46 site.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2005

A novel RNA pentaloop fold involved in targeting ADAR2.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) catalyze the site-specific conversion of adenosine to inosine in primary mRNA transcripts, thereby affecting coding potential of mature mRNAs. Structural determinants that define the adenosine moieties for specific ADARs-mediated deaminations are currently unknown. We report the solution structure of the central region of the human R/G stem-loop pre-mRNA, a natural ADAR2 substrate encoding the subunit B of the glutamate receptor (R/G site). The structure reveals that the GCU(A/C)A pentaloop that is conserved in mammals and birds adopts a novel fold. The fold is stabilized by a complex interplay of hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions. We propose that this new pentaloop structure is an important determinant of the R/G site recognition by ADAR2.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2004

Identification of substrates for adenosine deaminases that act on RNA.

Adenosine deaminases that acts on RNA (ADARs) are RNA-editing enzymes that convert adenosine to inosine in double-stranded RNA. This chapter provides a detailed protocol for identifying inosine-containing RNAs. Candidate ADAR substrates are identified by cleaving poly (A)+ RNA specifically after inosine and using differential display to detect cleaved molecules. To confirm the presence of inosine, each individual candidate substrate is amplified by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the PCR product is directly sequenced. Sites that contain inosine at the RNA level appear as a mixture of adenosine and guanosine in the cDNA. The relative peak areas provide an estimate of the extent of editing at each site.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed1995

Hypoxic preconditioning preserves antioxidant reserve in the working rat heart.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine whether intracellular antioxidants play a role in myocardial preservation following hypoxic preconditioning. METHODS: Isolated working rat hearts were subjected to 30 min ischaemia and 30 min reperfusion. Control hearts were compared to hearts preconditioned with 10 min hypoxia. Left ventricular function and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release were measured in each group. Ascorbate dependent (ADAR) and thiol dependent (TDAR) components of the endogenous myocardial antioxidant reserve were assessed using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: a Hypoxic preconditioning had no effect on left ventricular function after 10 min reoxygenation. During reperfusion, the hypoxically preconditioned hearts had a significantly increased survival rate, aortic flow, developed pressure, and dP/dtmax, and a reduced lactate dehydrogenase release, compared to non-preconditioned controls (P < 0.05). Preconditioned hearts also had significantly higher preservation of baseline ADAR (79%) and TDAR (96%) compared with control hearts, (70%) and (77%), respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxic preconditioning enhances functional recovery and reduces cell necrosis following global ischaemia in the working rat heart. This phenomenon may, in part, be mediated through enhanced ascorbate and thiol components of the antioxidant reserve.

Animals↗

PubMed2024

Bioinformatic approaches for accurate assessment of A-to-I editing in complete transcriptomes.

A-to-I RNA editing is an RNA modification that alters the RNA sequence relative to the its genomic blueprint. It is catalyzed by double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase (ADAR) enzymes, and contributes to the complexity and diversification of the proteome. Advancement in the study of A-to-I RNA editing has been facilitated by computational approaches for accurate mapping and quantification of A-to-I RNA editing based on sequencing data. In this chapter we review some of the main computational approaches currently used, describe potential hurdles, challenges and pitfalls, and discuss possible ways to mitigate them.

RNA Editing↗

PubMed2025

A probe-based capture enrichment method for detection of A-to-I editing in low abundance transcripts.

Exactly two decades ago, the ability to use high-throughput RNA sequencing technology to identify sites of editing by ADARs was employed for the first time. Since that time, RNA sequencing has become a standard tool for researchers studying RNA biology and led to the discovery of RNA editing sites present in a multitude of organisms, across tissue types, and in disease. However, transcriptome-wide sequencing is not without limitations. Most notably, RNA sequencing depth of a given transcript is correlated with expression, and sequencing depth impacts the ability to robustly detect RNA editing events. This chapter focuses on a method for enrichment of low-abundance transcripts that can facilitate more efficient sequencing and detection of RNA editing events. An important note is that while we describe aspects of the protocol important for capturing intron-containing transcripts, this probe-based enrichment method could be easily modified to assess editing within any low-abundance transcript. We also provide some perspectives on the current limitations as well as important future directions for expanding this technology to gain more insights into how RNA editing can impact transcript diversity.

RNA Editing↗

PubMed1989

Type I procollagen C-proteinase from mouse fibroblasts. Purification and demonstration of a 55-kDa enhancer glycoprotein.

The enzyme procollagen C-proteinase removes the carboxy-terminal propeptide from procollagen. In the present study we describe an improved procedure for the purification of this enzyme. From the medium of cultured mouse fibroblasts, consisting of ammonium sulfate precipitation, gel filtration and affinity chromatography on a lysyl-Sepharose column, followed by chromatography on a column of Sepharose coupled to the carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PP-Sepharose). This procedure yielded a practically homogeneous, 18,500-fold-purified enzyme preparation and the molecular mass of the purified C-proteinase as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was 80 kDa. The lysyl-Sepharose step separated the enzyme from the majority of the contaminating proteins, including a 55-kDa protein which was further purified by PP-Sepharose chromatography and identified as an additional form of the 36-kDa and 34-kDa procollagen C-proteinase enhancer proteins described before [Adar et al. (1986) Collagen Relat. Res. 6,267-277]. It enhanced the C-proteinase activity, bound to the carboxyl propeptide of type I procollagen, cross-reacted immunologically with the 36-kDa as well as the 34-kDa enhancer proteins, and in common with the latter proteins, it was glycosylated. In the course of PP-Sepharose chromatography, a large proportion of the 55-kDa protein disappeared with the concomitant appearance of the smaller enhancer proteins. All these findings suggest that the 55-kDa protein is a precursor of the low molecular mass enhancer proteins. Also suggested from this study is that lysyl-Sepharose chromatography is a highly beneficial purification step which may find use in the purification of the C-proteinase from other sources as well.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

RNA editing: a molecular mechanism for the fine modulation of neuronal transmission.

The term "RNA editing" is used to identify any mechanism responsible for producing mRNA molecules with sequence information not specifically encoded in the DNA. RNA editing is therefore an important event in gene modification, which takes place at a post-transcriptional level. The molecular mechanism of RNA editing involves site-selective deamination of adenosine to inosine in pre-mRNA, which leads to altering translation codons and splicing in nuclear transcripts, whereby functionally distinct proteins can be produced from a single gene. The mammalian editing enzymes ADARs (adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) are widely expressed in brain and other tissues: however, up until now their substrates have mainly been found in the Central Nervous System (CNS). Of particular relevance in the CNS is the editing occurring at the ionotropic glutamate receptors (GluRs) level. Three AMPA and two Kainate receptors are subject to RNA editing. The consequence of this process is the substitution of specific amino acids in functionally critical positions of the receptors. Depending on the GluR involved, the consequences of editing will involve: activation and/or inhibition of splicing sites; modulation of the trafficking of the receptor to the plasma membrane; the process of tetramerization of the receptor subunits; modification of the ions passage through the receptor channel; modulation of the desensitization and action potential recovery times. All these events are specific to the different GluRs and are genetically and developmentally controlled. RNA editing is therefore a crucial event involved in controlling transmission of the action potential at the postsynaptic level. This modulation involves the transmission of all sensory stimuli to the CNS and gives rise to the "Sensotype". The Sensotype therefore defines the "way" in which the information acquired from the environment by the sensory systems is transmitted to the brain. The signals and inputs deriving from the Sensotype are transmitted to the brain, which processes and stores these signals thus generating the "Brainotype". Brainotype and Sensotype are genetically and environmentally determined; they are individually unique and specific to every living organism with a nervous system. Their characteristics are, at least in part, dependent on the modulation of the "RNA editing" process since glutamate receptors represent the main neurotransmitter system in the CNS.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Reoviruses and the interferon system.

Reovirus induces IFN, and reovirus is sensitive to the antiviral actions of IFN. The characteristics of the IFN-inducing capacity of reovirus, and the antiviral actions of IFN exerted against reovirus, are dependent upon the specific combination of reovirus strain, host cell line, and IFN type. Responses, both IFN induction and IFN action, differ quantitatively if not qualitatively and are dependent upon the virus, cell, and IFN combination. Stable natural dsRNA, identified as the form of nucleic acid that constitutes the reovirus genome, is centrally involved in the function of at least three IFN-induced enzymes. Protein phosphorylation by PKR, RNA editing by the ADAR adenosine deaminase, and RNA degradation by the 2',5'-oligoA pathway all involve dsRNA either as an effector or as a substrate. Considerable evidence implicates PKR as a particularly important contributor to the IFN-induced antiviral state displayed at the level of the single virus-infected cell, where the translation of viral mRNA is often observed to be inhibited following treatment with IFN-alpha/beta. In the whole animal infected with reovirus, elevated cellular immune responses mediated by enhanced expression of MHC class I and class II antigens induced by IFN-alpha/beta or IFN-gamma may contribute significantly to the overall antiviral response.

Animals↗

PubMed2024

Nanopore sequencing to detect A-to-I editing sites.

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, mediated by the ADAR family of enzymes, is pervasive in metazoans and functions as an important mechanism to diversify the proteome and control gene expression. Over the years, there have been multiple efforts to comprehensively map the editing landscape in different organisms and in different disease states. As inosine (I) is recognized largely as guanosine (G) by cellular machineries including the reverse transcriptase, editing sites can be detected as A-to-G changes during sequencing of complementary DNA (cDNA). However, such an approach is indirect and can be confounded by genomic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and DNA mutations. Moreover, past studies rely primarily on the Illumina platform, which generates short sequencing reads that can be challenging to map. Recently, nanopore direct RNA sequencing has emerged as a powerful technology to address the issues. Here, we describe the use of the technology together with deep learning models that we have developed, named Dinopore (Detection of inosine with nanopore sequencing), to interrogate the A-to-I editome of any organism.

Inosine↗