SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Angiography”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate clinical utility, patient outcomes, and costs of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography compared with multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography for initial imaging in the diagnostic work-up of patients with peripheral arterial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Patients referred for diagnostic imaging work-up to evaluate the feasibility of a revascularization procedure were randomly assigned to undergo either MR angiography or CT angiography. Clinical utility was assessed with therapeutic confidence (scale of 0-10) at initial imaging and with the need for additional imaging. Patient outcomes included ankle-brachial index, maximum walking distance, change in clinical status, and health-related quality of life. Actual diagnostic and therapeutic costs were calculated from the hospital perspective. Differences between group means were calculated with unpaired t tests and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 157 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease were prospectively randomized to undergo MR angiography (51 men, 27 women; mean age, 63 years) or CT angiography (50 men, 29 women; mean age, 64 years). For one of the 78 patients in the MR group, no data were available. Mean confidence for MR angiography (7.7) was slightly lower than that for CT angiography (8.0, P = .8). During 6 months of follow-up, 13 patients in the MR group compared with 10 patients in the CT group underwent additional vascular imaging (P = .5). Although not statistically significant, there was a consistent trend of less improvement in the MR group across all patient outcomes. The average cost for diagnostic imaging was 359 ($438) higher in the MR group than in the CT group (95% confidence interval: 209, 511 [$255, $623]; P < .001). Therapeutic costs were higher in the MR group, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that CT angiography has some advantages over MR angiography in the initial evaluation of peripheral arterial disease.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To assess how often rotational angiography depicts more severe internal carotid arterial stenosis compared with conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in two or three projections and how frequently this factor may affect patient treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rotational angiography (16 or 32 projections) was performed in addition to DSA in 47 stenotic internal carotid arteries (ICAs) in 38 symptomatic patients. ICA stenosis was measured independently at DSA and at rotational angiography with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. The degree of stenosis was categorized as 0%-29%, 30%-49%, 50%-69%, or 70%-99%. RESULTS: In three ICAs, rotational angiography was nondiagnostic. In 28 of the remaining 44 ICAs, the degree of stenosis was categorized similarly with DSA and rotational angiography, whereas with rotational angiography, 15 ICAs were classified one category higher and one ICA was classified two categories higher, owing to the increased number of projections available. Seventy percent to 99% stenosis was demonstrated in 18 ICAs with DSA and in 25 ICAs with rotational angiography. Thus, rotational angiography could have facilitated a change in the optimal treatment (from nonsurgical treatment to carotid arterial endarterectomy) in seven ICAs. CONCLUSION: Compared with DSA in two or three projections, rotational angiography frequently depicts more severe ICA stenosis. This indicates a limitation of DSA in depicting the maximum ICA stenosis.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Computerized tomography angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: from aneurysm detection to treatment without conventional angiography.

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to determine prospectively whether and to what extent computerized tomography (CT) angiography can serve as the sole imaging method for a preoperative workup in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: During a 1-year period, all patients who presented to the authors' hospital with subarachnoid hemorrhage demonstrated by unenhanced CT scanning or lumbar puncture underwent CT angiography. Two radiologists evaluated the CT angiography source images and maximum intensity projection slabs and arrived at a consensus. They categorized the quality of the CT angiography as adequate or inadequate and classified aneurysms that were detected as definitely or possibly present. The parent artery of anterior communicating artery aneurysms was identified by asymmetrical anterior cerebral artery size and asymmetrical aneurysm location. The parent artery was indicated by the larger A1 segment in cases of asymmetrical A1 size. Only CT angiograms of adequate quality that revealed aneurysms classified as definitely present and with an unequivocal parent artery were presented to the neurosurgeons, who decided whether preoperative digital subtraction (DS) angiography should still be performed. Forty-nine of the 100 studied patients did not undergo surgery because of poor clinical condition, nonaneurysmal cause of the hemorrhage, or endovascular treatment of the ruptured aneurysm. Of the 51 patients who underwent surgery, radiologists required DS angiography in 17 patients; the imaging technique provided greater certainty in 13 instances. The neurosurgeons required DS angiography 11 times; this provided additional information in two instances. Twenty-three (45%) of the 51 patients were surgically treated successfully on the basis of CT angiography findings alone. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized tomography angiography can replace DS angiography as the preoperative neuroimaging technique in a substantial proportion of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of multislice computerized tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with clipped aneurysms.

OBJECT: In this study the accuracy of multislice computerized tomography (MSCT) angiography in the postoperative examination of clip-occluded intracranial aneurysms was compared with that of intraarterial digital subtraction (DS) angiography METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with 60 clipped aneurysms (41 of which had ruptured) were studied with the aid of postoperative MSCT and DS angiography. Both types of radiological studies were reviewed independently by two observers to assess the quality of the images, the artifacts left by the clips, the completeness of aneurysm occlusion, the patency of the parent vessel, and the duration and cost of the examination. The quality of MSCT angiography was good in 42 patients (86%). Poor-quality MSCT angiograms (14%) were a result of the late acquisition of images in three patients and the presence of clip or motion artifacts in four. Occlusion of the aneurysm on good-quality MSCT angiograms was confirmed in all but two patients in whom a small (2-mm) remnant was confirmed on DS angiograms. In one patient, occlusion of a parent vessel was seen on DS angiograms but missed on MSCT angiograms. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting neck remnants on MSCT angiography were both 100%, and the sensitivity and specificity for evaluating vessel patency were 80 and 100%, respectively (95% confidence interval 29.2-100%). Interobserver agreements were 0.765 and 0.86, respectively. The mean duration of the examination was 13 minutes for MSCT angiography and 75 minutes for DS angiography (p < 0.05). Multislice CT angiography was highly cost effective (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Current-generation MSCT angiography is an accurate noninvasive tool used for assessment of clipped aneurysms in the anterior circulation. Its high sensitivity and low cost warrant its use for postoperative routine control examinations following clip placement on an aneurysm. Digital subtraction angiography must be performed if the interpretation of MSCT angiograms is doubtful or if the aneurysm is located in the posterior circulation.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗

PubMed2004

Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

This study evaluates the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. High-speed rotational angiography is a newly available angiographic modality that gives a dynamic multiple-angle perspective of the coronary tree during a single contrast injection. We prospectively randomized 56 patients referred for diagnostic coronary angiography to either standard or rotational angiography. Contrast and radiation utilization were compared between the two groups. The number of additional cine acquisitions needed was used to determine adequacy of the diagnostic study protocol. Rotational angiography was successfully completed in all subjects. There was a 33% reduction in contrast utilization in the rotational group as compared to the standard group (35.6 +/- 12.6 vs. 52.8 +/- 10.7 ml, respectively; P < 0.0001). Additionally, there was a 28% reduction in total radiation exposure in the rotational group as compared to the standard group (39.0 +/- 18.5 vs. 53.9 +/- 23.4 Gycm(2), respectively; P = 0.01). Total whole-body radiation exposure to the primary operator was 144 mrem with rotational angiography and 170 mrem with standard angiography. Procedure time tended to be shorter for rotational angiography (353.9 +/- 146.7 vs. 396.8 +/- 165.8 s; P = 0.3). Rotational coronary angiography can be rapidly performed in any patient and provides a significant reduction in contrast and radiation utilization while at the same time providing adequate angiographic data to complement or replace standard coronary angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

The value of combining anterior segment fluorescein angiography with indocyanine green angiography in scleral inflammation.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of anterior segment indocyanine green (ICG) angiography combined with anterior segment fluorescein angiography in scleral inflammation. DESIGN: Comparative observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 18 patients with various forms of scleral and episcleral disease and a single normal subject. METHODS: Anterior segment angiography using both ICG and fluorescein was performed to identify any vascular abnormalities and pathologic changes in the anterior segment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The pathologic criteria for anterior segment fluorescein angiography described by Watson and Bovey (1995) were used to compare and contrast the results of the angiograms. RESULTS: Fluorescein angiography and ICG angiography provide different and complementary information. Both dyes have different leakage patterns caused by their difference in optical and chemical properties. Areas of slow flow are more readily determined with fluorescein angiography. ICG angiography determines damage to and patency of individual vessels. CONCLUSION: Fluorescein angiography and ICG angiography detect areas of damage not clinically visible and can be useful in the differential diagnosis, the selection of appropriate medication, and monitoring and regulation of treatment in scleritis. To obtain the most information both investigations should be performed sequentially.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Contrast enhanced multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional invasive quantitative coronary angiography in acute coronary syndrome patients-correlation and bias.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies that compared multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) non-invasive coronary angiography with conventional coronary angiography, did not assessed the ability of MDCT to detect stenotic lesions correctly in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients. The aim of the present study was to assess prospectively the correlation and bias between 16-slice MDCT coronary angiography and quantitative coronary angiography analysis (QCA) in these patients. METHODS: Patients underwent electrocardiogram-gated, 16-slice MDCT coronary angiography and routine invasive percutaneous coronary angiography with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis blinded to MDCT results. The correlation and the bias between the results of MDCT and QCA were assessed in segments observed by both modalities in vessels > or = 2 mm in diameter. RESULTS: 59 patients (81% male, age 56 +/- 11 years), admitted due to ACS, underwent MDCT and invasive coronary angiography. 544 segments were analyzed. The correlations between MDCT and QCA observed for the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), the left circumflex coronary artery (Cx), the right coronary artery (RCA) and for all analyzed segments were 0.74 (P < 0.0001), 0.54 (P < 0.009), 0.72 (P < 0.0001) and 0.70 (P < 0.0001), respectively. By Bland-Altman analysis, a small overestimation of the lesion severity with MDCT of 4.8% for the LAD, 5.9% for the Cx, and 3.3% for the RCA was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients, MDCT contrast-enhanced coronary angiography provides good quantification of the luminal diameter as compared to coronary angiography, and it is characterized by a small overestimation bias.

Angina, Unstable↗

PubMed1991

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography.

Conventional angiography, two-dimensional inflow magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and color duplex ultrasound (US) were performed on 12 patients in a blinded, prospective study. The ability to grade arterial lesions and plan revascularization interventions were compared. Arterial lesions were categorized as nonsignificant (0%-49% diameter reduction) or significant (50%-100% diameter reduction). Determination of nonsignificant and significant lesions with MR angiography was in agreement with that at conventional angiography in 100 of 140 lesions (71%). Agreement between results of conventional angiography and color duplex US occurred with 114 of 123 infrainguinal lesions (93%). Twenty-one vascular interventions were planned by using conventional angiography; there was agreement with color duplex US in 11 cases and MR angiography in five. Color duplex US performed well in the assessment of infrainguinal disease but was limited in the evaluation of iliac segments because of nonvisualization. The iliac region was visualized in more patients with MR angiography than with color duplex US, but image quality with MR angiography was inconsistent. Strategies to improve MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature merit further study.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Diagnosis of arterial injuries caused by penetrating trauma to the neck: comparison of helical CT angiography and conventional angiography.

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral arterial injuries caused by penetrating neck trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted during 24 months in 60 patients with penetrating neck trauma who were referred for conventional angiography owing to clinical suspicion of arterial injury. In the patient population, 146 arteries (77 carotid, 69 vertebral) were studied by means of conventional angiography. In all patients, conventional angiography and helical CT angiography were completed within 6 hours. Two radiologists interpreted helical CT angiographic studies by means of consensus. Conventional angiography was the standard of reference for determining the sensitivity and specificity of helical CT angiography. RESULTS: Conventional angiograms showed arterial injuries in 10 (17%) of 60 patients. Conventional angiographic findings were arterial occlusion (n = 4), arteriovenous fistula (n = 2), pseudoaneurysm (n = 3), pseudoaneurysm with arteriovenous fistula (n = 1), and normal arteries (n = 136). Nine of 10 arterial injuries and all normal arteries were depicted adequately at helical CT angiography. Sensitivity of helical CT angiography was 90%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 98%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of helical CT angiography are high for detection of major carotid and vertebral arterial injuries resulting from penetrating trauma.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare CT angiography with conventional angiography for detecting stenosis at the carotid bifurcation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients referred for evaluation of carotid artery disease were studied with conventional angiography followed by CT angiography 4-24 hr later. Seventy carotid arteries were studied. CT angiograms were acquired by using 40-sec spiral scans with a 2-mm/sec table speed, 2-mm beam collimation, and IV iodinated contrast material injected at 2.5 ml/sec. Studies were interpreted on the CT workstation by using three-dimensional shaded surface objects and multiplanar reformations requiring 10-15 min per artery. The conventional and CT angiograms were interpreted by separate observers who did not know the results of the other imaging study. The degree of stenosis was determined by using the guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial collaborators. Each artery was categorized as normal, mildly stenosed (1-29%), moderately stenosed (30-69%), severely stenosed (70-99%), or occluded. RESULTS: The degree of carotid artery stenosis on the CT angiograms correlated well with that seen on the conventional angiograms (r = .928, p < .001). With CT angiography, all occluded internal carotid arteries were correctly identified, and no arteries were wrongly classified as occluded. The degree of stenosis was overestimated on CT angiograms by greater than 10% in 16 arteries, especially when calcified atherosclerotic plaque was present. In some of these cases, the severity of the stenosis was underestimated on the conventional angiograms. All arteries, except one, with severe disease seen on conventional angiograms were correctly classified on the basis of the results of CT angiography. CONCLUSION: Results of CT angiography had a high degree of correlation with results of conventional angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. CT angiography is multiplanar and allows differentiation of calcified plaque from contrast material, which provides information about plaque calcification, ulceration, and size that cannot be obtained with conventional angiography.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

MR angiography compared to conventional selective angiography in acute stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accuracy of intracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and reliability of interpretation are not well established compared to conventional selective catheter angiography. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of MRA in evaluation of intracranial vessels in acute stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (seven females, 22 males; median age 53) with acute stroke or TIA were enrolled into the study. All patients underwent both MRA using a 3 T clinical magnet and conventional angiography within 48 hours. Median time between MRA and angiography was 263 minutes. Conventional angiography preceded MRA in 15 cases. Fourteen patients received thrombolysis during MRA or angiography. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were obtained prior to the MR exam. One neuroradiologist rated all conventional angiograms, which were used as gold standard. Five observers, blinded to conventional angiography results and all clinical information except symptom side, rated the MR angiograms. Kappa statistics were used to assess reliability; contingency tables were used to assess accuracy of non-enhanced and enhanced MRA. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty two intracranial vessels were assessed. Agreement between raters was good for both non-enhanced (kappa = 0.50) and gadolinium-enhanced (kappa = 0.46) images. There were a total of 26 vessels occluded by DSA. Overall, the non-enhanced MRA showed sensitivity of 84.2% (95% CI 60.4-96.6) and specificity of 84.6% (95% CI 78.6-89.4). The enhanced MRA showed sensitivity of 69.2 (95% CI 38.6-90.9) and specificity of 73.6 (95% CI 65.5-80.7). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance angiography is a good non-invasive screening tool for assessing intracranial vessel status in acute ischemic stroke. Angiography remains the gold standard for definitive assessment of the intracranial circulation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

[3-dimensional MR coronary angiography in the navigator technic for the primary diagnosis of coronary heart disease: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography].

PURPOSE: Evaluation of three-dimensional MR coronary angiography with the navigator technique for the primary diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chest pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study 20 patients with chest pain were examined with MR coronary angiography and conventional angiography. The three-dimensional MR coronary angiography was performed using a 1.5 T scanner with an ECG-triggered 3D-FLASH-sequence and retrospective respiratory gating in the navigator technique. The MR coronary angiography was evaluated by two radiologists blinded to the results of the conventional coronary angiography. RESULTS: One patient was excluded from further evaluation due to reduced image quality. Conventional coronary angiography excluded CAD in 8/19 patients, 11/19 patients overall showed 20 stenoses (> 50%) or occlusions. With MR coronary angiography, CAD was correctly excluded in 7 patients, one patient was false positive, one patient was false negative. 14/20 stenoses (> 50%) or occlusions were detected, 5 stenoses were diagnosed false positive. Sensitivity and specificity for primary diagnosis of CAD or detection of coronary artery stenoses were 91% and 88% or 70% and 91%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Using MR coronary angiography with the navigator technique in the primary evaluation of CAD, the diagnosis of stenoses or occlusions of the main coronary arteries is feasible.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: The danger of limb loss as a consequence of acute occlusion of infrapopliteal bypasses underscores the requirement for careful patient follow-up. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement and accuracy of contrast material-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and duplex ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of failing bypass grafts. In cases of discrepancy, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR angiography was performed in 24 consecutive patients with 26 femorotibial or femoropedal bypass grafts. Each revascularized limb was divided into five segments--(i) native arteries proximal to the graft; (ii) proximal anastomosis; (iii) graft course; (iv) distal anastomosis; and (v) native arteries distal to the graft-resulting in 130 vascular segments. Three readers evaluated all MR angiograms for image quality and the presence of failing grafts. The degree of stenosis was compared to the findings of duplex US, and in case of discrepancy, to DSA findings. Two separate analyses were performed with use of DSA only and a combined diagnostic endpoint as the reference standard. RESULTS: Image quality was rated excellent or intermediate in 119 of 130 vascular segments (92%). Venous overlay was encountered in 26 of 130 segments (20%). In only two segments was evaluation of the outflow region not feasible. One hundred seventeen of 130 vascular segments were available for quantitative analysis. In 109 of 117 segments (93%), MR angiography and duplex US showed concordant findings. In the eight discordant segments in seven patients, duplex US overlooked four high-grade stenoses that were correctly identified by MR angiography and confirmed by DSA. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in these cases. In no case did MR angiography miss an area of stenosis of sufficient severity to require treatment. Total accuracy for duplex US ranged from 0.90 to 0.97 depending on the reference standard used, whereas MR angiography was completely accurate (1.00) regardless of the standard definition. CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggest that the accuracy of MR angiography for identifying failing grafts in the infrapopliteal circulation is equal to that of duplex US and superior to that of duplex US in cases of complex revascularization. MR angiography should be included in routine follow-up of patients undergoing infrapopliteal bypass surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare dynamic three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the detection of ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with carotid stenosis of more than 50% at sonography prospectively underwent both MR angiography and DSA. The overall quality of each DSA and MR angiographic study was analyzed. For each craniocervical vessel (brachiocephalic, common carotid, subclavian, and vertebral arteries) (n = 231), ostial stenosis was graded as follows: normal, mild (<50%), moderate to severe (>50%), or occlusion. MR angiographic and DSA results were compared by means of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rs). RESULTS: The overall diagnostic quality of MR angiography was excellent or adequate. Three studies were inadequate because of a poor signal-to-noise ratio (13 of 231 arteries) or a coverage error (five of 231 arteries). Findings at MR angiography and DSA agreed on the degree of stenosis (Rs = 0.82, P <.001). No cases of stenosis of more than 50% were missed at MR angiography. However, some discrepancies were noted between vertebral arteries and the other craniocervical vessels. The sensitivity and specificity for stenosis of more than 50% in other craniocervical vessels were 100% and 98%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for stenosis of more than 50% in the vertebral arteries were 100% and 85%, respectively. Findings at MR angiography tended to result in overestimation of the degree of ostial stenosis, especially in vertebral arteries (10 [15%] of 66 arteries). CONCLUSION: MR angiography is useful to rule out ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels. MR angiography is an adequate diagnostic tool for ostial stenosis, except in the vertebral artery.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Preoperative evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: usefulness of intraarterial 3D CT angiography and conventional angiography with a combined unit--initial experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of intraarterial computed tomographic (CT) angiography in conjunction with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) by using a combined CT and angiographic unit in the preoperative evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively, 22 patients with or without subarachnoid hemorrhage underwent CT angiography in conjunction with DSA. Two radiologists independently evaluated DSA and CT angiographic images. Referring neurosurgeons were questioned as to how the additional information provided by CT angiography changed patient treatment. RESULTS: Intraarterial CT angiography was superior to DSA for use in aneurysm detection in three (12%) of 26 aneurysms and for delineation of aneurysm shape, neck, and location in more than half. In 14 (64%) of 22 patients, CT angiography demonstrated 18 additional findings: a very small aneurysm (n = 2), aneurysm shape and neck (n = 6), relationship of the aneurysm to adjacent arteries or bone structure (n = 8), and branches deriving from the aneurysm (n = 2). In four (27%) of 15 patients who underwent surgery or embolization, additional information obtained at CT angiography affected the treatment. CT angiography failed to clearly demonstrate an aneurysm adjacent to bone structures and small perforators, which were derived from the parent artery. CONCLUSION: Intraarterial CT angiography is useful for preoperative evaluation of intracranial aneurysms as a supplement to DSA.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Nonselective left internal mammary artery angiography during right transradial coronary angiography: a simple, rapid, and safe technique.

Internal mammary artery angiography is increasingly required, but the technique for left internal mammary artery (LIMA) angiography during right transradial coronary angiography is not well established. The authors investigated the feasibility and safety of a new, simple, and rapid nonselective technique. Following right transradial coronary angiography, LIMA angiography was performed using a 5 French (Fr) Judkins JL-3.5 catheter in 110 patients. The catheter, placed in the ascending aorta with its natural curve, was withdrawn slowly while being rotated clockwise to engage its tip in the proximal left subclavian artery. Contrast material was injected while sphygmomanometer cuff inflation was applied to the left upper arm. In the last 50 patients, the angiography was performed twice randomly with and without the cuff inflation. In 108 patients (98%), the catheter was successfully engaged in the subclavian artery in a mean of 11 +/- 8 seconds (range, 3-136) from the time when it was withdrawn from the ascending aorta, and nonselective LIMA angiography was successfully performed. The image quality of the angiograms was satisfactory in 103 (95%) of the 108 patients. In the last 50 patients, the image quality of the angiograms was determined satisfactory in 48 (96%) and 45 (90%) patients, with and without the cuff inflation, respectively. The difference was statistically not significant. There were no complications, including arterial dissection and thromboembolism. In conclusion, nonselective LIMA angiography can be readily and safely performed during right transradial coronary angiography using a 5 Fr Judkins JL-3.5 catheter.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Impact of MDCT angiography on the use of catheter angiography for the assessment of cervical arterial injury after blunt or penetrating trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of the increasing use of MDCT angiography in the setting of blunt and penetrating neck trauma on the use of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) at our institution, a level 1 trauma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2003, 57 patients were referred for CT angiography or DSA of the neck after blunt or penetrating neck trauma. All CT angiograms were acquired with a 4-MDCT scanner. The patients were divided into three groups on the basis of consecutive 12-month periods (2001, 2002, and 2003), and the initial imaging technique was recorded. The results of CT and digital subtraction angiograms were compared with operative findings and with clinical course, when available. RESULTS: In 2001, 12 patients were referred for imaging: nine patients were evaluated initially with DSA and three patients were evaluated with CT angiography and subsequently with DSA. In 2002 and 2003, 11 and 34 patients, respectively, underwent CT angiography as the initial imaging examination. During these 2 years, no patient underwent DSA as the initial diagnostic test, but five patients underwent DSA after CT angiography for the following indications: evaluation of nondiagnostic CT angiograms (n = 1), confirmation of findings when requested by the clinical service (n = 2), and catheter-guided therapy (n = 2). CONCLUSION: CT angiography has essentially replaced DSA as the study of choice for the initial evaluation of the neck vessels in the setting of blunt or penetrating trauma at our institution. CT angiography is adequate for the initial evaluation, allows appropriate triage of patients to conventional angiography or surgery for appropriate treatment, and can guide conservative management when appropriate.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Surgical anatomy of the cerebral arteries in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of computerized tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to compare computerized tomography (CT) angiography and digital subtraction (DS) angiography studies in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) to assess their vascular anatomy relevant to cerebral aneurysm surgery. METHODS: From a prospective series of 100 patients with SAH, the authors selected 73 patients whose CT angiography studies were of adequate quality and in whom DS angiography of both carotid arteries had been performed. Eleven patients with no DS angiographic studies of the vertebrobasilar artery were only evaluated for the anterior half of the circle of Willis. Anterior communicating arteries (ACoAs), both precommunicating anterior cerebral arteries (A1 segments), both posterior communicating arteries (PCoAs), and both precommunicating posterior cerebral arteries (P1 segments) were assessed on CT angiography and DS angiography by two independent observers. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized tomography angiography compares well with DS angiography for visualizing normal-sized arteries, and is superior for visualizing ACoAs and hypoplastic A1 and P, segments. Important preoperative aspects such as dominant A1 segments and PCoAs are equally well seen using either modality. Neither method enabled the authors to visualize more than 50% of PCoAs. Use of CT angiography can provide the required preoperative anatomical information for aneurysm surgery in most patients with SAH.

Adult↗