PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Calibration”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Superiority of in vitro over in vivo calibrations of BCECF in vascular smooth muscle cells.

We measured intracellular pH (pHi) in single vascular smooth muscle cells (VSM) cultured from rabbit abdominal aorta, using 2',7'-biscarboxyethyl-5(6)carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) on a microscope-based fluorimetric system. We previously found substantial errors introduced by using high K+/nigericin to calibrate intracellular BCECF (1). We also previously demonstrated that the necessary correction (pHcor) to the high K+/nigericin-calibrated pHi was linearly dependent on pHi, increasing with increasing pHi (2). When the nigericin calibration data were corrected using this pHcor, the new corrected calibration was similar to the result of calibrating BCECF in vitro (higher Rmax, lower Rmin, and lower pK). Therefore, in this study the possibility is considered that in vitro calibrations might provide better estimates of pHi. Our best estimate for the absolute level of pHi derives from a null method for bracketing steady-state pHi. In VSM cells, using only in vitro calibrations to estimate steady-state pHi leads to less error (only approximately 0.08 different from null estimates) than using nigericin calibrations alone (approximately 0.2 different from null estimates). Unlike high K+/nigericin calibrations, the error, pHcor, introduced by using an in vitro calibration is pHi independent. Using high K+/nigericin or in vitro calibrations, along with the respective pHcor on the same experimental days in the same cells, gave the same estimate of pHi whether in the steady state, in acid-loaded cells, or in alkali-loaded cells. Similarly, when appropriately corrected, both methods gave indistinguishable calibration curves. Thus, the two methods are entirely equivalent from the standpoint of accuracy. Because nigericin is toxic, expensive, and complicated in its use, we suggest that in vitro calibrations, along with simple null determinations to assess the small, constant correction factor, be used to calibrate intracellular BCECF.-Boyarsky, G., Hanssen, C., Clyne, L. A. Superiority of in vitro over in vivo calibrations of BCECF in vascular smooth muscle cells.

Animals↗

Frequency of goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks.

PURPOSE: To investigate how quickly Goldmann applanation tonometers used in clinical practice develop calibration errors, and to determine the frequency of checks required to detect these errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective check of the calibration error of all Haag-Streit Goldmann applanation tonometers in the department at month zero, month one, and month four. The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration check weight bar by two independent observers. Calibration errors were classed as +/-0.5 to 2.5 mm Hg, +/-3 to 4 mm Hg, or >+/-4 mm Hg. Tonometers with a calibration error greater than +/-2.5 mm Hg were returned to the manufacturer for re-calibration. RESULTS: At month zero 2 of 34 (5.9%), at month one 3 of 29 (10.3%), and at month four 0 of 33 (0.0%) tonometers fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of +/-0.5 mm Hg. A total of 14 of 34 (41.2%) tonometers at month zero, 10 of 29 (34.5%) tonometers at month one, and 17 of 33 (51.5%) tonometers at month four were identified to have calibration errors greater than +/-2.5 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Goldmann applanation tonometers are not as accurate as the manufacturer's recommended calibration error tolerance of +/-0.5 mm Hg would suggest. Calibration error of less than +/-2.5 mm Hg is clinically acceptable. Calibration error checks should be carried out once monthly and tonometers with calibration error greater than +/-2.5 mm Hg returned to the manufacturer for re-calibration. Additional checks should be made if tonometers suffer specific damage. Ideally individual ophthalmologists should check calibration before each session.

Calibration↗

Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.

Cone-beam computed tomography systems have been developed to provide in situ imaging for the purpose of guiding radiation therapy. Clinical systems have been constructed using this approach, a clinical linear accelerator (Elekta Synergy RP) and an iso-centric C-arm. Geometric calibration involves the estimation of a set of parameters that describes the geometry of such systems, and is essential for accurate image reconstruction. We have developed a general analytic algorithm and corresponding calibration phantom for estimating these geometric parameters in cone-beam computed tomography (CT) systems. The performance of the calibration algorithm is evaluated and its application is discussed. The algorithm makes use of a calibration phantom to estimate the geometric parameters of the system. The phantom consists of 24 steel ball bearings (BBs) in a known geometry. Twelve BBs are spaced evenly at 30 deg in two plane-parallel circles separated by a given distance along the tube axis. The detector (e.g., a flat panel detector) is assumed to have no spatial distortion. The method estimates geometric parameters including the position of the x-ray source, position, and rotation of the detector, and gantry angle, and can describe complex source-detector trajectories. The accuracy and sensitivity of the calibration algorithm was analyzed. The calibration algorithm estimates geometric parameters in a high level of accuracy such that the quality of CT reconstruction is not degraded by the error of estimation. Sensitivity analysis shows uncertainty of 0.01 degrees (around beam direction) to 0.3 degrees (normal to the beam direction) in rotation, and 0.2 mm (orthogonal to the beam direction) to 4.9 mm (beam direction) in position for the medical linear accelerator geometry. Experimental measurements using a laboratory bench Cone-beam CT system of known geometry demonstrate the sensitivity of the method in detecting small changes in the imaging geometry with an uncertainty of 0.1 mm in transverse and vertical (perpendicular to the beam direction) and 1.0 mm in the longitudinal (beam axis) directions. The calibration algorithm was compared to a previously reported method, which uses one ball bearing at the isocenter of the system, to investigate the impact of more precise calibration on the image quality of cone-beam CT reconstruction. A thin steel wire located inside the calibration phantom was imaged on the conebeam CT lab bench with and without perturbations in source and detector position during the scan. The described calibration method improved the quality of the image and the geometric accuracy of the object reconstructed, improving the full width at half maximum of the wire by 27.5% and increasing contrast of the wire by 52.8%. The proposed method is not limited to the geometric calibration of cone-beam CT systems but can be used for many other systems, which consist of one or more point sources and area detectors such as calibration of megavoltage (MV) treatment system (focal spot movement during the beam delivery, MV source trajectory versus gantry angle, the axis of collimator rotation, and couch motion), cross calibration between Kilovolt imaging and MV treatment system, and cross calibration between multiple imaging systems. Using the complete information of the system geometry, it was demonstrated that high image quality in CT reconstructions is possible even in systems with large geometric nonidealities.

Algorithms↗

Individual calibration for estimating free-living walking speed using the MTI monitor.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to devise a new individual calibration method to enhance MTI accelerometer estimation of free-living level walking speed. METHOD: Five female and five male middle-aged adults walked 400 m at 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 km x h(-1), and 800 m at 6.5 km x h(-1) on an outdoor track, following a continuous protocol. Lap speed was controlled by a global positioning system (GPS) monitor. MTI counts-to-speed calibration equations were derived for each trial, for each subject for four such trials with each of four MTI, for each subject for the average MTI, and for the pooled data. Standard errors of the estimate (SEE) with and without individual calibration were compared. To assess accuracy of prediction of free-living walking speed, subjects also completed a self-paced, "brisk" 3-km walk wearing one of the four MTI, and differences between actual and predicted walking speed with and without individual calibration were examined. RESULTS: Correlations between MTI counts and walking speed were 0.90 without individual calibration, 0.98 with individual calibration for the average MTI, and 0.99 with individual calibration for a specific MTI. The SEE (mean +/- SD) was 0.58 +/- 0.30 km x h(-1) without individual calibration, 0.19 +/- 0.09 km x h(-1) with individual calibration for the average MTI monitor, and 0.16 +/- 0.08 km x h(-1) with individual calibration for a specific MTI monitor. The difference between actual and predicted walking speed on the "brisk" 3-km walk was 0.06 +/- 0.25 km x h(-1) using individual calibration and 0.28 +/- 0.63 km x h(-1) without individual calibration (for specific accelerometers). CONCLUSION: MTI accuracy in predicting walking speed without individual calibration might be sufficient for population-based studies but not for intervention trials. This individual calibration method will substantially increase precision of walking speed predicted from MTI counts.

Acceleration↗

Calibration of infrared milk analyzers: modified milk versus producer milk.

Mid-infrared (MIR) milk analyzers are traditionally calibrated using sets of preserved raw individual producer milk samples. The goal of this study was to determine if the use of sets of preserved pasteurized modified milks improved calibration performance of MIR milk analyzers compared with calibration sets of producer milks. The preserved pasteurized modified milk sets exhibited more consistent day-to-day and set-to-set calibration slope and intercept values for all components compared with the preserved raw producer milk calibration sets. Pasteurized modified milk calibration samples achieved smaller confidence interval (CI) around the regression line (i.e., calibration uncertainty). Use of modified milk calibration sets with a larger component range, more even distribution of component concentrations within the ranges, and the lower correlation of fat and protein concentrations than producer milk calibration sets produced a smaller 95% CI for the regression line due to the elimination of moderate and high leverage samples. The CI for the producer calibration sets were about 2 to 12 times greater than the CI for the modified milk calibration sets, depending on the component. Modified milk calibration samples have the potential to produce MIR milk analyzer calibrations that will perform better in validation checks than producer milk-based calibrations by reducing the mean difference and standard deviation of the difference between instrument values and reference chemistry.

Animals↗

A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.

The aim of this project was to compare three phantoms used for cross-calibration of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with an in vivo cross-calibration. The phantoms used were the Bona Fide Phantom (BFP), the European Spine Phantom (ESP) and the GE Lunar Aluminum Spine Phantom (ASP). The cross calibration was for L2-L4 lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) on a GE Lunar DPX-L and Hologic QDR 2000. The in vivo cross-calibration was obtained using 72 subjects (61 female, 11 male; mean age 49 years, range 14-84 years). The phantoms were measured 10 times without repositioning on both instruments. A further, long-term cross-calibration was obtained with the BFP over a 9 month period. The true linear relationship between the two instruments was calculated used a standardized principal components method. The mean residuals were calculated between each phantom cross-calibration line and the in vivo data to obtain a measure of the goodness of fit between the phantom cross-calibration and the in vivo data. There was no significant difference between the in vitro and in vivo cross-calibrations. The long-term BFP cross-calibration gave an in vitro cross-calibration that is closest to the in vivo cross-calibration in this group of subjects. When calculating Hologic QDR BMD from results on the GE Lunar DPX-L, the ASP underestimates Hologic QDR 2000 BMD by 4% at high BMD and overestimates by 4% at low BMD. The ESP cross-calibration overestimates Hologic QDR2000 BMD by 1% at high BMD and 4% at low BMD. The BFP performs best, overestimating Hologic QDR2000 BMD by between 1.2% and 1.8%, whilst the difference between the long-term BFP cross-calibration and the in vivo data is less than 1% over the range of BMD covered.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Feasibility study for the production of certified calibrants for the determination of deoxynivalenol and other B-trichothecenes: intercomparison study.

Thirteen European laboratories experienced in the analysis of mycotoxins participated in an intercomparison study within a European Commission-funded project. Goals of the study were to check the fitness for purpose of a small batch of gravimetrically prepared calibrants; to compare individually prepared calibrants with common calibrants; to check the feasibility of toxin mixtures as calibrant solutions; and to give recommendations on the production of future certified reference materials (CRMs) with regard to the nature of the calibrant and the means of certification. Each laboratory received ampules of each common calibrant containing single toxins [solution containing either deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyl-DON (3-Ac-DON), nivalenol (NIV), or 15-acetyl-DON (15-Ac-DON)] and 3 ampules of toxin-mixture (solutions of DON + 3-Ac-DON + NIV in acetonitrile) of known concentrations (about 20 microg/mL). Ampules with single toxins (solution containing either DON, 3-Ac-DON, NIV, or 15-Ac-DON) and a toxin-mixture (solutions of DON + 3-Ac-DON + NIV in acetonitrile) of unknown concentrations were distributed to the participants for quantification. The participating laboratories used mainly high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-diode array detection UV for DON, 3-Ac-DON, NIV, and 15-Ac-DON; gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) and GC-mass spectrometry methods were used sparingly. Linear calibration curves were achieved by >90% of the participants. Relative between-day variation (RSDr) of 26% of the laboratories was greater than the target value of 5% for HPLC, and RSDr of 32% of the laboratories was greater than the desired value of 10% for GC. Relative between-laboratory variation (RSDR) of the GC results obtained with single common calibrants was greater than the target value of 16% for all laboratories. RSDR of the HPLC results for the common unknown single toxin solutions was less than the target value of 8% except for 15-Ac-DON. Generally, better recoveries were observed from common calibrants (102% for mix calibrants and 98% for single calibrants) than from individually prepared calibrants (95%). This international comparison study clearly showed the high scattering of results in the analysis of type-B trichothecenes, particularly when GC was used. Obviously, this intercomparison study was not suited for the certification of B-trichothecenes. A certification of the proposed calibrant material was therefore recommended on the basis of its gravimetrical preparation.

Calibration↗

Determination of the efficiency of commercially available dose calibrators for beta-emitters.

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this investigation are to determine whether commercially available dose calibrators can be used to measure the activity of beta-emitting radionuclides used in pain palliation and to establish whether manufacturer-supplied calibration factors are appropriate for this purpose. METHODS: Six types of commercially available dose calibrators were studied. Dose calibrator response was controlled for 5 gamma-emitters used for calibration or typically encountered in routine use. For the 4 most commonly used beta-emitters ((32)P, (90)Sr, (90)Y, and (169)Er) dose calibrator efficiency was determined in the syringe geometry used for clinical applications. Efficiency of the calibrators was also measured for (153)Sm and (186)Re, 2 beta-emitters with significant gamma-contributions. Source activities were traceable to national standards. RESULTS: All calibrators measured gamma-emitters with a precision of +/-10%, in compliance with Swiss regulatory requirements. For beta-emitters, dose calibrator intrinsic efficiency depends strongly on the maximal energy of the beta-spectrum and is notably low for (169)Er. Manufacturer-supplied calibration factors give accurate results for beta-emitters with maximal beta-energy in the middle-energy range (1 MeV) but are not appropriate for use with low-energy ((169)Er) or high-energy ((90)Y) beta-emitters. beta-emitters with significant gamma-contributions behave like gamma-emitters. CONCLUSION: Commercially available dose calibrators have an intrinsic efficiency that is sufficient for the measurement of beta-emitters, including beta-emitters with a low maximum beta-energy. Manufacturer-supplied calibration factors are reliable for gamma-emitters and beta-emitters in the middle-energy range. For low- and high-energy beta-emitters, the use of manufacturer-supplied calibration factors introduces significant measurement inaccuracy.

Beta Particles↗

Performance of a device to minimise radiation dose to the hands during radioactive syringe calibration.

The preparation of syringes for routine applications in nuclear medicine, and in particular the calibration procedure, is associated with high radiation exposure to the hands. To reduce this radiation burden, our group developed a modified calibration procedure based on a device that we refer to as the ActivoFix, which allows syringes to be drawn up inside the dose calibrator. This study investigated the performance of the new device as compared to the usual procedure of syringe calibration with regard to the absorbed radiation dose to the hands (fingertips and middle finger bases), the precision of the calibration procedure and the time required to calibrate syringes. Fourteen experienced nuclear medicine technologists drew up syringes from an initial eluate of 8.2 GBq using the conventional technique and the new calibration procedure. All technologists had to calibrate syringes with 50 MBq, 250 MBq and 650 MBq. This sequence was repeated four times using the conventional technique and then the new procedure. The equivalent dose to the hands was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. The exact amount of radioactivity in the syringe and the time needed for the calibration procedure were also recorded. The reduction in equivalent dose using the new device compared with the routine procedure ranged from 8.3- to 19.6-fold (mean 14.3-fold) for the fingers of the dominant hand and from 13.6- to 40.3-fold (mean 27-fold) for those of the non-dominant hand (total mean 21.3-fold). For small volumes, time could be saved with the ActivoFix, whereas for greater volumes time was lost. The device produced less variability in calibrating doses at 250 MBq and 650 MBq. Following the ALARA principle, the new device can be recommended for syringe calibration in nuclear medicine because the use of the ActivoFix-based procedure reduces finger dose by an average factor of 21, improves the precision of calibration and reduces the filling time for small volumes.

Calibration↗

A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: a SWOT analysis.

Modelling activated sludge systems has gained an increasing momentum after the introduction of activated sludge models (ASMs) in 1987. Application of dynamic models for full-scale systems requires essentially a calibration of the chosen ASM to the case under study. Numerous full-scale model applications have been performed so far which were mostly based on ad hoc approaches and expert knowledge. Further, each modelling study has followed a different calibration approach: e.g. different influent wastewater characterization methods, different kinetic parameter estimation methods, different selection of parameters to be calibrated, different priorities within the calibration steps, etc. In short, there was no standard approach in performing the calibration study, which makes it difficult, if not impossible, to (1) compare different calibrations of ASMs with each other and (2) perform internal quality checks for each calibration study. To address these concerns, systematic calibration protocols have recently been proposed to bring guidance to the modeling of activated sludge systems and in particular to the calibration of full-scale models. In this contribution four existing calibration approaches (BIOMATH, HSG, STOWA and WERF) will be critically discussed using a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis. It will also be assessed in what way these approaches can be further developed in view of further improving the quality of ASM calibration. In this respect, the potential of automating some steps of the calibration procedure by use of mathematical algorithms is highlighted.

Algorithms↗

Influence of calibration methodology on ground water flow predictions.

We constructed a numerical model of transient ground water flow and solute transport for a portion of the Biscayne Aquifer in Florida, and calibrated the model with three different combinations of data from a 193-day period: head (h) data alone, data on h and ground water discharge to a canal (q), and data on h, q, and ground water chloride concentration (C). We used each of the three calibrated models to predict h and q during a 182-day test period separate from the calibration period. All three calibrated models predicted h equally well during the test period (r = 0.95, where r = 1 indicates perfect agreement between measured and simulated values), though the model calibrated on h alone had significantly different parameter values than the other two models. Predictions of q during the test period depended on calibration methodology; models calibrated with multiple targets simulated q more accurately than the model calibrated on h alone (r = 0.79 compared to r = 0.49). Based on the results of these simulations, we conclude: (1) Post-calibration prediction is important in assessing the value of different data types in automated calibration; (2) inverse-solution uniqueness is not a requirement for accurate h predictions; (3) relatively simple models can predict with reasonable accuracy transient ground water flow in a complex aquifer, and parameters governing this prediction can be estimated by nonlinear regression methods that incorporate both h and q data; (4) addition of C data to the calibration did not improve model predictive capacity because the information in the C data was similar to that in the q data, from the perspective of model calibration (the subsurface chemical signal in question was controlled mainly by seepage of high-chloride canal water into the low-chloride ground water system).

Calibration↗

Field study of lyophilized calibrant plasmas for fresh plasma INR determination.

An alternative approach to INR estimation is for laboratories to calibrate their own local system using calibrant plasmas supplied by manufacturers or reference laboratories. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the within-laboratory variability of a calibrant plasma procedure using various sets of lyophilized plasmas. INR had been assigned to 13 calibrant plasmas in a previous multi-center study. Each of 10 other ("field") laboratories measured PTs in the 13 calibrant plasmas and in 15 local fresh coumarin plasmas, using three different thromboplastin reagents. Each fresh coumarin PT was converted to INR using a calibration procedure with a set of 4 calibrants (1 normal + 3 abnormals). The abnormals of each set were either coumarin or artificial and were used with different assigned INR. When the INR had been assigned with a thromboplastin brand identical to the thromboplastin in the field laboratory, the procedure was named "reagent-specific" calibration. Otherwise the procedure was named "dissimilar" calibration. Using "reagent-specific" calibration procedures, relatively homogeneous INR were obtained for the fresh coumarin plasmas, whatever type of calibrant was used. In contrast, discrepant INR were obtained when "dissimilar" cross-species calibration procedures were used. The study was limited to 9 laboratories using the same type of coagulometer and one using a different type.

Anticoagulants↗

Usefulness of lyophilized calibration plasmas for International Normalized Ratio determination with the bovine combined thromboplastin (Thrombotest): results of a collaborative study.

The logical solution to account for the influence of coagulometers on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) is local calibration with freeze-dried plasmas. However, because of their unpredictable behavior these plasmas must be validated before large-scale implementation. We report on a collaborative exercise designed to evaluate the suitability of a set of such plasmas used with Thrombotest in combination with a coagulometer provided by the manufacturer to be used with that reagent. This was a two-step study. First, one lot of reagent was calibrated against the international standard OBT/79 in two expert laboratories. The calibrated lot was then used as an intermediate standard to calibrate two additional lots of the same reagent in four field laboratories where the ISI was determined for both plasma and native blood. The International Normalized Ratio (INR) for the patient plasmas tested in each laboratory were calculated using two algorithms: the World Health Organization-recommended ISI mode (gold standard), and the simplified calibration plasma mode. In the latter, the INR was derived from the local calibration curve constructed by plotting the certified INR versus local coagulation times obtained with calibration plasmas. The between-algorithm INR differences indicate that this set of calibration plasmas may be employed for local INR calibration of the investigated reagent/instrument combination, especially when plasma is used for INR determination where the average INR (range) difference is 5% (3-13%) or 2% (3-8%) according to whether the INRs to calibration plasmas were assigned by the manufacturer or by the two expert laboratories. A slight but measurable difference of the INR may be predicted [9% (6-20%) or 6% (8-15%)] if this set of calibration plasmas is used for local calibration when native blood is employed for INR determination. Whether this bias is of practical significance is to be determined.

Animals↗

The nature of calibrators in immunoassays: are they commutable with test samples? Must they be?

Immunoassay systems require calibration protocols that are normally more sophisticated than many analytical techniques in routine clinical use. Calibrators used in such assays may differ significantly from the analyte in clinical specimens. Differences in the properties of calibrators, or reference materials, from those of clinical specimens may include: species origin of the calibrator for an analyte; integrity of the molecular species; matrix of the calibration solution; addition of preservative agents. Owing to the large number of potential differences in the properties of calibrators and those of serum specimens that may affect immunoassay results, the concept of commutability that we originated and first applied to enzyme activity measurements can readily be applied to immunoassay determinations. We specifically examined the properties of calibration materials in nine commercial immunoassay tests for human thyrotropin. Significant non-commutability of materials was demonstrated. The measured results obtained with authentic patient sera differed by a factor of approximately two fold between the techniques exhibiting the lowest and greatest numeric results. Considerably larger intermethod biases were found for calibration materials. Multivariate analysis revealed that the patient sera formed a highly focussed pattern. The calibration materials for one instrument system also focussed in this group. Other calibrators formed three foci indicating similar patterns of commutability within each of the three groups. Clustering was independent of the amount of thyrotropin in the patient specimens, but appeared to be concentration-dependent for at least some of the calibrators. Thus the availability of a common calibration material appears feasible, but not presently available in many commercial products. A processed human serum, a candidate material for use in our proficiency testing program, was projected in the same cluster as authentic patient sera indicating that this material has intermethod properties identical to patient sera (i.e. fully commutable).

Humans↗

Calibrated phase II clinical trials in oncology.

This paper proposes the use of calibrated designs in phase II oncological clinical trials and evaluates their statistical properties in terms of power recovery and cost. A calibrated phase II design for a new cancer treatment for a specific tumour, e.g. colo-rectal, consists of random allocation of patients to receive either the investigational treatment or a standard treatment known to have activity at a certain level in phase II trials (e.g. 5 FU, expected response proportion = 0.20). Patients assigned to the standard treatment form the calibration group. The calibration group is not a control group in the traditional sense and one does not conduct a formal efficacy comparison between the investigational treatment group and the calibration group. Instead, one uses the calibration group to evaluate whether the sample of patients who receive the investigational treatment has the capability of showing a response. If the data do not support the hypothesis that the expected response proportion prevails in the calibration group, one declares the investigational group results suspect and recommends a second trial. Assuming acceptable results of the second trial, we use binomial calculations to find the effect of the calibration design on power recovery and relative cost. We show that when an unrepresentative sample occurs, calibration designs generally recover 90 per cent or more of nominal power at a cost of three to fivefold increase in sample size. We recommend for calibrated phase II trials a 'master protocol' approach in which several investigational treatment arms share one concurrent calibration group.

Calibration↗

A new calibration method that compensates for the effects of O2 and N2 on infrared CO2 analysers.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates a method for calibrating mainstream CO(2) analysers in which CO(2) partial pressure (P (CO2)) is calculated as a function of the outputs of CO(2) and O(2) analysers. METHODS: Three mass flow controllers were used to generate 25 different reference mixtures of O(2), N(2) and CO(2). Reference gas mixtures were combinations of P (CO2) = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 kPa and O(2) partial pressure (P (O2)) = 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 kPa (balance N(2)). CO(2) and O(2) analyser data were fitted by a calibration equation which took into account the effects of oxygen partial pressure and nonlinearity of the CO(2) analyser. The calibration coefficients were tested in a separate validation data set with a variety of combinations of CO(2) and O(2). RESULTS: Our new calibration method yields a standard deviation of CO(2) measurement error that is significantly lower than a CO(2)-only calibration method in the validation data set (0.54% versus 2.72%, P < 0.05). P (CO2) measurement errors produced by the single gas calibration equation are significantly correlated with P (O2) in both the calibration (R = -0.9906, P < 0.05) and validation data sets (R = -0.9642, P < 0.05), but the errors given by our new calibration equation are independent of P (O2) (R = -0.0364, NS, and R = -0.0305, NS, for calibration and validation data sets respectively). Calibration with only CO(2) cannot eliminate the error related to the collision broadening effect of O(2), which in our CO(2) analyser is approximately a 1% underestimation of P (CO2) for every 10 kPa (75 mmHg) increase in P (O2). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that non-dispersive infrared CO(2) analyser readings can be substantially affected by background oxygen. This effect can be corrected for by calibrating the CO(2) analyser with gases containing known proportions of both CO(2) and O(2).

Blood Gas Analysis↗

A calibration method that simplifies and improves accurate determination of peptide molecular masses by MALDI-TOF MS.

The use of delayed ion extraction in MALDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry distorts the linear relationship between m/z and the square of the ion flight time (t2) with the consequence that, if a mass accuracy of 10 ppm or better is to be obtained, the calibrant signals have to fall close to the analyte signals. If this is not possible, systematic errors arise. To eliminate these, a higher-order calibration function and thus several calibrant signals are required. For internal calibration, however, this approach is limited by signal suppression effects and the increasing chance of the calibrant signals overlapping with analyte signals. If instead the calibrants are prepared separately, this problem is replaced by an other; i.e., the ion flight times are dependent on the sample plate position. For this reason, even if the calibrants are placed close to the sample, the mass accuracy is not improved when a higher-order calibration function is applied. We have studied this phenomenon and found that the relative errors, which result when moving from one sample to the next, are directly proportional to m/z. Based on this observation, we developed a two-step calibration method, that overcomes said limitations. The first step is an external calibration with a high-order polynomial function used for the determination of the relation between m/z and t2, and the second step is a first-order internal correction for sample position-dependent errors. Applying this method, for instance, to a mass spectrum of a mixture of 18 peptides from a tryptic digest of a recombinant protein resulted in an average mass error of 1.0 ppm with a standard deviation of 3.5 ppm. When instead using a conventional two-point internal calibration, the average relative error was 2.2 ppm with a standard deviation of 15 ppm. The new method is described and its performance is demonstrated with examples relevant to proteome research.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

Statistical evaluation of internal and external mass calibration laws utilized in fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.

The statistical evaluation of two common and three new calibration laws utilized in Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry are presented. Electrospray ionization was used to prepare a series of mass spectra of ammonium-adducted polypropylene glycol (PPG) with an average molecular weight of 1000 Da. The singly charged PPG-1000 oligomers allowed for the description of a broad range of m/z and abundance values within each mass spectrum. The hexapole accumulation time was varied to afford a range of total ion abundance values of about an order of magnitude. To examine each of the calibration laws, we utilized cross-validation both "within-spectrum" and "between-spectra" for internally and externally calibrated data, respectively. In addition, we used t-statistics to ensure that each calibration coefficient was statistically significant and necessary to accurately describe the variation in the data. In comparison to commonly used calibration laws for internal calibration, our new calibration law based on multiple linear regression offered a 2-fold improvement in mass measurement accuracy (MMA). In comparison to external calibration laws without automatic gain control, our new calibration law using multiple regression improved the MMA by >10-fold; this improvement would increase further as the dynamic range of the measurement increases (e.g., a biological system). For both our internal and external calibration laws, the median MMA was less than 1 part-per-million. Furthermore, we investigate the number of calibrant ions as well as their required m/z range in order to successfully achieve high MMA.

Calibration↗