SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Appropriateness of use of colonoscopy is an important issue in health care in the quest to improve quality of care while at the same time containing costs. This prospective study examined whether detailed and explicit appropriateness criteria significantly improve the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for diagnostic colonoscopy at five centers (one university hospital and its outpatient department, two district hospitals, and two gastroenterology practices) were prospectively studied over a 17-month period. The appropriateness of the indications for these colonoscopies was assessed using explicit Swiss criteria developed by the Rand Corporation/University of California at Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) panel method, and the relationship between appropriateness of use and the presence of clinically relevant endoscopic lesions was analysed. RESULTS: 1188 patients were included in the study. Indications for 1144 (96.3 %) of the colonoscopies could be evaluated using explicit criteria; 64.1 % of the colonoscopies were judged appropriate, 13.3 % uncertain and 22.6 % inappropriate. Significant endoscopic lesions were found in 23.8 % of the colonoscopies. Colonoscopies judged appropriate or uncertain yielded significantly more relevant lesions than did those judged to be inappropriate (25.6 % vs. 17.4 %; P = 0.007). Of 51 colon cancers, all but one were found in colonoscopies judged to be appropriate or uncertain. In a multivariate analysis, the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy was significantly influenced by appropriateness, patient gender and treatment setting. CONCLUSIONS: The use of detailed and explicit appropriateness criteria for colonoscopy significantly enhances the identification of relevant lesions and in particular of colon cancer. The use of such criteria could therefore improve patient selection for colonoscopy and thus contribute to efforts aimed at enhancing the quality and efficiency of care.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND: Virtual colonoscopy is a new method of imaging the colon in which thin-section, helical computed tomography (CT) is used to generate high-resolution, two-dimensional axial images. Three-dimensional images of the colon simulating those obtained with conventional colonoscopy are then reconstructed off-line. We compared the performance of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. METHODS: We prospectively studied 100 patients at high risk for colorectal neoplasia (60 men and 40 women; mean age, 62 years). We performed virtual colonoscopy immediately before conventional colonoscopy. We inserted a rectal tube and insufflated the colon with air to the maximal level that the patient could tolerate. We administered 1 mg of glucagon intravenously immediately before CT scanning to minimize the degree of smooth-muscle spasm and peristalsis and to reduce the patient's discomfort. RESULTS: The entire colon was clearly seen by virtual colonoscopy in 87 patients and by conventional colonoscopy in 89. Fifty-one patients had normal findings on conventional colonoscopy. In the other 49, we identified a total of 115 polyps and 3 carcinomas. Virtual colonoscopy identified all 3 cancers, 20 of 22 polyps that were 10 mm or more in diameter (91 percent), 33 of 40 that were 6 to 9 mm (82 percent), and 29 of 53 that were 5 mm or smaller (55 percent). There were 19 false positive findings of polyps and no false positive findings of cancer. Of the 69 adenomatous polyps, 46 of the 51 that were 6 mm or more in diameter (90 percent) and 12 of the 18 that were 5 mm or smaller (67 percent) were correctly identified by virtual colonoscopy. Although discomfort was not specifically recorded, none of the patients requested that virtual colonoscopy be stopped because of discomfort or pain. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of patients at high risk for colorectal neoplasia, virtual and conventional colonoscopy had similar efficacy for the detection of polyps that were 6 mm or more in diameter.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Screening colonoscopy use among individuals at higher colorectal cancer risk.

GOALS: To describe screening colonoscopy use in those with a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC). BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is an effective means of screening for CRC and is preferred for individuals at higher risk. We therefore derived population-based estimates of colonoscopy use and analyzed how individual characteristics and family history correlate with colonoscopy. STUDY: Individuals between the ages of 41 and 75 years who responded to the Cancer Control Module of the 2000 National Health Interview Study were analyzed. Screening colonoscopy was defined as having a colonoscopy for screening purposes within the last 10 years. Screening colonoscopy was the dependent variable and family history was the independent variable in a logistic regression model that included self-described sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 13,160 individuals in the analysis, 6.8% had a family history of CRC, corresponding to approximately 5.5 million individuals in the United States. Those with a family history were significantly more likely to report screening colonoscopy (27.8%) than those without a family history (7.7%; P<0.001). In those with a family history, screening colonoscopy significantly correlated with tobacco use, education, and age. There was no trend for increased screening colonoscopy with having multiple family members or a young family member with CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Over 5.5 million people in the US have a family history of CRC, and only 1 in 4 report having had a screening colonoscopy by the year 2000. Improving knowledge about CRC and addressing other barriers to screening in this group will be important components of improving screening colonoscopy utilization.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of preoperative virtual colonoscopy to examine the proximal colon in patients with distal occlusive carcinomas, defined as cancers that cannot be traversed endoscopically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with occlusive colorectal carcinomas underwent preoperative virtual colonoscopy with use of a standard protocol. Patients with acute bowel obstruction were excluded. Results of virtual colonoscopy were compared with the findings of preoperative colonoscopy, preoperative barium enema examination, intraoperative colon palpation, histopathologic outcome, and postoperative colonoscopy and barium enema examination, where possible. RESULTS: Virtual colonoscopy helped identify all 29 occlusive carcinomas and demonstrated two cancers and 24 polyps in the proximal colon. Both synchronous cancers were confirmed intraoperatively and resected. Postoperative conventional colonoscopy in 12 patients confirmed 16 polyps identified at virtual colonoscopy and demonstrated two subcentimeter polyps missed at virtual colonoscopy. Postoperative barium enema examination was performed in two patients and helped confirm two polyps identified at virtual colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy successfully demonstrated the proximal colon in 26 of 29 patients examined compared with preoperative barium enema examination, which failed to adequately demonstrate the proximal colon in any patient examined. CONCLUSION: Virtual colonoscopy is a feasible and useful method for evaluating the entire colon before surgery in patients with occlusive carcinomas.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Cost-effectiveness of a single colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A single colonoscopy at the age of 65 years has been recommended as a potential option to screen for colorectal cancer. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of 2 screening programs based on a single or repeated colonoscopy. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of screening is analyzed with a computer model of a Markov process. A hypothetical population of 100 000 subjects aged 50 years undergoes a single colonoscopy at the age of 65 years or repeated colonoscopy every 10 years starting at the age of 50. Transition rates are estimated from US vital statistics and cancer statistics and published data on polyp incidence, patient compliance, and efficacy of colonoscopy plus polypectomy in cancer prevention. Costs of screening and cancer care are estimated from the 1998 Medicare reimbursement data using the perspective of a third-party payer. RESULTS: Compared with no screening, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of a single or repeated colonoscopy amounts to $2981 or to $10 983 per life year saved, respectively. A single colonoscopy saves most life years if done at the age of 60, but becomes most cost-effective after the age of 70. Depending on the level of compliance, repeated colonoscopies save 2 to 3 times more lives than a screening program based on a single colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: A repeated colonoscopy every 10 years offers better prevention against colorectal cancer and represents a medically more desirable screening option. If high costs or low patient compliance renders this option not feasible, a single colonoscopy at the age of 65 would represent a highly cost-effective alternative.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Is a negative colonoscopy associated with reassurance or improved health-related quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Although colonoscopy is rarely of clinical use in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), it is, nonetheless, frequently performed in IBS. Proponents contend that a normal colonoscopy provides reassurance and improves health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, no previous data have measured these effects. We sought to measure the association of a normal colonoscopy with reassurance and HRQOL in patients with IBS aged <50 years. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 458 patients with IBS, aged 18 to 49 years. Subjects completed a symptom questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) psychometric checklist, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. The main outcomes were HRQOL as measured by the mental component score (MCS) and the physical component score (PCS) of the SF-36 and reassurance as operationalized by a negative response to the question: "Do you think there is something seriously wrong with your body?" The independent variable was presence or absence of a previous normal colonoscopy. We performed regression analysis to control for potential confounders, including timing of colonoscopy. RESULTS: The unadjusted mean SF-36 PCS was 42 +/- 10 (0-100 scale: 0, worst) in patients with recent colonoscopy (<12 months), 45 +/- 11 in patients with distant colonoscopy (>12 months), and 45 +/- 10 in patients without colonoscopy (p = 0.78). The mean SF-36 MCS in the 3 groups were 42 +/- 13, 44 +/- 11, and 43 +/- 11 (p = 0.57). Colonoscopy did not impact the proportion reassured (69.3%, 67.2%, 66.6%; p = 0.85). There were no significant differences between groups for any outcomes when adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: We found no independent association between a negative colonoscopy and reassurance or improved HRQOL in IBS patients aged <50 years. These results suggest that the role of colonoscopy in IBS may be limited but require confirmation in prospective trials.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Repeat colonoscopy has a low yield even in symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: In many regions, the demand for colonoscopy exceeds its availability. Patients undergoing repeat examinations comprise a significant proportion of those on waiting lists. OBJECTIVE: To assess the yield of repeat colonoscopy in varied clinical settings. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Endoscopic database of an Australian tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Adults who had >/=2 colonoscopies between 1992 and 2004. Patients were excluded if the repeat procedure was for completion or for high-risk surveillance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Yield for neoplasia by indication, interval to repeat examination, and appropriateness for surveillance (determined by National Australian guidelines). RESULTS: A total of 4974 colonoscopies in 2075 patients were studied. The mean age was 63.1 years (range, 19.2-92.4 years). The mean number of examinations was 2.4 (range, 2-8), with a mean interval between examinations of 2.9 years. Colorectal cancer (CRC) was significantly more prevalent at initial colonoscopy compared with subsequent colonoscopies (7.9% vs 0.6%; prevalence ratio 14.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5-23.7, P < .001), as were advanced adenomas (15.3% vs 4.8%; prevalence ratio 3.2, 95% CI 2.6-3.9, P < .001). No CRCs were detected in symptomatic patients undergoing polyp surveillance examinations performed before the recommended interval. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Yield of repeat colonoscopy is significantly lower than for initial colonoscopy, irrespective of indication. In symptomatic patients within a polyp surveillance program, the yield is negligible when a colonoscopy is performed before the recommended surveillance interval. The need for a repeat colonoscopy should be carefully considered, and patients who have never had a colonoscopy must take priority on waiting lists over those awaiting repeat examinations.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Early colonoscopy for acute lower GI bleeding predicts shorter hospital stay: a retrospective study of experience in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate management of lower-GI hemorrhage remains controversial largely because outcomes data are lacking. It is our hypothesis that clinical factors, such as comorbidity, hemodynamic instability, and timing of colonoscopy, are associated with hospital lengths of stay. METHODS: Medical records of patients hospitalized for lower-GI hemorrhage from 1993 to 2000 were reviewed and abstracted, and a Cox regression model was constructed to explore associations between time to discharge (i.e., length of stay) and clinical parameters. RESULTS: A total of 565 hospitalizations for acute lower-GI hemorrhage were examined in which mean length of stay was 6.7 days. Colonoscopy was performed during 415 hospitalizations. Approximately a third of patients were discharged within 48 hours after colonoscopy. In the regression model, hemodynamic instability, higher comorbidity, performance of a tagged red blood cell nuclear scan, and surgery for hemostasis were significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of discharge. Having a colonoscopy was associated with an increased likelihood of being discharged compared with not having a colonoscopy at any given time point during hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.5: 95% CI[1.2, 1.8]. The mean lengths of stay for patients having colonoscopy within 24 hours of hospitalization was shorter than those having colonoscopy after 24 hours of hospitalization (5.4 vs. 7.2 days; p<0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lower-GI hemorrhage, earlier colonoscopy predicted earlier hospital discharge. However, colonoscopy did not necessarily lead to expedited post-procedural discharge. Although early colonoscopy appears to shorten hospital length of stay, prospective studies of inpatient colonoscopy are needed to determine the impact of this approach on outcomes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Safety and efficacy of colonoscopy after myocardial infarction: an analysis of 100 study patients and 100 control patients at two tertiary cardiac referral hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to analyze the risks vs. the benefits of colonoscopy soon after myocardial infarction. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy within 30 days after myocardial infarction at two large tertiary cardiac referral hospitals were studied. The study group was compared with 100 control patients with neither myocardial infarction nor unstable angina during the preceding 6 months (matched for age, colonoscopy indication, and colonoscopist) who underwent colonoscopy. RESULTS: Indications for colonoscopy were bleeding per rectum (37 patients), fecal occult blood (36 patients, hematocrit < 30% in 25), iron deficiency anemia (11 patients, hematocrit < 25% in 9), and other (16 patients). Colonoscopy was performed at a mean of 15.5 (8.3) days after myocardial infarction. Two patients underwent colonoscopic colonic decompression. Colonoscopy was diagnostic in 46 (47%) of the study patients vs. 41% of the control patients ( p = 0.47, chi-square test). The relative rate of ischemic colitis was significantly higher in study vs. control patients (14 vs. 2, p < 0.005). Other diagnoses in study patients were the following: colon cancer (8), bleeding internal hemorrhoids (5), pseudomembranous colitis (5), high-risk adenomatous polyp (large or villous histopathology) (4), and other (10). Urgent colonoscopy was diagnostic in 63% of cases. Twenty-three patients had a major therapeutic benefit consequent to colonoscopy, including colon cancer surgery in 5. Study patients were significantly sicker than control patients (APACHE II score 9.9 [4.3] vs. 7.4 [2.8], p < 0.0001) and suffered significantly more colonoscopic complications compared with control patients (9 vs. 1; OR 5.2: 95% CI [1.2, 9.8], p < 0.03). Minor complications without clinical sequelae occurred in 8 study patients (asymptomatic hypotension or bradycardia). One major complication occurred in this group that was probably not procedure related. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy in patients with a recent myocardial infarction is associated with a higher rate of minor, transient, and primarily cardiovascular complications compared with control patients but is relatively infrequently associated with major complications. Colonoscopy is beneficial and indicated after myocardial infarction, despite a higher risk, in certain circumstances. The relative frequency of ischemic colitis was relatively high in study patients.

APACHE↗

PubMed2003

Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Computed-tomographic (CT) colonography has been introduced as a minimally invasive colon examination for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. The aim of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of multidetector-array CT colonography (MDCTC) and conventional colonoscopy in a prospective, blinded design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six symptomatic patients, 75 patients undergoing polyp and cancer surveillance, and seven patients undergoing preoperative colonoscopy due to colorectal cancer (CRC) were examined with MDCTC and subsequent colonoscopy. The gold standard was colonoscopy. If MDCTC was positive and the first-pass colonoscopy was negative, a second-pass colonoscopy served as the gold standard. RESULTS: Complete colonoscopy was achieved in 91% of the patients, while technically satisfying MDCTC was obtained in 76% of the patients (P < 0.01), insufficient air distension in the sigmoid colon being the main problem. MDCTC and colonoscopy both detected all 11 carcinomas. Overall detection rates for polypoid lesions 6 mm or larger in size were 81% (95% CI, 70% to 90%) for MDCTC and 87% (95% CI, 77% to 94%) for colonoscopy (P = 0.52), with a significant difference with regard to the detection of polyps 6-9 mm in size in favor of colonoscopy (P = 0.008). The specificity of MDCTC at a 6-mm level was 97% (95% CI, 92% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: MDCTC and colonoscopy show equal overall sensitivity for the detection of polypoid lesions 6 mm or larger in size, but more patients are inadequately examined when MDCTC is used.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy within a defined population in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy, introduced in the late 1960s, has become the principal method for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of colorectal diseases. Being invasive, colonoscopy is associated with a risk of complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in a population-based setting. METHODS: All colonoscopy records for 1979 to 1995 in 1 Swedish county (population 258,000) were retrieved. Information was obtained about patients' demographics, date of examination, endoscopist, indications, findings, colonoscopy type, completion level, and complications. Records were linked to the Cause of Death Register and the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register to ascertain mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: In 6066 colonoscopies, the overall morbidity was 0.4% (diagnostic 0.2%, therapeutic 1.2%). The most frequent complications were bleeding (0.2%) and perforation (0.1%), with no colonoscopy-related mortality. Bleeding was confined to therapeutic colonoscopy and occurred immediately, mainly after removal of large polyps with thick stalks. Perforations at diagnostic colonoscopy occurred in the left colon; they were diagnosed sooner than perforations associated with therapeutic colonoscopy where the cecum was the most frequent site. The bleeding rate was correlated to the experience of the endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is a safe procedure, and the rate of adverse events in this population-based setting was low.

Colon↗

PubMed2002

Complete colonoscopy rarely misses cancer.

BACKGROUND: The assumption that colonoscopy is highly accurate for detecting colorectal cancer was tested by identifying cancer subsequent to colonoscopy in 2 cohorts of patients in which colonoscopy was reported as normal. METHODS: A multicenter endoscopy database was used to identify all reportedly normal colonoscopies. One cohort was assessed 5 years after colonoscopy with the use of a population-based health services-linked database to link patient morbidity, cancer, and mortality data. The second cohort was assessed by identifying patients who had cancer on repeat colonoscopy. RESULTS: Of 1047 patients with normal colonoscopies followed for 5 years or until death if earlier, 5 cancers (0.5%) were detected. This rate was not significantly different from that predicted by Australian statistics (risk = 1.0%, p > 0.1), but significantly lower compared with that for all patients presenting for colonoscopy during the study period (risk = 5.2%, p < 0.001). In another cohort of 8486 patients with reportedly normal colonoscopies, 496 patients underwent repeat colonoscopies during an average follow-up of 3.1 years; cancer was diagnosed at the subsequent procedure in 3 patients (0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The high accuracy of colonoscopy is demonstrated by the low risk of harboring an advanced neoplastic lesion after a normal examination.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate.

BACKGROUND: Low-volume oral colonoscopy preparations are easier to tolerate and are gaining popularity at the expense of large-volume lavage solutions. The aims of this two-part study were to compare two oral colonoscopy bowel preparations, sodium phosphate (NaP) and magnesium citrate (Mg), and to assess the effects of timing and dilution of NaP. METHODS: Part 1 included 300 ambulatory patients randomized to receive NaP or Mg on the day before colonoscopy. Patients completed a questionnaire before colonoscopy. The endoscopist, blinded to the type of bowel preparation, rated bowel cleansing and recorded the presence of any rectosigmoid aphthous ulcers. In part 2, a total of 297 patients received NaP diluted into 3 doses 10 minutes apart the evening before and the morning of the day of colonoscopy. This group was compared with the group in part 1 that received NaP in two separate single doses entirely the day before colonoscopy. RESULTS: NaP and Mg were well tolerated. When preparations were taken the day before colonoscopy, Mg achieved better bowel cleansing (p < 0.001). Taking NaP entirely the day before colonoscopy resulted in poor right colon cleansing (27%). In contrast, taking NaP the evening before and morning of colonoscopy improved cleansing in the right colon (p < 0.001). Vomiting occurred less frequently with dilution of NaP. Rectosigmoid aphthous ulcers occurred more often with NaP (5.5%) than Mg (1%), p < 0.01. For patients who, according to questionnaire, had received a previous bowel preparation, NaP and Mg were both preferred over large-volume lavage solutions, whereas NaP was preferred over Mg. CONCLUSIONS: When taken entirely the day before colonoscopy, Mg is superior to NaP. Taking NaP the evening before and morning of colonoscopy improved bowel cleansing compared with taking it entirely the day before. Dilution of NaP reduces vomiting. NaP induces rectosigmoid aphthous ulcers more often than Mg.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2007

Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: A major health priority is to increase colorectal cancer screening, and colonoscopy has become an increasingly important method of screening. The Medicare program began coverage for colonoscopy for average risk individuals in 2001. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine whether overall colorectal cancer screening increased over time and whether these increases were a result of increased utilization of all methods or a result of greater use of colonoscopy but reduced use of other methods, whether the enactment of Medicare coverage was associated with an increase in colonoscopy among Medicare enrollees, and whether these trends equally affected subpopulations. METHODS: We used nationally representative data from the 2000 and 2003 National Health Interview Surveys and analyzed data using used chi, difference-in-differences tests, and logistic regression analyses to examine whether screening rates differed between 2000 and 2003. RESULTS: The percentage of individuals being screened for colorectal cancer using any method increased modestly from 2000 to 2003 (3%), with increases a result of increased use of colonoscopy and a reduction in the use of other methods. Increases in colonoscopy use were significant among all populations except the insured, non-Medicare population with low incomes. Among Medicare enrollees with high/middle incomes, colonoscopy use increased 14% from 2000 to 2003 compared with an increase of only 7% among low-income groups, which was a significant difference (P < 0.01). Similarly, among insured, non-Medicare enrollees with high/middle incomes, colonoscopy use increased 11% from 2000 to 2003 compared with an increase of only 4% among low-income groups, which also was a significant difference (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening utilization increased modestly from 2000 to 2003, with the increases that primarily were the result of increased colonoscopy use. Increases in colonoscopy use, however, were primarily among high/middle income groups. Although Medicare coverage may have indirectly facilitated the increase in colonoscopy, we could not determine that coverage directly increased screening rates. Screening rates remain modest and lower income individuals continue to be screened less. Topics for future research include approaches to facilitating screening among low-income individuals and evaluating the impact of policy coverage decisions.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Patient attitudes toward undergoing colonoscopy without sedation.

OBJECTIVE: The vast majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy in the United States are given sedation. There are a number of potential advantages to performing colonoscopy without sedation. We sought to determine the attitude of patients toward unsedated colonoscopy in our three practice settings (a university medical center, a cancer center, and a Veterans Affairs medical center), and to see if there were factors that predicted willingness to try it. METHODS: Four-hundred thirty-four adult patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy completed questionnaires before and after their procedures providing demographic information and assessing willingness to undergo colonoscopy without sedation. Patients were routinely given meperidine and midazolam for their procedures unless they specifically requested that they be unsedated (10 patients). RESULTS: Only 16.9% of our patients were willing to undergo colonoscopy on their preprocedure questionnaire. Willingness increased modestly on the postprocedure questionnaire to 22.6% (p = 0.01). Logistic regression analysis disclosed that male gender, having a college degree, low anxiety based on preprocedure anxiety scales, and lower doses of sedative drugs used during colonoscopy were the best predictors of willingness to undergo colonoscopy without sedation in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Only about a fifth of patients undergoing colonoscopy in our three practice settings expressed a willingness to try colonoscopy unsedated. Male gender, higher levels of education, and low anxiety scores on simple scales of preprocedure anxiety may help to predict willingness. Efforts to substantially increase the frequency of patients willing to undergo colonoscopy without sedation will likely require increased patient counseling and education.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate attitudes among primary care physicians and potential patients concerning "virtual" and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: We sent 1000 questionnaires to primary care physicians by electronic or postal mail and administered 400 to potential patients. Questionnaires contained progressively detailed information about the tests and asked for choices based on information presented. RESULTS: One hundred eight-eight primary care physicians and 323 potential patients were included. Results indicated the following: 76.6% of potential patients and 47.3% of physicians initially preferred virtual colonoscopy because of its noninvasive nature; 23.6% of potential patients and 52.9% of physicians valued the ability of conventional colonoscopy to visualize the mucosa directly; and 67.4% of potential patients and 51.6% of physicians preferred virtual colonoscopy because it does not require sedation. Considering all information, most potential patients preferred virtual to conventional colonoscopy (60.2% vs 25.7%), whereas more physicians preferred conventional to virtual colonoscopy (44.9% vs 30.3%). Additionally, 82.3% of potential patients would comply more with recommendations for colorectal cancer screening, and 61.7% of physicians would refer more patients for screening, if virtual colonoscopy was available. CONCLUSIONS: Potential patients preferred virtual to conventional colonoscopy, whereas physicians favored conventional colonoscopy. Physicians placed more importance on the ability of conventional colonoscopy to visualize the mucosa directly, the opportunity for therapy, and cost. Potential patients were more encouraged than physicians by the availability of virtual colonoscopy for improving participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed2002

Retrospective analysis of missed advanced adenomas on surveillance colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Miss rates of large polyp/cancer during colonoscopy are reported from tertiary centers where experts do the colonoscopies. This information is important for determining surveillance intervals for repeat colonoscopy, patient safety, and malpractice issues. We evaluated retrospectively the miss rates of advanced adenomas in the setting of a GI fellowship training where most colonoscopies are done by closely supervised fellows. METHODS: We reviewed the 235 patients who had at least one repeat colonoscopy after initial polypectomy, between 1992 and 1999, at the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Advanced adenomas were defined as polyps 10 mm or greater in size with or without a villous component or high-grade dysplasia. Data of missed advanced adenomas on 122 patients who had complete colonoscopy with satisfactory preparation and the excluded patients are reported. RESULTS: Four advanced adenomas (one had intramucosal cancer) on second colonoscopy and two advanced adenomas on third colonoscopy were missed. The miss rate of advanced adenoma for 232 patients was 1.7%, and the miss rate for the 122 patients with complete colonoscopy and satisfactory colon preparation was 2.5% and 3.3% on second and third repeat colonoscopy, respectively. No cancer was missed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows an advanced polyp miss rate that is comparable with other studies even in a fellowship training setting. Prospective studies with tandem surveillance colonoscopy are needed to confirm our findings.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2004

Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Although variable-stiffness colonoscopes have been developed, difficult or incomplete colonoscopies occasionally occur. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope (scVSC) as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopies. METHODS: First, we retrospectively reviewed the cecal intubation rate of colonoscopies in which an adult standard colonoscope (AC) was immediately switched to an scVSC in all patients in whom a colonoscopy with an AC was incomplete. Second, 374 consecutive patients were randomized to undergo colonoscopy with a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope (PVSC, n = 123), AC (n = 125), or scVSC (n = 126). The scVSC was used by the same endoscopist to reattempt colonoscopy immediately after colonoscopy with a PVSC or an AC had been assessed as difficult or incomplete. The cecal intubation rate and time and the ancillary maneuvers used were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-two (2.5%) of the 2,056 attempted colonoscopies with an AC did not reach the cecum. Fifty-one of the 52 patients (98.1%) had complete colonoscopies after the switch from the AC to the scVSC. The initial intubation rate and time were not statistically different among the groups: PVSC, 95% and 6.8 min; AC, 91% and 7.5 min; and scVSC, 98% and 8.2 min. Cecal intubation was achieved in all five patients (100%) and in 10 out of 11 (91%) patients, respectively, after the PVSC or AC was switched to the scVSC. CONCLUSIONS: The completion rate markedly improved after switching from an AC or PVSC to an scVSC in difficult or incomplete colonoscopies, although the scVSC does not appear to offer any distinct advantage over the AC or PVSC for routine colonoscopies.

Colonoscopes↗