PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Comparative Genomic Hybridization”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Gene Copy Number Analysis by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with gene- and locus-specific probes provides a rapid means to assess copy numbers of specific sequences in individual interphase nuclei. Recent technical improvements have made FISH applicable to the analysis of both fresh and archival tissue specimens in research as well as in diagnostic laboratories. FISH is limited to analysis of one or a few loci at a time, making genome-wide surveys impractical. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was developed as a means to screen entire genomes for DNA sequence copy number changes. CGH is based on the cohybridization of differentially labeled test and reference DNAs to normal metaphase chromosomes. Measurement of the test to reference fluorescence ratios along all chromosomes provides information on chromosomal regions that are over- or underrepresented in the test genome. The use of these two techniques will be illustrated in the analysis of genetic changes in solid tumors. The techniques are complementary to one another and have proven to be highly useful for identification of previously unknown genetic changes and genes that play an important role in tumor progression.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

CGHScan: finding variable regions using high-density microarray comparative genomic hybridization data.

BACKGROUND: Comparative genomic hybridization can rapidly identify chromosomal regions that vary between organisms and tissues. This technique has been applied to detecting differences between normal and cancerous tissues in eukaryotes as well as genomic variability in microbial strains and species. The density of oligonucleotide probes available on current microarray platforms is particularly well-suited for comparisons of organisms with smaller genomes like bacteria and yeast where an entire genome can be assayed on a single microarray with high resolution. Available methods for analyzing these experiments typically confine analyses to data from pre-defined annotated genome features, such as entire genes. Many of these methods are ill suited for datasets with the number of measurements typical of high-density microarrays. RESULTS: We present an algorithm for analyzing microarray hybridization data to aid identification of regions that vary between an unsequenced genome and a sequenced reference genome. The program, CGHScan, uses an iterative random walk approach integrating multi-layered significance testing to detect these regions from comparative genomic hybridization data. The algorithm tolerates a high level of noise in measurements of individual probe intensities and is relatively insensitive to the choice of method for normalizing probe intensity values and identifying probes that differ between samples. When applied to comparative genomic hybridization data from a published experiment, CGHScan identified eight of nine known deletions in a Brucella ovis strain as compared to Brucella melitensis. The same result was obtained using two different normalization methods and two different scores to classify data for individual probes as representing conserved or variable genomic regions. The undetected region is a small (58 base pair) deletion that is below the resolution of CGHScan given the array design employed in the study. CONCLUSION: CGHScan is an effective tool for analyzing comparative genomic hybridization data from high-density microarrays. The algorithm is capable of accurately identifying known variable regions and is tolerant of high noise and varying methods of data preprocessing. Statistical analysis is used to define each variable region providing a robust and reliable method for rapid identification of genomic differences independent of annotated gene boundaries.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1993

Cytogenetic profiling using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) allow cytogenetic analyses of primary tumors without culture. CGH allows detection and mapping of allelic imbalance by simultaneous in situ hybridization of differentially labeled tumor (green fluorescing) and normal DNA (red fluorescing) to a normal human metaphase spread. Regions of increased or decreased copy number in the tumor are mapped onto the normal metaphase chromosomes as increases or decreases in the green to red fluorescence ratio. This technique gives a comprehensive assessment of gene dosage imbalance throughout the tumor. However, it is limited, at present, to fairly large tumors containing few normal cells. FISH, on the other hand, allows analysis of DNA sequence copy number at specific loci in single nuclei. A wide variety of DNA probes is available for FISH, including chromosome-specific probes which hybridize to alpha-satellite pericentromeric DNA regions (to detect changes in specific chromosome copy number and overall ploidy) and specific locus probes targeting 20-150 kilobase sequences (to detect specific amplifications, deletions, breakpoints, or rearrangements). FISH using these probes has been applied to interphase nuclei in touch preparations, smears from fine needle aspirates, and thin (< 6 microns) and thick (> 20 microns) sections cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Analysis of thick sections allows accurate actual signal enumeration within the histological context. This approach may allow analysis of subtle premalignant, early malignant, and infiltrating tumors in which malignant cells must be differentiated from nonmalignant cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chromosome Aberrations↗
PubMed2006

Fluorescent in situ hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization: complementary techniques for genomic evaluation.

During the past few years a new high-throughput molecular technology, array comparative genomic hybridization, has received a great deal of attention. As a DNA-based tool, this technique is presumably more reproducible than expression arrays. In this review, I discuss how array comparative genomic hybridization is remarkably similar with regard to genome analysis to fluorescent in situ hybridization, a technique that is generally regarded as one of the more accurate and reproducible molecular techniques in diagnostic surgical pathology. A thorough understanding of this technology will be useful for all surgical pathologists in the near future, as this technology will no doubt have some influence on our daily practice.

Gene Expression Profiling↗
PubMed2005

Characterization of six marker chromosomes by comparative genomic hybridization.

We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in six patients with de novo prenatal or postnatal extra marker chromosomes (MC). In four cases, MCs were mosaic and in one of them, the MC was detected in less than 50% of the cells. In three cases, CGH identified the origin of the extra MCs. In the other three, two prenatal cases and one child with an abnormal phenotype, CGH showed normal profiles. Among these cases, a normal profile and entirely C-band positive was identified suggesting that MC did not contain euchromatin. Genetic imbalances detected by CGH were as follow: a gain of 8p10-p12 in a boy with facial dysmorphism, hyperactivity and speech delay, a gain of 8q10-q12 in a healthy man with a history of spontaneous abortions, and a gain of 15q11-q13 in a girl with speech delay, and motor skill and object manipulation difficulties. Clinical data of these patients were compared with those reported in the literature. We conclude that CGH is a very useful and powerful tool for characterizing prenatal or postnatal MCs, even when the mosaicism is present and the MCs are present in less than 50% of the cells.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.

Array-comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique for detection of multiple chromosomal abnormalities in genomic DNA samples. Using an a-CGH with 287 probes, we examined 14 cases of breast infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDCA) that had previously been classified by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) as either human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) or HER2- and analyzed the data by hierarchical, K-means, and principal component analyses. The aim of the study was to identify the genetic abnormalities that are present in breast IDCAs and determine if the global status of 287 cytogenetic locations could be used as a more objective method for breast IDCA classification. Concordance between FISH and a-CGH at the HER2 locus was 78.6% (11/14). In general, a-CGH detected more abnormalities in HER2+ cases. In HER 2+ cases, chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 17, and 20 had more regions that showed statistically significant (P < or = 0.01) changes in DNA copy number. Among all the aberrant cytogenetic locations detected, 20q13, 7p12.3 approximately p12.1, and 17q23.2 approximately q25.3, which contain among others, genes for TNFRSF6B, EGFR, and TK1 showed statistically significant gains (P < or = 0.01) in 83, 66.7, and 50% of the HER2+ IDCA cases, respectively. Chromosome location 8q24.12 approximately q24.13 was the only region that showed consistent amplification in approximately 50% of the HER2- cases. Unsupervised hierarchical and K-means cluster analyses and principal component analysis using the DNA copy number status of 287 cytogenetic locations or the 177 cytogenetic locations that showed statistically significant differences revealed a cluster consisting of mainly HER2- IDCA cases. Even though this study demonstrates the usefulness of a-CGH in the rapid identification of aberrant DNA regions in tumor samples, we conclude that an array-CGH with more than 287 probes will be needed for a more precise mapping of DNA aberrations at the global level.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Gains, losses, and amplifications of DNA sequences evaluated by comparative genomic hybridization in chondrosarcomas.

Comparative genomic hybridization was used to search for previously unknown gains and losses of DNA sequences along all chromosome arms in 29 chondrosarcoma specimens obtained from 23 patients. Extensive genetic aberrations, with a mean of 6 changes per tumor (range, 1 to 24), were detected in 21 of the 29 samples analyzed (72%). The majority of these changes were gains of whole chromosomes or whole chromosome arms. Gains of DNA sequence copy number were most frequent at 20q (38%), 17p (38%), 20p (31%), 1cen-q24 (28%), and 14q23-qter (28%). High-level amplifications of small chromosome regions were sporadic, detected in only 17% of the samples. The only recurrent high-level amplification, seen in two tumors (7%), affected the minimal common region 12cen-q15. Other amplifications, each encountered only once, involved 1p33-p35, 2p23-pter, 4p, 6p22-pter, 18q12-q22, 19p13.2, 19q13.2, and 20q13.1. Losses of DNA sequences were rare and were most commonly observed at 6cen-q22 (17%) and 9p (17%).

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization.

The standard comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) protocol relies on availability of macroscopic tumor samples, which do not contain too much interfering normal cells. Recently, CGH after universal amplification of genomic DNA with degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR (DOP-PCR) has been used to detect genetic aberrations in microdissected tumor specimens. However, owing to the technical difficulties, CGH results of only few microdissected samples have so far been published. We have developed an improved protocol for DOP-PCR, which includes direct incorporation of fluorochrome-conjugated nucleotides into the PCR product. Among the four polymerase enzymes tested. ThermoSequenase gave the best yield, with PCR products ranging from 100-4,000 bp. A two-step PCR-procedure was used, consisting of a preamplification with low stringency conditions followed by amplification in more stringent conditions. The method was first validated by hybridizing DOP-PCR-amplified normal DNA against nick-translated reference DNA, which showed uniform amd even hybridization result for all chromosomes. Comparison of DOP-PCR CGH to conventional CGH in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line further indicated that genetic aberrations can be reliable detected after DOP-PCR amplification. The sensitivity of the DOP-PCR-CGH was tested by serial dilution of MCF-7 DNA. Fifty picograms of sample DNA (corresponding roughly to two MCF-7 cells) was sufficient for high quality CGH. Experiments with cells microdissected from intraductal breast cancer demonstrated that carcinoma cells from 1 to 2 ducts were sufficient for a successful DOP-PCR CGH analysis. We conclude that the improved DOP-PCR-CGH protocol provides a powerful tool to study genetic aberrations in different histological subpopulations of malignant as well as precancerous lesions. DOP-PCR also improves the success rate of conventional paraffin-block CGH, because a poor quality or a too low yield of extracted DNA can be compensated by universal DNA amplification by DOP-PCR.

DNA, Neoplasm↗
PubMed2003

Moth sex chromatin probed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).

Abstract: Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) with a probe mixture of differently labeled genomic DNA from females and males highlighted the W chromosomes in mitotic plates and the W chromatin in polyploid interphase nuclei of the silkworm Bombyx mori, the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella, and the wax moth Galleria mellonella. The overproportionate fluorescence signal indicated an accumulation of repetitive sequences in the respective W chromosomes. Measurements of the fluorescence signals revealed two components, one that is present also in male DNA (non-W chromosomes) and another one that is present only in or preponderantly in female DNA (W chromosomes). While the W chromosomes of E. kuehniella and G. mellonella had both components, that of B. mori appeared to lack the latter component. Our results show that CGH can be applied to obtain a first estimate of the sequence composition of sex chromosomes in species from which otherwise little is known on the molecular level.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Identification of a novel gene, MASL1, within an amplicon at 8p23.1 detected in malignant fibrous histiocytomas by comparative genomic hybridization.

We used comparative genomic hybridization to study malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFHs) from 19 patients to detect changes in the copy number of DNA sequences, along entire chromosomes. Together with losses and gains in various chromosomal regions, distinct high-level amplifications were found at six loci (4q12-21, 8p21-pter, 8q24.1-qter, 9q12-13, 12p11.2-pter, and 15q11.2-15), suggesting that those regions may contain unknown (proto) oncogenes. We focused on the 8p amplicon, where detailed characterization allowed us to determine that the minimal common amplified region lay between markers D8S1819 and D8S550 at 8p23.1. A novel gene designated MASL1 (MFH-amplified sequences with leucine-rich tandem repeats 1) was isolated from within this narrowly defined region. Expression of the MASL1 gene was enhanced significantly in MFH tumors bearing the 8p amplicon. The primary structure of its deduced product revealed an ATP/GTP-binding site, three leucine zipper domains, and a leucine-rich tandem repeat, all of which are important structural or functional elements for interactions among proteins related to the cell cycle. These features suggest that overexpression of MASL1 might well be oncogenic with respect to MFH.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Genetic imbalances in 67 synovial sarcomas evaluated by comparative genomic hybridization.

We used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to evaluate DNA sequence copy number changes in 67 synovial sarcomas of both monophasic and biphasic histological subtypes. Changes (mean among aberrant cases: 4.7 aberrations/tumor; range: 1-17), affecting most often entire chromosomes or chromosome arms, were detected in 37 sarcomas (55%). Gains and losses were distributed equally, but different chromosomes were affected with variable frequencies. The most frequent aberrations, each detected in 9-11 of 67 tumors, were gain of 8q and gain at 12q (12q14-15 and 12q23-qter), loss of 13q21-31, and loss of 3p. Other frequent changes (in 7 or 8 cases) included gains at 2p, 1q24-31, and 17q22-qter, and losses at 3cen-q23 and 10q21. High-level amplifications were seen in 7 cases. A total of 16 regions were detected. Two of them, 8p12-qter and 21q21-qter, seen in 4 and 2 tumors, respectively, were recurrent. No aberrations specific to histological subtype were identified. However, genetic changes in the monophasic tumors were more complex and numerous (mean among aberrant cases: 5.3 aberrations/tumor; range: 1-17) than in the biphasic tumors (mean: 2.5 aberrations/tumor; range: 1-5), and high-level amplifications occurred more frequently. All but 1 of the sarcomas showing high-level amplification were of the monophasic subtype. These findings may reflect differences in the pathogenesis and biological behavior of both histological subtypes of synovial sarcoma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

[Genetic screening of head-neck carcinomas using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)].

BACKGROUND: Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) is a novel cytogenetic method that allows the comprehensive analysis of a tumor genome for DNA gains and losses. METHODS: CGH was performed on genomic DNA extracted from 14 primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Equal amounts of biotin-labeled tumor DNA and digoxigenin-labeled normal reference DNA were hybridized to normal metaphase chromosomes. The tumor DNA was visualized with fluorescein (FITC) and the normal DNA with rhodamine (TRITC) and detected in a fluorescence microscope. The signal intensities of the different fluorochromes were quantitated as gray levels along the single chromosomes. The over-and underrepresented DNA segments were quantified by computation of FITC/TRITC ratio images and average ratio profiles. RESULTS: Consensus deletion regions were most frequently observed on chromosome arms 3p (14 cases), 9p (11), 13q (10), 18q (10), 5q (9), 4q (9), 4p (7), 11q (7), 6q (6), 8p (6), and 11p (6). Copy number increases were identified for chromosomes 3q (11), 16p (9), 17q (9), 19p (8), 19q (7), 22 (7), 1p (6), 8q (6), 9q (6), and 20q (6). Particularly, the 3q isochromosome formation (3p loss/3q amplification), found in 10 cases, was a basic alteration. In addition, 11 tumors showed a 11 q13 amplification. CONCLUSION: CGH analysis allows the identification of recurrent genetic alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas that will be associated with specific tumor phenotypes like metastatic behavior and prognosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Comparative genomic hybridization: practical guidelines.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.

Chromosome Aberrations↗
PubMed1996

Chromosome imbalances in papillary renal cell carcinoma and first cytogenetic data of familial cases analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization.

We used comparative genomic hybridization to analyze 17 tumor samples from 11 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including three patients with hereditary papillary RCC. Whereas the most frequent aberrations confirmed data obtained by banding analyses, copy number increases on 5q, which previously were considered characteristic of nonpapillary RCC, were identified in two cases. In two complex cases belonging to the same family, a characteristic pattern of chromosomal aberrations was found: five of the six imbalances present in the less complex case were included in the karyotype of the other case, suggesting a genetically determined mechanism resulting in genomic instability of specific chromosomes or chromosomal subregions and/or selection of specific mutations.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Comparative genomic hybridization: an overview.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a newly described molecular-cytogenetic assay that globally assays for chromosomal gains and losses in a genomic complement. In this assay, normal human metaphase chromosomes are competitively hybridized with two differentially labeled genomic DNAs (test and reference), which upon fluorescence microscopy, reveal the chromosomal locations of copy number changes in DNA sequences between the two complements. Application of CGH to DNAs extracted from fresh frozen specimens and cell lines of various tumor types has revealed a number of recurring chromosomal gains and losses that were undetected by traditional cytogenetic analysis. Few previously known sites were found to be in higher copy number, or lost by CGH, while many novel amplified regions were identified. These regions warrant further molecular genetic studies aimed at isolating the perturbed genes. Since CGH can also be performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archived tumor specimens with few modifications, gains and losses of genetic material can be determined for specimens that would otherwise be unanalyzable. Prospective and retrospective application of CGH to tumor specimens would permit correlative studies to be performed, possibly identifying diagnostic and prognostic indicators of disease. CGH may also have a future role in detection and identification of chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis and in dysmorphic anomalies.

Chromosome Mapping↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Significant hybridization differences in comparative genomic hybridization due to nucleotides used for DNA labelling and to DNA chosen for cohybridization.

OBJECTIVE: Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has been established as an informative technique in genetic analysis. However, differences in the ratio of hybridization intensities were reported for particular chromosomes, which may affect CGH results. The aim of this study was to define these differences in more detail. For this purpose, CGH results of 70 samples of bone marrow cells (BMC) with normal karyotype in conventional cytogenetics (CC) were evaluated using seven different reference DNAs and two different DNA labeling systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: CGH using fluorochrome-conjugated nucleotides for DNA labeling indicated signal deviations in 21/70 BMC samples. Deviations affected chromosomes 1 (n = 21), 2 (n = 11), 4 (n = 11), 5 (n = 9), 6 (n = 7), 7 (n = 2), 8 (n = 2), 12 (n = 5), 13 (n = 15), 14 (n = 1), 16 (n = 17), 17 (n = 11), 19 (n = 21), 20 (n = 12), and/or 22 (n = 17). None of the imbalances were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Using digoxigenin and biotin-conjugated nucleotides in exemplary cases (n = 5) led to the disappearance of the signal deviations. Repeated CGH experiments using seven different reference DNAs showed remarkable variations in the signal deviations. CONCLUSION: Hybridization differences depend not only on the hapten or fluorochrome-labeled nucleotides used for DNA labeling, but also on the reference DNA chosen. Therefore, close control of CGH experiments is mandatory, and additional techniques such as FISH should be performed to confirm the results obtained by CGH.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Correlation of DNA copy number changes to malignancy in oral squamous cell carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization].

To compare clinical and histopathological findings to tumor DNA copy number changes, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed on 18 primary oral squamous cell carcinomas. Copy number increases were most frequently observed on 8q, 3q, 13q, 11p, and 11q, while copy number decreases most frequently on 10q, 1p, 18q, 9p, and 19q. Copy number changes in relationship to WHO grading were examined with the result that DNA copy number increase on chromosome 6p23-25 was characteristically observed in the groups of Grade II and Grade III, and DNA copy number decreases on chromosomes 9p21 and 11p11-13 were observed in the same groups. Furthermore, comparison of DNA copy number changes to TNM classification indicated that the decreases on chromosomes 1p36 and 10q25-26 might be related to tumor progression. Moreover, the relationship of DNA amplification or deletion to metastasis was investigated. It was found that the majority of the metastasis-positive tumors showed increases on 3q26 and 17q12-21 and showed decreases on chromosome 18q21. The data suggested that these DNA copy number changes on each chromosome in the three categories might be associated with tumor cell differentiation, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis.

Adult↗