PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Contraception”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

A prospective study of adolescents who choose among levonorgestrel implant (Norplant), medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera), or the combined oral contraceptive pill as contraception.

OBJECTIVES: Levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) and medroxyprogesterone acetate injections (Depo-Provera) represent additional contraception options for adolescents. The purpose of this study was to examine prospectively clinical profiles among adolescents who chose one of the two long-term contraceptives compared with profiles among those who chose the combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP). METHODS: Girls who needed contraception and did not require confidentiality were presented with a contraceptive menu consisting of Norplant (n = 58), Depo-Provera (n = 66), or OCP (n = 75). At baseline and follow-up visits over 6 months, patients were interviewed regarding gynecologic history, side effect symptoms, and satisfaction. The average age of subjects was 15.5 years (range 11 to 20 years); 66% were African-American and 34% white. RESULTS: Significantly more teens who chose Depo-Provera (73%) reported having used some method of birth control previously than those selecting either Norplant (30%) or OCP (26%). Adolescents who chose either Norplant (34%) or Depo-Provera (43%) were significantly more likely to have been pregnant previously than those choosing OCP (12%). Those selecting Depo-Provera were significantly more likely to report a history of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (42%) than those in the other two contraceptive groups (22%). Prevalences of reported recent depression and fatigue before initiation of treatment were high, exceeding 35% across the three groups. A total of 105 and 40 adolescents were assessed at 3 and 6 months, respectively. At follow-up, more than 80% of OCP users maintained regular menstrual cycles, whereas over 80% of those choosing Norplant or Depo-Provera had disrupted cycles. Complaints of nausea and dizziness among Norplant users and fatigue among Depo-Provera and OCP users increased significantly between the baseline and follow-up visits. Reports of local reactions to the Norplant device were common but not clinically significant. Blood pressure readings, facial acne, and body mass index did not change over time in any treatment group. Subjects in the Norplant and Depo-Provera groups appreciated freedom from daily compliance to maintain contraceptive effectiveness and the "hidden" nature of the method. Appointment compliance at the end of 6 months was 78% for Depo-Provera, 40% for Norplant, and 46% for OCP. CONCLUSIONS: The implant and injection forms of contraception appear to be especially popular among girls with previous pregnancies or birth control use. The common occurrences of medical symptoms and sexually transmitted diseases before initiation of therapy underscore the importance of baseline evaluation. Norplant users may be warned about nausea and dizziness as well as minor local symptoms around the insertion site and unpredictable uterine bleeding patterns. Adolescent patients choosing Depo-Provera may expect amenorrhea by the end of 6 months of therapy along with possible fatigue. Early intervention may be needed with adolescents who choose Norplant or OCP to encourage better compliance with follow-up appointments.

Adolescent↗

Effects of hormonal contraceptives on milk volume and infant growth. WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction Task force on oral contraceptives.

WHO conducted a three-centre study in Hungary and Thailand to evaluate the effects of hormonal contraception on lactation and infant growth. Women choosing oral contraceptives were randomly assigned to a combined oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms levonorgestrel (N = 86) or a progestin-only preparation containing 75 micrograms dl-norgestrel (N = 85). Identical packaging and treatment schedules allowed double-blind observation. One-hundred-and-eleven women using no contraception or non-hormonal methods acted as controls. In the two Thai centres 59 women using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate formed an additional comparison group. All subjects were healthy women with normal deliveries, whose infants had normal birth weights and satisfactory growth in the neonatal period. Breast milk volume was determined by pump expression using standardized procedures. Information was obtained on nursing frequency and supplementation, infant growth and morbidity. Pretreatment observations at 6 weeks post-partum were used as a baseline, and subjects were followed-up at 9, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks post-partum. Women using combined oral contraceptives had a decline in milk volume within 6 weeks of initiating treatment, whereas no significant decrease was observed in the other treatment groups. After 18 weeks of treatment, combined oral contraceptive users experienced a 41.9% decline in milk volume, compared to 12.0% with progestin-only minipills and 6.1% in the non-hormonal controls. The prevalence of complementary feeding and withdrawals due to inadequate milk supply were comparable in the four treatment groups. However, data were not available on the daily amounts of complementary feeds. There were no significant differences in growth of infants between treatment groups. Thus, women may have compensated for declines in milk volume by more supplementary feeding or by more prolonged and intense suckling episodes. We conclude that 30 micrograms estrogen-containing combined oral contraceptives impair milk secretion, but in the selected healthy group of mothers and children studied with the prevailing level of supplementary feeding, this did not adversely affect infant growth.

Adult↗

Performance of contraceptive patch compared with oral contraceptive pill in a high-risk population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential benefit of the transdermal contraceptive patch compared with the oral contraceptive pill for its acceptability and compliance in a population at high risk for future unintended pregnancies and abortions. METHODS: Assessment of the contraceptive patch and pill was prospective. We gathered information on women undergoing contraceptive counseling at three Planned Parenthood clinics. Discontinuation, adverse effects, and pregnancy outcomes were catalogued. The primary outcome was time to discontinuation of the patch or pill. Survival analyses with life tables and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess acceptability and compliance. Pearl indices were calculated for both the pill and patch. RESULTS: A total of 1,230 contraceptive-naïve women were identified. Subjects were a racially diverse group of primarily single women. Eighty-nine percent of the study population met our definition of being at high risk for a future unintended pregnancy or pregnancy termination. Loss to follow-up was higher among patch users (45.2% versus 29.5%, P<.001). Verified continued use beyond the first three cycles was lower with a patch (67% versus 89%, P<.001). Skin irritation and site reactions were the treatment-limiting factor for 3.3% of patch users. The 3,206 cycles captured in this study resulted in a Pearl index of 3.62 for the pill and 14.84 for the patch. Differences in the baseline demographic and contraceptive practices may account for this discrepancy although, in multivariate analysis, patch users continued to do worse. CONCLUSION: In this high-risk population, we found the contraceptive patch to have lower continuation and effectiveness rates. Further research should investigate factors contributing to poorer real-world performance by the patch.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

A comparative analysis of the modification of sexual desire of users of oral hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of oral hormonal contraceptives (OCs) and the use of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) on the modification of sexual desire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study of 1073 women using OCs or an IUD at the Family Planning Center 'Marina Alta' in Alicante, Spain. In order to evaluate the relative risk regarding the decrease in libido attributed to each contraceptive method, a logistic regression analysis was undertaken which considered the factors of age adjustment, level of studies, family planning information, relationship with partner, age when sexual relationships were initiated, parity, contraceptive method previously used and the duration of use of the contraceptive method. RESULTS: No differences in the decrease of sexual desire were observed between the use of the OC and IUD (odds ratio (OR) 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-2.49), yet differences were noted, however, in relation to age (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.10). Although these differences were not statistically significant, a high level of awareness regarding family planning was shown to increase sexual desire when compared to a lower level of information on this subject (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41-1.01). Sexual desire was seen to decrease if the quality of the relationship with the partner was average (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.36-3.69) or poor (OR 4.69; 95% CI 1.93-11.4). Nulliparous women showed a greater decrease in sexual desire in relation to women who had already given birth (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.00-2.47). Sexual desire was greater if the contraceptive method had already been in use for 6-12 months (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.17-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Sexual desire does not vary in relation to the use of OCs or IUDs, yet it does decrease with age, in nulliparous women and in those with an average or poor relationship with their partner. Furthermore, sexual desire shows an increase between the first 6 and 12 months of contraceptive treatment.

Adolescent↗

Intention to use contraceptives and subsequent contraceptive behavior in Morocco.

In this article, the relationship between stated intention to use contraceptives and subsequent use during a three-year period in Morocco is examined. Longitudinal data are drawn from two Demographic and Health Surveys: the 1992 Morocco DHS and the 1995 Morocco Panel Survey. Reported contraceptive intentions in 1992 have a strong predictive effect on subsequent contraceptive use even after controlling for other characteristics of respondents, and the strength of the effect is second only to that of previous contraceptive use. Women who in 1992 said they intended to use contraceptives in the future but did not do so are the most likely to have had an unmet need for contraception in 1995. Weakly held fertility preferences reported by some of the women surveyed in 1992 appear to have been a contributing factor in the subsequent failure of these women to act upon their intention to practice contraception.

Adolescent↗

The menstrual cycle from a bio-behavioral approach: a comparison of oral contraceptive and non-contraceptive users.

The purpose of the present study was to clarify the effects of the menstrual cycle on: (1) accuracy and simple reaction time in a problem-solving situation; (2) academic performance; (3) identify corresponding cyclic changes in a set of psychophysiological measures during rest/test conditions; and (4) to compare oral contraceptive with non-oral contraceptive users. Eight volunteer females, 4 normally cyclic and 4 oral contraceptive users, reported once weekly throughout two menstrual cycles during which changes in blood pressure, heart rate, skin temperature, finger pulse amplitude, and verbal reaction time were monitored. Differences in verbal reaction time were found between oral contraceptive users and non-users over phases of the cycle, the users being significantly slower during menstrual and premenstrual phases. It was also observed that all subjects reacted slower in the menstrual and ovulatory phases during cycle one, although no differences were found during cycle two. Skin temperature changes between groups occurred during the postovulatory phase of cycle two, the control group having shown a much greater increase than oral contraceptive users. These results indicated a suppressive influence of oral contraceptives which appeared to affect cognitive rather than motor responses, and that these effects were residual when no pills were taken menstrually and premenstrually. Also indicated was the finding that although a 28-day cycle of menstrual events exists, periodicity of these events may be reflected in a much larger cycle non-currently defined.

Achievement↗

Bleeding patterns of women using Lunelle monthly contraceptive injections (medroxyprogesterone acetate and estradiol cypionate injectable suspension) compared with those of women using Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 (norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol triphasic) or other oral contraceptives.

Persistent and/or unpredictable bleeding is a common reason for discontinuation of hormonal contraceptive methods. An open-label, nonrandomized, parallel, controlled study compared the efficacy, safety, and cycle control of the new, highly efficacious monthly injectable contraceptive containing 25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and 5 mg estradiol cypionate (E(2)C) (MPA/E(2)C) (Lunelle Monthly Contraceptive Injection) with that of the frequently used norethindrone 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 mg/0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol (NET/EE) triphasic oral contraceptive (Ortho-Novum 7/7/7). This report directly compares the bleeding patterns of women on MPA/E(2)C to those of women on NET/EE and untreated women. Overall, breakthrough bleeding occurred less frequently in women using MPA/E(2)C than in women using NET/EE (p < or =0.01). However, more women using MPA/E(2)C experienced amenorrhea/missed periods than those on NET/EE (p < or =0.01). In addition, the percentage of women experiencing breakthrough bleeding or amenorrhea while using other oral contraceptives is compared to that of women using MPA/E(2)C. A rapidly reversible method, MPA/E(2)C, combines the high contraceptive efficacy of surgical sterilization with the convenience of monthly administration. These data suggest that, for a large proportion of women, MPA/E(2)C offers predictability in bleeding patterns comparable to or greater than that experienced by ovulatory untreated women or those using combination oral contraceptives.

Adolescent↗

Can women's childbearing and contraceptive intentions predict contraceptive demand? Findings from a longitudinal study in Central India.

CONTEXT: To predict the need for contraceptive services, family planning program managers often rely on levels of unmet need derived from measures of childbearing intentions. However, women's intention to use a method has not received as much attention as a measure of contraceptive demand. METHODS: A survey was conducted in 1999 in rural Madhya Pradesh, India, among a subsample of women who had participated in the 1992-1993 National Family Health Survey (NFHS). The women's childbearing and contraceptive behaviors were compared with the intentions they had stated in the NFHS, and logistic regression was performed to analyze the association between socioeconomic and demographic variables and inconsistent behavior. RESULTS: Among women who were fecund and married in 1992-1993, 29% of those who intended to have children and 61% of those who intended not to have children failed to adhere to their intentions by 1999. Furthermore, 51% of women who were not practicing contraception at the time of the NFHS but planned to do so acted against their intention by 1999, as did 29% of those who planned not to use a method. NFHS respondents who intended both not to have children and to use a method were more likely than others to have used a method by 1999 (63% vs. 25-41%). Age and history of child death were key factors associated with inconsistency between women's intentions and behavior. CONCLUSIONS: In India, use of both contraceptive and childbearing intentions predicts contraceptive demand better than use of either indicator alone, and may thus help program planners estimate future demand for contraceptive services.

Adolescent↗

U.S. insurance coverage of contraceptives and the impact of contraceptive coverage mandates, 2002.

CONTEXT: In 1993, coverage of reversible contraception by U.S. health insurance plans was extremely low. Little is known about how coverage has changed since then, particularly in response to state mandates. METHODS: In 2001-2002, a nationally representative sample of 205 health care insurers responded to a survey about coverage of reproductive health care services in "typical" employment-based managed care plans (excluding self-insured plans). Data were analyzed to compare coverage in states with and without contraceptive coverage mandates, and to show trends in coverage between 1993 and 2002. RESULTS: In 2002, almost every reversible contraceptive service and supply studied was covered by at least 89% of typical plans; 86% of plans covered the five leading prescription methods (the diaphragm, one- and three-month injectables, the IUD and oral contraceptives). Coverage of each contraceptive service and supply studied was higher in 2002 than in 1993 (78-97% vs. 32-59%). Plans in states with mandates were significantly more likely to cover the five leading prescription methods (87-92%, depending on type of plan) than were those designed locally in states without mandates (47-61%). Between 1993 and 2002, state mandates were estimated to account for 30% and 40% of the increase in coverage of oral contraceptives and the three-month injectable, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage of reversible contraception--and by extension, choice within a range of covered methods--has increased substantially since 1993, in part because of state mandates. This state-by-state approach, however, has inherent limitations that can best be dealt with at the federal level.

Contraception↗

[Contraceptive methods and adequacy of hormonal oral contraceptive use in the city of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 1992-1999].

A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess contraceptive methods and the adequacy of oral contraceptive use by women aged 20 to 49 years in the city of Pelotas. The results were compared with another cross-sectional study performed in 1992. A sample was randomly selected, including 766 women aged 20 to 49 years. Some 495 of the sample (64.6%) used a contraceptive method, in the following order: oral contraceptives (55.4%), surgical sterilization (22.2%), condoms (10,5%), and IUD (7.7%). Among users of oral contraceptives, 62 (22.2%) had some contraindication. Incorrect use of contraceptive methods was associated with age but not with socioeconomic status. As compared to the previous study, there was a reduction in the use of oral contraceptives. Meanwhile, other methods such as surgical sterilization, condoms, and IUD were used more frequently than in 1992.

Adult↗

Recent experience with and future directions of contraceptive implants and injectable contraceptives.

Subdermal implantable contraception has been the most important addition to contraceptive technology in the past 2 decades. The Norplant system is only the first of a new family of long acting methods of high effectiveness, high acceptability, and prompt reversibility. The main advantage of the second generation implant systems, to be available soon, is the reduction in the number of implants, which greatly facilitates insertion and removal. However, great improvement in bleeding control is not to be expected. Large and carefully designed epidemiological studies have contributed to clear the main objections to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) as an injectable contraceptive. New progestin-only, long acting injectables are being tested, but significant improvements over existing methods are difficult to foresee, although every alternative is welcome. Monthly combined injectables have been in great demand, at least in China and Latin America, because of better bleeding control. Improved combined monthly injectables, less estrogenic and more progestin dominated, have been developed and are being introduced in several countries and should soon replace the old monthly injectables. Contraceptive implants and injectables have shown to be an important addition to the contraceptive options available to women throughout both the developing and developed world.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

The progestin-only oral contraceptive--its place in postpartum contraception.

The progestin-only oral contraceptive (POC) is not a widely-used method of contraception, possibly due to competition from other contemporary contraceptive methods or misunderstanding and prejudices among clients and/or service providers. Because of its underuse, the POC, as a contraceptive method, is under-studied. This article evaluates the general merits of the POC and its disadvantages relative to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and other contraceptive methods, specifically during the postpartum period and particularly for breastfeeding women. We find that the POC appears to be a safe and acceptable contraceptive method for postpartum women who are fully or nearly fully breastfeeding at six months postpartum or when menstruation returns. The POC could be considered for use at any time by non-breastfeeding postpartum women. The need for empirical studies of the POC is also discussed.

Contraception↗

Predicting male and female contraceptive behavior: a discriminant analysis of groups high, moderate, and low in contraceptive effectiveness.

An exploratory, multivariate study was carried out to assess (a) whether three contraceptive-effectiveness groups (high, moderate, and low) could be differentiated on the basis of variables that have been theoretically and empirically associated with contraceptive behavior and (b) whether an identified set of discriminating variables could accurately classify sexually active college students into these groups. Three hundred sixty-five sexually active, never-married college students (211 males and 154 females) completed instruments measuring variables related to contraception. Four separate discriminant analyses were performed, one for each sex for both their initial sexual encounter and their current sexual interactions. Discrimination and classification of the three contraceptive groups for both males' and females' initial sexual experience was not very successful. Moderate discrimination was achieved for the female current sexual activity subsample and good discrimination and classification was made for the currently sexually active male subsample. The results are discussed in terms of the implications of the findings for understanding contraceptive behavior of males and females, problems with the dependent variable of contraceptive use, and the mounting evidence that emotional orientation to sexuality influences contraceptive behavior.

Adult↗

Contraception 2000: lunelle, an injectable combination contraceptive option.

Contraceptive choices for women in the United States will soon expand with the expected Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval (in early summer 2000) of a once-a-month injectable combination contraceptive. Containing 25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate and 5 mg estradiol cypionate (MPA/E2C) (Lunelletrade mark/Lunellatrade mark, Pharmacia and Upjohn, Peapack, NJ), this monthly injectable method combines the convenience and contraceptive efficacy of longacting steroid methods with the cycle control, return to fertility, and side effect profile more typical of combination low-dose oral contraceptives. The introduction of this novel contraceptive will expand the number of safe, convenient, and effective contraceptives, and it may be used and accepted by women who are not or have not been inclined to use an available reversible contraceptive method in a correct and consistent manner.

Contraceptive Agents, Female↗

Continuous versus cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception: systematic Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: With the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of a combination oral contraceptive that causes a withdrawal bleed every 3 months instead of monthly, avoidance of menstruation through extended or continuous administration (>28 days of active pills) of combined oral contraceptives may become more commonplace for reasons of personal preference rather than limited to treatment of menstrual-associated medical disorders. METHODS: The review aimed to compare contraceptive efficacy, compliance, continuation, satisfaction, bleeding profiles, and menstrual symptoms of combined oral contraceptives with continuous dosing (>28 days of active pills) versus traditional cyclic dosing (21 days of active pills and 7 days of placebo). We searched five computerized databases as well as reference lists of relevant articles for randomized controlled trials (RCT) using continuous or extended combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible articles. RESULTS: Six RCT met inclusion criteria and were of good quality. Contraceptive efficacy and compliance were similar between groups. Discontinuation overall, and for bleeding problems, was not uniformly higher in either group. When studied, participants reported high satisfaction with both dosing regimens. Five out of the six studies found that bleeding patterns were either equivalent or improved with continuous-dosing regimens. The continuous-dosing group had greater improvement of menstrual-associated symptoms (headaches, genital irritation, tiredness, bloating, and menstrual pain). CONCLUSIONS: The variations in pill type and time-interval for continuous dosing make direct comparisons between regimens unfeasible. To allow for comparisons, future studies should choose a previously researched pill and dosing regimen. More attention needs to be directed towards participant satisfaction and menstruation-associated symptoms.

Adult↗

The contraceptive profile of a new oral contraceptive with antimineralocorticoid and antiandrogenic effects.

Yasmin (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany), a new oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol combined with 3 mg drospirenone, effectively inhibits ovulation, as demonstrated by measurement of plasma hormone levels (follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol and progesterone), and echographic evaluation of follicular ripening. Like other low-dose oral contraceptives, the combination of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone markedly limits cervical function, spinnbarkeit and degree of crystallization, resulting in a hostile environment for sperm penetration. Two large, randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical studies have compared the contraceptive efficacy of ethinylestradiol/drospirenone with that of Marvelon, a well-established contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol plus 150 microg desogestrel. Both preparations provided effective contraception and good cycle control. There were no negative effects on hemostatic parameters, lipids and carbohydrate metabolism. However, in both studies, ethinylestradiol/drospirenone had a more favorable effect on body weight than ethinylestradiol/desogestrel, with mean body weight remaining lower in the ethinylestradiol/ drospirenone group, the difference between the two preparations being statistically significant. Pre-existing acne and seborrhea were improved by ethinylestradiol/ drospirenone and blood pressure was essentially unchanged. These studies show that ethinylestradiol/drospirenone provides effective oral contraception, excellent cycle control and good tolerability, with effects on body weight and skin condition that are likely to confer a significant beneficial effect on compliance, especially in women with a tendency to gain weight under oral contraceptives due to water retention.

Androstenes↗

[Extended oestrogen-progestin contraceptive regimens: towards a contraception without menses].

Women's attitude concerning menstruations is changing towards achieving extended cycles with few or even suppressed menses, in view of the unpleasant perimenstrual bleeding, pain and discomfort pattern that may accompany menstruation. Use of combined oral estrogen-progestin contraception in extended "cycles" of 3, 6 and 12 or more months is now under active study. Extended cycle contraception is abided by a better compliance than conventional cycle contraception with ensuing optimized contraceptive effectiveness. Hypothetically, transdermal or transvaginal combined contraception could be used in extended cycles. Tolerance is comparable for both methods and unpredicted bleeding, initially more frequent during long cycle treatment tends to become less frequent after about 6 months a compared with conventional cycles. Usual safety parameters appear to be similar under both contraceptive modalities. Comfort and well being brought by extended cycle use (5 to 10 times fewer days of bloating or perimenstrual pain) allow to estimate that, according to acceptability studies, 10 to 40 percent of women of reproductive age would currently choose extended cycle contraception.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Oral contraception, mechanical contraception, and carbohydrate and lipid metabolism: a two-year study.

The carbohydrate and lipid metabolism of 100 women using an oral contraceptive (0.5 mg norgestrel + 0.05 mg ethinyl estradiol) and of 96 women using mechanical contraceptives was monitored over a 2-year period. The women had been screened for factors known to adversely affect carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Two-hour oral glucose tolerance tests were performed at 6-month intervals during the study; serum insulin was determined at the same intervals in half the women. Triglycerides, total cholesterol, free fatty acids, and body weight were also measured. The study showed no significant differences in lipid metabolism nor in weight gain between women using oral or mechanical contraceptives. After 6 months the fasting glucose of women using oral contraceptives was significantly decreased; at 120 minutes, glucose and insulin levels were significantly increased in comparison to women using mechanical contraceptives. A greater percentage of oral contraceptive users had borderline-abnormal oral glucose tolerance tests but the abnormalities did not persist in the same individuals during the study. The incidence of a pathological oral glucose tolerance with oral contraceptives was 1%.

Body Weight↗