PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA Mismatch Repair”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

A role for DNA mismatch repair in sensing and responding to fluoropyrimidine damage.

The phenomenon of damage tolerance, whereby cells incur DNA lesions that are nonlethal, largely ignored, but highly mutagenic, appears to play a key role in carcinogenesis. Typically, these lesions are generated by alkylation of DNA or incorporation of base analogues. This tolerance is usually a result of the loss of specific DNA repair processes, most often DNA mismatch repair (MMR). The availability of genetically matched MMR-deficient and -corrected cell systems allows dissection of the consequences of this unrepaired damage in carcinogenesis as well as the elucidation of cell cycle checkpoint responses and cell death consequences. Recent data indicate that MMR plays an important role in detecting damage caused by fluorinated pyrimidines (FPs) and represents a repair system that is probably not the primary system for detecting damage caused by these agents, but may be an important system for correcting key mutagenic lesions that could initiate carcinogenesis. In fact, clinical studies have shown that there is no benefit of FP-based adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients exhibiting microsatellite instability, a hallmark of MMR deficiency. MMR-mediated damage tolerance and futile cycle repair processes are discussed, as well as possible strategies using FPs to exploit these systems for improved anticancer therapy.

Animals↗

Contributions by MutL homologues Mlh3 and Pms2 to DNA mismatch repair and tumor suppression in the mouse.

Germ line DNA mismatch repair mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 underlie the vast majority of hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. Four mammalian homologues of Escherichia coli MutL heterodimerize to form three distinct complexes: MLH1/PMS2, MLH1/MLH3, and MLH1/PMS1. Although MLH1/PMS2 is generally thought to have the major MutL activity, the precise contributions of each MutL heterodimer to mismatch repair functions are poorly understood. Here, we show that Mlh3 contributes to mechanisms of tumor suppression in the mouse. Mlh3 deficiency alone causes microsatellite instability, impaired DNA-damage response, and increased gastrointestinal tumor susceptibility. Furthermore, Mlh3;Pms2 double-deficient mice have tumor susceptibility, shorter life span, microsatellite instability, and DNA-damage response phenotypes that are indistinguishable from Mlh1-deficient mice. Our data support previous results from budding yeast that show partial functional redundancy between MLH3 and PMS2 orthologues for mutation avoidance and show a role for Mlh3 in gastrointestinal and extragastrointestinal tumor suppression. The data also suggest a mechanistic basis for the more severe mismatch repair-related phenotypes and cancer susceptibility in Mlh1- versus Mlh3- or Pms2-deficient mice. Contributions by both MLH1/MLH3 and MLH1/PMS2 complexes to mechanisms of mismatch repair-mediated tumor suppression, therefore, provide an explanation why, among MutL homologues, only germ line mutations in MLH1 are common in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

DNA mismatch repair system. Classical and fresh roles.

The molecular mechanisms of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system have been uncovered over the last decade, especially in prokaryotes. The results obtained for prokaryotic MMR proteins have provided a framework for the study of the MMR system in eukaryotic organisms, such as yeast, mouse and human, because the functions of MMR proteins have been conserved during evolution from bacteria to humans. However, mutations in eukaryotic MMR genes result in pleiotropic phenotypes in addition to MMR defects, suggesting that eukaryotic MMR proteins have evolved to gain more diverse and specific roles in multicellular organisms. Here, we summarize recent advances in the understanding of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic MMR systems and describe various new functions of MMR proteins that have been intensively researched during the last few years, including DNA damage surveillance and diversification of antibodies.

Animals↗

An Msh2 point mutation uncouples DNA mismatch repair and apoptosis.

Mutations in the human DNA mismatch repair gene MSH2 are associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer as well as a significant proportion of sporadic colorectal cancer. The inactivation of MSH2 results in the accumulation of somatic mutations in the genome of tumor cells and resistance to the genotoxic effects of a variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Here we show that the DNA repair and DNA damage-induced apoptosis functions of Msh2 can be uncoupled using mice that carry the G674A missense mutation in the conserved ATPase domain. As a consequence, although Msh2(G674A) homozygous mutant mice are highly tumor prone, the onset of tumorigenesis is delayed as compared with Msh2-null mice. In addition, tumors that carry the mutant allele remain responsive to treatment with a chemotherapeutic agent. Our results indicate that Msh2-mediated apoptosis is an important component of tumor suppression and that certain MSH2 missense mutations can cause mismatch repair deficiency while retaining the signaling functions that confer sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents.

Alanine↗

Measurement of DNA mismatch repair activity in live cells.

Loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) function leads to the development and progression of certain cancers. Currently, assays for DNA MMR activity involve the use of cell extracts and are technically challenging and costly. Here, we report a rapid, less labor-intensive method that can quantitatively measure MMR activity in live cells. A G-G or T-G mismatch was introduced into the ATG start codon of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene. Repair of the G-G or T-G mismatch to G-C or T-A, respectively, in the heteroduplex plasmid generates a functional EGFP gene expression. The heteroduplex plasmid and a similarly constructed homoduplex plasmid were transfected in parallel into the same cell line and the number of green cells counted by flow cytometry. Relative EGFP expression was calculated as the total fluorescence intensity of cells transfected with the heteroduplex construct divided by that of cells transfected with the homoduplex construct. We have tested several cell lines from both MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient groups using this method, including a colon carcinoma cell line HCT116 with defective hMLH1 gene and a derivative complemented by transient transfection with hMLH1 cDNA. Results show that MMR-proficient cells have significantly higher EGFP expression than MMR-deficient cells, and that transient expression of hMLH1 alone can elevate MMR activity in HCT116 cells. This method is potentially useful in comparing and monitoring MMR activity in live cells under various growth conditions.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Analysis of DNA mismatch repair gene expression and mutations in thyroid tumours.

Alterations of DNA mismatch repair genes, primarily demonstrated in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinomas, were reported to be of relevance for the progression of several sporadic tumours. In this study, the expression and mutations of MLH1, MSH2, PMS1 and PMS2 in a panel of thyroid tumours, including nodular hyperplasia, follicular adenomas and carcinomas, were investigated. The expressions of MLH1, MSH2 and PMS1 were generally higher in malignant tumours than in benign lesions (p < 0.01). This observation can find potential diagnostic application in the differentiation of follicular adenomas from follicullar carcinomas of the thyroid. No point mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 (exon 12, 13) and MLH1 (exon 15, 16) were found.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Clinicopathologic significance of defective DNA mismatch repair in endometrial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Defective DNA mismatch repair is commonly present in sporadic manifestations of gastrointestinal, endometrial, and other cancers. The pathognomonic molecular manifestation of this repair defect is microsatellite instability (MSI). Here, we test the hypothesis that MSI predicts the clinicopathologic features of endometrial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 473 patients treated for endometrial carcinoma at this institution was identified. All cases were reviewed by a gynecologic pathologist, and clinical information was abstracted from medical records. Using consensus criteria, DNA samples from nontumor and tumor tissue pairs were genotyped for MSI. Associations between MSI status and pathologic and clinical variables were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-three (20%) of 473 tumors were MSI+. In the MSI+ tumor group compared with the MSI- tumor group, the proportion of advanced compared with early-stage tumors was higher (92% v 81%; P = .01), as was the proportion of tumors of endometrioid compared with nonendometrioid histologic subtype (94% v 23%; P = .001), and the proportion of tumors with myometrial invasion compared with those with none (92% v 78%; P = .01). By multivariate analyses, disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7) and disease-specific survival (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.8) were significantly improved in patients with MSI+ tumors. CONCLUSION: In endometrial carcinoma, the presence of MSI was independently associated with a more favorable clinical outcome.

DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders↗

XPC lymphoblastoid cells defective in the hMutSalpha DNA mismatch repair complex exhibit normal sensitivity to UVC radiation and normal transcription-coupled excision repair of DNA cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers.

Nucleotide excision (NER) is generally considered to comprise two partially distinct subpathways. Global genomic repair (GGR) removes damage from the genome overall and transcription-coupled repair (TCR) selectively excises damage from transcribed DNA. Cells from individuals belonging to xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) complementation group C are defective in GGR but retain a functional TCR pathway. DNA mismatch repair (MMR) corrects replication errors but can also process DNA damage. It has been suggested that the essential hMutSalpha and hMutLalpha MMR protein complexes are also required for effective excision of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) by TCR. We have combined an MMR and an XPC defect in a human lymphoblastoid cell line. The MMR-defective XPC cells were defective in the hMutSalpha mismatch recognition complex that comprises hMSH2 and hMSH6. They were not detectably more sensitive to killing by UV than their MMR proficient counterparts and were able to excise CPDs from an actively transcribed DNA strand. We conclude efficient TCR does not depend on a functional hMutSalpha complex.

Alkylating Agents↗

Microsatellite instability as a predictor of a mutation in a DNA mismatch repair gene in familial colorectal cancer.

Germline alterations in human DNA mismatch repair genes are associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Mutation analysis of the genes reveals carriers with a high risk of colorectal cancer, who will benefit from surveillance. We wanted to find the best predictive parameter of a germline mutation in those genes among patients with familial colorectal cancer. Affected members from a total of 83 unrelated colorectal cancer families previously analyzed for mutations in MSH2 and MLH1 were used to evaluate different parameters' ability to predict a germline mutation. We studied various clinical criteria such as family structure, age of onset, and prevalence of endometrial cancer, as well as microsatellite instability in the tumors from the families. In total, 124 tumors from 59 of the families were tested for microsatellite instability (MSI) using PCR-based mono- and dinucleotide markers to establish whether the families could be scored as MSI-positive or -negative. The finding of MSI-positive tumors in a family was the best predictor of a germline mutation, and was found in 73% of the MSI-positive, but in less than 3% of the MSI-negative families (P < 0.0001). In contrast, MSI in unselected colorectal cancer is not as useful, since most of these MSI-positive tumors are sporadic. The finding of microsatellite instability in colorectal tumors seems efficient enough even to select those with germline mutations among families fulfilling HNPCC Amsterdam criteria, once used in identification of the DNA mismatch repair genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 27:17-25, 2000.

Adult↗

DNA mismatch repair genes in renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: DNA mismatch repair is one of the correcting mechanisms that preserves genetic stability during replication or chemically induced damage. We hypothesized that genetic instability is due to a defect in mismatch repair genes in renal cell carcinoma. To test this hypothesis mismatch repair genes hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hPMS1 and hPMS2 were analyzed in renal cell carcinoma cell lines and tissues. We further investigated the mechanisms of inactivation of these genes through CpG methylation pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 41 fresh normal and renal cell carcinoma samples for gene and protein expression of various mismatch repair genes (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hPMS1 and hPMS2) using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry techniques. To investigate the mechanisms of inactivation of these genes cultured renal cancer cell lines (A498, Caki-1 and Caki-2) were treated with demethylating agent (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine), and mismatch repair genes and protein expression were analyzed before and after treatment. RESULTS: hMLH1 and hMSH3 mRNA expression was significantly lower in renal cell carcinoma tissues than in normal tissues. Similarly nuclear positivity of hMSH3 was significantly lower in renal cell carcinoma tissues than in normal tissues. Moreover, at the mRNA and protein levels hMSH3 expression in high grade renal cell carcinomas was significantly lower than in low grade tumors. However, there was no significant difference in hMSH2, hMSH6, hPMS1 or hPMS2 expression in renal cell carcinoma tissues versus normal kidney tissues. In renal cancer cell lines demethylation with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine did not affect the expression of hMLH1 and hMSH3 genes. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first comprehensive study demonstrating the down-regulation of mismatch repair genes in renal cell carcinoma. Selective defect in some mismatch repair genes can cause genomic instability and activate the malignant transformation as well as the progression of renal cell carcinoma.

Azacitidine↗

The role of DNA mismatch repair in drug resistance.

Loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) has been observed in a variety of human cancers. In addition to predisposing to oncogenesis, loss of MMR activity is of concern with respect to the use of chemotherapeutic agents to treat established tumors. Loss of MMR results in drug resistance directly by impairing the ability of the cell to detect DNA damage and activate apoptosis and indirectly by increasing the mutation rate throughout the genome. The MMR proteins are involved in mediating the activation of cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. MMR-deficient cells have been reported to be resistant to the methylating agents procarbazine and temozolomide, the alkylating agent busulfan, the platinum-containing drugs cisplatin and carboplatin, the antimetabolite 6-thioguanine, and the topoisomerase II inhibitors etoposide and doxorubicin. In the case of cisplatin, busulfan, temozolomide, and procarbazine, the degree of resistance has been shown to be sufficient to produce a large difference in clinical responsiveness in vivo in tumor model systems. The available preclinical data suggest that tumors that contain a significant fraction of cells deficient in MMR will demonstrate reduced responsiveness to specific drugs. The challenge now is to assess the clinical significance of the presence of deficient cells in tumors and to discover drugs that retain activity against MMR-deficient cells.

Alkylating Agents↗

Roles of the DNA mismatch repair genes in colorectal tumorigenesis.

A rapid increase in our understanding of the basic mechanisms involved in the genesis of colorectal cancer has occurred. Important factors include the activation of oncogenes, the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and the inactivation of DNA repair systems. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) has been linked to germ-line mutations that inactivate one allele of a DNA mismatch repair gene, which pre-disposes affected individuals to a high frequency of early-onset cancer. We have developed a cellular model to study HNPCC using the DNA mismatch repair-deficient colon cancer cell line HCT116 and corrected the genetic deficiency by chromosome transfer. Human chromosome 3 corrected all manifestations of DNA mismatch repair deficiency in the cell line and restored sensitivity to the toxic effects of certain DNA alkylating agents. Data suggest that the DNA mismatch repair genes not only participate in the recognition and repair of DNA mismatches during new strand synthesis but may also signal cell cycle arrest in the face of overwhelming DNA damage. Additional functions for the DNA mismatch repair genes in the maintenance of DNA replicative fidelity are being studied.

Alleles↗

Partial reconstitution of human DNA mismatch repair in vitro: characterization of the role of human replication protein A.

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical genome-stabilization system. However, the molecular mechanism of MMR in human cells remains obscure because many of the components have not yet been identified. Using a functional in vitro reconstitution system, this study identified three HeLa cell fractions essential for in vitro MMR. These fractions divide human MMR into two distinct stages: mismatch-provoked excision and repair synthesis. In vitro dissection of the MMR reaction and crucial intermediates elucidated biochemical functions of individual fractions in human MMR and identified hitherto unknown functions of human replication protein A (hRPA) in MMR. Thus, one fraction carries out nick-directed and mismatch-dependent excision; the second carries out DNA repair synthesis and DNA ligation; and the third provides hRPA, which plays multiple roles in human MMR by protecting the template DNA strand from degradation, enhancing repair excision, and facilitating repair synthesis. It is anticipated that further analysis of these fractions will identify additional MMR components and enable the complete reconstitution of the human MMR pathway with purified proteins.

Base Pair Mismatch↗

Resistance to topoisomerase poisons due to loss of DNA mismatch repair.

Sporadic breast carcinomas demonstrate microsatellite instability, reflecting the presence of DNA mismatch repair-deficient cells, in about one fourth of cases at the time of diagnosis. Loss of DNA mismatch repair has been reported to result in resistance not only to cisplatin and alkylating agents but also to the topoisomerase II poison doxorubicin, suggesting an association between DNA mismatch repair and topoisomerase II poison-induced cytotoxicity. Our study investigates the relationship between loss of MSH2 or MLH1 function and sensitivity to the topoisomerase I and II poisons, and to the taxanes, 2 classes of cytotoxic drugs commonly used in breast cancer. Two pairs of cell lines proficient and deficient in mismatch repair due to loss of either MSH2 or MLH1 function were used. Loss of either MSH2 or MLH1 function resulted in resistance to the topoisomerase II poisons doxorubicin, epirubicin and mitoxantrone, whereas only loss of MLH1 function was associated with low-level resistance to the topoisomerase I poisons camptothecin and topotecan. In contrast, there was no resistance to docetaxel and paclitaxel. Our data support the hypothesis that both MSH2 and MLH1 are involved in topoisomerase II poison-mediated cytotoxicity, whereas only MLH1 is involved in topoisomerase I poison-mediated cytotoxicity. Since our study shows that loss of DNA mismatch repair does not result in resistance to the taxanes, these drugs can be recommended for use in breast cancer deficient in mismatch repair.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

DNA mismatch repair pathway defects in the pathogenesis and evolution of myeloma.

Genetic instability is a prominent feature in multiple myeloma and progression of this disease from monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) and smouldering myeloma (SMM) is associated with increasing molecular and chromosomal abnormalities. The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is a post-replicational DNA repair system that maintains genetic stability by repairing mismatched bases and insertion/deletion loops mistakenly incorporated during DNA replication. Deficiencies in proteins pivotal to this pathway result in a higher mutation rate, particularly at regions of microsatellite DNA. We have investigated the proficiency of the MMR pathway in clinical samples and myeloma cell lines. Microsatellite analysis showed instability at one or more of nine loci examined in 15 from 92 patients: 7.7% of MGUS/SMM, 20.7% of MM/plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) and 12.5% of relapsed MM/PCL. An in vitro heteroduplex G/T repair assay found reduced repair in two cell lines, JIM1 and JIM3, and in two of four PCL cases and was associated with aberrant expression of at least one mismatch repair protein. Thus we show that MMR defects are found in plasma cell dyscrasias and the increased frequency during more active stages of the disease suggests a contributory role in disease progression.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Relation between DNA ploidy status and the expression of the DNA-mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 in cytological specimens of melanoma lymph node and liver metastases.

DNA-mismatch repair is essential for preventing genetic instability, and its important protective role has been demonstrated in several tumors. The main aim of this study was to investigate the expression of MLH1 and MSH2 (on the RNA level) in melanoma liver and lymph node metastases, and to define the relation between DNA ploidy status and mismatch repair gene expression. MLH1 was found in 29/33 melanoma lymph node and in 5/17 melanoma liver metastases. MSH2 was present in 26/33 lymph node and 5/17 liver metastases. A comparison of MLH1 and MSH2 positive and negative melanoma metastases showed that there were highly significant differences in the percentages of diploid cells, aneuploid cells between 4c and 8c, octaploid cells, and 5c exceeding rate. This fact confirms the strong relation between the loss of DNA-mismatch repair gene expression and advanced DNA aneuploidy status in melanoma metastases.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Role of DNA mismatch repair in apoptotic responses to therapeutic agents.

Deficiencies in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) have been found in both hereditary cancer (i.e., hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) and sporadic cancers of various tissues. In addition to its primary roles in the correction of DNA replication errors and suppression of recombination, research in the last 10 years has shown that MMR is involved in many other processes, such as interaction with other DNA repair pathways, cell cycle checkpoint regulation, and apoptosis. Indeed, a cell's MMR status can influence its response to a wide variety of chemotherapeutic agents, such as temozolomide (and many other methylating agents), 6-thioguanine, cisplatin, ionizing radiation, etoposide, and 5-fluorouracil. For this reason, identification of a tumor's MMR deficiency (as indicated by the presence of microsatellite instability) is being utilized more and more as a prognostic indicator in the clinic. Here, we describe the basic mechanisms of MMR and apoptosis and investigate the literature examining the influence of MMR status on the apoptotic response following treatment with various therapeutic agents. Furthermore, using isogenic MMR-deficient (HCT116) and MMR-proficient (HCT116 3-6) cells, we demonstrate that there is no enhanced apoptosis in MMR-proficient cells following treatment with 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine. In fact, apoptosis accounts for only a small portion of the induced cell death response.

Alkylating Agents↗

Loss of DNA mismatch repair in acquired resistance to cisplatin.

Selection of cells for resistance to cisplatin, a well-recognized mutagen, could result in mutations in genes involved in DNA mismatch repair and thereby to resistance to DNA-alkylating agents. Parental cells of the human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line 2008 expressed hMLH1 when analyzed with immunoblot. One subline selected for resistance to cisplatin (2008/A) expressed no hMLH1, whereas another (2008/C13*5.25) expressed parental levels. Microsatellite instability was readily demonstrated in 2008/A cells but not in 2008 and in 2008/C13*5.25 cells. In addition, the 2008/A cells were 2-fold resistant to methyl-nitro-nitrosoguanidine and had a 65-fold elevated mutation rate at the HPRT locus as compared to 2008 cells, both of which are consistent with the loss of DNA mismatch repair in these cells. To determine whether the loss of DNA mismatch repair itself contributes to cisplatin resistance, studies were carried out in isogenic pairs of cell lines proficient or defective in this function. HCT116, a human colon cancer cell line deficient in hMLH1 function, was 2-fold resistant to cisplatin when compared to a subline complemented with chromosome 3 and expressing hMLH1. Similarly, the human endometrial cancer cell line HEC59, which expresses no hMSH2, was 2-fold resistant to cisplatin when compared to a subline complemented with chromosome 2 that expresses hMSH2. Therefore, the selection of cells for resistance to cisplatin can result in the loss of DNA mismatch repair, and loss of DNA mismatch repair in turn contributes to resistance to cisplatin.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗